Linux-Misc Digest #993, Volume #26 Thu, 1 Feb 01 16:13:02 EST
Contents:
Video Conference ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: how to upgrade rpm (Steve Ackman)
Re: how to upgrade rpm ("Howard")
Re: Better wait for Linux Kernel 2.4.x (Lack Mr G M)
reading SunOS formatted Zip under Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Multibooting 5 OSs => Win98, NT4, Linux, Solaris 8 and Unixware 7 - HOW TO???
(Gopala)
Re: How to access windows partitions from linux? ("Chris Divine")
crc error - system halted ("Chris Divine")
Re: what does this kernel message mean? ("Arthur H. Gold")
Re: why can't i find any good GUI file managers? ("Chris Divine")
Re: how to upgrade rpm (Rick)
Re: reading SunOS formatted Zip under Linux (Alex Yung)
linux boot problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
linux boot problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Netscape 6 - Memory Usage !! (Dan Smith)
Re: Netscape 6 - Memory Usage !! (Dan Smith)
Re: JSP/Servlet implementation of Webmail? ("Lockett Family")
Re: PCI bus access ("Ken Whaley")
Re: what does this kernel message mean? (pb)
wordperfect time (Kevin Paul)
Re: linux boot problem (Jean-David Beyer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Video Conference
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:58:39 GMT
Is there any video conference tool for linux?
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Ackman)
Subject: Re: how to upgrade rpm
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:41:29 -0500
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 08:02:59 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Steve Ackman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:41:54 -0500, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >I have rpm-3.0.3-43mdk from mandrake 7.0 I often get an error saying I
>> >cant istall a package with version >= 3. How can I upgrade or change my
>> >rpm package so I can install these packages?
>> >
>> >Any and all help appreciated.
>>
>> Red Hat has an updated rpm version on it's errata page
>> where you can download rpm-3.0.5-9.6x.i386.rpm.
>>
>Once you have rpm-3.0.5-9.6x.i386.rpm installed and running on your
>machine, what is the next one you should get to upgrade to the current
>rpm? I tried installing rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm and it failed because of an
>awful lot of dependency problems. It wanted
>glibc >= 2.1.92 (I have glibc-2.1.3-15.4), db1 = 1.85 (not installed),
>libbz2.s0.1 (I have /usr/lib/libbz2.so.0 from bzip2-0.9.5d-2),
>libdb-3.1.so (I have /lib/libdb-2.1.3.so from glibc-2.1.3-15.4),
>libc.so.6 (I HAVE /lib/libc.so.6), rpm = 3.04 (needed by
>rpm-build-3.04-048.4: what are they talking about? I have:
>valinux:jdbeyer[~]$ rpm -qa | grep rpm
>rpm-build-3.0.5-9.6x
>rpm-devel-3.0.5-9.6x
>rpm-3.0.5-9.6x
>rpm-python-3.0.5-9.6x ), rpm-build-3.0.5 (I have -9.6x version),
>rpm-devel-3.0.5 (I have -9.6x version).
>
>I could not find a glibc 2.1.92 and hesitate to go up to the 2.2 series.
>I could not find a plain rpm 3.0.5 version, and fear it would be a
>downgrade from 3.0.5-9.6x, and so on.
>
>So I decided to give up on it.
I have yet to find anything that I actually need rpm-4.x for.
That's obviously been built to require all the things that
come with Red Hat 7.0. You could try the --nodeps switch and
see if those things are *really* required, but as long as
the rpm-3.0.5-9.6x upgrade works, why bother?
--
Steve Ackman
http://twovoyagers.com
Registered Linux User #79430
1:39pm up 20 days, 16:55, 16 users, load average: 0.97, 1.01, 0.65
------------------------------
From: "Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: how to upgrade rpm
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:26:56 +0000
> Thanks; but will this introduce any incompatibilites with my old rpms?
