Linux-Networking Digest #828, Volume #9 Sat, 9 Jan 99 15:13:42 EST
Contents:
Re: free X server on Windows 95 (Ted Potter)
Linux proxy question!!! ("Barton Hodges (MindPhlux)")
watch the traffic ?? ("T.Lauter")
Re: security (Brian McCauley)
Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Michael Powe)
Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Michael Powe)
Re: Smbmount error (root)
in.ftpd (PhilBurt)
Newbie question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems) ("Henning Ahlers")
Re: Internet via MS Proxy/Firewall? (Kaz Morishita)
Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems) (Markus Sicheneder)
Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems) (Rob van der Putten)
named.boot & hosts files - are these correct use of (Mark Worsdall)
Re: Redhat 5.1 and NT Server 4.0 Can't see each other (David Barnes)
FTP & Root access (Jordy Leduc)
Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows (David Steuber)
Proxy on Proxy ("wkchiu")
Need driver for Netgear FA310TX NIC (Art Mollet)
Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Michael Powe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 10:50:11 -0800
From: Ted Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: free X server on Windows 95
http://www.starnet.com
I agree that the other products use a window to display the xsession which is a bit
of a drag. However check out
vnc - it is free. Also I was unable to get the other products to work with applix,
vnc does without a hitch. I can
not afford the $200.00 per seat xwin wants.
Mark Worsdall wrote:
> In article <764vtp$htr$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pules <pules@NOFUCKINGSPAMdir
> ect.a2000.nl> writes
> >
> >X-win Pro works nicely. no shit with missing fonts etc.
> >Also. it doesn't hide your desktop behind a big fat blue screen, but opens
> >x-terms or even netscapes (nonsense, of course, but nice to try) as windows,
> >so you can browse a man page with internet exploder and work in x at the
> >same time.
> >Unfortunately, it only works for half an hour at a time as it is shareware.
> >You can start it up again, though.
> >(If anyone cares to share a key ;) )
> >
> >
> Any URL for X-win Pro
>
> --
> Work:- postmasterAThinwick.demon.co.uk WEB:- http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
> Work:- mworsdallATshaftesburysoc.org.uk REPLACE AT with @
> Home:- hinwickATworsdall.demon.co.uk WEB:- http://www.worsdall.demon.co.uk
> SiteSight:- sitsightATshadow.org.uk WEB:- http://www.shadow.org.uk/SiteSight
> Shadow:- webmasterATshadow.org.uk WEB:- http://www.shadow.org.uk
------------------------------
From: "Barton Hodges (MindPhlux)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux proxy question!!!
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 13:54:12 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, I recently got my linux box up, and am running it as a proxy server
for my house. It works fine with Netscape (from my 95 machine) and
general apps. I am using Socks5 for my server, and Aventail AUTOsocks
for my "transperent" client. The one problem I have, is that I can not
play games! I don't have a firewall up, so thats not the problem. Anyone
else have this problem? Are there other transperent proxy softwares
that I could use? If I can't play games... are there any other descent
proxy packages I could use? I have a few 95 machines, and a NT4 machine
on my network.
Thanks,
Barton
------------------------------
From: "T.Lauter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: watch the traffic ??
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 19:44:33 +0100
How can the entire traffic of a linux-webserver be recorded?
That should happen for each single user.
It leisures also accesses of outsides is considered.
Each access over HTTP, FTP, POP, SMTP should become grasp. (in and out)
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: security
Date: 03 Jan 1999 12:24:01 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I noticed that my hard drive was working like crazy and xload's
> graphical chart was maxed out. I launched TOP, and saw that FIND was using
> almost all resources, then SORT kicked in using most resources.
man updatebd
> I use NETKBD
> to monitor modem send/receive (blinking keyboard cap lock & scroll lock LED's
> instead of an external modem's LED's), and they indicated data send/receive
> even though the web page and all graphics were loaded that I was
> viewing.
updatedb does not account for this.
> Do I have anything to worry about?
