Linux-Networking Digest #774, Volume #9 Mon, 4 Jan 99 08:13:38 EST
Contents:
Connecting via M$ Proxy Server/Firewall (Jaco =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?=)
eth0: Too much work at interrupt ("Bj�rn Dolkemeier")
Error # 11 ("Yura Tokarsky")
smbmount 2.0.0beta5 and linux 2.2.0pre4 ("John M. Flinchbaugh")
Re: Clear Netscape Cache (Andre Bossard)
Routing-problems with ZyXEL Omni TA 128 and PPP-2.3.X (Kolbjorn Bekkelund)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
("Crossbones")
Help with PPP to ISP via pppd (Michael Dobbins)
Re: Error # 11 ("Thomas Bendler")
Re: PPP (SImon Gibson)
Re: SAMBA... ("Thomas Bendler")
Re: What do I need for a network? ("Thomas Bendler")
routing has me stumped ("Neil Robinson")
Re: Sendmail Virus Scanning (Maurie Daly)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! (DG)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have (Richard Stevens)
Re: browsing a samba share in security=user (George Shaunfield)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jaco =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connecting via M$ Proxy Server/Firewall
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 12:57:02 +0200
Our company switched to an NT machine to serve as a gateway to the
internet.
I can communicate perfectly inside our internal network, as well as on
the external (when I'm wired up outside the gateway), but I cannot get
through the Micro$oft gateway...
I've been told that it is the MS system that refuses to let any other OS
through.. (dunno..)
Anybody know how to fool the NT system into letting my linux box speak
to the outside world?
Jaco
------------------------------
From: "Bj�rn Dolkemeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth0: Too much work at interrupt
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:51:13 +0100
Hello,
syslogd reports (message and warning): eth0: Too much work at interrupt
Can someone tell me about this warning (error?)
Bj�rn
------------------------------
From: "Yura Tokarsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Error # 11
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 13:08:23 +0200
When I installed Linux Red HAt 5.1 entered then my login-root,
password then startx and then I'm getting the message="cannot connect to X
server-caught signal 11".Maybe smbd knows what is the
problem
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 21074368
------------------------------
From: "John M. Flinchbaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smbmount 2.0.0beta5 and linux 2.2.0pre4
Date: 4 Jan 1999 09:15:48 GMT
--
____________________}John Flinchbaugh{______________________
| -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <- [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~
------------------------------
From: Andre Bossard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Clear Netscape Cache
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 10:36:46 +0000
> Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Cache -> Clear Disk Cache
>
> in NS 4.07 but it does not do the job. Why? Can I do it manually? How?
Hyo Arthur
You probably know that there are profiles for every user. The default
user is _default (i think). Search your user folder of netscape users
and change to the directory of the user (default: _default). In this
folder you will see a folder called 'cache' delete its content.
But there is also a history-file (Enter in Adress-field: about:global).
To delete this, simply delete the netscape.hst file in the netscape
directory.
------------------------------
From: Kolbjorn Bekkelund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Routing-problems with ZyXEL Omni TA 128 and PPP-2.3.X
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 22:57:50 +0000
Reply-To: Kolbjorn Bekkelund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am using a ZyXEL Omni TA128 for my ISDN ppp-dialup connection.
I do not have any ethernet cards or other local network interf.
I use it along with my Red Hat 5.2 powered Compaq Armada 1592, and with
ppp-2.2.0f. Yes, 2.2.0f, because anything newer, let`s say 2.3.5, let me
dial up OK,
get me logged in and assinged to an IP-adr., but then things starts to
go the wrong way:
I can not ping anything else than my dynam. assigned IP-adr. and my own
localhost.
Any pings to the outside world, including my ISP`s DNS leads to 100%
packet loss.
If I connect to my ISP via my analog USR Sportster 28800 with the same
setup (except for adj. in the modem init-string),
everything works just fine with ppp-2.3.x.
My routing table is OK for all the different setups. The only
significant difference to notice is that when I use "netstat -r"
it takes about a minute before it displays any results when I am using
ppp-2.3.x, but it displays promptly when ppp-2.2.0f
is used. It also resolves the remote IP-adr. and displays the name in
the table when "netstat -r" is used instead of the IP-adr.
which is the result with the same command when using ppp-2.3.x.
This was much info, but this problem prevents me from using other
kernels than 2.0.xx, because 2.1-kernels want deal
with ppp-2.2.x. Any clues here.
