Linux-Misc Digest #931, Volume #25                Tue, 3 Oct 00 10:13:03 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Booting: --- Invalid Compressed Format ---, ah? ("PeZ")
  slow? (Jeph Herrin)
  A dumb networking question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: How to silence a linux box? (John Forkosh)
  Re: CD ROM Mount Problem  RedHat 6.2 ("simon")
  Re: What do I do with EXIM on a laptop? (Juergen Sauer)
  Re: Should I jump into Linux? (Hartmann Schaffer)
  Mandrake 7.1 - partition 85 plz help (gpf)
  Re: Linux on Laptop (Robert Heller)
  Re: TCSH core dump (Terry Gliedt)
  how to enable ftpd (Mandrake 7 User)
  Mail API for Linux (John Lodge)
  samba and windoze 98 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Mail API for Linux (Lew Pitcher)
  searching for cpu performance over a network * * * * (David Lia)
  Re: samba and windoze 98 (Patrick M Geahan)
  Re: AMD Duron & Kernel Panic (Jacek)
  Re: Recording audio output to disk? (Dave Phillips)
  Kernel version in Slackware circa 1995 and RedHat 4.x (Bruce)
  Re: Not allow mount file system (Beggar)
  Re: Wierd Lilo problem
  Disable booting message? (Beggar)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "PeZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Booting: --- Invalid Compressed Format ---, ah?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:53:44 +0200

the same problems appear in Netbooting Configurations.
i think the bootimages have a false offset or so for the compressed
image ... didn't get behind too....... my solution was to make a very
small(mininmal set of progs)
uncompressed bootimage



------------------------------

From: Jeph Herrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: slow?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:22:20 +0200


i'm a new linux/old unix user who has just installed redhat 6.2
on a cyrix 686/166Hz machine with 64MB ram. it's not
top dollar hardware, but I'm still a bit discouraged by how
slow linux runs. using the Gnome/Enlightenment combination,
it takes palpable seconds to get shell window open, on the order
of a minute for graphical apps. is this normal?

the system monitor shows all the ram, with most of it (~55mb)
in use with no apps running. i don't seem to have any hoggy
processes running in the back, and i've got a 250MB swap file
(which, however, sometimes is flagged as FAILED for shut
down while halting the machine). the video card has 1MB,
not a lot, but it shouldn't make the machine crawl (should it?).

my last unix box was an old sparc with 32mb of ram and solaris 5,
it flew in comparison to this. is there something i should look for?
should i bag the hardware, the os, or both?

addendum: i installed with 32mb of ram, but doubled this shortly
thereafter; do i need to tell the kernel something about this? i figured
since the system monitor tool picked it up, i was set.

thanks for any tips,
jeph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A dumb networking question
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:23:57 GMT

Hi all,
I've just recently installed SuSE 7 on my pc. I've networked several
machines and they can address each other with no problems.

As soon as i connect to the internet i can't ping a particular machine.
I know this has something to do with the routing table on the machine
that is on the internet.

anyone have any ideas ???

Thanks in advance

Matt



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Forkosh)
Subject: Re: How to silence a linux box?
Date: 3 Oct 2000 11:55:35 GMT

Robert Clayton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: PS - if the machine will only be a router, you can possibly remove the
: hard disks altogether, as there is a linux router kernel which fits on a
: floppy.  This could help the noise as well.  Look on the web for the linux
: router project home, I'm sorry I don't remember the URL

It's
     http://www.linuxrouter.org
Highly recommended.


: Tijmen Stam wrote:
: > > I like to setup a linux box as internet gateway, voice box etc.
: > > My hardware is a rather old P200-64MB.
: > > Are there ways to silence the machine? Like switching off the hard
: > > disks or so? Power saving is also of interest.
: > > What os-independent methods can be applied ( Dampening the
: > > housing,...)?

