Linux-Misc Digest #7, Volume #27 Sat, 3 Feb 01 07:13:01 EST
Contents:
Taichung Taiwan Linux user group meeting 2001 FEB 10 (Dan Jacobson)
Re: secure access to company email server (Floyd Davidson)
Re: emulate linux under a windows server? (Michael Heiming)
Re: emulate linux under a windows server? (Aitch)
Re: ALD - Assembly Language Debugger - where? ("Tauno Voipio")
tar files
Re: Backup remotely ? (Wong Sai-kee)
Re: Errors In Partition Table ("Werner Fangmeier")
Re: 2nd par port board ("John G. Sandell")
Re: Red Hat 7 (Markku Kolkka)
Re: Moving boot (Mike Mcclain)
Re: tar files (Isaac Venn)
Re: removing partition with data in it (John Thompson)
Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else) (Walt, Southern California,
USA)
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Walt, Southern California, USA)
zombie process ("Xavier Houppertz")
RAM advice ("Xavier Houppertz")
Modem [linmodem] configuration ("Panagiotis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Taichung Taiwan Linux user group meeting 2001 FEB 10
Date: 02 Feb 2001 11:05:59 +0800
Taichung Taiwan Linux user group meeting 2001 FEB 10 Sat. 1-5 PM
at Formosa College, 5F 161 Shifu Rd. Taichung TEL 04 22269228
[see NNTP server xcin.linux.org.tw tlug.tclug group, news:tw.bbs.comp.linux]
--
http://www.geocities.com/jidanni Tel886-4-25854780 e-mail:restore .com. �n����
------------------------------
From: Floyd Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: secure access to company email server
Date: 02 Feb 2001 22:27:23 -0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt) wrote:
>On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:47:15 GMT, Danny Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Hi, all.
>>
>>My company has setup a mail server on Linux server with qmail. Usually
>>we can access its POP service in company via the intranet. But it also
>>denies all access from outside company for security purpose. So I
>>cannot get mail at home. What is the solution for such kind of problem?
>>Thanks.
>
>Set up a dialin box at work if possible. I can do whatever I want to at
>our office, which is connected to a WAN by frame relay (factory, other
>offices).
That is an *extremely* risky thing to suggest, given what has
been stated. It was specifically noted that outside access has
been intentionally restricted for security reasons. Individuals
who make efforts to get around such security precautions 1) put
the company at risk, and 2) put thier employment on the line.
Typically companies terminate employees who are that casual
about company security. At worst they have been known to file
criminal charges and seek jail sentences when possible.
Proceed with extreme caution and be absolutely positive you
have the authority to implement whatever solution you select.
>Initially I set up NAT32 (www.nat32.com) on a Win95 box as a
>dialin server, but slightly different than they recommend. I
>used a different ethernet IP for NAT32 than Win was using, so I
>was still able to use my box on the network during any dialin
>call.
>
>Then I set up an old 386 box w/RH 5 as a dialin server using
>mgetty.
>
>Then during some network problems with our frame relay, I
>started reading the docs for our Cisco router and discovered I
>could hang up to 8 modems on it using ppp with pap
>authentication. This is the only internet access my boss has
>from home at this time.
>
>Our factory now has imail (Ipswitch) web based e-mail which I
>can send from, but it goes out with our company domain and I
>have not figured out how to access received company e-mail
>there unless I specifically address to imail's hostname. If I
>wanted to use it I could put a forward file on our
>smtp/pop3/squid server, but fetchmail works from the internet
>with our POP3 server.
Allowing outside access to company computers and networks is
risky at best, and requires very knowledgable administration at
a minimum. Perhaps your company has no vital information on
their computers, or perhaps you do have the expertize required.
But the OP did not indicate any such thing, and inferred exactly
the opposite.
I have a suggestion. Keep company email and home email totally
separate. If outside access is required, have a separate
network for it, with no connection to computers that have
sensitive company private data.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.ptialaska.net/~floyd>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:18:22 +0100
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: emulate linux under a windows server?
jontee wrote:
> I know most people do it the other way round but I am stuck with the windows
> server but would really like to have a small linux distro running in a
> window
> any ideas?
