Linux-Misc Digest #127, Volume #27               Fri, 16 Feb 01 20:13:04 EST

Contents:
  Slow sound problem ("Eero Torri")
  Re: How can I get rid of "bash"? ("Doney")
  ps ax as non-root doesn't show all processes in Mandrake 7.0 (Tony R. Bennett)
  Re: Unpacking ISO-images without a CD burner ("Jeremia d.")
  Re: Printer won't respond to 'cat testfile > /dev/lp0' ("Cameron Kerr")
  silly networking problem - 2 ethernet cards (Bob Griffith)
  Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Johan Kullstam)
  Upgrading RPM (Mark Robinson)
  Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else) (Johan Kullstam)
  Re: Default path to include .h header files under linux with gcc (JCA)
  Exiting programs. (Rolie Baldock)
  Size of LINUX (Rolie Baldock)
  Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Steve Mading)
  Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Steve Mading)
  Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Steve Mading)
  Re: Printer won't respond to 'cat testfile > /dev/lp0' (John Hasler)
  Re: safe rm (Herb Stein)
  Pan 0.9.3 and Localtime ("Felix Tilley")
  Re: safe rm ("Rinaldi J. Montessi")
  Re: Exiting programs. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  User permissions for vfat mount ("Scott L. Foglesong")
  Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else (Mike Flournoy)
  Re: Default path to include .h header files under linux with gcc (Jan Schaumann)
  Re: ftp betwixt windoze and linux? (John Thompson)
  Re: Gimp-Print (John Thompson)
  Re: Simple fax program (Edwin Johnson)
  Re: Extracting files from rpms (John Thompson)
  Re: Win4Lnx (John Thompson)
  Re: Passowrd authentication probs using OpenSSH 2.3.0 (Sven Heinecke)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Eero Torri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slow sound problem
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:21:50 GMT

Has anyone stepped before in this kind of a problem?

I have linux 2.2.16-22 in a compaq armada 4131T and when I use "play" to
play the sndconfig sound sample everything works just fine and I hear Linus
explainig the prononciation of linux in normal speed.

But when I try to play an mp3 with freshly installed mpg123-0.59r the sound
comes out with wrong speed like the sound samples were played in half the
speed.

Could this be in the libraries, kernel, hardware or what?

thnx



------------------------------

From: "Doney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I get rid of "bash"?
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:50:46 GMT

Tanks a million to all,
I found the problem and it was:
I first was login in to my user account and then "su" to "root".
Solution: To be able to do what I needed to do( basically configurations
such us: turbonetcfg) I need to signup as root directly from the login
promt.
Doney.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony R. Bennett)
Subject: ps ax as non-root doesn't show all processes in Mandrake 7.0
Date: 16 Feb 2001 13:49:39 -0800


The subject really says it all.

As root I can do a 'ps ax' and get all processes.
As a non-root user I do a 'ps ax' and get only my processes.

If I chmod 4755 (or 6755) /bin/ps, root still works but non-root shows this
error message:  
        This /bin/ps is not secure for setuid operation.

Any help you can give will be appreciated...

-tony
-- 
Anti-spam filter: I am not root@localhost 
trb@teleport dot com   COM  Public Access User --- Not affiliated with Teleport

------------------------------

From: "Jeremia d." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Unpacking ISO-images without a CD burner
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:56:49 GMT

