Linux-Networking Digest #979, Volume #9 Sat, 23 Jan 99 20:13:46 EST
Contents:
Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections? (Edd Stanley)
Re: >>> Subscribe me to this newsgroup <<< (Mark Cooperstein)
Interface Activating and Deactivating ("Daniel Goh")
LinkSys (RYBCZYNSKI GREGORY)
Re: Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections? (Benjohn007)
remote access to a samba server (Andy Skunza)
Re: Samba Setup (Benjohn007)
Re: Multiple 3c509 (Sandy Culver)
NFS Problems ("Don Cook")
Re: I need a good proxy server ("Glen Parker")
Re: rc.firewall.ipchains causes slow connections (Ron Forrester)
Re: Boot Rom (Stefan Nehlsen)
Re: DynIp and Linux (Benjohn007)
Samba 2.0 and Kerel 2.2-final (Nazeeh Amin)
Re: Printing on EPSON Stylus 740 very slow (Bob Tennent)
Re: Slower ppp connect time with Linux than with Windows95? (Dan Birchall)
Re: Linux --> Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: Linux-Linux networking problem (Jesse Hughes)
Cable Modem US Robotics VSP Plus ("VTR News")
Re: rc.local question ("Glen Parker")
Re: Samba over the internet (joey smith)
Re: 3c509 irq & inn News Server (Peter Hernberg)
Re: How do I access mails in Outlook on Linux ("Marc Abrams")
deadlock of Linux ("Erich Weber")
Re: kill connection (Haaino Beljaars)
Re: remote access to a samba server (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server (Mark Roberts)
Re: IPCHAINS package - where is it ? ("Hervey Wilson")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Edd Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:52:25 -0500
I am trying to connect my WIN95 machine and my Linux machine on an
ethernet but I am not able
to Ping, telnet or ftp from either machine to the other. I just wanted
to find out if there is
anyway to diagnose whether or not the Linux ethernet adapter is allowing
connections...
When I do an ifconfig I get this:
==============================================================
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:AA:00:1B:2E:41
inet addr:0.27.46.29 Bcast:0.27.46.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:53 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x270
==============================================================
and my rc.inet1 file is set up like this:
==============================================================
#! /bin/sh
#
# rc.inet1 This shell script boots up the base INET system.
#
# Version: @(#)/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 1.01 05/27/93
#
HOSTNAME=`cat /etc/HOSTNAME`
# Attach the loopback device.
/sbin/ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 lo
# Edit for your setup.
IPADDR="0.27.46.29"
NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
NETWORK="0.27.46.0"
BROADCAST="0.27.46.255"
GATEWAY="0.27.46.1"
# Uncomment the line below to configure your ethernet card.
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} broadcast ${BROADCAST} netmask ${NETMASK}
# Uncomment these to set up your IP routing table.
/sbin/route add -net ${NETWORK} netmask ${NETMASK} eth0
if [ ! "$GATEWAY" = "" ]; then
/sbin/route add default gw ${GATEWAY} netmask 0.0.0.0 metric 1
fi
# End of rc.inet1
==============================================================
I just wonder why the heck I can't ping Linux from the WIN machine. Both
lights on the hub are
on and I have the /etc/resolv.conf , /etc/host.conf and the /etc/hosts
files all set up. I even
checked out the /proc/net/dev and it gave me this:
Inter-| Receive | Transmit
face |packets errs drop fifo frame|packets errs drop fifo colls carrier
lo: 73 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0
eth0: 158 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0
What should I do?
THANKS!!!
Edd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re: >>> Subscribe me to this newsgroup <<<
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 22:05:38 GMT
In article <78d4nj$b2m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Temp Account
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wish to subscribe on this newsgroup
>Please put me your list.
>Thanks a lot.
>
>Donnie.
Easy enough done. Subscription is free, but there is an initial sign up
charge. Please send $10 (US) to:
linux.networking Subscription
PO Box 12498
Spring Valley, NY 10977
** Remove ".nospam" when replying or email will bounce back to you...
------------------------------
From: "Daniel Goh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Interface Activating and Deactivating
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:40:57 +0800
Hi,
I'm using RH5.2 and the netcfg for my ppp and eth interfaces. Does any one
know how I can activate and deactivate the interfaces from the command line
(actually through dial-in) instead of the graphical X version?
