Linux-Networking Digest #833, Volume #9 Sat, 9 Jan 99 21:13:57 EST
Contents:
Re: /usr over nfs? (Paul Carver)
PPP & ARP Proxy problems (Vik Olliver)
Re: delaying eth0 inititalization ("Richard G.")
Re: Virtual FTP (Terry Soucy)
Dual NIC ("Keith A. Wright")
Name server on @home (Mark Robinson)
Re: Anyone using Cable TV Montgomery cable modems? (boydedoy)
Re: Ping works but nothing else!?! (Malware)
Re: NIC (NE2000) not configured on new system (Jeffery Cann)
Re: Point of Sale (POS) Solutions? (Bill Voight)
Re: Telneting as "root" (hamid misnan)
Samba and Appache setups ("Bill the Human Half")
Re: Help with PPP to ISP via pppd (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Linux proxy question!!! (Vik Olliver)
Re: Dual NIC Routing (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Displaying System Resources ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help with AX.25 and Amateur Radio ("Gary Dewrell")
Re: dial-in to linux from win95 dialup (Andrew Adams)
Re: NTP Under Linux (Job eisses)
Routing across multiple NICs ("Scott Swanson")
Re: nt linux routing probs (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Smbmount error (Sam Steingold)
Re: Linux proxy question!!! ("Barton Hodges (MindPhlux)")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Carver)
Subject: Re: /usr over nfs?
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 03:31:31 GMT
On 08 Jan 1999 12:21:43 +0100, "Michael Schmeing"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>[...]
>> I believe you can do it, you should only leave /sbin, /bin
>> on the local machines.
>
>Not to mention /lib
Actually, I was going to say just the opposite. I'm trying this and I
found that mounting /usr over nfs didn't work well unless I also
mounted /lib over nfs. Software installed on a Linux machine
frequently has part of itself in /usr and part in /lib so if you mount
/usr remotely and /lib locally you are likely to have problems unless
you've installed the same software on both machines. In which case,
why mount /usr over nfs?
Currently I have Linux installed on a 212MB hard drive accessing /usr,
/lib, and /home over nfs (to a machine with an 8.5GB hard drive). My
eventual goal is to create a floppy disk that will boot Linux without
using the local hard drive at all.
I'd like to be able to stick a floppy disk into a Windows NT machine
on the same Ethernet as my Linux machine and have the Windows NT
machine behave as a fully functional Linux machine without affecting
the NT installation at all. I've followed the Boot Disk Howto, but no
luck so far.
------------------------------
From: Vik Olliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP & ARP Proxy problems
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:30:58 +1300
Well I've got as far as getting the Linux box logging in to my ISP via
PPP. Can run Netscape via a Win95 Xserver even, and Samba works too.
However, even though I've told my Win95 box that my Linux box is a
gateway, I can't access the web on the Win95 box (unless of course I
plug the modem into it directly, which spoils the point).
I do get some errors concering Proxy ARP in my message log:
Jan 11 12:52:45 hawk pppd[299]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
Jan 11 12:53:17 hawk pppd[299]: Serial connection established.
Jan 11 12:53:18 hawk pppd[299]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 11 12:53:18 hawk pppd[299]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jan 11 12:53:19 hawk pppd[299]: Warning - secret file
/etc/ppp/pap-secrets has w
orld and/or group access
Jan 11 12:53:20 hawk pppd[299]: proc file system not mounted
Jan 11 12:53:20 hawk pppd[299]: Cannot determine ethernet address for
proxy ARP
Jan 11 12:53:20 hawk pppd[299]: local IP address 209.78.51.111
Jan 11 12:53:20 hawk pppd[299]: remote IP address 203.29.165.44
I've been through the Masquerade and PPP HOWTOs with no luck, and even
scoured the dejanews comp.os.linux archive. If someone can help me with
suggesting where I'm fouling things up, I'd appreciate it. I'll even
update the FAQ!
