Linux-Networking Digest #820, Volume #9 Fri, 8 Jan 99 22:13:59 EST
Contents:
3Com 3c589 Ethernet Card Redhat Linux 5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
HELP!! ADSL & @Home Cable on one Machine!! (Shaun Brown)
Re: sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?) (Dale Miracle)
Re: No network ? (Wisquatuk)
Sendmail problems "Returned Mail: User Unknown" ("Michael Torres")
sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?) ("Tom Shealy")
Re: TCP wrappers busted my mountd? (Stuart R. Fuller)
Re: Help! Ethernet problem!!! (Dean Darlison)
Re: how to install pop3 server into linux ? ("Thomas Bendler")
Re: Specialix Card (Zhang Sida)
Dial up ("Blake Frantz")
Re: SMB RedHat install problem ("Thomas Bendler")
SMTP /sendmail problem (Holy One)
Re: PPP in RH 5.2 - "ifup ppp0" ??? (ppp0 netmask woes) ("logik")
Re: ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ??? (Jon Barnett)
Hot to setup POP3 on RedHat 5,2 ? (alpha_dec)
Re: Problem with IP Aliasing ("Wizard")
Re: ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ??? (Jon Barnett)
Re: win-98 > FTP > Linux rh 5.1 (Athan)
Re: PLEASE DON'T REPLY: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ("d4d")
SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument ("Brian D. Cook")
Re: routing problem? - help needed (Clifford Kite)
proxy server (Vinod Krishna Bhat)
Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! ("grilla")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3Com 3c589 Ethernet Card Redhat Linux 5.2
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 22:56:14 GMT
I am having problems getting my 3Com 3c589 Etherlink card to work under
Redhat Linux 5.2
I get the following /var/log/messages:
excuting: './network start eth0'
+ usage: ifup <device name>
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gavin
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaun Brown)
Subject: HELP!! ADSL & @Home Cable on one Machine!!
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 00:56:55 GMT
I am trying to do the following
All regular trafic on adsl line
ftpd on @home Cable line
Problem 1.. only one routing table
Problem 2.. @home uses dhcp.. so my ip changes (although P 1
is my main concern)
any ideas how i can set this up??
i don't wanna have to set up a second
machine just for cable.
Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance!
------------------------------
From: Dale Miracle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?)
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 18:17:36 -0500
Tom Shealy wrote:
>
> Is there any way to build a network where the server and clients all plug
> into the same hub (and where the cablemodem plugs into the uplink port on
> that hub?)
>
> I was wondering because I only have one ethernet card in the server
> computer. (I don't want to buy another because the server is a nubus-based
> ppc macintosh running mklinux and i've found old apple peripherals to be
> overpriced and hard to find...esp for nubus architecture) Still, I'd rather
> use the mklinux box as a server than i would my pentium because I dual-boot
> the pentium, but don't use the mac for anything.
>
> I was hoping there might be a way to make the clients look for the
> particular MAC address of the server, and then configure the server normally
> with the cable-modem. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> -Tom
I know you can hook a hub to a cable modem and then connect the pc's off
of the hub. My friend did that and I found that you had to connect the
cable modem to the hub using the uplink port with a standard ethernet
cable (cat3 or cat5). We were having a problem getting the os/pc light
to light up on the cable modem, once I used the uplink port it worked
fine.
--
Dale Miracle "No matter where you go, there you are",
System Administrator Oliver's Law of Location
The Edge of Insanity "Real funny Scotty, now beam down my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clothes"
"I've gone to look for my self, if I return before I get
back keep me here."
------------------------------
From: Wisquatuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: No network ?
Date: 9 Jan 1999 01:23:24 GMT
Lorenzo Delloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have connected my PC with linux that has a NE2000 Netcard as eth0
> on IRQ3 0x300, with the address 172.16.0.1, my labtop (win98) with a
> 3com Etherlink III PCMCIA (3C589D) IP 172.16.0.10. Nevetheless the
> green light does not light, and when I ping the Linux for Linux it
> works, the labtop for Labtop too,
Yes, this makes sense, and it means that your interfaces are indeed
set up properly...
> but when I ping the labtop from the Linux I get the message that
> there is no network,
You mean 'network is unreachable'? I'm guessing we're dealing with a
routing problem, then. Type in 'route -n' on the Linux box. You
should get something like this:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
172.16.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 14 lo
The second one may or may not exist, depending on your kernel version,
but the first is the one we're concerned about. If you don't see
that, then what's happening is that the Linux box doesn't know where
to send signals destined for 172.16.0.0, and thus, that network is not
reachable.
