Linux-Networking Digest #346, Volume #10 Mon, 1 Mar 99 19:13:47 EST
Contents:
Re: Network Traffic Monitoring? (Andreas Peetz)
Problems configuring my modem (Jan Hermans)
Re: FTP downloads hang -- same problem (Basil Rathbone Fishburg the Infinite)
Re: Red Hat 5.2 SMTP Server (peter)
now what i have done wrong... (D E G)
Re: 3COM 3c905b and 100MBit ("Jay D Ribak")
Help with wu-2.4.2 anonymous ftp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Exim returns error to smtp client
Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ?? (Ali Bharmal)
Re: Attempting to setup PPTP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Fibre / Cat 5 cable (Luca Filipozzi)
linux pptp and tunnel setup ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Ethernet card address resolves to localhost!? ("Timothy Chu")
RADIUS server (Todd Glasgow)
Re: Help! How to redial/reconnect with pppd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
My intel won't either ("Jay Doscher")
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (bill davidsen)
Re: Netgear 310tx ("Rob")
APACHE and error message (Rick Gocher)
Re: [?] 2 nics working under 95 but not linux, RH 5.2 (Werner Kliewer)
[?] 2 nics working under 95 but not linux, RH 5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (bill davidsen)
Re: Web based e-mail (David Burlage)
tunneled connection ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? (bill davidsen)
Re: Network is unreachable ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andreas Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network Traffic Monitoring?
Date: 1 Mar 1999 15:59:53 GMT
Why not use free tools like ntop or karpski?
(Sorry, no URLs available, but you can search
for them on http://freshmeat.net)
- Andreas
Ed Finch wrote:
>
> "Robert A. Wicks" wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know of any tools for monitoring the total traffic on a
> > network? My Ethernet card is set in promiscuous mode by arpwatch, and
> > [...]
> Xni, http://www.xni.com
>
> Regards,
> Ed
--
=================================================
In a world without fences and walls
who needs gates and windows?
========================== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jan Hermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems configuring my modem
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:47:32 +0100
Hey,
I hope someone can help me with my modem problem:
I configured my modem (TARGA, 56.6) and a PPP-Network-Connection with
YaST (SuSE 6.0). When I try to connect to the Internet with ppp-up
generic nothing happens. In /var/log/messages you can find this:
... pppd[775]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root uid 0
... pppd[775]: tcgetattr: Input/ Output error (5)
... ... Exit.
Also when I try to use the modem with minicom there is no response: No
dialtone, no LEDs blinking!!
Perhaps it is just a little thing, but I am using Linux just for a short
time, so I do not know, what to do.
Thanx,
Jan
------------------------------
From: Basil Rathbone Fishburg the Infinite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FTP downloads hang -- same problem
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:01:40 -0500
I have a similar problem. A large FTP fails after only a few seconds (ncftp
gives a "failed read" error). Doesn't matter what FTP client I'm using:
Netscape 4.5, ncftp, standard ftp. This is a RedHat 5.0/piecewise 5.2...
FTP works normally from Win-NT -- does anyone have any idea why it wouldn't
work from linux? As far as I know this has been a problem since the
original installation. Any FTP download bigger than a meg or so will freeze
most of the time; sometimes it will eventually go through, but I haven't
noticed any pattern yet.
thanks for any help
--sil
--
*&* There's only ONE god! *&* Silauren Half-Elven
*&* He is the SUN god!! *&* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*&* Ra! Ra!! RA!!! *&* "Get in there, you big
furry oaf! I don't care what you smell!" -Han Solo
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter)
Subject: Re: Red Hat 5.2 SMTP Server
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:21:06 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I installed the IMAP package and can now access the POP3 server to
> receive mail comming from the Linux box, but I can not send mail from
> WIN98/Outlook Express to the Linux box.
>
> I think I am missing the SMTP Server. Does any one know how to set up
> the SMTP Server on the Linux box ?
