Linux-Networking Digest #46, Volume #11 Wed, 5 May 99 06:13:34 EDT
Contents:
Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet (Bill Long)
Re: Proxy server (Rob van der Putten)
Re: connecting two networks w/o a router?? (Bill Long)
Re: RTL8139 problem (Vidar Andresen)
Re: DSL questions (Bill Long)
Re: linux box login (Bill Long)
Re: viewing Linux Xserver Xfree86 on NT ? (Mike)
pppd and isdn (gianluca)
Re: Help with "route" command (Bill Long)
Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet (Wonkoo Kim)
Re: Direct Cable PPP connection between Linux and Win95 ("Bono")
Re: Help me with masquerading, please (Tero Niemi)
Re: IP Load Balancing (Michael Hasenstein)
Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner? ("Walter Harms")
Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner? (Gerd Roethig)
Re: DSL questions ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
RedHat 5.2 and Linksys Combo Cards (TheMerk)
Any tools to format the data from the netlink device??? (Eric Bullen)
Re: 2 NIC in RH, 2 subnet required? (Bill Long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:00:18 GMT
hmm..i have never had anybody hold my hand. i'm no linux expert by any
means, but i dare say my three short years of using is has taught me
more about computers, programming and operating systems than the
previous 6 did(not to mention some college classes).
hand holding is okay to a certain extent. but i dont think it is for
linux. if you want your hand held, go buy windows, or mac. linux was
built by and for people who USE computers. not people who play with
computer or enjoy them as a past time.
it wasnt a brainless remark. it was right on the money.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Tools that hide the inner workings of the system and don't make anything
> > easier should not be used. Editing a file is just as easy as using a GUI
> > tool, and gives a much better [and more portable] understanding of what's
> > going on. If you want your hand held, use some other OS.
> >
> > -Bill Clark
>
> Gee, If this isn't a brainless remark! How will one learn anything w/o hand
> holding!
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Proxy server
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:08:42 +0200
Hi there
On Tue, 4 May 1999, John Smith wrote:
> it tells me it cannot create the directories? anyone has
> any idea?
Check your permissions.
Regards,
Rob
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: connecting two networks w/o a router??
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:48:05 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <7gonj2$pbi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am going to set a Linux box that would be connected to the Internet through
> > a dedicated dialup. It will have a static [class C]
>
> /24, please.
>
> > IP address on ppp0
> > interface. It will be running almost all TCP/IP services including DNS.
>
> So, you will be assigning a public /24 IP address to this machine. Okay so
> far..
>
> > This box will be physically a pat of our ethernet that has class B addresses.
>
> /16, not "class B". The old terminology is supposed to be phased out, being a
> pain in the ass about it is my way of helping to speed up the process.
>
> Anyway, I'm assuming you mean "LAN" when you say "ethernet", and you're
> talking about a *private* network, like 192.168/16 or something similar.
>
> The big question is _how_ is the machine connected to the LAN? If you have
> two network interfaces [one for public, one for private], then your machine
> can be its own gateway. Simply run `routed` or `gated` or some variant.
> There are FAQs that cover this, do a search on the two keywords I just
> mentioned.
>
i gather from your info that you will have a modem as your gateway
device. ie, you are dialing up to your internet provider, then you want
a local lan (using ethernet or token ring) to also be connected to the
linux box but be on a separate network(192.168.x.x).
this is very simple. some things need pointed out however. IF you are
using the linux box to connect other computers to the net and those
other boxes dont have valid, registered, unique ip addresses you need to
set up IP Masquerading on your linux box.(that requires a kernel
recompile). setting up the ip masq stuff is way simple. see man
ipfwadm. if the address on the other boxes ARE unique, registered IP
address, all you need to do is turn on ip forwarding.