> thanks in advance
> jontee
Hello,
you could use VM-Ware or run cygwin, login to a linux machine using
reflection-X or some kind of ssh client for M$...depending
on your needs, as you don't write what you want to do...?
Sure if someone does this he uses it the other way running M$ within Linux
(VM-Ware), I've been told it's much more stable
this way...
Good luck
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
From: Aitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: emulate linux under a windows server?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:15:35 GMT
jontee Wrote:
> I know most people do it the other way round but I am stuck with the
> windows server but would really like to have a small linux distro running
> in a window
> any ideas?
> thanks in advance
> jontee
>
>
www.vmware.com.
Vmware is great. Not exactly a performer though...
--
Registered User #204093
Linux 2.4.1 i586
3:09am up 7:26, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.08, 0.07
------------------------------
From: "Tauno Voipio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ALD - Assembly Language Debugger - where?
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:28:40 GMT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:95fop3$4pv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks, will try that too. It is only a debugger with
> GUI, not a disassembler though.
> -dan
At least my GDB can disassemble. See GDB manual for disasm.
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio @ iki fi
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tar files
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:30:15 -0000
I have a game that has been downloaded as a .tar file. How do you expand
it if your o/s is win95? Regards GF
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Wong Sai-kee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Backup remotely ?
Date: 3 Feb 2001 09:39:27 GMT
-ljl- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: The exclusion of backing up the "/dev" directory is very
: common. If necessary it can be rebuilt using "/dev/MAKEDEV",
If backup the /dev do no harm, then I would prefer to do is with /dev
At least I could save the step of /dev/MAKEDEV during restore. Thanks.
: Remember "/dev/st0" is your tape's yo-yo mode, "/dev/nst0" is the
: non-rewinding device (tape).
The device name in my installation is /dev/rst0, and the rescue floppy
is /dev/st0. May be rst0 means rewind. BTW, when will one use nst0 ?
SK
------------------------------
From: "Werner Fangmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Subject: Re: Errors In Partition Table
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 10:52:55 +0100
Again, many thx for the info; the reason for all this writing is Partition
Magic refusing the create or resize partitions, as long as this "overlap" is
in existence! When trying to commit changes to the partition tables, it
reports an "Error #717' and bails out. This error is documented as
corresponding to Warning #113 from PARTINFO, "partitions overlap".
So I have to try to make it work again, since there is about 3 GB of unused
space on the drive, and I'd like to make use of it :-)
Regards, Werner
Svend Olaf Mikkelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Remember that unless you want to use a program that complains, there
> is no reason to do anything.
------------------------------
From: "John G. Sandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2nd par port board
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:57:23 GMT
Bob Hauck wrote:
>
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 02:19:46 GMT, John G. Sandell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Anyone know of an add-on parallel port board that doesn't need Windows
> >drivers to make it work?
>
> I've never heard of a parallel port that needed Windows drivers. What
> would that be, a "WinPort"?
>
I hadn't heard of it, either, until I tried 2 boards.
> Any standard parallel port board should work fine, although if it is not
> at the standard LPT2 address you may need to pass a parameter to your
> kernel to tell it the IO port and IRQ. I forget the exact syntax as the
> machine with the weird port is at work, but the "parport.txt" file in
> the Documentation directory of the kernel source is the place to look.
Been there, did that. Have had older ISA par port boards work in Linux
boxes as
parport.txt describes. Tried same setup with these newer boards, no
luck. Linux
correctly finds the boards but they don't respond. SuSE 6.3, 6.4, 7.0.
Also have set up successfully Cyclades multiple terminal serial boards,
no
problem.