Thanks
P.S. Please reply to email
Regards,
Daniel
------------------------------
From: RYBCZYNSKI GREGORY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LinkSys
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:09:21 -0700
I am experimenting with running a dual-boot OS, and ran into the following
situation.
If I install RedHat 5.2 first, then the ethernet works and the card is
read as a Tulip. If windows is installed, and then the redhat is
installed - the ethernet card does not work. If I install linux first
though, then I overwrite the bootup when windows is installed and cannot
access my boot partition for linux.
The ethernet card I have is in actuality:
A Linksys LNE 100TX Fast Ethernet PCI Adapter
Any help would be appreciated. Please mail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you,
Greg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benjohn007)
Subject: Re: Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections?
Date: 23 Jan 1999 23:36:21 GMT
is it possible to have an address starting with 0 ?????
if so please send me an email
------------------------------
From: Andy Skunza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: remote access to a samba server
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:09:39 -0500
I would like to install a Linux/Samba server to provide file and print
sharing for 25 win95/98 clients. The Linux box would also need to
provide IP Masquerading for the clients. I think I can figure that
stuff out. But what I can't figure out is: How could a remote win95/98
client, once on the internet thru their ISP dial up connection, mount
the Samba share? Also, would a pentium 266 w/ 64MB of ram be enough
machine for these tasks. Thanks for any suggestions.
Andy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benjohn007)
Subject: Re: Samba Setup
Date: 23 Jan 1999 23:37:55 GMT
is the shares are set correct u should be able to see them. it might be a good
idea to actually include the share part of ur smb.conf in the posting
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sandy Culver)
Subject: Re: Multiple 3c509
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:58:18 GMT
Regarding conflicts with sound and 3c509s: I had serious problems with
5.1 and sound but had no probing or compiling to do with 5.2....sound
just worked.
The 509s have been through a few edits of conf.modules but show up
without any lilo editing....I to tried the append comments you quoted
and they didn't work.
Soon I will test if indeed being tagged 1 and 2 will both cards work
when my new cable service arrives.
I am still stuck not gettting Samba working.
Sandy
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 22:14:24 -0700, "Kyle Bowerman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How did you get it to detect the second card?
>Do you edit Lilo?
>
============================================
Mr.Sandy Culver fax: (978) 623-0082
HR Consultant office: (978) 623-0942
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================================
------------------------------
From: "Don Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS Problems
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:25:19 -0600
I setup my pentium using the Server install from RedHat 5.2
I think I have all the host files and export files set correctly, but I get
RPC errors when a try and install Redhat on a workstation connected via
ethernet to this server.
I even tried showmount -e from the server console and got the error
rpc mount export: RPC: Timed Out
So I think it's a NFS server config problem.
Don Cook
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Glen Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I need a good proxy server
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:39:39 -0800
>Well, I (finally) got my ethernet cards working (both of them). Now I
>need a proxy server for my home network. If one of you gurus could
>reccomend one, I would appreciate it. I need one with the following
>features http (duh!), pop, and tcp and udp bridge proxying. Easy setup
>would be a plus. Thanks in advance!
Squid. But only use it for caching (http, ftp). Every modern browser
supports a proxy directly. For everthing else, use IP masquerading.
Glen
------------------------------
From: Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rc.firewall.ipchains causes slow connections
Date: 23 Jan 1999 15:35:49 -0800
"Glen Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >I am running the rc.firewall.ipchains script (a very cool contribution
>
> Where do I get it? I'd like to take a look at it.
Search for "rc.firewall" on www.freshmeat.net.
rjf&
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Nehlsen)
Subject: Re: Boot Rom
Date: 22 Jan 1999 13:57:28 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Francesc Guasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>russell clarke wrote:
>>
>> I dont know if this is the appropiate newsgroup. anyhoo I am after the
>> ROM to go in the Boot ROM Socket of my network card. But searches on the
>> Internet have come back with nothing. What type ROM do i need/how much
>> and where can i get it.
