Linux-Networking Digest #350, Volume #10 Tue, 2 Mar 99 06:13:46 EST
Contents:
IP Masquerading: losing connections? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Telnet and rlogin as root (William Heymann)
logging in to remote machine (Mike Redan)
modem: how to measure bandwidth (Luc Taesch)
Network problem (Derek Fountain)
Re: New Redhat installation - cannot telnet to localhost. ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Re: Fibre / Cat 5 cable ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Samba 2.02 work as PDC? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Gerhart)
File Server Access Control and Windows NT (Barry Schneider)
Re: mgetty+sendfax and zoom 56k ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Re: shareing files between 2 PC's ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Re: developing new driver (Marcus Reid)
no password ask by samba 2.2 (Jayasuthan)
Re: connected or not connected to linux box ("Zheng Sun")
Re: dns and sendmail experts! Please help! ("Joakim Langlet (admin)")
PPP - bad fcs - help me ("Mariusz �yci�ski")
Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix Quote of the month (Peter Scully)
Re: Plesae suggest V.35 sync card for Linux? ("William R. Mattil")
Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem (Paul Miyasaki)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Masquerading: losing connections?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 02:10:20 GMT
I've set up Linux boxes with IP Masquerading to act as cable modem routers
for small LANs before, and they've always worked fine. Recently, I set one
up for my neighbor, who happens to be on the same cable-modem segment as I
am, and his works for awhile (12-24 hours), then eventually stops working.
When it "stops working", I can ping out to say, home.netscape.com, from a
machine behind the router, and the DNS resolution works ok, and the ping
comes back ok. However, when I try to access web sites, the http request
seems to go out ok but the browser never gets the data from the web site. In
hopes of reproducing the problem, I brought the box back over to my house and
put it in place as my router. It's been working fine for a couple of days
now, but I usually only use http, telnet, and ftp, whereas he uses AOL
Instant messaging, and probably other chat-like services as well. Could some
service be sending the IP Masq stuff into the weeds? I've installed the
application support modules that come with the kernel, and I noticed AOLIM is
supposed to work ok without adding anything special, so I'm suspecting more
esoteric problems. It's just frustratingly strange that it works fine for me
for days, but quits on him after a few hours. Any ideas on why this is
happening or how I go about debugging this? TIA...
anger
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: William Heymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Telnet and rlogin as root
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 07:12:46 +0000
Gert Wollny wrote:
>
> Ronald Hovens wrote:
> >
> > I am not able to telnet or rlogin to my linux box: when I try to login
> > as root I get erromessage Login incorrect.
> > However, if I try a 'normal' user, it works!
> >
> > Is this normal/what can I do about it?
> There is a file /etc/securegettys, here you would have to add the
> terminals for in-telneting (AFAIK ttyp0,ttyp1,...), but you should not
> do that for security reasons if your linux box is connected to the world
> outside.
> Log in as normal user and 'su' instead.
>
> Bye
>
> Gert
>
> --
> Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive NeuroSience http://www.cns.mpg.de
>
> http://gerti.home.pages.de
Try using ssh you can log in as root remotely using that and everything
is
encrypted so that passwords to not get passed around as plain text.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Redan)
Subject: logging in to remote machine
Date: 2 Mar 1999 06:42:16 GMT
how can I make my laptop login to my main box (over a network) by default,
so that I only have to maintain one central place for all my users. The
way I have the two 'puters configured right now is they are connected via
PLIP.
also, how can I launch X apps off of the the main computer, and have it
display on the laptop, like netscape or something similar. I have very
limited room on the laptop and would like to make it (please excuse the
buzz word) a "thin client".
thanks in advance,
Mike
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luc Taesch)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.dial-up
Subject: modem: how to measure bandwidth
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 10:21:26 GMT
are there any way to measure bandwidth when im connected,
either the (effective )speed of the modem, and the effective transfert
rate ?
thks
Luc
------------------------------
From: Derek Fountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network problem
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:50:02 +0000
If anyone can give me a clue on this, I'd appreciate it...
I've just bought a Netgear 100mbps network kit: FE104 hub, two FA310TX
PCI cards and cabling. The two machines are a 133mhz 486, 32MB with
2.0.34, and a P166 64MB with 2.0.36; both systems are Redhat 5.1 based.
