Linux-Networking Digest #803, Volume #10 Fri, 9 Apr 99 20:14:10 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux->windowsNT network using DHCP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Both stations can ping, but that's it (Patrick McCall)
Re: Why the long pause at "sendmail" at boot-up??? (Bob Sutherland)
Re: @home (Michael Tin)
Re: Comapq Built in NIC - TLAN?? ("Carl R. Friend")
Re: Pcmcia 3Com Megahertz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IRQ conflicts ("Mojoman")
Re: firewalls (ie: fwtk) vs. Ip Masquerading... ("Curt")
Re: Samba Again! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Multicast Permissions ("Brandon Kane")
nwclient environment variables ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Install Ethernet Card (xavier cable)
Newbie's networking woes (RTL-8029) (Gustaf Tham)
Ethernet Linux<-->Windows (Thomas Lauckner)
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (Jon-o Addleman)
Re: @home (Mike Kirk)
Re: Samba 2.0.3 and NT4? ("Jaime del Palacio")
sendto: Network is unreachable...please help! ("MalayJ")
DHCP and MediaOne Express ("Walter Longfield")
Re: SAMBA HOWTO ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
@home ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How to send HTML Mail (Job Eisses)
Re: How to send HTML Mail ("John Hardin")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux->windowsNT network using DHCP
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:57:58 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Nissim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Linux box attached to a windows NT network (domain not
> workgroup) running TCPIP. Using DHCP my Linux box get a valid
> connection IP address but cannot see any other machine BY NAME, nor can
> they see the linux machine. I can however ping them by IP address and
> they can ping me by IP address. I addition I can see the DNS servers
> and ping the internet by name.
> All windows based machines can ping each other by name.
> I believe the windows machines are using DHCP and WINS for name
> resolution.
>
> How come there is no name resolution on the local network ?
> Is WINS the problem ? Is there a WINS deamon for LINUX ?
>
> Daniel Nissim
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
The linux box must be able to see a name (DNS) server. The DHCP client
normally gets that information from the DHCP server. However, many DNS
servers are not setup to resolve machine names on a dynamically assigned IP
network. This is the case of the local WinNT server here at work. I believe
only the latest WinNT patches allow the DNS server to resolve DHCP clients. I
am not aware of a similar dynamic DNS under Linux yet. Windows goes around
this by using NetBEUI so the names that you use on a local network are
usually not resolved via DNS, and are not routed (it will not work if you try
to connect to your shares via the Internet, it will only work from the local
net).
The "fix" is to create entries in your C:\WINDOWS\HOSTS file under Windows,
or in your /etc/hosts file under Linux. Unfortunately, this will not work
very long for those machines that have dynamic IPs.
Didier
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick McCall)
Subject: Re: Both stations can ping, but that's it
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:09:48 GMT
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 15:14:10 GMT, "Ian Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Netmask and subnet are the same, right?
Everything I try to do outside the LAN just hangs. When I try to ping
outside the LAN, like for instance, www.msn.com and mail.tds.net, for
some reason, it can find the correct IP address (it is displayed once
I send the PING command), but nothing ever comes back.
My NT Workstation, which hosts the connection, is:
IP: 192.168.0.1
Subnet: 255.255.2550
My Network Configuration window in X reads like this:
IP: 192.168.0.2
Netmask: 255.255.255.0
Names:
Hostname: localhost.localdomain
Domain: (left blank)
Nameservers: 192.168.0.1
204.246.1.20
204.70.128.1 (These last two are the DNS of my ISP)
Hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
Interfactes:
lo 127.0.0.1
eth0 192.168.0.2
Routing:
Default Gateway: (left blank)
Default Gateway Device: eth0
netmask 192.168.0.1
I hope you can make some sense out of this.
Thanks
Patrick
------------------------------
From: Bob Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why the long pause at "sendmail" at boot-up???
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 16:02:58 -0500
Jim's excellent advise just worked the exact problem for me. You'll
need
three columns in your /etc/hosts file for the local machine. The first
two lines in my look like:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
137.188.33.245 aptiva aptiva.mydomain.com
(Bet you can't tell what kind of machine it is...). When I added the
aptiva.mydomain.com it worked the problem
Bob S
Jim Roberts wrote:
>
> > Before networking my machine. The boot-up was pretty fast. But now,
> > there is this long (30-45 sec) pause on "sendmail" during boot up.
> >
> > Why???
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jon
>
> Actually Jon, sendmail is trying to resolve the FQD of the server (box)
> it is running on. If you put your FQD in the /etc/hosts file, all will
> work as before.
>
> BTW, FQD Fully Qualified Domain name "you.your.domain"
> --
> Jim Roberts Never enough time!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Michael Tin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @home
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:41:28 GMT
It is possible, I got it running on my linux box, but my alpha linux box right
now is choking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The local cable company will soon offer @home cable modem connections.