>>
>http://www.incom.de
http://www.han.de/~gero/netboot/
http://www.slug.org.au/etherboot/
cu, Stefan
--
Stefan Nehlsen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rechnerbetriebsgruppe Tel.: +49-431-77572-106 FAX: -103
Technische Fakultaet der Christian-Albrechts-Universitaet zu Kiel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benjohn007)
Subject: Re: DynIp and Linux
Date: 23 Jan 1999 23:42:20 GMT
i have it working, but i dont have any scripts that activate the program on
boot, when the ppp connection is made i just run dynipadmin and dynipclient.,
for me i just leave my linux box on, and whenever ppp fails (usually 3-4 days)
i have it set to redial automatically and dynipclient(which always runs) gets
the correct ip of the machine and forwards it to dynip server.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 01:43:39 +0200
From: Nazeeh Amin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba 2.0 and Kerel 2.2-final
hi..
i have Samba installed and it works fine.. except that when i upgraded
to Kernel 2.2pre9 the smbmount fails to mount?! it works when i load
2.0.36.
it gives me this error:
mount error: Invalid argument
Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
using the same command like i used before
smbmount //host/C /mnt
what could that be? please email me since i can't access the news server
very easily :)) thanx a lot for the help!
--
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.
------------------------------
From: r d t@c s.q u e e n s u.c a (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: Printing on EPSON Stylus 740 very slow
Date: 22 Jan 1999 14:04:34 GMT
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:03:04 +0100, Bruno Schmidt wrote:
>
>i have changed my old HP Deskjet 550C against an Epson Stylus 740.
>The Quality is ok but the speed of the Prints from Windows-Clients
>is very slow (15 min for some Rows).
>
Which ghostscript driver are you using? It should be the uniprint driver.
Look at /etc/printcap and /var/spool/lpd/<printername>/postscript.cfg
to see how you're configured. And what do you mean by "Windows-Clients"?
Bob T.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Birchall)
Subject: Re: Slower ppp connect time with Linux than with Windows95?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 04:50:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 19:21:04 GMT, Allan Olesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have installed RH 5.1 and connect to the internet with a Zyxel
>OmniNet+ ISDN. It takes approximately 4-5 seconds to get a working ppp
>connection to my ISP. Under W95 it takes 1.5-1.8 seconds. Anyone who
>knows the reason for this?
I don't use ISDN, but I'm curious whether the delay might be at least
partly due to the fact that the average Linux box is running far more
in the way of Internet daemons and stuff than the average Win95 box.
Fairly few Win95 boxen (if any) run telnet, smtp, ftp, and http daemons;
it's not at all uncommon for an "off the shelf" Linux box to do all that
and quite a few more. If that's the case, it may just be taking that
extra time to do whatever network stuff those daemons require.
But that's really just an off-the-cuff idea.
-Dan
--
Dan Birchall, Haddonfield NJ. Linux, NEC Versa 2000C, Cannondale
"Make sure wheel is correctly attached to bicycle before riding!"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux --> Company NT RAS - Can it be done?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:17:37 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 12:17:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca
> Filipozzi) wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >says...
> >> My company runs an intranet with a Win NT RAS for dialup access. To
> >> connect we have to dial into a third party PPP access network. So
> >> under Win 95 you have a PPP dialup connection with a username/password
> >> AND you have to set up networking to logon to a NT server with a
> >> different username/password after connecting.
> >Is the third-party PPP access network directly connected to your company
> >intranet (i.e. relatively secure) or is it connected to the Internet
> >(i.e. relatively insecure)?
> >If it's the latter, then it sounds like you have a Win NT RAS server
> >directly connected to the Internet. Are you using PPTP? Are you protected
> >by a firewall? These are really important security questions that you and
> >your IS dept. need to answer.
>
> The third party access network is directly connected to my company. It
> is NOT a RAS directly connected to the internet. The Win95 dialup
> networking connectoid that my laptop uses says PPP so I'd have to say
> it's not using PPTP. I'm using a standalone PC to connect to their
> intranet, so I'm certainly not using a firewall! My guess is that they
> probably are on their end but I wouldn't know for sure.... Is that
> germane to my question?
