Linux-Misc Digest #769, Volume #23                Mon, 6 Mar 00 19:13:05 EST

Contents:
  New to Linux (Abid Khan)
  Re: home network - also using dial-up service (Dan de Haan)
  Setting up pine for a stand alone machine (Ramin Sina)
  Re: compiling mod_perl with apache RH 6.1 (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: big files (Paul Kimoto)
  ftp script (Martin Willingham)
  Re: multiple users using X on same computer at same time? (Rick)
  Re: multiple users using X on same computer at same time? (Rick)
  Re: viewer for postscript files (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: Newbie admin question (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: Setting up pine for a stand alone machine (H.Bruijn)
  Re: ftp script (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Re: Tar useless for backups? (Robert Heller)
  Re: crazy fdisk output (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Re: section "screen", subsection "display" (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Re: What's the linux equivalent of Outlook Express and Pegasus Mail? (Sam E. 
Trenholme)
  Kernel Compiling-modules (Wayne Sweet)
  Error message from remadmin : (WEBER GRANDISH)
  Re: Mozilla anyone? (Martin Brown)
  Re: How to add new hardware in Linux? (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Re: Red Hat Installation: How to get past the "Which driver" screen when you have 
PCMCIA ethernet (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Screen resolutions ("RCS")
  Re: An optical allusion that will astound you, works on all spec pc's:)   ("K.A. 
Steensma")
  Re: ftp script (Grant Edwards)
  Re: links
  Re: Best 'Free' Backup Solution??? ("Michael Faurot")
  printing doesn't work, but it does using Samba (Bob Koss)
  Re: List of companies using Linux? (Hal Burgiss)
  Clock drift problem (Geoff McCaughan)
  Re: crazy fdisk output (Nico Beuermann)
  Re: What's the linux equivalent of Outlook Express and Pegasus Mail? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Error message from remadmin : (Frederic L. W. Meunier)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Abid Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New to Linux
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 21:56:17 GMT

Hello everyone,
I am new to Linux but have 10 yeras of SCO and AIX experience, I was
able to install Red Hat version 6 on 1 P11, 266 machine, now I need to
know how to add user(s) and a SCSI tape drive (Adaptec cont and DAT
drive), later I want to install a DigiBoard, one more thing how come I
can't login as a root from a Windows machine using Telnet session, it's
keep saying wrong password, I can login on the console using root with
same password, do you have to have a different user added in order to
login from network device. I will appreciate all the help, And I know I
am going to have more question so sorry in advance.

Thank you very much...


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Dan de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: home network - also using dial-up service
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 14:19:56 -0800

Yes, That will work.  It is very easy to do.  Just setup you dial-up
networking an normal, and in the connections tab under internet otions
in the control panel, select dial when netwrok connection doesn't exist.

setup your ethernet cards (connect with a crossover cable) and assing a
unique IP address to each of them (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 for
example)

Bonn wrote:
> 
> I am a MS windows user, and I just bought another computer.
> As I want to know more about linux and network, I install Redhat 6.0 to
> my old computer.
> Installing linux is very easy, but connecting the two computers is a big
> problem for me.
> 
> I have bought 2 network cards, but I don't know how to setup the two
> computers.  I don't know what has to be config.
> My question is: Can I use my window computer to use dial-up service to
> surf the internet, just like how I used to do, and access the linux
> server through local network?
> 
> please also mail to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> regards
> Bonn

------------------------------

From: Ramin Sina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Setting up pine for a stand alone machine
Date: 06 Mar 2000 17:31:21 EST

I use dialup to connect with my ISP  (i.e. don't have a static dimain
name) and have the following problem with pine in Red hat 6.1 (pine
4.10):

a) If I don't specify a domain name pine won't work.
b)If I give my ISP's domain name, then it uses my userid at _Local
Machine_ (which is different from my userid at my ISP)+ the domain name
of _ISP_ , and so when the recepient replies, the mail goes to a wrong
person. Either I'm doing something terribly wrong here or there is a
serious security bug with it (I suspect the former). I've played with
the config files to change the "from" header with no success.