>
you are talking about two different things !!
1) imap/pop2/pop3 allows you to receive mail from your linuxmachine
you�ve installed it and it seems to work !
2) sendmail
this one receives mail and sends mail on the linuxmachine
(and include the smtp-part)
I�m sure you�ve installed it when you installed redhat52
possible problems :
sendmail is misconfigured (look to http://www.harker.com/webgencf/)
your network is misconfigured so one of the two machines cannot locate
the other.
peter
=================
pilsl@
ANTISPAM
goldfisch.atat.at
------------------------------
From: D E G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: now what i have done wrong...
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:25:46 -0500
i just downloaded the samba 2.0.2-1 rpm from redhat. i upgraded to it
from samba 1.9.8.
now every time i try to run smbd or any other smb executable i get the
following error:
smbd: error in loading shared libraries
: undefined symbol : __register_frame_info
according to rpm all the dependencies are met, and a brief manual check
seems to confirm this.
what could be missing? how can i fix this?
thanks in advance. all help is greatly appreciated.
D E G
--
Remove "_nospam_" to reply.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but desperate times call for desperate
measures.
------------------------------
From: "Jay D Ribak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3COM 3c905b and 100MBit
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:53:23 -0500
I have found that the 3c905 cards do not do autosense very well in Linux.
The simple solution to this is to boot off of a dos disk, run the 3com
config utility provided with the card, and manually set the line speed to
100mb/s, and possibly the duplex setting as well if you require full duplex.
This *should* solve your problem...it has worked for me in several cases
where the card could not autosense it was hooked up to a full duplex link.
Good Luck
Jay R.
Jan Kuemmerle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7be3aj$1hkd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Hi all,
>I have some problems with my networkcard.
>The card does not recognise that it is connectet to an 100MBit LAN.
>Thanks
> Jan
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help with wu-2.4.2 anonymous ftp
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:15:12 GMT
I'm using wu-2.4.2 anonymous ftp server and I'm having a weird problem. I
need the contents of my /pub directory to be hidden (so they need to know the
subdir) so I set it to 751. Works great, but here is the weird part. Every
now and then pub's group gets changed to "ftp" and the contents of the pub
directory become visible. I change it back to "root" and all is well again.
I'd love to know how/why it's getting changed! Any leads appreciated!
-jim
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exim returns error to smtp client
Date: 1 Mar 1999 22:31:30 GMT
I get this while trying to use my debian box as an smtp server with exim
as the mta.
The SMTP server returner an error. Account: 'debian', Server:
'192.168.100.18', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: 'exim: neither action
flags nor mail addresses given', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Error Number:
0x800CCC60
Any clues what I'm missing?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Ali Bharmal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I make Linux NETWORKless and TCP/IPLess - ??
Date: 1 Mar 1999 20:10:29 GMT
JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could try to recompile the kernel without any internet services,
> comment everything out of inetd (or just turn it off).
But doesn't some stuff never work without TCP/IP? I mean non-network stuff.
> Antonio Mechi wrote:
>>
>> I must to install Linux Red Hat 5.2 whitout Network services and without
>> TCP/IP services.
>> Can I to do this?
>> and if Yes in which mode?
Run the TCP/IP stack in loopback mode only (so the only address or hardware
is internal to 127.0.0.1) and it's effectively a standalone machine. Get rid
of all the network services from however RedHat does it's init (I use SuSE
and would run the machine at a different runlevel).
