Linux-Misc Digest #597, Volume #20               Sat, 12 Jun 99 05:13:09 EDT

Contents:
  x11amp rpm question ("William B. Cattell")
  Re: Lilo alternative (Fernando Sanabria)
  Re: zImage and bzImage ( ��)
  New install hangs at boot (Christopher Kyhl)
  Re: time nightmare (Johan Kullstam)
  Re: RedHat 5.2 (How do you upgrade to 6.0 over the internet?) (Kenyon Ralph)
  Re: redhat 6.0 secure ttys (Greg Leblanc)
  Re: login restrictions (nlucent)
  Re: Superblock & inode (Scott Lanning)
  Re: Some USR modems are MS-only, Re: [SURVEY] Who has an internal   modemin his 
linux box ? (Curley)
  Re: GLX accelerated quake with TNT card (Donovan Rebbechi)
  DOSEMU and hidden/system files (Jaime Herazo B.)
  Re: LinuxShopping.com Domain name. (Jim Hill)
  What is the newest version of Apache for RedHat 5.2? (Brad Ball)
  Re: 'ls' command: how to show all files in all directories? (Ekkard Gerlach)
  Re: AIX UNIX (John McKown)
  linux, netscape...and Intellimouse (Daniel)
  Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output... (Owen Cook)
  Re: first/second/third world (Richard Kulisz)
  Free Sex Links  1267 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: (Bryan)
  Re: Sound (Zoran Cutura)
  Re: ipchains and MS Netmeeting (Bryan)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "William B. Cattell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: x11amp rpm question
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 05:39:07 GMT

I'm trying to install x11amp 0.9 on my Red Hat 5.2 / kernel 2.2.6
system.  When I go into package manager and try to install it I
get a box saying that it has failed dependencies and needs
libaudiofile.so.0 and libesd.so.0

I've downloaded a couple packages that the authors say are (gtk &
glib 1.2.1) needed but trying to install them fails with messages
that several programs need code that the new packages are trying
to replace.

The question - How do I upgrade a RedHat package without
uninstalling and reinstalling all the packages that depend on it? 

TIA,

Bill 
-- 
==============================================================
http://members.home.com/wcattell
==============================================================
Park not thy Harley in the darkness of thine garage, that it 
may collect dust for want of being oft ridden. Ride thy Harley 
with thy brethren, and rejoice in the spirit of the road.
==============================================================

------------------------------

From: Fernando Sanabria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lilo alternative
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:41:30 -0500

Does GRUB load UnixWare ?

Matthias Meixner wrote:

> johan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > About 2 years ago I downloaded a multi-boot utility that was quite
> > neat.  Now I've multi-patitioned my machine again, and I was searching
> > for the same one, but can't find it anywhere.  I cannot remember the
> > name, or where I downloaded it from.  (I just know it was the author's
> > home page, not a commercial site.)  I hope someone recognises it, and
> > can tell me where I can find it.
>
> Was it GRUB (Grand Unified Bootloader)?
>
> - Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Meixner                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
========================================
This are my personal opinions
Real e-mail sanabriaf at yahoo dot com



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( ��)
Subject: Re: zImage and bzImage
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:17:34 GMT

On 9 Jun 1999 14:53:42 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
wrote:

>From /usr/src/linux/Documentation/kbuild/commands.txt:
>
>  Note: the difference between 'zImage' files and 'bzImage' files is that
>  'bzImage' uses a different layout and a different loading algorithm,
>  and thus has a larger capacity.  Both files use gzip compression.
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  The 'bz' in 'bzImage' stands for 'big zImage', not for 'bzip'!
>
sorry.8-(
becaurse when my kernel go too big ,then i use bzImage will be ok. 
so i think so....8-(


------------------------------

From: Christopher Kyhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New install hangs at boot
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 00:49:24 -0500


Please help point me in the right direction on this issue during the
installation of Red Hat v5.2...

