Linux-Networking Digest #345, Volume #10 Mon, 1 Mar 99 17:13:44 EST
Contents:
Re: Anyone using 3C507 (3Com EtherLink 16)? (J J)
Re: Stupid question about remote shell cammands. (Andreas Peetz)
Re: Streaming audio over IP. (Alexander Atkin)
Re: X Terminal setup - HP EnvizeX (Jan Just Keijser)
Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Clifford Kite)
Re: Connetcing to NT RAS with linux (Clifford Kite)
Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ?? (JoHn DoH)
Re: connecting 2 pc for file transfer (Alex Yung)
Re: static IP's (Aris CRuz)
drivers for de-528ct (Andr� Johansson)
Re: dls faster in Windows!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
klogd, syslogd, and top question, help? ("Scott MacDonald")
Re: Router on peer-to-peer lan? (Bob Emes)
Netgear on 486? (Derek Fountain)
Re: domain name reg and IP setup (gus)
Re: Using XDM inside VNC (Andreas Peetz)
Re: remote printing (Alexander Smondyrev)
Re: Where can I get ipautofw? ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ?? (Alex Yung)
Re: mgetty+sendfax and zoom 56k (Clifford Kite)
apologies for multipost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2.2.X and NE2000 (root)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: J J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone using 3C507 (3Com EtherLink 16)?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 14:47:49 GMT
Derek,
If things work okay except for the error message, you could edit
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/3c507.c
at line 63, add this line:
#define NET_DEBUG 0
that should be right above the line that says:
/* use 0 for production, 1 for verification, 2..7 for debug */
that will turn off the "Rx unit stopped..." message (as well as others).
Hope that helps,
J J
Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I am using a 3C507 (3Com Etherlink16). And very often (esp during large
> transfer) I will see the following error message on my Linux box
>
> eth0: Rx unit stopped, status 5220, restarting.
>
------------------------------
From: Andreas Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Stupid question about remote shell cammands.
Date: 1 Mar 1999 15:53:30 GMT
You should read the man-page for the rsh-command.
There you will learn about the files .rhosts and
/etc/hosts.equiv. These files should contain
information about what hosts and users are allowed
to use remote commands like rsh.
- Andreas
Stephen Loewinsohn wrote:
>
> I have two RH5.2 machines (workstation install) connected via crossover
> cable. They can rlogin, but they can't rsh. The error message is
> "Permission denied". What do I need to change to allow them to rsh?
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
--
=================================================
In a world without fences and walls
who needs gates and windows?
========================== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Alexander Atkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Streaming audio over IP.
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:30:27 +0000
It depends how you want it to work.
If all you want is to stream a file then you can use Apache and steam MP3's
to WinAMP using HTTP.
There is an ADD URL option in WinAMP allowing you to play streaming MP3's
from such a server.
If you want realtime compression im not sure but I think I heard that Xing
have made such an encoder but even if they have XingMPEG is pretty awful
quality encoding.
Hope this has helped.
Alex.
Man Wei Tam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember many months ago there was a freely available realaudio encoder
> and streamer that worked for Linux. Now I can't find it again so I want
> to try and find another solution -- is there an alternative I can use?
>
> I'm looking for something that could stream mp3s from a Linux server.
> that would work with a Windows 98/NT client.
>
> Is there such a thing available?
>
> MWT
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Just Keijser)
Subject: Re: X Terminal setup - HP EnvizeX
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:16:58 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Does anybody know where to get the load software for these xterms? hp's
>website sucks, and I can't find much info on the web about hp xterms
>specifically anywhere.. too bad theres no manual. If you've set one of
>these up or are familiar with xterms please email with any info you
>have. thanks
>
ummm, you have to _BUY_ it from HP, I guess. And as far as I remember, it
didn't come cheap either! Where did you get the HP's from? Normally when
someone buys the terminal they buy the software to go along with it. Perhaps
the person you got the terminals from can give you a hand - is there an HP
9000 server available? That one most likely will have the client software on
it.
The HP terminal software wants to install in /usr/lib/X11/700X or something
like that, but it doesn't particularly care on what kind of host it's running
- I've booted HP terminals of Sun, RS/6000, HP, etc, (never Linux though, but
I don't see why it wouldn't work).
HTH,
JJ
==========================================================
*NOTE*
My Email return address is not correct
in order to avoid mass mailings...