I've recompiled the kernels on both to include the appropriate driver
(Dec 21140 adaptor) and, after running the Redhat network setup, things
seem OK. 'ifconfig' recognises the cards as working and I've set up the
routing tables.
Here's the problem: they don't talk! Just trying a 'ping' on either
machine results in nothing. I saw that the ARP tables were empty, and
doing a tcpdump on either machine just shows the ARP 'who-has' going
across, but getting no response. I set up the ARP tables manually, then
retried the ping. This time tcpdump shows the outgoing imcp packet
(because it's got past the ARP hold up), but nothing coming back - and,
at the other end, nothing coming in either. It's as if the packet is
getting across, but is not being passed up the receiving kernel's TCPIP
stack.
Lights flick on the receiving network card, so I don't think it's the
hub or cabling (but the lights flick every few seconds, not every second
as I would expect if that means anything).
I've checked both kernels carefully and I can't see anything obvious
that I've missed in the config, but suggestions are welcome.
'dmesg | grep eth0' gives:
eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC at 0x6400, 00 a0 cc 3b 78 f0, IRQ 9.
eth0: MII transceiver found at MDIO address 1, config 1000 status 782d.
eth0: Advertising 01e1 on PHY 1, previously advertising 01e1.
eth0: Changing PNIC configuration to half-duplex, CSR6 812e0000.
eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled.
eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled.
Those last lines are from when tcpdump is started.
If anyone's got any ideas, I'd be grateful.
Del
------------------------------
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New Redhat installation - cannot telnet to localhost.
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:40:47 -0800
The Apache server is great for web, but you need to run
telnetd and ftpd to get the other services.
They don't start by default because of security issues.
(A new user probably doesn't want people telnetting into their box.)
>> I set up the ethernet card fine (tulip interface) and have set up the IP
>> numbers for the machines (192.168.1.x). The linux box is running the
default
>> apache server (with the 'It worked!' index.html page) and the macs can
>> successfully use the linux box as their web server.
------------------------------
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fibre / Cat 5 cable
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:06:40 -0800
I vote for low tech.
10 Base T network specifies that that maximum segment
length can be 100 Meters. This is actually the
max distance between any two hosts on the same network.
If you are within this range you are fine.
If you plan on putting routers on the two networks with
a route between (to keep them separate) then you could
even consider a redundant cable for backup.
(as diagrammed below.) That way the separate cables
can be located some distance apart, preventing such
nasties as rodents or party banners from bringing the
net down with the cable. This is still cheaper and more
reliable than a fiber bridge.
h-------\ ______________ /-----h
h--------\ \ / \ / /-------h
h---------- R1 R2----------h
h---------/ / \_______________/ \ \--------h
h---------/ \------h
Benjamin Johnson wrote in message ...
>This isn't really linux related, but seen as I use Linux, and will use
>linux on the machines concerned I thought I'd post it anyway!
>
>I currently have two separate networks, in two separate buildings. I
>want to connect the two, the buildings are about twenty metres apart,
>and one takes it's mains electricity from the other. I want to know if
>it is safe to just connect a cat 5 cable between the hubs in the two
>buildings, or if I have to fibre it. I really don't want to put the
>network at risk, as I've got some pretty expensive hardware, (IBM
>RS/6000. Thanks in advance....
>--
>Benjamin Johnson
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Gerhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba 2.02 work as PDC?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:21:52 +0100
==============F0AEA8FAB9E643228BDDB380
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear reader,
in my company, I would like to set up a free PDC for WindowsNT 4
Workstations. I think Samba 2 should have implemented the Domain Control
Protocol, so it should work as a PDC.
All the instructions I read so far were mans and READMEs for Samba
1.9.x, so I don't know how to tell Samba 2.x: you act as PDC and serve
the passwords for the Workstations.
Thanx for any suggestions.
Bjoern
--
Bj�rn Gerhart e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lynarstr. 5
13353 Berlin
==============F0AEA8FAB9E643228BDDB380
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Dear reader,
<p>in my company, I would like to set up a free PDC for WindowsNT 4 Workstations.