After apparently flawless install...reboot computer and hit <enter> at
"LILO boot:" and get the "Loading linux........" and then the system
hangs.  I tried to install several times both with and without a boot
floppy (and both with and without updating the master boot record).  I
tried both with and without "Use Linear Mode" option (my drive is
operating in LBA mode so according to the manual this should be
selected).  I am suspicious of the MBR/boot partition since I did an
"fdisk /MBR" in DOS a few days ago.  The first partition is marked as
"bootable/active" in fdisk under LINUX during the install (I used Disk
Druid numerous times, but didn't see how a partition could be marked
active so I tried using fdisk during the install which allowed me to
mark the root "/" partition as active).  I can run the installation
program from Red Hat CD, BUT IT WILL NOT RUN WHEN I TRY TO USE THE RED
HAT FLOPPY (receive "boot failed" message while "Loading initrd.img").

System:  AMD K6-2/300, FIC PT-2011 board, 64MB EDO, Matrox Mystique w/
4MB, 4.3 GB Quantum Fireball Ultra/DMA, AMIBIOS

Thanks in advance,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Subject: Re: time nightmare
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Jun 1999 17:55:32 -0400

"TwoSheds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Now I'm confused - I can't find my original posting and I can't find the
> original posting of the helpful fella who'd had the same problem. Anyway:
> 
> > I would check your RTC battery. Maybe its out of power? But, it wouldn't
> > surprise me, that Windows has one more bug, YAWB!  (= Yet Another Windows
> > Bug).
> 
> Well, I've never had a problem with the clock before. I won't consider this
> option just yet. I'm not even sure it's a Windows bug, either, but that
> wouldn't surprise me.
> 
> > >my tips for a modicum of time sanity on a dual boot system:
> > >* set cmos time to gmt.
> > >* configure linux use gmt and display time offsets.
> > >* let nt think it's gmt.  microsoft is such a lose.  you can't fix it
> > >  so just accept it and let it lose.
> > >
> > >it isn't perfect but at least time doesn't jump around all over the
> > >place.
> > >
> 
> What do you mean by "let NT think it's GMT". I *want* NT, as well as Linux,
> to both think it's GMT, cos it is where I am.

i'm sorry.  i meant UTC.  UTC is GMT without any daylight savings
shenanigans.  when you use local time with daylight savings in the
hardware clock, the operating system tries to adjust the hardware
clock to spring forward and fall back.  you can see that dual booting
between multiple operating systems can easily result in double
adjustment.

the solution is to set the hardware clock to UTC and tell the
operating system your timezone so that it can figure out your local
time.  linux can do this.  windows, including NT, is incapable of
that.  sorry.

> Someone mentioned Network Time Servers - could this be the
> solution. 

yes, this may work.  i am not sure how to set this up.  it would
require connexion to the internet.  you could fire off an rdate in a
boot script to set the clocks.  there is also some kind of time daemon
to keep a system synch'd.  i am not sure about equivalent solutions
for microsoft's operating system.

> How do
> I tell if this is configured in NT or Linux, and if not, how do I configure
> it.
> I need to be reasonably accurate with time cos I'll be running a web server.
> 
> -kev

-- 
J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenyon Ralph)
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2 (How do you upgrade to 6.0 over the internet?)
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 05:19:03 GMT

On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 05:01:12 GMT, Brad Ball wrote:
> I cannot find the instructions on www.redhat.com Anyone know how to do
> this?

You just start an install (ftp, http, nfs, whatever) like normal, and choose
the upgrade option when prompted.  The option prompt is one of the first
(maybe it is the first?) of the install procedure after you boot from the
boot floppy.

-- 
Kenyon Ralph | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://home.san.rr.com/ralphs

------------------------------

From: Greg Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: ahn.tech.linux,alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: redhat 6.0 secure ttys
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 05:13:57 GMT

In article <7jlpa1$j26$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Ryan Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been suffering the same frustration and just got off the
telephone
> with redhat support.  According to the engineer that I spoke with,
root
> telnet access has been removed completely from redhat 6.0.  No
> workarounds whatsoever.

That's a crock, because there most certainly is.  You can remove/disable
the /etc/securetty file.  This will make root logins work from ANY
telnet session, so use with caution.  However, what is wrong with
telneting(sshing?) as your normal user and SUing to root?
   Greg
[SNIP]

--
It's pronounced "sexy" not "scuzzy"!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: nlucent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: login restrictions
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 05:08:27 GMT

In article <7jro3e$nru$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I restrict a person from logging in as root?
>
> Daryl Rose
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>

The easy answer would be to not give them the password, but Im betting
thats not what your looking for. Could you be more specific with your
question?

