Linux-Networking Digest #46, Volume #10          Fri, 29 Jan 99 16:13:32 EST

Contents:
  Re: DHCP? (mike burrell)
  modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy (Sven ISDN)
  Re: swapon -s returning error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Raw IPX (FtnPatrick)
  Re: PCI Network card problem (Jim Roberts)
  Re: ethernet card setup problems (Marc Jauvin)
  Squid 2.12PATCH2 & ACL Proxy_Auth (Tobias Pirk)
  NT dialing into Linux PPP server negotiation problems (David Hoelzer)
  Bratislava - looking for C++ programmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Netatalk 1.42b (Cameron Moller)
  netware dislikes linux ? (Christophe Zwecker)
  Re: 2.2.0 killed smb??? (Frank Sweetser)
  Control/Monitoring of PPP link via WEB ("Joe")
  need help!!! ("BBQ")
  Re: Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK (Greg Menke)
  Re: Raw IPX (FtnPatrick)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: mike burrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:57:36 GMT

Ya Wen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| Hi, there:

| I am a newbie of Linux but pretty good at Solaris though. Here is my
| question. Is there a way that I can configure to make my Red Hat Linux
| 5.0 to get dynamic IP address as well as other networking info. from a
| Windows NT DHCP server? If so, what should I configure? If you could also
| point me to a web site, that will be very helpful!

look around on sunsite (ftp://metalab.unc.ed/pub/Linux) for a package called
dhcpcd.  it worked for me! :)

-- 
                                               m i k e    b u r r e l l
                                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                               http://mikpos.dyndns.org

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sven ISDN)
Subject: modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:36 +0100

Hi,

I've got a problem with my Intel EthernetExpress Pro 10 Mbit card. If I try
to install the device using modprobe e.g.

modprobe eepro io=0x300 irq=10 mem=dx000

I get the message

/lib/modules/2.0.32/net/eepro.o: init_module: Device or recource busy

Am I doing something wrong? Fact is, that this problems keeps me as busy as
the device or resource pretends to be!

Would you help me?



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: swapon -s returning error
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:17:53 GMT

Mike,

Yes, swapon has been run.  I've flagged the partition as swap, I've added the
proper entry to fstab, i've run mkswap, I've run swapon.  I've done this
before several times with no trouble.  Here is fstab:

/dev/hda3       /        ext2        defaults   1   1
/dev/hda1       swap    swap       0       0
#/dev/hda2      swap    swap
none             /proc    proc        defaults   1   1

I have hda2 commented out so that I can try to get hda1 working properly
first.  Everything looks ok to me, other than an oops due to "unable to
handle paging request."  I'm sure this is because the paging space isn't
being used.  Here's free:

twistdrill:~# free
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:         47152      40568       6584       5656      14148      21344
-/+ buffers/cache:       5076      42076
Swap:        52380          0      52380

This tells me that everything should work, but the swap space is being added
with a -1 priority.  I'm curious, does it matter if the partition which holds
my / filesystem isn't in the first part of my disk?  Here's my partition
table:

Disk /dev/hda: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 1023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   Begin    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1            1        1       26    52384+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda2           27       27       52    52416   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3           53       53     1023  1957536   83  Linux native


I appreciate your response, and will appreciate even more help.

Brad Beck
Network Admin
bjb@don'[EMAIL PROTECTED]









From:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kelly)
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:                Re: swapon -s returning error
Date sent:              Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:13:50 -0500
Organization:           ...

> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:53:01 GMT, in comp.os.linux.networking you wrote:
>
> >I am having trouble getting my swap spaces to work.  My fstab file is ok, I
> >have created the partitions, etc.  When I run swapon -a with no options, the
> >space is added with a priority of -1.  This seems strange to me.
>
> Did you ever run mkswap on the partitions?
>
>
> Mike
>
> "Genius gives birth, talent delivers."
>
>                 - Jack Kerouac
>
> (remove NOSPAM from address, if present, to reply)


============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FtnPatrick)
Subject: Raw IPX
Date: 28 Jan 1999 20:15:59 GMT

I am using Linux Kernel 2.0.34 and I am trying to read RAW IPX packets off of
one of my ethernet cards.

I have a DEC ethernet card using the tulip driver on eth1.  This card is being
used for other purposes.

