Linux-Misc Digest #120, Volume #25 Thu, 13 Jul 00 01:13:02 EDT
Contents:
HOW DO I... (Darren Christie)
Re: 1280x1024 Resolution (Martin Brown)
Re: CD Burner woes ("Hiawatha Bray")
Re: Kernel too big ("Victor")
Re: Application required - Word Processor (Christopher Browne)
Re: The search for the Linux / ANSI gfx holy grail (Darryl Perry)
Re: New HDD and Partion Magic or second PC. (Martin Brown)
How to get my machine postable (lzyxt)
Re: Is this a good machine for the money? (brian moore)
Re: The search for the Linux / ANSI gfx holy grail ("Jai ixnay")
Re: COMMERCIAL: Xi Graphics Releases Standardized GUI for Linux ("Gerald Waugh")
Re: How to get my machine postable (David Efflandt)
Re: Linux to Unix print setup (David Efflandt)
Easy Install? Hmmmmmm (N/A)
Easy Install? Hmmmmmmm (N/A)
Easy Install? Hmmmmmmm and Hmmmm (N/A)
PGP signed messages!!! ("Gerald Waugh")
Re: Which one to use (alex)
Re: Linux in China? (alex)
Re: Sound card config problem (David Efflandt)
Re: Incorrect Kernel Version in System.map ("Michael Westerman")
Re: 1280x1024 Resolution (Homer Jay)
PHOTOPAINT INSTALL FAILTURE (Juergen Leeb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Darren Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HOW DO I...
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:45:42 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for all the help that people gave to my prevois posting on kudzu,
pcmcia and sound.
I have a website I maintain for my local church, for which I want to put
a copy of the church magazine on. I wish to put the magazine up as a
pdf, however the original documents are in Word97 format. How do I
convert (using a script if possible to automate the task) into a pdf
under Linux? The magazine is normally held as several Word docs by the
people that produce the church magazine. They are non-techie users, so
getting them to change is not really an option as it may confuse them.
Thanks
Darren
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Brown)
Subject: Re: 1280x1024 Resolution
Date: 13 Jul 2000 03:21:32 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Homer Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In my experience, if XF86Setup can't automatically set up the resolution
>you are left with manually hacking your XF86Config, *including* the
>video timings. I found this next-to-impossible given my monitor manufacturer,
>MAG, refused to supply me with the sync information for my monitor. If you
>really want to do this, read the XFree86-Video-Timings-HOWTO. Hopefully,
>your monitor's manual (or manufacturer) will supply you with the information
>you require.
Gee, my MAG XJ810 came with the sync info right in the manual, and I had
no problem setting it or XFree at 1280x1024 when I installed RH6.1.
--
- Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
NEW!! PGP key id#: CED9BD8A keyserver: keys.pgp.com
------------------------------
From: "Hiawatha Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CD Burner woes
Date: 12 Jul 2000 23:23:45 EDT
Sorry for seeming dense, but what are you talking about? I still don't
understand what commands I'm supposed to type to get cdrecord to work. You
say try LUN0. What do I try with it? Do I add it to a command? Which one?
What exactly am I supposed to do here? Assume I know nothing, which is
pretty much right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On 11 Jul 2000 22:16:04 EDT, Hiawatha Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello again...been out of town for awhile.
> >
> >Anyway, I don't understand what you're saying. My listings are like the
one
> >you describe, but I have eight of them. What do I do to tell the
cdrecord
> >program which one to use? How do I provide this instruction? Thanks.
>
> You should be able to use any of them. Try LUN 0.
>
> [deletia]
>
> --
> Common Standards, Common Ownership.
>
> The alternative only leads to destructive anti-capitalist
> and anti-democratic monopolies.
>
> |||
> / | \
------------------------------
From: "Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel too big
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:28:53 GMT
Is i386 ready for update or what?
Oo, how I wish they would move on to something better.
