Linux-Misc Digest #109, Volume #27 Wed, 14 Feb 01 12:13:02 EST
Contents:
Win4Lnx (BobNWL)
Re: debian 2.2 unstable ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: Toshiba T2000SX (Russell Marks)
Re: Mail Server Newbie (Michael Heiming)
DPT SmartRAID VI on BIG server ("Doug Forbush")
Re: Can't delete file (Eric Ho)
Re: debian 2.2 unstable (Gerald Willmann)
Auto Mount Daemon Delays (Mark Penkower)
Re: Intruder ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
kde without windows borders (Dirk Groeneveld)
no cdrom with devfs (Dirk Groeneveld)
Re: Where to put hdparm ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Stefan Ohlsson)
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Stefan Ohlsson)
Re: kde without windows borders ("Nils O. Sel�sdal")
Re: Can I use my ATA/100 hard drive with my ATA/66 controller motherboard?
("Mordak")
mpg123 in Lynx ? (Dave Phillips)
Re: Can I use my ATA/100 hard drive with my ATA/66 controller motherboard? (John
Culleton)
Re: Mail Server Newbie (Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner)
Re: Can't delete file (Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner)
Re: A Beginner Asks About Linux (Mark Bratcher)
Re: via ac97 sound drivers for linux (Peter Petersen)
Re: Is here anyone successful compile midnight commander at solaris?
(Mike_Ciccarelli)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (BobNWL)
Date: 14 Feb 2001 13:13:28 GMT
Subject: Win4Lnx
I want to use Linux as my desktop on my job but I need to be careful cause they
are a big windows shop. I thought it would be easier and less trouble
(especially if the so-called pc people come by) to just install Mandrake 7.2
Win4Lnx and then when I knwo they are comming I can jsut boot into windows real
quick.
I run WIndowsNT which has the bootup option screen and the FAT filesystem. Can
I install Win4Lnx on this system with out messing up the NT bootup options
screen?
=================================
Thanks, CyberSlammer Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] AOLIM:BobNWL members.aol.com/bobnwl
www.NWLwrestling.com
www.WildSamoan.com
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: debian 2.2 unstable
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:26:23 GMT
Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last week I did apt-get upgrade and on Monday I booted it for the first
> time after a scheduled power outage that weekend.
> Now the system lasts about a day and then from one second to the next
> every single program segfaults.
> I have no clue why - can't find anything in the logs - and would really
> appreciate any suggestions on how to figure out what is wrong.
Well, it's obviously not debian, since it's stable. Must be your power
supply or ventilator.
> Is there any way to downgrade back? Should I try the unstable branch?
No, debian stable is stable. That's what it means. I run many machines
all perfectly up to date with stable.
> PS: system is a PIII 650 w/ buslogic bt958 and ibm uw disks, matrox g400,
turn off various things until you find the problem. DMA springs to
mind. Were you using the same kernel before?
> smc ethernet and pci128 soundcard but as I said I had uptimes of several
> months on this exact hardware.
Until the hardware changed ...
This is obviously a EBCK. You just have to find it.
Peter
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Toshiba T2000SX
From: Russell Marks <russell.marks@spam^H^H^H^Hntlworld.com>
Date: 14 Feb 2001 13:17:42 +0000
"Darragh � Riord�n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently got my hands on a Toshiba T2000SX. Its pretty old, around 1990-91
> from what I can see. From the information I got from msd it has 2mb RAM,
> 40mb HD and I dont have a clue about processor. I'm guessing its at least
> i386 becuase it is running DOS and Windows 3.1.
Both of which can run on a 286. :-) But the "SX" suggests a 386SX.
> My problem is I want to get a good TCP/IP enabled OS on it. I've tried the
> mini-linux distro's but the 2mb RAM constraint is really killing that idea.
Small Linux (http://www.superant.com/smalllinux/) claims to be
runnable in 2MB, I think.
> I was thinking of trying minix itself becuase the hardware requirments are
> less than what this has and it seems ideal. I Thought I would ask before I
Maybe. Try asking on comp.os.minix and see what they think.
