Linux-Misc Digest #446, Volume #25 Mon, 14 Aug 00 14:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: export-command ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: FWD: Red Hat's CFO abandoning ship. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: File Sharing on Dual Boot (Tony Lawrence)
Re: How to redirect serial port to eth0? (Grant Edwards)
Re: Passing command to Telnet with a text file (Tony Lawrence)
Re: Dreamweaver port for Linux? (blowfish)
Re: OH MY GOD!!! ("Jason")
Re: cronjob: disable email notice (Lily Fu)
Re: Kernel 2.2.17-pre* (Markus Kossmann)
Re: Linux on AMD (blowfish)
Re: Linux on AMD (blowfish)
Re: Linux on AMD (blowfish)
Re: Dual NICs of same type? (Dances With Crows)
Re: Linux on AMD (blowfish)
Re: Accessing NTSC-partitions (Dances With Crows)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: export-command
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:12:46 +0100
Hubert Ming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> dear lingurx
> i'd like to export a few environments-variables on linux-box. so i created a
> small script (export_it) which contains my exports:
> export http_proxy=http://proxy.s1.ch:8080/
> export ftp_proxy=http://proxy.s1.ch:8080/
> .........
> to run the script now i simply can activate my export_it-script. but the
> export's are not set in bash-shell from which i started the script. how can
> i export the 'export-script' in my shell...
Instead of calling it expicitly, use source export_it-script.
This runs it from within the current shell, and allows the variables to
propagate.
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FWD: Red Hat's CFO abandoning ship.
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:21:28 +0100
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> Andrew Halliwell writes:
>> Never heard of the /*comment*/? All good source code has it. Even if
>> they can't understand what the code itself does, the comments will
>> explain it.
> Good comments don't tell you what the code does, they tell you why it does
> it.
Granted. But it's still can be understandable to those not technically
minded. Cartainly more than one of Blows Hex Dumps.
:)
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: Tony Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: File Sharing on Dual Boot
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:09:14 -0400
Dances With Crows wrote:
> If you have a LoseModem (often mistakenly called "WinModem"), rip it out
> of your computer, sell it to a stupid person, and go buy a Real Modem
> (defined as an external modem that connects to the machine using a DB9
> serial port. $50 US or so.) They're easy to set up in Linux, and
> provide better throughput+fewer disconnects no matter what OS you're
> using in my experience.
A small list of reasons not to use internal modems:
o External modems are only a few dollars more than internal.
o Internal modems are just one more damn thing using the
precious few interrupts your computer has.
o Internal modems take up a slot that you might need someday
for something else.
o Modems can get so confused that only shutting them off
will clear their problem. You don't want to shut off your
server when that happens, do you?
o If lightning comes down your phone line (it happens) and
you have an internal modem, your whole computer is likely to
be fried. With an external modem, you'll lose the modem,
but probably not anything else.
o You can see what's going on with an external modem. You
can see when the modem is receiving, transmitting,
handshaking- much easier to diagnose problems.
o You can share an external modem between multiple computers
either manually or by an A/B box- again this facilitates
testing and is sometimes very convenient.
o When you upgrade your computer, swapping the modem is much
easier.
o When you finally get your cable modem, DSL line or T1 :-),
you might actually be able to sell that external modem, but
used internal cards are near worthless.
--
Tony Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux articles, help, book reviews, tests,
job listings and more : http://www.pcunix.com/Linux/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Edwards)
Subject: Re: How to redirect serial port to eth0?
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 17:12:59 GMT
In article <8n8oqa$pld$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mihaly Gyulai wrote:
>I have a data stream coming in a serial port.
>
>I wish to redirect the data stream to eth0 (?) and to capture it with
>TCP (?) in another machine on the intranet.
netcat
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! Is this sexual
at intercourse yet?? Is it,
visi.com huh, is it??
------------------------------
From: Tony Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Passing command to Telnet with a text file
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:24:13 -0400
Richard Lewis wrote:
>
> Hi People
>
> Is it possible to pass a series of commands to a telnet session from a
> text file? eg. using a command like "telnet <commands.txt", where
> commands.txt would consist of a series of commands.
