Linux-Networking Digest #356, Volume #10 Tue, 2 Mar 99 19:13:41 EST
Contents:
Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
pppd and frames with bad fcs (Rich Fellinger)
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Hans)
Re: IP Masquerading: losing connections? (Rick Onanian)
Re: Linux firewall software recommendation. (Rick Onanian)
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Rick Onanian)
How can I disable automatic routing? (Andre Hinrichs)
dhcpd.leases error
Re: Linux as the file and internet server with win NT/95/98 clients ("Capn Crunch")
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Rick Onanian)
Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? (Roger Gammans)
Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this ("Rufus V. Smith")
ipppd server DNS not working?? (Michael Vogwell)
Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: moms message ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
firewall + ICQ (Haaino Beljaars)
Re: Ftp problem, root cannot login across telnet (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: demand dialling is not supported by kernel driver version 2.2.0 (Clifford Kite)
Re: PPP MSCHAP and NT (Clifford Kite)
Re: Newbie -- Samba Password ? (David Kirkpatrick)
ncpmount kills my system. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
glibc-2.0 and debugging resolver ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.x,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:12:57 GMT
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 09:53:31 +0000, Jason Clifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Care to explain how... EQL is NOT ML-PPP and the ML-PPP driver for
>> linux only works in kernel 2.1.36-2.1.48 and was incompleate. do you
>> know something we don't?
actually, yes.
the eql driver can bond channels for outgoing traffic ONLY! and the
channels do not have to be ppp. you can bond a slip with a ppp or
cslip without much trouble. but it's out going.
the ml-ppp driver for linux can be found at http://mp.ins-coin.de/
And I was wrong about the kernel version. it's 2.1.37 - 2.1.43
tng
------------------------------
From: Rich Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd and frames with bad fcs
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:25:55 -0600
Hello,
system: Red Hat 5.2 installation/Pentium processor/2.0.36 kernel which I
built
I have been successful in using my external 3ComImpact IQ to connect to
my ISP at 128k (both B channels) using pppd. Invoking ifconfig shows my
ppp0 interface active. But whenever I receive packets from my ISP they
are always discarded due to errors. Using 'kdebug 7' as an option to
pppd I was able to see the errors in a log file, here is one (all the
rest are the same except for the XXXX part):
Mar 1 18:46:21 superbox kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, excess = XXXX
Can my pppd problem be diagnosed with this information? If so, can
someone offer an explanation and a fix?
Thanks,
Rich Fellinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 15:44:46 +0100
Greg Weeks wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi, i'm new with the IP forwarding thing.
> > I have 2 computers on my small network, I would like to map incoming
> > telnet connections on the 192.168.0.1 port 8023 (computer connected to
> > internet) to the computer 192.168.0.2 port 23.
> > I've tried everything with ipfwadm with no success at all. Do you have
> > any suggestions?
>
> ipportfw or one of the userland forwarding proxies like redir or rinet.
>
> Greg Weeks
> --
> http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
Can you tell me where I could find a binary/compilable version? Or if you
have it mail it to me please.
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading: losing connections?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:42:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've set up Linux boxes with IP Masquerading to act as cable modem routers
> for small LANs before, and they've always worked fine. Recently, I set one
> up for my neighbor, who happens to be on the same cable-modem segment as I
> am, and his works for awhile (12-24 hours), then eventually stops working.
<snippage>
It's not the correct solution to the problem, but one workaround would
be to set the linux box to automatically reboot itself every twelve
hours or so... man cron
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux firewall software recommendation.
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:44:33 -0500
Glenn Mathison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a linux server that I want to put a firewall onto. Could
> anyone please suggest a good firewall package that I could use?
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Glenn
Well, a good linux firewall package is linux. Firewalling is built right
into the kernel, unless you compiled one without it. Check out the
ipfwadm command.
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:40:06 -0500
Hans wrote:
>
> Hi, i'm new with the IP forwarding thing.
> I have 2 computers on my small network, I would like to map incoming
> telnet connections on the 192.168.0.1 port 8023 (computer connected to
> internet) to the computer 192.168.0.2 port 23.
> I've tried everything with ipfwadm with no success at all. Do you have
> any suggestions?
> Thanks in advance.
> Hans.
Assuming you have regular IP Masquerading running correctly, and the
internal machine can make outgoing connections to the internet, all
you then have to do is get your hands on ipportfw, ipautofw, rinetd,
or any of the other port-forwarders. I use ipportfw. It can be found
at:
http://www.monmouth.demon.co.uk/ipsubs/portforwarding.html
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: Andre Hinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How can I disable automatic routing?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:58:13 +0100
Hi!
