Linux-Networking Digest #944, Volume #9 Tue, 19 Jan 99 23:14:09 EST
Contents:
Re: Local DNS (Matt Kressel)
Re: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem (Clifford Kite)
Disk size req'd for Linux cable modem server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sunforum/NetMeeting compatible software? (Steve Wampler)
Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing? (Edward Vigmond)
[Hylafax] WYSIWIG fax cover sheet generation? ("Der Ubermensch")
Re: WEB search engine ("Olly Segwick")
IP Accounting with IPCHAINS ("Scott Brause")
Re: Samba Troubles (Darren Greer)
Re: slow telnet login in my home-LAN (Raymond Doetjes)
Re: Can't telnet to IMAP daemon's ports ("Olly Segwick")
Re: Setting up RH 5.2 for ip_forwarding (lcs Mixmaster Remailer)
Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP (Matt Kressel)
Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (j)
Re: securing a linux box (Yan Seiner)
Linux to Win95 Null-Modem Connection (jymohqes)
Re: Can I force a route? (Matt Kressel)
Re: Faxserver for winblows client ("Kurt C. Anderson")
Re: IP-masquerading with IPCHAINS--NEED HELP!!! (Malware)
Where's mountd & nfsd (RedHat 5.2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Darren Greer)
Re: smaba & win98 (Matt Kressel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Local DNS
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:35:24 GMT
Olly Segwick wrote:
>
> I've got a Redhat Linux 5.2 server with several Windows and Linux clients.
> The Linux server is connected to the Internet through a modem and the
> clients connect to the Internet through IP masquerading. I want the
> clients to pretend the server is the company's actual email server, ie,
> companyname.com. So they send and receive all email from it, and it sends
> and receives to and from the Internet, and doesn't just act as a router.
> I'd like to also setup a DNS so when *real* dns requests go to the server,
> it goes to the Internet and gets the actual address, EXCEPT for
> companyname.com, which I'd like it to intercept and say "oh it's this".
> Yet companyname.com actually exists out on the Internet somewhere else.
> Then the clients can pickup their mail from companyname.com whether their
> computers (and laptops) are connected internally or elsewhere.
>
> So where should I begin looking? I'd like to maybe start with the DNS
> setup.
For DNS: http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO.html
I've done this already and it works very well. It speeds up net access
as well since frequently used sites are looked up internally very
quickly.
For the mail stuff you should use POP mail (see inetd) and fetchmail.
Fetchmail will retrieve mail from the Internet and the POP server will
let your clients access it from your machine. Note that this introduces
some new risks. Since the server will have to poll the Internet for
mail, someone may snoop the passwords knowing when you do this. Sending
mail is no problem. If you allow it to relay (see "man sendmail", then
search for relay) then you canjust specify the Linux box as the clients
SMTP mail host.
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem
Date: 19 Jan 1999 14:38:42 -0600
Simon Allfrey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Anyone had any success with the
: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem
This modem is listed as a variety of winmodem at
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Disk size req'd for Linux cable modem server
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:53:49 GMT
I am a newbie that want to setup a Linux box. It will serve mainly as cable
modem server/firewall but I would also like to tinker with Linux apps.
I want X, and be able to play with Star Office and compiling tools. I may also
want to have this linux box serve as print server for two other windoze pc.
What size of hard drive would I need / would you recommend?
The machine is a P200MMX with 32MB RAM
Thanks,
Rudy
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sunforum/NetMeeting compatible software?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:15:04 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know of Linux software that implements the
conferencing system standards supported by SunForum
and NetMeeting. I particularly interested in the
sharing/collaborating aspects and whiteboarding.
Thanks!
--
Steve Wampler ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Edward Vigmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:02:05 GMT
bill davidsen wrote:
>
> In article <780ei4$5ht$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Ronald BAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | Did u install NFS on the Linux-machine? If u did, remove it at once !
> | Everyone with win3.1,Win95/98 or even DOS can get rootaccess then. Install
> | SAMBA, but configure it properly, especially the permissions.
>
> Do you have any source for these statements? If they're true, sounds
> like I have to replace Linux with something else ASAP, since converting
> all my clients is not likely or even desirable.
>
> I thought the security bugs were long ago fixed! Or are you reporting
> something which was only true long ago? I haven't see anything from CERT
> on this in recent software...
Make sure you apply any security patches to nfs. This is very important
as I was hacked by this means. Now, hardly a week goes by where someone
doesn't attempt an NFS buffer overflow attack and my machine isn't
exactly high profile. I don't even run a web server or receive mail on
it.
--
Ed Vigmond
Institut de Genie Biomedical, Universite de Montreal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Der Ubermensch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: [Hylafax] WYSIWIG fax cover sheet generation?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:01:53 -0600
Is there a way to generate the postscript fax cover sheets for hylafax with
a WYSIWIG tool?
