Linux-Networking Digest #803, Volume #9 Thu, 7 Jan 99 05:13:35 EST
Contents:
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: No FTP Under ipfwadm (Additional Info) (Chris Hanrahan)
Re: Sharing my UMAX Astra 610s scanner w/ UMAX Scan Manager v1.2, using SANE
(Redhat 5.2 Linux) ("USB Port")
Can not see the Mars server under DOSEMU of another Linux machine? (Alex Yung)
HELP: Routing all except one IP from a C-net (Jan Stifter)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ("anarkissed")
Re: Redhat 5.2, SAMBA and Win98, Question resolved. Now is there a (Athan)
Re: How to serve two domains ? ("Thomas Bendler")
Re: PPP in RH 5.2 ("�ystein Haare")
Re: linux -> windows -> internet (Eugene)
Re: After IP Masquerade done ?? (Durango)
/usr over nfs? ("Markus Hauke")
Re: modemdriver under linux? ("Alexandre Cassen")
Re: ppp problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: /usr over nfs? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
H323 and VOIP ("Alexandre Cassen")
does anybody know how to connect to an NT4 share using smbclient? (Mark Krischer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but
am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 18:00:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 04 Jan 1999 11:51:13 GMT, "Crossbones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off... Great job on pissing a lot of people in this newsgroup off.
>Way to go. Piss enough of them off and they might actually notice that they
>can bitch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. And probably will.
>
> Anyways, Since you're so damned impatient to install RH linux, you need to
>do the following things: (And you WILL need to work at this a bit.. I'm not
>going to source out all the damned directory trees for you and tell you
>EXACTLY where everything is)
>
I can't believe my eyes. You actually give him useful information ? Didn't you
read all the shit he was posting ? Do you think this should be tolerated in any
way ???
=====================================================
Answers please in this newsgroup!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hanrahan)
Subject: Re: No FTP Under ipfwadm (Additional Info)
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 06:21:32 GMT
Additional information regarding this problem: I can surf the web
just fine, send and receive email and (obviously) usenet.
------------------------------
From: "USB Port" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sharing my UMAX Astra 610s scanner w/ UMAX Scan Manager v1.2, using SANE
(Redhat 5.2 Linux)
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.periphs.scanner,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.graphics.apps.gimp,linux.samba
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 07:02:26 GMT
Doesn't anyone know the answer to this?
SCSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<01be3366$1f4244b0$0200a8c0@mycompnt>...
> How do I get SANE on my Linux workstation to be configured to use my UMAX
> Astra 610s over the network when it is being served by the UMAX Scan
> Manager v1.2 (part of VistaScan v3.1)?
>
> THIS TOPIC HAS STUMPED ME FOR SEVERAL MONTHS NOW, AND THE SANE
> DOCUMENTATION SAYS NOTHING ABOUT THIS.
>
> How can it be done?
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Yung)
Subject: Can not see the Mars server under DOSEMU of another Linux machine?
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 18:30:08 GMT
I just have Mars up and running. The DOS client has no problem seeing
it as a Novell server but the DOSEMU of another Linux machine can not
see the Mars server at all. Both machines use the same kernel. I did
not find anything from the FAQ. Does anyone know whether there is an
English website for Mars?
When I tried to load "NETX", it responded with "No server found".
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:58:58 +0100
From: Jan Stifter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP: Routing all except one IP from a C-net
I have the following situation:
| eth1 / |--------------| eth0 / |--------|
| a.b.c.1 | linux 2.0.35 | a.b.c.224 | router |
|---------| firewall |------------| |--internet/ISP
| | masquerading | |--------|
| | -------------|
ethernet
a.b.c.*
(without a.b.c.224)
|
|
|
* infos:
from my ISP, I got 16 IP's, a.b.c.224 - a.b.c.239. I need to use
the whole C-net
a.b.c.*, but to masquerade all other than a.b.c.224 - .239 (e.g.
a.b.c.50 goes into
the internet with a.b.c.224, with a different port...)
* problem:
I have to route all a.b.c.* except one IP (a.b.c.224) to eth1,
a.b.c.224 to eth0, and
the default as well to eth0.