Yes, use "expect"
See http://pcunix.com/Books/expect.html and, of course, "man
expect"
That's the general solution for controlling telnet, but for
your specific question
> The purpose of this is to automate a telnet session on port 25 (the
> SMTP port) of a mail server. My commands.txt file looks something like
> this:
you could use sendmail directly or even just call one of the
command-line mailers like mutt, fastmail, mailto etc. -
"apropos mail" will give you a list of what you have
immediately available and there's many more out there
including Perl modules and on and on and on..
--
Tony Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux articles, help, book reviews, tests,
job listings and more : http://www.pcunix.com/Linux
------------------------------
From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ..
Subject: Re: Dreamweaver port for Linux?
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:28:24 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if Macromedia has any such plans?
>
> Dreamweaver is an incredibly good program, but
> I think it only runs on Windows and Mac at the
> moment.
>
> --
>
> Neil
There was something called "Swift" before. I don't know if it still exists. But
it's very similar to Dreamweaver and Flash. In fact. It can utilized the Flash
plug-in. And it's native Linux.
I played with it about 2 years ago, it can do a lot of flashy things too, but
never care about it. I use Easy Edit for my all purpose text, html editor.
So. You might want to search around for "Swift."
--
- Alex / blowfish.- Just an average, whimpy, non-geek American computer user.
(Have Fun with geek's culture:-Version
2.4-pre-release99999-test-1234567.pre-beta5000.)
- If Vi is God's editor. Then, God must have too much free time on his hands,
lives a very dull and unproductive life; so he needs Vi to waste his time.
But Vi was still too fast. So God created EMACS on the 8th day - which takes
Eight Months to load, And Counting Still...
- The UN-GEEK CODE:(?What is a geek?)-#!?+++??++++|$????+++++?????+++!!!!???+++---
geek + vi | ~/emacs ==>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!.......:P~
newbies + Windoz | C:\LOOKOUT
EXPRESS==>_the_horrors_the_horrrrrrrroOOOOORRRRRRRRRSSSSzzzzz!!! :-|
- My SAS (Sing-A-Song) Fingerprint -v.i007.bond: Doe1(-a deer, a female deer.)
RaY2(- a drop of golden sun.)
Me3(- A name, I call myself.) FAr4(- A long, long way to run.) Sew5(-A needle
pulling thread.)
lA6(-A note to follow sew.) TeA7(-A drink with jam and bread.) That will bring
us back to DOe-oh-oh-oh.
(c)Copyrighted by Alex / blowfish-2000 All Rights Reserved.
------------------------------
From: "Jason" <Jason(AT)cyborgworkshop.com>
Subject: Re: OH MY GOD!!!
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:28:03 -0500
what that usually means is that LILO and your BIOS are in disagreement over
your drive geometry. How large of a hard drive do you have? What kind of
computer do you have? If its a clone, do you have Award/AMI/Phoenix etc
BIOS? When in doubt, change your BIOS to look at your hard drive in LBA
mode, reboot on a floppy and run LILO, then see what happens. Good Luck.
--
Jason
www.cyborgworkshop.com
...and the geek shall inherit the earth...
------------------------------
From: Lily Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cronjob: disable email notice
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:34:34 -0400
Thank you very much. Appreciated your reply.
Lily
Andreas Kahari wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Lily Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >For some reason, I need to set up a cronjob running every minute.
> >The cronjob then sends me an email notice everytime the program
> >runs, the emails clogged my email box.
> >
> >Is there a way to disable the email notice from cronjob?
> >
> >I am using RedHat 6.1
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Lily
> >
>
> Redirect the output of STDOUT and STDERR to "/dev/null" by appending
> "> /dev/null 2>&1" to the command line in the crontab file.
>
> /A
>
> --
> # Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>.
> # ...brought to you from Uppsala, Sweden.
> # All junk e-mail is reported to the appropriate authorities.
> # Criticism, cynicism and irony available free of charge.
------------------------------
From: Markus Kossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.17-pre*
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:58:51 +0200
Mark Hymers wrote:
[..]
> I have been told that upgrading to the latest
> 2.2.17-pre* (i.e. test) version of the kernel will help but I can't
> find it at kernel.org. Can anyone tell me where I can get the latest
> version either as a whole or as a patch file from 2.2.16.