These are the correct addresses
(but with dashes between all letters):
Jan Just (JJ) Keijser
Unix Support Engineer / Configuration Manager
Logica BV - The Netherlands
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to confuse some of those junkmailers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a world without fences, who needs Gates?
My views are my own...
flames > /dev/null 2>&1
==========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: 1 Mar 1999 07:51:42 -0600
James Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite) writes:
: [...]
: > Here is something strange. No ordinary modem can send or receive at
: > 115200 bit/sec over the usual PPP connection except with help from modem
: > compression and error correction. Connecting at that speed, specified by
: > the pppd option, very likely means that no error correction or compression
: > is configured in the modem itself.
: Uh, I don't think so. Modern modems can be told to report either DTE
: or DCE speed at connection time. Many PC users (for reasons that I
Absolutely, I've already been remained of this...
: He'd probably never have gotten this far if no error correction was
: being negotiated. V.34 and V.90 connections are pretty much unusable
and then realized this immediately. Very sloppy, no excuses.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Governments should be changed like diapers - often and for the
* same reason. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Connetcing to NT RAS with linux
Date: 1 Mar 1999 09:34:03 -0600
I'd guess that you need to remove the pppd "auth" option, the company
NT doesn't seem to want to authenticate itself to you. There are
some comments below that may help to understand what's going on.
Kiril Dunn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm running the Debian distribution of Linux in our office. I need to
: connect to the office of another company running NT Server via a dial-up
: line. The other company has set up RAS to accept "any authentication
: including clear-text" which according to MS help means PAP. I've set up the
: pap-secrets file to contain my user-name password pair. I've been attempting
: to connect using the following command line:
: pppd ttyS1 115200 connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/otherco"
: auth debug lock nodefaultroute noproxyarp modem crtscts require-pap user me
: The output of this is at the end of the message, which I hope someone can
: make more sense of than I could. The error message at the NT side is
: "authentication timout".
: Any help on this would be most appreciated.
: Kiril Dunn
: ZooTech Systems Pty. Ltd.
: Mar 1 14:47:52 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0xffff1404> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Pppd asks the peer to authenticate itself to pppd with PAP.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth chap 80> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth pap>]
The peer requests that pppd use CHAP to authenticate itself to the peer,
pppd says no but how about PAP.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0xffff1404> <pcomp> <accomp>]
The peer agrees to authenticate itself to pppd with PAP.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
The peer requests that pppd authenticate itself to the peer with PAP
and pppd agrees.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0
: magic=0xffff1404]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="me"
: password="mypassword"]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x1d12]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: Remote message:
Pppd succeeds in authenicating itself to the peer with PAP.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth chap 80> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
The peer restarts LCP negotiations, and again requests that pppd to use
CHAP to authenticate itself.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x3 <auth pap>]
As before pppd says no but how about PAP.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth pap>]
This time the peer rejects the request to authenticate itself to pppd
with PAP. Strange are the ways of NT.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <auth pap> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
: <magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0
: magic=0xffff80c9]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: peer refused to authenticate
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x4 "peer refused
: to authenticate"]
Pppd requests termination.
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x2127]
: Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x4]
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ??
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:41:30 GMT
You could try to recompile the kernel without any internet services,
comment everything out of inetd (or just turn it off).
Antonio Mechi wrote:
>
> I must to install Linux Red Hat 5.2 whitout Network services and without
> TCP/IP services.
> Can I to do this?
> and if Yes in which mode?
>
> Thanks for answers.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
JoHn 'DoH' KeLm
http://www.johndoh.cjb.net
"People are too stupid to realize they are" - DoH
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Yung)
Subject: Re: connecting 2 pc for file transfer
Date: 1 Mar 1999 16:27:41 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sasa Ostrouska ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I want to ask if somebody can tell me how to connect mz 2 pc for
: transfering files from one to another. I installed Linux on both my
: notebook and my desktop. I have some programs on mz desktop which I
: want to copy also on mz notebook. Is possible to connect them via
: paralel port or serial port to copy the files ? Pls. if someone can
: help me reply by e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should read the mini-HOWTO "PLIP" for parallel port connectivity.
If you want to connect them via serial port, you should read
PPP-HOWTO.
------------------------------
From: Aris CRuz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: static IP's
Date: 1 Mar 1999 16:31:29 GMT
Juergen Heinzl wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Antonio Boveia wrote:
> >I have a dial-up provider who doesn't provide static IP addresses,
> >and I want one. Is there any way around this? Can I register a
> >domain name and then update the IP address each time I dial in,
> >or is there some site out there that could act as 'pointer' to mine?