------------------------------

From: "simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: CD ROM Mount Problem  RedHat 6.2
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:59:35 GMT

try using
mount -t iso9660 -v  /dev/cdrom/ mnt/cdrom
"ascii7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:aZaC5.18053$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What command are you using to mount the CD?
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm a Linux newbie switching from WinNT to Red Hat 6.2. The Red Hat
> > installed perfectly from a CDROM that  came with the Osborne book. I
> > created the boot disk from the CD ROM on WinNT and then installed the
> > Linux 6.2 system.
> >
> > I can mount floppies, but cannot mont the same (or any other) CD ROM
> > to get to the RPMs. I get the message "Wrong medium type" when I try
> > to mount the cdrom.
> >
> > Any ideas or help will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>



------------------------------

From: Juergen Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: What do I do with EXIM on a laptop?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:47:03 +0000 (UTC)

Jerome Mrozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb
am Mon, 02 Oct 2000 22:19:25 -0500 in comp.os.linux.misc:
> I've just installed a Debian system and its primary email program seems
> to be the exim package.

> My primary experience to date has been with Windows, and I use Navigator
> to handle my email, etc.  It means I've not administered my own mail
> before.

> I'm aware that my own system will send me mail (login attempts, etc). 
> Does this mean I need a mail handler installed, or can I just install a
> mail reader like pine?

You have to some updates to your mind and understandings before you can
go on. You have to read some more Dokumentations.

Ok, I'll give you some hints.

Be clear, what you want to do.
        a) Mail reading/writing (online/offline) ?
           then you will be happy with a isdn/modem internet setup,
           domain names service (DNS) forwarder and Netscape.

        b) do a own Mailserver on the Notebook ?
           then you will have to setup:
           Internetconnection, DNS Services, eMail Server EXIM, POP3/IMAP
           Server ... much stuff.
           I did this years ago with exim 1.x and my Notebook (Linux 1.x)
           to keep Mail running on a big company (6500 Mailaccounts).
           Was nessesary due a crash of the two primary Mailservers.
           Exim & Linux did the job very well. None of the employees did
           recognized the fault, because after break down and relauch
           was only 30 Minutes.

        c) a little bit intelligenter setup for your mail & news on your
           notebook could be nice to have DNS, EXIM (+UUCP), SQUID, INN
           configured for a dialup internet connection.

In fact Exim is a SMTP eMail SERVER. It's not a Reader or Frontend for
the user. Exim accepts on port 25 SMTP connections, processes and delivers
them. Exim replaces sendmail.

b) and c) are not for Linux novices. But are a fine starting point to learn
more to do this by your self.

-- 
J�rgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer)
Subject: Re: Should I jump into Linux?
Date: 2 Oct 2000 21:25:05 -0400

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>It's easy for me not to hate it.  I don't dig into
>the nuts and bolts of it, I just use it.

i really can't say much about it since i never really used it
(occasionally helping out a friend with a windows machine and hating
every minute of it), but ... i didn't touch dos because compared to
unix it was too gigantic a step backwards,  i diodn't touch windows
because i had both os/2 and linux running when they came out with 95,
and compared to those two it simply didn't offer anything that would
make me switch.

>       It's easy to access all the software I need,
>it's easy and intuitive to manage the files I create, 
>and I can easily get and share information.

most linux distributions now come with KDE and / or GNOME (which i
prefer) which give you the same kind of user navigation as windows,
with a few extras that windows users can't even dream of (multiple
desk tops e.g.).  details probably differ, but the concepr is about
the same, so it shouldn't be very difficult to get used to (online
help, to the extent that it's available, is better)

>       I understand there are stability problems, and
>I probably crash a couple of times a week.  This is
>annoying.  But, everything I need to do always seems
>to be at my fingertips.  I never have to go to some
>manual to figure out the correct command to type in at
>a prompt.
>
>       Now my initial post was a question about the
>advantages of going to Linux.  You're reply was a
>question, not an answer.  I'd be interested to here your
>view about the advantages.  I should also point out, that
>I'm not totally ignorant of Unix.  The last two summers
>I've worked at a government lab using SGI High Impact
>workstations.  I appreciate the stability, but I was constantly
>asking questions about what commands I needed to do simple
>computer tasks.