sandy wrote:
> 
> You should at least give full directions before suggesting this.
> Mount how?  How do you run the install to point to the
> partition?  Is this distro specific?
> 
> "Jeremia d." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > He could just download the iso image and mount it like a regular cd.
> > Anthony Purcell wrote:
> >
> > > You can download and install at the same time! Download the net bootdisk
> and
> > > when it prompts for installation method choose ftp and point it to
> sunsite
> > > or freesoftware.com. I use this method all the time why waste cds and or
> > > disk space downloading iso's when you can just do it from the net. Im
> > > assuming you have broadband connectivity if you are downloading iso
> images
> > > :o)
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Richard Snow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I try to download and install Linux on my computer, but I haven't
> got a
> > > CD
> > > > > burner.
> > > > > The only download methods I can find on the net is iso-images or all
> the
> > > > > individual files from FTP, which would take me days to download.
> > > > > So I'm wondering if there's any way to unpack or convert the
> ISO-images
> > > to
> > > > > individual files without having to burn a CD.
> > > > > Or if anyone know of a site to download SuSE Linux 7 as a ZIP or
> similar
> > > > > archive file.
> > > > > All help appreciated, and please no answers like "buy a CD burner".
> > > > >
> > > > > Audun
> > > >
> > > > try www.cheapbytes.com and order a cd shipped to you.  ONly a few
> > > > dollars plus shipping.
> >
> > --
> > A little experience often upsets a lot of theory.
> >
> >
> >

Look at the post, is that not clear enough? 'You just mount like a
regular cd'
-- 
A little experience often upsets a lot of theory.

------------------------------

From: "Cameron Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printer won't respond to 'cat testfile > /dev/lp0'
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:24:47 +1300

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Law"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I can't get my printer to print to my Canon BJC-2010 from either of my
> new RH6.2 installations: my router or my (dual-booting) laptop.  The
> laptop WILL print to it when booted into Win98, and the router WILL
> print to it when I boot it from a Win98 hard drive.  In both Win98s, the
> 
> IRQ is automatically set to "7". The following info is also true for
> both machines:
> ------------------
> - after booting up, there is nothing about parport or IRQ7 showing in
> the /proc directory. Is that normal?

Yes, because you're running the lp driver as a module, so you won't see
anything in /proc relating to it until the modules is loaded by the
kermel (in this case it is autoloaded), and can register itself in /proc

> -------------------
> - But after I try a 'cat /etc/printcap > /dev/lp0' (which produces NO
> response from the printer), I _do_ find a /proc/parport directory, with
> an
> '0' directory, containing 4 entries.  The 'hardware' entry shows
>      base:    0x378 irq:       7 dma:    none modes:    SPP,PS2

Printing plain text this way can be dodgy on Postscript printers. So I
imagine that InkJet printers are no different in this respect. Mostlikely
you have the printcap entries set wrongly. The Win98 boxen are set to
print to this type of printer, so they send output suitable for it. The
linux boxen probably are not, and just send raw input.

Send us the /etc/printcap of the print server, and a client. Aditionally,
Redhat has a tool call printtool (GUI) that does a fairly good job of
setting up a printer. You might like to upgrade from lpd to CUPS, which
is probably a better choice for inkjets, since drivers are constantly
being made.

> When I run 'dmesg', I see
>      parport 0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,PS2] parport 0: Printer,
>      Canon BJC-2000, and lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven)
> Does all that look reasonable?  Or should there be a setting for the
> dma?

Looks fine. DMA should not be neccesary.

> --------------------
> My /etc/conf.modules file contains the lines
>      alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc  and options parport_pc io=0x378
>      irq=7,auto
> 
> What should I now try?  I've run out of ideas.

How about

send the file to the printer
echo -e "\f" > /dev/lp0

This will send a form feed (eject) to the printer, which should make it
print the page.

HIH -- Cameron Kerr

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Griffith)
Subject: silly networking problem - 2 ethernet cards
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:04:36 GMT

I have installed Mandrake 7.1 on a pc at work.  I intend to use it as
a cache/router.

When I first set it up I only had 1 ethernet card on the machine and
this set up fine - talked to the lan and to the router on our system.

My next step was to add a 2nd ethernet card.  I installed the card and
it seems to be working ok - using this card I can browse my lan and
contact my router - but the first card won't do this any more

I must have done something daft or left something out - could someone
either suggest a solution or point me at a howto/faq somewhere?  I
have looked at the howto at the linux doc project for ethernet but
this hasn't solved the problem - the hardware is recognised ok.  I
think I've done somethingto the routing but I can't see what.