>
> Change your provider
>
> Cheers,
> Juergen
>
> --
> \ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
> \ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
> \ Phone Private : +44 181-332 0750 \ /
Some people from ML.org has decided to create a new service with the same
great ideas, DNS names for free. You can access them @ dhs.org. The only
problem is that they are just starting up, but they are in beta right now.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andr� Johansson)
Subject: drivers for de-528ct
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:58:09 GMT
Is the card properly supported in Linux?
If so, should one use the Linux 1.2.13 driver supplied by D-link or
use another driver? (i.e. in the kernel)
Perhaps as an NE-2000 compatible card, or use the de-500 drivers....
And, if anyone uses the card, is it any good?
t.i.a.
--
Andr� Johansson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dls faster in Windows!!
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 18:57:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> How are you measuring performance?
>
Mostly just subjectively... the difference is easy to notice. Netscape stalls
frequently and ftp downloads are even worse. I get good connections (45k or
so). I often start with a transfer rate of around 2.5k/s and then it rapidly
drops and then stalls.
Thanks,
Dave D.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: klogd, syslogd, and top question, help?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:32:36 -0600
Hello,
I posted before about one of our redhat servers not logging messages, and
connections even though klogd and syslogd were running and the syslog.conf
was configured ok. Someone wrote back and asked about , "top". Well top
locks the machine up and I have to reboot. I have only 16 megs of ram in it.
Could memory be an issue? Any ideas?
Scott
------------------------------
From: Bob Emes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Router on peer-to-peer lan?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 10:41:33 -0500
DD,
Suggest you get yourself a small ethernet hub that has 1 BNC and a few
RJ45 jacks and then just plug in the ISDN adapter. Should work as I've
been using this setup for a couple of years. Have fun!
Bob
David Burlage wrote:
> We have an existing peer-to-peer lan, daisy-chained with coax/bnc
> cables. I want to connect an ISDN router to the LAN, but it only
> has rj45 jacks. Can I use a rj45 to bnc adapter and add the
> router as if it was another workstation? Is there another/better
> way?
>
> My ethernet card has both a BNC and a RJ45 jack... I don't
> suppose I can use both at once?
>
> Thanks for any clues.
>
> DB
------------------------------
From: Derek Fountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netgear on 486?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:37:03 +0000
Does the Netgear FA310TX card work on a 486 machine? The manual (such as
it is) says it's for connecting a Pentium - no mention of 486 anywhere.
The problem is that, although the card seems to transmit information
(judging by the lights and tcpdump) it doesn't receive it (judging by
tcpdump and all other indicators).
Del
------------------------------
From: gus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: domain name reg and IP setup
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:37:01 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Zagni wrote:
>
> But surely this is a domain hosting service - correct me if I am wrong ?
>
> The info that I require is to know howto set up my own IP www homepage
> and control it from my own box, I know I need to contact the respecive
> authorities
> Who are they ?
> What hardware do I need - leased line or normal daily used telephone
> line ?
>
> I have set up PPP and DNS this works fine for my IPS but what if I would
>
> like to host my own server.
>
> Reasons my current home page is used to much and the IPS is withdrawing
> its
> use.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Matt
>
> okdj wrote:
>
> > http://www.internic.net
> >
> > everything you need to know is in the FAQs at this site
> >
> > Matt wrote:
> > >
[snip]
Uhm, Matt, internic *is* who you want to speak to ... and it sounds like
you will struggle to meet the requirements, which, IIRC require a backup
server, a permanent line, and some other things.
Well, they *will* have everything you need to know.
gus
------------------------------
From: Andreas Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using XDM inside VNC
Date: 1 Mar 1999 15:31:10 GMT
Find the xdm-configuration-file Xservers (On my system
it is in /usr/lib/X11/xdm) and replace the line
starting with ":0 local" with the following line:
:0 local /usr/local/vnc/Xvnc :0 -desktop X -httpd /usr/local/vnc/classes
\
-geometry 800x600 -depth 8 -rfbwait 120000 \
-rfbauth /root/.vnc/passwd -rfbport 5901
(all in one line, assuming vnc is installed in /usr/local/vnc,
you may not want to use all the parameters, or different values)
Then start xdm.
Looks weird, but works for me.
