On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:40:46AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> One more thing I noticed while looking at your patch 3/4:
>
> > +static int pcm990_camera_set_bus_param(struct device *dev,
> > + unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + if (gpio_bus_switch <= 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (flags & SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8)
> > + gpio_set_value(NR_BUILTIN_GPIO + 1, 1);
> > + else
> > + gpio_set_value(NR_BUILTIN_GPIO + 1, 0);
>
> Originally the logic here was "only if flags == SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8, switch
> to 8 bits, otherwise do 10 bits. I.e., if flags == SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_8 |
> SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_10, it would still do the default (and wider) 10 bits. Do
> you have any reason to change that logic?
I was not aware that I changed any logic. I thought I would get here
with only one of the SOCAM_DATAWIDTH_* set. Isn't it a bug when we get
here with more than one width flags set?
The mt9v022 driver has this in set_bus_param:
>
> /* Only one width bit may be set */
> if (!is_power_of_2(width_flag))
> return -EINVAL;
>
And I think it makes sense.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