Due to the behaviour of the new kernel 2.2.x series I have a routing
problem.
I don't want ifconfig to set the route automatically. Somewhere I have
read an article of Alan Cox stated that he added a feature to disable
the automatic routing, but I didn't find out, how.
Can somebody help, please?
Thanks
Andre
--
Andre Hinrichs
_/ _/ _/ Ericsson Eurolab Deutschland GmbH
_/ _/ _/ Daimlerring 9 Phone: +49-5121-707-353
_/ _/ _/ 31135 Hildesheim Fax: +49-5121-707-xxx
_/ _/ _/ Germany Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dhcpd.leases error
Date: 2 Mar 1999 22:31:30 GMT
I am trying to make my Linux machine the DHCP server on my NT / W95
Network. Everything seemed to install correctly but when the machine boots
the following message appears:
Can't open lease database /etc/dhcpd.leases: No such file or directory --
check for failed database rewrite attempt!
How do I create the dhcpd.leases file????
Don Hurst
Colorado Springs Christian Schools
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Capn Crunch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as the file and internet server with win NT/95/98 clients
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:27:48 -0500
I missed the answer... can you email me the response?
THanks
John
Joe wrote in message <7bfdsn$168$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Thank you for the advice. It should be interesting if this happens. I
have
>looking Linux over and it seems to have some good qualities.
>
>I'll keep you advised.
>Thanks,
>
>Joseph Norcott
>Business Technologies Of New England, Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.btne.com
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 10:10:04 -0500
rick wrote:
>
> ipfwadm is what you would use. add a forwarding ruleset to it
I'm curious to find out how to do this with ipfwadm. Can you provide us
with any details? I've had to use port forwarding programs to accomplish
this, but I've always thought ipfwadm should be able to do it...
> Hans wrote:
>
> > Hi, i'm new with the IP forwarding thing.
> > I have 2 computers on my small network, I would like to map incoming
> > telnet connections on the 192.168.0.1 port 8023 (computer connected to
> > internet) to the computer 192.168.0.2 port 23.
> > I've tried everything with ipfwadm with no success at all. Do you have
> > any suggestions?
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Hans.
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: Roger Gammans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.x,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:50:23 +0000
In article <7bf811$67r0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bill davidsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>That may have been a feature of his Livingston Portmaster, but I don't
>think balancing is a feature of EQL per se, any packet will be accepted
>on any line.
>From my reading of eql.c it appears to attempt to balance the %used
ratio on each of the connections that it encapsulates for outgoing data,
and for incoming data I didn't think it did anything at all. e.g. It
accepts all packets no matter which link they were transmitted on -
which makes sense when you think about.
TTFN
--
Roger Gammans
------------------------------
From: "Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:08:48 -0500
I clicked on:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/ldp.html
and got
404 : FILE NOT FOUND
Rufus
Snoopy :-)) wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Accept My Congradulations :-))
>I am sure that the Newbies who will be fortunate enough to read your Post
>and go to the suggested Link will probobly remember you with gratitude for
a
>long time...
> ... But I've found another
>Place on the Web which I think is even better, since here you can find the
>above mentioned Guide and also download the whole Guide in many different
>Formats (I prefer the HTML) in addition you will find many other Goodies
>:-))
>Here it is: http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/ldp.htm
------------------------------
From: Michael Vogwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm,isdn4linux
Subject: ipppd server DNS not working??
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 15:17:57 +0000
Hi,
I have managed to get isdn4linux working for a dialup server, I dial in using
Winows NT4.0.
My problem is that I can telnet to machines on the internal network using the
full numeric address but not
the name. The routing seems to work OK and I can run X sessions and netscape OK.
Curiously Netscape uses a proxy server which does seem to be happily recognised
as an IP name ??.
For this example my server is 10.0.2.2
my dns server is 10.0.2.4 and 10.0.2.5
I assign 10.0.2.7 and 10.0.2.8 dynamically to the remote dial in machine.