------------------------------
From: "Olly Segwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WEB search engine
Date: 19 Jan 1999 15:34:15 GMT
htDig is one I believe.
--
Olly Segwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article
<77vn9i$sjk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
> Does somebody know if there is a WEB search engine for LINUX?
>
> We are now using a WEB search engine on M$-NT 4.0 for indexing all sites
> referring to one country, El Salvador. Because of the software prices we
> are looking for an alternative...
>
> Thanks for any hints,
>
> Ernesto
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
------------------------------
From: "Scott Brause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Accounting with IPCHAINS
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:56:04 -0500
I am using IPCHAINS as my firewall. I have a number of machines on an
external network. I am trying to use the IP accounting features to track
packets sent/received from all of these machines on the external network.
They are NOT using the linux box with IPCHAINS as a router.
IPCHAINS does not seem to report any packets sent received if they are
not homed on an interface card on the machine that linux is running on.
Has anyone been down this road. Any responses are appreciated.
Scott
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Greer)
Subject: Re: Samba Troubles
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:33:57 GMT
On 18 Jan 1999 15:37:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benjohn007) wrote:
-->I know the answer to the first part.
-->it is because NT SP 4 uses password encryption. you have to disable this in the
-->NT registry. there is a file included with the samba packages called *.reg
-->that'll do this for u. also check ur smb.conf file and look for the line that
-->talks about encryption
Or alternatively you can enable encryption in smb.conf, as opossed to
disabling encryption in NT. There should be a line in your smb.conf
file that says: password encrypt = no
Change that to: password encrypt = yes
DrGreer
------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: slow telnet login in my home-LAN
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:23:17 +0100
You should add an extra line in /etc/hosts
with the name of your Windows machine and its ip address
f.i.:
192.168.1.1 windows
Raymond
Sebastian Koball wrote:
> I�m using a two pc-home-network, one pc with linux, the other one with with win 95,
>if i ping the pc each other all works fine. but if i try to connect from the
>windows-machine to my linux box i have to wait for a long time. after getting the
>connection all is ok and the connection is really fast. the same happens if i try to
>connect to the apache-web-server on my linux-server. it works but all acts very slow.
>the ip of the linux-pc is 192.0.0.1 and the ip of the win-pc is 192.0.0.4, netmask is
>set to 255.
> 255.255.0.
> please help. where is the mistake ? what can i do that my network-connection speeds
>up.
> thank you very much
> bastian
------------------------------
From: "Olly Segwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't telnet to IMAP daemon's ports
Date: 19 Jan 1999 15:30:14 GMT
Oops, I forgot to mention the jist of it: I'm kicked out of the telnet
session immediately w/o the chance to enter any input. I get this
regardless of where I'm telnetting from (either client or locally on the
server).
--
Olly Segwick
Olly Segwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<01be43ba$01005690$cc34dea1@cbcgren023103>...
> I installed the IMAP daemon that comes with Redhat 5.2. To test it I try
> to telnet to the Imap, Pop3, and Pop2 ports.
>
> % telnet localhost 110
> IMAP vwhatever blah blah blah
> Connection disconnected by foreign host
> % _
>
> Any ideas?
> Thanks
> --
> Olly Segwick
>
>
------------------------------
Date: 19 Jan 1999 20:40:04 -0000
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up RH 5.2 for ip_forwarding
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:03:17 +0800 Rodney Hendricks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> What do I put in my /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward file to enable
>> ip_forwarding. I have a handy text editor, joe, for editing this.
>>
>> Also, it appears that one of the rc script files is set up to read this
>file.
>> Do I need to do anything more to this file?
>
>Just stick a 1 in it, and ip_forwarding will be activated.
>
>You may need to do this every time you boot, or place a line in one of
>your start-up files like:
>echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.
Do you also have to recompile (first)?
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:20:33 GMT
Paul Nolan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am a complete newbie to the Linux World and have Red Hat 5.0. My setup
> is as follows
>
> a 486DX266 running Linux
> a Pentium 200 MHZ running Windows95
>
> I very simply want to network these two machines (telnet, ftp etc..) via
> PPP on the
> Serial ports (using a Null Modem connection).
>
> I am familiar with Samba etc..I just dont know where to start. The FAQ's
> tend to concentrate on ISP connection etc..
>
> Is it possible ??
>
SAMBA is NOT necessary..
Yes, it is possible. Set up pppd to use the null modem port on both
ends. Make sure to NOT use hardware flow control (use software if
necessary) since you do not have control lines. Also, you need to
adjust the routing tables after the connection is made to tell each CPU
to connect to the other through the ppp interface. Something like this
would best be started in an init script if you do it often.
Also, you want the IPs to be static so do NOT use the "dynamic" option.
See "man pppd" and look for configuring it for your null modem port
(/dev/cua?)...