if you have enough disk space left, you can install linux next to
windows on your computer, being able to chose when you boot.  there
are also two systems available that let you run your windows programs
under linux:  wine (gpled, ships with many distributions) and VMware
(commercial, about $400(?), gets very good reviews by its users).  so
you can try it out without taking windows off your system

>       For me to switch to Linux would mean overcoming
>a learning curve (and a steep one at that).  I want to
>know is it worth the cost in time, for me to invest in
>learning all these new commands.

as i said above, with kde or gbome the learning curve shuld be gentler

hs

------------------------------

From: gpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mandrake 7.1 - partition 85 plz help
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:17:39 GMT

i had a hd in 3 partitions: 1 win98, 1 data, and 1 win2k and also 3 giga

free space for linux. after i had install mandrake in the free space and

i reboot in windows98
i found that the  partition with my data had gone.
i opened partition magic and it shows me that i have a win98 part, a
win2k,kai ena type 85 (extended linux)!
With liux i can see my data partition and mount it normally , but i want

to have access to my data and from win.
how can i split the partitions as it was before?
Please answer me as soon as possible,
Thanks in advance
P.S I know .. my english suck .. sorry :)


------------------------------

From: Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux on Laptop
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:22:36 -0000

  "Henry Kruuskopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  In a message on Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:39:32 +0200, wrote :

"K> Hi! I try to install redhat6.2 to my old 486DX4 / 50Mhz 16MB ram
"K> laptop. It's AST Ascentia 900N.
"K> My problem is that my IBM Ethernet creditcard PCMCIA adapter seems not to
"K> work. I fact redhat install with PCMCIA support don't even regonize this
"K> adapter.
"K> It's real pain to run windows95 on this machine. I don't want to buy OS2
"K> Warp or any other 'slicer&faster' OS to this machine.
"K> So if anyone has similar experienses with success reply thank you wery much.

I installed older versions of RedHat Linux (before RedHat's installer
properly supported PCMCIA/network installations).  This is what I did:

I got a copy of Slackware (3.4 I think) and did a *floppy* install of
the A (base) and N (network) sets.  I partitioned the drive into four
partitions (I have a 500meg drive):

/dev/hda1 / (root) 64meg
/dev/hda2  swap   64meg
/dev/hda3 /usr     256meg
/dev/hda4 /home    rest of disk 

After the minimual slackware install, I got my PCMCIA ethernet card
working and used ftp under Slackware to copy a minimual RPM set (and
related support stuff) to the /home fs.  Then did a RedHat install from
hard drive (re-formating the root and /usr file systems).  I initially
installed RH 4.2 and latter upgraded to RH 5.2.

"K> 
"K> -Wmute
"K> 
"K> 
"K>                           






                                  
-- 
                                     \/
Robert Heller                        ||InterNet:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller  ||            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deepsoft.com              /\FidoNet:    1:321/153

------------------------------

From: Terry Gliedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TCSH core dump
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 08:33:57 -0400

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I'm suddenly getting core dumps whenever TCSH starts up and therefore
> no
> users can log in.  Root logins are fine, as SH is OK.  BASH is OK, so
> that is now the default shell.
> 
> I've tried replacing the TCSH binary, but that does not solve the
> problem, so I assume TCSH is calling some other program that is
> corrupted.  Unfortunately, I'm clueless on how to track down the file
> that is actually causing the problem.  Is there a clue in the core dump
> itself?  Is there a utility that allows me to "browse" the core dump
> file?  Is there a list that identifies all programs called by TCSH?
> The
> man page lists a lot of files in the "SEE ALSO" section, but none of
> the
> obvious programs seem to have a problem.

So, let me get this correct. TCSH was working at some point and then it
started to fail?