>
> I have not been able to get information beyond the fact that they seem to
> discourage home networks.
>
> Has anyone successfully connected a linux box through an @home cable modem?
>
> Didier
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Comapq Built in NIC - TLAN??
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 17:09:06 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone had success with getting a compaq built in
> NIC working -- it is on a proliant 1600R. I heard there is a TLAN
> driver, but have not found much on it.
TLAN drivers exist for kernels as far back as at least 2.0.35 and
I have four Compaq Proliant 2500s at work with the TLAN drivers
installed and running. For 2.0 kernels you need to specify that you
want "experimental code" when you're configuring (the drivers are
"normal" in the 2.2 series).
I would steer clear of Compaq hardware, however. From personal
experience, I've found that there's _just_enough_ proprietary crud
in them to goof up Linux. For instance, I have yet to get any of the
2.2.x kernels running on the 2500s (the kernel boots OK, then hangs
after 10 or 15 seconds of uptime).
--
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~crfriend/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pcmcia 3Com Megahertz
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:42:06 GMT
In article <7eftbf$4b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"NGO Kaluong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use a Linux Kernel 2.0.36. The system dectect my pcmcia card but i cannot
> use the network function with !
> Can someone help me !!!!!!
>
>
you have several parameters to set in /etc/pcmcia/network.opts and also make
sure you have /etc/rc.d/rc.pcmcia and that rc.pcmcia is properly invoked by
rc.inet2.
All this is normally properly documented in the docs that come with the pcmcia
package.
Otherwise, check the PCMCIA-HOWTO
Didier
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Mojoman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,apana.lists.os.linux.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: IRQ conflicts
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 15:12:16 -0600
I have been informed that a slow running minicom can be caused by IRQ
conflicts with my modem. I have a feeling this is the case. However, I have
no idea how to find the IRQ settings within linux to determine what
conflicts I may have. Anyhelp would be appreciated, and if anyone has
suggestions on how to fix these conflicts I would really be happy.
Mark Powell
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: firewalls (ie: fwtk) vs. Ip Masquerading...
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 17:22:56 -0500
Take a look at http://www.socks.nec.com/introduction.html
See 'Why Socks'
Eric wrote in message ...
>Curt wrote in message <9laP2.517$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>>Socks operates at the transport layer (TCP). Forwarding must be off to
>>accomplish a firewall.
>>IMO this can give a more secure setup. However, all clients must be
>>'sockified', with sockscaps or some other wrapper. Many clients support
>>socks already, netscape, IE, MIRC...
>
>>
>>I use socks for the network connection that is up 24/7 and IP masq when
the
>>connection is on demand.
>>
>
>
>
>2 questions come to mind - what makes you feel that the proxy server is
more
>secure? The fact that packets can not be "faked"? That they actually must
>be valid packets at the application level? I guess this helps cut off a
lot
>of spoofing and packet level attacks, but is it realistically that much
more
>secure?
The feeling probably comes from more control rather than anything else.
For example, SOCKS5 allows for futher authentication of the client. This
allows for putting
some control on abuse of users on the inside. One assumption of a firewall
is that you trust all those on the inside. This is not alway true.
>
>How do you handle UDP & ICMP packets with a proxy server? From what I
>understand, the new SOCKS server (Nec V. 5) can be configured to handle
UDP,
>but what about ICMP?
>
UDP is handled ok on some applications. Some not at all. Cuseeme is one
that is poorly designed and will probably never work through a proxy server.
ICMP usually not at all. Although I've, heard of some versions of ping that
will use a proxy
server. I'm not aware of a similar traceroute, but something similar
coulde be done there too.
>
>Secondly, which is easier to configure when it comes to Dynamic IP
>addresses - either due to dial on demand, or more importantly, when a
>company renews your IP address (ie: in the case of cable modem and/or
>ADSL)....
I know how via IP Masq, but I'm unsure on socks.
Try searchnig the socks newsgroup on NEC's site.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Eric
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Again!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 19:45:13 GMT
Make sure in [global] settings you have "hosts allow" either commented out, or
you have valid IPs.
Also, you will have to use encrypted passwords if connecting from NT.
See docs/ENCRYPTION.txt in samba source dir, or search with the following
command...
find / -iname ENCRYPTION.txt
It contains step by step instructions on how to enable encrypted passwords.
Ed
In article <7ebkm3$pko$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have recently installed Linux Mandrake 5.3(RH 5.2 & KDE)on a spare box
> at the office. When I try to access it from a Windows machine I get "not
> allowed to log on from this location" I can see the box from Network
> Neighborhood. Ping works well both ways, netscape works fine. I am a
> Newbie at Linux. I hope to make this work so I can break the Microsoft
> Chain of thought at my place of employment.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Mark West
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Brandon Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multicast Permissions
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 17:38:53 -0400
I'm trying to run a java app on RedHat 5.2 that listens for multicast data.
