Linux-Misc Digest #498, Volume #18 Thu, 7 Jan 99 00:13:09 EST
Contents:
Slackware + RPM ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: good office package for linux (Hendrik Boom)
Re: Debian seg fault (Hendrik Boom)
Re: Debian seg fault (Geoffrey Kenneth Holden)
Re: [Q] Corel WordPerfect 8.0 ... Any experiences? (Jack Slater)
Linux fails to boot after dual-booting Windows 95;Reinstall LILO and it works
again!? (Eric Hardwick)
Re: ttyS2 -or- cua2....what's the difference??? (Gary Momarison)
DIGI intelligent card problems (Yan Seiner)
Re: Whats the best *offline* usenet reader for Linux? (Ian Tester)
printer, scanner drivers for linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Walnut Creek CDROM using FreeBSD and Apache + SSL ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
FAQ for "X" over LAN from RH 5.2 (Zachary hamm)
Re: Caching nameserver causes delay in sending mail (Vincent Zweije)
Shall I wait for a new release? ("Javier Minero")
Re: Compiling gives header file errors (Stuart R. Fuller)
Single Floppy Linux on HD-less PC ?? (Douglas I-Hsi Chen)
Re: PPP Kernel support ("Javier Minero")
Re: Linux: Fight for survival or on victory march? (Chris Woods)
Re: Can't reboot at root from "xdm" ("Bobby D. Bryant")
release root access (Daniel Suen)
Re: PPP Kernel support (Mike Werner)
Re: [Q] Corel WordPerfect 8.0 ... Any experiences? (Mike Werner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slackware + RPM
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:22:36 -0500
Hello,
I installed rpm on my slackware box via the Slackware + rpm
mini-howto. I am assuming rpm was installed since every time I try to
install a rpm package i get failed dependencies to libs/files that are
already installed. I am pretty sure that there should be a file to tell
rpm where these libs are? /usr/etc/rpm contains some interesting files,
but no lib= entry. Anyone know how to tell rpm that the libs are already
installed?
Thanks,
Navi
------------------------------
From: Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,pl.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: good office package for linux
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 11:23:44 -0500
Michel Catudal wrote:
>
> There is no way in hell that could be downloaded, the line will go
> dead way before it's done. What we need is to be able to get it
> with NcFTP. Anyone who put huge file like that on the web is brain
> dead. Most people are not using a satellite or cable hookup. Most
> of us are stuck with shitty phone lines. At best we could get the
> file at 98%.
>
I started the FTP under Netscape, taking care to write down the entire
URL.
When the line dropped, I restarted it by using ftp (by itself -- no
netscape). After that, every time the lie dropped, I used a reget
instead of a get to resume the download from where it left off.
This worked fine.
------------------------------
From: Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian seg fault
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 11:11:53 -0500
Geoffrey Kenneth Holden wrote:
>
> John Girash ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : : Geoffrey Kenneth Holden writes:
> : :> My friend is running Debian 2.0 on his computer. (So am I, but I haven't
> : :> had any problems) When we try to run Wordperfect 8 or Netscape, we get a
> : :> segmentation fault. Has anybody else had this problem? If so, what is the
> : :> solution?
>
> : another possible problem: insufficient memory. Are you trying to run NS4 or
> : WP8 on an 8MB machine perhaps? Just a guess of course. (I think the vendors
> : recommend 9.5MB and 16MB minimum respectively).
>
> : jg
>
> : --
> : "don't listen when you're told / about the best days in your life : Spirit of
> : a useless old expression, it means / passing time until you die." : the West
> : -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> : -- John Girash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://skyron.harvard.edu/ --
>
> Nope, his machine is a PII with 64MB RAM.
> We decided to try RedHat instead. Netscape and WP work fine now, but X
> is having a hard time with his video card (ATI 3D Rage Pro). We can't get
> better than 640x480 on it. (but we had 1024x768 with Debian)
I have the same problem with the video card. I haven't investigated
yet (no time) but I suspect that the default list of screen modes Redhat
provides for my monitor happens not to match the list of screen modes
for the ATI card.
The solution is probably to add a few entries to these configuration
files.
OS/2 and Windows 95 have no trouble reaching higher resolutions.
Maybe your Debian config files would provide a clue?
>
> --
> Geoff/Upsilon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.xoom.com/DeepThought
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoffrey Kenneth Holden)
Subject: Re: Debian seg fault
Date: 7 Jan 1999 02:57:00 GMT
Hendrik Boom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: > Nope, his machine is a PII with 64MB RAM.