-Rus.
------------------------------
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Server Newbie
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:35:02 +0100
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Michael Heiming wrote:
> >
> > James Horvath wrote:
> >
> > > I am looking to set up a simple Linux mail server at home to collect email
> > > from a number of POP3 accounts, store them on a "mail hub" machine, and
> > > allow access to those messages from Microsoft Outlook 2000 (on a Windows
> > > 2000 Pro machine).
> > >
> > > I have Mandrake Linux 7.2 (minimal install) on a Pentium Celeron 400MHz with
> > > 32MB RAM.
> > >
> > > I have installed sendmail (but haven't gotten too far with configuring it
> > > yet (do I even need this? Would qmail be a better option for a rookie?)),
> > > and fetchmail (which is able to successfully collect my mail from a variety
> > > of accounts and store it on the linux box). I setup local DNS on the linux
> > > machine, and can ping the mailhub from the Windows machines.
> >
> > If sendmail is on your box and running, I asume you just want it to forward all
> >
> > your outgoing mail to your ISP mail server, just edit /etc/sendmail.cf and put
> > this in:
> >
> The experts on comp.mail.sendmail really disfavor diddling
> /etc/sendmail.cf (which is no longer there, but in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
> anyway in the newer versions of sendmail), but recommend editing the
> simpler sendmail.mc file instead. The comparable line would be:
>
> dnl Use your.isp.neme as "smart" relay host. (19.6.47)
> define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.name')
>
> and then re-run m4 to generate the new sendmail.cf file.
True, but as the OP said he would be newbie and sendmail should run on his system
(preinstalled MTA on most distros)
it should be a lot easier for him, to change this one line and reload sendmail, than
figuring
out how to build a new sendmail.cf with m4.
Anyway, his distro should have some tool to set this and make it even easier, but I
don't know about mandrake,
as I use SuSE which comes with yast, that allows easy sendmail setup (ie. if you're
on dialup and want to set sendmail
expensive) of course this setup tool want let you do much with sendmail, but for
most home users it's quite enough...
Michael Heiming
>
>
> > # "Smart" relay host (may be null)
> > DS<your_ISP_mailserver>
> >
> > Don't touch anything else in this file, unless you are absolutly sure what
> > you're doing.
> > Now reload sendmail with it's startup files:
> >
> > /sbin/init.d/sendmail reload
> > or
> > /usr/sbin/rcsendmail reload
> >
> > Send some mails and check
> > /var/log/mail
> >
> > If you have problems post the output!
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > My question is, what do I need to setup to read my mail from my Windows
> > > machine using Outlook 2000? I can read it from Linux using Kmail, etc., so
> > > I know the transfer from the POP accounts worked fine. As stated I can ping
> > > the mailhub (using either the IP address or the name (mailsys.mydomain.com))
> > > from the Windows machine, but Outlook states it can't connect with the
> > > mailhub. Do I need NIS? NFS? Samba? Sendmail? Procmail? Something
> > > else?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > James
> >
> > For POP3 you could go with qpopper from eudora as other suggested, it's easy to
> > setup
> > and comes with detailed instructions.
> >
> > Only problem could be your usage of Outlook, which is prone to make trouble, I
> > would
> > use something different, pegasus or eudora MUA have both more features than
> > anyone
> > needs and work without any problems.
> >
> > Good luck
> >
> > Michael Heiming
>
> --
> .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
> /V\ Registered Machine 73926.
> /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
> ^^-^^ 7:25am up 16 days, 15:52, 4 users, load average: 2.08, 2.08, 2.07
------------------------------
From: "Doug Forbush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: DPT SmartRAID VI on BIG server
Date: 14 Feb 2001 13:37:59 GMT
I put together a linux box at work here, it has the DPT smartRaid VI.. It
also has 2G of RAM on it.. The install was great, simple kernel patch,
compile and install.. The RAID works great IF I tell linux that there is
only 900M RAM.. I'm not sure exactly how high I can go, but at 960M, the
RAID initialization fails and /dev/sdc is not there..