John Sandell
>
> --
> -| Bob Hauck
> -| To Whom You Are Speaking
> -| http://www.haucks.org/
------------------------------
From: Markku Kolkka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat 7
Date: 03 Feb 2001 11:44:05 +0200
MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The bashing is mostly the result of RH installing a new compiler that is
> not considered acceptable by many users. As I understand it, it's fine for
> everything but the kernel
The version on the install disks isn't, but the updated vesion clearly
is, the kernel in the RedHat "Fisher" beta version is compiled with
it:
Linux version 2.4.0-0.99.11 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)) #1 Wed Jan 24 16:07:17 EST 2001
--
Markku Kolkka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Mcclain)
Subject: Re: Moving boot
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:04:11 GMT
Howdy Chris,
Free advice is worth what it costs and I haven't tried this
but I've been booting Linux on /dev/hdc for months with loadlin.
The requirement is that the kernel be below the 1024 cyl mark.
I've a copy of the kernel on a dos partition I think it's G:
I suggest you put /boot on /dev/hda2 which your fdisk dump
says is 30M linux and bootable.
It won't cost much to try and seems less trouble than
upgrading packages if it works.
G'Luck,
MiKe
-=> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to ALL <=-
CH> I have redhat 6.0 installed on a pentium 90 with 4 hard drives. When I
CH> installed it I had to use a floppy to boot because of the locations of
CH> the partitions I was using for linux but now I have cleared some
CH> /dev/hda2 * 495 524 30240 83 Linux
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.31
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 04:02:59 -0600
From: Isaac Venn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tar files
I always used winzip for that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a game that has been downloaded as a .tar file. How do you expand
> it if your o/s is win95? Regards GF
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: removing partition with data in it
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:46:34 -0600
doug edmunds wrote:
> I have 2 linux partitions, /dev/hdc2 and /dev/hdc5, both have data in them.
> /dev/hdc5 is /home
> I want to merge the data all into one partition, so the
> other will be empty.
> My idea --
> 1- make a new directory in the first partition i.e., /newhome.
> 2- copy everything from /home to /newhome
> 3- unmount /dev/hdc5
> 4- rename /newhome to /home
> 5- edit /etc/fstab to remove /dev/hdc5
> 6- reboot
>
> Will that work? Too many steps, missed something?
First you may want to log in as root and run "telinit 1" to make
sure nothing's using the /home filesystem before you change
things. Then move your data over to the new directory. I
recommend cd-ing to /home and then running "tar cf - .|(cd
/newhome; tar xvf -)" as this will preserve all your ownerships,
permissions, sym-links, etc. Unmount or rename the old /home
directory, edit fstab and rename /newhome to /home. Then telinit
back to whatever runlevel you usually use. No reboot should be
necessary; this isn't Windows :-)
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Walt, Southern California, USA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:40:20 GMT
All you have to do is read and you'll see that historically, the most
crooked elections have happened in Democratic strongholds: Tamany Hall
(New York City), Chicago under Richard Daley Sr., and the county of Los
Angeles (in recent years) in California.
In Los Angeles, thousands of illegal immigrants, along with people in
local cemeteries, registered and voted in recent elections. And of
course, they voted overwhelmingly Democratic.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" a �crit :
> >
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> > >
> > > >Most of the tamper-friendly voting systems are in Demoncrook-run
counties.
> > > >Why is that?
> > >
> > > Democtratic counties tend to be poorer?
> >
> > Lame EXCUSE
> >
> > You're telling me that even though scan-tron machines are prevelant
> > in every single school in the country, they're suddenly
prohibitively
> > expensive when sold with voting software?
> >
> > I don't buy it.
> >
>
> Then you are an ignorant. 4% error is not important unless the
difference
> between the candidates is below that. When money is scarce in a
county,
> this is usually spent where it's needed the most, in the schools,
police
> and public works. The federal and states should pay for the voting
system
> not the poor local system.
>
> > Especially not when a man CONVICTED of multiple felony counts of
> > ballot-tampering for the benefit of Democrat candidates explained
> > fully well that the whole strategy revolves around the tamperability
> > of punch-card ballots.
> >
>
> There is fraud across the board but most of it is done by the ones who
> can afford it the most. What about those thousands of New Yorkers who
> voted both in New York and Florida? A large portion of absentee
ballots
> were cast by republicans. If you remove all the illegal absentee
ballots
> Al Gore wins big even with the screw up in the largely democratic
counties.