: > We decided to try RedHat instead. Netscape and WP work fine now, but X
: > is having a hard time with his video card (ATI 3D Rage Pro). We can't get
: > better than 640x480 on it. (but we had 1024x768 with Debian)
: I have the same problem with the video card. I haven't investigated
: yet (no time) but I suspect that the default list of screen modes Redhat
: provides for my monitor happens not to match the list of screen modes
: for the ATI card.
: The solution is probably to add a few entries to these configuration
: files.
: OS/2 and Windows 95 have no trouble reaching higher resolutions.
: Maybe your Debian config files would provide a clue?
In hindsight, we should have backed those up, but they are gone forever. Maybe
a newer version would help, we used 5.0 but I can get a 5.2 CD. What did you
use?
--
Geoff/Upsilon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/DeepThought
------------------------------
From: Jack Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Q] Corel WordPerfect 8.0 ... Any experiences?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 21:04:50 -0700
Augusto Cardoso wrote:
> I plan to install WordPerfect 8.0 under SuSE Linux 5.3
> As anyone tried that ? I'm still using LIBC5...
> Any caveats?
> Thanks for the inputs
>
> Augusto
It seems to work fine with libc5. When I got it there were two download
options, one with a single large file, and one broken into 8 segments.
I could not get the 8 segment version to work, but the single, file
worked.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Hardwick)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Linux fails to boot after dual-booting Windows 95;Reinstall LILO and it works
again!?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 01:31:24 GMT
Hi,
Has anybody ever had problems booting Linux after exiting
Windows 95 on a dual boot system using LILO?
I had a perfectly working dual boot system (Debian 2.0 / Win95) a few
days ago but after I installed a US Robotics 56k Plug N Play external
modem under Linux and then Win95 (both without problems) I couldn't
boot Linux off the hard-drive when the last boot-up was to Windows
95...
I don't think LILO is really failing since I get almost all the way
through the boot sequence before the computer simply resets itself
(like someone pushed the Reset switch) at the 'Loading vfat' line and
I am left watching the BIOS bootup screens.
So the order of events is like this:
1. Turn on machine; Get LILO boot: prompt.
2. Choose Windows 95; Win95 boots correctly.
3. Shut down Win95; Reboot machine; Get LILO boot: prompt.
4. Choose Linux; Watch boot messages (gets past HDD detection,
mounting drives, fsck)
5. Machine reboots itself when loadable modules line is displayed
(Loading vfat...), right after vfat item is displayed.
6. Insert Linux bootable floppy made during inital installation.
7. Boot again; No LILO prompt (from hard-drive).
8. Boot correctly all the way.
9. Reinstall LILO; Reboot machine; Get LILO prompt.
10. Choose Linux; Boot correctly all the way.
This is so strange since this system worked perfectly before I
installed the 56k modem, which works great under both OS's! Why would
re-installing LILO fix the Loading vfat module problem? What does a
modem have to do with LILO?
Please give me any advice you can, I am losing my mind...
Thanks in advance,
Eric Hardwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Gary Momarison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ttyS2 -or- cua2....what's the difference???
Date: 06 Jan 1999 08:27:09 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barton) writes:
> I am completely puzzled by this. Can anyone shed some light?
You can find a lot of discussion of this with DejaNews. Probably
the c.o.l.developement.system NG.
I think it had something to do with being able to "lock" the
incomming and outgoing ports separately. Two schemes for this
developed. Probably the two-name way was better in some ways,
but to many people where confused by it, and the battle was
won by the one-name crowd. It mostly affects the programmers.
I wonder if your "problem" would be solved by pointing /dev/modem
to the other port. Some software creates lock files based on
/dev/modem and some on /dev/cua* and if you don't configure things
right, the SW can't figure out what you want.
--
Try Gary's Encyclopedia at http://www.aa.net/~swear/pedia/index.html
------------------------------
From: Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: DIGI intelligent card problems
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 09:57:38 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to install a Digi Acceleport/Xe on a RH 5.1 box.
The software installation goes OK. I can look at /proc/devices and see
the digi stuff. No errors on boot or kernel recompile. The digi
devices (ttyD?, cud?) are created in /dev.