>
Alan Cox maintains the 2.2.x kernels . So you will find it it on
kernel.org ... /pub/linux/kernel/people/alan.
--
Markus Kossmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ..
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Linux on AMD
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:43:23 -0700
"David C." wrote:
>
> blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Exactly. Isn't that the main advantage and reason to use opensource
> > stuff? ;-)
> >
> > If they just want everything by default, and .RPM every apps. Why not
> > just stick with Windoz?
>
> The world isn't black and white. You may find it hard to believe, but
> there actually exist people who don't want to build everything by hand,
> and yet don't want to run Windows.
>
There's a very easy solution for that too. :-)
Open/Free-BSD. ;-)
cd to the ports tree,
Just pick the app you want.
eg: cd /usr/ports/mysql123.tar.gz
make ; make install ; make clean
That's it. Everything will be build from source. All dependency files fetched, MD5
checked, patched, build, make, install all done automatically, and custom tailord,
configured to YOUR machine; WITHOUT any baby sitting.
And you can CVS to updated the source everynight automatically.
Or do a make world to update the whole system.
No pain, no mess. Start it. Go out, go to bed. Find something else to do. ;-)
.RPM sucks big time, anyway.
> -- David
--
- Alex / blowfish.- Just an average, whimpy, non-geek American computer user.
(Have Fun with geek's culture:-Version
2.4-pre-release99999-test-1234567.pre-beta5000.)
- If Vi is God's editor. Then, God must have too much free time on his hands,
lives a very dull and unproductive life; so he needs Vi to waste his time.
But Vi was still too fast. So God created EMACS on the 8th day - which takes
Eight Months to load, And Counting Still...
- The UN-GEEK CODE:(?What is a geek?)-#!?+++??++++|$????+++++?????+++!!!!???+++---
geek + vi | ~/emacs ==>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!.......:P~
newbies + Windoz | C:\LOOKOUT
EXPRESS==>_the_horrors_the_horrrrrrrroOOOOORRRRRRRRRSSSSzzzzz!!! :-|
- My SAS (Sing-A-Song) Fingerprint -v.i007.bond: Doe1(-a deer, a female deer.)
RaY2(- a drop of golden sun.)
Me3(- A name, I call myself.) FAr4(- A long, long way to run.) Sew5(-A needle
pulling thread.)
lA6(-A note to follow sew.) TeA7(-A drink with jam and bread.) That will bring
us back to DOe-oh-oh-oh.
------------------------------
From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ..
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Linux on AMD
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:45:51 -0700
Tony Lawrence wrote:
>
> "David C." wrote:
> >
> > blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Exactly. Isn't that the main advantage and reason to use opensource
> > > stuff? ;-)
> > >
> > > If they just want everything by default, and .RPM every apps. Why not
> > > just stick with Windoz?
> >
> > The world isn't black and white. You may find it hard to believe, but
> > there actually exist people who don't want to build everything by hand,
> > and yet don't want to run Windows.
>
> Even people who can build by hand sometimes just want dumb
> and simple, at least to start with.
>
> For example, after many years of having a SCO machine as my
> personal desktop, I'm about to switch to Linux (I've been
> running a few Linux boxes here for a few years but they have
> not been my main desktop).
>
> I want as little work as possible when I do that.
> Basically, I want to install the dist, configure it as
> painlessly as possible and be up and running with 99%
> functionality as quickly as possible. Lazy? You betcha.
> I'm definitely going with something as user friendly as
> possible, probably Caldera since they've bought SCO and I
> expect some of the mannerisms I'm used to will find their
> way into the product sooner rather than later.
>
Don't bet too much on Caldera. It's broke, and probably will drag SCO down with
it.
> --
> Tony Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Linux articles, help, book reviews, tests,
> job listings and more : http://www.pcunix.com/Linux/
--
- Alex / blowfish.- Just an average, whimpy, non-geek American computer user.
(Have Fun with geek's culture:-Version
2.4-pre-release99999-test-1234567.pre-beta5000.)
- If Vi is God's editor. Then, God must have too much free time on his hands,
lives a very dull and unproductive life; so he needs Vi to waste his time.