>
> > You remember all the chads that kept getting swept up off the floor
> > in Florida...NEVER allowed to accumulate, lest it become completely
> > fucking obvious what was being done.
> >
>
> Those chads should have been removed from the ballots in the first
place.
> If not punched there is no way in hell one of those chads can come
off.
> You obviously have never seen one of those ballots.
>
> --
> Tired of Microsoft's rebootive multitasking?
> then it's time to upgrade to Linux.
> http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat
> We have all kinds of links
> and many SuSE 7.0 Linux RPM packages
>
--
Secret "Apple Jacks" cereal eater.
I eat them because I like them.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Walt, Southern California, USA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:54:55 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Davey) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Ian Davey wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> As far as Atheists are concerned, god doesn't exist any more
than Santa
> > Claus
> >> >> or the Easter Bunny.
> >> >
> >> >Which *IS* a belief in itself.
> >>
> >> Not true. I read lots of novels and enjoy them, but don't believe
any of the
> >> content as it's just fiction. There's no belief system wrapped up
in it.
> >> There's no need to pay any attention to people who elevate stories
into a
> >> belief system.
> >
The dictionary definition of "atheist" is, "one who denies the existence
of God." That is definitely an active belief.
--
Secret "Apple Jacks" cereal eater.
I eat them because I like them.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "Xavier Houppertz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: zombie process
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:22:05 +0100
Hello,
I have a sybase SQL server running on my redhat server and i see those nasty
zombie processes :
sybase 10457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Jan 23 0:00 (sybmultbuf
<zombie>)
I have a dozen of them (one per day). Is this something caused by my backup
server (i backup every night)
What is it ? Can i remove those ? How ? How can i prevent this ?
That's a lot of questions ...
Any help ?
Thanks
Xavier
------------------------------
From: "Xavier Houppertz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RAM advice
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:38:50 +0100
Hi,
This is just for an advice. Do you think I'm 'easy' with this config or
should i add more memory ?
12:29pm up 72 days, 22:19, 11 users, load average: 0.25, 0.22, 0.16
109 processes: 96 sleeping, 2 running, 11 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 11.5% user, 1.3% system, 0.0% nice, 87.4% idle
Mem: 257088K av, 252764K used, 4324K free, 95864K shrd, 14028K buff
Swap: 130748K av, 8184K used, 122564K free 100220K cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
31052 dir 10 0 17580 17M 2196 S 0 7.4 6.8 0:41 java
30890 dir 6 0 17864 17M 2204 R 0 3.5 6.9 0:53 java
31307 root 6 0 748 748 564 R 0 1.5 0.2 0:02 top
31377 root 5 0 276 276 232 S 0 0.1 0.1 0:00 sleep
24946 dir 0 0 1296 1296 844 S 0 0.1 0.5 0:08 fvwm2
1 root 0 0 336 296 276 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:01 init
2 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:05 kflushd
3 root -12 -12 0 0 0 SW< 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd
30880 root 0 0 10856 10M 1772 S 0 0.0 4.2 0:19 X
444 root 0 0 832 768 640 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:00 bash
270 sybase 0 0 5864 4628 780 S 0 0.0 1.8 1:10
backupserver
29 root 0 0 292 256 240 S 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kerneld
211 bin 0 0 320 300 244 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:00 portmap
225 root 0 0 400 372 320 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:09 syslogd
234 root 0 0 516 344 304 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:00 klogd
245 daemon 0 0 356 320 280 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:00 atd
256 root 0 0 440 400 360 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:00 crond
31511 root 5 0 736 736 540 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:13
printstock2
264 sybase 2 0 29076 21M 22072 S 0 0.0 8.6 608:15 dataserver
263 sybase 0 0 624 520 516 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:00 RUN_SYBASE
290 root 0 0 1092 688 504 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:00 named
268 sybase 0 0 612 508 504 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:00
RUN_SYB_BACK
23638 root 0 0 1500 1492 1152 S 0 0.0 0.5 0:00 xdm
315 root 0 0 540 520 428 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:00 rpc.mountd
324 root 0 0 556 528 428 S 0 0.0 0.2 0:08 rpc.nfsd
349 root 0 0 1060 1060 968 S 0 0.0 0.4 0:01 httpd
338 root 0 0 284 268 236 S 0 0.0 0.1 0:01 gpm
------------------------------
From: "Panagiotis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Modem [linmodem] configuration
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:55:54 +0200
dear sirs,
I own an internal modem by PCTel which, as it is supported by PCTel, it
supports Linux OS
whith the use of the driver PCTel distributes in the CD which comes with the
modem..