"Villy Kruse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On 11 Jul 2000 20:22:48 GMT, brian moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, 09 Jul 2000 03:04:43 GMT,
> > Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ooh, I see. So the problem is with the compression routines that zImage
> >> uses? Ok. bzImage suits me just fine as well, I was just curious why it
> >> failed. They should update the output make menuconfig makes because the
> >> instruction it gave was make zImage.
> >
> >No, it's not the compression. ('bzImage' means 'Big zImage', and has
> >nothing to do with 'bzip2'.)
> >
> >It has to do with the way the memory map of an x86 CPU is at boot.
> >That fancy new 800MHz P3 still boots up the same as a 4.77Mhz 8088 for
> >"compatibility" reasons. The 'zImage' uncompresses the kernel into "low
> >memory" (ie, < 640k), the 'bzImage' uncompresses it into "high memory"
> >(ie, > 1M). [The area between 640k and 1M is used by your video card,
> >the BIOS, any bios 'extensions' like SCSI controllers, etc.]
> >
>
>
> Just an ajustment to this description. The bzimage is loaded chunk by
> chink into low memory and moved to high memory. While running the loader
> in real mode the high memory is not accessible, but there is a bios call
> which can move chunks of bytes from low to high memory. Once the bzimage
> is fully loaded the loader switches into protected mode and now it has
> access to all installed memory. The problem this solves is that even
> the compressed kernel dos not fit into low memory int its entirety.
>
>
>
> Villy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Browne)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Application required - Word Processor
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:29:50 GMT
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw a time when Barns would say:
>I've ended up using Galahad from some university (written in 89). I
>specified word processor as opposed to editor as the latter tend not
>to have word wrapping (as best I know) i.e the likes of vi, edit.com
>etc... Galahad is quite functionally rich too - which wasn't a
>requirement.
Actually, vi _does_ provide a way of supporting word wrapping, via the
option "set wrapmargin," which allows you to set a line width, and
"set autoindent," which would result in automatic indentation on
subsequent indented lines.
That may not be exactly what you were expecting, though.
>I really just wanted something to write with. I haven't understood whether
>LaTeX is an editor capable of word wrapping.
LaTeX isn't an editor; it is a document _language_. You enter the
following, using whatever text editor you wish:
\documentclass{article}
\author{Christopher Browne}
\title{My Dumb Article}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
Here is some text.
Another paragraph.
\begin{itemizedlist}
\item One item
\item Another item
\item Still another item
\end{itemizedlist}
\end{document}
into the file "dumbdoc.tex"
Then type the command:
% latex dumbdoc
LaTeX then transforms this into the "device independent" file,
"dumbdoc.dvi".
There are viewers and print filters for just about any device you'd
care to think of, laser printers, and such, and the results will look
quite attractive.
The output is of _HIGH_ quality, and the format is _very_ powerful,
providing tags to support lots of things you'd do in a complex
document, and the _notable_ feature is that LaTeX supports producing
mathematical text of quality unparallelled by _any_ other software.
[Bar none.]
This may be more sophistication than you need.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/dpl.html>
Rules of the Evil Overlord #103. "I will make it clear that I do know
the meaning of the word "mercy"; I simply choose not show them any."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
------------------------------
From: Darryl Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.bbs.unixbbs,alt.bbs.internet,alt.bbs
Subject: Re: The search for the Linux / ANSI gfx holy grail
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:26:49 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ok, first of all to clear up any confusion, when I speak
> of ANSI graphics or just 'ANSI', I am referring to the
> extended IBM character set (ala DOS ansi.sys), paired with
> the appropriate fonts. This sort of 'ANSI' (I realize the
> term is, strictly speaking, wrong) is the basis for 101 dos/
> amiga BBS systems, and is used to make all manner of very
> funky art / banners / etc on those BBSes.
Ahh... If you find what you are looking for here, I would be MOST
interested in hearing about your results and how it is done.