>
> --
> Louis-ljl-{ Louis J. LaBash, Jr. }
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Ive just updated to RPM 4 and it trashed the database! or it cannot read
it.Now when I try to install I get lists of dependecies of files I know
I've installed.As far as I know RPM4 is backward compat.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lack Mr G M)
Subject: Re: Better wait for Linux Kernel 2.4.x
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:07:43 GMT
In article <zmMd6.503$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arctic Storm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>
|> Anyone else tired of reading about complaints about Linux Kernel 2.4?!
Not read that many. I've had no problem. Went to 2.4.1 last night.
But then I ran virtually all of the 2.3.xx series and only one of
them gave me a real problem (fixed next day...) and the 2.4-testnn ones
too.
I have remembered to read about which utilities need to be updated
(although that doesn't mean I've always done it - just not complained if
something didn't work quite right).
--
========= Gordon Lack =============== [EMAIL PROTECTED] ============
This message *may* reflect my personal opinion. It is *not* intended
to reflect those of my employer, or anyone else.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: reading SunOS formatted Zip under Linux
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:35:35 GMT
I have some old Zip100 disks that were created under zip drive
connected to Sun running SunOS. I can't mount them under Linux...I
get "wrong fs type" error. Is there any way around this?
-Rick
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Gopala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,comp.unix.solaris,alt.solaris.x86
Subject: Re: Multibooting 5 OSs => Win98, NT4, Linux, Solaris 8 and Unixware 7 - HOW
TO???
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:44:00 GMT
I fully agree with Rod Smith's treatment of MS operating systems. But
be careful, unlike LINUX which is very adept in handling the MS
paritions and large disks, SOLARIS is not flexible. I totally lost
touch with Unixware, but Solaris 8, did give me a hickup on my 2xIDE
2xNT4, 3xWin2k, 1xWin98, 1xWinlinux, 1xSUSE Linux box. All this was
possible due to LILO of SUSE linux. I have lost my entired 2nd IDE disk
paritions, when I tried to install SOLARIS. So please be careful.
HTH
Gopi
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "Chris Divine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to access windows partitions from linux?
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:51:00 -0800
"Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:95c7g0$gfs$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I installed linux (redhat 7) with everything on a system that dual boots
> > to windows (can't give it up just yet.) I need to pull data off of the
> > windows partition from linux but haven't a clue on how this is done.
>
> Can't believe no one has answered this rather simple question yet...
> A caveat, though: it depends on exactly what flavor of Windows you're
using.
> It's a bit different for 3.1/95/98 and NT (and probably different still
for
> 2000). So, assuming you have 95...
>
> Firstly, figure out where your Windows partition(s) is/are. Usually
> the first partition of the first disk, since that's what Windows insists
on!
> So, try this: mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt
> You will have to be root to do that. You should see the contents of your
> Windows partition appear under /mnt. However, you probably want long
> filenames, so try type "vfat" instead of msdos. You probably also don't
> want to have to go through all that every time, so add a line like
> /dev/hda1 /windows vfat noauto 0 0
> to your /etc/fstab. Check the mount and fstab man pages for details.
>
> If you're using NT, your partitions are probably of type NTFS, in
> which case you need NTFS support in your kernel (or a module for it).
> Things are pretty much as above, except that you'd use type NTFS, and your
> partitions will be mounted read-only.
Another caution is to make sure you know which partitions to mount. I
created directories under /mnt called /mnt/win98 and /mnt/win2k then tried
to mount my two windows partitions by saying "mount -t vfat /dev/hda1
/mnt/win98" and "mount -t vfat /dev/hda2 /mnt/win2k". The first one was
successful, the second one wasn't. It turns out that the second partition on
my primary IDE drive is actually seen by Linux as /dev/hda5. So after I
mounted the second partition as "mount -t vfat /dev/hda5 /mnt/win2k" it
worked and now I can see all the files on both of my windows partitions.
------------------------------
From: "Chris Divine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crc error - system halted
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:56:00 -0800
I am frequently running into the error that says:
Uncompressing Linux...
crc error
-- system halted
I have gotten several explanations from people as to what may be causing
this, from bad RAM to a bad hard disk to bad bus speed on the mobo to . . .