TIA

BobG
============  ** Remove spamguard before replying **  ====================
Bob Griffith                                 "The Earth is but one country
nb "Dormouse"                                 and mankind its citizens"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                      - Baha'u'llah

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:08:39 GMT

"Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> In comp.os.linux.misc Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In comp.os.linux.misc Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >>> Then,  to your mind the blind should not believe in light,  nor the
> >>> deaf ins sound?
> 
> >> They have good evidence for the existence of light. They can perform
> >> experiments to verify its existence. For example, they can get two
> >> seeing friends to stand 100 yards apart. They can whisper to one
> >> and ask him to raise a handkerchief, or drop it to the ground. They can
> >> then walk the 100 yards to the other friend, and ask him if they
> >> had whispered the command to raise or drop to the other friend. Repeat
> >> to taste.
> 
> >> Then try it when the two friends are separated by a tall building.
> 
> > How does he know that all his friends are not really voices in his
> > head?
> 
> He doesn't. That is a separate theory that requires separate testing.
> 
> 
> 
> > What is the difference between a "fixpoint theorem" and a "faith
> > in a belief"?
> 
> Fixpoint theorems can be proved purely formally, without any recourse to
> semantics.  "every contraction mapping in a locally compact metric space
> has a fixed point".  "Every increasing continuous functional in a
> distributive lattice has a fixed point", etc.  etc.  For the locally
> compact metric space take R3 and you get the "hairy ball theorem"
                            ^^
                          you mean S^2.

> (comb a ball and there is a bald patch - actually an even more
> interesting pair of points too).  For the lattice take the sentences
> of an axiom system, connected by the entailment relation, and for
> the functional take the provability operator, and you find that
> there's an interesting sentence ...

and then you look at physical systems and their behavior and somehow
they match certain mathematics, or their behavior stimulates the
development of mathematics.  i find it surprising and fascinating that
nature follows some rather simple mathematical rules.  for example,
out of all the possible functions out there, why do continuous ones
work so often?

-- 
J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Upgrading RPM
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:10:00 GMT

Is there a way to upgrade from RPM3 to 4 without trashing the db or
having to start a new db?

Mark

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else)
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:10:05 GMT

Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Johan Kullstam wrote:
> > 
> > Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Bloody Viking wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Walt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > : In Los Angeles, thousands of illegal immigrants, along with people in
> > > > : local cemeteries, registered and voted in recent elections.  And of
> > > > : course, they voted overwhelmingly Democratic.
> > > >
> > > > And in Florida, the GOP does the same crap. And we all know about
> > > > the election debacle that ensued.
> > >
> > > So why did Gore only challenge the counts in DEMONCROOK-controlled
> > > counties?
> > 
> > it's a simple matter of statistics.  imagine two voting districts.
> > one 70% repulican, 30% democrat.  one 30% R and 70% D.
> > say that 10% of all ballots are not counted for whatever reason.
> > suppose further that political affiliation is independent to
> > counted/uncounted ballots.  then, every ballot recovered in the
> > former, largely republican district, will be more likely to be
> > republican.  in the latter district, they will tend to be democratic.
> > of course gore will push for a recount where it will help him most.
> > 
> 
> It still doesn't change the fact that by challenging their counts,
> Gore was calling the Democrat-run election boards a bunch of liars.

are you trying to imply that al gore challenged the results in
democrat controlled voting districts in order to call them a bunch of
liars?   or are you trying to change the subject?

> 
> > both parties did what they could to win.  believing the rhetoric of
> > either of them is silly.

-- 
J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Default path to include .h header files under linux with gcc
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:07:18 -0800

    The standard way is to use the -I option when invoking
the compiler.


Ramin Sina wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Suppose I have a C file with a header include statement  #include "foo.h".
> Does anyone know what  path is searched to find this header file for Red
> Hat 6.2 and Calder eDesktop 2.4? How do I change this path in my .bashrc?
>
> Thanks,
> Ramin Sina


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rolie Baldock)
Subject: Exiting programs.
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:32:19 GMT

My friend has just installed LINUX in a machine.(He's Game).
I'm still chicken. 
    He is finding it difficult to exit jobs, <Control-C> doesn't seem
to work and <esc> doesn't seem to work, so what is the sure fire way
to kill a job stone dead instantly?