But Vi was still too fast. So God created EMACS on the 8th day - which takes
Eight Months to load, And Counting Still...
- The UN-GEEK CODE:(?What is a geek?)-#!?+++??++++|$????+++++?????+++!!!!???+++---
geek + vi | ~/emacs ==>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!.......:P~
newbies + Windoz | C:\LOOKOUT
EXPRESS==>_the_horrors_the_horrrrrrrroOOOOORRRRRRRRRSSSSzzzzz!!! :-|
- My SAS (Sing-A-Song) Fingerprint -v.i007.bond: Doe1(-a deer, a female deer.)
RaY2(- a drop of golden sun.)
Me3(- A name, I call myself.) FAr4(- A long, long way to run.) Sew5(-A needle
pulling thread.)
lA6(-A note to follow sew.) TeA7(-A drink with jam and bread.) That will bring
us back to DOe-oh-oh-oh.
------------------------------
From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ..
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Linux on AMD
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:02:26 -0700
Craig Bingman wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, blowfish <..> wrote:
> >If they just want everything by default, and .RPM every apps. Why
> >not just stick with Windoz?
> >--
> >- Alex / blowfish.-
>
> Maybe it is their first experience with linux. Maybe they are just sick
> of using an operating system that falls apart when its web browser crashes.
> There are as many reasons for starting with a stock distribution of linux
> and keeping it relatively simple at first as there are disgruntled
> Microsoft Windows users.
>
> If you have an interest in Linux becoming truly mainstream, then this
> attitude is really counterproductive.
>
> Craig
>
You know what?
Actually it's very easy to show a newbie how to build from source.
I showed my cousin how to do it twice (spent a total of just a little over an
hour.) And she was able to do it.
Her computer experience was limited to the Mac before her husband bought a pc a
month ago. She has never even installed a single app by herself in her life.
After she seen me doing it twice, she tried and succeeded on her first try, and
her command was "Oh! That's easy." And she managed to install SuSE 6.4 all by
herself from scratch.
The problem is all the media and "guru" hypes that make everyday people turn away
from *nix. Because they have to show off how superiour they are. Shits. They're
lamers. They insists on using the dragged vi and emacs, and such ancient,
counter-productive tools.
Those who insists on using vi and emacs have too much free time on their hands,
and nothing to do with their life. :-0
If I want to make my computing life miserable. I'll stay with Windoz, vi and emacs
on *nix.
But non of my *nix boxes even have vi or emacs installed. These are the first
things I trash from any *nix boxes under my control.
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < New Primary E-Mail Address
> http://fpage1.ba.best.com/~cbingman
--
- Alex / blowfish.- Just an average, whimpy, non-geek American computer user.
(Have Fun with geek's culture:-Version
2.4-pre-release99999-test-1234567.pre-beta5000.)
- If Vi is God's editor. Then, God must have too much free time on his hands,
lives a very dull and unproductive life; so he needs Vi to waste his time.
But Vi was still too fast. So God created EMACS on the 8th day - which takes
Eight Months to load, And Counting Still...
- The UN-GEEK CODE:(?What is a geek?)-#!?+++??++++|$????+++++?????+++!!!!???+++---
geek + vi | ~/emacs ==>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!.......:P~
newbies + Windoz | C:\LOOKOUT
EXPRESS==>_the_horrors_the_horrrrrrrroOOOOORRRRRRRRRSSSSzzzzz!!! :-|
- My SAS (Sing-A-Song) Fingerprint -v.i007.bond: Doe1(-a deer, a female deer.)
RaY2(- a drop of golden sun.)
Me3(- A name, I call myself.) FAr4(- A long, long way to run.) Sew5(-A needle
pulling thread.)
lA6(-A note to follow sew.) TeA7(-A drink with jam and bread.) That will bring
us back to DOe-oh-oh-oh.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Dual NICs of same type?
Date: 14 Aug 2000 18:04:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 17:17:34 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>I'm new to Linux, but just about to configure a setup like this for a cable
>modeem (sorry - I have a French flatmate). I haven't started yet, but was
>lucky enough to stumble upon this thread.