--
_ |. |_ |_ _ _ _ _ _ | Selwyn College, Grange Road, Cambridge CB3 9DQ, UK
(_||| |_)| |(_|| `| | |(_|| (01223) 721147 http://quango.sel.cam.ac.uk/
"I am determined to prove a villain and hate the idle pleasures of these days"
Richard III Ferrofluid hompage http://www-stu.sel.cam.ac.uk/members/nab26/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Attempting to setup PPTP
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 18:03:27 GMT
Hi, I am trying to install pptp tunneling and http , https , and ftp, mail,
news tunneling on a linux box so that my internal network can publish their
services. I have setup a linux with 5.2 redhat using 2.0.36 kernel, and I
enabled masqurade and firewall support, and ipautofw support. I read the
how-to such as http://www-
plateau.cs.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/linux_pptp.html and tried to install
the pptp patch and ipautofw patch for the 2.0.36 kernel, it compiled and
doesn't work. I looked at it the patching process again and got a fresh
2.0.36 kernel and applied pptp patch, and then applied ipportfw patch, looked
carefully and found the ipportfw doesn't appear in the "make menuconfig" so I
got a new 2.0.36 again and this time I applied the ipportfw patch and then
pptp patch, run "make menuconfig" again, this time the pptp entry doesn't
appear in the network options entry. I read more and realized that ipautofw
maybe equivalent to ipportfw , so I got a fresh 2.0.36 kernel again and
applied pptp patch only , enabled masqurade and pptp and ipautofw, installed
kerkel, reboot machine, follow the HOW-to instruction, enabled the masqurade,
dialed internet, the masqurade worked fine, I can ping internet from my
internal machine, but then I issued the ipautofw command, I checked
/proc/net/ip_autofw and did see 2 new entry are inserted , I want my dial up
machine's port 80 to be forward into my internal machine.( I have disabled my
linux box's own httpd, so there is no port 80 conflict). now I tried to
connect from internet to my linux box and hope to get to my internel machine,
oops, it doesn't work! I tried kernel 2.2.1, went through the same process,
doesn't work either. I read the how-to and it claimed the 2.0.37 kernel
should incorporate the patches, I searched the internet and didn't find the
2.0.37 kernel. Frustrated, I labored for 2 days and got nothing done. wonder
if somebody has better luck than I do. I searched the news group and
somebody claimed using squid may be able to get the tunnel work, I tried to
read the squid manual and realized it is for caching , not for the purpose I
want. wonder if somebody can lend me a hand and save my poor head. Any one
who can tell me the detailed process of working box will be welcome. as far
as I can see I need the following: linux kernel, patch command script,
and it seems to have to be the correct version, anyone who has a working box,
can you tell me
how ?
Thanks!
Jinsong
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Fibre / Cat 5 cable
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:40:59 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bj@tilian-
products.demon.co.uk says...
> This isn't really linux related, but seen as I use Linux, and will use
> linux on the machines concerned I thought I'd post it anyway!
>
> I currently have two separate networks, in two separate buildings. I
> want to connect the two, the buildings are about twenty metres apart,
> and one takes it's mains electricity from the other. I want to know if
> it is safe to just connect a cat 5 cable between the hubs in the two
> buildings, or if I have to fibre it. I really don't want to put the
> network at risk, as I've got some pretty expensive hardware, (IBM
> RS/6000. Thanks in advance....
>
Fibre fibre...