Any hints on how I can fix this?
Thanks,
Ramin Sina
-


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: compiling mod_perl with apache RH 6.1
Date: 6 Mar 2000 17:43:17 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Niklas wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open crt1.o: No such file or directory

I believe that this file should be found in the libc development package.

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: big files
Date: 6 Mar 2000 17:46:02 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <89itp7$bl0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jaime L�pez wrote:
> Anybody knows how to write more than 2.1GB in ONE file in ext2fs ?
> Is this a physical or logical limitation?

Currently Linux on 32-bit platforms can't do this.

> If so, is there any filesystem capable of doing so?

You can run Linux on a 64-bit platform, or use something like FreeBSD.

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: Martin Willingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp script
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 22:30:14 GMT

Does anyone know a way to ftp a list of files?

I wrote a script that uses awk to determine a list of files. Now I want 
the script to automatically ftp them to a different server. 

For example, I use awk to determine which files have zero bytes. Then I 
want to get the files of the same name from a different server.

Thanks.
Martin Willingham


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.powerpc,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: multiple users using X on same computer at same time?
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:33:16 -0500



I R A Darth Aggie wrote:

> On Sun, 05 Mar 2000 20:51:44 -0500,
> Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
> + >
> + > On Sun, 05 Mar 2000 17:51:30 GMT,
> + > Rod Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, in
> + > <C8xw4.3041$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + >
> + > + > I would like to have 2-3 accounts active on the same computer, running X
> + > + > at the same time. I tried cntrl-alr-f2, but when I log in and start X, I
> + > + > get an error saying display 0 is using X. I tried startx --:1, and xinit
> + > + > --:1, but get the same error. Is it possble to do this.
> + >
> + > + It's not clear exactly what you hope to accomplish.
> + >
> + > Probably just chew up more memory and CPU cycles...
>
> + Well, they are my cycles to waste, arent they?
>
> Why certainly. But there may be a better method for doing what you
> want, but you didn't mention that...
>

... and you didnt suggest a way to do it either... someone else has.



------------------------------

From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.powerpc,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: multiple users using X on same computer at same time?
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:34:43 -0500

... but I cant start X using your method. I have since been told that vt8
must be added to the line... I tried that and it worked.

"Donald R. Weimann" wrote:

> Rick,
>
> The easiest way to do what you want is:
> cntrl-alt f1
> login
> startx -- :1
> This will give you your 2nd account (the first is :0)
>
> cntrl-alt f2
> login
> startx -- :2
> This will give you your 3rd account etc.
>
> You can do this up to f6 for a total of 7 xwindows.
>
> cntrl-alt f7 will switch you into your 1st xwindow and cntrl-alt f8-f12
> will switch you into your other xwindows.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> # Don
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to have 2-3 accounts active on the same computer, running
> X
> > at the same time. I tried cntrl-alr-f2, but when I log in and start X,
> I
> > get an error saying display 0 is using X. I tried startx --:1, and
> xinit
> > --:1, but get the same error. Is it possble to do this.
> >
> > any and all help appreciated.
> > --
> >
> > Rick
> > To reply by email remove NOSPAM from my address.
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: viewer for postscript files
Date: 6 Mar 2000 17:49:54 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Krause wrote:
> I use the latest version of gv as viewer for postscript files. When I
> want to jump to a special page I always walk thru the whole document
> side by side (Page ==> Next). So my question is if there exists
> something like "go five pages forward" in gv

According to the man page, you can skip 5 pages by hitting the ">>" button
with the middle mouse button ("button 2"); or 10 pages, with the right
mouse button ("button 3").

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: Newbie admin question
Date: 6 Mar 2000 17:52:30 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert Hutton wrote:
> The problem is that it takes 3 to 4 minutes after telnetting
> to the Linux box (from any machine on the network) before
> a login prompt appears.  I also note that when running the "who"
> command, it takes a really long time to resolve. Running
> the "users" command is not slow.