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LinuXSystemer DA
Org.nr. 979 933 304, Norway
http://www.linuxsystemer.no
Manager: Kolbj�rn Bekkelund
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. +47 77834947, mob. +47 90209856
Fax. +47 77836161
Red Hat Hardware Partner
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
From: "Crossbones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but
am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 11:51:13 GMT
First off... Great job on pissing a lot of people in this newsgroup off.
Way to go. Piss enough of them off and they might actually notice that they
can bitch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. And probably will.
Anyways, Since you're so damned impatient to install RH linux, you need to
do the following things: (And you WILL need to work at this a bit.. I'm not
going to source out all the damned directory trees for you and tell you
EXACTLY where everything is)
1) Ftp to one of RedHat's mirror ftp sites (I don't think they allow ftp to
them anymore.) If you need a mirror location, visit RedHat's site and find
one yourself.
2) Download the disk image files. There are three of them. (You only need
two to install, the third is a rescue disc. You'll probably need it in the
future.)
3) Use the utility you also downloaded (don't remember the filename and I
don't care.. I figured this stuff out on my own and you should be able to
also) and use it to make the floppys you'll need. (I believe the 3 images
are "boot" "supplimental" and "rescue" .. don't remember exactly)
4) Boot the "boot" disc and follow the instructions. You'll need some basic
stuff about your machine (Your i.p.#, dns #'s and stuff like that. Pull
those from windows before you reboot.)
If you have a cdrom burner, look for the Mandrake distribution.. You can
download the complete iso image and burn it to cd.. And it's based off RH
5.2 and has everything you need.
If you can't get it from here.. Tough.
Crossbones
DG wrote in message <368e9f4c.5246091@news>...
>Why don't you pay me $300 first and then I'll follow your crappy
>advice.
>
------------------------------
From: Michael Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with PPP to ISP via pppd
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 23:04:26 +1100
I've recently being trying to get my Linux box act as a dial manager for
my internet connection, and have run into some trouble when not using X.
X works fine, as does ifup ppp0, but when I try the following, I have
problems.
I'm using pppd (ie, pppd :10.0.0.2 to give it a 'fake' address and then
accept any that are given to me) to set up a connection (soon to be by
demand dialling, but at the moment, my version doesn't support it) via
the /etc/ppp/options file which contains:
debug
demand # I know this won't work, but this isn't the problem
idle 1800
ipcp-accept-remote
ipcp-accept-local
lock
noauth # I've also tried to comment this out
defaultroute
user ******* # This lines up with the first line in my
# pap-secrets file... Is this correct ??
remotename ozemail.com.au # presumably ok ??
/dev/ttyS0 57600 crtscts
connect '/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/call-isp'
My script called above is :
TIMEOUT 5
ABORT '\nBUSY\r'
ABORT '\nNO ANSWER\r'
ABORT '\nNO DIALTONE\r'
'' \rAT
'OK-+++\c-OK' ATH0
TIMEOUT 40
OK ATDT********
CONNECT ''
What my logfile is saying is: (apologies for any formatting problems)
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the
University of California
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux kernel: registered device ppp0
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux pppd[387]: demand dialling is not supported by
kernel driver version 2.2.0
Jan 4 22:17:01 linux pppd[391]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: timeout set to 5 seconds
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: abort on (\nNO DIALTONE\r)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: send (^MAT^M)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: expect (OK)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: ^MAT^M^M
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: OK
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: -- got it
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: send (ATH0^M)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: timeout set to 40 seconds
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: expect (OK)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: ^M
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: ATH0^M^M
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: OK
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: -- got it
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: send (ATDT********^M)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: expect (CONNECT)
Jan 4 22:17:03 linux chat[392]: ^M
Jan 4 22:17:28 linux chat[392]: ATDT********^M^M
Jan 4 22:17:28 linux pppd[391]: Serial connection established.
Jan 4 22:17:28 linux chat[392]: CONNECT
Jan 4 22:17:28 linux chat[392]: -- got it
Jan 4 22:17:28 linux chat[392]: send (^M)
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x94beab9e> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp> < 13 0c 01 4e 65 77 63 61
73 74 6c 65>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <auth pap> <
13 0c 01 4e 65 77 63 61 73 74 6c 65>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth pap>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x3 <auth pap>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x4 <auth pap>]
Jan 4 22:17:30 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:30 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x5 <auth pap>]
Jan 4 22:17:30 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:30 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x6 <auth pap>]
Jan 4 22:17:32 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x94beab9e> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 4 22:17:33 linux pppd[391]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jan 4 22:17:33 linux pppd[391]: Modem hangup
Jan 4 22:17:33 linux pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
>From this, I can see that I'm sending a few rejects back to the server,
but a few hours of reading and fiddling has not seemed to help any.