- Andreas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd like to have VNC services running on my home Linux box at boot-up. When
> accessing the VNC server, I'd like to be presented with an XDM login screen,
> to allow my to select which user to be. I'll typically be accessing my Linux
> box from my win98 PC.
>
> At this time, I've added VNC server to init.d at runlevel three.
> Unfortunately, it always runs as root. How do I use XDM to allow remote
> access by users?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
=================================================
In a world without fences and walls
who needs gates and windows?
========================== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Alexander Smondyrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: remote printing
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 11:14:57 -0500
F. B. Quinn wrote:
>
> I'm running a linux network in my Pedi-ENT clinic and can't get remote
> printing
> set up properly. (It works fine in my Adult-ENT clinic!) I've created
> the spool
> directory in the client and /etc/hosts.lpd in the printer server, and
> opened the
> permissions wide. I've lpc enabled and lpc started the remote printer,
> but
> I keep getting the message "waiting for <remote machine> to enable
> queuing"
> on the client. I'm baffled 'cuz I've set up remote printing elsewhere
> and can't
> figure what I'm doing wrong. Will appreciate suggestions.
> F.B.Quinn,Jr., M.D. Univ.Tx.Med.Branch Galveston, TX
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HI,
I am having similar problems with remote printing. I have
two almost identical Linux boxes and HP LaseJet 6MP printer.
If you happened to fix your problem, please, let me know
what was going on.
With best regards, Alex.
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where can I get ipautofw?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:11:17 -0500
http://www.linuxhq.com/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade-4.html#ss4.7 and follow the
link to ipautofw.
Jeff Volckaert
David Akins wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've been trying to find the ipautofw package for two days now. Can
>somebody tell me where to find this thing or maybe email it to me?
>The information for Linux sure is peacemeal... That's gonna need to
>change sooner or later.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Yung)
Subject: Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ??
Date: 1 Mar 1999 20:43:26 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antonio Mechi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I must to install Linux Red Hat 5.2 whitout Network services and without
: TCP/IP services. Can I to do this? and if Yes in which mode?
Perhaps, you might want to tell us more on what you are trying to
accomplish. So that we are not guessing your intention. What is your
definition of "Network" and "TCP/IP" services?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: mgetty+sendfax and zoom 56k
Date: 1 Mar 1999 15:04:56 -0600
Dan Tager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Tried it with minicom and I get an "OK" just fine, instantaneously.
: Something I noticed is that the first "OK" takes about 30 seconds to be
: "**found**".
That's not the way it looked in your first post. That kind of respose
time usually means that the IRQ configured in Linux is not the same
as the IRQ that the modem actually uses. I can't reconcile that with
an instant respose by minicom though.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Subject: apologies for multipost
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:14:26 GMT
My Deja News account kept returning an error with the post saying "Post
later", so you are seeing all my attempts to post. My apologies.
Thanks
JLH
In article <7becgm$k7v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an older p166 with RH 5.2
>
> Installed are two nics ( 1 Netgear PCI and 1 3com 3c509 isa. ) Due to the
> hardware configuration ( scsi, etc ) the netgear nic works like a champ but
> the 3com will not activate. I have the 3com set on IO:210 IRQ 3. I know
> this should conflict with the serial. But I have no modem and disabled at
> the BIOS the serial ports.
>
> This config works fine for Win95 Osr but not for linux. In RH I have setup the
> card under the kernal tool and it appears under the network management tool.
> However, I can not activate it, nor does it appear in the boot messages.
>
> Please any suggestions. Is there some default in the RH kernel for serial
> ports at IRQ 3/5 that is blocking the card? What else could I try, I have no
> other available ports.
>
> Worst case I will just put the proxy server under Win95 and scrubb
> linux....which hurts to say, but hey I have to have this thing working!!!
>
> Please provide feedback to either comp.os.linux.networking or jlangdonh@my-
> dejanews.com
>
> Thank you in advance.
> JLH
>
> Jeff Howard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
Jeff Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (root)
Subject: 2.2.X and NE2000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1 Mar 1999 09:37:38 -0000
Does anyone successfully have an NE2000 working with 2.2.X? I have tried
all 2.2.X kernels/patches. /proc/kmsg reports
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x3, ISR=0x2, t=1000.
when I try to ping.
Using tcpdump on a remote machines shows the machine with 2.2.X arps then
the destination machine responds. Using tcpdump on the 2.2.X machine
shows the arp, but no response. Which correlates well with what the
kernel is saying.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
