Linux-Networking Digest #393, Volume #10 Sat, 6 Mar 99 01:13:37 EST
Contents:
How to block IGMP? (Carl Kreider)
Re: 3c905b-tx nic (Dan Murphy)
Re: Intel EtherExpressPro and Linux 2.2.2 (Paul Heinlein)
Re: ftp problem with redhat 5.2/mandrake (jedi)
Re: Won't let me telnet into RedHat 5.2 Telnet as root, Whare are the configureation
files for this? (jedi)
Re: Help! How do I build a tulip ethernet driver under REDHAT ? ("Jeff")
Print Server "hang-up" (class)
Re: RedHat Control panel runaway. (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: debugging IP_Masq and Portforwarding (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Linux VERY slow to boot (Erhard Siegl)
KDE pppd Problem ("dooogh!")
Re: Samba server for Windows clients ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How to stop LPRng from printing banners to a networked HP 8100N?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Intermitent problem with dhcpcd v1.3 (Nick)
Name server problem (James Stakelum)
Re: dhcp in RH5.2 (Steve Irwin)
Re: Network Card ("tonni")
Re: Using MS-Outlook as email client, now how to configure Linux server? (Chris
Cocozzo)
Realvideo Server G2 - HELP (urgent) (Wim Borgers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carl Kreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to block IGMP?
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:08:21 -0500
Recently GTE has taken to sending packets every 30 sec while
I have the link up. These are addressed to 224.0.0.1 and keep
the link up (I use diald). I thought ipmasq would be the "right"
way to deal with them - diald should never even see them. After
lots of digging and resesarch, I used this set of rules:
ipfwadm -I -a deny -D 224.0.0.1
ipfwadm -I -a deny -S 224.0.0.1
ipfwadm -O -a deny -D 224.0.0.1
ipfwadm -O -a deny -S 224.0.0.1
but this did not stop the packets. Why? Is it because I have a
forward rule that gets checked first?
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 172.17.0.0/20 -D 0.0.0.0/0
I ended up, after a lot more study, using a rule in diald to ignore
any packet with ip.protocol=2 which seems to work, but it bothers me
that I couldn't make the ipmasq solution work.
--
Carl Kreider
aka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================================================
"NT disaster recovery isn't all that difficult. Just follow the
simple instructions that come with the Linux CD."
Anonymous
============================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Murphy)
Subject: Re: 3c905b-tx nic
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 03:43:05 GMT
Kevin,
>From the guy who wrote the driver:
(http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/modules.html#ffff)
What if the card is detected with a ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff station address?
There are three known causes of this problem.
Warm-booting from Win95 OSR2.1 or Win98 (power-managed cards
only)
"PnP OS" is set in the PCI BIOS setup.
Broken PCI BIOSes (reportedly version "AI78" is broken).
The "D3-cold" problem
Quick summary: restore operation by unplugging the machine after
running an OS that disables the card. Merely using the
"soft-off" pushbutton on a ATX case is not sufficient.
Many modern PCI chips have ACPI power management capability. Some
include a mode known as "D3-cold", where the
chip can power itself off. When in this mode the chip uses only the
tiny amount of stand-by power always available when an
ATX power supply is plugged in. In the D3-cold mode the chip can be
turned on only by writing a PCI configuration space
register. This works great if you have a ACPI-aware BIOS that knows
how to re-enable the chip on a warm boot, but older
BIOS don't know that the chip cannot retain configuration information.
When the machine is warm booted the chip has only
invalid configuration information.
The PnP OS problem occurs because Microsoft has convinced BIOS makers
to modify their PCI device configuration from
the previous rational standard, to one that works well only with
Microsoft operating systems. Where previously the BIOS
allocated resources for and enabled the PCI device by default, it now
does so only for boot devices and audio devices. (Why
are audio devices specifically an exception? Because MS-Windows can't
handle the resource allocation for them!)
The solution is to either update to the latest driver, (the drivers
are being re-worked to enable the devices) or to disable the
"PnP OS" setting in the machine's BIOS setup.