.
Anyone care to throw in your explanation and how you tracked down the
problem? For what it's worth, it may take me 8 or 9 reboots before I get
past this error and the system boots the kernel correctly. Is there a way to
make an uncompressed kernel so that the system doesn't have to uncompress it
on the fly during boot up?
I have seen this on both my 2.2.x kernel and my 2.4.x kernel.
--
'First they tell you you're wrong and they can prove it;
then they tell you you're right but it isn't important;
then they tell you it's important but they knew it all along.'
---
Chris
"I don't speak for Intel and they don't speak for me"
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:11:06 -0600
From: "Arthur H. Gold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: what does this kernel message mean?
arif wrote:
>
> I was looking through my logs on a newly installed suse 7.0 system, and
> saw this message: I've got no idea what it is though... can anyone help?
> Jan 31 00:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 00:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 01:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 01:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 01:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 02:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 02:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 02:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 03:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 03:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 03:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 04:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 04:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 04:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 05:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 05:27:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 05:47:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 06:07:31 linux -- MARK --
> Jan 31 06:27:31 linux -- MARK --
>
> -arif
It's just letting you know that despite the fact syslog has
had nothing to report, it's still operating (notice the
twenty minute intervals).
HTH,
--ag
--
Artie Gold, Austin, TX (finger the cs.utexas.edu account
for more info)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
A: Yes I would. But not enough to put it out.
------------------------------
From: "Chris Divine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: why can't i find any good GUI file managers?
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:08:49 -0800
"Gregory Spath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I realize I am jumping in late here, but take a look at rox:
> http://rox.sourceforge.net/
>
> Very light, fast, elegant filemanager.
>
> To date I've used gmc, kfm, konqueror, dfm...and rox is the best (but
lacking
> some of the nice features in kfm and dfm still).
Also, check out Eazel
http://www.eazel.com/software
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: how to upgrade rpm
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:14:28 GMT
Thanks, I will give it a try.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Philippe Possemiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get rpm 3.0.5(-7), it can handle rpms >= 3.
> You can get it from ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-3.0.x/
>
> Philippe
>
> -ljl- wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have rpm-3.0.3-43mdk from mandrake 7.0 I often get an error
saying I
> > > cant istall a package with version >= 3. How can I upgrade or
change
> > my
> > > rpm package so I can install these packages?
> > >
> > > Any and all help appreciated.
> >
> > Welcome to RPM hell; they have done it _again_.
> >
> > --
> > Louis-ljl-{ Louis J. LaBash, Jr. }
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com
> > http://www.deja.com/
>
>
--
Rick
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Yung)
Subject: Re: reading SunOS formatted Zip under Linux
Date: 1 Feb 2001 20:11:07 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you specify the fstype in your mount command?
mount -t ufs /dev/partition /mountPoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have some old Zip100 disks that were created under zip drive
: connected to Sun running SunOS. I can't mount them under Linux...I
: get "wrong fs type" error. Is there any way around this?
: -Rick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: linux boot problem
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:22:15 GMT
I have a dual boot system running both Win 98se and Redhat 7. A windows
virus overwrote my MBR (which contained lilo) and now I can't boot. I
got in from a linux boot disk and tryed to mount the root partition
however it does not seem to exist. I used the default redhat setup and
never really payed attention to what partitions it setup. When now I
list the partitions with fdisk I get:
/dev/hda1 windows 4Gb
/dev/hda2 linux swap 128Mb
/dev/hda3 linux (/boot) 1.2Gb
I can mount /dev/hda3 and read the boot directory of my system however I
cannot get to my root directory. I assume it is in /dev/hda3 somewhere
because that partition is so big. Any help as to how I can boot and/or
read my root directory would be very appreciated.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux boot problem
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:22:47 GMT
I have a dual boot system running both Win 98se and Redhat 7. A windows
virus overwrote my MBR (which contained lilo) and now I can't boot. I
got in from a linux boot disk and tryed to mount the root partition
however it does not seem to exist. I used the default redhat setup and
never really payed attention to what partitions it setup. When now I
list the partitions with fdisk I get:
/dev/hda1 windows 4Gb
/dev/hda2 linux swap 128Mb
/dev/hda3 linux (/boot) 1.2Gb
I can mount /dev/hda3 and read the boot directory of my system however I
cannot get to my root directory. I assume it is in /dev/hda3 somewhere
because that partition is so big. Any help as to how I can boot and/or
read my root directory would be very appreciated.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Dan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape 6 - Memory Usage !!