The app only runs when launched as root, and gives a 'permission denied'
error otherwise. Is there a way to grant multicast socket creation for
users?
thanks
-Brandon
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nwclient environment variables
Date: 9 Apr 1999 21:00:40 GMT
Where do you set the environment variables for the linux netware client
and what is the syntax. I have added lines such as
NWCLIENT_DEFAULT_USER=joines and
NWCLIENT_DEFAULT_USER='CN=joines.OU=email.O=toa' to the file
/etc/sysconfig/daemons/nwclient but nwlogin tries to log me in as root in
the first context it finds. I am running Caldera OpenLinux 1.3.
------------------------------
From: xavier cable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Install Ethernet Card
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:08:16 +0200
> Anyone out there Install a second Ethernet Card on an existing Redhat
> installation?
>
> Joshua T. Pyle
It's not very difficult, if your card is correctly set and the kernel
support it, you just have to tell lilo that he must search a second
ethernet card and not stop after finding the first.
so just add this into your /etc/lilo.conf file :
...
image=[your kernel]
...
append="ether=0,0,eth1"
....
this means that lilo must detect (0=autodetect) an eth1 interface.
that's all
:)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gustaf Tham)
Subject: Newbie's networking woes (RTL-8029)
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 09:53:22 GMT
Hello,
My Linux boxes refuse to talk to each other.
I have two PC's, each running SuSE Linux 6.0, and each fitted with
a Realtek RTL-8029 PCI networking card.
I connected these with coax, no hub.
At boot, each card is reported as;
ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE 2000 clone RealTek RTL-8029 at I/O =x7400 IRQ 15 ..
and
eth0: PCI NE 2000 etc.
netstat -i reports a dummy and an eth0 interface.
As ethernet address I use 10.0.0.1 and 2 respectively.
Mask is 255.255.255.0, and broadcast is 10.0.0.255
When I ping the other computer, there is 100% packet loss.
When I ping the computer I'm working at, network is reported as
unreachable.
What gives?
How do I for instance know, that the autosensing is working, such that
the BNC (cheapernet) connection is used?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Gustaf Tham
------------------------------
From: Thomas Lauckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ethernet Linux<-->Windows
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 08:00:02 +0200
I bought RedHat a few months ago.
After a while, I tried to have a network between my Linux and my Windows
computer. I have samba and I think samba's HOWTO will help. But I'm not
even able to ping my Windows computer. Both computers have
192.168.110.X. X means 1 or 2.
You have to know, I've Windows installed on my first partition. If I
tell my other computer to have the IP 192.168.110.2, I'm not even able
to have a network between Windows and Windows! but if I set the IP's to
"autoconfigure" in Windows, the network works fine... But that's not the
problem.
How can I connect my Linux and Windows PC?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon-o Addleman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:22:59 GMT
Once upon a Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:58:27 +0200, "Jan Johansson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Uhm, no. The MS Net client sits ontop of the networking components, the
>mouse does NOT sit above the sound components.
>
>>That's my point, though I didn't phrase it properly... What does that
>>network program have to do with dialup passwords? Nothing!
>>
>>An analogy for this situation would be that you have to install a
>>mouse driver in order to use your sound card! The two have nothing in
>>common...
Hmm.. Ok. Then it's like having to install a sound editing program in
order to get sound in your games.. In any case, you do NOT need ms
networking in order to save a password for dialup!
--
Jon-o Addleman
------------------------------
From: Mike Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @home
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 18:04:14 -0400
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not been able to get information beyond the fact that they seem to
> discourage home networks.
>
> Has anyone successfully connected a linux box through an @home cable modem?
I have a RH5.2 machine running with Rogers @Home service. It also is
running Apache, ftp, samba and telnet daemons. And it IP masquerades for 3
Win95/98/NT machines on an internal network for my roommates computers.
And I set up Pine (so I can do my @home email via telnet) last weekend.
I don't think you're supposed to be running this stuff, but there aren't
any technical reasons why you can't.
BTW - I'm only a 'newbie' Linux user, but I managed to get this stuff
running, so if you are having problems I can help (maybe :) )
Later,
Mike
P.S. Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jaime del Palacio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.3 and NT4?
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 13:31:13 -0700
Andrew Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ejem9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm trying to phase out an NT fileserver/PDC in an organisation of
> <100 users with a couple of routed subnets. All users have Unix and
> NT accounts and most are using NT workstation clients. I'm currently
> using Intel/SPARC Linux 2.2.5 and Samba 2.0.3.
>
> How do I set up Samba on the subnets to get NT login authentication
> via the PDC on the main net (ie. NT4 WS reports no PDC)? I have
> slave NIS servers on some subnets and would much prefer if the NT/W95
> users could authenticate locally via the NIS database.