Nick
--
The opinions expressed are my own, and are not
endorsed or shared by my employer.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Lanning)
Subject: Re: Superblock & inode
Date: 11 Jun 1999 06:25:10 GMT

Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Where can I get the format about superblock and inode?

The words "format about" are somewhat confusing; maybe
you mean "information about" or "format of".

For structs and brief description
http://step.polymtl.ca/~ldd/ext2fs/ext2fs_toc.html

For good overview and surprisingly good all-around details
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/LDP/tlk/tlk.html
in particular, "The File System" and "Linux Data Structures".

I have a book, "Linux Kernel Internals" by Beck, et al, which
covers kernel 2.0, and has very very good detail, particularly
sections 6.2 and 6.4 cover what I presume you are looking for,
with regard to ext2fs.

--
Scott Lanning: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://physics.bu.edu/~slanning
"Windows was designed to keep the idiots away from Unix so we could
hack in peace. Let's not break that." --Tom Christiansen

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Curley)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Some USR modems are MS-only, Re: [SURVEY] Who has an internal   modemin 
his linux box ?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 06:22:09 GMT

On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 20:28:17 -0500, 9wands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
scribbled:

>Andrew Comech wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, 11 May 1999 09:28:17 -0700, Charles Morley wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >Jan Johansson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >It would be good if 3Com would label its retail packaging clearly,
>> >> >so we could know at point-of-sale which modems in its product line are
>> >> >Microsoft-only.


Well, actually they do.  Look at the box, and look for "System
Requirements".   Winmodems only say Windows 9* as a requirement, while
non-winmodems also run under dos, etc...


============================================
Microsoft Zone ZSTAR  (*schrumby)
AntiSpam Email:  schrumby at hotmail dot com
Visit my homepage at http://surf.to/joes        
============================================

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: GLX accelerated quake with TNT card
Date: 12 Jun 1999 06:06:23 GMT

On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:21:27 -0400, Jim Zubb wrote:
>Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>> 

Cool, It works now. One problem I still seem to be having: when I run in softx,
the mouse behaves fine, but when I run in GL/X , I get a big fat mouse
cursor in the middle of my game. Ughh. Any pointers^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htips ?

-- 
Donovan

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaime Herazo B.)
Subject: DOSEMU and hidden/system files
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:05:08 GMT

Hi.

Have you tried to make a file hidden using dosemu, when it�s on a ext2
partition? it won�t let you. We have an old DOS accounting program we
are using, and i want to transfer it to a linux box. But the program
requires that one of its files in its root dir must be
readonly-hidden-system, or else it puts out an "illegal" error (think
about this heavy copy protection, ha!). I don�t want to put it in a
separated fat partition or a dosemu hdimage, because it grows with
use. Any suggestions to make the file appear as RHS to dosemu while
being in an ext2 partition?






------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hill)
Subject: Re: LinuxShopping.com Domain name.
Date: 12 Jun 1999 06:44:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sangcheol Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there anyone who want to get LinuxShopping.com Domain name ?

>I have regiesterd the domain and want to transfer it .

Transfer it, or get a usurious profit for possession of something that
cost you less than $100US and ten minutes of pointing and clicking?

>Minimun price for it is only $5000.

Ah.  Usurious profit.  Go rot, assbag.


Jim
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                      http://www.swcp.com/~jimhill/

   "People have grown used to thinking of computers as unreliable, 
       and it doesn't have to be that way."  --  Linus Torvalds

------------------------------

From: Brad Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What is the newest version of Apache for RedHat 5.2?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 05:50:40 GMT

... and where can I download it. In RPM format.

Brad.


------------------------------

From: Ekkard Gerlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 'ls' command: how to show all files in all directories?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:12:51 +0200

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Greetings,
>

Cheers,

> ls * > allfiles1.txt
> ls */* > allfiles2.txt
> ls */*/* > allfiles3.txt

all files in ONE file:  (choose the right komma!!)
ls `find`  > allfiles.txt
ls -l `find` > allfiles.txt
ls -l `find /home/miller` > allfiles.txt                      with
absolute path
ls -l `find /home/miller -type f`  > allfiles.txt                    only
regular files (textfiles)
ls -l `find /home/miller -maxdepth  3` > allfiles.txt         don�t
recurse greater than 3
....