--Rolie Baldock.  email:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rolie Baldock)
Subject: Size of LINUX
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:38:27 GMT

Back in the days of the DEC PDP-6 we ran a TIME SHARING operating
system in 4K words of memory. Now some horrendous amount of bytes are
required to run an operating system such as LINUX which does not seem
to provide any more intelligence than the old PDP-6 operating system.
Doesn't seem to show any degree of cleverness to my way of thinking.
In those days all operating systems were written in assembly
language!!!!!   I rest my case.


--Rolie Baldock.  email:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: 16 Feb 2001 23:34:41 GMT

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

: You ask that I fall on my knees and thank the higher power 
: "Science" for my existance. I prefer to thank it's creator.

Mankind?  Science is, without a doubt, unarguably, a creation
of Mankind.  Why?  Becasue it's a technique, a process.  It's
a method of learning things.  This is true whether or not you
believe God created the universe.  The things learned are not
themselves 'science'.  Science is the name for the process, not
the end result.  Saying God created science is like saying God
created Robert's Rules of Order.


------------------------------

From: Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: 16 Feb 2001 23:36:41 GMT

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

: That's why Materialism is hopelessly flawed. We all know that JFK
: was shot, but can't repeat the experiment. How do we go about
: proving a historical event.

WTF does that have to do with materialism?


------------------------------

From: Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: 16 Feb 2001 23:38:00 GMT

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


: My comments where not being used as a proof. I am bored by Materialist
: because their phylosophy is so easily shown to be false.

Nobody's done it yet.  WTF are you talking about?


------------------------------

From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Printer won't respond to 'cat testfile > /dev/lp0'
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:57:48 GMT

Cameron Kerr writes:
> Printing plain text this way can be dodgy on Postscript printers. So I
> imagine that InkJet printers are no different in this respect.

Yes.  Not only will my BJC1000 not print plain text, but asking it to do so
hangs it.
-- 
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin

------------------------------

From: Herb Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: safe rm
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:03:33 -0600

This is not Windows. When you delete something, it SHOULD be gone.
Does your garbage collection company save your trash in case you need
to recover you old bag of trash that your wife dropped her ring into?
LINUX is a real operating system. I hate the "Are you sure?" prompts
from windows. I meant it when I typed it. That isn't a bug. That's a
feature.

S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Do you know a program that replace the ordinary rm with 'safe rm' that
> move the objects into a 'trash folder' instead of delete it right away?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>                                    S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
>   _____  _____  _____  _____
>  /____  /____/ /____/ /____          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _____/ /      /    / _____/      http://www.arifsaha.com/


------------------------------

From: "Felix Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pan 0.9.3 and Localtime
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:10:02 GMT

I got a nice note from one of the people at Pan.

To get local time when reading articles, select

Edit
     Preferences
                  Display - Threads


and toggle the UTC button.



Felix Tilley

------------------------------

From: "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: safe rm
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 19:16:45 -0500

Back to the original question:

TkDesk can be easily configured to either zap or mv to trash.  If you
have zapped a file Midnight Commander has the ability to recover if not
stomped on.  

Herb Stein wrote:
> 
> This is not Windows. When you delete something, it SHOULD be gone.
> Does your garbage collection company save your trash in case you need
> to recover you old bag of trash that your wife dropped her ring into?
> LINUX is a real operating system. I hate the "Are you sure?" prompts
> from windows. I meant it when I typed it. That isn't a bug. That's a
> feature.
> 
> S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Do you know a program that replace the ordinary rm with 'safe rm' that
> > move the objects into a 'trash folder' instead of delete it right away?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> >                                    S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
> >   _____  _____  _____  _____
> >  /____  /____/ /____/ /____          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > _____/ /      /    / _____/      http://www.arifsaha.com/

-- 
Rinaldi]$
When we remember we are all mad the mysteries disappear and
life stands explained.  - Mark Twain

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exiting programs.
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:17:35 GMT

Rolie Baldock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>     He is finding it difficult to exit jobs, <Control-C> doesn't seem
> to work and <esc> doesn't seem to work, so what is the sure fire way
> to kill a job stone dead instantly?