Maybe. The network traffic may be cause for suspicion. The disk
activity was probably updatedb.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Michael Powe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 08 Jan 1999 22:18:29 -0800
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> Your belief that all mail servers are configured to require
Jeff> a correct return address is groundless. Most of the spam not
Jeff> generated by 'throwaway accounts' is sent through mail
Jeff> servers that have not been configured properly.
No, not all servers are correctly configured. But the trend is toward
an increasing number that are -- largely because of the work of people
who are <really> fighting spam.
mp
8<---------------how-easy-is-it-to-demunge-an-address?------------------->8
#! /usr/bin/perl # if you are [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Another Luser):
while ($line = <>){ if ($line =~ m/^\s*$/ ){ last; }
if ($line =~ m/^From: (\S+) \(([^()]*)\)/){ $from_address = $1; } }
if ($from_address =~ m/\S+NOSPAM\S+/){ $x = index($from_address, NOSPAM);
substr($from_address, $x, 6+1) = ""; printf("The real address is %s\n",
$from_address);}else { printf("No munge, just plain %s\n",$from_address);}
printf("\nBrought to you by the Truth In Mail Headers Foundation\n");
8<-----------------------here's-one-example------------------------------>8
- --
Michael Powe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trollope.org
Portland, Oregon USA
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: GnuPG v0.9.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encrypted with Mailcrypt 3.5.1 and GNU Privacy Guard
iD8DBQE2lvSU755rgEMD+T8RAgu1AJwK+cUF8JpdfZT6HFUWU/ne62ZAbQCfclLx
IPGjImKRbTcfd8ihxk48DWY=
=g116
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: Michael Powe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 08 Jan 1999 22:13:08 -0800
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "William" == William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> On 9 Jan 1999 02:06:50 GMT, Wisquatuk
William> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William> Well, another idea that occurs to me is this. The ISP
William> provides users with two email IDs. One for general email
William> use, the second for use with USENET messages as a valid
William> reply address. The client software is somehow smart
William> enough to know that one of the email address is
William> exclusively for replies from USENET.
You already can do this with `plus' addressing. See my address above?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- if I have a need, I can sort on that
plus. Plus addressing is legal and effective, providing you're
willing to do the work necessary to sort.
mp
8<---------------how-easy-is-it-to-demunge-an-address?------------------->8
#! /usr/bin/perl # if you are [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Another Luser):
while ($line = <>){ if ($line =~ m/^\s*$/ ){ last; }
if ($line =~ m/^From: (\S+) \(([^()]*)\)/){ $from_address = $1; } }
if ($from_address =~ m/\S+NOSPAM\S+/){ $x = index($from_address, NOSPAM);
substr($from_address, $x, 6+1) = ""; printf("The real address is %s\n",
$from_address);}else { printf("No munge, just plain %s\n",$from_address);}
printf("\nBrought to you by the Truth In Mail Headers Foundation\n");
8<-----------------------here's-one-example------------------------------>8
- --
Michael Powe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trollope.org
Portland, Oregon USA
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: GnuPG v0.9.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encrypted with Mailcrypt 3.5.1 and GNU Privacy Guard
iD8DBQE2lvM/755rgEMD+T8RAmcRAJ9/LhuSU8dRFvKWsxWNs2OM+RXyFQCgvXxy
upe/9v7slBCREnZYoT0/HR0=
=4kci
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Smbmount error
Date: 08 Jan 1999 23:55:37 +0100
"ACE Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> I have now recompiled my kernel to 2.1.131 and included the smb filesystem
> in the kernel! When i now tries to use smbmount i get this error!
>
> Smb need mount ver 6
> mount error: invalid argument
> Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reason.
>
> Heh, it worked just fine before! Im using redhat 5.2 now! Got the same error
> on redhat 5.1!
smbmount doesn't work with 2.1.xxx kernels.
You must upgrade to samba-2.0.0beta5 (or more) and compile it against
2.1.xxx
headers.
So you must do a :
./configure --with-smbmount
make
and it will produce appropriate the smbmount, smbmnt etc. files.