> I'm not asking any of those questions. I know that I can use a plain
> standalone PC running Linux to dialup and connect using PPP to the
> third party access number. But can it then logon to the NT RAS? If so,
> how? You'll note that I said previously that the username/password is
> different for the RAS than for the dialup connection. With Win95, the
> logon to the RAS happens 'under the hood' once you've entered your
> password for the first time...I couldn't find this info anywhere (and
> I've looked!).
Your ability to do this depends on how the dial-up access network is
connected. In other words....
If you dial up and you can ping the mail server, then you may not need to
go through RAS at all. RAS authenticates a user/machine against a Windows
domain/workgroup in order to permit access to shares on the
domain/workgroup. If the only thing you want to do is access your mail,
then you should be able to that using POP/SMTP or IMAP (with username and
password). This depends on your IS group (see below).
If you dial up and you can't ping the mail server, then the RAS box is
acting as a gateway and I don't how you would go about authenticating
against it. Maybe by using Samba as a client. Unfortunately, I haven't
used Samba much so I don't think I can help you if this is your
situation. Sorry.
> I know all about standard protocols thanks!... I was asking how you
> would know which email protocol to use (POP, SMTP, IMAP?) to
> send/receive from this particular Exchange server (apart from trying
> to ask the IS department. That would not be productive. They want
> everyone using their officially sanctioned setup - Win95 and
> Outlook!). And so which email client to try under Linux.
Well, if you had a linux box set up somewhere where it could see either
the packets from your laptop or from the mail server, you could use
tcpdump to sniff the packets and see which protocol is being used.
But I think it would be easier to try POP (receive) and SMTP (send) first
from an different email package on your laptop (or even from Outlook and
set up Internet email accounts). However, if your IS group is really
draconian and want you to use Outlook and Exchange only, they may have
disabled POP and SMTP in Exchange. In which case IMAP is the only choice
you can try. (I believe Exchange uses IMAP as the "normal" channel to
Outlook.)
> I hope I've been more clear in my questions this try!
Sorry about being pedantic in my previous reply.
Hope this helps,
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Jesse Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux-Linux networking problem
Date: 22 Jan 1999 10:00:17 -0500
Mogens Kjaer writes:
> Jesse Hughes wrote:
>>
>> This really looks like hardware problems to me, but remember that all
>> of this works fine when machine 2 is running Win95.
> I've seen hardware problems behaving differently depending upon the
> operating system installed.
> The machine behaved differently, depending upon if win95, win311, or
> linux was running.
> So the fact that it runs under win95 doesn't really say anything.
> I would definitly check especially the cables.
> Have you tried swapping NIC's, cables, hub port, etc. etc. etc?
I switched hub ports and (I think) cables. I guess the next test is
to switch NICs. I'll try that this weekend.
--
Jesse Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/user/jesse/jesse.html
------------------------------
From: "VTR News" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,de.comp.os.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.linux.misc,de.comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Cable Modem US Robotics VSP Plus
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:36:38 -0400
I have a Cable modem US Robotics VSP Plus on my computer. I can't find the
driver that works. The modem part of my Cable modem is a Winmodem, so I
think it will not work. However I only need to setup the Network adapter
part of the cable modem and use another modem to get connected.
Is there someone able to help me ?????????
thanks,
Alain Mazoyer R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Glen Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rc.local question
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:35:20 -0800
>>Can someone tell me how the last 2 numbers in the example address below
work
>>in a network environment?
>>
>>208.252.222.16/27
>this would be the range of address's in the network
>from x.x.x.16 to x.x.x.27
>indicating that 12 nic address' s of this net
>
>get the picture
>
>if it was x.x.x.1/10
>
>there would be 10 nic address's
>
>so if you only have 3 puters in your network
>then you would only require
>x.x.x.1/3
That's not right. First off, there's no such thing as a 3 puter subnet.
Not counting the network and broadcast addresses, you can have 2, 4, 8, 16,
etc...
The /# should be the number of bits in the netmask. ie., /24 represents a
255.255.255.0 mask. That's way more than 24 machines (256 to be exact, 254
to be *really* exact ;-)
Therefore, 208.252.222.16/27 equates to 208.252.222.16/255.255.255.7, which
gives you a range of 249 address, or 208.252.111.0 - .248.