If anyone can give me any suggestions to try, or perhaps point me to
some helpful sites (ps: I got most of this info from
http://www.nic.com/~cannon/Linux for which I am grateful - it's got me
further than a whole lot of reading's ever got me -- thanks Kevin !!) I
would be __much__ appeciated !!
Thankyou in advance
Michael
a (rapidly) learning Linux lover
Still can't get used to that ' \ ' on my other computer
- much prefer the ' / ' on the 'real' one ;-)
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Error # 11
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 13:19:38 +0100
You normaly get this error message when the x-server configuration is
incorrect. So in most cases you installed the wrong x-server or you choose
wrong startparameters (first try out a small resoulution and color depth and
then slowly increase).
regards Thomas
Yura Tokarsky schrieb in Nachricht <76q7fl$s1s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>When I installed Linux Red HAt 5.1 entered then my login-root,
>password then startx and then I'm getting the message="cannot connect to X
>server-caught signal 11".Maybe smbd knows what is the
>problem
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>ICQ# 21074368
>
>
------------------------------
From: SImon Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 15:26:41 -0800
Looja Tuladhar wrote:
>
> I have this weird error when I use PPP to connect to my ISP (mindspring).
>
> The dialing works fine. The login goes fine. Right after the login works,
> the connection dies. Has anyone encountered this, know what might be
> happening?
>
> Same thing happens whether I use minicom or the netcfg control panel.
> Oh I'm running redhat 5.2 BTW.
>
> Looja Tuladhar Phone: 650-757-8605
> 850 Campus Dr #107 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Daly City, CA 94015 http://cs.stanford.edu/~looza
Make sure you have pppd2.3 (or the latest) I needed to recompile the
kernel and the new pppd It all worked well after that.
Simon
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SAMBA...
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 13:28:30 +0100
I think this is a problem with the rights of the user on a dos partion. As I
know the dos partion don't support unix attributes like rw or ro. So in this
case unix does a translation between the dos attributes and the unix
attributes. Try out something like forceuser=XXXX (see smb.conf man page) to
say samba that all access to this share will done by user xy.
regards Thomas
Maddog schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I just installed samba and i can browse the network... but im trying to
>access a dos partition that is mounted as dosdrive.. I can see the
>directory, but when i try to use it.. it says that "network access is
>denied" this is what i put in the smb.conf
>
>[dosdrive]
> comment = DOS partition
> path = /dosdrive
> ; location of Red Hat system partition you want to share
> public = yes
> writable = yes
> printable = no
>
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What do I need for a network?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 13:38:04 +0100
Hi Darcy,
the answer is simple and complex together. At the first point you has to
decide which applications should run on this network. So after this you can
say how much power your network need. If you just have to transfer a few
files from host A to host B you normaly choose a twisted pair network with a
8 Port Hub supporting 10Mbit/s. You can also use a BNC cable to connect the
computers, the disadvantage is that can not upgrade these type of network to
the next generation of fast ethernet. If you want to run a server wich
should export a x-server for complex graphical operations you should decide
a fast ethernet working with 100MBit/s. The cable is the same like the
twisted pair network with 10MBit/s. You only take other Hubs and ethernet
cards.
In fact I can tell you more about the requirements if you post a detailed
list of service you want to use in your network.
regards Thomas
Darcy Grexton schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm interested in setting up a small lan.. Probably 5 computers or less
with
>a T1 connection.. I need to know what type of equipment I need and which
>makes are best.
>
>Thanx
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Neil Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routing has me stumped
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 12:52:10 +0100
I have 2 network cards in the firewall machine. The first (eth0) is
connected to the internal 100MB network. The second (eth1) is connected to a
Cisco 2503 router via a crossover cable. The Cisco ethernet side has the
address 193.123.234.145. My IP network as provided by my IP is
193.123.234.144/24. The eth1 device is assigned 193.123.234.146. The eth0
device is assigned 192.168.2.60. The rest of the internal network is using
various addresses from the 192.168.2.0 net range. From the firewall machine
I can ping the 192 network and also the Cisco. From the internal network I
can also ping the eth1 card. Unfortunately, I can't ping the Cisco from the
internal network. I have set up the routing table using the route command,
but it doesn't appear that anything is being routed from the 192 network to
the 193 network other than to the single card on the firewall. I am at a
complete loss here, since it seems that this is the only problem left
standing in the way of everything working (at least until I start
configuring the packet filtering rules and the squid stuff ;-)
The routing table is show below:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
193.123.234.144 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 5
eth1
default 193.123.234.145 255.255.255.240 UG 0 0 0
eth1
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 6
eth0
loopnet * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 lo
Any help would be appreciated.