>
>I've got a modern Realtek super-cheapo imitation-NE2000 10/100mbit 10-baseT
>PCI card for my home LAN & have just bought 2nd-hand an apparently ancient
>3Com Etherlink III ISA 3C509B which has the 10-base2 connector to fit the
>cable modeem. Any idea which will install as eth0...? Is there any way to
>force the ISA card to eth0..? Is that necessary...?
In /etc/conf.modules :
alias eth0 3c509
options 3c509 irq=X
alias eth1 rtl8139 # change to "ne2k-pci" if this is an 8019/8029...
options eth1 XXXX # whatever it needs
It is certainly not necessary to force your gateway card to be eth0
unless you want it to be. BTW, those ancient 3c509s are pretty solid
cards, and yours just might perform better than the NE2K clone despite
its being ISA!
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Those who do not understand Unix are
http://www.brainbench.com / condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
=============================/ ==Henry Spencer
------------------------------
From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ..
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Linux on AMD
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:06:45 -0700
Craig Bingman wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, blowfish <..> wrote:
> >If they just want everything by default, and .RPM every apps. Why
> >not just stick with Windoz?
> >--
> >- Alex / blowfish.-
>
> Maybe it is their first experience with linux. Maybe they are just sick
> of using an operating system that falls apart when its web browser crashes.
> There are as many reasons for starting with a stock distribution of linux
> and keeping it relatively simple at first as there are disgruntled
> Microsoft Windows users.
>
Do you think Linux distro like Redhat really any better than Windoz?
R = Repair / Rebuild
E = Everyday... or
D = Die
H = Have
A = A
T = Turkey
Linux like Redhat is total junks. No wonder RH is now tring to get into the
appliances business, like cell phone. It's not going to last as an OS hack.
> If you have an interest in Linux becoming truly mainstream, then this
> attitude is really counterproductive.
>
> Craig
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < New Primary E-Mail Address
> http://fpage1.ba.best.com/~cbingman
--
- Alex / blowfish.- Just an average, whimpy, non-geek American computer user.
(Have Fun with geek's culture:-Version
2.4-pre-release99999-test-1234567.pre-beta5000.)
- If Vi is God's editor. Then, God must have too much free time on his hands,
lives a very dull and unproductive life; so he needs Vi to waste his time.
But Vi was still too fast. So God created EMACS on the 8th day - which takes
Eight Months to load, And Counting Still...
- The UN-GEEK CODE:(?What is a geek?)-#!?+++??++++|$????+++++?????+++!!!!???+++---
geek + vi | ~/emacs ==>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!.......:P~
newbies + Windoz | C:\LOOKOUT
EXPRESS==>_the_horrors_the_horrrrrrrroOOOOORRRRRRRRRSSSSzzzzz!!! :-|
- My SAS (Sing-A-Song) Fingerprint -v.i007.bond: Doe1(-a deer, a female deer.)
RaY2(- a drop of golden sun.)
Me3(- A name, I call myself.) FAr4(- A long, long way to run.) Sew5(-A needle
pulling thread.)
lA6(-A note to follow sew.) TeA7(-A drink with jam and bread.) That will bring
us back to DOe-oh-oh-oh.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: Accessing NTSC-partitions
Date: 14 Aug 2000 18:08:31 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 Aug 2000 23:41:00 +0100, Sandy Drobic wrote:
>When on 13.08.00 I read a letter from Dances With Crows
>about: "Re: Accessing NTSC-partitions",
>I decided to do war and invoked my tribal gods with:
>> If you mean "NTFS", write support for NTFS partitions is in the
>> experimental stages and trying it out can easily corrupt your
>> filesystem. You must either recompile the kernel or compile a couple of
>> modules, saying Y or M to "NTFS Read Support" and "NTFS Write Support
>> (DANGEROUS)" inside of "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig".
>
>I know, in SuSE Linux 6.3 I have already destroyed the filesystem of one
>NTSF-Partition. Now, in SuSE 6.4, I can only find the readonly option.
There's an option in the kernel config that says "Prompt for development
or incomplete drivers." It's under "Code Maturity Level Ooptions." If
you don't activate that option, then many of the more dangerous options
will be disabled. HTH,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Those who do not understand Unix are
http://www.brainbench.com / condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
=============================/ ==Henry Spencer
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