I think Samba 2 should have implemented the Domain Control Protocol, so
it should work as a PDC.
<p>All the instructions I read so far were mans and READMEs for Samba 1.9.x,
so I don't know how to tell Samba 2.x: you act as PDC and serve the passwords
for the Workstations.
<p>Thanx for any suggestions.
<br>
Bjoern
<br>
<br>
<pre>--
Björn Gerhart e-Mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lynarstr. 5
13353 Berlin</pre>
</html>
==============F0AEA8FAB9E643228BDDB380==
------------------------------
From: Barry Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: File Server Access Control and Windows NT
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 00:14:50 -0800
What level of access control does linux provide while acting as a file
server to windows nt clients?
Please also email to me your reply.
Thanks in advance
--
Barry Schneider
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LongView International
1875 S Grant Street, Suite 770
San Mateo, CA 94402
www.lvi.com.
(650) 524-1900
(650) 524-1901 FAX
------------------------------
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mgetty+sendfax and zoom 56k
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:21:39 -0800
This could be a timeout issue or an IRQ issue.
Can you verify that the modem is set for Com3 IRQ4?
It is essential that a serial mouse NOT be on Com1 (cua0)
(This is going to be my guess at the problem.)
because the IRQ would always take time to process
mouse data even when you don't care.
Next, check the TIMEOUT value in the chat script.
Bump it up a second or two.
Dan Tager wrote in message <7bep6k$k41$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Timothy Murphy wrote in message <7b6lep$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>"Dan Tager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>I seem to be having problems getting an external Zoom 56Kx dualmode modem
>to
>>>work with mgetty+sendfax. The init strings that are being sent seem to
be
>>>correct.
>>>running mgetty 1.0.0 and kernel 2.0.35.
>>
>>>02/26 08:49:24 yS2 lowering DTR to reset Modem
>>>02/26 08:49:25 yS2 send: \dATQ0V1H0[0d]
>>>02/26 08:49:25 yS2 waiting for ``OK'' ** found **
>>>02/26 08:49:44 yS2 send: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d]
>>>02/26 08:49:44 yS2 waiting for ``OK''
>>>02/26 08:50:04 yS2 timeout in chat script, waiting for `OK'
>>
>>I'm not an expert on modems, and I don't have a Zoom modem,
>>but it seems to me that your modem is not responding "OK" when expected.
>>If I were in that position, I would try sending these codes to the modem,
>>eg using "cu", and see how it responds.
>>
>
>
>Tried it with minicom and I get an "OK" just fine, instantaneously.
>Something I noticed is that the first "OK" takes about 30 seconds to be
>"**found**".
>I looked up the codes in the book and compared them with the USR modems
that
>work, and they are the same.
>Anything else?
>
>--Dan
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shareing files between 2 PC's
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:26:20 -0800
Have your desktop running mounted (the mount daemon.)
Then simply mount your desktop on your notebook using rmount.
Sounds simpler than it is, but it's still pretty simple.
Sasa Ostrouska wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hy to all !
>
> Can anybody help me with this question. Is possible to copy
>files from my desktop Linux box to my notebook Linux box ? How is this
>done in the easiest way for example with the com port or serial port or
>thru modem ?
>
>Thank You
>Sasa
>
------------------------------
From: Marcus Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: developing new driver
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 01:12:37 -0800
Linux Device Drivers
ISBN 1-56592-292-1
dom wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'd be surprised if that post was in the right place but....
> I'd like to develop a driver for the Madge token ring cards.
> Where do I start ?
>
> Dom
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 12:36:14 -0800
From: Jayasuthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: no password ask by samba 2.2
Hi,
can anyone tell me why samba 2.2. ask password went mount NT disk.. even
there is no -P option ... huh !
--
#include <linux/geek.h>
<----|
I run around LAN for 10 Hours....
Surf WAN for 4 hours and........
play on localhost for 3 hours !
Is this mean I am qualify to become a GEEK !
|---->
"The sky looks blue but it is not"
---> Don't see things and believe <-----
------------------------------
From: "Zheng Sun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: connected or not connected to linux box
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:18:54 -0500
Hi,
I had almost the same problem as you when I tried to link a new 98 box to my
linux box yesterday. In my case, the 98 box 'c:\telnet mylinuxbox' didn't
work. After telnet window popped up, it died right before 'login:' prompt.