Glen
------------------------------
From: joey smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba over the internet
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 19:27:55 -0500
Thanks for the reply,
However, I may not have access to the ports you speak of. The linux box is
located on a college campus. I would imagine they are using a firewall, and I
have been instructed that a firewall, as a matter of practice, doesn't allow
trafic across the netbios port(s), and that I needed to talk with the firewall
administrator to get this resolved. The problem is this... I have no idea who
this firewall admin. person is/were he is located. My school makes it a policy
to hide the people who might be of the greatest use, especially when it concerns
IT personel. Mainly, I was trying to get information as to the possibility that
another route existed (not via an administrator). I tried your suggestion with
crossed fingers but did not prevail. But you said that no netbios means no
access. The server is there, running. But running behind a firewall. Is this
the end. Or, is there another route? Any more suggestions will be greatly
appreciated. I'm willing to do alot of work to NOT go to the network
administration here (more trouble than its worth usually) so even foolish
suggestions will be seriously considered.
thanks
joeysmith
Glen Parker wrote:
> >I have a Red Hat 5.1 machine running samba flawlessly thus far.
> >However, I want to export a directory across the internet. Three main
> >questions:
> >1) Is there a quick and dirty method of making the directory mountable
> >on another machine (win95) given both machines have a full time
> >internet connection and real ip's. At this level I'm not concerned
> >about security. I just want to get it running and see it work. ie.
> >what else do I need to do/get/configure/??? The samba man pages don't
> >mention doing this as far as I can see.
>
> You shouldn't need to do anything special on the linux end, provided you
> actually have access to the netbios ports and all that. On the Win98, you
> *should* be able to connect by entering
> \\<dns host name>\<share name>
> in the explorer url box. If you can't use a domain name, you could also use
> a raw IP address.
>
> Oh wait, you'll most likely need to turn on password encryption on the samba
> server (man smb.conf to get started). Win98 won't transmit clear-text
> passwords I don't believe.
>
> >2) What are the security issues with method 1) above and how might they
> >be addressed?
>
> >3) If samba won't what will and be readable to a win95 client without
> >$$$added software?
>
> Glen
------------------------------
From: Peter Hernberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c509 irq & inn News Server
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:22:23 -0500
Add the following line to your /etc/lilo.conf:
append = "ether=3,0,eth0"
Your lilo.conf should now look something like this:
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36-4
label=linux
root=/dev/hda3
append="ether=3,0,eth0"
read-only
Peter Hernberg
Yang Lin wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I am a new linux user. I have a 3c509 in my box which irq is 3 (can not
> use 10). When
> start linux, the driver use irq 10. How can I change the irq setting of
> linux?
> Now I have trouble in setup a inn News Server. Wish you can give me
> help.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Yang Lin
------------------------------
From: "Marc Abrams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I access mails in Outlook on Linux
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:21:11 -0800
There is a Microsoft product called Outlook for the Web that runs on the
Exchange server that will allow Linux or other non-Windows hosts to access
Outlook accounts.
marc.
Joseph Kuan wrote in message <78a3pt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Does anyone know is that possible to access my mail account in MS Outlook
>on a WinNT machine from Linux?
>
>
>Joe
------------------------------
From: "Erich Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: deadlock of Linux
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:16:04 +0100
Hello!
I have installed a SuSE Linux with Kernel 2.0.33.
More and more often the whole system hangs and shows the following messages
on the console:
eth1: Oops. Fragment 0 was not accepted (1)
this message repeats very often - sometimes it is interrupted by the
following message:
SCSI aborting command due to timeout: pid 221548, scsi 0, channel 0, id 3
lun 0 0x08 00 29 6d 02 00
SCSI aborting command due to timeout: pid 221548, scsi 0, channel 0, id 3
lun 0 0x0a 00 49 02 00
SCSI aborting command due to timeout: pid 221548, scsi 0, channel 0, id 3
lun 0 0x0a 00 40 57 06 00
I have no other chance than to switch off the computer and restart it.
the configuration of our system is as follows:
eth0 - ethernetcard connects to internet - works fine
eth1 - tokenringcard connects to internal network
eth2 - ethernetcard connects to isdn-router - works fine
The eth1-tokenringcard is from olicom. I'm already trying to get a new
driver for this card up and running.
