Matthew Nuzum wrote: > I think so. I did use SMB in a smaller scale w/out any problems, > provided you have at least 2.2 of smbd. They really have made some > tremendous improvements, yet that 2.0 is still everywhere.
I've moved to 2.2.1a and 2.2.2. DFS and Win2K support is nice. There was a nice LDAP/Kerberos/SMB article in Sys Admin mag, December 2001. Good stuff. [ BTW, I was a contributing author on "Samba Unleashed" -- wrote Appendix A (Solaris), B (BSD) and Chapter 33 (Cross-Subnet Networking), mainly in a "last second" rush. ] > That may be a little extreme. But I guess it never > hurts to be safe. I personally have never run out of > inodes on a filesystem and that is the only concern I > can think of that is fixed by having DOSEMU on it's own > fs. Well, I wanted to limit the filesystem size to 2GB. -- Bryan -- Bryan J. Smith, Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