The reason Microsoft had to have this change implemented for them was
that MS-Windows still handles some devices with
"real-mode" drivers, and this change makes it easier to mix real-mode
and protected-mode device drivers. This is an excellent
example of Microsoft using its dominant position in the software
industry force a technical change that is detrimental to other
operating systems.
Hasta,
DLM
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 14:05:04 -0800, w00t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a prob with the 3c905b nic card. Let say I'm in win98 and I
>reboot into slack. When it his my nic card I get a ff:ff:ff:**** irq11
>error. Now if I disable the damn nic card in win98 reboot back into
>win98 then reboot once more back into slack my nic seems to work.
>Everyone tells me it is plug and prey but all of that is turned off from
>what I can tell.
>
>
>Has anyone solved this problem. It seems that there is about 3 people
>here at work that is having this problem..
>
>Out.
>Kevin
>
>
------------------------------
From: Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpressPro and Linux 2.2.2
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 16:04:25 -0800
David Knutson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with Linux 2.2.2 loading the driver for an Intel
> EtherExpressPro/10 ISA card. It locks up the box every time I try to load
> the module for it. Has anyone else come across this? I've been using one
> of these cards in the 2.0 series kernels with no problems. I've also
> tried it on two different machines and had the same problem. I'm completely
> baffled and mystified. I've been using Linux for 5+ years with no
> problems like this. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm only half-way through a related problem, so this may or may
not help.
I've got two identical Pro 100B cards stuck in two Linux boxes,
one running 2.0.36, one 2.2.1, connected via a Cat-5 crossover cable.
The 2.2.1 box would always lock up during large file transfers.
Oddly, the same thing would happen when I booted the 2.2.1 box into
NT4 and attempted similar transfers.
My interim solution is to specify things at bootup and not let the
cards autonegotiate speed and duplexity (is that a word?). Doing
so has prevented both Linux and NT from crashing. On the Linux
side, I've got the driver compiled into the kernel rather than
as a module, so I've got to pass lilo the parameters. This is
what works with the 100:
ether=0,0,[hex of choice, 0x30 for me],[interface, e.g,. eth0]
I'm unsure to what extent you can do the same thing on the 10.
--
Paul Heinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oregon Graduate Institute of Science & Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Computing Facilities Support Team
http://cse.ogi.edu/~heinlein/ 503-690-1199
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: ftp problem with redhat 5.2/mandrake
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:37:59 -0800
On 6 Mar 1999 04:19:26 GMT, BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.networking jedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: On 6 Mar 1999 03:06:21 GMT, BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: >after a new install of 5.2 RH (I used 4.2 for the last 2 yrs) my inbound ftp
>: >is not working. no matter what I try, the connection is refused.
>: >
>: >what things should I look for? is PAM more picky than it was in RH4.2 days?
>: >
>: >I'm not even trying to ftp to the root acct, I created a nonpriv user and ftpd
>: >won't even let me login as that..
>: >
>: >in.ftpd is there and inetd.conf has the entry uncommented. the user is NOT in
>: >/etc/ftpusers. ftphosts is empty. ftpgroups is empty.
>: >
>: >what else does redhat5.2 (mandrake, actually) need so that I can enable
>: >inbound ftp's to my site?
>
>: Make an appropriate subdirectory in /home/ftp/pub/.
>
>I'll have to try that on another install. the way I fixed this problem was to
>download the SRPM and rebuild from src. it then finally worked ;-)
>
>so are you saying it was a CWD problem? strange... you'd think that the
>standard redhat install would not have this problem. I can't believe I'm the
>only one seeing ftpd failures out-of-the box.
On redhat 5.x, anon ftp should be enabled and active by default.
Uploads merely require a place for them to go where the guest
user has write priveledge.
Mandrake may have changed this for security purposes.
--
Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats
Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out / | \
as soon as your grip slips.
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Subject: Re: Won't let me telnet into RedHat 5.2 Telnet as root, Whare are the
configureation files for this?
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:38:16 -0800
On 6 Mar 1999 04:20:26 GMT, BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>/etc/security/access.conf, maybe?