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:57:45 -0500
Well, I considered that maybe that is a problem... I do not have it
enabled right now, but I don't need it, on a normal basis. Should I
enable it? Is there some function of Mozilla that assumes this will be
enabled?
I'll go try it... Thanks!
In article <95c9a7$282$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I know this would sound stupid since you have 512MB of memory, but is
> it possible that swapping is not enabled?
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have downloaded and installed Netscape 6 on my LM 7.1 system. When
> I
> > run it, my memory usage goes nuts. The "java_vm" process group takes
> > 266MB and the "mozilla_bin" set take 130MB. What's the deal? I've
> got
> > 512MB of ram, but that puts a major dent in my system (I have 512MB
> for
> > other things, not just Netscape, so it is something I need to
> resolve).
> >
> > Does anyone know about this?
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > --Dan
> >
>
> --
>
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
------------------------------
From: Dan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape 6 - Memory Usage !!
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 10:08:51 -0500
Ok, I setup and enabled 128MB of swap space on a decently-fast SCSI
drive. /proc/meminfo shows 128MB of swap, 0 used. Swapon -s shows
correct info. I have been doing some stuff, and I see no difference.
Mozilla takes just as much, and the system won't dip into the swap.
How is it that everyone else seems to only use 25-30MB? Am I doing
something wrong on the install or something?
--Dan
Noname wrote:
> I know this would sound stupid since you have 512MB of memory, but is
> it possible that swapping is not enabled?
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have downloaded and installed Netscape 6 on my LM 7.1 system. When
>
> I
>
>> run it, my memory usage goes nuts. The "java_vm" process group takes
>> 266MB and the "mozilla_bin" set take 130MB. What's the deal? I've
>
> got
>
>> 512MB of ram, but that puts a major dent in my system (I have 512MB
>
> for
>
>> other things, not just Netscape, so it is something I need to
>
> resolve).
>
>> Does anyone know about this?
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>> --Dan
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "Lockett Family" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: JSP/Servlet implementation of Webmail?
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:35:47 GMT
check out Sake mail at http://www.endymion.com/
"Henrik Sjostrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:95c8rj$1np$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows of any webmail (http mail) solution that's implemented as
> Servlets/JSP's? I'm setting up a Linux box with web and mail servers
> and would like a webmail interface to my mail boxes.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Henrik Sjostrand
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "Ken Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: PCI bus access
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:45:15 -0800
If you want a quick & dirty "map me my device" then just
do an mmap call on /dev/mem giving the physical range
that you want to map (you can find your device via "cat /proc/pci")
and using the returned virtual address as the base of your device's
memory range. This is a hack, but you asked for "the simplest way"
and that's what this is.
Note that the usual permissions on /dev/mem prevent all but root from
creating writeable maps on /dev/mem).
x86 note: This is assuming that you're in fact talking about a PCI
device's *memory* range, not an i/o port range.
x86 note: If you want any sort of decent write performance
(above about 30MB/sec) to PCI device memory space on PII's or
later then you'll have to write a kernel module and mark the appropriate
portions of your device's address space as USWC via the mtrr_add() function.
Beware: make sure you understand USWC before doing this, because memory
transactions to USWC memory are "weakly" ordered.
General Note: make sure you understand the memory ordering rules of your
host platform, this is especially crucial when accessing PCI device
addresses
that have side effects. Usual problems are: multiple writes to the same
address could be squashed by the processor, or writes can arrive at the
device in a different order than the order they were issued by the program.