The fact that root can login and bash works suggests your system
basically there. It's only tcsh, so that means it's either

(1) there's a serious bug in the shell itself. This seems pretty
unlikely, given all the other people using tcsh.

(2) an environment issue. I don't believe any shell REQUIRES any other
file. The shells all check for an admin defined rc file and for user rc
file to be executed (sourced). If these do no exist, it will just
continue.

So I'll guess this is a badly trashed rc file somewhere.

I presume the first thing you did was to rename the .*cshrc files in
$HOME so these were not sourced. If not, do this. If it fails you know
where to look.

There's a similar system wide file (/etc/skel??  any other places??  try
'man tcsh' and see what other files it references). Rename these files
one at a time and see if the problem changes.

That's all I can think of. Good luck.

-- 
================================================================
Terry Gliedt     [EMAIL PROTECTED]         http://www.hps.com/~tpg/
Biostatistics, Univ of Michigan    Personal Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Mandrake 7 User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to enable ftpd
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:51:43 GMT

 how do i set up an ftp server?  is there any (readable) docu on the
web?  searched for hours w/o finding anything useful.

--

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: John Lodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail API for Linux
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:49:28 +0100 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,

Is there a c API for Linux, equvivalent to MAPI, that I can use to send
mail direct to a POP3 server from
a program.

Any help or example code would be greatly appreciated.

J


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba and windoze 98
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:05:03 GMT

The following is my smb.conf file.  I have run through the tests on
the samba page.  I believe that eveything is correct on my linux box
and that there is something wrong on the windoze side.  

If there is something wrong here, could someone please point it out.

Also if there is any information about setting up the windoze side,
that would be appreciated.

# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from drc3225 (192.168.0.1)
# Date: 2000/10/03 07:56:30

# Global parameters
[global]
        workgroup = DBX
        path = /video
        hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127.

[john]
        comment = Home Directories
        read only = No
        create mask = 0770
        guest ok = Yes
============================================================
hosts.allow 
ALL: ALL

hosts
127.0.0.1       local host
192.168.0.2     linux    linux.the.computer
192.168.0.1     drc3224  drc3224.the.computer
===========================================================================
WINDOZE information
I specify an ip address of 192.168.0.1
for the NIC that is connected to the linux box.

Thank you 

John Miller


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Mail API for Linux
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:17:12 GMT

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:49:28 +0100 , John Lodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Is there a c API for Linux, equvivalent to MAPI, that I can use to send
>mail direct to a POP3 server from
>a program.

Yes and no.

There is no 'equivalent to MAPI' (at least not as far as I know).
However, POP3 is an established protocol, and it is not difficult to
either:
a) converse with the POP3 server directly (a well-known API), or
b) fork/exec a well-known mail program to feed the POP3 server with
   your selected data.

Of the two, the first option is the closest to 'an equivalent to
MAPI', and is (in general terms) how most of the 'equivalent to some
MS-specific API' are implemented. (Let's rephrase that: MAPI is how
Microsoft performs their equivalent to the sockets/POP3 protocol
conversation.)

If you really don't want to give up MAPI, then you are welcome to
write a set of shell functions that encapsulate the POP3 conversation
in a MAPI interface. IMHO, this would be an exercise in self-delusion,
but might be worthwhile in that it would help ex-MS developers to port
applications to Unix.

>Any help or example code would be greatly appreciated.
>
>J
>


Lew Pitcher
Information Technology Consultant
Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group

([EMAIL PROTECTED])


(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)

------------------------------

From: David Lia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: searching for cpu performance over a network * * * *
Date: 03 Oct 2000 14:52:53 +0200


Hi all,

I'm looking for a program that measures the system performance of

a host over a network, i'm especially interested in the cpu performance,

something like xosview but now over a network

I'using KDE & Linux 2.2.13 (SuSE)

any idea's

thx in advance

__________________________________________________________
LIA David                  email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alcatel Bell Space N.V.                                        
Berkenrodelei 33,          phone : +32 (0)3 829 5658               
B-2660 Hoboken, Belgium.   fax   : +32 (0)3 829 5763               

 
-- 

------------------------------

From: Patrick M Geahan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and windoze 98
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:23:12 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following is my smb.conf file.  I have run through the tests on
> the samba page.  I believe that eveything is correct on my linux box
> and that there is something wrong on the windoze side.  