>
>TSetliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: I would like to find out whare the configuration files are for telnet under
>: Red Hat 5.2 so that I could posibly set it up to let me telnet in as root.
>: I looked around a little however with no luck. So if you could tell me I
>: would be greatfull.
>: -Tom
>
>
--
Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats
Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out / | \
as soon as your grip slips.
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! How do I build a tulip ethernet driver under REDHAT ?
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:00:06 -0500
I may be wrong but the tulip.c code that came with the NetGear NIC is the
public code...it's just that it's several months old (mine was dated from
August '98 and I bought mine a few weeks ago). The current tulip.c code is
dated something like Feb 24 '99. I just downloaded and compiled it and
everything works fine. But I did have to use the compile command found at
the end of the source code (do a tail of tulip.c and you'll see it) and not
the compile command instucted by NetGear et al.
Jeff
Tim Myrtle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7bp4dl$oh7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Lenny-
>
>I am running RedHat 5.2, upgraded to the 2.2 kernel on my server. I am
>using the public tulip driver included with 2.2. I saw the note that came
>with the card to use the Netgear drivers, but so far I have had no problems
>with the public driver.
>
>Is there really a reason to use the Netgear drivers?
>
>Tim Myrtle
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>lenny wintfeld wrote:
>>
>> Hi-
>>
>> I've got to build a revised tulip driver for my Netgear FA310tx
>> ethernet card. Evidently I need v .89 or higher & I've got v .88 now. The
>> instructions that came with the driver are very clear but are for non
>> RPM linux's. Can you give me instructions on how to do the build under
>> REDHAT's quite different file tree?
>>
>> The instructions that come with the driver on Netgears floppy are as
>> follows (verbatim):
>>
>
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: class <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Print Server "hang-up"
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 16:45:18 -0800
Kern 2.0.34
I have a NetaTalk and SMB on my Linux Box. Sometimes my print server
doesn't want to print buy it does spool to the printspool.
In the printcap file I have included
:mx#0
Still it gets stuck. Any suggestions?
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat Control panel runaway.
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:16:20 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm guessing but its may be RH startx scripts ran and the default
is to put up the conrtol pannel. Look at
/etc/X11/AnotherLevel/fvwm2rc.init.m4 and comment out the exec of
the control pannel.
d
Glen Ward wrote:
>
> I have a RH5.2 firewall system setup with no monitor, keyboard or mouse,
> but have Xfree86 running to serve my x-term network connection.
> Most times on connection I see one or more processes named
> 'control panel (something-or-other)' using up a lot of CPU time, so I
> kill it.
>
> Is there some way of preventing this process from starting ?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Glen Ward
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: debugging IP_Masq and Portforwarding
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:18:06 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can do some initial monitoring with tcpdump -i eth0 etc.
Derek Ealy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been running IP Masquerading on my RH Linux 5.1 machine for a few
> months now. Had everything working FTP and even was able to establish
> VPN connections from NT machines through the Linux gateway out to
> other NT machines. Last weekend I decided to try to bring my web site
> to my internal network and would like to run in on NT and IIS4. This
> means that I need to route http traffic through my Linux gateway to
> the IIS box on my internal network.
>
> Ever since I began this endeavor I've had tons of problems.
> Masquerading seems to work ok, but I can no longer FTP from my
> internal Windows machines to other machines on the Internet. My VPN no
> longer connects to one of my clients sites. And I've never been able
> to successfully get my http traffic routed to the IIS machine. I've
> tried individually installing rinetd, ipportfw and ippfvs (Linux
> Virtual Server), on my upgraded 2.0.36 kernel. None of these have done
> the trick. I assume that this is just a bit of configuration ignorance
> on my part. I need suggestions on how to track down where the problem
> really lies.
>
> What tools are there available that will allow me to trace where
> packets are going on my network? I need to know if things are actually
> making through the firewall coming, or if they are being stopped going
> out.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks, Derek
>
> http://www.grandprixsw.com
> Anti spam notification:
> Please don't just hit reply to send me email. Remove the despaminator (nospam.)
