Linux-Misc Digest #379, Volume #27 Sat, 17 Mar 01 14:13:01 EST
Contents:
What is the [] in ps -ef output (Jeff B)
Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7 ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 10 gig disk in a 500 meg BIOS (Rick Griffiths)
Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7 ("Peter T. Breuer")
MGEN ("Rick")
Re: Scrambled mouse cursor in X11? (Doug O'Leary)
outlook and ssl crash ("P. Ekkebus")
Watermark ("N. Emons")
Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output (William Burrow)
Suse 7.1 with 2.4 kernel: masquerading ("Valentin Schwarz")
Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output (Jeff B)
Re: Suse 7.1 with 2.4 kernel: masquerading (Andrew Williams)
Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output (Paul Kimoto)
Re: PPP dialer that handles dynamic one-time passwords? (Ralph Spitzner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff B)
Subject: What is the [] in ps -ef output
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:12:00 GMT
Anyone have an idea of what a process name enclosed in [] (i.e. square
brackets) means on the output of a ps -ef command.
O/S is RetHat 6.2 - command is: /bin/ps -ef
As in:
root 2 1 0 Feb25 ? 00:00:00 [kflushd]
root 3 1 0 Feb25 ? 00:00:01 [kupdate]
root 4 1 0 Feb25 ? 00:00:00 [kpiod]
root 5 1 0 Feb25 ? 00:00:00 [kswapd]
root 6 1 0 Feb25 ? 00:00:00 [mdrecoveryd]
Answer is worth a couple of bonus points in my Linux class for the
first correct response.
Any help will be greatly appreciated...
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:14:12 +0100
In comp.os.linux.misc Clint Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I'm kinda new to inetd, but have been using variants of *nix for years.
> I installed RH7 from the RHL7 Bible book (workstation install with GNOME).
> Works fine. But, when I try to telnet to the system from another machine on
> my network, I can't. So, I did a port scan and found smtp, sun-rpc, spooler
Is there something strange about that? Do you EXPECT telnet (the clear
text, unencrypted, reference utility of tcp terminal sessions) to be
installed and running on a default install?
> and motorola cable modem test ports open (25, 111, 515, and 1024). Seems
> kinda strange. No telnet (port 23).
Install telnetd. Think about enabling it. Don't use it (you are clearly NOT
an administrator). When you find root logins over telnet are disabled,
don't post again. Man securettys. Install sshd.
Peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:31:21 -0000
In comp.os.linux.misc Clint Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi. I'm kinda new to inetd, but have been using variants of *nix for years.
|
| I installed RH7 from the RHL7 Bible book (workstation install with GNOME).
| Works fine. But, when I try to telnet to the system from another machine on
| my network, I can't. So, I did a port scan and found smtp, sun-rpc, spooler
| and motorola cable modem test ports open (25, 111, 515, and 1024). Seems
| kinda strange. No telnet (port 23).
|
| According to my boot dialog, inetd does start. But, there is nothing in my
| /etc/xinetd.d directory other than linuxconf-web, which again seems weird
| (no xinetd.conf files and no xinetd.conf on my system).
|
| This is a completely fresh RHL7 install. I did nothing to it but install and
| check for telnet services.
|
| What am I doing wrong? Was I suppose to do the server install?
|
| Any help will be appreciated. Since I'm having trouble with my machines, an
| email to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be appreciated.
|
| Sorry if this is the wrong group or a newbie or FAQ question. I searched for
| an answer but couldn't find any.
Welcome to the world of distributions run amok. Redhat was changing things
so much that I quit using it. While they were going for GUI based config
tools, they changed the format of the normal files, moved them around, or
worse, eliminated them, to the point that edit based config doesn't work.
Then the GUI tools don't do everything and left me hanging with no way to
do many of the things I did the "normal" way.
You're running into the same thing. Have a talk with yourself and find out
how you want to manage things on your own computer. Once you have that
figured out, then you can decide if Redhat is still right for you, or if
you want something that only another distribution or system can give you.
If you can't figure out what you do want, then I guess you have to try some
of the choices and see. But don't pay any attention to the people who say
you need to do things the same way everyone else does; there is no on thing
that everyone else does because as you can see there are lots of different
distributions, and they are different.
--
=================================================================
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ |
=================================================================
------------------------------
From: Rick Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 10 gig disk in a 500 meg BIOS
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:43:14 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick
Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Hard Disk Howto confusion]
After experimenting, here's what I found out:
}
}Does it matter that the BIOS in my Nec Versa E (circa 1992) can't
}handle a 10 gig drive if I am using Linux exclusively on the machine?