Then, smbmount "\\SERVNAME\name_of_share" -c "mount /mnt/smbfs" (or
whatever)
I myself made an rpm out of samba-2.0.0beta5 in order to have the files
put in the proper places (insted of /usr/local). If you need help on that please let
me know.
=================
p94003@rainbow.**NOSPAM**.cs.unipi.gr
remove **NOSPAM** to reply !
------------------------------
From: PhilBurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: in.ftpd
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 01:47:51 -0500
I installed RedHat 5.0 on an 80 mb hard drive, just so I can run a simple
server to run e-mail, telnet, ftp, etc. Simple stuff. I chucked out as
much stuff as possible and it all fit. Except for some reason, ftp doesn't
work. I must have missed it in the install somewhere. I looked and there's
/usr/sbin/in.telnetd and /usr/sbin/in.fingerd, BUT there's no
/usr/sbin/in.ftpd. I assume that's why ftp doesn't work. (ftp to this
machine, ftp out works fine) Where can I find in.ftpd so I can install
that on it's own, rather than going through the install again? I had to
remove my cd-rom drive to add another hard drive for the /home filesystem,
so I don't have a cd-rom to use anymore! What and where do I install what
to get ftp to work?
***Please e-mail me directly when replying!***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Newbie question
Date: 9 Jan 1999 04:59:50 GMT
I just got my RedHat 5.2 package in the mail today, and am very eager
to set it up. I'm going to buy a HD for it in the morning, and could
install it any time after that. However, I eventually want to turn
this computer into a web server. It doesnt have a NIC right now, and
it would be a while before I could get one. Would it make much of a
difference in terms of installation of the NIC whether i:
1. install linux now, get the card in a few months, and install the
card and necessary drivers later -or-
2. wait a few months, read up a lot on Linux, get the NIC, install and
configure it in Win95 to make sure it's ok, then install Linux
I'm totally new to both networking and linux, but was told that if i
go to caltech in the fall, i'll need to know Unix/Linux, so I'm
finally making the leap i've longed to for so long.
Also, if there are any other tips you could give me, or any good books
you could recommend, I'd appreciate it!
Thanks a lot.
------------------------------
From: "Henning Ahlers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.sex.fetish.linux,at.linux,de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,de.comp.os.unix.linux.newusers,fido.ger.linux,fido.linux-ger,maus.os.linux
Subject: Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:23:27 +0100
Also,
Ahnung hat hier wohl keiner, oder?
Hier nochmal f�r Interessierte und ernste Newsgroupleser meine Frage!! (die
Adressen sind logischerweise nicht richtig, sondern ge�ndert!!)
Hallo,
ich habe eine analoge Standleitung, an beiden Seiten ein US Robotics Modem
und Linux (SuSE 6.0).
Vom Provider habe ich folgende Angaben:
Init-String: at&f1&l1s32=6&w
IP-Subnet: 111.111.111.128/29 (8er Subnet, 6 nutzbare IP-Adressen)
Netzmaske: 255.255.255.248
Adresse f�r PPP-Interface: 222.222.222.210
Providerseite: 333.333.333.333
Da ich Anf�nger in Linux bin, ben�tige ich eine einfache Beschreibung wie
ich ein Netzwerk einrichte. Ich m�chte einen Rechner mit Linux als Firewall
und zur Ansteuerung der Standleitung benutzen und dann ein Netzwerk mit
einem Win98-Rechner aufbauen um von dort das Internet zu nutzen.
�brigens was hei�t: 8er Subnet, 6 nutzbare IP-Adressen?
Vielen Dank im Voraus!
Henning Ahlers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.haol.net
------------------------------
From: Kaz Morishita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Internet via MS Proxy/Firewall?
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:23:58 -0800
Please pardon me if my post is irrelevant.
I have WinProxy1.4 (www.winproxy.net) running on Win98 box with
MultilinkPPP enabled (~100kbps to the Internet for cheap price!).
And I have two other client machines (one Linux, one Win98).
They are running very happily. I can telnet, ftp, use Netscape=20
from my Linux and Win98 clients to the outside world (but no ping). =20
I followed the manual that came with WinProxy1.4 to set things up.