Perhaps the Linux box is trying to perform a DNS lookup on the
remote hosts.

> There is no  /etc/wtmp or /etc/utmp files which (I think)
> who looks for. The file does exist in /var/run

This is correct for Linux.  See the who(1) man page.

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H.Bruijn)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Setting up pine for a stand alone machine
Date: 6 Mar 2000 22:56:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 06 Mar 2000 17:31:21 EST, Ramin Sina allegedly wrote:
>I use dialup to connect with my ISP  (i.e. don't have a static dimain
>name) and have the following problem with pine in Red hat 6.1 (pine
>4.10):
>
>a) If I don't specify a domain name pine won't work.
>b)If I give my ISP's domain name, then it uses my userid at _Local
>Machine_ (which is different from my userid at my ISP)+ the domain name
>of _ISP_ , and so when the recepient replies, the mail goes to a wrong
>person. Either I'm doing something terribly wrong here or there is a
>serious security bug with it (I suspect the former). I've played with
>the config files to change the "from" header with no success.
>
>Any hints on how I can fix this?

Set a "Reply-To;" header
pico ~/.pinerc 

# Add these customized headers (and possible default values) when
# composing
customized-hdrs=Reply-To: email_address@isp

-- 
      Herman
========================================================================
If a trainstation is the place where trains stop, what is a workstation?
========================================================================
Herman Bruijn                   mail:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands                 GnuPG key:   http://www.bruyn.org/gpgkey

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Subject: Re: ftp script
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:11:05 -0800

>I wrote a script that uses awk to determine a list of files. Now I want 
>the script to automatically ftp them to a different server. 

Have the script write a .netrc file.  "Man ftp" tells you the format of
the .netrc file.

- Sam

-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tar useless for backups?
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:03:41 GMT

  MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  In a message on Mon, 06 Mar 2000 01:13:36 +0000, wrote :

M> Leonard Evens wrote:
M> > 
M> > 
M> > We've been using tar for years, and I've been able to restore
M> > whole file systems on several occasions.  I've also recovered
M> > individual files.  Either you are doing something wrong or
M> > there is something seriously wrong with your system.  You should
M> > give us details including what OS and release you are using,
M> > which version of tar, what you are using for a backup device,
M> > and what command you were using.
M> > 
M> 
M> RH 6.0
M> tar 1.12
M> HDD
M> tar -cf /drive2/whatever.tar /whatever/whatever/
M>                                                                                     
           

OK, next question: what user are you running tar as (normal user /
root) and who owns the files in '/whatever/whatever/' and what sort of
protection are these file set to.  Tar can't backup files it can't read.




                         
-- 
                                     \/
Robert Heller                        ||InterNet:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller  ||            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deepsoft.com              /\FidoNet:    1:321/153

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Subject: Re: crazy fdisk output
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:15:20 -0800

>although my system�s running on /dev/hda:
>( rdev: /dev/hda1 / ) "fdisk -l" shows a horrible partition table. I think
>that comes from the wrong geometry data. My HD has 15 heads, 63 sectors with
>a size of 6.1Megs or so.
>
>Is there anybody who can explain how to fix this problem without loosing any
>data?

If Linux is able to see the partition just fine (as evidenced by the fact
that Linux boots up and works on your system), then I would not worry
about it. 

Fdisk is an old application, and can not handle partition tables generated
by the fdisks that other OSes use all the time.

- Sam
-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Subject: Re: section "screen", subsection "display"
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:19:39 -0800

>How do I get to see the XF86 file? What do I have to type on the console 
>without having installed Linux yet, but on the XF86Config display 
>workaround?

Hmmm, I am not sure exactly what you are asking here (no puedo hablar
espanol tompoco, so I undertand this may be a language barrier), but if I
understand you correctly:

The XF86Config file is located (on RedHat-type system) in /etc/X11.  You
probably don't want to edit this file by hand--jusr run Xconfigurator to
set up X for your display.

