Linux-Networking Digest #560, Volume #10 Fri, 19 Mar 99 18:13:44 EST
Contents:
Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 (Andy Johnstone)
Re: Recommend Fast Ethernet Card ("Daniel Flinkmann")
Re: Even innocent people need privacy (Leo Cambilargiu)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (**Nick Brown)
TEST AGAIN (Jean-Michel LEON-FOUN-LIN)
Looking for a webcam for linux ("AMJ")
Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux? ("Lee Sharp")
Re: nfs and permissions (Jim Roberts)
Re: FUD ALERT! was Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux? ("Lee Sharp")
********************Set up your own network. 4 10 mb ethernet cards for just $4
each!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!************************* ("Chuck Neal")
Re: "Network unreachable"..... help!! (John McKee)
Re: Recommend Fast Ethernet Card (Colin)
Re: Ascertain actual connect speed, and auto indication of disconnect (Scott Lanning)
Re: Linux NCPFS slowness with CVS imports ("Kevin D. Snodgrass")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** (Craig Dowell)
Netatalk - could I create a new zone? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Firewall And DNS (Edward Lee)
Re: Problem with windows telnet (Michael McConnell)
Re: ISP<->Wingate(WIN NT)<->Linux (Tom Neilson)
Re: ADSL (Greg Weeks)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:48:24 GMT
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my ethernet card working with linux. I have to some
extent, I found a semi-supported .c file as a driver written for it.
The driver worked, under kernel 2.0.36. However, i can't get it to
compile under 2.2.1. Does anyone have any suggestions? I get errors
like SLOW_DOWN_IO not defined, dev_tint not declared, etc. Maybe
someone that knows about drivers can fix it? I tried, but I know too
little about network drivers to understand how I need to fix it. If
anyone is interested email me.
Thanks!
Andy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Remove the nospam. to email me
------------------------------
From: "Daniel Flinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Recommend Fast Ethernet Card
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:49:23 GMT
Jon,
DEC TULIP Chipset ... All Types of ... ( Often used in SMC Cards )
Don't use any Realtek, 3Com, etc ... they can't bring the power and are dumb
cards.
Daniel
Jon Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ct0no$iap$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone recommend a fast PCI Ethernet card for Linux?
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Jon D. Slater QualComm Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6150 Lookout Road
> Phone: (303) 247-5037 Boulder, Colorado
> Fax: (303) 247-5167 80301
------------------------------
From: Leo Cambilargiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Even innocent people need privacy
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:47:22 GMT
I agree with this idea COMPLETELY. If the idea that people do wrong is a
good enough excuse to violate our privacy, and the attitude that if we do
nothing wrong is an excuse for us not to complain, then the violation of
our privacy has nothing to do with being right or wrong. Just someone
elses interest.
The minds behind the observation systems are simply motivated by self
interest, regardless of right or wrong. If you toss money at the man, he
will jump straight into bed.
LCamBilARgiu
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's this attitude that if you're not doing anything wrong, then you
> shouldn't worry about lack of privacy. That's wrong; here are examples.
>
> - Do you want potential thieves to know that you're going on vacation?
> Do you want them to be able to find what alarm company you subscribe to,
> if any?
>
> - Do you want your competitor to know about the product you're developing,
> or the employee you're thinking of hiring? In fact, executives who
> fly private planes are now bitching about a public database that lets you
> type in the number of a plane and retrieve its current flight path.
>
> - Are you so sure that you're innocent? Here's what local police often
> do to trap men in alleged rape cases. The woman says it was rape; the man
> says it was consensual. The police are quite sympathetic to the man, and
> ask him to describe what actually happened, in great detail. Then they
> charge him with sodomy in addition to rape. Since he admitted to sodomy,
> which is often still illegal but few people know that, he hasn't a chance,
> even if the sex was consensual.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
------------------------------
From: **Nick Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 17:48:06 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been following this topic with perhaps more interest than it
deserves (in this forum, anyway).
One for you, JR:
Suppose your local government (wherever you live) is having a big push
against "online drug peddling" or "Internet child pornography" or
"cyber-terrorism". Most are, after all. And say someone, just for a
joke, goes to a public cybercafe, sets up a Hotmail account with _your_
name, and mails themselves a kiddie porn pic, or a "how to make bombs"
manual, and then calls the police. Just because they don't like you.