> If you only have one network interface, you're screwed. A single interface
> can only be physically connected to a single network, so if you want this box
> to see two networks you need two network interfaces. That means either
> buying a second NIC or a setting up a second machine.
i believe with linux you can use the ip aliasing functionality to use
one device to connect to different logical networks. for instance you
could have one network card be part of two different ethernet subnets.
but, since the network card is plugged into a hub and the hub would then
have to be talking to two different networks, this doesnt make much
sense. it gets kind of fuzzy after that and my poor alcohol imbued brain
starts to spark and crackle.
>
> -Bill Clark
> Systems Architect
> ISP Channel
> http://locale.ispchannel.com/
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: RTL8139 problem
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 03:19:20 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rowan Hughes) wrote:
>I have two RTL8139A clone NICs (brand=Spirit Modems) that don't
>work very well with 2.0.X or 2.2.X drivers. Both drivers recognize
>the cards and give no error messages, and Becker's RTL8139 diagnostic
>test says the card is OK. The card sends/receives a few hundred
>bytes and then locks up for several mins. Both cards have been tried
>on 100B and 10B, full and half-duplex, lines and in several machines,
>all with the same result--it's not a H/W problem. Spirit have told me
>that they've not modified the chipset in any way, except for the PCI ID.
>
>Any ideas?
Output of 'ifconfig'?
The http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html states:
If you encounter Rx overflow errors and transmit timeouts you
likely have the card in a non-bus-master slot. Other possible
problems are older PCI implementations, especially i486-class
motherboards, that have bugs when using long PCI burst transfers.
I have a Accton Cheetah with a Realtek 8139, and the Accton driverdisk
A:\setup\set1207d.txt
Hardware Configuration
======================
*******************************
* 1. Adapter Configuration *
*******************************
The adapter is configured using the host PCI computer's BIOS setup
program. This is done by changing the computer's BIOS setting to
enable bus master mode, and then setting up the IRQ. The procedure
to implement this and the terminology used depend on the BIOS you
are using.
Some BIOS have Bus Master mode enabled for all the motherboard's
PCI expansion slots; others provide you the option of turning this
feature on or off. For example, if your computer uses the Phoenix
BIOS, there is a "Device Select" field where you should input the
slot number of the PCI slot where the adapter is installed, say
"Slot 3 Device". Then for the fields that read as "Enable Device"
and "Enable Master" you should change the settings to "Enable".
The same is true for the adapter's IRQ setting, which is mapped to
the BIOS IRQ setup of the host PCI computer.
Finally, you need to set the Trigger/Routing field to select the
Trigger method by which the IRQ is assigned or routed to the PCI
slot. There are three types of settings to choose from:
* Level/Auto - This is usually the default. Choosing this option
leaves the assigned IRQ free for other use if the installed
card does not use it.
* Level/Forced - If you are not able get the PCI card to work
properly, choose this option. This will assign the specified
IRQ permanently to the card.
* Edge/Auto - Some PCI boards support this option. Do not use it.
And; http://www.realtek.com.tw/cn/doc/8139A.htm
PCI local bus single-chip Fast Ethernet controller
Compliant to PCI Revision 2.2
Supports PCI clock 16.75MHz-40MHz
What is the speed of the PCI-bus? (dont know if that is a problem,
but curious. I have 32MHz on a (couple of) motherboard from 1994. Is
66MHz more common on new machines, dont know.)
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL questions
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:51:29 GMT
so you guys are telling me i'm getting ripped off? if thats the case,
i'll call my ISP asap. being the Guinea pig for them, i suppose has its
drawback. :(
thanks for the info. i'll try to rectify it.
Christopher Segot wrote:
>
> I am thinking about getting ADSL as it has just become available in my
> area. I am looking for recommendations or hints as to what hardware to
> get or how to install and setup my connection .
> ~Chris
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux box login
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:53:42 GMT
>boot: linux single ??
set it up to boot to single user mode on login?
not real sure what you mean here.
Col wrote:
>
> Gday people....has anyone got any idea how to make a linux box login
> automatically???
>
> -Col
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: viewing Linux Xserver Xfree86 on NT ?