Any ideas on why this happens and how to get back over a gig of RAM?
doug
------------------------------
From: Eric Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't delete file
Date: 14 Feb 2001 13:59:34 GMT
Nope, still doesn't work :
bash-2.03# echo '' > plusnode.gif
bash: plusnode.gif: Operation not permitted
bash-2.03# rm plusnode.gif
rm: cannot remove `plusnode.gif': Value too large for defined data type
bash-2.03#
Best Regards,
Eric Ho
Joseph Holland King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Hi,
> : I am trying to delete a file, but got this error :
> : bash-2.03# rm plusnode.gif
> : rm: cannot remove `plusnode.gif': Value too large for defined data type
> : bash-2.03#
> this should work:
> $ echo '' > plusnode.gif
> $ rm plusnode.gif
> --
> ---
> Joseph Holland King | "God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our
> | conscience, but shouts in our pains: it is His
> | megaphone to rouse a deaf world." C. S. Lewis
------------------------------
From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: debian 2.2 unstable
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:18:44 +0100
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Well, it's obviously not debian, since it's stable. Must be your power
> supply or ventilator.
well, it's called stable but let's take everyone's word for it and look at
hardware.
> > PS: system is a PIII 650 w/ buslogic bt958 and ibm uw disks, matrox g400,
>
> turn off various things until you find the problem. DMA springs to
> mind. Were you using the same kernel before?
we have several of these systems around so I'll try to put my Scsi chain
into another one and see what happens.
> This is obviously a EBCK. You just have to find it.
what's EBCK ???
thanks, Gerald
------------------------------
From: Mark Penkower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Auto Mount Daemon Delays
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:52:56 GMT
I have a P120 with a 1.4 Gig Drive runnning Caldera Open Linux 2.4. If
I reboot the machine it hangs when it gets to the part entitled "Auto
Mount Daemon." It can take up to 4 minutes before it gets past this
step. This does not happen upon subsequent reboots - if they are
performed within a few minutes of the first rebbot.
Why does this take so long to come up - could it indicate a problem with
my Hard Drive?
Thank you
Mark Penkower
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intruder
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:35:42 +0000
rc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> I noticed that the a-hole created 2 or 3 users that were hidden. I removed
> them and closed the ftp access. I am not sure what else to do. Does anyone
> know if sendmail works behind a firewall?
If you leave the sendmail port open it does, yes.
If you only use sendmail for sending mails externally and distributing local
mail, then also yes. (Even with the SMTP port closed to external connection
attempts)
The only advice ANYONE can give you after you've been cracked is...
backup important files such as /etc and /home.
Wipe the hard disk, and reinstall.
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: Dirk Groeneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kde without windows borders
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:42:56 +0100
Hi!
I gambled a bit with kde(2) themes and widget sets and now find myself
without windows borders. How did that happen?
Windows just end, there's no place I could "grab" to resize the window, and
I'm stuck.
What can I do?
Dirk
------------------------------
From: Dirk Groeneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no cdrom with devfs
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:48:58 +0100
Hi!
I just set up a new machine from scratch with a 2.4.1 kernel and devfs.
Everything's just fine, only the cdrom doesn't work. The drive is a
perfectly normal atapi device connected to the primary ide as slave (master
is the hard disc). /proc shows me valid information about it. Now if I only
could mount it...
I tried some symlinking but it didn't work. The devfs faq doesn't contain
much information either, save for praising itself.
Dirk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where to put hdparm
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:39:18 +0000
Pete Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> In which rc.d file is the correct place to put "hdparm -d1 -X34" so that
> these params are set on boot? Or better yet, perhaps they should be
> compiled into the kernel?
Personally, I put it in boot. Just after swap has been activated.
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Ohlsson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Reply-To: Stefan Ohlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Feb 2001 16:37:31 +0100
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:19:47 GMT, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Ohlsson) writes:
>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:52:31 GMT, John Hasler wrote:
>>>Who are "the" atheists?
>>>Stefan Ohlsson writes:
>>>>I know the atheists have a theory that man will develop to a super-man
>>>>that can travel back in time and will create it all. That's the simple
>>>>version anyway. I know, sounds weird.