This question is way too vague to give a solid answer. In fact I
suspect it might not be the question required to provoke answers that
solve the root problem.

If you post more details, someone can probably help.


-- 
Jim Buchanan        [EMAIL PROTECTED]     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================== http://www.buchanan1.net/ ==========================
"Tyger! Tyger! burning bright In the forests of the night,
 What immortal hand or eye Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?" -Blake
================= Visit: http://www.thehungersite.com ==================

------------------------------

From: "Scott L. Foglesong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: User permissions for vfat mount
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:21:03 -0800

Hello all--

I have several vfat partitions (i.e., FAT32) mounted as //mnt/drivec,
and //mnt/drived. These come up just fine (they're in fstab).

However, they're accessible for writing only by root. I've tried
changing the mode to allow all users to read-write, but that doesn't
seem to work.

I've also played around some with the DOS options (that you see in the
LinuxConf settings for accessing local drives in RH7), but anything I do
there seems to render the partition almost unaccessible across the
board.

Could someone point me in the right direction for finding out how to
deal with this? I looked through the HOWTOs and I didn't find anything
that seemed specific to this kind of a problem--although perhaps the
information is somewhere in there, and I overlooked it.

Any help you could offer would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Scott Foglesong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
From: Mike Flournoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:13:06 GMT

in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Martel at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2/15/01 12:16 AM:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 04:36:06 GMT, "Peter T. Breuer"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Agreed. It is after all, very difficult to program a computer using
>> religious beliefs as a basis for your programming. I tend to view that
>> as evidence that scientific belief is qualitatively different, since
>> believing in scientific principles like observation, no-interpretation,
>> experiment, hypothesiis formation and refutation, does help you program
>> a computer.
> 
> Computers were designed using science so it's not surprising you need
> science to program them. Try using science to make sense of something
> created using religion or philosophy. Say, the Book of Tao?  :-)
> 
 Read " The Dancing Wu Li Masters " by Gary Zukav. It does an excellent job
of re-enforcing one with the other. It is also the best and most readable
introduction to physics that I have ever read.

              Mike


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Schaumann)
Subject: Re: Default path to include .h header files under linux with gcc
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:31:10 GMT

* Ramin Sina wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Suppose I have a C file with a header include statement  #include "foo.h". 
> Does anyone know what  path is searched to find this header file for Red 
> Hat 6.2 and Calder eDesktop 2.4? How do I change this path in my .bashrc?

depends on your compiler and on the options passed on to the compiler.

Try
man gcc
if you use gcc or substitute whatever copiler you're using for gcc

Usually it's /usr/include and $LIBDIR/include

$LIBDIR can be specified in your ~/.bashrc

-Jan

-- 
Jan Schaumann <http://www.netmeister.org>

http://usvms.gpo.gov/findings_index.html

------------------------------

From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftp betwixt windoze and linux?
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:45:04 -0600

Bill Parker wrote:

> I have RH6.2 on my laptop... I have it networked via a ethernet card to a
> hub, likewise my desktop PC. What Iwant to do is transfer files betwixt them
> 
> I can ping each machine,  but if I try and ftp from linux to windoze, I get
> "Connection refused"
> 
> If I try and ftp from windoze to linux, ftp explorer, or even the ms-dos ftp
> command, starts to dial up the internet i.e. it tries to connect via the
> modem, rather than the ethernet card
> 
> Any tips, clues, hints on how I can xfer files between the two machines?