I have an NE2000 ethernet card using the ne driver on eth0.  This is the card
that I want to read from and write to.

I need to read all packets coming in on this card, both broadcast and those
directed to my IPX address.

I need to write packets from this card, both broadcast and to specific IPX
addresses.

I need to be able to specify the frame type, but would like to reserve the
option of being able to talk and receive on multiple frame types.

I do not need to do any routing.

I would rather not have to have the program run as root.

Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> provided helpful hints about how
to use:

Option 1:
  sk = socket ( PF_INET, SOCK_PACKET, ntohs(ETH_P_ALL) )
  How do I bind this socket to eth0?  Is there a function to get the IPX
address of "eth0" so I can
  fill in the sipx_node field of the sockaddr_ipx structure?
  There is a warning about having to "feature out the interfaces, frame types
and routes settled
  up for IPX".  Please forgive my ignorance, but what functions perform these
configurations?
  When accessing IPX this way, who is filling in the IPX header?  My routines
or the socket
  routines?

Option 2:
  sk=socket ( PF_IPX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0 )
  Same questions as above...

Option 3:
  ethertap device
  have not found references to yet

Option 4:
  libpcap
  have not found references to yet

I am investigating these options and could use any help that anyone could
provide.

FtnPatrick


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: PCI Network card problem
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:28:03 GMT

When you get the LILO prompt, enter linux single to 
get to single user mode. You can log in as root and
correct the problem.
> Hi
> I am using linux slakware 2.0.30 and I made some changes in my
> /etc/rc.d/rc.modues
> (I uncommented the line corresponding to Network card.... ne ...=0xnnn)
> My card is note an ne , it is PCI ethernet acer..ALN201, and is not listed
> there.
> So each time I boot my machine, it freezes when it reach the network card
> probing.
> Is there a way to boot my machine without reading the  /etc/rc.d/rc.modules
> file?
> 
> I tried linux ether=0,0 or other values and I got the same results.
> 
> I tried to boot from a boot/root disk, and I mounted the native linux
> partition
> mount  /dev/hda3  /   -f ext2  -rw
> and wanted to use vi or pico, they were in /usr/bin but wen I could not use
> them (I got the famous error message: no file...or something like this)
> Do you have any answer to these problems.
> 
> Thanks
> Joe Brun
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 
Jim Roberts         Never enough time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Marc Jauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: ethernet card setup problems
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:29:35 -0500

Chris Smith wrote:
> 
> I am trying to get linux to load my ethernet card.  And at several places it
> responds "eth0:  unkown device"
> Also, I don't see a message about it loading when i type "dmesg"  I do have
> the "eth0 eepro100" line in my conf.modules file.  Also the network
> configuration menu in redhat reports the device as inactive.  Then i
> activate it close the window and go back to it and it again says inactive.
> Does anyone know what my problem is?

My guess is that it is not detected by the kernel; have you configured/recompiled your
kernel with the right network interface card?

-- marc

Jealousy is all the fun you think they have.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Pirk)
Subject: Squid 2.12PATCH2 & ACL Proxy_Auth
Date: 29 Jan 1999 21:13:43 +0100

which external auth. programm have i to use?
At this time i tried with ncsa_auth. But Squid doesnt try to authentify and
bring no error messages. I want to give userspecific cache rules, so that i
can use the authentify username as acl (acl xxx proxy_auth user1 user2 ..) .

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Hoelzer)
Subject: NT dialing into Linux PPP server negotiation problems
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:22:49 GMT

Here's the story.  We have a Linux 2.0.34 box running PPPD 2.2 pl 0
connected to a USR modem pool through a set of DigiBoards.  Windows
95, 98, other Unices, Macs, etc can all establish a PPP link
successfully, but NT (version 4 with and without SP 1, 2, and /or 3)
will *not* negotiate successfully.  Here's the process (to save you're
asking)

User dials up (successful)
Prompted for Username (Terminal window after dialing)
Prompted for Password
Successfully logged in, the shell is /sbin/pppd (again, this works for
lots of other systems, just not NT, so I know that this is all
configured correctly so far).
User tells the dial up session to continue
Passes the "Username/Password" check successfully (actually, both pap
and chap are disabled)
Moves on to a mysterious "Registering your computer on the network"
box that is not present in 95 or 98.  At first we thought that perhaps
it was trying to contact a WINS server, but have abandoned that notion
since we are now assigning a WINS server.  Below is the debug log for
PPPD during an attempt to negotiate a connection.  The error returned
is 732.