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development,linux.act.ppp,linux.dev.ppp
Subject: linux pptp and tunnel setup ?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 18:05:41 GMT
Hi, I am trying to install pptp tunneling and http , https , and ftp, mail,
news tunneling on a linux box so that my internal network can publish their
services. I have setup a linux with 5.2 redhat using 2.0.36 kernel, and I
enabled masqurade and firewall support, and ipautofw support. I read the
how-to such as http://www-
plateau.cs.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/linux_pptp.html and tried to install
the pptp patch and ipautofw patch for the 2.0.36 kernel, it compiled and
doesn't work. I looked at it the patching process again and got a fresh
2.0.36 kernel and applied pptp patch, and then applied ipportfw patch, looked
carefully and found the ipportfw doesn't appear in the "make menuconfig" so I
got a new 2.0.36 again and this time I applied the ipportfw patch and then
pptp patch, run "make menuconfig" again, this time the pptp entry doesn't
appear in the network options entry. I read more and realized that ipautofw
maybe equivalent to ipportfw , so I got a fresh 2.0.36 kernel again and
applied pptp patch only , enabled masqurade and pptp and ipautofw, installed
kerkel, reboot machine, follow the HOW-to instruction, enabled the masqurade,
dialed internet, the masqurade worked fine, I can ping internet from my
internal machine, but then I issued the ipautofw command, I checked
/proc/net/ip_autofw and did see 2 new entry are inserted , I want my dial up
machine's port 80 to be forward into my internal machine.( I have disabled my
linux box's own httpd, so there is no port 80 conflict). now I tried to
connect from internet to my linux box and hope to get to my internel machine,
oops, it doesn't work! I tried kernel 2.2.1, went through the same process,
doesn't work either. I read the how-to and it claimed the 2.0.37 kernel
should incorporate the patches, I searched the internet and didn't find the
2.0.37 kernel. Frustrated, I labored for 2 days and got nothing done. wonder
if somebody has better luck than I do. I searched the news group and
somebody claimed using squid may be able to get the tunnel work, I tried to
read the squid manual and realized it is for caching , not for the purpose I
want. wonder if somebody can lend me a hand and save my poor head. Any one
who can tell me the detailed process of working box will be welcome. as far
as I can see I need the following: linux kernel, patch command script,
and it seems to have to be the correct version, anyone who has a working box,
can you tell me
how ?
Thanks!
Jinsong
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Timothy Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet card address resolves to localhost!?
Date: 1 Mar 1999 22:42:12 GMT
Richard Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: You'll probably want to create an /etc/hosts file containing the local
: IP addresses and names of your other local boxes.
: That is, if I'm understanding your question correctly...
Well, sortof. I don't mind using the ip addresses for now, and it's only
a lone win95 box that's on the network with the linux box. However, I was
wondring if I needed to put the win95 ip address somewhere in my linux
config files so that linux knows what IP addresses are there.
I tried it out today, and it seems to work. However, I'm having a couople
of problems on the win95 side:
1) dial-up networking pops up all the time, but cancelling it continues to
use linux as the "host".
2) it's slow (response time is 1-2 seconds)
I'll search around the newsgroup a bit more...I'm sure it's here
somewhere. But don't let that stop you from responding! :)
--
,,*,,,,,______/|___,i__/~~, ,. ,.' To reply remove the 's' in my
o \` / ` email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o / ))) --_\ Vancouver, British Columbia
<tim>< ~~~\|----~~\ \ http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/spider/v8k1
------------------------------
From: Todd Glasgow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RADIUS server
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:02:34 -0600
Does anyone have some experience with using Linux as a RADIUS server...
I have an Ascend 6000 with two incoming PRI's and an Outgoing T1. I
need to install and configure a RADIUS server to authenticate my inbound
clients...I know unix and NT have third party programs; however I have
found little info in the Linux world. Any suggestions? :-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help! How to redial/reconnect with pppd
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:08:58 GMT
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 00:28:44 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>My ISP disconnects me around every 6 hours and I was wondering if there is a
>simple script to make pppd redial once the connection drops out.
>
>Thanks
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
use the persist option
tng
------------------------------
From: "Jay Doscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My intel won't either
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 14:25:01 GMT
I have the samee problem too with an intel 10/100 card... I posted a
queestion here an no-one anwered.... good luck.
Jan Kuemmerle wrote in message <7be3aj$1hkd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi all,
>I have some problems with my networkcard.
>The card does not recognise that it is connectet to an 100MBit LAN.
>Thanks
> Jan
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To:
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,comp.unix.solaris,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,vmsnet.networks.misc
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 1 Mar 1999 22:58:30 GMT
In article <uzfgnuyfanshqr.f7dwp30.pminews@boss>,
Hans-Michael Stahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:52:03 GMT, Stuart Summerville wrote:
|
| > Just curious to know what themes you use for machine names on your
| > local networks.
|
| One of our WINS servers is named Lewinsky ...