Chances are you don't have an ftp server running on the Windows
machine.  Windows does not include an ftp server, so you'll need
to hunt down a third-party ftp server and install it.

-- 


-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gimp-Print
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:29:48 -0600

Leonard Evens wrote:

> "N. Emons" wrote:
> >
> > I am using SuSE 6.3 and Gimp 1.1.11
> > I want to compile Gimp-Print 4.1.0
> > I get a compile error, /usr/include/libgimp not found
> > I have no idea how to link it???

> You are unlikely to be able to compile a current version of
> Print with such an early version of the Gimp. 

I was able to compile gimp-print to work with Gimp v1.0.4.  You
do need to have gimp-devel installed, though, and that's where
you'll get libgimp.

-- 


-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Johnson)
Subject: Re: Simple fax program
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12 Feb 2001 14:09:47 GMT

The program xfax is a great front end to efax and is easy to configure. I
use it all of the time.

...Edwin

On 11 Feb 2001 17:39:14 GMT, Eric Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am looking for a fax program that can simply send/receive faxes.
>I have looked at Hylafax, but it seems to be an overkill.
>Could someone suggest other packages that is EASY to configure
>and use ?
>I am running Slackware if that matters.
>
>Thanks a million.
>
>Best Regards,
>Eric Ho
>


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~   Edwin Johnson ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ~
~        http://www.shreve.net/~elj       ~
~                                         ~
~ "Once you have flown, you will walk the ~
~ earth with your eyes turned skyward,    ~
~ for there you have been, there you long ~
~ to return." -- da Vinci                 ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


------------------------------

From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Extracting files from rpms
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:08:06 -0600

Dag wrote:
 
> Does anybody know of a way to just extract individual files from rpm's?
> I want to look at some of the files, but I don't want to install the rpm
> to do it.

I use TkZip for this.

-- 


-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win4Lnx
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:17:56 -0600

Arctic Storm wrote:

>  I want to use Linux as my desktop on my job but I need to be careful cause
> > they are a big windows shop. I thought it would be easier and less trouble
> > (especially if the so-called pc people come by) to just install Mandrake
> > 7.2 Win4Lnx and then when I knwo they are comming I can juts boot into
> > windows real quick.
> >
> > I run WIndowsNT which has the bootup option screen and the FAT filesystem.
> > Can I install Win4Lnx on this system with out messing up the NT bootup
> > options screen?

> When you say "... just boot into windows real quick", do you mean switch
> between Windows and Linux on the fly?  No such thing; you must reboot your
> computer to switch between OS'es.

Unless you use VMware, but that's probably overkill for a decoy. 
I like the idea of using an MS backdrop.  You could probably
capture a screen dump of a Windows desktop with the Start bar
thingie and a couple appropriate-looking applications on screen
and use that as your linux backdrop.  Iconify your apps when the
wrong people are in the neighborhood (or use a window manager
with Windows-like controls).  That's probably close enough to
fool the kind of people who are overly concerned about such
things.

-- 


-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

From: Sven Heinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Passowrd authentication probs using OpenSSH 2.3.0
Date: 17 Feb 2001 00:43:56 GMT


There was an article about ssh in the January edition of Gazette:

http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue61/dellomodarme.html

perhaps that helps?

Sven

Remove SPAM to send mail.


Clive DaSilva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I am running slackware 7.1, kernel 2.4.1 and I installed the latest
> version of OpenSSH 2.3.0. The install seemed to go ok, considering
> that somewhere I read that there was a problem with password
> authentication on slackware and the suggested patch was to set up the
> config in the following fashion
> 
> LIBS=-lcrypt ./configure , then make, make install, etc
> 
> Now im trying to ssh into my linux box from my windows box (using
> securecrt -- ssh1 protocol) and my password authentication keeps
> failing. I get the following message in /var/log/messages on mu linux
> box :
> 
> sshd[session id] bad-auth-msg-4 for illegal user <my user name>
> 
> I'm sure I'm missing something really simple. Any suggestions would be
> appreciated.
> 
> 

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to