Thanks in advance!


Jan 29 15:50:13 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x3c4b6114> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:15 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x5579> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:15 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x0 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x5579> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:16 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x3c4b6114> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:25 secure last message repeated 3 times
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x3c4b6114> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> < 81 06 00 00 00 00> < 82 06 00 00 00 00> < 83 06 00 00 00
00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x5579> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x174f2159> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x5579> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x3c4b6114> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure last message repeated 2 times
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x174f2159> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
0.0.0.0> < 81 06 00 00 00 00> < 82 06 00 00 00 00> < 83 06 00 00 00
00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:28 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x3 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05>]
Jan 29 15:50:29 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x2 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:29 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:29 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:29 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:29 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x4 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x5 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:31 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x5 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x6 <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x6 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:34 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x7 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x8 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:38 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x9 <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0xa <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0xa <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0xb <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:42 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0xb <addr
170.129.18.50>]
Jan 29 15:50:44 secure pppd[304]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 17 4f 21
59]
Jan 29 15:50:45 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 00 00 55
79]
Jan 29 15:50:46 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:46 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0xc <addr
170.129.18.50> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jan 29 15:50:46 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x4 <addr
170.129.18.6> < 81 06 aa 81 50 1b> < 82 06 aa 81 50 05> < 83 06 00 00
00 00> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Jan 29 15:50:46 secure pppd[304]: rcvd [IPCP TermReq id=0x5 00 00 02
dc]
Jan 29 15:50:46 secure pppd[304]: sent [IPCP TermAck id=0x5]

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bratislava - looking for C++ programmer
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:39:23 GMT

Hi Slovenska,

wir sind ein Sueddeutsches Unternehmen und wir suchen in Bratislava einen
langfristig fuer uns taetigen C++-Programmierer auf freiberuflicher Basis zur
Entwicklung einer kommerziellen Software unter Windows.

Kommunikation auf Deutsch oder Englisch.

Wir bitten um Ihre Nachricht.
Frank Bauer


============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Cameron Moller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netatalk 1.42b
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:05:03 -0500

Hi,
  I had Netatalk up and running on my box until I recompiled the Kernel
(first 2.1.132 then 2.2.1).  Now when I boot, I get the following
messages

Red Hat Linux release 5.1 (Manhattan)
Kernel 2.1.132 on an i686  (now also Kernel 2.1.1 on an i686 )

smaug login: Too many routes/iface.
AppleTalk not up! Child exited with 1.
bind: Cannot assign requested address
bind: Cannot assign requested address

has anyone seen/solved this sort of problem before??
Any ideas would be appreciated.

Cameron



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christophe Zwecker)
Subject: netware dislikes linux ?
Date: 29 Jan 1999 00:46:17 +0100

Hi,

I just installed a linuxmachine into a novell network with win95
clients. I can't reach linux from the clients, thy don't have an IP
setup. A soon as I give them an IP (Windows Networksetup), I can see
the linuxbox, but the netware login for the winclients is gone - no
more shares , no more printers and so on.

Does anyone have a hint for me how I can get linux and netware work
together without theese glitches ? I appreciate any hint, dunno
anythin about netware unfort.

thx a whole lot. 

Chris
-- 
Christophe Zwecker
Hamburg, Germany                     
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49 40 22715433
sms: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (120 chars, subject only)

------------------------------

From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2.2.0 killed smb???
Date: 28 Jan 1999 15:20:10 -0500

"Jon Horner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Okay, I compiled and installed my new 2.2.0 kernel yesterday.  I tried to
> mount the C: from my //Nt-workstation machine today, and I get:

from the linux-kernel list, this should answer your question.

From: "Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Delbert Matlock)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Alias and smbmount in 2.2.0
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:42:39 -0500 (EST)

Delbert Matlock enscribed thusly:

> Well, I decided to take a risk on upgrading one of my production systems
> (based on RedHat 5.2) to the 2.2.0 kernel.  I compiled the new kernel and
> upgraded any packages in the "Documentation/Changes" file that were
> required.  So far, it looks like there were two serious problems.