No.
}The way I read the howto, all I have to do is make a 5meg first
}partition as the root. Is this correct? If I make the first partition 5
}meg, will the installation system find another partition and use it if
}I mount the second partition with /root as the mount point?
I *still* dunno what the Howto meant, but I couldn't make this scheme
work.
}
}
}Need I even do all this if I am only using Linux?
No.
}Can I, in other
}words, make the first partition 5 gig and still expect the BIOS to find
}the master boot record in the first 1024 cylinders?
Yes.
Here was the problem: I couldn't get the Debian kernel and drivers to
install on my circa 1992 i486 notebook computer with 20 megs of ram and
impossible to upgrade BIOS. The Debian chicken-pecking-at-the-keyboard
installation program ran fine until it came time to install the kernel
and drivers. The installer would accept and read all the disks; the HD
access light would come on: I could *hear* the heads moving. But when
the installer flipped to the "checking the state of your system" prober
to determine what the next default step should be, it stayed at
"Install Kernel and Drivers." Repeating that step produced an error:
"error writing to temp file: Success." Which is about as cryptic as you
can get.
I suspected the HD was the culprit, because of its honking big size
compared to what the BIOS was prepared to handle. I flipped to some of
the alternate consoles and saw error messages about *being out of room*
to write suchandsuch a file.
Here's what I did to solve the problem:
I erased all the partitions on the disk; changed the units to cylinders
so I could get right up to 1024; made the first partition about 950
cylinders; changed units back to meg, made the swap about 40 meg; made
the rest one big partition. This was pretty much a stab in the dark
based on the Hard Disk Howto's mention of the 1024-cylinder problem.
The Debian Installer had no further problems with the kernal and
drivers, nor the base system.
Thanks to all who contributed.
--
Use reply-to address.
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: xinetd (telnet) problems with RHL7
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:48:49 +0100
In comp.os.linux.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.misc Clint Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome to the world of distributions run amok. Redhat was changing things
> so much that I quit using it. While they were going for GUI based config
> tools, they changed the format of the normal files, moved them around, or
> worse, eliminated them, to the point that edit based config doesn't work.
> Then the GUI tools don't do everything and left me hanging with no way to
> do many of the things I did the "normal" way.
Nice summary. I agree wholeheartedly with all that, of course! RH
indeed changed things so that it became easier for programs to mess with
the system, and harder by far for humans! Lots of different tiny little
config files is great for updaters and installers and package
managers, because they can't edit! But humans edit very well. So
RH made their distro hard for humans to manage .. sysadmins either
ripped out their guis or worked around them when necessary - rarely
could one work with them. Sigh.
> You're running into the same thing. Have a talk with yourself and find out
> how you want to manage things on your own computer. Once you have that
> figured out, then you can decide if Redhat is still right for you, or if
> you want something that only another distribution or system can give you.
> If you can't figure out what you do want, then I guess you have to try some
> of the choices and see. But don't pay any attention to the people who say
> you need to do things the same way everyone else does; there is no on thing
> that everyone else does because as you can see there are lots of different
> distributions, and they are different.
:-)
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.linux.networking,alt.os.linux,comp.dcom.net-management,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: MGEN
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 01:11:47 +0800
Hi all,
Has anyone tried Version 3.2a1 ??
http://manimac.itd.nrl.navy.mil/MGEN/
On linux kernel 2.2.17, i have this constant error when i run mgen or drec,
"ifconfig: unknown option -e"
apparently there's no such option in linux... i don't know what effect it
has...
Has anyone solved this problem or should i just ignore? I am not sure if the
performance or certain features are turned off because of this.
Regards.
------------------------------
From: Doug O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Scrambled mouse cursor in X11?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:25:06 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Some video cards have problems with the hardware mouse cursor at high
> dot clocks. My cirrus-based laptop for instance. The fix in my case
> was to put "Option sw_cursor" in the Device section of XF86Config.
> Maybe your card has a similar option.
Hey;
Thanks for the reply; that did the trick! I appreciate it!