The solution? Well, if it *is* this problem (which it might not be),
try entering this (as root):
/sbin/route add -net 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
That should set it up. Good luck!
--
Wisquatuk (myname[1..4]@netrover.com to e-mail)
------------------------------
From: "Michael Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sendmail problems "Returned Mail: User Unknown"
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 01:30:26 GMT
I'm using R H 5.2... I can send messages out but when someone tries to send
me a EMail the sender gets header stating "Retured Mail: User Unknown" with
this message:
The original message was received at Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:44:56 -0500 (EST)
from [216.76.106.20]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.company.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 551 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... we do not relay
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
How can I correct this error...
------------------------------
From: "Tom Shealy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 00:14:19 -0800
Is there any way to build a network where the server and clients all plug
into the same hub (and where the cablemodem plugs into the uplink port on
that hub?)
I was wondering because I only have one ethernet card in the server
computer. (I don't want to buy another because the server is a nubus-based
ppc macintosh running mklinux and i've found old apple peripherals to be
overpriced and hard to find...esp for nubus architecture) Still, I'd rather
use the mklinux box as a server than i would my pentium because I dual-boot
the pentium, but don't use the mac for anything.
I was hoping there might be a way to make the clients look for the
particular MAC address of the server, and then configure the server normally
with the cable-modem. Any ideas?
Thanks,
-Tom
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Subject: Re: TCP wrappers busted my mountd?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 11:00:04 GMT
David J. Topper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hey folks,
:
: I just set up a MOSTLY CLOSED tcp wrapper schema. Now my machines can't
: mount? But I thought mountd had nothing to do with wrappers. Besides
: that, I have all the machines that need to talk to each other defined in
: /etc/hosts.allow.
:
: I CAN telnet between all the machines.
Is mountd listed in /etc/inetd.conf? If not, then I don't think your
tcp-wrappers setup has caused this problem.
Check your /var/log/messages file for relevant information.
If you still can't find the problem, post more information, such as:
- which distribution you have, including version number and installed
updates.
- the contents of your /etc/hosts.allow and .deny files.
- whether mountd is mentioned in your /etc/inetd.conf file, or if
mountd is started at boot time.
- relevant information from your /var/log/messages file.
- error message(s) when you try to mount a NFS.
Stu
------------------------------
From: Dean Darlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! Ethernet problem!!!
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 08:12:55 +0000
"Kyle J. Lee" wrote:
> I have installed Inter EtherExpress PCI nic in my system (redhat 5.0)
> When the system boots up everything seems normal.
> the card is recognized without a problem.
> when i type ifconfig, i get lo and eth0 listings.
> but, when i try to ping other machines in our lan, it fails.
> using netcfg, i entered correct dns information, domain name, default
> gateway, etc.
> i cannot think of anything that may be causing this problem.
> please help me!!!!
>
> Kyle
output of 'ifconfig eth0' OK ?
Setup up /etc/resolv.conf OK ?
Cheers,
Dean.
--
Dean.A.Darlison
Dasco Ltd.
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to install pop3 server into linux ?
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:16:26 +0100
normally just enable the pop3 in the inetd.conf (pop3 stream tcp nowait root
/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/popper -s (suse5.3)). Make sure its always included
in services.
regards Thomas
alpha_dec schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>how to install pop3 server into linux ?
------------------------------
From: Zhang Sida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Specialix Card
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:26:13 +0800
I am use this card now, the driver included in Kernel and a script can makenod
for you, I use it about 3-4 month, haven't any problem.
In kernel source
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/specialix.txt
have detail
--
Sida
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Sir: I am a newcomer of Linux. My Boss tells me to build a ppp Server. I
> am preparing to use intelligent cards. Someone told me that Specilaix cards
> IO8+ was a perfect one. I would like to know more about this card, but I do
> not want a sales from Speciaix disturb me. Has anyone ever used this card?
> Could you give me some advice and detailed materials on such cards? Thanks
> for your help.
>
> Zhang Lei
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Blake Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dial up
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 02:16:58 -0600
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
I just installed linux redhat 5.1 and I cannot connect ot my ISP
through X or the command line unless I use minicom. I have used DIP
but to no avail, can someone help me configure my PPP and or SLIP?
