Linux-Networking Digest #888, Volume #9 Fri, 15 Jan 99 14:13:27 EST
Contents:
Re: need ip_masq help (Raymond Doetjes)
Re: DNS/DHCP behavior (Brian McCauley)
Re: Sendmail-Config. (Raymond Doetjes)
IPX PrinterServer and RH 5.1 ("Ryan C. Payne")
Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly?
("Richard S. Lumpkin")
Linux-Linux networking problem (Jesse Hughes)
NFS linux server and an AIX client ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
modules confusion (Spivey)
Re: X network questions (Raymond Doetjes)
Redundant Servers (r)
PCI Card NE2000 compatible (Lorenzo Morbidelli)
Re: Problem resolving names on linux system ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Please HELP - packets are not forwarded (Tony Cuevas)
Re: tcp/ip from Win98 to Linux: Strange behaviour ("griffenjam")
Re: Setting up a linux box as a router with IP adress translation (Vincent Zweije)
Re: home network (SuprMath)
socket error 10065 ipop3d port 110 ("zeit")
Telnet (David Moore)
Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems) (Detlef Bosau)
Re: SLOW PPP Connection (Frank Kuehnel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need ip_masq help
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:13:54 +0100
Did you enter de default gateway IP addres on your other computers?
This address should point to your Linuxbox its IP address.
Raymond
benjamin j snyder wrote:
> I need some help with getting IP-MASQ up and running. I have my new kernel
> up and running (with the config options in the IP-MASQ-HOW-TO selected as 'y'),
> I have both NICs up and running (I can ping the internal network, and I can
> also use the www, telnet, etc).
>
> However, I cannot get to the internet from any of the other machines on the
> local network. I set them up according to the MASQ-HOWTO as well, but get
> nada on them. They can ping the linux box, but it doesnt show up in network
> neighborhood, but to my understanding it shouldnt since samba is not running
> correct?
>
> I have seen many scripts/commands to add in rc.d, but they all seem to be
> related to PPP. I am running TCP/IP with a (somewhat) static IP (it changes
> every now and then) on the internet connection (cable modem), and static
> 192.168.*.* on the internal.
>
> BTW my NICs are 3c509 and my kernel is 2.0.36.
>
> Any help will be -=*GREATLY*=- appreciated...Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Ben Snyder
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS/DHCP behavior
Date: 14 Jan 1999 18:45:11 +0000
Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have both DNS (named) and DHCP (dhcpd) running. On the linux box, DNS
> fails to resolve any requests for machines given IPs by DHCP.
>
> DNS requests over the network are resovled.
>
> SO, on the linux box, ping othello produces unknown host, but on a NT WS
> on the network ping othello produces the correct result.
AFAIK this is because it falls back to WINS not DNS.
Like I said last week in answer to this question, the DHCP/dynamic-DNS
stuff is still in the IETF-draft stage.
Please read before you post.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail-Config.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:15:34 +0100
Try posting this at comp.mail.sendmail
I know that it is possible, but I should search my sendmail bible to
tell you how. (I can't seem to find the ... book).
Raymond
Johannes Treml wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to restrict the access to a smtp-server (sendmail)?
>
> I would like to restrict the acces by IP-addresses or host-names.
>
> Greeting
>
> Johannes
------------------------------
From: "Ryan C. Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: IPX PrinterServer and RH 5.1
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:04:01 -0500
Hello there...
I am running RH 5.1 and have a HP 4L printer on the network which
uses the IPX protocol. Is there any way to print to this from Linux?
Unfortunatley the print server does not support TCP/IP.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
R.C.
--
==================================
Ryan C. Payne, MSIS, BSN, RN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Support Consultant
Department of Radiology
Division of Radiology Informatics
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
200 Lothrop Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582
------------------------------
From: "Richard S. Lumpkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND
idiot-friendly?
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:54:58 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MalkContent wrote:
>
Yada, yada, yada.
Why don't you yap about this on the advocacy newsgroups and level the
technical discussions groups out of it. We're trying to help and learn
about Linux, whining about how hard you find it has no place here.
========================================================================
Richard S. Lumpkin, Ph.D. Associate Professor
Department of Chemistry 256-890-6365
University of Alabama in Huntsville fax 256-890-6349
Huntsville, AL 35899 http://chromophore.uah.edu
========================================================================
Forward Fraudulent Spam to the US Federal Trade Commission: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jesse Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux-Linux networking problem
Date: 14 Jan 1999 13:38:08 -0500
Hey ho.