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 04:55:58 GMT
Hi,
Sorry not a direct answer to you but more a question to those who are
familiar with MI/X. I think I read somewhere in the docs that MI/X
supports or emulates X11R5. I'm running X11R6 on my linux box of
course so what will that mean for compatibility issues? So far it
seems to run twm, it's default, fine. WindowMaker it doesnt seem to
like to much.
Thanks
Mike
On Mon, 03 May 1999 00:45:07 +0100, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is it possible to view Linux Xwindows on a NT box. using an equiv app
>to Hummingbirds Exceed but for free. Maybe SuperX.
>
>Linux box arch = Martox Mill G200 Video Card using SuSE.
>NT box = Savage 3D Video Card.
>
>Connection via DEC Ethernet card 10/100
>
>Many thanks
>
>Matt
>
------------------------------
From: gianluca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd and isdn
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 10:54:44 +0200
I have an isdn connection to an isp
And I have an external robotics TA
They used to have login connection...
so I used vt120 protocol for the ta ... .send the server login and
password and ppp session started....
they don't have this kind of connection anymore :(((((
The all thing works with window...
so I tried to look in the log with no luck...
Remote access sends the same configuration parameters I do... (even
tried to cut and paste them ...)
I get
>May 4 16:20:49 scilla pppd[641]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
In windows the all thing works regardless if I use LCP extentions or not
...
Whats wrong ?
probably some options in pppd
but I couldn't figure out what (yet)
this is my /etc/ppp/options ... that seems pretty close to what windows
does ...
lock
crtscts
defaultroute
noipdefault
ipcp-accept-local
Since I do not use windows I'm back to regular modem connection :-((
thanks in advance
gianluca
please drop me a a mail .... leaving nojunk away from address
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with "route" command
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:52:00 GMT
why do you have a netmask of 255.255.254.0 on eth1?
Wai, Fai, Yee wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I had to rebuild my system over the weekend and I though I have all
>
> the necessary networking files under /etc backed up but I was mistaken. I
>
> have re-installed Linux 5.2 and I cannot get the 2 ethernet cards on this
>
> one system to ping itself - let alone pinging other computers (I was able
>
> to do IP masquerading before I did the rebuild). I watched the screen as
>
> the system boots and the two network cards were found and the correct MAC
>
> address reported by Linux. I think it has something to do with a file in
>
> /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1(?) which sets up the routing info and got blown away
>
> when I rebuilt the system. I have tried various "route" commands to no
>
> avail. I have included my "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -rn" output. Can
>
> someone show me the right "route" command to use (I did a search on
>
> www.dejanews.com and I did not find something that I could use). Thanks for
>
> your help!.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
>
> BROADCAST LOOPBACK MTU:3584 Metric:1
>
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:46:A5:42
>
> inet addr:24.1.239.235 Bcast:24.1.239.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>
> RX packets:1762 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>
> TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>
> collisions:0
>
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6100
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C8:EE:D4:62
>
> inet addr:192.168.125.3 Bcast:192.168.125.255
>
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>
> collisions:0
>
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x240
>
> ======================================================================
>
> ernel IP routing table
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
>
> Iface
>
> 192.168.125.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
>
> eth1
>
> 24.1.238.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 1500 0 0
>
> eth0
>
> 0.0.0.0 24.1.238.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
>
> eth0
>
>
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
From: Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 22:41:15 -0400
Disabling telnetd is definitely not an option for me, because
I have to telnet to the Linux box from other PCs in my home LAN.
(The Linux box has no monitor!)
Someone kindly mailed me with a sample file of ipfwadm rules.
Thanks.
//-------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "Bono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Direct Cable PPP connection between Linux and Win95
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 18:01:39 +0900
Thanks for your advice and I made sure the cable as you described.
However, no difference at all.
It works fine between win95s but I still can't connect to Linux box.
Rob van der Putten ��(��) �������� �ۼ��Ͽ����ϴ�...