This is the content of my ioptions file
==========================
auth
-chap
+pap
login
debug
lock
proxyarp
ms-dns 10.0.2.4
ms-dns 10.0.2.5
==========================
Here is my isdn-up script
==========================
#!/bin/sh
#
echo "Starting isdn4linux"
/sbin/isdnlog -m16 /dev/isdnctrl0 2>> /var/log/isdncalls &
echo "configuring device ippp0 for dialin"
/sbin/isdnctrl addif ippp0
/sbin/isdnctrl eaz ippp0 123456
/sbin/isdnctrl addphone ippp0 in "*"
/sbin/isdnctrl l2_prot ippp0 hdlc
/sbin/isdnctrl l3_prot ippp0 trans
/sbin/isdnctrl encap ippp0 syncppp
/sbin/isdnctrl secure ippp0 off
/sbin/isdnctrl huptimeout ippp0 300
#/sbin/isdnctrl callback ippp0 in
#/sbin/isdnctrl cbhup ippp0 on
#/sbin/isdnctrl cbdelay ippp0 5
#/sbin/isdnctrl chargehup ippp0 off
/sbin/ifconfig ippp0 10.0.2.2 pointopoint 10.0.2.7
/sbin/route add -host 10.0.2.7 ippp0
echo "configuring device ippp0 for dialin"
/sbin/isdnctrl addif ippp1
/sbin/isdnctrl eaz ippp1 123456
/sbin/isdnctrl addphone ippp1 in "*"
/sbin/isdnctrl l2_prot ippp1 hdlc
/sbin/isdnctrl l3_prot ippp1 trans
/sbin/isdnctrl encap ippp1 syncppp
/sbin/isdnctrl secure ippp1 off
/sbin/isdnctrl huptimeout ippp1 300
#/sbin/isdnctrl callback ippp1 in
#/sbin/isdnctrl cbhup ippp1 on
#/sbin/isdnctrl cbdelay ippp1 5
#/sbin/isdnctrl chargehup ippp1 off
/sbin/ifconfig ippp1 10.0.2.2 pointopoint 10.0.2.8
/sbin/route add -host 10.0.2.8 ippp1
echo "starting first ipppd for dialin"
/sbin/ipppd useifip debug \
auth +pap -bsdcomp\
-vj +mp -defaultroute debug \
/dev/ippp0
echo "starting second ipppd for dialin"
/sbin/ipppd useifip debug \
auth +pap -bsdcomp\
-vj +mp -defaultroute debug \
/dev/ippp1
echo "binding ipppds explicitly to devices"
echo `/sbin/isdnctrl pppbind ippp0 0`
echo `/sbin/isdnctrl pppbind ippp1 1`
==========================
Also, but not a problem, I am interested in getting the BSD compression working,
as well as callback and MPPP with the
NT4.0 machine dialing in. Callback I think is not supported as the callback
type? is (6) which the man pages says is not supported.
How buggy is the BSD Comp ? and any hints on MPPP with a NT client ??
Thanks for any help
Mike
--
Mike Vogwell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ericsson http://sdc.ericsson.se/
Swindon Design Centre Tel.No. +44 1793 494521
Fax.No. +44 1793 490151
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 22:55:48 GMT
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:11:21 -0500, "Michael T. Spears"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>the eql driver can bond channels for outgoing traffic ONLY! and the
>>channels do not have to be ppp. you can bond a slip with a ppp or
>>cslip without much trouble. but it's out going.
>
>
>
>So are you saying that MultiLink situations are always one way? In other
>words, I have to combine my two channels out and the ISP has to combine them
>for the return path?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
yes. but the ML-PPP is supose to send a channel bonding request to
the peer to establish the multi-link connection. EQL simply ties the
two on our end together for outgoing
tng
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: moms message
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 22:13:17 GMT
On Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:15:47 -0800, Ronald Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope the right person gets to see this too...LOL
>Hi Laurie, Give Shannan a big hug for me, I know you'll be glad when her
>sleeping
>is back on shedule. You guys always were pretty good sleepers too.
>Bye the way
>Dad found a message you had sent to me on another program but he says
>he doesn't
>want to go in there yet, so I have to wait. I don't know how long it's
>been there, It
>looked like a long joke or story, when I can get to it, I'll respond to
>it. Laurie, It's fun
>to go somewhere, but it's always fun to get back home isn't it. ha
>ha Bye the way
>Laurie, I'm curious, do you get these e mail's at work or at home.
>Hopefully, tomorrow
>will be our last day of training. Boy I sure hope so. What two weeks
>will Brian be gone?
>Oh oh, have to go, bye for now, love MOM XO
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 22:10:11 GMT
On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 02:13:25 GMT, John Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
at this point, I would check the cables. are you using just coax or a
10baseT RJ45 rollover cable.
tng
>
>Yes - I just double-checked now and there is definitely no conflict. In
>fact, I've already removed my sound card and modem. On the Win95 box, I
>can ping 10.2.2.3 fine too. Just not 10.2.2.2 (linux). :(
>Perhaps my selection of ip's is at fault? I set the subnet mask to
>255.0.0.0, which should be correct according to what I've read, as a
>class A network address?