When I do ditty /dev/ttyD0, I get
/dev/ttyD0: No such device
This is an ISA card with some sort of software config for the IRQ and
memory window. I'm guessing that the problem is an IRQ conflict or
memory window conflict. I can't seem to be able to find out that IRQ /
mem window the board is set at, so configuration is trial and error-so
far, mostly on the error side.
Any ideas, HOWTOs, or FAQs on installing this board?
TIA,
Yan
------------------------------
From: Ian Tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: news.software.readers
Subject: Re: Whats the best *offline* usenet reader for Linux?
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 15:15:31 +1100
On 7 Jan 1999, Christopher B. Browne wrote:
> On 6 Jan 1999 15:12:04 GMT, Frank Slootweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
> >Christopher Browne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >[deleted]
> >> What you can "compile in" is the ability for SLRN to read news spools
> >> (in a format remarkably similar to what C-News generates). News readers
> >> have long provided this ability, since long before there was NNTP.
> >>
> >> The main chunk of code associated with this "feature" is a separate
> >> program called "slrnpull," which is essentially a stripped-down
> >> alternative to C-News. It takes a list of newsgroups (along with some
> >> parameter information on how long to keep articles and how many to
> >> read), heads off to an NNTP server, and pulls the articles into that
> >> "C-News-like" spool. And pushes back any followup/reply articles.
> >>
> >> It's pretty fast, and works quite well.
> >
> > Is slrnpull also available for MS-Windows? I know that slrn itself is
> >available for Win32, i.e. 95/98/NT, but what about slrnpull?
>
> Yes.
>
> <http://www.vex.net/~cthuang/slrn/> is an appropriate site to look at
> for it. It works quite acceptably on Win32.
yikes. How well does the FAT filesystem handle the lotsa-little-files
problem so common with news spools? Most modern generic Unix filesystems
don't handle it overly well. FAT32 would greatly reduce the overhead from
slack space. But I understand that FAT was originally written for floppies
in mind and so is really simple but doesn't handle large directories very
well (i.e fast or efficient).
bye
(When I get more disk space, I want to try out the reiserfs. It's
supposed to be very good for lots of little files)
8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \7\ LINUX: because geeks \7\ Ian Tester
http://www.imroy.ddns.org/ \7\ will find a way \7\ *8)#
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: printer, scanner drivers for linux?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 04:04:43 GMT
I'd like to run linux on my home pc, but I haven't been able to find any
information on drivers for my printers (Canon LBP 460 laser printer and HP
LaserJet 1100), and for my Visioneer flatbed scanner. Obviously, I can't
switch to linux unless I can find drivers for these. Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Amit
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: mailing.freebsd.questions,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Walnut Creek CDROM using FreeBSD and Apache + SSL ?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:51:47 GMT
Is Walnut Creek CDROM using FreeBSD and Apache + mod_SSL
for their online order system ?
I know that RedHat Linux comes with an RSA license for SSL module,
but how about FreeBSD ? Where does the RSA license of www-secure.cdrom.com
come from ?
Can anyone in Walnut Creek CDROM help ?
Thank you.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Zachary hamm <zhamm-S*P*A*M*[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FAQ for "X" over LAN from RH 5.2
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 11:53:39 -0500
Reply-To: zhammS*P*A*M*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to use a RedHat 5.2 Linux serve to serve up "X" over the
local LAN here. Clients will be WIN95 running Exceed or similar
Xwindows client.
Is there a decent FAQ or HOWTO that explains this well? The ones with
Redhat don't seem to explain anything except local X setup for the Linux
box itself.
What setup do I need to do on Linux to properly setup for remote X?
Also, what is the setup to do securely via SSH 2.0?
Thanks in advance!
Zack
------------------------------
From: Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Caching nameserver causes delay in sending mail
Date: 6 Jan 1999 23:44:37 +0100
In article <76u1rr$fco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve "Poirot" Snyder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|| When sending mail on my RedHat Linux v5.2 system there is a 40 - 45 second
|| delay before the mail is actually sent. Receiving mail on the same system
|| is all but instantaneous.
|| This is what my /etc/resolv.conf looks like (I added the leading spaces
|| for clarity):
||
|| search corona.snydernet.lan snydernet.lan
|| nameserver 127.0.0.1
|| nameserver 199.3.65.1
|| Note that I'm not running a nameserver, which is why there's no reference
|| to it in /etc/resolv.conf.