> First, "make menuconfig" appears to be fairly messed up in the "Networking
> Options" section.  Many options that could normally be compiled as modules
> can not now, and "IP: aliasing" is missing all together.  It does show up in
> "make xconfig", but there is still the problem with not being able to
> compile most options with modules.

> Next, there appears to be a problem with "smbmount".  Attempts to mount a
> sharename from a NT server produce the following kernel message:

>       SMBFS: need mount version 6

> New versions of samba and smbfs (off of RedHat's rawhide site) don't help
> this at all.

        The smbfs file system with linux 2.1.70 and higher (that includes
2.2.x) requires the smbmount program from Samba.  The smbmount program
from Samba 1.9.x package will not compile on RedHat 5.x and I'm not
supporting ANY bug reports from that version.  Other people have announced
patches to get smbmount from 1.9.x to work on RedHat, but none are supported
and none are going into the 1.9.x source tree, so you pays your nickel and
you takes your chance there.  1.9.x Samba development is totally frozen out
with the Samba 2.0 release.

        Get the samba 2.0 package from www.samba.org and recompile Samba.
When you run configure add the --with-smbmount option.  That will then
generate three programs, smbmount, smbmnt, and smbumount.  Install them
(or install the whole blinken Samba package - it's a good'n).  Installing
on RedHat, there are a couple of patches in the packaging/RedHat that you
might want to apply.

        Here is the order I do things:

        # cd /usr/src
        # tar xvzf samba-2.0.0.tar.gz
        # cd samba/source
        # patch -p2 < ../packaging/RedHat/makefile-path.patch
        # patch -p2 < ../packaging/RedHat/smbw.patch
        # ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-smbmount
        # make
        # make install

        Should give you everything you need.

        NOTE:  The smbmount program syntax has changed!  The old syntax
no longer works.  It's currently on my todo list to work out a compatibilty
mode for the syntax and to get smbmount to cooperate with autofs.  There
are currently OTHER problems with autofs that are higher priority (such as
a $#@$#@ deadly embrace that I'm trying to sort out).

> --dkm

        Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-- 
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net  | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.0        i586 | at public servers
"...very few phenomena can pull someone out of Deep Hack Mode, with two
noted exceptions: being struck by lightning, or worse, your *computer*
being struck by lightning."
(By Matt Welsh)

------------------------------

From: "Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Control/Monitoring of PPP link via WEB
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:11:48 -0500

Hi,

    Before I go off and invent a wheel, I thought I'd ask around
to see if anyone has already done this.  Basically, I'd like to
have the functionality of the USERNET program available to
my home net via the Apache web server running on my
Linux system.  I am IP-masquerading my home network out
to the real internet via PPP to my ISP.  It would be nice for
someone on my net to be able to bring up a web page from
the Linux system which will show the current status of the
PPP interface and also have a button to click on that will
bring the interface up/down.

    If anyone has already done this and is willing to share their
HTML and PERL creations, please either post here or email
me directly at Zawodny -at- Exis.Net (antispam version).

    TIA,

        Joe



------------------------------

From: "BBQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: need help!!!
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 01:16:00 +0800

Dear all,

where can I find the kernel file in Redhat 5.2?


thanks

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Greg Menke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.networking,microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.networking.protocols,microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.general,linux.samba,linux.redhat.misc,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK
Date: 29 Jan 1999 15:28:20 -0500

"Slam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> So you're saying that I must upgrade to Samba v2.0 for Win2k Pro to see the
> shares?
> 
> 
> James Nord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Slam wrote:
> > > 
> > > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0?  Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
> > 
> > I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
> > even after configuring it to do so.
> > 
> > /James
> > 

I think 1.9 will do encrypted passwords, so it should work.  I think its
the same issue as 95/98/NT password encryption.  The man pages and help
files discuss password encryption issues- and there are references to
it on the Samba website.

Gregm

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FtnPatrick)
Subject: Re: Raw IPX
Date: 29 Jan 1999 00:02:36 GMT

NOTE: I am starting to use a pipe from ifconfig to get the IPX address of
"eth0", but would like a function call to do the same thing.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to