This is my third posting of this problem. The suggestions I've
received gave me something to look at, but I couldn't find anything
wrong. The routing tables for both machines look okay - They're
appended here.
Here's the statement of the problem:
I have two Linux boxes (one a dual boot) and just purchased two 3c509s
with a hub. I'm having some trouble with the dual boot machine.
The dedicated Linux box has address 10.0.0.1 and the dual boot
10.0.0.2. When 1 pings 2, tcpdump shows messages being sent from 1 to
2, but no response from 2. Ping reports similarly (sometimes, I get a
packet returned, but rarely. So far, it hasn't happened when tcpdump
has been running).
When 2 pings 1, tcpdump shows a normal request and reply pattern, but
ping responds oddly. First, only even numbered requests are shown as
having replies, and their replies have duplicates. Second, the
reported time of the return trip is huge. It's almost as if the whole
packet has been shifted by one bit or something.
This problem is only present when the dual boot (2) is running Linux.
Everything seems to work peachy when Win95 is running. I conclude
that something is screwy with my Linux setup on 2. However, it
doesn't seem to be the kernel -- I tried installing 1's kernel in 2,
as a test. No difference in the symptoms.
Here's the results of netstat -rn:
(10.0.0.2)
Kernel routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
(10.0.0.1)
Kernel routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
128.2.13.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 4 lo
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 128.2.13.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 168 ppp0
128.2.13.1 is my P-t-P address. I don't understand routing well, but
this looks okay to me. Am I mistaken?
PLEASE help out -- my network is currently useless.
--
Jesse Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/user/jesse/jesse.html
------------------------------
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS linux server and an AIX client
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 13:33:26 -0600
when i try to mount a NFS mount on an aixv3 client i recieve:
mount: 1831-010: server LINUX_server not responding: RPC: sucess
mount retrying
LINUX_server:/filesystem
mount: 1831-011: access denied for linux_server: /filesystem
mount: 1831-008 giving up on
LINUX_server:/filesystem
The file acces permissions do not allow the specified action.
my /etc/exports read
/filesystem -rw=AIX_server_hostname
/filesystem -rw=AIX_server_ipaddress
the exports file was exported.
NFS server was stopped and restarted
in messages on the linux server i get:
Kernel: Warning: possible SYN Flood from AIX_server on Linux_server:653
mountd: NFS mount of filesystem attemted from AIX_server
mountd: NFS client <anon client> tried to access filesystem
mountd: Blocked attempt attempt of AIX_server to mount filesystem
???????
where do i start looking? any ideas please reply via e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spivey)
Subject: modules confusion
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:26:26 GMT
I'm working with the IP Masquerade HOWTO and am stuck on the
part about modules. I don't know where to unpack them to. /usr/src?
I downloaded modules-2.0.0.tar.gz and as I understand it I
need to then do [make modules; make modules_install] after they are
unpacked. Correct?
thanks,
------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X network questions
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:40:58 +0100
Okay there are several ways to do this you could setup rsh or use telnet
the latter is less configureing:
FI. your pentium it host name is pentium and you 486 its host name is tiny
first type
xhost pentium
(this allows client connects from pentium to you 486 server This might sound
strange, but in this case your 486 is the server and all the X app's are
clients)
telnet pentium
then login as a user
now for the trick start startoffice f.i.:
/opt/Office40/bin/soffice -display tiny:0.0
the -display hostname:0.0 tells your x client (the app) to redirect its out put
to the host tine on display 0 of server 0. Most often tiny:0 is enough but
I like this better.
If you might have rsh running (added machines to hosts.equiv)
then you can do the same: rsh -pentium /opt/Office40/bin/soffice -display
tine:0.0
This is easier when you want to make icons on your desktop.
(I told this was easy but you just have to know how ;-)
Raymond
Don Cook wrote:
> I have a pentium pc running RH 5.2, X and Star Office. I want to ethernet
> connect a 486 workstation running X (or as a "remote" X terminal) and
> sharing Star Office, data files stored on the pentium and the printer
> connected to the pentium.