due to my lack of knowledge I havent been able to make this work..
the directories are like that
-include/hal.h , pctel.h
/root -src/module/makefile , ptmodule.c
-lib/control.a , dsp.a , hal.a , ptserial.a
here is the makefile:
#
# Makefile for the PCtel module
#
# Note! The CFLAGS definition is now inherited from the
# parent makefile.
#
HPATH = ../../include
FINDHPATH = $(HPATH)/asm $(HPATH)/linux $(HPATH)/scsi $(HPATH)/net
HOSTCC =gcc -I$(HPATH)
HOSTCFLAGS =-O -fomit-frame-pointer
CROSS_COMPILE =
COL_DEBUG_FLAGS =
AS =$(CROSS_COMPILE)as
LD =$(CROSS_COMPILE)ld
CC =$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -Wall $(HOSTCFLAGS) -I$(HPATH)
${COL_DEBUG_FLAGS}
CPP =$(CC) -E
AR =$(CROSS_COMPILE)ar
NM =$(CROSS_COMPILE)nm
STRIP =$(CROSS_COMPILE)strip
MAKE =make
EXTRA_LDFLAGS :=
# object files directory
O_TARGET := ../../lib/pctel.o
# object files
O_OBJS := \
ptmodule.o \
OX_OBJS := \
../../lib/control.a \
../../lib/hal.a \
../../lib/dsp.a \
../../lib/ptserial.a
all_targets: $(O_TARGET) $(L_TARGET)
%.s: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -S $< -o $@
%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
%.o: %.s
$(AS) $(ASFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
ifdef O_TARGET
ALL_O = $(O_OBJS) $(OX_OBJS)
$(O_TARGET): $(ALL_O) Makefile
rm -f $@
$(LD) -r $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(ALL_O)
endif
clean:
rm -f *.o
ifdef L_TARGET
rm -f $(L_TARGET)
endif
ifdef O_TARGET
rm -f $(O_TARGET)
endif
this is the end of the makefile
according to the manual the output shoould be a file in /root/lib called
pctel.o which must
be installed with insmod.. but insmod gives me an error that there is a
kernel mismatch
My kernel is 2.2.16 (I own SuSe 7.0 prof)
Where can I declare in the makefile the fact that my kernel is 2.2.16?
Maybe the problem is on /root/src/module/ptmodule.c take a look at it..
/*
* For the definition of __module_kernel_version[] so that
* the modem driver can be compatible with various Linux kernel
* versions.
*
* This file is to be linked with the rest of the libraries in
* the distribution package.
*/
#include <linux/version.h>
const char __module_kernel_version[] __attribute__((section(".modinfo"))) =
"kernel_version=" UTS_RELEASE;
#ifdef MODVERSIONS
const char __module_using_checksums[] __attribute__((section(".modinfo"))) =
"using_checksums=1";
#endif
Thank you in advance..
P.S I have tried lots of times to edit the scripts both makefile and
ptmodule.c but all i can get
is a headache.. PCTel support sucks too!
This driver is supposed to output a file
/root/lib/pctel.o which I setup with insmod and then
mknod /dev/ttyS15 c 62 79
and here it is /dev/ttyS15
there i do
chmod 666 /dev/ttyS15
and then i link it
ln -sf /dev/ttyS15 /dev/modem
for the use with other programmes like kppp etc..
thats all...
i need all your help, sorry for my bad english i am greek, thats why..
panagiotis
P.S2 sorry for the length of the message
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