Doug
--
===================
Douglas K. O'Leary
Senior System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:42:54 +0100
From: "P. Ekkebus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: outlook and ssl crash
Hi
I want to use pop3 with ssl and outlook email clients.
but everyting seems to fail
First of all I compiled the newest version of openssl
version openssl-0.9.6
then I compiled the latest version of UWimap with ssl support.
make options "make lnp SPECIALAUTHENTICATORS=ssl" and in the make
file the switch SSLTYPE=unix like they discribe in the
in theire document on
http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/SSLBUILD.html
In my /etc/inetd.conf I have added the pop3, spop3, imap and imaps
entry's
like in the document on
http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/SSLBUILD.html
pop-2 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/ipop2d ipop2d
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/ipop3d ipop3d
imap stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/imapd imapd
pop3s stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/ipop3d ipop3d
imaps stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/imapd imapd
Then I created the certificates.
/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl req -new -x509 -nodes -days 356 -out
imapd.pem
Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
...................++++++
.........................................++++++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
=====
You are about to be asked to enter information that will be
incorporated
into your certificate request.
What you are about to enter is what is called a Distinguished Name or a
DN.
There are quite a few fields but you can leave some blank
For some fields there will be a default value,
If you enter '.', the field will be left blank.
=====
Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:NL
State or Province Name (full name) [Some-State]:Zeeland
Locality Name (eg, city) []:Breskens
Organization Name (eg, company) [Internet Widgits Pty Ltd]:ekky.org
Organizational Unit Name (eg, section) []:ekky.org
Common Name (eg, YOUR name) []:grumpy.ekky.org
Email Address []:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I restart inet everything looks pretty good :-)
When I use netscape with imaps in Linux connect to my mailserver
everything works fine even outlook express and outlook 97 work fine
with imaps.
When I try to fetch my email using pop3s (using ssl), then the first
time everytinhg goes very well, but then outlook will hang and he will
not do it again.
A output of tcpdump:
[first time with succes]
# tcpdump port 995
tcpdump: listening on eth0
18:27:43.644817 pc11.ekky.org.1056 > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: R
981975:981975(0) win 0 (DF)
18:27:53.785761 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: S
7721675:7721675(0) win 8192 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
18:27:53.785872 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: S
3636984806:3636984806(0) ack 7721676 win 5840 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
(DF)
18:27:53.792153 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: . ack 1 win
8760 (DF)
18:27:55.328346 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 1:100(99)
ack 1 win 8760 (DF)
18:27:55.328465 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 100 win
5840 (DF)
18:27:55.333466 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1:1013(1012) ack 100 win 5840 (DF)
18:27:55.392417 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P
100:282(182) ack 1013 win 7748 (DF)
18:27:55.430048 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 282 win
6432 (DF)
18:27:55.453163 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1013:1056(43) ack 282 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.750058 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1013:1056(43) ack 282 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.751789 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: . ack 1056
win 7705 (DF)
18:27:55.751888 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1056:1125(69) ack 282 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.795765 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 282:314(32)
ack 1125 win 7636 (DF)
18:27:55.795844 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 314 win
6432 (DF)
18:27:55.796735 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1125:1187(62) ack 314 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.833336 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 314:349(35)
ack 1187 win 7574 (DF)
18:27:55.870065 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 349 win
6432 (DF)
18:27:55.910926 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1187:1238(51) ack 349 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.937371 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 349:376(27)
ack 1238 win 7523 (DF)
18:27:55.937476 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 376 win
6432 (DF)
18:27:55.938389 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1238:1268(30) ack 376 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.957220 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 376:403(27)
ack 1268 win 7493 (DF)
18:27:55.959466 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: P
1268:1303(35) ack 403 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.960692 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: F
1303:1303(0) ack 403 win 6432 (DF)
18:27:55.963225 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: . ack 1304
win 7458 (DF)
18:27:55.968414 pc11.ekky.org.nim > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: F 403:403(0)
ack 1304 win 7458 (DF)
18:27:55.968488 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.nim: . ack 404 win
6432 (DF)
[second time when outlook fails]
18:30:03.649028 pc11.ekky.org.1060 > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: S
7793917:7793917(0) win 8192 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
18:30:03.649137 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.1060: S
3753727654:3753727654(0) ack 7793918 win 5840 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
(DF)
18:30:03.653529 pc11.ekky.org.1060 > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: . ack 1 win
8760 (DF)
18:30:03.663379 pc11.ekky.org.1060 > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: P 1:97(96)
ack 1 win 8760 (DF)
18:30:03.663480 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.1060: . ack 97 win
5840 (DF)
18:30:03.704432 grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s > pc11.ekky.org.1060: P
1:1013(1012) ack 97 win 5840 (DF)
18:30:03.933250 pc11.ekky.org.1060 > grumpy.ekky.org.pop3s: . ack 1013
win 7748 (DF)
So can somebody please tell me what I'm doing wrong
thanks
Piet.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:38:34 +0100
From: "N. Emons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Watermark
Does anyone know of a tool that can make image watermarks for copyright
protection in Linux.