Used to work in a place where groups of machines had a theme, like fish
names, lakes, etc. One group got named after body fluids, the servers
were snot, vomit and mucus...
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
changed regularly and for the same reason.
--Ted Symons(?)
------------------------------
From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netgear 310tx
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:31:13 -0700
Well, I was able to mount the floppy, for that I am very thankful. Only
problem I have now when I try to compile the tulip.c file as netgear's files
said, I get a fatal error. I believe it was something like "11 fatal
error".
I forget the rest of the error as I was working on it last night. But
thanks for the advice on how to get access to my floppy drive.
Rob
Joewono Setiabudi wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>First you need to mount your floppy so you can access the diskette.
>
>How to mount (must be root):
>1. create a directory, you can name it anything.
>2. type: mount /dev/fd0 thenewdirectory
>3. go to the directory that you just created, you should be able to
> see the content of the disk in that directory now.
>If you can't see the content, than you might need to use other device.
>My floppy is at /dev/fd0, your might be different than mine.
>
>I don't know how to load the ethernet module though.
>What I did just compile the kernel with a support for that ethernet card
>and it will work.
>
------------------------------
Subject: APACHE and error message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Gocher)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 23:19:29 GMT
I have just upgraded to 1.3.4 and can't get to any hosted websites anymore,
keeps saying "Can't access startfile http://www.whatever.com" I believe the
httpd.conf is set correctly, I have left the srm.conf blank per apache notes,,,
not sure what I'm missing.
Any ideas?
tia
Rick G
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: [?] 2 nics working under 95 but not linux, RH 5.2
From: Werner Kliewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 18:27:24 GMT
J,
Use setserial to reconfigure your serial ports.
You may also have to initialize the card, if it is a PNP card. There is PNP
support for linux, and it mostly works. I have one machine with PNP modem and
network card that works fine. I have not yet tried 2 network cards in linux, but
I know people who have it working.
On my main machine at home I have 3 serial ports in operation. I had to use
setserial to get the configuration to work. Linux, like most Intel-based OS's,
defaults to a configuration that has 2 serial ports preconfigured. One of those
is most likely interfering with your setup.
In article <7becgm$k7v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote:
> I have an older p166 with RH 5.2
>
> Installed are two nics ( 1 Netgear PCI and 1 3com 3c509 isa. ) Due to the
> hardware configuration ( scsi, etc ) the netgear nic works like a champ but
> the 3com will not activate. I have the 3com set on IO:210 IRQ 3. I know
> this should conflict with the serial. But I have no modem and disabled at
> the BIOS the serial ports.
>
> This config works fine for Win95 Osr but not for linux. In RH I have setup the
> card under the kernal tool and it appears under the network management tool.
> However, I can not activate it, nor does it appear in the boot messages.
>
> Please any suggestions. Is there some default in the RH kernel for serial
> ports at IRQ 3/5 that is blocking the card? What else could I try, I have no
> other available ports.
>
> Worst case I will just put the proxy server under Win95 and scrubb
> linux....which hurts to say, but hey I have to have this thing working!!!
>
> Please provide feedback to either comp.os.linux.networking or jlangdonh@my-
> dejanews.com
>
> Thank you in advance.
> JLH
>
> Jeff Howard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
Werner Kliewer
Manitoba Public Insurance
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Subject: [?] 2 nics working under 95 but not linux, RH 5.2
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:45:05 GMT
I have an older p166 with RH 5.2
Installed are two nics ( 1 Netgear PCI and 1 3com 3c509 isa. ) Due to the
hardware configuration ( scsi, etc ) the netgear nic works like a champ but
the 3com will not activate. I have the 3com set on IO:210 IRQ 3. I know
this should conflict with the serial. But I have no modem and disabled at
the BIOS the serial ports.