HTH,
Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (j)
Subject: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:33:44 GMT
The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks.
Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...
Now you may try to defend Linux by saying that it has more
"flexibility" - but quite frankly we could do with a lot
less "flexibility" and a lot more simplicity. I'll bet
that 95% of users just want to tie into a local NT server
or use Linux AS a file/print server for Winders PCs.
I think that "flexibility" is just an excuse - a euphamism
for "a bunch of really unsophisticated little utilities
written with no real plan in mind by people with a fetish
for cryptic poorly-documented command-line parameters and
well-hidden config files". As is, Linux is a user-UNfriendly
mirror of MSDOS - and that goes double for "connectivity" issues.
Want cheap PC networking & connectivity ? One "L" word comes
to mind and it's NOT "Linux" - try "LanTastic" instead.
Now Linux IS relatively compact and fast and DOES get past
some of the old buggaboos inherent to DOS-derived systems,
but Linux just isn't "ripe" yet. It needs DUN boxes and
"Network" panels which HELP you with things and show all
the pertinent options and conflicts right there.
Someone could make a LOT of money if they could put together
a turn-key Linux-based file/print server package which could
autoconfigure most things and be really easy and helpful on
the rest. Something you take out of the box and 20 minutes
later you have a good working server. You can do that with
Winders, but not with Linux unless you apparently have put
in a tremendous number of obsessive hours.
Now you thought I was just gonna flame ... nope. I've been
relatively polite and realistic here. There are MANY issues
to address, MANY refinements to be made before Linux becomes
a really good option for administrators of small/medium networks.
As much as I dislike Winders, it's a positive relief to boot
back into it after fooling around for hours in vain with Linux.
Preferring Winders to ANYTHING ... IMHO that's a pretty severe
indictment. Linux has been badly over-sold. If it weren't so
cheap it would be a rip-off ... a hobby OS masquerading as
the "real deal".
------------------------------
From: Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: securing a linux box
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:22:34 -0500
Thanks for all the advice. My first attempt at security knocked everyone
off the network... A real secure system :-o
I now have a somewhat different problem: I am trying to connect to my
network across the internet. I can do so by opening up the netbios ports in
the firewall, and relying on tcpd and samba to prevent unauthorized access.
This scares me, as any info would flow accross the internet unencrypted.
I can't prevent access via hosts.deny and allow very well, as one of those
who needs to connect is on aol, and allowing .aol.com access to my network
gives me the shivers.
What are my risks with this? Is it something I should forget doing? How
can I secure the netbios ports?
Yan
------------------------------
From: jymohqes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux to Win95 Null-Modem Connection
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:37:18 -0600
Can I send file between Windows 95 and my Linux box via a null modem?
If so how? I'd like to be able to dial-up to my ISP on one and have
both be able to acces the internet. Is this possible? Any help would be
GREATLY aprreciated.
Thanks,
Jon Striley
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I force a route?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:54:45 GMT
Jonathan Johnson wrote:
>
> First of all, please pardon me if this has been covered, but my newsreader
> shows over 1800 threads and I don't want to read them all... Z-)
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to force network packets to take a certain
> route through 'net land.
>
> Reason is, I am having trouble accessing certain websites when I connect via
> PPP (POTS dialup, 28,8k modem) thru my local ISP (download speeds
> less than 10 bytes/sec). When I connect via my other ISP (long distance,
> but they give me a UNIX shell), I have no trouble getting these sites,
> they download like a breeze.
>
> It is website-specific, not an intermittent thing that can be traced to
> my phone line. It isn't browser specific either, 'cause I get the same
> results with Netscape 4.05, Lynx, Netscape on Windows computer, etc.
>
> SO....is there a way I can force the packets to travel thru some other
> network points so I can view these sites without paying for a long-distance
> modem call?
>
> Specs: Linux kernel 2.0.18 (I think), Redhat v5.0, PPP/28,8k modem
>
> I guess I could whine and complain to my local ISP, too...waaaaah!
>
When dialing into your local ISP you must go through their router. Look
at the command "traceroute" and run "tracroute www.slowsite.com" to see
where the bottleneck is.
HTH,
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: "Kurt C. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Faxserver for winblows client
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:33:39 -0600
got hylafax and then the trouble begins. the install requires ghostscript
upgrades, but they all have "conflicts with . . " or "requires . . . >= . .
" talk about pull your hair out!
--
Kurt C. Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Lawrence Poon wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi there,
>
>Try http://www.hylafax.org
>
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: IP-masquerading with IPCHAINS--NEED HELP!!!
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:15:45 +0100
Hi Raymond,
you wrote:
> I Advice you to use the SuSE masq scripts because they do work!!! ALready from
>version 5.0
> up.
> I have never used ipchains. You should probabaly use ipfadm to open up your firewall
>and
> masquerdading before using ipchains.
ipchains is a replacement for ipfwadm not an addition so he can not use
ipfwadm.