Vik :v)
------------------------------
From: "Richard G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: delaying eth0 inititalization
Date: 10 Jan 1999 00:28:56 GMT
Jeff wrote in message ...
>Trying to setup my nic, ne2000 comp., with RH Linux 5.1 and I keep on
>getting the subject message during bootup. Did everything that I could
find
>that's been documented in how-to's and these newsgroups. Autoprobe did not
>find it. Did all of the following:
>
>Added ether=... to lilo.conf
>Did ifconfig eth0 ... up, I get message "Operation not supported by device"
>Went into netconfig, activated eth0. Can ping 127.0.0.1, but not given ip
>address.
>
>Any suggestions on what else to try, or should I just grab another nic?
>
>
Jeff,
I had this same problem with my Linksys Ether16 card. It turns out that
Linksys ships their cards with Plug-N-Play enabled. I simply used the DOS
utility that came with the card to disable PNP. Linux likes NIC cards at
Bass Address 0x300 at IRQ 10, so try manualy setting your card to those
settings. Linux should find it then.
Richard Gunderson
------------------------------
From: Terry Soucy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Virtual FTP
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:17:34 -0400
Danny Johnson wrote:
>
> "Virtual FTP"? Please explain what you mean for those of us who are
> ignorant.
>
> Mark Hamilton wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I remember reading somewhere in a howto or man page or something about
> >getting software for doing a virtual FTP for virtual domains. Can anyone
> >tell me where to find that software, or at least where I read it because I
> >think it had the place to find it.
> >Thanks
> >
> >
There is a virtual ftp patch for wuftpd. It only recognizes
anon ftp access for virtual domains. You can get it at the
same places you can get wuftpd. I got it from
http://www.linuxhq.com, in the Linux Software Browser.
Hope this helps.
Terry
------------------------------
From: "Keith A. Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dual NIC
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:34:44 -0500
Hello,
I have a Linux box setup with IP Masquerading. The box now has 2 NIC's one
to a cable modem and one for my LAN. I previously had only one card
connecting my LAN to the interned via Linux (which was only connected using
PPP and a 33.6 serial modem). I recently signed up with MediaOne cable so
installed a second card. Instead of running pppd, I had to switch to dhcpd.
I was soon up and running. I downloaded a 9MB file in about a minute and a
half (during non peak time of course). My problem is this. My Linux box
was running a web server with a registered domain alphalinx.com. Until I
can transfer the domain I need to keep the server active. I figured all I
had to do was use the pppd in conjunction with the dhcp demeon. However,
all network traffic on the LAN of Win'95 computers gets routed through the
serial port instead of the network interface (eth0) which is connected to
the cable modem. Why is traffic defaulting to the serial port and how do I
change this to the cable modem route?
Thanks in advance
Keith
------------------------------
From: Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Name server on @home
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 18:21:57 GMT
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Has anyone had success in installing/running a primary name server will
using @home?</html>
------------------------------
From: boydedoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone using Cable TV Montgomery cable modems?
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 13:24:53 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the same thing,and found ppp scripts at:
http://powerlink.adelphia.net/support/surfboard/surfboard_software.html
it seems to take care of the problem, (although i'm having other problems with
the modem). Take a look at ppp directory in the tar file.
Matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm interested in the same thing.... if anyone can provide more information on
> this, I'd be grateful (including the original author)....
>
> It seems as if there needs to be some sort of "shim" in the networking code
> on the client machine which makes IP think that the return packet came from
> the PPP interface on the PC instead of from the Ethernet interface where it
> actually came from...
>
> More I do not know. But would like to.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Mulvaney) wrote:
> > Is anybody out there using Cable TV Montgomery(in Rockville, Maryland)
> > cable modems with Linux? I am interesting in signing up for the
> > service, but I want to use Linux and not 95/98. This is a hybrid
> > design, with a telephone connection for upwards traffic. I have to
> > provide the modem.
> >
> > Thanks for any advice.
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mulvaney
> > Man: With proper funding, I'm confident this little baby could destroy
> > an area the size of New York City.