> from my email address. My correct addr is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Erhard Siegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux VERY slow to boot
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 20:27:20 +0100
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999, "Craig Shields" wrote:
>>It's a DNS lookup problem.
>>Enter your IP's in /etc/hosts, and set /etc/host.conf to "order hosts,
>bind".
>
>Can I enter both of my IP's so that I don't have to change it manually each
>time? If not, is there any other way of doing this?.... i.e., some utility
>I can install.
You can use more than one IP-address for one net-device. You might
want to read the mini-howto IP-Alias.
Greetings
Erhard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Doubt is not a pleasant mental state, but certainty is a ridiculous one."
-Voltaire
------------------------------
From: "dooogh!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: KDE pppd Problem
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 19:47:40 -0500
I'm using Mandrake 5.3 with kde desktop. I configured kppd correctly for my
isp, it dials out and establishes a connection to my isp but does not
recieve any data after login name and password. I show 156 bytes of data
recieved in the details. Can't browse or do anything else. I called my isp
but they are not familiar with Kppd. They said that all my setting were
correct though. Any ideas why this is happening????
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba server for Windows clients
Date: 6 Mar 1999 05:44:40 GMT
Patrick Dunford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking of setting up an old 486 as a testbed for something I can
> offer my clients as an alternative to NT Server for small office
> networks. I am sure it is stable and reliable, as long as it can offer
> the same sort of user-level security and so on that is normal in a
> client/server network.
Three weeks after switching from Netware to Win NT Server, I moved our
busiest print queue (servicing a 30 page-per-minute laser) off the Win NT
Server and on to a Linux/Samba server but I tried of hearing, "It's
printing so slowwww." The only change I had to make on the client was
changing the share name in the printer properties. And with Samba 2.0,
they can now join the domain as an NT-style server and use the full NT
security.
--
Charles Rutledge | Liberty is a tenuous gift. Hard to win, easy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | to give away, and no will protect it for you.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to stop LPRng from printing banners to a networked HP 8100N?
Date: 6 Mar 1999 05:49:20 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Dan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to suppress the banner page when printing to an HP 8100N
> laser printer via a jetdirect card. I am using LPRng on a RedHat 5.2
> fully updated box. I have used the options available within
> /etc/printcap and via the lpr command. I can not get it to stop.
I had the same problem. You will also need to telnet in to the JetDirect
card and turn off the banner pages that it generates itself. HP has the
JetDirect generated banner pages turned on by default.
--
Charles Rutledge | Liberty is a tenuous gift. Hard to win, easy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | to give away, and no will protect it for you.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick)
Subject: Intermitent problem with dhcpcd v1.3
Date: 5 Mar 1999 23:51:06 -0600
I'm having some problems with dhcpcd v1.3. I'm running RedHat Linux
5.2 and kernel 2.2.2. Since I upgraded to Linux 2.2.x and dhcpcd v1.3
I started having a problem of it not being able to connect to my cable
modem service about 20 percent of the time that I boot into Linux. If
I boot into Win95 letting it connect, then reboot into Linux, it works
fine. When it doesn't work, it just sits there for a minute and then
when it's finished, it doesn't give any errors. It just doesn't work.
I type dhcpcd -h cx485791
I find it irritating to boot into Linux to find out that I have to
boot into Win95 just to boot back into Linux so can anyone tell me
what's wrong and how to fix it?
------------------------------
From: James Stakelum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Name server problem
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 23:50:06 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============FCAAFA12822A73AAADD44616
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topology:
Two node network
Server configuration:
Redhat 5.2 Linux Intel Pentium II
IP: 192.168.7.3
Host: linux
Domain: privatenet.com
Client configuration:
Windows 98 Pentium II client
IP: 192.168.7.4
DNS server (under TCP/IP configuration): 192.168.7.3
Problem:
Client machine can access server, but only by using IP address. For
example, to open the web page running under Apache server on Linux box,
Netscape on client can open URL http://192.168.7.3, but not http://linux
or http://linux.privatenet.com.
It appears to be a name server issue, but I have read and I believe
accurately followed the RedHat documentation on network configuration,
especially name server configuration.