You can use the "password server" option in the smb.conf file to point to
your
PDC, that way all auth. are done with the PDC, they have to have accounts on
the
Linux box though. I think there's some tricky part in this that you have to
specify
the NetBios name of the PDC and add it to the hosts file. When I set this
up, it
didn't work when I tried the DNS name of the PDC.
>
> Is the NT PDC always the WINS server? How do I distribute browse
> lists to/from clients on the subnets using Samba.
>
I think you can set up the samba server to be the local wins server for the
subnet and
then synch. with the PDC.
hope this helps
jaime
------------------------------
From: "MalayJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sendto: Network is unreachable...please help!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:30:15 -0700
Hello:
I am running pristine redhat 5.2 out of the box.
- Using minicom to login to my PPP account over a modem line (there are no
networking cards configured in my system)
- Using pppd -d -detach /dev/ttyS0 38400 & to startup the daemon
Ping to the IP address of the gateway (same as DNS server) works fine. All
other pings fail as below. DNS seems to be working as I can type in names
and they get resolved as shown below:
PING
========
PING redhat.com (207.175.42.154): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote redhat.com 64 chars, ret = -1
IFCONFIG
==============
Link encap: Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr: 205.149.171.120 P-t-P: 204.156.128.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU = 1500 Metric: 1
........
........
Kernel IP routing table
==============================
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
204.156.128.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 2 ppp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
Traceroute
===============
traceroute to redhat.com (207.175.42.154) 30 hops max, 40 byte pkts
traceroute: sendto: Network is unreachable
1 traceroute: wrote redhat.com 40 chars, ret = -1
Notes:
- the net mask reported by IFCONFIG and routing table are different - could
this be the problem, how can I fix it.
- I had not configured networking while installing linux, would this cause a
problem.
Thanks in Advance
malayj
------------------------------
From: "Walter Longfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP and MediaOne Express
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:31:45 -0500
Hello,
I just recently got my Linux box up, and I bought a cable modem. I am using
Debian 2.1, kernel 2.2.5, dhcpcd-1.3.17-pl2, 3c509b which is detected and
works. I read the DHCP Howto but it does nothing for Troubleshooting. Here
is my problem.
Dhcpcd gets the IP and assigns it etc no errors, although if I ping any site
OTHER then my assigned IP I get network unreachable errors. So I checked
the routing. I first saw a route with the destination 24.29.240.0 and the
gateway as *. This seemed weird so I tried to remove it, although the
command route Del -net 24.29.240.0 fails. Why is this happening? Any help
would be helpful.
Reply back by Email or to the Newsgroup. Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SAMBA HOWTO
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:28:58 GMT
In article <7ef4k9$6hf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Goh T.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to setup SAMBA for a long time, but to no avil. I have read
> the samba howtos, but they are quite complicated. Does anyone have any good
> documentation for newbies like me?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Daniel
>
look up http://homepages.infoseek.com/~ko4bb/samba-setup.html
Good luck
Didier
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: @home
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:31:12 GMT
The local cable company will soon offer @home cable modem connections.
I have not been able to get information beyond the fact that they seem to
discourage home networks.
Has anyone successfully connected a linux box through an @home cable modem?
Didier
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Job Eisses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to send HTML Mail
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:53:48 +0200
James Roman wrote:
>
> What is required to send a HTML message type e-mail message?
>
> I am interested in investigating use of HTML formatted mail messages for
> a project that I am working on. The project is being developed on a
> linux server, but will most likely be implemented on a Sun or HP
> system. I would like to be able to mail HTML forms. The clients are
> using Outlook clients, which can read HTML formatted messages. Any
> explanations about what type of mail servers need to be used, etc.,
> would be greatly appreciated.
The mail server is not important here, the Mail User Agent is however.
If i want to send preformatted mail messages from programs, i write
one with Netscape, send it to myself, save it as a file, and than use
this as the basis for a script that produces "To: " headers and other
variable lines. -job
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to send HTML Mail
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:36:29 -0700
James Roman wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>What is required to send a HTML message type e-mail message?
>
>I am interested in investigating use of HTML formatted mail messages for
>a project that I am working on. The project is being developed on a
>linux server, but will most likely be implemented on a Sun or HP
>system. I would like to be able to mail HTML forms. The clients are
>using Outlook clients, which can read HTML formatted messages. Any
>explanations about what type of mail servers need to be used, etc.,
>would be greatly appreciated.
$ mail recipient@domain < whatever.html
If you wish to have both plain-text and HTML then you're looking at a
multi-part MIME message. Run "apropos mime" and read the man pages it
suggests.
The server doesn't care. To the mail server the body of the message is just
a stream of characters.
HTH
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