> > Grampa: But I want to help people, not kill them!
> > Man: Oh. Well, to be honest, the ray only has evil applications...
> > -- Everybody wants to get their hands on... ``Old Money''
> >
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping works but nothing else!?!
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 14:49:31 +0100
Hi Per,
you wrote:
> I'm running Redhat 5.2 and everything works fine - "locally". All
> network services (ftp, telnet, www etc) answers on calls I make from
> Linux itself (both to loopback and eth0). I then connected my laptop
> (using ethernet) to build a small LAN (no hub, but cross over cable). As
> soon as I got the routing table right I was able to ping in both
> directions, and both machines can ping themselves. But when I try to
> reach the Linux-box from the laptop with telnet, ftp or the web browser,
> nothing happens. The Linux doesn't seem to even register the incoming
> request.
If you with telnet get a 'connected to ...' and then nothing more just
add a entry for the second machine in /etc/hosts.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Jeffery Cann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIC (NE2000) not configured on new system
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 11:36:21 -0700
If your NE2000 card is PCI, you can execute the following command to see
the exact chipset:
cat /proc/pci | more
This will list the memory addresses, interrupts, and chipsets of all pnp
pci cards and chipsets on the motherboard of your system. Unlike
another suggestion, I did not have to manually configure the memory
address of my NE2000 card (RealTek 8139 chipset). But I am using a P100
box with pnp bios.
Once I knew the chipset, I just read the 'Ethernet-HOWTO' for the
sections on NE2000 cards, recompiled my kernel and viola! No problem.
You can get the 'Ethernet-HOWTO' at the linux documentation project:
http://www.ssc.com/linux/LDP/index.html
Jeff
AJ Hynson wrote:
>
> I am just starting with Linux, have an Open Linux Lite 1.2 (Calderra)
> instalation CD and a mostly working system. The system is a 486/66 AST with
> 20 MB of RAM. It was running WIndows '95 without a hitch. I have the device
> settings for all (to include the network adapter) components, and so far all
> is well except for the netowrk interface (which does not exist). I don't
> have any particularly useful documentation, but I have an NE2000 (clone)
> that worked fine with '95. Can anyone tell me the steps to get my system to
> recognize/install the NIC, or point me to some on-line documentation that
> will answer my questions? Thanks in advance for an assistance!
>
> AJ Hynson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Bill Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Point of Sale (POS) Solutions?
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:02:08 -0500
Jason,
Check out Linux Journal. There's an article on a Linux POS system in one
of the most recent issues- can't remember which.
BV
"Jason P. Stanford" wrote:
> I have been asked to look into whether there is a Linux + Win (or
> possibly just Linux) solution for a small retail business. This store
> currently has one location and will be opening a second one by the end
> of the first quarter. Their current setup includes several Wintel PC's
> running a DOS-based POS system in a DOS window. This has been working
> ok, but it is limited to five stations, does not have an integrated
> general accounting, payroll, etc program. It is only the inventory and
> register functions.
> Because of the second store opening, they are wondering what their
> options are. I am not an expert in these types of integrated systems,
> but I am pretty familiar with both Linux and WinNT. Is there such a
> software system that would allow the second location to connect to a
> server at the first (say via a 56k modem or two, using PPP or SLIP) to
> access it's database, while running the POS/accounting software? Where
> should I begin to look?
> I felt that a Linux solution would serve them best because of its
> reliability, networking, inexpensiveness, and customability. Please
> help! Thanks!
------------------------------
From: hamid misnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Telneting as "root"
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:09:40 +0800
"A.G." wrote:
>
> I have just configured two ethernet cards to connect two linux machines.
>
> I can remotely telnet to any of the machines, but not as root to either.
> Just as a regular user.
>
> Is this normal or I have misconfigured smth?
It is normal & for security reason. If you want to enable root access
via telnet, add addditionl entry into /etc/securetty for telnet session.
Offhand, don't remember what tty for telnet, but somebody should be able
to guide you here.