Hey, it could even be someone you've been exchanging views with in this
newsgroup :-). Oh, and they copy your local paper too.
Now, the police are going to have NO trouble at all getting a warrant to
go through EVERY single file on your PC. They will have "experts" who
will want you to show them EVERY single file. And while you do that...
they will sit there. And they might just be impassionate observers...
or they might behave like the average 95-IQ white male, and make kind of
crude remarks about every file on your system. Certainly about every
scanned pic of your wife on vacation. And even if nothing worse comes
of it - even if the local paper don't say "Police called at the home of
an XX year old local resident in XYZ street, who we can't name, although
his neighbours know damn well who he is because they saw the squad cars
outside" - you will feel pretty shitty about the whole experience.
--
===============================================================
Nick Brown, Strasbourg, France (Nick(dot)Brown(at)coe(dot)fr)
Protect yourself against Word 95/97 viruses, free - check out
http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/Vineyard/1446/atlas-t.html
===============================================================
------------------------------
From: Jean-Michel LEON-FOUN-LIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TEST AGAIN
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:15:56 +0400
OK NOW
------------------------------
From: "AMJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Looking for a webcam for linux
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 20:47:43 +0100
Hi there!
I'm looking for good webcam server-software
and hardware for Linux (SuSE 5.*/6.*).
keywords:
- stable software
- serverpush/clientpull/streaming/stills
(and upload of pictures through ftp to provider)
- availability (hard & software)
- parallel interface
- free (GNU,almost free) software
- cheap but good color camera
- compatability browsers & platforms (clients)
- easy to use/install
I want to use it for dialup connections, Intranet
and for livecontent on webpages.
Any suggestions?
Thx
Marius Kluin
I
------------------------------
From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:22:48 -0600
Harald Holzer wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
|What is the Real World (tm) ? (= MS World (c) !)
No, but in The Real World (tm), Micro$oft is damned popular. <Irony
intended> You can make a lot of money supporting Micro$oft, and making
Micro$oft work with other systems.
|Thats right there are many Sites on the Internet coded with ASP, but I
|thing its the right choice to get back on the open path, and change to
|an alternativ free and open standart.
Since when have business people ever made The Right Choice (tm)? If they
listened to us, we would have solved the y2k problem back in the 80s! :-)
The fact is, the CEO was shown Front Page by his brother's, wife's, kid, and
now he likes being able to work on the web page. <not that he ever does...>
People feel important if they can ask for something they think they know
about.
|The people the have used ASP have used an free MS tool that bounds the
|people to MS platforms.
Three words... You. Preaching. Choir. But we have Samba. When do we
get "Pain in the ASP" for Linux? :-)
|ASP pages consist of Basic code and the use of DCOM Elements where no
|free Implementation exists. Because many of this standarts developt
|from MS with many extenstion only for the MS Platforms.
|Change to an free source language gives us the ability to quicker
|develop the features the we all need to do your work.
OK. You tell everyone, while I wait here. :-) Micro$oft can out shout
you. The trick is, support it, and don't tell them. Do you think I let
everyone know the NT box they connect to for file sharing isn't NT?
Lee
--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an individual,
not as a representative of any company, organization or other entity. I am
solely responsible for my words.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: nfs and permissions
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 20:35:19 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Taro Fukunaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a linux machine that exports a directory to my other machine via
> nfs. However I am having a problem with permissions. Say machine_A is
> the server and machine_B is the client. Both have the same user name.
> When I mount the home directory of the user located on machine_A on
> machine_B and do ls -l, all the files and directories are marked 501.
> This is the UID and GID for machine_A for myself. On machine_B, my UID
> and GID is 500.
>
> Basically, I can't read/write as if my home directory on machine_A is
> truly my own. In order to do that, I have to change the permissions of
> every directory to 777, and similarily files have to be 555. Normally
> I'd prefer 700 and 500 for directories that I don't want to share with
> the whole world.
>
> How can I do this? I've read the NFS HOWTO, and the only conclusion I've
> come to is that yeah, that's NFS. Other than restricting access to IP
> numbers, there doesn't seem a whole lot I can do but...anybody have any
> suggestions?