> Name: vcard.vcf
> vcard.vcf Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
> Encoding: 7bit
> Description: Card for Raymond Doetjes
Please turn of this sh***y appendix.
Malware
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Where's mountd & nfsd (RedHat 5.2)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:04:23 GMT
All, I've successfully installed Linux RedHat 5.2 on two PCs. After setting
up Samba to connect a Win 98 box no problems I was going to try and setup NFS
between the 2 Linux boxes, but to my surprise I don't have mountd nor nfsd in
\etc\sbin or \etc\bin. I installed Linux using defaults options which I
thought would include NFS as well. I can ping each other and can telnet one
another so TCP is not a problem. Using ps aux indicates Portmapper is running
but when I run rpcinfo -p all I get is two instances of rpcbind to port 111.
So what's the problem? Why is mountd & nfsd not installed? I assume it was
never installed in the first place? If so how do I install it - are they in a
rpm package? Any info would be very much appreciated.
Timbo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Remove XXXX)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:49:14 -0600
From: Darren Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
You know....I dont see what the point of these anti-Linux posts are. If
you people dont like the way linux does something......either fix it
(its open source), or dont use it. If you have actually ever worked in
an environment where NT is used as a server, and then switch to an
environment where *nix is used as a server, you would never post such a
message. In a production environment, with consitancy, stability,
quality, and countability are important......NT will _not_ do. Being
able to create a file share in a few minutes, does not mean superior
networkign capabilities. Just cause something is easier to set up does
not mean it is better. Take PPP for example. Setting up a PP
connection in Windows take only seconds to do. However, you will get
better transfer rates through *nix. Why? Because Windows has so much
overhead, you have to purchase external utilities to hack into your
registry to fix things. With a company that releases a "new" OS, and it
turns out to be almost nothing but a "bug fixed" edition, how can you
argue?
DrGreer
j wrote:
> The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
> unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks.
>
> Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
> couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
> locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
> Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...
>
> Now you may try to defend Linux by saying that it has more
> "flexibility" - but quite frankly we could do with a lot
> less "flexibility" and a lot more simplicity. I'll bet
> that 95% of users just want to tie into a local NT server
> or use Linux AS a file/print server for Winders PCs.
> I think that "flexibility" is just an excuse - a euphamism
> for "a bunch of really unsophisticated little utilities
> written with no real plan in mind by people with a fetish
> for cryptic poorly-documented command-line parameters and
> well-hidden config files". As is, Linux is a user-UNfriendly
> mirror of MSDOS - and that goes double for "connectivity" issues.
>
> Want cheap PC networking & connectivity ? One "L" word comes
> to mind and it's NOT "Linux" - try "LanTastic" instead.
>
> Now Linux IS relatively compact and fast and DOES get past
> some of the old buggaboos inherent to DOS-derived systems,
> but Linux just isn't "ripe" yet. It needs DUN boxes and
> "Network" panels which HELP you with things and show all
> the pertinent options and conflicts right there.
>
> Someone could make a LOT of money if they could put together
> a turn-key Linux-based file/print server package which could
> autoconfigure most things and be really easy and helpful on
> the rest. Something you take out of the box and 20 minutes
> later you have a good working server. You can do that with
> Winders, but not with Linux unless you apparently have put
> in a tremendous number of obsessive hours.
>
> Now you thought I was just gonna flame ... nope. I've been
> relatively polite and realistic here. There are MANY issues
> to address, MANY refinements to be made before Linux becomes
> a really good option for administrators of small/medium networks.
> As much as I dislike Winders, it's a positive relief to boot
> back into it after fooling around for hours in vain with Linux.
> Preferring Winders to ANYTHING ... IMHO that's a pretty severe
> indictment. Linux has been badly over-sold. If it weren't so
> cheap it would be a rip-off ... a hobby OS masquerading as
> the "real deal".
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: smaba & win98
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:47:08 GMT
rbrewer wrote:
>
> My win98 machine sees the samba drive on my linux machine but always asks
> for a password which never works. I log onto the win machine with the same
> login and password as my linux machine (i.e.-root, "pwd"). I feel that there
> is something wrong on the win machine with tcp/ip setup but have gone
> through every setting with no luck. I have tried deleting the pwl files and
> restarting, etc. Any help would be appreciated. I recently changed from
> slackware to redhat 5.0 to avoid all the hassles of setting up ppp, network
> card and graphics. This seems like deja vue but that's what newsgroups are
> for.
> Thanks
In the samba docs directory (usually /usr/doc/samba-???) look at the
file "ENCRYPTION.txt". Win98 and WinNT enable encrypted passwords, but
Samba defaults to plain text. You need to enable encryption in Samba,
an easy task if you read the docs :)
HTH,
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