This config works fine for Win95 Osr but not for linux. In RH I have setup the
card under the kernal tool and it appears under the network management tool.
However, I can not activate it, nor does it appear in the boot messages.
Please any suggestions. Is there some default in the RH kernel for serial
ports at IRQ 3/5 that is blocking the card? What else could I try, I have no
other available ports.
Worst case I will just put the proxy server under Win95 and scrubb
linux....which hurts to say, but hey I have to have this thing working!!!
Please provide feedback to either comp.os.linux.networking or jlangdonh@my-
dejanews.com
Thank you in advance.
JLH
Jeff Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 1 Mar 1999 23:02:38 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Shakespeare, so nodes were named after characters from his plays -
| Oberon, Banquo, Pistol, Scroop and so on. The third place ended up with
| Arthur, Merlin, Galahad, Lancelot and Mordred, a border router called
| Moat and two ISDN routers called Sword & Stone. My current post has
| followed a similar scheme with servers, but with other Welsh characters
| - Glyndwr and Madog.
I had a router named roto. Europeans will not understand why.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
changed regularly and for the same reason.
--Ted Symons(?)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Burlage)
Subject: Re: Web based e-mail
Date: 1 Mar 1999 19:01:48 GMT
There is a great little cgi script for web-based email. Easy to
set up and free. Search cgiresources or somehting for "anyemail"
DB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hi folks, Can anyone help me/point me towards information about setting up
: web based e-mail? Is this more of an HTML/Java question, or are there some
: Linux/Unix programs available for this? What I would like to do is to
: forward my e-mail via sendmail to my NTserver, and use exchange, and also
: forward a copy to a web based email server (preferrably on the Linux machine
: running sendmail).
:
: -thanks for any help
: -andrew
:
: -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
: http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tunneled connection
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:42:36 GMT
Is there any way to allow ping between the external computer and the
workstations on the LAN-- if it's running Windows??
I have done it with the external computer running linux (tunneling, as
in NET3-HOWTO). But I can't see how it will be possible to let Windows
machines do it.
Has anybody out there achieved this?
=================================================
Linux box has an ethernet address
and an ISP assigned internet address
External computer has an ISP assigned internet address
Local Network
192.168.2.x _ 207.100.2.3 _
_ _ {_ }----------------------|_ |
|_|---|_| ISP External/roaming
W Workstations computer
\
\206.100.1.2 _
192.168.2.1|_|-----------{_}
/Linux ISP
/
_ _ /
|_|----|_|
W W
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.x,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: 1 Mar 1999 23:31:45 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I got the utils from metalab. they work from linux to linux. takes
| time to learn how to set it up especially if you want to persist
| conection. EQL uses a unique way of doing the load balanceing.
| everyother ip packet was sent over the other line...one here, one
| there and so one.
Interesting, because the EQL I used to use to one ISP didn't work that
way at all, the incoming data all came over one modem until there was a
backlog, then the other modem(s) were used.
That may have been a feature of his Livingston Portmaster, but I don't
think balancing is a feature of EQL per se, any packet will be accepted
on any line.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
changed regularly and for the same reason.
--Ted Symons(?)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network is unreachable
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 18:58:59 GMT
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 12:55:29 -0800, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Ive got the same prob. The machine sees the card. Pings its loopback and
>own ip but never sends out any packets. Is it a routing prob?
>I have used ne2000 clones and get
>eth0: Trigger_send() called while transmitter busy. (HUH?)
>with a wd8003 it doesnt complain just never lights the tx light.
>Please keep me posted if anybody figures this out.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Came across a posting on the Intel user forums that documents the
exact same problem I'm having. The poster on the forum says that the
BNC connection works but can't get the RJ45 connection to work.
Interesting....I've got to give this a try. If it works, that would
explain the illusion of operation but doesn't solve the overall
problem.
I'll keep the info coming as I learn more.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