Maybe, you could explain what you have tried so far, so that someone
here or I can provide some help.
Kaz
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Darren Gutwein wrote:
> OK. So I have Proxy 2.0 running a SOCKS proxy - how do I configure Linux=
to
> run through it? I have set the Proxy box as the default gateway, and sti=
ll
> no luck.
>=20
>=20
> Adam wrote in message <76v4ak$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >The only way of doing this (the way you want to do it) is to run a SOCKS
> >proxy on your NT server.
> >
> >You can find socks at http://www.socks.nec.com
> >
> >Of course, if you want to do it the non-retarded way, you can set up an =
IP
> >masquerading firewall on linux, and do the same thing but have the
> following
> >benefits:
> >
> >1) Faster
> >2) Free
> >3) TOTALLY transparent, you don't have to install some bogus client on
> every
> >workstation, just use the Linux box as the default route.
> >
> >You can find a good HOWTO on IP Firewalling/Masquerading with Linux at
> >http://www.flounder.net/firewalling.txt
> >
> >--Adam
> >adam@virtual-estate[nospam].net
> >Quality domain hosting from $5/month
> >http://www.virtual-estate.net
> >
> >Jaco Kr=FCger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >:Anybody know how to fool the NT system into letting my linux box speak
> >:to the outside world? Or perhaps how to get the NT system to accept
> >:Linux as a legitimate client?
> >:
> >:Jaco
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
`Kaz' (Kazuhiko Morishita) =20
==================================================
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
721 Davis Hall - SEMM
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94720-1710
U.S.A.
==================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Sicheneder)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.sex.fetish.linux,at.linux,de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,de.comp.os.unix.linux.newusers,fido.ger.linux,fido.linux-ger,maus.os.linux
Subject: Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 17:39:38 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ich habe eine analoge Standleitung, an beiden Seiten ein US Robotics Modem
Bist Du sicher, dass Du auch wirklich in genuegend newsgroups geposted hast?
Markus
--
>Halb informiert sein, aber volle Meinung abgeben<
Markus Sicheneder, Allmandring 20 C, D-70569 Stuttgart
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://wwwcip.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/~lrt12741/
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:26:03 +0100
Hi there
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, XtamorZ wrote:
> anyone who knows a litlle more German then me ?
I think it something about a leased line.
Regards,
Rob
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: Mark Worsdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: named.boot & hosts files - are these correct use of
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:32:01 +0000
Hi All,
I am afraid I am completely confused:-( and by the look of other people
this is not just me.
All I am wanting to do is have my win98 ethernet TCP use the linux box
for dns lookup, so I set the dns entry for this interface to 10.0.1.252
which is the IP address of the linux box known as jilldando. The win98
DUN TCP interface is not involved since this is setup when I connect to
the internet and is working fine.
I have made sure there are NO hosts & lmhosts files on win98
So know I just need to configure jilldando
The confusion is what to edit for my purposes.
I am wanting to be able to type the following URL's / telnet entries on
my win98 box and have jilldando resolve the names to IP address's so
that the win98 box knows where to get/logon to, in my case usually some
service on jilldando:-
http://www.shadow.home --> 10.0.1.252
http://www.worsdall.home --> 10.0.1.252
http://www.hinwick.home --> 10.0.1.252
http://www.shadow.win98 --> 10.0.1.250
http://www.worsdall.win98 --> 10.0.1.250
http://www.hinwick.win98 --> 10.0.1.250
and for telnet
jilldando --> 10.0.1.252
linux --> 10.0.1.252
jilldando.linux --> 10.0.1.252
So the setup is?:-
/etc/HOSTNAME
jilldando.linux
Now this is the hostname of the linux box and I am OK here.
/etc/host.conf
order hosts, bind
multi on
This means when you get a name request, first look in the hosts file, if
linux box cannot resolve the name to an IP address then use the DNS
service named, is this correct?
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
10.0.1.252 jilldando jilldando.linux
10.0.1.250 win98 worsdall.demon.co.uk
So the linux box gets a request to resolve "jilldando" from win98, is
looks in the hosts file and see's 10.0.1.252 is jilldando and pass's
this IP address back to the win98 machine.