What confuses me is the fact that the "eth1: Oops" message especially occurs
if somebody (ie me ;-) connects to the Linux-machine over the internet
(therefore through the ethernet-card!). The error occurs after downloading
big files from the ftp-server... How can this affect the tokenring-card????
Bye,
Erich
------------------------------
From: Haaino Beljaars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kill connection
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:28:11 +0100
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, it was written:
> Use a ps -a to display the processes for all terminals. When you find the
> culprit's process ID, use kill -9 [process ID] to kick him off.
>
> Haaino Beljaars wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >When somebody has connected to my machine, a RH 5.2, via telnet or
> >otherwise, and I am not sure that it is a trusted connection, how can I
> >shutdown that connection?
And how do I kill every process of one particular user without going over
every individual PID at the time?
Greetings from Haaino Beljaars
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: HTTP://www.phys.uu.nl/~beljaars/
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: remote access to a samba server
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:37:53 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy,
Not sure what you want to do here.
Your referencing a remote win96/98 client. That client dials
into an
ISP. Then mounts who's Samba share? Where is the Samba share?
Are
you talking of being home and accessing the work network and
wanting
to mount a drive at work which is a Samba share to your home
computer?
d
comp.os.linux.networking
Andy Skunza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>How could a remote win95/98
> client, once on the internet thru their ISP dial up connection, mount
> the Samba share?
Andy Skunza wrote:
>
> I would like to install a Linux/Samba server to provide file and print
> sharing for 25 win95/98 clients. The Linux box would also need to
> provide IP Masquerading for the clients. I think I can figure that
> stuff out. But what I can't figure out is: How could a remote win95/98
> client, once on the internet thru their ISP dial up connection, mount
> the Samba share? Also, would a pentium 266 w/ 64MB of ram be enough
> machine for these tasks. Thanks for any suggestions.
>
> Andy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:28:44 +0000
Try looking at my [incomplete] Linux server guide at:
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com
Includes various bits required for dial-on-demand
Jay Bramble wrote:
>
> Ok, I am a moron when it comes to Linux. Just starting to really use it
> and I need help from all of you Guru's.
>
> I have set up a second machine that is running RedHat 5.2. My first machine
> is a WinSlows 98 machine. I have Samba running with out too much trouble
> (share access, not user access).
>
> My Linux box is a P-166 with 98Mgs of memory (lots of it) and (1) 1.2 Gig
> IDE (NT Server), 85Mg IDE(Root) and (4) 1.5 Gig SCSI-2 drives. /usr,
> /user/local, /home, /arcs.
>
> What I want to do is move my 56k modem to my Linux box and have it be my
> dialup connection. I am using Wingate on my 98 machine now, so my son and
> daughter can use their machines on the net, but I have to start the dial up
> process on my 98 machine.
>
> How can I get Linux to do this automatically?
>
> I know this is a BIG question..........
>
> In case you are interested, I run NT Server on this box too. Dual Boot.
> To play and figure out how to get it to be a DNS, DHCP and RAS box.
> But mainly I use it and my kids machines as a Rendering Farm for a piece of
> RayTrace Animation software called LIGHTWAVE. Using Screamer Net I can have
> 4 CPU's processing the animations instead of just 1 CPU. Really cool and
> FASSSST....
------------------------------
From: "Hervey Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPCHAINS package - where is it ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:33:30 -0800
Thanks Mark,
I found ftp.starshadow.com yesterday but can't connect to that either - I
always get:
421 - Service not available
Not sure what thats all about. Any other suggestions for mirror sites ?
Mark Hahn wrote in message <78da9d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> I'm searching for the IPCHAINS package - I got to
>> http://www.adelaide.net.au/~rustcorp/ipfwchains/ipfwchains.html but all
the
>> links from there appear to be broken. I've also scanned various archive
>> sites as well with no luck. Can someone provider a pointer ?
>
>a little guessing yeilds:
> ftp://ftp.starshadow.com/pub/rustcorp/ipchains/
>
>I infer that Paul Russell tried to move the tree to a US web site,
>which appears to be less than functional...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