>
> Is a non-dedicated server network like this possible in Linux? Roughly what
> are the packages I need installed on the workstation and the server to do
> all this?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Don Cook
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Redundant Servers
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:49:45 GMT
I have been searching for information on creating redundant servers,
which it seems there are few(realistic and unrealistic) options. After
reading things like the linux-ha howto, etc, etc, there may be a few
possible solutions, hopefully without having to buy expensive software:
a) Two servers sharing a dual-port RAID , with failover support.
b) Two servers with separate drives, where data is mirrored between the
two over a network interface, with failover support.
Some questions that need to be answered are:
1) Are there any possibilities of setting up a dual-port RAID with
Linux?
2) Would option 'b' be a good idea using something like rsync(running
every x mins or whatever):
- at all?
- while using Sybase or MySQL? (concern for open files)
3) Am I crazy? (rsync w/FAKE{IP takeover} sounds like it could be made
to work, but would be messy)
Suggestions? Comments?
------------------------------
From: Lorenzo Morbidelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCI Card NE2000 compatible
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 18:23:27 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a PCI NE2000 compatible marked as "PCICARD W40"
Does anyone know the name of the maker or where I can download
an updated driver?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Problem resolving names on linux system
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:55:01 GMT
In article <36792f31.8901269@windsurf>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I have a problem configuring my linux computer, and I didn't find a
> solution in docs, howtos, faq & newsgroups......
>
> The network is correctly configured, with 2 networks cards, one
> connected with a server, and the other one to the Internet.
> I've defined the gateway, the 2 DNS, the IP @ of my machine.
>
> When I try a ping or a telnet on a distant computer (f.ex:
> www.yahoo.com), I'l answered:
> ping: unknown host www.yahoo.com
>
> If I do: nslookup www.yahoo.com I get:
> Server: xx.xxxxxx.xx (name @ of my DNS)
> Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (IP @ of my DNS)
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name: www9.yahoo.com
> Address: 204.71.200.74
> Aliases: www.yahoo.com
>
> And then: ping 204.71.200.74 works !!!
> PING 204.71.200.74 (204.71.200.74): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 204.71.200.74: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=190.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 204.71.200.74: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=196.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 204.71.200.74: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=185.9 ms
> (...)
>
> Please, heeelp !!!
>
> Why doesn't it resolv the name @ when pinging, while nslookup works ?
>
> ---
> Nicolas G�lenne
> Developer - Push Contact
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I had almost identical problem. I solved it by checking /etc/nsswitch.conf
In it's hosts line, it should have a dns entry, e.g.
hosts: files dns
Hope this helps.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Tony Cuevas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Please HELP - packets are not forwarded
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:36:19 -0800
Packets are not forwared by my linux box out to the net
or to my lan.
>From my linux box (the router) I can ping out to the
net and I can ping each of my machines on the private
lan. Machines on the lan can ping x.y.z.35 but they can't ping
x.y.z.34 (or anything outside the network addr for that matter).
Can someone please help me figure out what am I doing wrong???
I'm running RH5.2 on an alpha. Recompiled the kernel to include
firewalling and ipforwarding.
Also, my "route add..." commands are not stored permanently-
they must be typed in after I reboot. Is there a file
that I can modify permanently?
Thanks in advance.
/tc
ISP(gateway a.b.c.33) --- (eth0-a.b.c.34)/(eth1-a.b.c.35)---(lan)
Linux router
used:
route add -host x.y.z.33 dev eth0
route add -host x.y.z.34 dev eth0
route add -net x.y.z.32 dev eth1
route add default gw x.y.z.33
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
x.y.z.33 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 4 eth0
x.y.z.34 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
x.y.z.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 6 eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 8
lo
0.0.0.0 x.y.z.33 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 13 eth0
"cat /proc/ioports"
0060-006f : keyboard
02f8-02ff : serial(auto)
03bc-03be : lp
03f0-03f5 : floppy
03f7-03f7 : floppy DIR
03f8-03ff : serial(auto)
8000-807f : DE434/5 (eth0)
8800-887f : DC21140 (eth1)
9000-907f : ncr53c8xx
"cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward"
1
addr block given to me by my ISP
x.y.z.32 - network addr
x.y.z.33 - gateway
x.y.z.34 - host (eth0)
x.y.z.35 - host (eth1)
x.y.z.36 - host
x.y.z.37 - host
x.y.z.38 - host
x.y.z.39 - broadcast
------------------------------
From: "griffenjam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tcp/ip from Win98 to Linux: Strange behaviour
Date: 14 Jan 1999 12:33:47 GMT
I have the same problem, but w/mine IT take like 5 minutes to logon to my
linux
macine
it just sayz Connected to 90.0.0.1
and sitz thetre for HELLA long.