>At least we're narrowing things down; thanks.
>
>John
>
>
>Paul Miyasaki wrote:
>>
>> Have tried to see if the there is some kind of resource conflict on Win95 machine
>>
>> John Hopkins wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm... I will keep that in mind for future, but I don't think I need
>> > routing done here. As I said, I don't care if the private network
>> > between linux and Win95 can see the 'net, even though my second network
>> > card on Win95 can. I just want to be able to connect to things on linux
>> > (eg. webserver development, ftp, etc...).
>> > I've even removed the Internet NIC from Win95 (not physically, via the
>> > control panel) and tried my local network. Still they couldn't ping
>> > each other. So I'm guessing that the second NIC in the Win95 box
>> > doesn't have an effect on the private network (tell me if I'm wrong)?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > Paul Miyasaki wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So You got 2 NIC in your Win95 machine. I assume this is the case. If so,
>then are they both on the same
>> > > network ie. NIC1 10.2.2.2, NIC2 10.2.2.1. The problem is probably the Win95
>machine. If you have two
>> > > different networks under Win95 this could be a problem because Win95 doesn't do
>routing. There is a
>> > > registery hack for this, but I have tried it but didn't get it to work. The
>easiest thing to do would be to
>> > > buy a cheap 10MB hub and eliminate one of the NIC cards.
>> > >
>> > > Paul
>> > >
------------------------------
From: Haaino Beljaars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: firewall + ICQ
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 15:35:44 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have my RH 5.2 system configured as a router to my NT machine. On that
machine I run ICQ. Which ports does ICQ use, because I forward
everything to my NT machine but that is not what I want. Can anybody
help me out? Are there some modules I can use, and if so how?
--
Greetings from Haaino Beljaars
Home Page: HTTP://www.phys.uu.nl/~beljaars/
I am pro Open Source Software
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ftp problem, root cannot login across telnet
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 10:15:49 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deb,
Have you setup ftpaccess and others (ftphosts) see /etc/ftp*.
See the man pages for these things: man ftpaccess and
NET-3-HOWTO. search on ftpusers. This should stop the security
message. Not sure on the missing file, 5.2 has it there.
Deb Bhakta wrote:
>
> I am new in Linux. Have managed to set up Linux 5.0.
> I can telnet to it from Win98. I can also see and use linux directories
> shared using Samba, after fixing the security problem.
>
> But I cant get the ftp to work.
>
> I also can not login as root on a telnet session (I keep getting "Login
> incorrect" message, I can login as root on the console.
>
> With ftp I first get the message "Connected to hostlx" and then the very
> next line after a second "Connection closed by remote host". The user
> name and password for microsoft networking on Win98 is same as an
> existing user name/password on linux.
>
> After each ftp attempt in /var/log/secure file I get two entries saying
> "hostlx in.ftpd[475]: connect from 200.1.1.1" and "hostlx in.ftpd[476]:
> error: cannot execute /usr/sbin/in.ftpd: No such file or directory".
>
> Looking at file list, there is no /usr/sbin/in.ftpd. But there is one
> /usr/sbin/in.tftpd. So I soft-linked /usr/sbin/in.ftpd to
> /usr/sbin/tftpd.
>
> But this only stopped the second error line in /var/log/secure file.
> Nothing else changed.
>
> I am probably doing something silly, but sure need help.
>
> Thanks in advance guys.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: demand dialling is not supported by kernel driver version 2.2.0
Date: 2 Mar 1999 08:52:26 -0600
Manfred Bene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: When I try ping :10.0.0.1 I alway get the messages as written in
: subject.
: I installed Suse 6.0 and Slackware 3.6 and have with both troubles on
: dialling on demand. Suse uses kernel 2.0.36 and pppd 2.3.5, Slackware
: uses kernel 2.0.35 and pppd 2.3.5. ppp support is included in kernel. I
The kernel support is /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/ppp.c and, for the 2.0.x
kernels, the one that comes with the kernel doesn't support demand dialing.
The ppp-2.3.5 source package has a ppp.c that does support demand dialing
but pppd 2.3.5 will work with a kernel compiled with either one.