>
> Thank you.
The manpage should give you an idea how to map UID on an NFS export.
--
Jim Roberts Never enough time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Lee Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: FUD ALERT! was Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:28:55 -0600
The Lone Scribe wrote in message <7cu8o3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
|Yadda yadda yadda. FUD, FUD, FUD. If it's a pissing contest you want, I'll
|bet I make more money doing UNIX programming than you do with your pissy
|little ASP. But that's not the real point here, is it? Look, I'm not
denying
|your right to play with those inferior M$ tools in your concept of 'the
real
|world'. It's a free country, and if you want to saddle yourself with an
|inferior, closed technology and ride that high horse off into the
Micro$haft
|sunset, that's your right. What I question is your deep-seated need to
|preach the Gospel of DeGates here in a Linux newsgroup. Why not go preach
to
|the choir over in the M$ newsgroups, or are you just itching for a fight?
Did you even read my post? If I just wanted to "blindly support
Micro$oft, I would install NT and IIS, and go home. Hell, I would even get
tones of money coming in a rebooting it from time to time. I don't want to
play with them, the CUSTOMERS DO!!!!!!!!!! Rather than have to preach to
everyone who whines "My front page doesn't work," I just want to make it
work.
I got all these people wanting to park cars at my building, and you
maniacally running about saying planes are better. I know, but they all
have cars!
|Or do you really, deep down inside, realize that Linux is superior after
|all?
No. Right frickin up front! That is why I am dealing with a person that
would flunk out of a High School debate class trying to find out how to make
it fit in this application! Do you have an answer other than "Simple.
Change the gravitational constant of the universe." Thought not.
Lee
--
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is
necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. *
Black holes are where God divided by zero. - I am speaking as an individual,
not as a representative of any company, organization or other entity. I am
solely responsible for my words.
------------------------------
From: "Chuck Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.games.gamesnetwork,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
Subject: ********************Set up your own network. 4 10 mb ethernet cards for just
$4 each!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*************************
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 21:26:52 GMT
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=80203368
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKee)
Subject: Re: "Network unreachable"..... help!!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 17:13:43 GMT
Hi Steph,
Here's what I do to get around that same problem. It seems that eth0 is the default
route, and
you're actually pinging your internal network. After starting X, I first issue the
command:
route del default
Then I open the Network Configurator from Control Panel, select interfaces, select
ppp0, and click
Active button. This initiates the dial-out and I'm connected properly. I don't know
why, but if I
reboot, the default route is restored, so I have to go through this routine each time.
It feels
like a kludge, but, hey, I'm still learning.
HTH,
On Fri, 19 Mar 99 13:14:46 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steph Hepburn) wrote:
>Hi, I've come to grief with my new installation of Slack 3.6 -- I'd appreciate
>it if anyone had any ideas.
>
>My ethernet network works absolutely fine, set that one up no probs.
>
>But in dialing up to my ISP nothing happens
>
>I used a shell script my ISP gave me to set up dial-up which worked ok -- it
>dialed up but then PAP kicked me off.
>
>I got PAP to work by changing my /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file from:
>
>username ppp0 password
>
>to
>
>username * password
>
>I guess that means the comp didn't have a ppp connection in mind... (pardon
>the non-technical lingo, you know what I mean).
>
>in /var/log/messages I got:
>
>connect ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
>Local IP address 12.34.56.78
>Remote IP address 23.45.67.89 -- or something like that anyway
>
>
>I can't ping anything at all outside my local network. I get a "network
>unreachable" error -- even if I try and ping the remote IP address (although
>the local IP address that appears in the log works ok)
>
>I checked /sbin/ifconfig, but there was no ppp0 entry as I guess there should
>be. Theres "lo" and "eth0" , but no PPP.
>
>
>I checked that PPP was all compiled into the kernel, and that chat and ppp
>were all installed -- they were.
>
>
>Well... I'm absolutely lost -- and I don't really want to continue using
>Windows for the internet --
>
>anyone have any ideas? thanks in advance --
>
>Steph
John McKee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Recommend Fast Ethernet Card
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:47:11 GMT
Jon Slater wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend a fast PCI Ethernet card for Linux?