Any suggestions? Anybody else run into this?
==============FCAAFA12822A73AAADD44616
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="Stakelum.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for James Stakelum
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="Stakelum.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Stakelum;James
tel;home:(972) 733-4993 (Best time to call is evenings or weekends)
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
adr;quoted-printable:;;5353 Keller Springs Road=0D=0ANumber
1526;Dallas;Texas;75248;United States of America
fn:James Lee Stakelum
end:vcard
==============FCAAFA12822A73AAADD44616==
------------------------------
From: Steve Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dhcp in RH5.2
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:05:13 -0800
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts you'll find ifcfg-eth0. There's an entry
there called "IPADDR". It's probably not set. If this value is null, dhcp
attempts to get you a lease. If the ip address is here, it will assign an ip
address at bootup and disable dhcp from assigning one. The script will look
something like the following:
DEVICE=eth0
IPADDR=""
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=172.16.100.0
BROADCAST=172.16.100.255
ONBOOT=yes
Replace the above IPADDR="" with IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where the x's are your
IP address. Then, change directory to /etc/rc.d/init.d and type ./network stop
then ./network start
Hope this helps.
Steve
todda wrote:
> When I set up redhat 5.2 at home I had a NT 4 dhcp server. No I dont have
> dhcp, but every time linux boots it searches for a dhcp server. When it is
> done I end up assigning it an ip using ifconfig.
>
> How can I disable the dhcp search on boot and establish a permanent IP.
>
> btw: I am using kernel 2.2
------------------------------
From: "tonni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network Card
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 01:04:25 GMT
well i have linksys 10/100 and could not be found i find out that is a drive
built in call tulip
and it is werking fine now my ither linux has novell 2000 comparable i just
load for address 0000X nad Y for irq
ps: if you try tulip dont put address or irq there is no need for
just in case if you want to see which cards are suported by tulip go to
www.linksys.com
look fot fast ethernet 10/100 linux drives you will find the link to the
nasa engenieer who developed the code and has a list of chip set and nic
good luck
R. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I just recently installed a Red Hat 5.1 and it did not detect
> my Mycrodyne 16bit 10/100 NE card.
> I now have linux installed but need to get that card working.
> Can someone point me the way to add it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Randall Brooks
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________
> Randall Brooks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.glendinningprods.com
> Senior Engineer
> GMP (843) 399-6146 FAX (843) 399-5005
>
>
------------------------------
From: Chris Cocozzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using MS-Outlook as email client, now how to configure Linux server?
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 22:49:06 -0700
I just finished doing that exact same thing and it works like a champ. If you
already have sendmail and pop3 up and running, then all you need to do is setup
Outlook to point to your mailserver. I am by no means an expert (using Linux
for about 4 months) but I can try to answer specific questions if you have them.
Chris
Curtis Adams wrote:
> Greetings,
> I would like to use MS-Outlook on Windows95 workstations to send/receive
> mail on a local network AND to send/receive mail on the internet (POP3).
> I've got Sendmail running and have installed IMAP. If someone could point me
> in the right direction for doing both, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Thanks!
> Curtis
------------------------------
From: Wim Borgers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Realvideo Server G2 - HELP (urgent)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 03:21:22 +0100
Hello!
Can someone tell me how to view a live broadcast sent to port 4040 of
192.168.0.2 filename: webcam.rm
The Real documentation is at least confusing, and the knowledge base
article describing the exact URL seems to get it wrong...
Does someone have experience with this?
Thanks for any info
Best Regards
Wim
==============================================================================
Wim Borgers PGPKey: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============================================================================
Member & Co-System Administrator of LISA
(Limburg Internet Student Association)
Internet Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KotNet address: http://tvd-10-64-16-19.kotnet.kuleuven.ac.be
http://wibo.tiense.kotnet.org
(KotNet addresses only accessible from within the domain
kuleuven.ac.be and the TVD-network)
Homepage: http://lisa.luc.ac.be/wibo
KotPage: http://lisa.luc.ac.be:8888
______________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