Ciao, Neil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Maurie Daly)
Subject: Re: Sendmail Virus Scanning
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 03:32:13 GMT
In article <76ku02$4ug$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Dani�l" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>From: "Dani�l" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Sendmail Virus Scanning
>Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 11:59:49 +0100
>Mark Kaplan wrote in message
>>Is there a product for Linux Sendmail that will scan incoming e-mail
>>attachments for common viruses (particularly word viruses) and either clean
>>them or force them into a separate directory?
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>As I heard, McAfee has such a product. But to be honest, I can't find
>anything about Linux on their site...
>Let me know if you find anything.
>Greetz,
> .~. "In A World Without Fences...
> /V\ ...Who Needs Gates?"
> // \\
>/( )\ Dani�l ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> ^^-^^
Macafees product is for NT / WIN95/98 only .
It doesnt mean however that you cant use it with linux , as it needs to run on
a separate machine anyway, and it simply intercepts any connections to port 25,
ie sendmail , scans the data for viruses and then forwards the scanned data to
the real SMTP server.
It requires that you are able to change your MX records to point to the virus
scanning machine.
They do have a free demo that runs for 30 days.
I have tried it with linux and it works OK.
It would be a hell of a lot nicer if sendmail would do the virus scanning
itself , but this would require a large virus database which would have to
supplied by someone for free, unlikely I guess.
Maurie Daly
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DG)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but
am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 12:59:38 GMT
Thanks for the help. That's all I needed to know.
On Mon, 04 Jan 1999 11:51:13 GMT, "Crossbones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> First off... Great job on pissing a lot of people in this newsgroup off.
>Way to go. Piss enough of them off and they might actually notice that they
>can bitch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. And probably will.
>
> Anyways, Since you're so damned impatient to install RH linux, you need to
>do the following things: (And you WILL need to work at this a bit.. I'm not
>going to source out all the damned directory trees for you and tell you
>EXACTLY where everything is)
>
>1) Ftp to one of RedHat's mirror ftp sites (I don't think they allow ftp to
>them anymore.) If you need a mirror location, visit RedHat's site and find
>one yourself.
>2) Download the disk image files. There are three of them. (You only need
>two to install, the third is a rescue disc. You'll probably need it in the
>future.)
>3) Use the utility you also downloaded (don't remember the filename and I
>don't care.. I figured this stuff out on my own and you should be able to
>also) and use it to make the floppys you'll need. (I believe the 3 images
>are "boot" "supplimental" and "rescue" .. don't remember exactly)
>4) Boot the "boot" disc and follow the instructions. You'll need some basic
>stuff about your machine (Your i.p.#, dns #'s and stuff like that. Pull
>those from windows before you reboot.)
>
> If you have a cdrom burner, look for the Mandrake distribution.. You can
>download the complete iso image and burn it to cd.. And it's based off RH
>5.2 and has everything you need.
>
> If you can't get it from here.. Tough.
>
>Crossbones
>
>DG wrote in message <368e9f4c.5246091@news>...
>>Why don't you pay me $300 first and then I'll follow your crappy
>>advice.
>>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Richard Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 01:21:08 +0000
Go to a store and buy a redhat Distribution CD for a few bucks!
That shuould help
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 03:23:00 -0600
From: George Shaunfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: browsing a samba share in security=user
I got the same message from an NT Workstation machine after switching
Samba to security=user. The problem was that NT was trying to use
encrypted password (it never asked for the logon). The solution that I
used was to edit the Registry and tell it to enable plain text password.
In this folder of the registry:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\system\CurrentControlSet\Services\rdr\parameters\
add this DWord entry:
EnablePlainTextPassword: 1
I understand another approach might be to tell Samba to use encrypted
passwords. Maybe someone else can provide the details on this.
George Shaunfield
AccounTron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> When attempting to browse a samba share in security=user, I get
>
> "This user is not authorized to logon from this station."
>
> Anyone have any ideas why? Browsing works perfectly in security=share.
> I have a legitimate guest account.
>
> Herry
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