>Hi there
>
>
>On Tue, 4 May 1999, Bono wrote:
>
>> 9 pin female sockets are used for both machines.
>
>Allways check your hardware;
>
>Null Modem cable:
>
>RXD--------\ /--------RXD
> X
>TXD--------/ \--------TXD
>
>RTS--------\ /--------RTS
> X
>CTS--------/ \--------CTS
>
>DTR--------\ /--------DTR
> X
>DSR--*-----/ \-----*--DSR
> | |
>DCD--+ +--DCD
>
>GND---------------------GND
>
>The screen of the cable should be connected (soldered) to the connector
>shell at both ends of the cable.
>
>
>For a 9 ping plug this is;
>
> 5 4 3 2 1
> -----------------
> \ o o o o o /
> \ o o o o /
> -------
> 9 8 7 6
>
> DB9 Female
>
>
> 2 --------\ /-------- 2
> X
> 3 --------/ \-------- 3
>
> 7 --------\ /-------- 7
> X
> 8 --------/ \-------- 8
>
> 4 --------\ /-------- 4
> X
> 6 --*-----/ \-----*-- 6
> | |
> 1 --+ +-- 1
>
> 5 --------------------- 5
>
>> mgetty works partially. I can see login message but It stops after I
enter
>> passsword.
>
>Did you set the correct host type in windows?
>Did you set up mgetty + pppd correctly?
>
>> getty works well.
>
>> pppd ???????????????
>
>You could start pppd without mgetty. This works fine with 2 Linux boxes
>(leased line mini howto) but would probably confuse windows.
>
>
>Regards,
>Rob
>
>+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
>+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
------------------------------
From: Tero Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Help me with masquerading, please
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 12:04:52 +0300
Paul Black wrote:
> Tero Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I got linux server as an proxy-server and Masquerading is on. It has
> > two ethernet cards of which eth0 is the outside IP and eth1 connects to
> > hub with three windows machines (192.168.3.2-4). Internet works
> > quite fine, but I cannot for example ping from the LAN machines to
> > the outside world. Could someone give me a little push here?
>
> Is forwarding enabled in the kernel (i.e. compiled in and turned on at
> boot time)?
>
> Paul
Yeap, it really is. Now I can ping from the ethernet to the outside world
but not vice versa. I have a little nameserver which states our machines as
for example mach1.alias.fi, mach2.alias.fi and so on... You cannot ping
from outside.
--
- Dark Vader -
Master of darkness
------------------------------
From: Michael Hasenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Load Balancing
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 09:48:32 +0200
Curt wrote:
>
> My mistake. I'm not sure why I recalled it having something to do with the
> 2.2 kernel. Guess I should have re-read it. It is a good document,
> regardless.
Well, I sure like publicity ;-)
--
Michael Hasenstein
http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/~mha/
Private Pilot (ASEL) since 1998
------------------------------
From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: 5 May 1999 09:04:12 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Loepsinger) writes:
>> wer kennt ein Programm, das mir Zugriff auf einen DOS-Rechner �ber dessen
>> serielle Schnittstelle erm�glicht - w�hrend andere Programme auf dem
>> Rechner laufen?
>>
>> von mir ben�tigte Funktionen sind:
>> (a) Betrachten von Verzeichnissen auf dem DOS-System (DOS-Befehl DIR)
>> (b) Abrufen von Textdateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl type)
>> (c) L�schen von Dateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl delete)
>m��te mit einer TCP/IP-Installation zu machen sein. Hol dir mal das
>KA9Q Paket.
pctcp kommt mit einem ftp-server. das koennte sein
was ihr sucht.
walter
--
=====
"Try and use your intelligence, man, even if you are a politician!"
=====
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerd Roethig)
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:55:49 GMT
Hallo,
Am Mon, 03 May 1999 23:16:03 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ingo Ciechowski) :
>wer kennt ein Programm, das mir Zugriff auf einen DOS-Rechner �ber dessen
>serielle Schnittstelle erm�glicht - w�hrend andere Programme auf dem
>Rechner laufen?