That is possible.  However, without more information as to precisely what
the problem is, it will be very difficult to assist you in diagnosing it.

> If there is something wrong here, could someone please point it out.

Everything in your smb.conf looks OK, but I can't guarantee that.  Have
you checked the smb.conf manpage to ensure that your options are being
used properly?


-- 
=======Patrick M [EMAIL PROTECTED]=======ICQ:3784715======
Quote of the Week: "Compared to the Black Plague European Tour, nothing of
note has happened in Europe since the Germans got uppity a couple of times
earlier this century." - Natural Born Cereal Killer in alt.peeves

------------------------------

From: Jacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AMD Duron & Kernel Panic
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:27:10 +1000


==============2B43B9526B2D458CF94E06D1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Block Iron & Supply Co - CIS wrote:

> I have system with a AMD Duron, FIC AZ 11 motherboard, TNT2 video, 128mb
> PC133 ram, and 7.5gb hd. I have no problems installing Red Hat 6.1 & 6.2.
> When I reboot the kernel panics every time when it is turning off the CPUID.
> Any ideas how to work around this or is this motherboard problem?

Try this, works for me.
Jacek.


> Subject: Re: Athlon workaround
> Date: 6 Sep 2000 11:23:38 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Irger Armin)
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: IAE newsgate
> Newsgroups: linux.redhat.install
> Followup-To: poster
>
> Roberto Pavan wrote:
>
> > Could somebody please re-post the kernel parameter to pass at boot to
> > ignore the 'turn off the intel cpuid function'?
>
> Hi,
> take a look at:
>
>  http://www.epox.com/html/english/support/motherboard/Get.asp?Article=1271
>
> ISSUE REPORTED BY CLIENT
>
>                   I tried installing [Redhat 6.2] but after the reboot
> it gives me a General Protection Fault or Kernel Panic trying to
>                   disable the CPUID. Any ideas please!?
>
>              POSSIBLE SOLUTION
>
>                   This issue appears to be related to a Processor Serial
> Number function supported by Redhat that the Duron does
>                   not. There are two possible resolutions depending upon
> the status of your installation.
>
>                   1. When first installing Redhat 6.2 (or 6.1) you will
> be asked at some stage if you require any special parameters
>                   for the kernel. At this point enter:
>                   x86_serial_nr=1
>
>                   Once installed, this parameter is already in the
> kernel and there is no need to do more.
>
>                   2. If Redhat was already installed type at the lilo
> prompt:
>                   linux x86_serial_nr=1
>
>                   Once you boot, recompile the kernel with the: "Disable
> Serial Number at boot" left clear.
>
>              ADDITIONAL NOTES
>
>                   EPoX thanks Alexandros Kambas and Thomas Leibold for
> determining the solution to this issue.
>
> cu armin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
>

==============2B43B9526B2D458CF94E06D1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
&nbsp;
<p>Block Iron &amp; Supply Co - CIS wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I have system with a AMD Duron, FIC AZ 11 motherboard,
TNT2 video, 128mb
<br>PC133 ram, and 7.5gb hd. I have no problems installing Red Hat 6.1
&amp; 6.2.
<br>When I reboot the kernel panics every time when it is turning off the
CPUID.
<br>Any ideas how to work around this or is this motherboard problem?</blockquote>
Try this, works for me.
<br>Jacek.
<br>&nbsp;
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<pre>Subject: Re: Athlon workaround
Date: 6 Sep 2000 11:23:38 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Irger Armin)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: IAE newsgate
Newsgroups: linux.redhat.install
Followup-To: poster

Roberto Pavan wrote:

> Could somebody please re-post the kernel parameter to pass at boot to
> ignore the 'turn off the intel cpuid function'?