Digimarc makes professional tools, but they only work with windows based
programs.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Subject: Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:55:29 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:12:00 GMT in comp.os.linux.misc,
Jeff B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyone have an idea of what a process name enclosed in [] (i.e. square
>brackets) means on the output of a ps -ef command.
>O/S is RetHat 6.2 - command is: /bin/ps -ef
...
>Answer is worth a couple of bonus points in my Linux class for the
>first correct response.
>Any help will be greatly appreciated...
The answer *IS* in the man page.
--
William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~ /\
Y1.99K compliant message. ~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: "Valentin Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Suse 7.1 with 2.4 kernel: masquerading
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:06:48 GMT
Hi!
I have a problem with masquerading with my suse distripution. Ususally there
are some modules like ip_masq_ftp, but I don't have those modules. Does the
2.4 kernel not need those modules? How can I start masqerading? (the line:
ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -i eth0 works, but I have to load those missing
modules too)
And I'm not able to start masquerading with the Suse-firewall. When I'm
enabling the Firewall (START_FW=yes) my internet does not work any more
because linux doesn't find the network interface cards.
I thank you for your help.
valentin schwarz
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff B)
Subject: Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:24:28 GMT
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:55:29 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(William Burrow) wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:12:00 GMT in comp.os.linux.misc,
>Jeff B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Anyone have an idea of what a process name enclosed in [] (i.e. square
>>brackets) means on the output of a ps -ef command.
>>O/S is RetHat 6.2 - command is: /bin/ps -ef
>...
>>Answer is worth a couple of bonus points in my Linux class for the
>>first correct response.
>>Any help will be greatly appreciated...
>
>The answer *IS* in the man page.
Do you mean:
"Programs swapped out to disk will be shown without command line
arguments, and unless the c option is given, in brackets."
I took this to mean that the "c" option needed to be specified in
brackets...guess I was a bit too literal...
Thanks for giving me a different way to look at it.
>
>--
>William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
>Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~ /\
>Y1.99K compliant message. ~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Suse 7.1 with 2.4 kernel: masquerading
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:25:46 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this is not your question, but firewalling changed again with the 2.4 kernels.
I could not get the original SuSE 2.4 to work, but a downloaded 2.4.2 was fine.
I only have one NIC and no modem though - it is an intranet server.
Valentin Schwarz wrote:
> Hi!
> I have a problem with masquerading with my suse distripution. Ususally there
> are some modules like ip_masq_ftp, but I don't have those modules. Does the
> 2.4 kernel not need those modules? How can I start masqerading? (the line:
> ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -i eth0 works, but I have to load those missing
> modules too)
> And I'm not able to start masquerading with the Suse-firewall. When I'm
> enabling the Firewall (START_FW=yes) my internet does not work any more
> because linux doesn't find the network interface cards.
> I thank you for your help.
>
> valentin schwarz
--
Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect, especially on my
http://home.germany.net/101-69082/samba.html
Simple Samba Solutions web page
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: What is the [] in ps -ef output
Date: 17 Mar 2001 13:28:29 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William Burrow wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:12:00 GMT in comp.os.linux.misc,
> Jeff B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone have an idea of what a process name enclosed in [] (i.e. square
>> brackets) means on the output of a ps -ef command.
> The answer *IS* in the man page.
...although it really isn't correct for the (pseudo)processes
(kflushd, kupdate, kpiod, ...) cited by Jeff B.
--
Paul Kimoto
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text. Any images,
hyperlinks, or the like shown here have been added without my consent,
and may be a violation of international copyright law.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralph Spitzner)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: PPP dialer that handles dynamic one-time passwords?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:45:33 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Marley wrote:
>Our company has decided to implement strong authentication for dial-in
>access. They've issued us all with hardware tokens that generate a dynamic
>password when we enter our PIN. Obviously, I can't put a dynamic password
>into my chat script (can I?) so is there a ppp dialer that automates all
>the modem configuration and dialing bits, but propmts the user for username
>and password? I've look in FAQ's and HOWTO's but can't seem to find
>anything.
If it's just the username/password prompt you could use
the passprompt plugin for pppd2.3.11 unfortunately this
only does PAP, there are no chap hooks in the code, I belive.
-rasp
--
But, trust me on the sunscreen....
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