------------------------------
From: "Bill the Human Half" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba and Appache setups
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:59:57 -0400
Hello ,
I have a small network running. My multiboot Server, Linux / Windoze98.
When in 98 the other stations can print and access the net via sharing and
Sygate proxy.
When I boot into Linux the other stations can use the web, mail, ftp etc...
via ip masq.
I how ever can't print or see the Linux Box except by pinging it by ip.
I have tried setting up Samba and have had no luck. I haven't found a good
HOWTO. Can anyone give me a helpful instruction package.
Also on my Windows side I have my own domain via inetcam.com.. I use a
windows based program that sends my ip to them and they use my
vgaphost.inetcam.com as the IP fowarding. I use the PWS and Sygate prozy
firewall to host my Local ftp and web site.
By now you are wondering were I am going.. Appache was installed via the
Redhat 5.2 package. I upgraded from 5.0 adding everything.. I can't seem to
get it working.. I start it goto another computer on my land and http:// IP
or vgaphost and get nothing. Can anyone help with this..
Thanks in advance for any help given...
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with PPP to ISP via pppd
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:02:46 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had the same problem for a while. Insure all your ppp-on additions are double
checked. I had the ppp
scripts off in a seperate dir and when I ran ppp-on out of /etc/ppp it ran ok
and the LCP drops and errors
stopped. Something bogus creaped into my ppp-on scripts I think. I re-edited
fresh copies of the scripts - put
them back into my other dir and now it runs without the LCP errors. I have
heard of this happening to a few
other people with not explination of what triggers the LCP errors. There are
values that can be putzed with
in the options file for LCP but chances are the problem is not there if you had
ppp working at one time. See
PPP-HOWTO and search on LCP.
Pedro Ferreira wrote:
> I'm also having a similar problem, my logs also have a lcp pap request after
> a username/password prompt... If you find a solution for this please let me
> know!
>
> Clifford Kite wrote in message <76r5tt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Michael Dobbins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >: I've recently being trying to get my Linux box act as a dial manager for
> >: my internet connection, and have run into some trouble when not using X.
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >: Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0
> >: Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> >: Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
> >: 0x94beab9e> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> >: Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> >: <auth pap> <magic 0x19b9a868> <pcomp> <accomp> < 13 0c 01 4e 65 77 63 61
> >: 73 74 6c 65>]
> >: Jan 4 22:17:29 linux pppd[391]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <auth pap> <
> >: 13 0c 01 4e 65 77 63 61 73 74 6c 65>]
> >
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Vik Olliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux proxy question!!!
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 08:21:48 +1300
I had problems with Aventail AutoSOCKS on our LAN at work after a Win95
"upgrade". In desparation, you might try using Hummingbird HumSOCKS
which is more configurable than the old one of Aventail's that I had,
and is absolutely free. It's off
http://www.hummingbird.com/freestuff.htm
Vik :v)
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dual NIC Routing
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 19:50:25 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============803E92C8822908511BBFFF0E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Craig Hanson wrote:
> What would be the best way to setup a Linux box in between a
> satellite ISP and a ADSL line. Here is the setup...
>
>
>
> (Satellite)------[Router]
> |
> |
> [ Eth0 ]
> [Linux ]
> [ Eth1 ]-----[ADSL]
>
>
> I have a block of IP's from the Satellite provider:
> 201.32.44.128 - 201.32.44.159
> So the netmask is 255.255.255.224 the network IP is
> 201.32.44.128 and the broadcast is 201.32.44.159
> The router is at 201.32.44.129.
> It took and subnetted it more at the linux machine so that...
> Eth0: IP 201.32.44.130 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast
> 201.32.44.135
> Eth1: IP 201.32.44.137 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast
> 201.32.44.147
>
> I have IP forwarding enabled in the kernel
> The routing table is as follows
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
> Ref Use Iface
> 201.32.44.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 1
> 0 0 eth0
> 201.32.44.136 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 1
> 0 0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0 201.32.44.129 0.0.0.0 U 1
> 0 0 eth0
>
Craig,
When you tcpdump -nei eth0 and tcpdump -nei eth1 what do you
get when you ping 201.32.44.128.