>
>von mir ben�tigte Funktionen sind:
>(a) Betrachten von Verzeichnissen auf dem DOS-System (DOS-Befehl DIR)
>(b) Abrufen von Textdateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl type)
>(c) L�schen von Dateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl delete)
Ist der Rechner, mit dem Du zugreifen willst (ich sag mal jetzt kurz
Client dazu) ein DOS-Rechner, k�nntest Du LapLink, PC Anywhere f�r DOS
bzw. Lap2Desk ausprobieren.
Gerade letzteres ist interessant: Du l�dst auf beiden Rechnern einen
Treiber (TSR), die Laufwerke des DOS-Rechners erscheinen nach
einmaliger Zuordnung durch das Programm L2DMAP.EXE auf Deinem Client
als zus�tzliche Laufwerke und lassen sich mit den DOS-Befehlen normal
ansprechen. Das funktioniert teilweise sogar mit nebenher auf dem
DOS-Rechner laufenden Programmen.
Leider wei� ich nicht, wo man das Programm heute noch her bekommt
(vermutlich zu alt...).
>Ich w�re ggf. auch geneigt, die Entwicklung in Auftrag zu geben...
Wie gesagt, wegen des fehlenden Multitaskings unter DOS ist ein
Zugriff auf den DOS-Rechner bei gleichzeitig laufenden anderen
Programmen nicht immer sichergestellt. Abhilfe: Einen
Multitaskingaufsatz (DesqView, Windows 3.1) oder ein DOS mit dieser
Funktionalit�t verwenden (aktuellstes Caldera OpenDOS AFAIK).
Da Du auch in Linuxgruppen gepostet hast, w�re auch noch eine
M�glichkeit denkbar: DOSemu unter Linux auf dem DOS-Rechner (wenn
Deine Software damit l�uft).
Eine weitere M�glichkeit bietet die Installation des Workgroup-Addons,
wie in einem anderen Posting erw�hnt, f�r DOS. Hier mu� dann
allerdings NET.EXE gegen eine Version ausgetauscht werden, die
Filesharing auf dem DOS-Rechner unterst�tzt. Diese Version kennt dann
die zus�tzlichen Befehle NET START SERVER bzw. NET SHARE .
Zun�chst brauchst Du hierf�r also auf dem DOS-Rechner dieses
Workgroup-Addon:
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/Clients/MSCLIENT/DSK3-1.EXE
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/Clients/MSCLIENT/DSK3-2.EXE
Es folgt ein Zitat aus:
http://x12.dejanews.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=367379511&CONTEXT=925894140.22347809&hitnum=5
(Message-ID: <6nadvt$3bh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
Der Client bietet aber keine M�glichkeit, Verzeichnisse freizugeben.
Dazu brauchst Du noch zwei Patches:
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/mslfiles/nnet.exe
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/mslfiles/netshar.exe
Beide Dateien in das Verzeichnis entpacken, in dem der Client
installiert ist (normalerweise C:\NET, vorhandene Dateien
�berschreiben
lassen).
Schlu�endlich m�ssen noch in C:\NET\SYSTEM.INI die Zeilen
filesharing=no
printsharing=no
manuell in
filesharing=yes
printsharing=yes
ge�ndert werden. Falls Du sp�ter das Setup nochmal aufrufst, um die
Einstellungen des Client zu �ndern, wird hier wieder "no" eingetragen,
also wieder von Hand �ndern.
Dann darauf achten, da� SHARE.EXE in der autoexec.bat geladen wird.
Jetzt kannst Du den Server mit
net start server
starten und �ber netshare.exe Verzeichnisse und Drucker freigeben.
Ich habe allerdings festgestellt, da� dieser "Server" sehr langsam
ist.
Ich habe nur 60 KB/sec. �ber ein 10MBit-Netzwerk geschafft.