>>Are you complaining about "grammar"? I'm sorry, but I'm not a native
>>speaker of this language.
>no we are not complaining about grammar. we are complaining about
>what seems to be your implicit assumption that atheists share some
>beliefs beyond simply not believing in an active god or gods.
>
I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I made an inappropriate generalization.
That was presented as an atheist theory however, by a man that said he
had been an atheist (and therefore, I assume, should know).
>>How do they explain the universe? Or don't they?
>some explain the universe; some don't. it depends upon which atheist
>you ask.
>
OK.
/Stefan
--
[ Stefan Ohlsson ] � There will always be survivors - Robert A. Heinlein � []
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Ohlsson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Reply-To: Stefan Ohlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Feb 2001 16:39:53 +0100
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:47:37 GMT, John Hasler wrote:
>Stefan Ohlsson writes:
>>How do they explain the universe?
>How do theists explain God?
>
I'd like to know that too.. but they usually don't.
/Stefan
--
[ Stefan Ohlsson ] � There will always be survivors - Robert A. Heinlein � []
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kde without windows borders
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:45:18 +0100
"Dirk Groeneveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi!
>
> I gambled a bit with kde(2) themes and widget sets and now find myself
> without windows borders. How did that happen?
> Windows just end, there's no place I could "grab" to resize the window,
and
> I'm stuck.
for a start: go to a console and type: kwin
------------------------------
From: "Mordak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Can I use my ATA/100 hard drive with my ATA/66 controller motherboard?
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:46:22 GMT
Thanks to both of you.
Mordak
"Federico Bravo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| I currently use an ATA 100 HDD on ATA66 controller and RedHat 7.0. It
works
| fine.
| About performance I can only say that I tried ATA66 and ATA100 running
Windows
| and I DID notice higher speed on ATA100. ( I think Windows sees ATA100 as
SCSI,
| by the way ).
| Bye, Federico.
|
|
|
|
| Mordak wrote:
|
| > Hi all,
| > I just purchased a new 60GB Western Digital HD. It's an ATA/100 IDE
drive
| > and
| > I want to run it on my motherboards (Tyan Trinity S2380 and a Athlon
650)
| > ATA/66 controller - is this possible? I know an older drive can run on a
| > newer controller but I'm unsure about it the other way.
| >
| > Also, will SuSE 7.0/7.1 Pro have a problem with it? I plan on having it
set
| > up to have SuSE, FreeBSD, and Peanut Linux running on it to start and
then I
| > plan on adding Slackware and Debian in a couple of months.
| >
| > I guess I will be surprised if the answer is no with the backward
| > compatibility issue. I do have a CMD ATA/100 PCI Card but I don't
believe it
| > has any Linux drivers at this point. At least not that I have found.
| > Thanks,
| > Mordak
|
------------------------------
From: Dave Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mpg123 in Lynx ?
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:35:43 -0500
Greetings:
A simple question:
Has anyone successfully configured the Lynx text-mode Web browser
with mpg123 in order to hear m3u (Icecast) and pls (Shoutcast) MP3
playlists ? I'm fine with standalone MP3s, but I get this error with the
streaming playlist stuff:
High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3.
Version 0.59r (1999/Jun/15). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
Uses code from various people. See 'README' for more!
THIS SOFTWARE COMES WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY! USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
/home/dlphilp/[playlist]: No such file or directory
That's from trying to run a Shoutcast link. Here's what I get from a
playlist link on mp3.com :
High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3.
Version 0.59r (1999/Jun/15). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
Uses code from various people. See 'README' for more!
THIS SOFTWARE COMES WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY! USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
/home/dlphilp/http://downloads.mp3.com/AAIBQujbEQBBMRBtKwGAwARub3JtUCAAAABSDgAAAFE2AAAAUxoAAABUAQAAAEOLrYo6TwUQ3B7MDXE7bBlTYltgeg--/asking_your_forgiveness.mp3:
No such file or directory
I don't know how, when, or why my $HOME gets prepended to the URL.
Any suggestions out there ??