Eh? "nameserver 127.0.0.1" looks like a sure reference to me.
|| My name resolution is done soley through the
|| /etc/hosts file. I am running a caching nameserver, caching the data
|| gotten from my ISP while connected.
You mean that /etc/hosts is supposed to contain all information about
snydernet.lan. Unfortunately, sendmail doesn't know this; if /etc/hosts
is lacking something, sendmail will still go to your caching name server
at 127.0.0.1, which forwards the request to your ISP.
|| My new conclusion: the delay in sending mail is due to the attempted
|| lookup of corona.snydernet.lan in the cache. Sure enough, if I shut down
|| named, the delay is gone.
What exactly is being looked up is not clear yet. It might be
corona.snydernet.lan, or something else. See below.
Named doesn't use /etc/hosts.
The domains behind the "search" keyword (corona.snydernet.lan and
snydernet.lan) aren't looked up by themselves.
|| Anyone have any thoughts as to how I can have a caching nameserver *and*
|| no delay in sending mail?
Sendmail uses DNS for several things which you might not expect:
(1) Resolving the local hostname to an address.
(2) Resolving the addresses of all your network interfaces to hostnames.
(3) Canonifying mail domains (the part after @).
For (1) and (2), just make sure that your hostname and your interfaces are
in /etc/hosts where sendmail runs. For (3), set "FEATURE(nocanonify)"
in sendmail.mc if you use it, or disable the address rewrite rules that
use $[ ... $] in sendmail.cf.
Hope this helps. Vincent.
--
Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "If you're flamed in a group you
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/> | don't read, does anybody get burnt?"
[Xhost should be taken out and shot] | -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
------------------------------
From: "Javier Minero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Shall I wait for a new release?
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:07:30 -0600
Hi out there,
I am considering buying a new set of CDs with an updated kernel and
changing my distributuion to Redhat (I currently have a very old Slackware
distribution).
Somewhere I heard that kernel 2.1 will soon be ready for a production
release. Is this true? I don't want to buy a set of CDs and then find out
that I should patch up my kernel in the next week. But neither do I want to
wait another 6 months before I can get my hands on the new release.
Any advise would be welcome. You can post it here or reply to my address
removing the spamthis domain, at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Javier Minero
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Subject: Re: Compiling gives header file errors
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 17:00:02 GMT
Gregor Mosheh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: When I try to build some network-related software (diald and ipfwadm for
: instance) I get errors about header files. These programs compile fine
: on a friend's RedHat 5.0 system, but not on my fresh-out-of-the-box
: RedHat 5.1 system. I tried upgrading glibc*.rpm to 2.0.7-29 and it
: didn't help. Any ideas what could be wrong?
:
Well, this doesn't answer the questions you ask. However, if your goal is to
get ipfwadm and diald, then note that ipfwadm is already on the Redhat 5.1
distribution CD. Just run rpm to install it.
And, diald is available, pre-compiled and ready to go in an .rpm at
contrib.redhat.com, or one of its mirrors.
Stu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas I-Hsi Chen)
Subject: Single Floppy Linux on HD-less PC ??
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 16:52:19 GMT
Hi there,
For you Linux gurus. I'd like to know if there's a tiny distribution of
Linux which can run happily on a floppy disk(s) on a machine without a HD?
I've recently moved all HDs from my old PC to the newer one but still wish
to run Linux and telnet to the newer PC at the old one. I've looked into
several "single floppy Linux" web sites, but found no mention about this
specification. Maybe I didn't look hard enough, but please, if you know
anything, I'd be interested to hear it.
Thank you very much,
Douglas
------------------------------
From: "Javier Minero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Kernel support
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 10:38:50 -0600
Ulf Swedin escribi� en mensaje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>But then when I tried to write # make mrproper, I got something like
>bach command not found
>The same when I tried #make menuconfig.
>
Okay, the most probable thing that is happening is that your path does not
contain the current directory.You have two choices: add the you current
directory to your path issuing a command like PATH=.;$PATH or try to do the
make including the full path, such as /usr/src/linux/make mrproper.
Hope this helps.
>Ulf
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Woods)
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux: Fight for survival or on victory march?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 17:15:02 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, aldev wrote:
>Linux Marketing?? Ofcourse here is the web page for it.
>
>Main site is at -
> http://members.spree.com/technology/aldev/
Wow, there is a LOT of misinformation on that site. I'd be embarrassed to
use that as ammo for the suits. Sounds like it was written by a clueless
suit. No offense, but perhaps you'd be better off doing some research and
validating your claims before you publish and advertise something like that.