Ekkard




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKown)
Subject: Re: AIX UNIX
Date: 11 Jun 1999 07:31:15 GMT

On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:57:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyone have any info on AIZ UNIX and what it comes with. I am takeing
>on a job that has an IBM RS6000 with AIX UNIX on it. I am new to this

Try asking on comp.unix.aix. Also, IBM has a web site
http://www.rs6000.ibm.com
Which has a LOT of information on the RS/6000 and AIX. Most of the manuals
are available for reading via this web site. 

Vague ramblings follow so that Prodigy's news server doesn't reject my post.
My company runs 14 RS/6000 boxes. But I don't work on them. I'm in tech
support for the OS/390 (S/390 mainframe) system. I also run Linux at home.

Good luck with your new position,
John

------------------------------

From: Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux, netscape...and Intellimouse
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:10:12 -0700


            alt.os.linux




    For the life of me I can't find this wonderful page that has 'Cook"
book instructions for using the MS intellimouse in SEVERAL apps...

Including netscape...


I finally did get the Wacom pen to work...but damed if it's so late I
can't hack it
tonight....

It was someone's name like "nickolos...Coladoes...or somehting...

If anyooone has gotten the scroll to work in Netscape...PLEASE let me
knnnnow

where i got this stuff before....I't just needs to be appended to the
Xdefaults...


and some changed mad to the x and y mappying....


Thanks ahead of time...

Danie In Oregon







------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Owen Cook)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output...
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:51:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:58:36 -0400, DonJr <donjr@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:

>The easiest way I've found to setup pppd under RH 5.2 or RH 6.0 is:
>  # linuxconf   { either under X or text mode take you pick}
>     - Networking
>       - Client tasks

><good stuff snipped>
>
>Now at the command prompt
>  $ /sbin/ifup ppp0        will bring up the connection
>  $ /sbin/ifdown ppp0      will bring down the connection

After trying, and failing a hundred times to use ppp-on etc, I tried
linuxconf as suggested in this post.  It worked first time, and
continues to work.

However  the /sbin/ifdown ppp0 doesn't work and would appreciate any
suggestion as where I should be looking to fix this problem.


Owen


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kulisz)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: first/second/third world
Date: 12 Jun 1999 08:28:52 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gus  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>South Africa is considered to be a Developing Country which is
>predominantly thrid-world, but a substantial proportion of the
>population live a First World lifestyle, with first world
>infrastructure.

Mexico has one of the world's largest populations of billionaires,
and /they/ surely can afford a first-world lifestyle. As a famous
aphorism goes, to get the measure of a society you must look at how
it treats its poorest and most vulnerable members.

First World largely refers to Exploiter nations (eg, USA) and Third
World to their colonies (eg, Mexico, Brazil, Columbia, Saudi Arabia).
Nations like France and Germany also exploit their colonies but no
nation (not even Britain) has ever been as ruthless and callous as
the USA has shown itself to be; the USA achieves in decades the levels
of misery Britain could only impose on India in centuries (now there's
something to be proud of!) Second World refers to nations that are
both exploiter and exploited or neither.

Naturally, when you categorize "objectively" you must put everything
in terms of average incomes or some other convenient conjured up tripe.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free Sex Links  1267
Date: 12 Jun 1999 06:52:15 GMT

For the nastiest sex pictures visit:

http://freespace.virgin.net/efrwer.werewrd/


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 04:16:21 +0000
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:

Clifford Smith wrote:
> 
> In comp.os.linux.security David Renton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Hello,
> 
> : How about encrypting the file system?  Linux Journal had an article on this
> : in July 1998 which used the DES/IDEA kernel patches to allow encrypting a
> : file system.  Hence the only way to mount the file system would be with a
> : password.
> 
> yes, that would work but it's not what he needs......
> 
> :> I know that booting from floppy as single user and mounting the root
> :> disk can be used to rescue a system with a forgotten root password. I'm
> :> also aware that this is a part of any unix system.
> <snip>
> 
> :> Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
> :> up? what other work arounds can you suggest? Since these are PCs and
> :> have reset buttons, power cords any user can reboot the machine.
> 
> man lilo.conf explains how to password protect the Linux single option.
> Also, most modern day BIOS's offer the ability to prevent booting from a
> floppy.  I'm assuming, of course, that this is in a lab where a student
> won't be able to take the case off and kill the BIOS without being noticed
> or recorded on film :)
> 
> --Clifford Smith

Another way would be to tell LILO not to even wait at a prompt but to go
right into the boot sequence.  This would prevent, of course, *anyone*
from even going into single user mode, but would provide the *most*
security.  With a password protected BIOS that ignores the floppy and
CDROM drive on boot, you'd be good to go.

