Aguirre, Sergio wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:mich...@panicking.kicks-ass.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Aguirre, Sergio
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omap34xxcam question?

Aguirre, Sergio wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:mich...@panicking.kicks-ass.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:25 AM
To: Aguirre, Sergio
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omap34xxcam question?

Hi,

Aguirre, Sergio wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:mich...@panicking.kicks-ass.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:01 AM
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Aguirre, Sergio
Subject: omap34xxcam question?

Hi

Is ok that it try only the first format and size? why does it not
continue
and find a matching?
Actually, that was the intention, but I guess it was badly
implemented.
Thanks for the catch, and the contribution!

Regards,
Sergio
@@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ static int try_pix_parm(struct
omap34xxcam_videodev
*vdev,
                        pix_tmp_out = *wanted_pix_out;
                        rval = isp_try_fmt_cap(isp, &pix_tmp_in,
&pix_tmp_out);
                        if (rval)
-                               return rval;
+                               continue;

Is the patch good? or you are going to provide a better fix
Yes. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.

Looks good to me, and I don't have a better fix on top of my head for
the moment...
I'm assuming you tested it in your environment, right?
Ok, my enviroment is not pretty stable but for sure this is required.
There is one problem:

Suppose that the camera support this format:

YUV and RAW10

The video4linux enumeration is done in this order.
We know that if you want to use resizer and previewer we can't use the YUV
(go straight to memory)
but it is selected because is the first. So maybe the best thing is to
find the one that is suggest in the csi
configuration first. Hope that is clear.

Hmm.. I see.

So, if I got you right, you're saying that, there should be priorities for 
sensor baseformats, depending on the preference specified somewhere in the 
boardfile?

Yes, that is the idea. Try to provide a better patch later, I'm working hard on 
the sensor part :)

Michael


Regards,
Sergio
Michael

If yes, then I'll take the patch in my queue for submission to Sakari's
tree.
Thanks for your time.

Regards,
Sergio

Michael

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to