Hi,
take a look at:

&nbsp;<A 
HREF="http://www.epox.com/html/english/support/motherboard/Get.asp?Article=1271">http://www.epox.com/html/english/support/motherboard/Get.asp?Article=1271</A>

ISSUE REPORTED BY CLIENT

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 I tried installing [Redhat 6.2] but after the reboot
it gives me a General Protection Fault or Kernel Panic trying to
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 disable the CPUID. Any ideas please!?

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; POSSIBLE 
SOLUTION

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 This issue appears to be related to a Processor Serial
Number function supported by Redhat that the Duron does
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 not. There are two possible resolutions depending upon
the status of your installation.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 1. When first installing Redhat 6.2 (or 6.1) you will
be asked at some stage if you require any special parameters
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 for the kernel. At this point enter:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 x86_serial_nr=1

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 Once installed, this parameter is already in the
kernel and there is no need to do more.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 2. If Redhat was already installed type at the lilo
prompt:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 linux x86_serial_nr=1

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 Once you boot, recompile the kernel with the: "Disable
Serial Number at boot" left clear.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ADDITIONAL 
NOTES

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 EPoX thanks Alexandros Kambas and Thomas Leibold for
determining the solution to this issue.

cu armin

_______________________________________________
Redhat-install-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<A 
HREF="https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list">https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list</A></pre>
</blockquote>
</html>

==============2B43B9526B2D458CF94E06D1==


------------------------------

From: Dave Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Recording audio output to disk?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:40:46 -0400

William McBrine wrote:
 
> I want to make a direct digital copy of the audio output, similar to what
> Total Recorder does in Windows. Any pointers?

        http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/linuxsound/players.html

HTH...

------------------------------

From: Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel version in Slackware circa 1995 and RedHat 4.x
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:31:02 GMT

Can someone remember off the top of their head what kernel version
shipped with Slackware back in late 1995? And also in RedHat 4.x?

I'm trying to get some versions of libraries, etc. from both distros for
my own knowledge.

Or, if someone can locate a detailed history of each distro, I would
like to know the URL.

Thanks,
Bruce


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Beggar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: Not allow mount file system
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 21:41:56 +0800

The Linux box is our product and we have develop some software inside.
I need to sell the product, but don't want the buyer can steal the program
inside. So the password in BIOS is not practical because the buyer need
to startup the machine.

Thanks for your reply!!

Dicky

The Darkener wrote:

> Besides using encrypted filesystems (probably your best bet), if you've
> got someone that has physical access to your hardware, there really
> isn't anything you can do.  They can just as well steal your hard drive,
> bring it to a cleanroom and read the data bit-by-bit onto another
> drive.  Your best bet is to:
>
> 1) Use a good bios password
> 2) Put a lock on your physical computer case
> 3) Enforce good physical security around the box (is this at home, or in
> a work enviornment?)
>
> Beggar wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is there any way to not allow the linux partition cannot mount
> > by other OS (include linux) except the machine install on it.
> >
> > I want to protect my files not being steal by others even he can
> > physically access the hardware. Any idea?
> >
> > I have heard about "kerneli.org" , but it seems not applicable for
> > me.
> >
> > Dicky
>
> --
> - The Darkener
> It is pitch black.  You are likely to be eaten by a grue.


------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Wierd Lilo problem
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 13:47:40 GMT

John in SD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> ReiserFS  *must*  be mounted 'notail' when lilo is installed:  specifically,
> /boot/boot.b and any message file; and when /sbin/lilo is run -- since this is
> when the /boot/map file is created.


   Thanks. Seems to have fixed everything. Now to try and boot windows.
   
   Nick

-- 
=============================
Anybody got plans for an ark?
=============================

------------------------------

From: Beggar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Disable booting message?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 21:43:59 +0800

Hi all,

How to disable the booting message during system startup?

Dicky


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to