To get in, one would have to 1) know the BIOS password to change the
BIOS settings, 2) have a special boot floppy with a copy of the kernel
and/or loadlin or something to boot in for system changes.  In a school,
this shouldn't be a problem.

-- Bryan Scott
-- CTR Online Systems Administration

------------------------------

From: Zoran Cutura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sound
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:42:01 +0000

Dennis Barbier wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Was wondering if anyone could point me in the proper direction. I just
> installed RH6.0 and am looking to ditch Windows completely.
> 
> I need sound support. I've got onboard sound on this computer
> I cant really give you details on the hardware. Win95 Device manager
> lists my sound chipset as a Crystal Audio PNP.
> 
> Its on a NEC Powermate 8100. Could anyone point me in the direction of a
> driver and perhaps a HOWTO?
> 
> Any help *greatly* appreciated.
> 
> Please reply via email.
> Thanks!@!

Hi Dennis,

I don't know the exact drivers and settings for you specific card, 
but sound is globaly setup by compiling it in the kernel. Crystal 
Sound is supported for cards that are based on the CS4232 (check 
back at the manufacturers homepage) You should compile it into the
kernel recall the settings for configuring PnP with the isapnp
tools. man pnpdump and man isapnp will help a lot.

Bye
        Zoran

-- 
LISP is worth learning for the profound enlightenment experience you 
will have when you finally get it; that experience will make you a 
better programmer for the rest of your days.         Eric S. Raymond 
========================================================================
   _/_/_/_/_/    _/_/_/_/ from:  Zoran Cutura, 
          _/   _/      _/     IMH-Innovative Motorentechnik Prof. Huber,
        _/    _/          post:  DaimlerChrysler AG, EP/VRS, X910, 
      _/     _/                  71059 Sindelfingen, Germany,
    _/      _/            phone: +497031 90-77855
  _/       _/       _/    mobil: +49171 4488407
_/_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/      email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
       PGP fingerprint: F0 C3 30 F4 B3 7E 22 36  1C 51 B7 60 A9 BB 23 BE

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 04:23:06 +0000
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: ipchains and MS Netmeeting

Robert Cicconetti wrote:
> 
> The only way I have been able to find is using an application called
> "PhonePatch" from www.equival.com.  30 day trial available.  I never
> finished configuring, as the person I'm setting up the firewall for decided
> Netmeeting wasn't worth $50 (cost of PhonePatch).
> 
> --
> Robert Cicconetti
> Chris Petzny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7jo7v5$7tv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> >
> >     for a while now we have been running IP masquerading on our Linux box
> to
> > get the office access to the internet. All controlled through ipchains.
> We'd
> > like to communicate with MS Netmeeting, however, although others can see
> our
> > video and audio, we can't receive theirs. I was wondering if there is a
> > certain port I need to free up, or if there's a kernel module that needs
> to
> > be loaded ( a la CUSeeMe).
> >
> > Current kernel: 2.2.0 running on RedHat 5.0 I can send the ipchains -L
> > output if anybody needs it...
> >
> > Hope you can help,
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> >

Somebody asked and someone else answered this one already.  

You're stuck with Netmeeting and some of these because they *initiate*
connections to the receiver's IP address.  IP chains work because the
sender is behind the firewall.  The routing mechanism remembers the
outgoing connection and expects a *response* on the same port or set of
ports for the same protocol.  In the case of Netmeeting and FTP and the
like, there isn't anything to tell the firewall that incoming requests
are meant for the specific machine; it thinks they're going to itself. 
(Excepting ftp--I do remember seeing firewall modules for it...) 

I believe the answer for now is: No go.  ...Unless someone else has
written some new stuff.  I've tried NetMeeting and VIRC's video chat
stuff too.  Can't get anywhere yet.

-- Bryan Scott
-- CTR Online Systems Administration

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to