Who does arp -a show?
d
>
>
> Craig
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============803E92C8822908511BBFFF0E
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<p>Craig Hanson wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>What would be the best way to setup a Linux box in
between a satellite ISP and a ADSL line. Here is the setup...
<br>
<br>
<p><tt>(Satellite)------[Router]</tt>
<br><tt>
|</tt>
<br><tt>
|</tt>
<br><tt>
[ Eth0 ]</tt>
<br><tt>
[Linux ]</tt>
<br><tt>
[ Eth1 ]-----[ADSL]</tt>
<br>
<p>I have a block of IP's from the Satellite provider: 201.32.44.128 -
201.32.44.159
<br>So the netmask is 255.255.255.224 the network IP is 201.32.44.128 and
the broadcast is 201.32.44.159
<br>The router is at 201.32.44.129.
<br>It took and subnetted it more at the linux machine so that...
<br>Eth0: IP 201.32.44.130 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast 201.32.44.135
<br>Eth1: IP 201.32.44.137 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast 201.32.44.147
<p>I have IP forwarding enabled in the kernel
<br>The routing table is as follows
<p><tt>Destination
Gateway
Genmask Flags Metric
Ref Use Iface</tt>
<br><tt>201.32.44.128 0.0.0.0
255.255.255.248 U 1
0 0 eth0</tt>
<br><tt>201.32.44.136 0.0.0.0
255.255.255.248 U 1
0 0 eth1</tt>
<br><tt>0.0.0.0 201.32.44.129
0.0.0.0 U
1 0 0
eth0</tt>
<br> </blockquote>
<p><br>Craig,
<br> When you tcpdump -nei eth0 and tcpdump -nei eth1
what do you get when you ping 201.32.44.128.
<br>Who does arp -a show?
<br>d
<br>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<p>Craig
<br> </blockquote>
<p>--
<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<br> </html>
==============803E92C8822908511BBFFF0E==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Displaying System Resources
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 23:41:03 GMT
Uhh, no...it didn't.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After installing KDE I fund
> xsysinfo
> xcpustate
> and
> xload...
>
> Hope it helped you
>
> Athan
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a UNIX commandline utility for monitoring system resources? I'm
> > writing a program that I want to optimize based on system resources such as
> > network card throughput, cpu usage, memory usage...etc. In particular, I
> > would think that the NIC would be the bottleneck in this application so some
> > good numbers on outbound/inbound and general load nic would be great. I
could
> > live with getting the rest of the info from proc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike Allen
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Gary Dewrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with AX.25 and Amateur Radio
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:31:36 -0600
First what I have:
Redhat Linux 5.2
KPC-3 TNC
Kenwood 733
First when I ran kissattatch I got an error "cannot open axports file" so I
moved the file to the root directory and that whent away.
Now Im getting: kissattach: TIOCSETD: Invalid argument.
I used the following command line:
kissattach -i 204.189.115.85 -m 512 /dev/ttyS2 radio
my axports file has one line:
radio kd5abq 1200 256 2 test
Any help would be greatly appreciated
------------------------------
From: Andrew Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dial-in to linux from win95 dialup
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 17:11:51 -0600
I got mgetty+sendfax sources and compiled it. The binary came with SuSE
5.3 but I couldn't make it work, probably wasn't compiled with the
-DAUTO_PPP switch, whatever. Greg Doering wrote a great program, and
the docs are great. I edited the makefile to set:
#define DEVICE_GROUP "modem"
#define DEFAULT_PORTSPEED 38400
#define MAX_LOGIN_TIME 60
#define LOG_PATH "/var/log/mgetty.%s"
CFLAGS=-02 -Wall -pipe -DAUTO_PPP
In the login.config:
/AutoPPP/ - - /usr/sbin/pppd auth -chap +pap login modem crtscts
proxyarp
In /etc/inittab:
mo:23:respawn:/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -D ttyS1
The -D means don't answer fax calls, the ttyS1, rather than modem, is
the recomendation of the author.