>
Well, chances are that any recent Fast Ethernet card you buy nowadays will
work with Linux. I have a D-Link DFE-530TX card and it works fine.
--
Reply to "cwv [at] idirect (dot) com"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Lanning)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Ascertain actual connect speed, and auto indication of disconnect
Date: 19 Mar 1999 21:59:32 GMT
David Victor Lieberman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I am using ppp. How can I ascertain the actual connect speed,
: either during or after the connect process. I have done the following:
I tested the following on my modem, and it was fine, but I
assume no responsibility if it makes your modem smoke.
Compile with
# gcc getspeed.c -o getspeed
and use as root (or set-userid):
/* getspeed.c -- gets modem line speed. assumes /dev/modem points to
your modem. if not, 'ln -s /dev/ttyS1 /dev/modem' if /dev/ttyS1 is
where your modem is (ttyS1 is like COM2) --Scott Lanning */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <termios.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#define MODEM "/dev/modem"
int main() {
struct termios modem;
int fd;
int speed;
if ( (fd = open(MODEM, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)) < 0) {
printf("couldn't check modem\n");
exit(1);
}
tcgetattr(fd, &modem);
close(fd);
speed = get_bps( cfgetospeed(&modem));
switch(speed) {
case -1: printf("unknown speed\n");
case 0: printf("disconnected\n");
default: printf("line speed: %d\n", speed);
}
return 0;
}
int get_bps(speed_t speed)
{
switch(speed) {
/*there are other speeds in /usr/include/asm/termbits*/
#ifdef B115200
case B115200: return 115200;
#endif
#ifdef B57600
case B57600: return 57600;
#endif
case B38400: return 38400;
case B19200: return 19200;
case B9600 : return 9600;
case B4800 : return 4800;
case B0 : return 0;
default : return -1;
}
}
------------------------------
From: "Kevin D. Snodgrass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Subject: Re: Linux NCPFS slowness with CVS imports
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:20:38 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. Is this number of files a problem with NetWare 4.11?
No. You are a long way from having any problems related to
that.
> 2. Is renaming a large number of files on long name space a problem?
Shouldn't be. Have you applied the latest patch kit from
Novell? Sp6 or SP6a if I remember correctly.
> 3. Is NCPFS to blame for any of this?
Could be. Are there any patches for it?
> 4. <this question removed by the NSA>
I feel your pain....
> 5. We are thinking of upgrading to NetWare 5. Is NSS better for
> systems with very large numbers of files?
Might be, but I don't think this is your problem.
One suggestion, have you tried the NetWare Client for Linux
from Caldera Systems? Downloadable from
http://www.calderasystems.com/products/netware/index.html.
Caldera has a licensing agreement with Novell and their
client "should" be pretty good. ncpfs probably does things
roughly like a NETx client would, so I would assume the
Caldera product would be much better.
What was interesting to me was your description of the
packet trace. Something is not right when the server takes
four seconds to respond to a simple rename. Makes me wonder
if something is amiss in either server patches or config
parameters.
--
Kevin D. Snodgrass | Money in Washington (D.C.)
| is like honey to bears,
Spam-proofed email address, | they can't keep their paws
intelligent beings will adjust. | off of it. - Steve Forbes
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Dowell)
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 21:57:09 GMT
Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> The POINT here is that it is exactly as easy to embed my unique MAC address
>> in an Internet transaction as it is to embed my unique Pentium-III CPU ID
>> in an Internet transaction. Any software which will go to the trouble to
>> fetch the unique CPU identifier and send it over the network to identify me
>> could just as easily be written TODAY to use a MAC address for exactly the
>> same purpose. The CPU identifier is not significantly different in concept
>> from the MAC address, and yet there has not been a hue and cry to boycott
>> NIC manufacturers.
>
>Ho wmany home users ar LAN connected to the internet?
>oh, yeah, that's right, they dial up with a modem; no getting a MAC
>address from a machine that does not have one.
Why would you need a hardware ID to do any of the things that some of you
folks are objecting to? If I generated a random number large enough such
that the probability of duplication was below some reasonable threshold
and stored that number as the ID, what would be the real difference?