X also comes with a script (that is more clunky to use than Xconfigurator)
call xf86config that may work if Xconfigurator fails.

- Sam

-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Subject: Re: What's the linux equivalent of Outlook Express and Pegasus Mail?
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:22:59 -0800

Pine, XFmail, and (IIRC) the mailer that comes with the K Desktop
environment all have this capability.

Go to http://www.freshmeat.net to look for Linux applications.

>I would like to install a simple e-mail client that allows me to
>download and send e-mail messages utilizing external pop3/smtp servers.

Keep in mind that you have to choose the SMTP server you use wisely, since
you can no longer just use any SMTP server on the net to send mail to any
other SMTP server on the net (spammers, ugh)

- Sam

-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: Wayne Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel Compiling-modules
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:22:59 -0800

The kernel is compiled and it boots OK. The problem is not all the
modules are built. For example the pcmcia module is not built, even
though it is in the original installation.
This is on a Dell Inspiron 7500, with SuSE 6.3 installed. Since the
pcmcia module is not built, I can not use the Gold Modem card in that
slot.
I have been through kernel building 20 times and have never gotten the
modules to completely build. The process I am using is 
in /usr/src, expand the kernel tarball
make mrproper
make xconfig 
make dep
make clean
make zImage
make modules
make modules_install

I have seen one reference (forgot where) that the make modules and make
module_install should be before make zImage. Tried that... no luck.
I have tried using the existing pcmcia *.o files, but on boot it
complains that these were compiled with an older kernel (2.2.13 vice the
new 2.2.14).
I'm stumped.
Wayne

------------------------------

From: WEBER GRANDISH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Error message from remadmin :
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:22:33 -0500

does anybody know what this means?

# linuxconf
Error message from remadmin :
Error message from remadmin :Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C
library




------------------------------

Subject: Re: Mozilla anyone?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Brown)
Date: 06 Mar 2000 23:18:13 GMT

In article <8a0cal$mtt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aulne  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>  I got the latest release of Mozilla as part of a CD-ROM software kit.  Is
>it worth of installing?
>
>Alain

Welllll, it's nothing to write home about.  I've been messing with it
since about M11, and now have the latest, M14.  If it goes more than about
6 web pages without crashing it's an achievement.  Of course, it's still
alpha, I believe.


--

                           - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -

                             - BEAUDESIGN.COM -

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Subject: Re: How to add new hardware in Linux?
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:26:18 -0800

>However, there the problem arises: In the absence of a Windows-style
>driver model, how is support for new hardware in Linux added? 

It is added to the kernel proper with what is known as a kernel module.

>Then the question arises: How do we a) find and b) install the necessary
>additions that will allow the use of new hardware?

They usually come with a new kernel, so http://www.kernel.org is probably
the best place to look for new device drivers.

Drivers that are not part of the kernel proper can usually be found with a
web serch engine, such as the one at http://www.google.com

- Sam

-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam E. Trenholme)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Red Hat Installation: How to get past the "Which driver" screen when you 
have PCMCIA ethernet
Date: 6 Mar 2000 15:31:32 -0800

>Is there any way to do this?  If not, what is the workaround?  How to setup
>the networking later on, after the install?

Hmmm, I thought one of the first things the RedHat install program asked
for was if you had any PCMCIA cards.

My solution is a little involved.

1. Get the cardmgr RPM package, which should be on the RedHat cd, install
   it with:

        rpm -i cardmgr-whatever-version.i386.rpm

(in the directory containing RPMS, usually /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS)

2. Insert the PCMCIA card, making sure you see something on the screen
   like "adding device eth0"

3. In an office with DHCP enabled, running "dhcpcd" and waiting two
   minutes.

4. On a home LAN, using the 'ifconfig' and 'route' commands to set up
   an IP for your system.  I have some scripts on my laptop (at home)
   for doing this.