If the linux box gets a request to resolve "www.hinwick.home" from
win98, is looks in the hosts file and cannot find an IP address that
matches the request, so the linux machine (jilldando) will know pass the
request onto the dns service.
Now I am lost:-( what files do we need to sort out? so far I think I
must edit the following files:-
/etc/named.boot
/etc/aliases
/var/named/?????.????
So the DNS service uses:-
/etc/named.boot
;
; a caching only nameserver config
;
directory /var/named
cache . named.ca
primary 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa named.local
which tells named to look in /var/named for the files named.ca and
named.local (these are the only files I have in this directory) I do not
have a file called /var/named/in-addr.arpa and have no idea what it
should contain if it should exist.
So next I though I should logically have some entry in /etc/named.boot
for jilldando IP address's and win98 but what do I put instead of
primary? Would the following 2 lines work? Is secondary correct?
secondary 10.0.1.win98.arpa win98.rev.arpa
secondary 10.0.1.linux.arpa linux.rev.arpa
or should I use CNAME:-
CNAME 10.0.1.win98.arpa win98.rev.arpa
CNAME 10.0.1.linux.arpa linux.rev.arpa
So assuming something above is right:-) I need to create 4 files for the
2 machines?
/var/named/win98.arpa
/var/named/win98.rev.arpa
/var/named/linux.arpa
/var/named/linux.rev.arpa
but I have no idea what or where or how to put anything inside these
files for my purposes, I treid looking and decyphereing what named.local
had in it but to no avail.
/var/named/named.local
@ IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
1997022700 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh
14400 ; Retry
3600000 ; Expire
86400 ) ; Minimum
IN NS localhost.
1 IN PTR localhost.
Would this work for 10.0.1.252?
/var/named/linux.rev.arpa
@ IN SOA jilldando. root.jilldando. www.shadow.home.
www.worsdall.home. www.hinwick.home. (
1997022700 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh
14400 ; Retry
3600000 ; Expire
86400 ) ; Minimum
IN NS jilldando.
1 IN PTR jilldando.
See how lost I am? :-)
How can you even help I am thinking? Maybe with example files for
/var/named/??????.????.????
Mark.
--
Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.worsdall.demon.co.uk
Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.shadow.org.uk
Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB site:- http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
TCP/IP gatewaying http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk/computerDept/
------------------------------
From: David Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.1 and NT Server 4.0 Can't see each other
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 18:33:22 -0500
It only took me ten days to stumble across my blunder, but I found it.
Diald.conf was configured with a local setting with the same ip address as
my NT server. I changed that to something not on my network, and everything
works.
Thanks to anybody who thought about it, and Andrew who tried. Much
appreciated.
Barnes
David Barnes wrote:
> This one is driving me nuts. I have three systems on my network. One
> is running Redhat 5.1. One is NT Server, and the other is NT
> Workstation. Now, with all three systems up, the workstation can ping
> both the Redhat and the NT Server. The workstation can also access
> shared resources and Samba resources on both systems. But, the Redhat
> system cannot ping the NT Server, nor can the NT Server ping the Redhat
> box. Also, the Redhat systems shows up in the NT Server Network
> Neighborhood, but if I double click on it, the box is not found.
>
> Interestingly, I am running IP-Masquarade on the Redhat system for the
> workstation. If I bring up the workstation and then the NT Server, the
> workstation can see the Internet, but if I bring up the NT Server and
> then bring up the workstation, the workstation can not see the Internet,
> although it can see the Redhat Samba resources.
>
> I'm baffled, and I would be grateful for any help.