Ken
"bjrosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:955ggk$7fa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is there anyway to do this without a driver? I'm trying to do the same
> thing for a hardware development diagnostic and I haven't been able to
> figure out which #includes and #defines are required to make ioremap
> work. I'm looking for the simplest way to get at PCI memory space.
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Arne Driescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David Florez wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Does anybody know if there is a way of mapping
> > > the physical PCI bus addresses into user memory
> > > space (being user root if needed)?
> > >
> > > I need to write an application that will be
> > > accessing the PCI bus VERY often. The only thing
> > > I can think of is adding a module to the kernel
> > > (device driver) that maps the PCI bus to kernel
> > > linear space ( by calling ioremap() ) and
> > > therefore the user app would have to issue a
> > > system call to request a PCI bus data transaction
> > > to the device driver. The idea would be finding a
> > > way of getting rid of these overkilling system
> > > calls.
> > The trick is called mmap. This means you have to write
> > a device driver (module) that implements the mmap system call.
> > Basically it works like:
> > 1) The user uses address=mmap(FileHandle,some parameter ..) to
> > get an address where the mem is mapped.
> > 2) The request is routed to your driver and used to setup
> > some memory mapping.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > Arne
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: pb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: what does this kernel message mean?
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:56:13 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
arif in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I was looking through my logs on a newly installed suse 7.0 system, and
>saw this message: I've got no idea what it is though... can anyone help?
>Jan 31 00:27:31 linux -- MARK --
>Jan 31 00:47:31 linux -- MARK --
>Jan 31 01:07:31 linux -- MARK --
>Jan 31 01:27:31 linux -- MARK --
>Jan 31 01:47:31 linux -- MARK --
Look at the times. It's just a message that says 20 minutes has
passed, and all is well. No big deal, just ignore it.
It can be modified for different time periods, but I can't remember
how.
--
pb
------------------------------
From: Kevin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wordperfect time
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:59:34 GMT
When using Wordperfect 8, 'insert time' command uses GMT rather than the
MST (+7) that my system uses. How the heck can I change this? TIA
--
Kevin Paul
------------------------------
From: Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux boot problem
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 16:05:29 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have a dual boot system running both Win 98se and Redhat 7. A windows
> virus overwrote my MBR (which contained lilo) and now I can't boot. I
> got in from a linux boot disk and tryed to mount the root partition
> however it does not seem to exist. I used the default redhat setup and
> never really payed attention to what partitions it setup. When now I
> list the partitions with fdisk I get:
>
> /dev/hda1 windows 4Gb
> /dev/hda2 linux swap 128Mb
> /dev/hda3 linux (/boot) 1.2Gb
>
> I can mount /dev/hda3 and read the boot directory of my system however I
> cannot get to my root directory. I assume it is in /dev/hda3 somewhere
> because that partition is so big. Any help as to how I can boot and/or
> read my root directory would be very appreciated.
>
One thing you might do is move your /boot before your swap.
But your list is curious. There is no point making the /boot partition
larger than 24 megabytes, and some people can do with even less than
that. You really do need a root file system (/), and I do not see it on
your list.
I have two hard drives and no windows on my machine. My fstab looks like
this:
Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1116 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 3 24066 83 Linux /boot
/dev/sda2 4 20 136552+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda3 21 275 2048287+ 83 Linux /data1
/dev/sda4 276 1116 6755332+ 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 276 403 1028128+ 83 Linux /opt
/dev/sda6 404 420 136521 83 Linux /tmp
/dev/sda7 421 452 257008+ 83 Linux /var
/dev/sda8 453 1116 5333548+ 83 Linux /
Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1116 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 3 24066 83 Linux /boot2
/dev/sdb2 4 20 136552+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/sdb3 21 275 2048287+ 83 Linux /data2
/dev/sdb4 276 1116 6755332+ 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 276 1116 6755301 83 Linux /home
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
^^-^^ 3:55pm up 4 days, 24 min, 3 users, load average: 2.15, 2.12, 2.09
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