- Sam

-- 
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my 
 heart must come out; that is the reason why I compose"-Ludwig Van Beethoven
Go to http://samiam.org/cgi-bin/mailme to get my email address

------------------------------

From: "RCS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Screen resolutions
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 00:32:55 +0100

Hello,
I'm fairly new to Linux ( have installed it a couple of times on a couple of
machines)  and I keep having the same problem with the screen resolution -
the installed system doesn't accept resolutions higher than 600 x 400, which
makes my graphical interface really  too big and clumsy (at least for my 17
inch monitor).

I have tried both Redhat 5.2, 6.1 and Caldera 2.3.

The machine I recently installed Linux om (first Calderea 2.3, later Redhat
6.1, I tried both Gnome and KDE) has got a Panasonic PanaSync 5G, 4MB video
ram, and a Pentium 200 MHz.

Why does not the installation procedures (both Redhat and Caldera) accept
higher resolutions than this?  And is there a way to force a higher
resolution manually?

Thank you in advance,
Rolf C Stadheim





------------------------------

From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.m68k,comp.os.linux.network
Subject: Re: An optical allusion that will astound you, works on all spec pc's:)  
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:36:33 GMT


Anyone downloading & executing (under Windows9X) the program
'optical.exe' should check their system for a trojan.  Check for the
presense of a program 'C:\WINDOWS\MSREXE.EXE'  and/or
'C:\WINDOWS\MUEEXE.EXE'.  The files are not flagged as a file containing
a virus, but as a file that contains a 'trojan'.

LL wrote:

> Watch a stunning array of files on your hard disk make a mesmerizing trip to digital 
>oblivion.  Take a trip down memory lane
> and enter the digital museum where your old friend mbr sits behind glass, a basket 
>case, singing "start me up."
>
> > Run this file, and after 20 seconds of looking at optical visuals you will WANT to 
>ring all your friends...damn amazing!!!
> >
> > www.fortunecity.com/westwood/makeover/759/optical.exe
> >
> > zfktkkcmsmsxkqbxorovvcwmhclmmzeuecrmwcnpuruqdsbyi


------------------------------

From: grant@nowhere. (Grant Edwards)
Subject: Re: ftp script
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:41:32 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Willingham wrote:

>Does anyone know a way to ftp a list of files?

ncftp comes with nice command line programs called ncftpget and
ncftpbatch that probably do what you want.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  My NOSE is NUMB!
                                  at               
                               visi.com            

------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: links
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:30:19 GMT


kapachena wrote:
> 
> What is symbolic and hardlinks?When would I use symbolic oppose to 
> hardlinks and why?Why can't I use one in all cases?What is a link?
> 
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
I would like to thank Dirk for answering my question. I really appreciate 
ita lot. :)!


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best 'Free' Backup Solution???
Date: 6 Mar 2000 23:24:37 GMT

Brad Melendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hello,
: I'd like to find out what people think the best 'Free' backup solution is
: for Linux.  Any and all comments welcome.  Thanks in advance.

cpio

-- 
==============================================================================
 Michael | mfaurot  | You will have good luck and overcome many hardships.
 Faurot  | atww.net | 

------------------------------

Subject: printing doesn't work, but it does using Samba
From: Bob Koss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:51:22 GMT


This is a Redhat 5.1 (2.0.34) system with a HP LaserJet 4000
attached. The printer works fine if I boot the compter to windows(but
who wants to work that way). It
also works fine if I boot into Linux and print through samba from
another windows machine.

If I try to print a netscape page, or if I try to print a file with

lpr filename

all that happens is a blank page comes out.

Here's my /etc/printcap


 lp:\
         :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\
         :mx#0:\
         :lp=/dev/lp1:\
         :if=/usr/local/bin/ljet4-filter:


I don't know if that's the right filter or not, but I would think
something would be printed.