Zitat Ende.
Mit dieser Software solltest Du auch von Linux aus �ber TCP/IP auf den
DOS-Rechner zugreifen k�nnen (sollte mit smbmount funktionieren).
Allerdings ist die Verf�gbarkeit des DOS-Servers von der Aktivit�t der
sonst noch laufenden Programme abh�ngig. Je nach Programm funktioniert
der Server nicht oder nur von Zeit zu Zeit.
Ciao
Gerd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DSL questions
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:57:46 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi) wrote:
> Yikes. I have ADSL and it costs $65.00/month (taxes extra) and I get
> nearl 3.2Mbps down.
Bell Atlantic has the best I've seen yet: 7.5Mbps bi-directional, for around
$110/month, last time I checked.
Unfortunately, I'm in PacBell country myself. I pay that price for only
384Kbps upstream, 768Kbps downstream. I hate PacBell.
-Bill Clark
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TheMerk)
Subject: RedHat 5.2 and Linksys Combo Cards
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 02:51:29 GMT
i have 2 linksys combo cards, one is a pci and the other is a pcmcia,
i cant seem to find a way to get linux rh 5.2 that is to use the bnc
connector and not the 10BaseT, my main goal it to do a network
install on to my notebook that has a small hard drive, but I would
like to get them both back up on my network, the network is a peer to
peer based lan using 2 pc's, a couple of T-connectors and some coax.
lan works great in 98 and Nt.
thanks in advance,
TheMerk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Bullen)
Subject: Any tools to format the data from the netlink device???
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 02:52:09 GMT
Hello All,
With the below information, I set up the device and I am able to dump
the data to a file (using cp /dev/firewall_dump /fwdump_info), but the
file contains jibberish with very little interesting information. Does
anyone know of any tools to take that data, and reformat it into
something that is readable?
Thanks in advance... :)
-Eric
>>>
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL_NETLINK:
If you say Y here, you can use the ipchains tool to copy all or part
of any packet you specify that hits your Linux firewall to optional
user space monitoring software that can then look for attacks and
take actions such as paging the administrator of the site.
To use this, you need to create a character special file under /dev
with major number 36 and minor number 3 using mknod ("man mknod"),
and you need (to write) a program that reads from that device and
takes appropriate action.
<<<
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: 2 NIC in RH, 2 subnet required?
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:31:51 GMT
what you want do to is:
in your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
there is a file called ifcfg-eth0 which normally starts up your FIRST
ethernet card.
make a second file called ifcfg-eth1 which looks like the first one, but
has the IP numbers for your second card. the way it works is that your
rc files look in the init.d directory and basically start up all
ifcfg-<device><number> files. if i remember correctly, the graphical
setup for redhat(and caldera and slackware of old) doesnt handle the
second interface/device.
its a very simple fix. they do not need to be on two different
subnetworks, though i cant imagine why you would want two on the same
sub network.
then just look at your routing table. make sure you have a gateway(if
you want to get to the net)
when you run ifconfig you should get at least 3 entries.
lo, eth0 and eth1. if you have the ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth1 in the
network-scripts directory and its till not working, make sure you look
at your bootup messages to make sure that BOTH ethernet cards are being
seen. use #dmesg, you should see entries for eth0 and eth1. if your
kernel doesnt see them, you'll need to either recompile the kernel to
include them or recompile the modules and make sure that the depmod -a
is loading the correctly.
hope this helps
Jeffrey Yu wrote:
>
> Hi, I am trying to configure two NIC in my Linux box (RH5.2).
> I assigned two ip for both, ie, 191.191.191.1, 191.191.191.2.
> Now the problem is I can only ping the 2nd NIC (eth1). It
> seems this is a network routing issue. What should I do to
> configure the routing table right? Are these two NC required
> to be from two different subnet, ie, 191.2.0.0 and 191.5.0.0?
>
> Please help!!
>
> --Jeffrey
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