Any help would be most appreciated. Reply in email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blake
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: PGP 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBNpW++u6HjJV7P5U/EQJo8gCfX19WQXRm/SKMkjXj+BId8gPDjGkAoLoq
BVm/NpH3H14rsoCt05wWNAur
=Bs8Q
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMB RedHat install problem
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:25:08 +0100
Did I understand your problem right? You try to install Linux from CD wich
is shared by a Windows95 box. If you try this, forget it, this won't work.
The Win95 supports only smb to share the cd-rom, not tcp/ip. Win95 uses
tcp/ip only to connect tcp/ip based services.
regards Thomas
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to install RedHat 5.1 from a W95 shared CDROM. The Linux
box is a
>>> 486 with an NE2000 clone. I believe that I am failing to set something
up in
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Holy One)
Subject: SMTP /sendmail problem
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 01:47:22 GMT
Things are progressing well on my new linux server. I now have email
set up and all goes well for email the originates form the outside
world and for email being sent "in-house". However, when I try to
send an email that is addressed to someone who is not a local user I
get this message:
� No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.
What is this? The other services I have tried: telnet, ftp, and http
all work fine went travelling to an outside destination. Why would
sendmail have this problem?
------------------------------
From: "logik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP in RH 5.2 - "ifup ppp0" ??? (ppp0 netmask woes)
Date: 9 Jan 1999 01:56:55 GMT
I have the very same problems with my linux box/rh5.2: i get connected, but
i get something like a
CCTP timeout request after getting my dynamic IP (some time between both
operations), and i am
unable to ping anyone... all routing&if are correct... i get tired of this
since i dont know where the configuration problem is...
I don't like Redhat for this BTW (Slakware's not dead). Note that i could
connect a few weeks ago with slackware, and since i use Win95 :(
thanks for help
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Barnett)
Subject: Re: ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ???
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 03:23:42 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris) wrote:
> I finally changes to SOCKS V5.
>ICQ is working, but RealPlayer and IRC won�t work.
RealPlayer and IRC do not support SOCKS directly. You will need to SOCKSify
them.
You may want to try the runsocks method as described at the
http://www.socks.nec.com/how2socksify.html page. This requires that you use
the shared library (ELF) versions of IRC and RealPlayer. You will also need
to have the SOCKS shared library (libsocks5_sh.so) and the runsocks script on
each client Linux system (created when you build the SOCKS5 distribution).
Follow the instructions on setting up the environment for runsocks (explained
in the man page - also found online at the www.socks.nec.com site; there is a
link off the how2socksify.html page).
When configuring RealPlayer for Netscape, you will need to ensure that you run
the SOCKSified application (where the RealPlayer configuration instructions
talk about '/home/foobar/rvplayer5.0/rvplayer %s' you'll want to subsitute
'/usr/local/bin/runsocks /home/foobar/rvplayer5.0/rvplayer %s' as per the
runsocks instructions for SOCKSifying applications).
I would imagine that you will need to follow the same sort of procedure for
IRC.
Note: I haven't tried this yet, as my experimental/development Linux system is
currently in a broken state (due to an unfortunate CORBA accident on my part).
Good luck.
JonB.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alpha_dec)
Subject: Hot to setup POP3 on RedHat 5,2 ?
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 08:58:37 GMT
Hot to setup POP3 on RedHat 5,2 ?
------------------------------
From: "Wizard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with IP Aliasing
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:58:16 +0100
Try:
#
# ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
# route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
#
# ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
# route add -net 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0:0
#
To delete an alias you simply add a `-' to the end of its name and refer to
it and is as simple as:
# ifconfig eth0:0- 0
Peter R�egg schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to run IP-Aliasing, running a NE2000 comatible card under
>Kernel 2.0.36.
>
>I _did_ compile Network Aliasing as well as IP Aliasing into the Kernel.
>
>Still, using ifconfig I get the following error:
>
>rzh1wln001:~# ifconfig eth0:0 193.193.142.130
>net_alias_dev_create(eth0:0): unregistered family==2
>SIOCSIFADDR: Invalid Argument
>
>Has anybody an Idea what I'm doing wrong?
>
>Thanks,
>
> Peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Barnett)
Subject: Re: ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ???
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 09:54:35 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Chris) wrote:
>Hi,
>who can tell me how to use IRC, ICQ an RealPlayer behind my Firewall ?
>I hered that I have to open a proxy connection, but I�m not sure if that
>is correct.
>My firewall uses the dual-homed host version of SOCKS 4.2b.
>It�s runing on a SuSE Linux System.