/etc/ppp/options:
lock (you may need -detach, Greg advised to try without first)
//etc/ppp/options.ttyS1:
172.20.1.1:172.20.1.5 (I use masquerade & non-internet-routable
IPs; .1 is the server, .5 is the modem)
It works.
coke wrote:
>
> i wanna setup a dial-in server to my linux thingy ..
> i managed to get it to answer the phone ..
> but when i start the pppd the win95 dialup thingy closes ...
> does anyone know what options should i use in the pppd to make it work ??
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 01:53:23 +0100
From: Job eisses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: NTP Under Linux
Mark Riehl wrote:
> Is anyone using NTP (servers and clients) under Linux? If so, which
> version of NTP are you using?
xntp3-5.93-4 (redhat 5.2)
>
> Also, I'm having some trouble setting up the config files. Does anyone
> know of (or have) samples that I could take a look at?
> Please CC any replies to me.
For a client all you need is one or more lines with "server <servername>".
This one has a lot in it: http://www.inria.fr/semir/reseau/ntp
It is a linux box with a GPS card in it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Scott Swanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing across multiple NICs
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 15:22:25 -0800
Hello,
I'm setting up my first Linux box running 5.2. My machine is configured
with two network cards. eth0 is connected to my private network using
192.168.0.254 all machines other machines on the private have
192.168.0.x addresses as well. eth1 is connected to the internet via an
ADSL connection and gets it's address via DHCP from my ISP. This is all
working fine. However, my home network also has a gateway to the
internet via another machine. I would like to configure my Linux box so
that eth0 *only* allows packets addressed to 192.168.0.x machines onto
that network and all other packets go out onto the internet via eth1.
I'm sure this is explained in one of the HowTos, but I couldn't find
it... I'd appreciate it if anyone could show me the proper route
commands I'll need to accomplish this routing.
Thanks,
-Scott
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nt linux routing probs
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:22:01 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add a route on the linux box to the network card on the nt gateway box. Is
the network made known
by putting it in /etc/networks ..... for a class c say: ntgatewaynetwork
192.168.1 in networks for the
card 192.168.1.1 on the nt gateway.
d
Matthew Papas wrote:
> Is the linux box set to use the same NT gateway as the other machines on
> network 1? It sounds like it isn't. If it is, the NT machine will
> route the packets just fine through to the other network as long as it's
> accepting packets from the address of the linux box. Check to see what
> the gateway address is set to on the linux box, it should point to the
> nt server that's acting as a gateway between the 2 networks.
>
> Matt Papas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Smbmount error
Date: 09 Jan 1999 19:00:43 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> On the subject of "Re: Smbmount error"
>>>> Sent on 08 Jan 1999 23:55:37 +0100
>>>> Honorable root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I myself made an rpm out of samba-2.0.0beta5 in order to have the
>> files put in the proper places (insted of /usr/local). If you need
>> help on that please let me know.
it would be nice if you made the RPMs available through rhcn.redhat.com
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.goems.com/~sds) running RedHat5.2 GNU/Linux
Micros**t is not the answer. Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
Man has 2 states: hungry/angry and sate/sleepy. Catch him in transition.
------------------------------
From: "Barton Hodges (MindPhlux)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux proxy question!!!
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 14:16:44 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vik Olliver wrote:
>
> I had problems with Aventail AutoSOCKS on our LAN at work after a Win95
> "upgrade". In desparation, you might try using Hummingbird HumSOCKS
> which is more configurable than the old one of Aventail's that I had,
> and is absolutely free. It's off
> http://www.hummingbird.com/freestuff.htm
>
> Vik :v)
Thanks... I looked at hummingbird something or another, but is was some
funky dos setup, and even with my 7 years of dos work, I couldn't get it
to install correctly. Maybe I got an outdated version, though.....
Any other sugguestions, if that dosen't work?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