-c.
--
/**************************************************************\
* Chris Woods * R&D/Software Development/MIS/Webmaster etc. *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * EVOLV LLC * http://www.evolv.com/ *
* "You can't cross a large chasm in two small jumps." *
\**************************************************************/
------------------------------
From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Can't reboot at root from "xdm"
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 22:43:40 -0600
Jon D. Slater wrote:
> Once I log in as root using an XDM login, I've noticed if I type
> "reboot" or "reboot &" in an xterm my machine does not reboot until I
> press <Alt><Ctrl><F1>, switch to a text based" screen.
>
> Then the machine (running Redhat 5.2) reboots normally.
>
> Why can't I reboot my machine from within an XDM login session?
>
> Or maybe my question sould be "How do I reboot from an xterm run under
> an XDM login?"
>
> Please send suggestions to: JSlater<at>Qualcomm<dot>Com
>
> Thanks in advance!!
The shutdown system doesn't know that you have xdm is running. Disable whatever
you're currently doing to start it, and instead start it by editing
/etc/inittab, changing the line
id:3:initdefault:
to
id:5:initdefault:
This is known as "run level 5", and will automatically start xdm at boot time
under RedHat, and will leave some kind of trail so that the shutdown system
knows that xdm needs to be killed inter alia.
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
------------------------------
From: Daniel Suen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: release root access
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:28:29 +0800
Hi All,
I am using RedHat 4.1. I am fiddling with the .rhosts, hosts.equiv stuff.
So far, I have disabled the tcp wrapper for rshd, rexecd, and rlogind. I
tried adding .rhosts afterwards, and it fails. Then I tried removing all
these .rhosts files and then add the remote hostnames in hosts.equiv, and
it works for ordinary users but not the root. After I read the man page,
it does not help as those daemons don't accept the -h option as those are
old versions. Besides, the man pages do not say that it needs special
options anyways to make the thing work for root. I know that using
"telnet", I can't login root directly. Is there anyway to get these BSD
services to work for root? If you have an idea, let me know through email
to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Thanks!
best,
daniel.
------------------------------
From: Mike Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Kernel support
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 23:24:37 -0500
Ulf Swedin wrote:
> I had to recompile the kernel. So I copied the files
> kernel-source-2.0.36-07.i386.rpm
> kernel-headers-2.0.36-07.i386.rpm
> as well as
> ncurses-devel-4.2-10.i386.rpm and
> ncurses--4.2-10.i386.rpm
> to the /usr/src/linux library.
This might be a stupid question, but did you unpack those rpm's? Gotta
unpack them before you can use them.
> But then when I tried to write # make mrproper, I got something like
> bach command not found
> The same when I tried #make menuconfig.
Were you in the /usr/src/linux directory at the time? If so, is make
and all the other development stuff - like gcc - installed?
--
Mike Werner KA8YSD | "Where do you want to go today?"
ICQ# 12934898 | "As far from Redmond as possible!"
AIM Screen Name Reznaeous |
'91 GS500E |
Morgantown WV |
=====BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK=====
Version: 3.1
GU d-@ s:+ a- C++>$ UL++ P+ L+++ E W++ N++ !o w--- O- !M V-- PS+ PE+
Y+ R+ !tv b+++(++++) DI+ D--- G e*>++ h! r++ y++++
======END GEEK CODE BLOCK======
------------------------------
From: Mike Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Q] Corel WordPerfect 8.0 ... Any experiences?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 23:33:45 -0500
I've got it running under Slackware 3.4 which still uses libc5 as far as
I can tell. Works beautifully. One slight installation caveat is the
file I downloaded was labelled GUILG00.gz when in reality it is a
gzipped tarball. I simply renamed it to guilg00.tar.gz and proceeded as
normal as per the instructions.
--
Mike Werner KA8YSD | "Where do you want to go today?"
ICQ# 12934898 | "As far from Redmond as possible!"
AIM Screen Name Reznaeous |
'91 GS500E |
Morgantown WV |
=====BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK=====
Version: 3.1
GU d-@ s:+ a- C++>$ UL++ P+ L+++ E W++ N++ !o w--- O- !M V-- PS+ PE+
Y+ R+ !tv b+++(++++) DI+ D--- G e*>++ h! r++ y++++
======END GEEK CODE BLOCK======
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