--
-Regards,
Darryl Perry
Cyberia BBS|Sacramento, CA.|916-363-1830|1:203/363
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/8687
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Brown)
Subject: Re: New HDD and Partion Magic or second PC.
Date: 13 Jul 2000 03:41:58 GMT
In article <F8Da5.335$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
G-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Which way should I go, New hard drive and partition magic or buy a second
>computer? To install Linux on.
>=G=
If the machine you already have is signicantly faster than the second
machine you would buy for Linux, buy a second hard drive and System
Commander (a multi-boot program). I've used this combo for years and it
has NEVER FAILED to work properly.
Though I got rid of all M$ junk a year ago, I still use System Commander
to load between DrDOS (still need to run DOS firmware upgrade softs
from time-to-time) and Linux.
Good luck.
--
- Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
NEW!! PGP key id#: CED9BD8A keyserver: keys.pgp.com
------------------------------
From: lzyxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to get my machine postable
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:41:33 GMT
I installed redhat6.2 and I have a static ip,I don't know where to find
the free software to make my machine postable,my Apache is already
working properly!
I am a newbie,please help me!
Thanks a lot
--
I am wondering!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Is this a good machine for the money?
Date: 13 Jul 2000 03:51:42 GMT
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:00:14 GMT,
David Steuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore) writes:
>
> ' tad cheaper. See http://www.aslab.com/ for some nifty machines -- you
> ' may like their prices better, too.)
>
> Thanks for the link. I like their laptops. Whish I could justify
> buying another.
Their 1U and 2U rackmount machines are cheaper than VA's, and still
nifty (I'm waiting for approval to buy a pair of the 2U boxes). You can
do a machine for less than $2K (substantially less if you don't need
dual capability).
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor.
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | If He used Emacs, He'd still be waiting
Usenet Vandal | for it to load on the seventh day.
Netscum, Bane of Elves.
------------------------------
From: "Jai ixnay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.bbs.unixbbs,alt.bbs.internet,alt.bbs
Subject: Re: The search for the Linux / ANSI gfx holy grail
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:15:03 -0500
> Ahh... If you find what you are looking for here, I would be MOST
> interested in hearing about your results and how it is done.
Well I mailed panasync (bitchx author) about it, and he made it
all clear to me. to sum up:
You can switch the console from the latin character set (default) to
the ibmpc character set by doing an ESC(U. You can do this by:
echo -e "\033(U"
After that, ANSI should be fine. There are occasional control-sequence
oddities, but you may be able to fix them by fiddling around with your
terminal definitions. (setterm, tset, terminfo)
Switch back to latin with ESC(B:
echo -e "\033(B"
This really is so trivial that I will assume that somewhere, hidden
away on my harddrive, there is a detailed description of this
behaviour. But I know I'm far from the only one who is still in
the dark. anyone else who wanted to know, whether to telnet into bbses
or have ansi-art in your shell or whatever else... now you know. ;)
thanks pana
-jai
------------------------------
From: "Gerald Waugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: COMMERCIAL: Xi Graphics Releases Standardized GUI for Linux
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:22:24 -0400
Debbie Kreuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
Debbie
Why are you sending a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE to a newsgroup??? It's MESSY!!!
And women think they are smarter than men!!! <wry-grin>
Gerald
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: How to get my machine postable
Date: 13 Jul 2000 04:24:34 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:41:33 GMT, lzyxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed redhat6.2 and I have a static ip,I don't know where to find
>the free software to make my machine postable,my Apache is already
>working properly!
>I am a newbie,please help me!
What do you mean by 'postable'? If you mean to send and receive e-mail,
that should simply work if the hostname of your box is the fully qualified
domain name for your static IP, unless you mucked up your smtp server.
If you mean to get your box listed in search engines, I don't know. But
first you would need some content that someone is interested in.