The Oracle 'sqlplus' in Window environment didn't establish the connection
with Oracle server
on Linux box either. My 'c:\sqlplus orcl' in Dos worked and 'c:\tnsping
orcl' was normal. I could do 'c:\ftp mylinuxbox' as well. I wondered when
you were installing the 98 was your PC connected to the Linux box. I guess
the winsock doesn't work because the 98 installed without the network
connection. My next hit will reinstall the 98 with the LAN connection. My
old installation steps like this: 98 >> NIC >> 98 'network' setup. If this
fails, I will try to download Winsock 2.0 from
ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/WinSock
to see if it can solve the problem.
Good Luck
------------------------------
From: "Joakim Langlet (admin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dns and sendmail experts! Please help!
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 00:28:28 +0100
I probably need something that I think was called something like "sendmail
virtual hosting".
To be able to do this, I will have to build some files
:/etc/virtualusertable.db/.pag
To do this I will have to use the tool: makemap
The makemap that I have on my system complains about not supporting
the table type: dbm
Where would I find a newer/better version of makemap. My current
distribution is Debian
2.0 (/hamm)?
regards
Joakim Langlet
Joakim Langlet (admin) skrev i meddelandet <7bca05$12i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I use fetchmail-4.6.0 to fetch mail from my ISP to allow local distrubution
>from a...........
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Mariusz �yci�ski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP - bad fcs - help me
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:11:09 +0100
Hi
I'm new in LINUX - 4 weeks ago I started my adventure with LINUX RH 5.2
I have link (not Dialup) whith my ISP and modem Goramo and it don't work.
All the instructions I read and nothing.
In file /var/log/messages:
...
kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 10000
: set xasncmap
: set xnit asyncmap ffffffff
: set flags to 10000
: set mru to 5dc
: set mrv to asyncmap ffffffff
: set flags to 10000
pppd: Connect ppp0 <---> /dev/cua1
kernel: ppp: Successfully qued 10 bytes, flags=f010000
: frame with bad fcs, excess ebc7
... one or more line with bad fcs ...
: modem hangup
: Connection terminated
: Exit
My file /etc/options:
# /etc/ppp/options
-detach
My IP:IP ISP
modem
lock
crtscts
defaultroute
asyncmap 0
mtu 552
mru 552
Mariusz �.
------------------------------
From: Peter Scully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc,comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix Quote of the month
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 18:33:18 +0800
equality7-2125 wrote:
> You couldn't find your arse with both hands and a map.
>
> >> I dunno about you, but when someone writes a program for my company, I
> >> like to think they know the fscking language their "writing" it in. Same
> >
> >Shouldn't it be the're? Talking about the language they are writing in.
>
> You have the arrogance to suggest that whoever posted a valid question
> should read a dictionary. If *I* were to do such a thing, then I would make
> sure that I too had read one, and also understood the way that *grammar*
> works in English language before posting my reply. You presumably are
> looking for:
>
> They're or they are
>
Actually, no. But his knowledge of english doesn't validate his arguments, I
agree with the author, petty pedantic cheap shots are no substitute for good
arguments. (BTW - I use an authoring program that allows me to edit the text
directly, mostly writing in raw HTML these days, but it's handy to still have
the preview function there)
>
> You pedant, does it seem easy to make mistakes now?
>
> C.
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plesae suggest V.35 sync card for Linux?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 22:46:45 -0600
Mark Lo wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I wish to setup Linux PC to work for a router is
> because I found that a very low-end model of a PC would have much powerful
> than any expensive router. I checked Cisco 2501 which was quoted by my ISP.
> That model is running 20MHz 68030 4MB DRam and the system bus ??MHz. The
> quoted price is about us$1500 (us$2240 - services charge?). For the similar
> price, I could have a PC of 300MHz 64MB Ram with a useful syn. card. But
> acutally, I think a PC of 100MHz 16 MB Ram is much enough comparing to all
> model of Cisco. As I will have a website working as busy as yahoo. :-) I
> concern the performance as well as the price. Is there a website to sell used
> router? I couldn't find place in my city to trade used router. You have much
> knowledge on router but I am new on router. Which router is suitable for a
> busy website? How about IBM 2210 which is also quoted by my ISP? My final
> concerned problem is my ISP said they don't promise they can configure any
> other router or Linux PC.