Whatz w/that?
Alex Bruschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<77k0rt$4s0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
> I have a tiny (2 pc) tcp/ip network. One of them is a Win98 pc (adress
> 192.168.0.1) and the other a Linux pc (adress 192.168.0.2). When I use
ping
> from my Win98 pc to the Linuc pc there is no problem.
> But when I use ftp or telnet (ftp 192.168.0.2) Win98 first tries to dial
in
> on my internet provider and when I cancel this only then it works fine
and I
> can connect to the Linux pc.
>
> Two questions:
>
> How can I prevent Win98 from first dialling to the internet when I try to
> use the local tcp/ip connection ?
> Why doesn't this happen when I use ping ?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up a linux box as a router with IP adress translation
Date: 13 Jan 1999 14:37:06 +0100
In article <77g1gv$pco$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joakim Kosmo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Setup description with cable modem-connected 486 with private LAN
behind it.]
|| Would somebody with Linux experience tell me if this is possible under
|| Linux?
I'm tempted to say it's easy. For you, it probably is.
|| Have anybody out there tried a solution like this?
Definitely.
|| To do this I
|| would need router SW, and firewall SW (to do the address translation), is
|| this software standard in the Linux packages?
Router software is standard (ifconfig/route commands). Firewall software
is standard (ipfwadm/ipchains commands).
|| And finally I would appreciate if
|| you could direct me to manuals and other online information.
The NET-3 HOWTO.
Good luck. Vincent.
--
Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "If you're flamed in a group you
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/> | don't read, does anybody get burnt?"
[Xhost should be taken out and shot] | -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SuprMath)
Subject: Re: home network
Date: 15 Jan 1999 18:09:00 GMT
Hey everybody, why don't we take up a collection and get Bard's caplsock key
fixed for him?
=Brian
------------------------------
From: "zeit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: socket error 10065 ipop3d port 110
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:08:11 -0600
Setup: RH5.1 LINUX
2 nic's
Internal network - no problem
external network - problem
When trying to get or send mail from external machine get socket error.
Using ipop3d. Can telnet to port 110 from external machines if UNIX based
shell account (FreeBSD), but not from Win machine from same ip address.
There are no errors or even mention of a connect when the socket error
occurs in the logs. The internal network does not have this problem. I'm
stumped....I've restarted daemons and even rebooted (last resort).
Any ideas????
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 18:14:07 GMT
Does anyone know of a way to have telnet open. I dont want a login.
When you telnet to the linux box your in. Can I specify a TCP port
open?
Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: 14 Jan 1999 21:39:00 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Detlef Bosau)
Crossposted-To:
de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,alt.sex.fetish.linux,at.linux,fido.ger.linux,fido.linux-ger,maus.os.linux,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,de.comp.os.unix.linux.newusers
Subject: Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte am 14.01.99
zum Thema "Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)":
>
> Detlef,
>
> da ich einer von solchen bin, die ihren (vernetzten)
> Linux-Rechner mit ipfwadm geschuetzt haben (oder zumindest
> dachten es gemacht zu haben :-) ), waere ich Dir dankbar, wenn
> Du mir die Referenz auf ein Artikel/Text/Howto geben koenntest,
> in dem beschrieben ist warum ein mit ipfwadm eingerichtetes
> Filter keinen Schutz anbietet.
>
> Gott, was fuer ein langer Satz! :-)
>
> Cheers, alex.
Nun, es ist ganz einfach.
Du kannst mit ipfwadm statische Regeln konfigurieren, z.B. dass externe Rechner
nicht auf die reservierten Dienste (<1024) in Deinem Firmennetz
zugreifen koennen. Umgekehrt kannst Du konfigurieren, dass Deine
internen Rechner nur auf bestimmte, reservierte, Dienste
nach aussen zugreifen koennen.
Du kannst gewisse Ports fuer gewisse Rechner sperren. Aber letztlich nur
statisch.