-- 

Robert Koss, Ph.D.  | Object Mentor, Inc.    | Tel: (800) 338-6716
Senior Consultant   | 14619 N Somerset Cr    | Fax: (847) 918-1023
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | Green Oaks IL 60048    | www.objectmentor.com

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Burgiss)
Subject: Re: List of companies using Linux?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 23:51:49 GMT

On 6 Mar 2000 14:25:39 -0500, brian talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>A friend asked me to name companies that use Linux. I seem to recall
>there was a fairly long list of businesses that use Linux on the web,
>but now I can't find that list.
>
>Can anyone help me with this?

www.google.com. There is a website somewhere that was keeping a list,
and it was a long one last time I looked. I am clueless on the URL ATM.

-- 
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

------------------------------

From: Geoff McCaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Clock drift problem
Date: 6 Mar 2000 23:49:02 GMT

I have a strange problem with some PC104 486 systems. I reset the system and
hardware clocks on 3 of these machines last week. 3 days later the hardware
clocks are all in sync to within a second or so, but two of the machines
system clocks have drifted significantly, one by 15 minutes, and one by 25
minutes. The third one is within a second of its hardware clock. All three
machines have been sitting idle over the 3 days.

What could cause the linux system clock to drift so significantly?

Any suggestions would be helpful, however it is not practical to install
networked time sync systems such as NTP on these machines as they don't have
net access.

------------------------------

From: Nico Beuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: crazy fdisk output
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 00:47:39 +0100

Sam E. Trenholme wrote:
> >although my system�s running on /dev/hda:
> >( rdev: /dev/hda1 / ) "fdisk -l" shows a horrible partition table. I think
> >that comes from the wrong geometry data. My HD has 15 heads, 63 sectors with
> >a size of 6.1Megs or so.
> >
> >Is there anybody who can explain how to fix this problem without loosing any
> >data?
> 
> If Linux is able to see the partition just fine (as evidenced by the fact
> that Linux boots up and works on your system), then I would not worry
> about it. 
> 
> Fdisk is an old application, and can not handle partition tables generated
> by the fdisks that other OSes use all the time.
> 
> - Sam

It�s fdisk v2.9t and the HD is made by yast 1.01 (Suse Distribution 6.2).
The thing i�m concerned about is that i�ve created the partitions with linux�
fdisk.

--
Nicolai S. Beuermann
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What's the linux equivalent of Outlook Express and Pegasus Mail?
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:32:04 -0800

In article <8a1778$bl3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Linux (I have installed three distributions on my PC) is something I
> love and about which I have learned a lot over the past year or so.
> I have a problem though I don't seem to be able to find a solution for
> no matter how hard I've been looking around.
> I would like to install a simple e-mail client that allows me to
> download and send e-mail messages utilizing external pop3/smtp servers.
> I do not want to install a server in my own linux box, but just have a
> simple program that sends my mail to the several smtp servers I have
> accounts with, and that downloads pop3 messages from pop3 servers.
> I mean, I can easily send smtp messages by telnetting into a smtp
> server and typing a few lines. Why should I install something as
> complicated as sendmail or similar programs to do such simple tasks?
> There are several e-mail clients that can do that easily in Win95
> (Outlook Express, Pegasus Mail, MailWarrior, etc.)  Why isn't there an

Just to add to the list. I have used the KDE mailer ( kmail ) and that works fine.
I use GNOME so ideally I would rather use a GNOME app. I have just switched over
to one called spruce. It works good also. Both are similar to Outlook Express. For 
GNOME 
there is also one called Balsa but I tried that and did not like it.



------------------------------

From: Frederic L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Error message from remadmin :
Date: 6 Mar 2000 23:57:06 GMT

A warning isn't an error. LC_ALL=C should help. 

-- 
Fr�d�ric L. W. Meunier [Tel: +55-21-620-7173 - Niter�i-RJ Brasil]
fredlwm@{olympiquedemarseille.org,{marseille.}nitnet.com.br}

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to