>
If the client is Win95/Win98/WinNT, then you can download Hummingbird's SOCKS
Client V5 software. This is the best solution, since once configured, it will
intercept TCP/IP communications from your Windows machine, and redirect as
required to the SOCKS server. The instructions on how to configure this are
essentially: if the packet is meant for a destination on the internal network,
then don't go to the SOCKS server, otherwise send the packet to the SOCKS
server. The SOCKS client supports SOCKS V4 or SOCKS V5.
You can download the software from www.hummingbird.com. The FAQ and
installation instructions are also there.
The SOCKS server may need to be configured to accept SOCKS requests from your
client machine. Speak to your system administrator regarding this.
Good luck.
JonB.
------------------------------
From: Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: win-98 > FTP > Linux rh 5.1
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 10:10:45 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
Athan
greyman wrote:
> You need to allow ftp access.
>
> If you are using the inetd superserver, then check the /etc/hosts.allow and
> /etc/hosts.deny files. In these you can specify things like:
>
> in.telnetd: 203.46.81.128/255.255.255.192
> in.ftpd: ALL
>
> ALL: 203.46.81.128/255.255.255.192
> ALL: ALL
>
> Otherwise, you also need to set the /etc/ftp* files.
> /etc/ftpusers - usernames that are not allowed to login
> /etc/ftphosts - access rules for hosts attempting to login
> /etc/ftpaccess - rules about what can be done.
>
> These are the main two. Check out the man pages for ftpaccess, ftphosts for
> more detail.
>
> Greyman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Athan wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I can telnet to my box for telnet only with a user name
> >different then root but I can't ftp to the linux box
> >
> >C:\>ftp
> >ftp> open
> >To X.100.100.2
> >Connected to X.100.100.2.
> >Connection closed by remote host.
> >ftp> open
> >To X.100.100.2
> >Connected to X.100.100.2.
> >Connection closed by remote host.
> >ftp>
> >
> >What should I change ??
> >
> >Thank you
> >Athan
> >PS i have added my win98 box in /etc/hosts
> >
------------------------------
From: "d4d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE DON'T REPLY: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 20:36:19 -0600
this jerk is obviously just a troll. ignore him and he will go away...
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] slobbered on his keyboard and some how typed:
<>> >>> >> Windows 98 on one hard disk. However, since it is 7.5 GB and it's
>> >>> >> 32-bit, Linux won't recognize it when I first install Linux...
>> <snip>
>> >>> >
snip
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >
>
>PLEASE DON'T REPLY !!!
>
------------------------------
From: "Brian D. Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 21:50:34 -0500
==============C9C8DF7CBD3BFA185CD626C3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have a dual 133 linux box. It's got two nic's in it, both are
3c905b-tx's. When I boot, I get this error, SIOCADDRT: Invalid
Argument. We are getting a frame relay connection in another week. I
wanted to get all the proxy/firewalling issues done before the line gets
installed. I'm trying to connect to my ISP via modem. I can dial in
(via dip) make the connection, but cannot resolve any names, or connect
to anything. This is a the same machine that I use at home (sans one
nic) I cannot figure out what else it could be. One nic is a
192.168.1.1 IP and the other is a 192.168.2.1 IP. they both work, and
can ping other machines on the network of about 10 people. Samba is
running on this machine, as well as a pop3/smtp server. I am running
RedHat 2.0.36, with all the necessary items for diald as well. (slip &
other packages)
Any Suggestions would be appreciated.
Brian D. Cook
Web Space Administrator
Greer Toyota-Subaru
Wappingers Falls, NY
==============C9C8DF7CBD3BFA185CD626C3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
I have a dual 133 linux box. It's got two nic's in it, both are
3c905b-tx's.
When I boot, I get this error, SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument. We are
getting a frame relay connection in another week. I wanted to get
all the proxy/firewalling issues done before the line gets installed.
I'm trying to connect to my ISP via modem. I can dial in (via dip)
make the connection, but cannot resolve any names, or connect to anything.
This is a the same machine that I use at home (sans one nic) I cannot figure
out what else it could be. One nic is a 192.168.1.1 IP and the other
is a 192.168.2.1 IP. they both work, and can ping other machines
on the network of about 10 people. Samba is running on this machine,
as well as a pop3/smtp server. I am running RedHat 2.0.36, with all
the necessary items for diald as well. (slip & other packages)
<P>Any Suggestions would be appreciated.
<P><A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Brian D. Cook</A>
<BR>Web Space Administrator
<BR><A HREF="http://www.greertoyota.com">Greer Toyota-Subaru</A>
<BR>Wappingers Falls, NY</HTML>
==============C9C8DF7CBD3BFA185CD626C3==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: routing problem? - help needed
Date: 8 Jan 1999 20:12:40 -0600
me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I don�t know if this a routing problem or something else.