>
> David Barnes
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jordy Leduc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTP & Root access
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 14:31:41 -0500
I know this is a secutrity risk, but it just a ftp site at home, I have
changed the file /etc/ftpaccess to this.
class all real,guest,anonymous *
email root@localhost
loginfails 5
readme README* login
readme README* cwd=*
message /welcome.msg login
message .message cwd=*
compress yes all
tar yes all
chmod yes all
delete yes all
overwrite yes all
rename yes all
log transfers anonymous,real inbound,outbound
shutdown /etc/shutmsg
How do I give access so root can ftp to this server?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: David Steuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows
Date: 07 Jan 1999 22:06:59 -0500
"Jim Orfanakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
-> I am using X-Win32 on a Win95 PC trying to connect to a RedHat 5.1 system.
-> Whenever I try to start an X application I get connection refused after I
-> enter my userid and password. I tried rsh as well as rexec.
I use XWin32 on NT at work to connect to Solaris Sparc machines. I
don't have access to the .ini file from home, but if you want, you can
mail me at work, and maybe I can help.
My work e-mail address is dsteuber at moneynet dot com.
--
David Steuber
http://www.david-steuber.com
s/trashcan/david/ to reply by mail
"Hackers penetrate and ravage delicate, private, and publicly owned
computer systems, infecting them with viruses and stealing materials
for their own ends. These people, they're, they're terrorists."
-- Secret Service Agent Richard Gill
------------------------------
From: "wkchiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Proxy on Proxy
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 16:23:38 +0800
Hi all,
In the department I am working, there is a PC which can go to internet
through setting proxy in the browser. The IP address of the PC is registered
in the company in order to access the proxy, so that other desktop PC (like
mine) can't go to internet in the same way.
I recently installed RH 5.2 to that PC. I want to install proxy server S/W
on that PC so that our desktop PCs can all go out to internet through that
PC. Can anyone suggest what S/W is needed (and the settings involved) to
allow that RH5.2 box in one way to act as proxy server, and on the other
hand to go to internet through proxy ?
Thanks,
wkchiu
------------------------------
From: Art Mollet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need driver for Netgear FA310TX NIC
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 21:54:25 GMT
Netgear has a nice little starter kit for about
$85.00 at CompUSA. Has anyone used this for RedHat 5.2?
It uses FA310TX NIC cards.
Does anyone have a better suggestion? I want to run Linux
on one box, and let my wife run NT on the other box ( which
also has a removable disk so that I can sometimes run Linux
on it too).
Happy New Year to all.
Thanks,
Art Mollet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Michael Powe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 02 Jan 1999 23:07:13 -0800
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> You see, there are two layers in this shit-cake. There
Alexander> are lusers who buy the scumware and Lose Accounts Fast
Alexander> (tm) and there are shit-peddlers, knowing pretty well
Alexander> what they are doing and bilking aforementioned lusers.
Alexander> Former need to be pitied for their terminal
Alexander> cluelessness and shot. Shit-peddlers... well, they
Alexander> shouldn't get out *that* easy. At least it should be
Alexander> slow and painful. Details may vary according to your
Alexander> tastes.
If I were President
Of this here land,
I'd declare total war
On the spammer man.
I'd cut 'im if stands,
And I'd shoot 'im if he runs,
I'd kill 'im with my Bible,
My Razor and my Gun.
Goddamn the spammer man!
(with apologies to the original! ;-)
mp
8<---------------how-easy-is-it-to-demunge-an-address?------------------->8
#! /usr/bin/perl # if you are [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Another Luser):
while ($line = <>){ if ($line =~ m/^\s*$/ ){ last; }
if ($line =~ m/^From: (\S+) \(([^()]*)\)/){ $from_address = $1; } }
if ($from_address =~ m/\S+NOSPAM\S+/){ $x = index($from_address, NOSPAM);
substr($from_address, $x, 6+1) = ""; printf("The real address is %s\n",
$from_address);}else { printf("No munge, just plain %s\n",$from_address);}
printf("\nBrought to you by the Truth In Mail Headers Foundation\n");
8<-----------------------here's-one-example------------------------------>8
- --
Michael Powe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trollope.org
Portland, Oregon USA
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNo8W2bajuNi/6Js3EQIvSwCcC3xUIxfCB00pL8QMVU67dmaLkgAAoOUd
TWNNpyWJaJ24vx63FjqF6kYD
=rs4j
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