Nun damit Dein Netz plattzukriegen, ist schon mit einem ganz
simplen Sync-Attack moeglich. Sobald Du auch nur einen einzigen
Port fuer Deine internen Rechner statisch freigibst, kannst Du
von aussen mit Sync-Paketen den Rechner zuballern bis zum Abwinken.
Das mindeste, was eine paketfilternde Firewall koennen muss,
ist, Dein Netz komplett fuer Rechner von aussen abzuriegeln und bei
Zugriffen nach aussen z.B. die fuer die TCP Sitzung erforderliche
Regel fuer die Rueckpakete dynamisch fuer die Dauer der Verbindung
bereitzustellen und danach zu loeschen.
Ich denke mal, dass SYNC Attacks und aehnlich plumpe Dinge die
Probleme sind, die einen auch am meisten beschaeftigen. Das erfordert
beim Eindringling wenig Hirn, das ist plump, das ist dem durchschnittlichen
Hacker gemaess. Aber es kann ganz erhebliche Probleme bereiten. Und schon
solche Attacks kann ein ueber ipfwadm aufgesetzter "Firewall" nicht
mehr abfangen und steht hilflos laechelnd daneben.
Detlef
--
Detlef Bosau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bienroder Weg 79 Tel.: +49 531 303383
D2: +49 172 6819937
38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 303364
>>>> PGP Public Key als Empfangsbestaetigung <<<<
## CrossPoint v3.1 R ##
------------------------------
From: Frank Kuehnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SLOW PPP Connection
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:44:19 -0500
Marc wrote:
> Did you try to use setserial [dev] spd_vhi of spd_hi
>
>
the precise port settings are:
/dev/modem, Line 0, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4
Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000, closing_wait2: infinte
Flags: spd_vhi skip_test
a short summary of the session protocol shows a huge number of fcs errors:
Jan 14 15:16:50 action pppd[717]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Jan 14 15:16:50 action ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/modem at 115200
Jan 14 15:16:51 action chat[719]: send
(AT&F1E0Q0V1&C1&D2S0=0S7=60S19=0M1&M4&K1&H1&R2&I0B0X4^M)
Jan 14 15:16:53 action chat[719]: expect (OK)
Jan 14 15:17:16 action chat[719]: expect (host:)
Jan 14 15:17:16 action chat[719]: 48000/ARQ/V90/LAPM/V42BIS^M
Jan 14 15:17:19 action pppd[717]: Serial connection established.
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 10000
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 10000
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 10000
Jan 14 15:17:20 action pppd[717]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 14 15:17:20 action pppd[717]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Jan 14 15:17:20 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 22 bytes, flags =
f010000
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_dev_stats called<6>ppp: successfully queued
22 bytes, flags = f010000
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap 0
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f010003
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f010003
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f010043
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_dev_stats called<6>ppp: successfully queued
18 bytes, flags = f010043
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 10 bytes, flags =
f010043
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 12 bytes, flags =
f010043
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 18 bytes, flags =
f010043
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set maxcid to 16
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f01004f
Jan 14 15:17:22 action kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 going up for IP packets!
Jan 14 15:17:22 action pppd[717]: Cannot determine ethernet address for proxy
ARP
Jan 14 15:17:22 action pppd[717]: local IP address (deleted)
Jan 14 15:17:22 action pppd[717]: remote IP address (deleted)
Jan 14 15:17:41 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = a8b
Jan 14 15:17:52 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 10 bytes, flags =
f01004f
Jan 14 15:17:54 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 6693
Jan 14 15:17:56 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 1aba
Jan 14 15:18:18 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 7ad8
Jan 14 15:18:18 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 6039
Jan 14 15:18:18 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 2c46
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = c04b
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 24
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = fde
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 1597
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 4234
Jan 14 15:18:19 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 5ac
Jan 14 15:18:20 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 385a
Jan 14 15:18:20 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = ad86
Jan 14 15:18:21 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = ab8b
Jan 14 15:18:22 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 10 bytes, flags =
f01004f
Jan 14 15:18:27 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 8182
Jan 14 15:18:30 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = a876
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = c939
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 7bc1
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = c895
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 35cc
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 1a85
Jan 14 15:18:33 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 622b
Jan 14 15:18:44 action kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = 65c3
Jan 14 15:18:52 action kernel: ppp: successfully queued 10 bytes, flags =
f01004f
I can`t help myself but thinking there is something wrong in the frame
checking scheme????!!!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