: I had a working network setup using diald and ppp. Recently I have upgraded
: my machine, new hard disk, mother
: board and modem and since then my network connection with my ISP has not
: worked fully. I put the new modem in the same place as the old one (i.e.
: same com port and DMA) and a move the location of Linux around from one
DMA hasn't anything to do with modems, although IRQ does.
: disk to another.
: The problem is this: I can�t get any web or email connection. I have a
: ppp-on script that uses chat and that works OK. I can start it up with
: ppp-on and ping my ISP but Netscape complain �no such domain� whenever I
: enter any web address. Other applications also give errors like �unknown
: host� and fetchmail gives �connecting to host: Connection refused�. I get
: the error message instantly like it did not even attempt to connect to my
: ISP even if the ppp link is up. Diald gives no error messages and tcpdump
: show that the only network activity is on lo nothing on the default slip
: interface for diald.
I don't know much about diald but have comments anyway :-) what else is new?
: I�ve checked the network files a number of times and can see not obvious
: errors. This is to me a bit odd as all the files are the same as they were
: when it all worked before I upgraded. Somewhere along the lines I must have
: failed to copy something or altered something but I can�t see what. In some
: ways it sounds to me like there is no default route set up but route says
: there is or something else is wrong with the routing. I include some of the
: results from ifconfig and netstat if that helps:
: netstat -i
: Kernel Interface table
: Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR
: Flags
: lo 3584 0 173 0 0 0 173 0 0 0
: BLRU
: eth0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 BRU
: sl0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRU
: route
: Kernel IP routing table
: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
: Iface
: 194.213.74.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 0 sl0
: MyDomain * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4 eth0
: loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 lo
: default * 0.0.0.0 U 1 0 0 sl0
This looks like a slip connection with everything OK. So do the others,
assuming MyDomain is 191.168.0.0 .
: ldconfig
? ifconfig ?
: lo Link encap:Local Loopback
: inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
: UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
: RX packets:174 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
: TX packets:174 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
: eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:8C:DF:31:B5
: inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
: UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
: RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
: TX packets:39 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
: Interrupt:5 Base address:0x210
: sl0 Link encap:Serial Line IP
: inet addr:192.168.0.1 P-t-P:194.213.74.1 Mask:0.0.0.0
: UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
: RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
: TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
This looks OK for a slip route. So do the others.
: The Ethernet interface is a 3Com Ethernet card. It has been in my machine
: for a while but I haven�t finished building a second computer for it to
: talk to. It was there when my network was working.
: The host file is setup with the localhost and my machine and domain. The
: host.conf file just has order hosts in it.
The host.conf file should have "order hosts, bind" perhaps followed by the
line "multi on".
I don't know any man pages for this but it should be in the NAG.
There is also the /etc/resolv.conf which should have nameservers specified
with entries like
domain yourisp.com
( or search yourisp.com works too. )
nameserver xxx.xx.xxx.xx
nameserver yyy.yyy.yy.y
"man 5 resolver" for more about resolv.conf
There is /etc/hosts
where you can put often used IPs with their FQDNs for quick lookup.
"man 5 hosts" for more.
: I have nag and the normal HOWTOs but they have not been of much help. Most
: of the problems I have had with Linux I have fixed my self but this one I
: am at a bit of a loss. Any help appreciated.
If none of this brings joy then I would make sure the ppp negotiation
messages don't show anything funny. These are ordinarily found in
/etc/log/debug for pppd after adding the debug option - diald may do
something else.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: Vinod Krishna Bhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proxy server
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:17:46 GMT
Hi!
Can someone give me some good ideas to build a personal proxy server?
thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: "grilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!!
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 07:37:55 -0600
And how is your Rambler these days?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>FTP INSTALL FINALLY WORKED THANKS TO CROSSBONES !!!
>Well, except for me and Crossbones, all of you are none more than
>f****** idiots. But it's been fun insulting everyone one of you, who
>were against me, in this newsgroup. In fact, when you look at the
>thread(s), it probably reminds you of Jerry Springer. Now I did not ask
>for this, you all forced me into it, so don't even f****** blame me !!!
>Anyway, it was fun fighting like in the Springer shows but I gotta go
>now, so
>GOOD-BYE TO ALL YOU MENTALLY RETARDED IDIOTS OUT THERE WHO CAN'T BE HELPFUL
THE WAY I WANT IT !!!
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