The ppp-2.3.5 source can be found at
ftp://cs.anu.edu.au/pub/software/ppp/
You'll have to recompile the kernel to get the demand support and there
are problems with the ppp-2.3.5 ppp.c installation and with the ppp.c
versioning code.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP MSCHAP and NT
Date: 2 Mar 1999 09:09:01 -0600
BK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: rsg wrote:
: > Here is the output from ppplog:
: > Jan 24 14:57:31 rubens pppd[865]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: > Jan 24 14:57:31 rubens pppd[865]: Using interface ppp0
: > Jan 24 14:57:31 rubens pppd[865]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp2
: > Jan 24 14:57:31 rubens pppd[865]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
: > 0xffff8c18> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: > Jan 24 14:57:58 rubens last message repeated 9 times
: > Jan 24 14:58:01 rubens pppd[865]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
: > Jan 24 14:58:01 rubens pppd[865]: Connection terminated.
: > Jan 24 14:58:02 rubens pppd[865]: Exit.
: My experience the last two days is almost identical to the above. I've
: read the README.MSCHAP80 file and done everything it says (supposedly).
: I've re-compiled pppd with the MSCHAP options uncommented. And I've
: "made" the DES libraries. I just get a LCP: timeout sending Config-
: Requests. Any help anyone?
It's not a MSCHAP problem - yet. Pppd is sending the initial ppp
negotiation request and the NT is not responding or sending any of it's
own. This likely means that NT never really connected due to something
wrong in the chat script. Look for clues in the chat messages, they
are in /var/log/messages here.
ONe subtle thing that causes some ISPs trouble is <CONNECT ''> which
sends an extra carriage return. Try replacing it with <CONNECT \d\c>
or <CONNECT \\d\\c> depending on where chat gets the scriping from.
See "man chat" for the meanings of \d and \c .
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie -- Samba Password ?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 10:21:28 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See smbpasswd - its required. You have to log in from the MS
machine each startup unless you map the drive where you give it a
password and its remembered. Not sure about 98 machines but you
have to match encryption in smb.conf encrypt passwords = yes.
Have you setup your shares in the bottom section of the smb.conf?
Not sure about the not configures eth0. Not enough info. What
does the network look like and what's route report and what
specifically is the complaint.
"R.H." wrote:
>
> Why is it when I try to connect to my linux machine in Network
> Neighborhood on my Win98 machine, it asks for a password? And how would
> I find out what that password is?
>
> Also, when my linux machine boots up I get a subnet not configured on
> Eth0?
>
> Thanks,
> Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ncpmount kills my system.
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 14:36:42 GMT
Greetings to all venerable Linux gurus... :)
I am running redhat version 4.2 kernel 2.0.35 and I've kept up with most
of the patches for this version of redhat.
My system has in it a adaptech SCSI card, the 2690 I think, and SCSI
disk, CD, and tape. Our network environment has Novell servers running
Netware 4.11 and older versions, also several Novell SFT servers.
The problem happens after I use ncpmount to mont a drive from one of the
SFT servers to my Linux box. I can mount the drive, use it, then unmount
it with no problems... BUT everytime I do this, my Linux box will crash
within 24 hours of me having used ncpmount. If I do not use ncpmount, the
Linux box runs for months without problems.
When it crashes, it just stops running. No panic message, nothing in the
log files, it just dies silently.
I have a theory. Maybe the SFT server thinks my linux box is a workstation
and sends it a IPX packet that Linux doesn't know how to handle?
I would love to hear from people who are knowledgeable about this stuff,
any help would be appreciated.
Bing
PS Long live Linux, death to micro$oft win9*
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: glibc-2.0 and debugging resolver
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:36:41 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hi
I'm using glibc-2.0 and I would like to know where the debug messages are
sent when using the "options debug" paremeters of resolver
My exact configuration is:
options debug
search uv.es
nameserver 147.156.1.1
nameserver 147.156.122.64
nameserver 130.206.1.2
I downloaded the source of glibc-2.0 and I only see the function ftp_resstat
wich seems to be not used everywhere, also I traced _the library calls_
and I did not see any use of this of syslog functions...
Any comment will be greatly appreciated
Thanks in advance,
Ulisses
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: latin1
Comment: PGP public key available at http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver
iQB1AwUBNtwFjQ/N+5+NQ63pAQGjCgL/eQb9iiOcamzcoAvOlpbQU6kYlXLz6Nbz
ja8fFerHXv4AaW4+jmZWpZ5nacUl2q5NV7vLhED9AQ9MpxMRd0xY0aL74vvnlkWv
Racq7X6N63r2LSDfnRi1TAbyN72ti5yh
=bVe8
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