>
> If people would buy and sell Cisco routers, maybe I can sell my router after
> a period also. Well, any suggestion?
>
> Thanks again for your suggestion and I am much appreciated.
> mark @ chevalier.net
Mark,
Take a look at www.ebay.com a lot of routers are sold there . You might want to
reconsider your position however. I have nine routers in my lab, and one linux
box configured as a router and in no instance can I get better performance from
the Linux box. And thats doesn't mean for an instant that Linux is the problem.
A router is hardend, requires no hard disk, no filesystems, respond much better
to power outages and their IP stack is optimised.
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 256-3219 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: Paul Miyasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 21:09:48 -0500
Check resources on both machines. I noticed that your NIC on Linux machine has an IRQ
of 3. This is usually
reserved for a COM port. You might want to try changing the IRQ for your NIC
Paul
John Hopkins wrote:
> Hmm... I will keep that in mind for future, but I don't think I need
> routing done here. As I said, I don't care if the private network
> between linux and Win95 can see the 'net, even though my second network
> card on Win95 can. I just want to be able to connect to things on linux
> (eg. webserver development, ftp, etc...).
> I've even removed the Internet NIC from Win95 (not physically, via the
> control panel) and tried my local network. Still they couldn't ping
> each other. So I'm guessing that the second NIC in the Win95 box
> doesn't have an effect on the private network (tell me if I'm wrong)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> Paul Miyasaki wrote:
> >
> > So You got 2 NIC in your Win95 machine. I assume this is the case. If so, then
>are they both on the same
> > network ie. NIC1 10.2.2.2, NIC2 10.2.2.1. The problem is probably the Win95
>machine. If you have two
> > different networks under Win95 this could be a problem because Win95 doesn't do
>routing. There is a
> > registery hack for this, but I have tried it but didn't get it to work. The
>easiest thing to do would be to
> > buy a cheap 10MB hub and eliminate one of the NIC cards.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > John Hopkins wrote:
> >
> > > I should also mention that I'm running Red Hat Linux 4.2 and the network
> > > card was detected fine. It is an NE2000 compatible card, 10Mbit.
> > >
> > > John Hopkins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to setup a simple tcp/ip LAN with my Win95 and Linux machines
> > > > . On the Win95, I have an ethernet connection for my cable modem, and
> > > > another network card connecting to the linux. I don't care if I can get
> > > > to the net from the linux box, I just want the two machines to be able
> > > > to connect together. Ping doesn't see the other machine from either
> > > > one.
> > > >
> > > > Win95's ip: 10.2.2.3
> > > > Linux's ip: 10.2.2.2
> > > >
> > > > Here is some information I gathered from the Linux machine:
> > > >
> > > > FILE: /proc/net/route
> > > > ---------------------
> > > >
> > > > Iface Destination Gateway Flags RefCnt Use Metric Mask
> MTU Window
> > > > IRTT
> > > > lo 0000007F 00000000 01 0 4 0
>000000FF 3584 0
> > > > 0
> > > > eth0 0000000A 00000000 01 0 5 0
>000000FF 1500 0
> > > > 0
> > > >
> > > > OUTPUT OF ifconfig
> > > > ------------------
> > > >
> > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > > UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> > > > RX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > TX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > >
> > > > eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:A8:35:A0:EF
> > > > inet addr:10.2.2.2 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > Interrupt:3 Base address:0x320
> > > >
> > > > OUTPUT OF netstat -r
> > > > --------------------
> > > >
> > > > Kernel IP routing table
> > > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> > > > Iface
> > > > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
> > > > lo
> > > > 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 1500 0 0
> > > > eth0
> > > >
> > > > I tried shoving the Win95 network card id into ARP on linux, but that
> > > > didn't even help (not sure if it would help anyway).
> > > > Hope someone can help - I've been reading all the relevant HOWTO's and
> > > > trying to get this to work for a long time.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a million!
> > > >
> > > > John
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