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm
The Linux Soundapps Site at http://sound.condorow.net
------------------------------
From: John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I use my ATA/100 hard drive with my ATA/66 controller motherboard?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:16:19 GMT
>compatibility issue. I do have a CMD ATA/100 PCI Card but I don't believe it
>has any Linux drivers at this point. At least not that I have found.
>Thanks,
>Mordak
In general ATA devices are supported by recent kernels. And PCI is no sweat
with recent kernels. What does the CMD card do? Is it an HD controller, an
Ethernet NIC or what?
John Culleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Server Newbie
Date: 14 Feb 2001 16:17:03 GMT
Rod Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not a big sendmail fan myself, but it does have one big advantage
> for most Linux users: It comes with most Linux distributions.
Hey, Windows came with my computer, but I don't regard it as an
advantage. <g> I agree that usually sendmail in your distribution's
default configuration will do what you want without too much trouble. The
problems arise when you want to start changing things. A guy sophisticated
enough to set up his own multi-drop mail server will probably want to do that.
Of course, he could probably grok sendmail well enough to do what he wants,
but why go through the extra pain? (Not to mention sendmail's rotten security
record, although it _has_ gotten better as of late.)
JDW
------------------------------
From: Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't delete file
Date: 14 Feb 2001 16:28:35 GMT
Eric Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, still doesn't work :
> bash-2.03# echo '' > plusnode.gif
> bash: plusnode.gif: Operation not permitted
> bash-2.03# rm plusnode.gif
> rm: cannot remove `plusnode.gif': Value too large for defined data type
OK, then...what does 'ls -l plusnode.gif' say? What does
'lsattr plusnode.gif' say? It's possible that the immutable flag is set,
although the message you get is not usually "Operation not permitted".
How about 'cp /dev/null plusnode.gif'?
JDW
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Bratcher)
Subject: Re: A Beginner Asks About Linux
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:23:24 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Noah Roberts wrote:
>>
>> They are incredibly unstable since they base their system on
>> > bleeding edge Alpha software, the system is almost entirely unsuitable for
>> > anything.
>>
>> Like, for example...
>
>gcc
>
My gcc works fine. So does cc.
--
Mark Bratcher
To reply, remove both underscores (_) from my email name
===========================================================
Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!
------------------------------
From: Peter Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: via ac97 sound drivers for linux
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:49:32 +0100
On 12 Feb 2001 13:39:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Byron A Jeff) wrote:
>ALSA does work. Just a couple of caveats to add.
>
>1) I can't get DSP to operate any faster than 11025 Hz. It sounds OK but I'd
>be interested in seeing how to get higher quality audio.
>
>2) If you wish not to be driven crazy, install the oss compatibility modules
>for dsp and mixer. Then you can use all the standard apps and mixers instead
>of the ALSA specific ones.
>
>3) IMPORTANT!!! ALSA mutes all channels by default. It drives those who are
>unaware nuts. Make sure you bring up a mixer and unmute the channels before
>troubleshooting anything else.
Hello!
VIA AC97 gave me a hard time under linux. Yes, it is true that ALSA
works, but if you are interested in games (the quake series) you are out
of luck (have been looking for help here in this group as well as
researching google etc.): There are no drivers for VIA AC97 that support
the "mmap" features quake needs, or did anyone manage to get sound in
quake working with this chipset?
Regards
Peter Petersen
------------------------------
From: Mike_Ciccarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Is here anyone successful compile midnight commander at solaris?
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:54:16 -0500
Actually, it's looking for glib-config SCRIPT (i think it's a script anyways)
executable. It NEEDS to be in your path. You might end up needing gtk-config and
esd-config and many others, depending on what libs it needs.
1) Make sure glib-config is in path
2) Make sure you do: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib (or
whereever you installed to)
Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> In comp.unix.solaris Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : As title, is there anyone success use midnight commander at solaris? I
> : can't compile it, the problem is:
>
> export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/glib -R/usr/local/lib/glib" and then
> reconfigure.
>
> Or you can download a version from
> http://www.clark.net/pub/bent/Solaris8-X86/GNOME
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