If you mean use POST method for a web form, do you have a simple CGI
working that is able to return something to your browser? Then in the
shell type: perldoc CGI
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Linux to Unix print setup
Date: 13 Jul 2000 04:28:49 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:30:12 GMT, scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>WE already have smb.conf configured on unix and printing can be done from
>all Windows machines. The problem is that we cannot get it to work under
>Linux Mandrake 7.0?
Have you listed the hostnames allowed to print to the print server in
/etc/hosts.lpg on that box. I never did find docs for that file, but
making it a list of hostnames (or possibly IP's) of boxes allowed to print
worked for me.
>From there is is simply a matter of using the printtool on the remote to
set up a remote printer.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: N/A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Easy Install? Hmmmmmm
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:30:05 GMT
i have set my monitor specifications and everything correct for corel
linux but when i go into linux the display is just too big and it extends
beyond my monitor barriers and i cant see it all? what would be the
problem and how do i fix it?
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: N/A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Easy Install? Hmmmmmmm
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:30:05 GMT
i have set my monitor specifications and everything correct for corel
linux but when i go into linux the display is just too big and it extends
beyond my monitor barriers and i cant see it all? what would be the
problem and how do i fix it? thanks so damn much.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: N/A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Easy Install? Hmmmmmmm and Hmmmm
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:30:06 GMT
i have set my monitor specifications and everything correct for corel
linux but when i go into linux the display is just too big and it extends
beyond my monitor barriers and i cant see it all? what would be the
problem and how do i fix it? thanks so much.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: "Gerald Waugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PGP signed messages!!!
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:33:36 -0400
Why does everyone on this newsgroup send
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
There message!!!
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBOWyiTlrUI/eHXJZ5AQHfPAQAgRVwrKV4Ef/sOW0tW5lTd+jzQRsuEiDg
wxNo4LEiZIUYjA39Ex1F2DDr+UYSfBB/VhqfkVMOrVJRgb+5TgOwtIOxfEP2pRKl
T2lismUO6WqB/qdhGu08nAPAWhwmo8Qq+SSDZpFiNGQhXsOyhSz4UuiQiCZWL8my
TLANf6AZeEs=
=aLAO
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
Don't you know that there are places in this world where every byte of data
in a message is costing the reader money?
Newsgroup members, please excuse me for sending this (more trash), which may
also cost some readers a little money! I am just tired of having my
resources and Internet bandwith used to store and move useless TRASH!!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alex)
Subject: Re: Which one to use
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:43:08 GMT
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:36:29 -0700, "conduit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi, I am looking to re-experience installing
>linux on my computer.
>After two years i think it is time to try
>a different distribution. I am looking at either
>Slack
>SuSE or
>Debian.
>Now i know there must be some
>opinions out there.
>So join in on the debate.....
>Which is best ??
>
Now you've done it. Distributions are almost like religions to some
people. Everybody has an opinion and is convinced theirs is the best.
Personally, I like slack. If you are willing to put in time and
effort, the distribution will not dissapoint you. It is stable and
highly customizable and has a pretty good installer There are many
quirks but all distributions have their own quirks . . .
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alex)
Subject: Re: Linux in China?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:44:13 GMT
On 12 Jul 2000 13:37:37 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>James Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Red Flag Linux was put together by a research lab of China, funded by
>> the govt.
>
>I can't help noticing the similiarity in the name with 'Red Hat' Linux.
>Is 'Red Flag' Linux based on the 'Red Hat' distribution or is that just
>a coincidence?
Chinese government . . . china . . . china's flag . . . get the
drift? :-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Sound card config problem
Date: 13 Jul 2000 04:55:31 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:18:38 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm having a problem getting my sound card (Creative Labs Sound Blaster
>16C PnP) to work on my system (Debian Linux. Kernel 2.2.14. Dell
>Dimension XPS T550). this machine is a dual boot NT/Linux. Sound works
>perfectly in NT. The soundcard properties that the Audio device in NT
>was set up with indicate that the following ports should be OK for use
>with soundcard: IO=0x330, 0x388; DMA=anything but 03; IRQ=anything but
>10. Using this information i have been trying to get sound up in Linux.