I've got lots of pseudorandom numbers pointing at me in precisely that way.
I don't think the end of the world is nigh because of it, though. Where's
the hue and cry about social security numbers, BTW? Or is that just a
paranoid redneck issue, while CPU IDs are an enlightened thinking man's
issue? Is it because the good government controls what is done with
social security numbers, but evil corporations are using CPU IDs?
Really. What's the big deal? Other than giant conspiracies by
multinational corporations to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily
fluids, of course.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Netatalk - could I create a new zone?
Date: 19 Mar 1999 23:00:12 +0100
Hello people.
I've Linux server with Samba + NWE (Mars). I need to add here Appletalk
as well. Heterogeneous network, you know. :)
I've SuSE 6.0 + netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2
Well the question.
Could I create a new zone. There is already zone on the cable but
it belongs to different dept. As far as I read from MacOS help there could
be many zones on one physical net. So how could I create one with netatalk.
It is no problem in principle to use same zone as another dept. but would be
better to have our own.
Second, when I login to my server from macs I get Password: .... (clear
text). How could I change to Kerberos as I read in man that netatalk
supports Kerberos? This is more important for me.
--
Andrey Nikolaev Ulm university,
Department of Biophysics. Germany.
Email: Andrey.Nikolaev@!get-lost-spammer!.uni-ulm.de
Substitute physik instead of !*! .
------------------------------
From: Edward Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall And DNS
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 08:44:18 -0800
>From my limited knowledge in this area, here are my inputs:
If you are running the nameserver for your local net, block input
for domain (port 53).
If you are running the nameserver for the outside, only allow
outside domain to your domain port.
Disable forwarding from the outside in either case.
Filargiropoulos Stavros wrote:
> Lets suppose we have a firewall on a machine running a nameserver.
> We should noramly ALLOW all incoming connection from port 53
> allow udp from 0.0.0.0/0 53 to localip
> allow tcp from 0.0.0.0/0 53 to locallip
> Right?
>
> Well isn't that a security whole, since someone can connect to any port
> on our machine
> if he uses the 53 port of his machine?
------------------------------
From: Michael McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Problem with windows telnet
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:11:33 +0000
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Hayden wrote:
> I'm having telnetting to my linux box with MS telnet (from 95). It's
> kinda bizzare in that it connects to the linux box but doesn't show any
> output in the telnet window. Typing in the window doesn't show up until
> after the connection times out. So nothing shows until after the telnet
> connection has been closed by the linux box.
>
> I'm using statically assigned IPs (but there is a dns running but it
> doesn't wark as yet, need to read the howto) and I can ping both
> machines from each other.
It sounds like a DNS thing. Try adding an entry for your Win95 box into your
/etc/hosts file.
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
Eridani Star System -- The Most Up-to-Date Red Hat Linux CDROMs Available
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.amush.cx/linux/ Fax: +44-8701-600807
------------------------------
From: Tom Neilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISP<->Wingate(WIN NT)<->Linux
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:14:48 GMT
Jorge Nagasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Anyone have successfully make wingate work with Linux?
: I m trying to access a internet ISP from LINUX machine connected
: to a Windows NT machine (with Wingate) and this windows NT
: connected to ISP via dial up , and it fails.
: from windows NT everything is fine. Looks like I could not
: get the wingate proxy server working.
: Also wingate support gives me configuration information for Windows NT
: in both machines, looks like they don't klnow about linux.
: I appreciate any suggestion.
Well now. Linux through the eye of a needle eh? Trying to connect to IBM
Global Services account - or you're apart of it - ISM ?
Hum ...
To start with, Wingate is a Proxy server period. Did you set your policies
on the Wingate server correctly? Are you using socksified apps like Netscape
on your Linux box?
Can you elaborate?
--
"Due to financial constraints,
the light at the end of the tunnel
has been turned off until further notice !!"
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: ADSL
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 16:36:09 -0600
In article <8fwI2.28$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stephen Osborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone got ADSL to work with Linux and recovered enought to to talk
> about?
I didn't have any real problems with Linux and the DSL that US West
sells. You can follow my home page to find a description of what I
did.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