>After doing a pnpdump into /etc/isapnp.conf, I uncommented what seemed
>to be the appropriate lines for this sound card.
>My /etc/isapnp.conf basically now reads:
I cannot help you with the PnP end of it, but I do have an SB16. I am
curious if 0x388 is the
proper port to specify in isapnp.conf. Typically that is used for opl3
module, which may be used along with sb, but not by the sb module. The
typical sb port is 0x220 which I think is the only one that uses irq's.
This is in my /etc/conf.modules generated by RedHat sndconfig:
alias sound sb
pre-install sound /sbin/insmod sound dmabuf=1
alias midi opl3
options opl3 io=0x388
options sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=3 dma16=7 mpu_io=0x330
>I issue 'isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf' and I get the following out:
>
> Board 1 has Identity e5 ff ff ff ff 70 00 8c 0e: CTL0070 Serial No -1
>[checksum e5]
> CTL0070/-1[0]{Audio }: Port 0x388; IRQ5 DMA1 DMA5
>---Enabled OK
>
>
>No errors, this is good. But then I issue 'modprobe sb io=0x0388 irq=5
>dma=1 dma16=5' (sb being the driver that I think is most appropriate for
>my card) and I get:
You are definitely using the wrong port here. Should be io=0x220
>I've tried many many different values for IRQ and DMA following the
>"Hint" advice - but i still get the same damn error mesgs! When I do an
>lsmod I get:
>
> Module Size Used by
> soundcore 2372 0 (autoclean)
> lockd 30632 1 (autoclean)
> sunrpc 51588 1 (autoclean) [lockd]
> ntfs 33640 0 (unused)
> msdos 5276 0 (unused)
> fat 28800 0 [msdos]
> 3c59x 18336 1
The related sound modules are (your size may vary):
opl3 11208 0
sb 33620 0
uart401 5968 0 [sb]
sound 57228 0 [opl3 sb uart401]
soundcore 2372 6 [sb sound]
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: "Michael Westerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Incorrect Kernel Version in System.map
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:01:57 +1000
also instrested (i deleted mine to avoid that message with out any known
adverse effect.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Homer Jay)
Subject: Re: 1280x1024 Resolution
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:00:45 -0600
On 13 Jul 2000 03:21:32 GMT, Martin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Homer Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>In my experience, if XF86Setup can't automatically set up the resolution
>>you are left with manually hacking your XF86Config, *including* the
>>video timings. I found this next-to-impossible given my monitor manufacturer,
>>MAG, refused to supply me with the sync information for my monitor. If you
>>really want to do this, read the XFree86-Video-Timings-HOWTO. Hopefully,
>>your monitor's manual (or manufacturer) will supply you with the information
>>you require.
>
>Gee, my MAG XJ810 came with the sync info right in the manual, and I had
>no problem setting it or XFree at 1280x1024 when I installed RH6.1.
> - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Gee... mine didn't. Golly gosh darn. Next time, post something useful.
---no pgp information available at this time Mr. Spock---
------------------------------
From: Juergen Leeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PHOTOPAINT INSTALL FAILTURE
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:00:18 +0200
Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format.
==============F833BD42D35E34569C8CCEDE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I tried to install Corel Photopaint for linux on my Suse 6.4 system.
The installion procedure works fine.
But at the first start, when wine is should be set up i get following
error message:
err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0
addr
Does somebody know how to solve this problem?
Thanks for help!!!!!
juergen leeb
==============F833BD42D35E34569C8CCEDE
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="juergen.leeb.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Visitenkarte f�r Juergen Leeb
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="juergen.leeb.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Leeb;Juergen
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fn:Juergen Leeb
end:vcard
==============F833BD42D35E34569C8CCEDE==
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