- how do I configure with ifconfig eth0 and eth1 ?
- how do I set up the routing (with route) ?
I am trying for 3 days now, and it is not working....
thank you very much for help / and / or advise
jan stifter
=====================================================================
| Jan Stifter email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| web: www.htl-bw.ch/~ia95stif |
| meet me: telnet://freechess.org:5000 (nick: nunc) |
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: "anarkissed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:22:01 GMT
Dude, if you had read anything about linux you'd have noticed that unlike
windoze for idiots, it requires intelligence to install. The kind of
intelligence that realizes that you don't abuse ppl who give you tech
support for FREE on software you got for FREE just because they don't have
the perfect answer for you. so, like, if you really wanna solve your
problem, put the computer back in the box it came from, send it back return
to sender and give the reason as "too stupid to operate a computer" then,
get out your etch-a-sketch and swear to your heart's content. Or, better
yet, sign up for that new web tv, you don't have to know ANYTHING to use it!
DG wrote in message <3692dcca.14993607@news>...
>ANOTHER MENTALLY RETARDED PIGFART !!!
>
>On Sat, 02 Jan 1999 20:20:28 GMT, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>You asked for help, and we tried to give you help. If you want to think
that we are
>>"stupid idiots" then that's your problem, but just remember who asked who
for help and
>>who cannot get it working in the first place.
>>please try to remember that we are NOT experts (well mabye some of us..I'm
not) we are
>>all learning,,if somoene gives you an answer thatis not correct then move
on to the
>>next answer or rephrase the question!
>>Good luck!
>>
>>*******************ARROWOFTHEMORNINGSTAR********************
>>
>>DG wrote:
>>
>>> Fine, I'll take it there then. I ask a question and end up with most
>>> people giving mentally retarded answers in return but that's o.k. The
>>> world's full of stupid idiots.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 03 Jan 1999 03:25:00 +0900, Mike Thoreson
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi. i do apologize if my message sounds a bit too long but at least
>>> >> you all will be able to figure out the sticky problem I'm stuck with
>>> >> and may even know how to help me out of it. I currently am running
>>> >> Windows 98 on one hard disk. However, since it is 7.5 GB and it's
>>> >> 32-bit, Linux won't recognize it when I first install Linux...
<snip>
>>> >
>>> >> P.S:
>>> >> PLEASE DO NO TELL ME TO USE ANOTHER VERSION OF UNIX SINCE I KINDA AM
>>> >> USED TO RH LINUX. ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME HOW TO PARTITION MY
HARD
>>> >> DRIVE SINCE MY 75. GB HARD DRIVE IS NEARLY FILLED UP... <snip>
>>> >>
>>> >> Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
>>> >> past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
>>> >>
>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======
>>> >
>>> >This may not be the complete solution, but it is something to consider.
The first
>>> >issue is your vfat32 partition. That is a kernel issue and not RedHat
specific. I
>>> >have read that kernel 2.0.36 is able to access a vfat32 partition. I
can't verify
>>> >that, but I am using a development kernel 2.1.132 which has no problem
with my
>>> >Win98 vfat32 partition. Your problem as I see it, is that the basic
kernel image
>>> >you have downloaded isn't set up to handle a vfat32 partition. I know
with your
>>> >wining personality you could find someone who can build you a custom
kernel image
>>> >with the necessary modules built in so that it can access your vfat32
partition.
>>> >Then use windows to download everything you need, to your 7 GB drive.
Oh and you
>>> >need loadlin. There's HOWTOs available via HTML on how to use loadlin.
Reboot to a
>>> >dos prompt and boot linux from your vfat32 partition using loadlin and
the
>>> >customized kernel image. This would get around your ethernet card
problem, until
>>> >you have a full Linux system running.
>>> >
>>> >Also I would think you need more then just 2 floppy disks. You would
need the
>>> >entire base system on floppys. That way you would have all the basic
drivers
>>> >available, such as the ethernet drivers, vfat driver and a basic ftp
application.
>>> >I might be wrong, but on kernel versions before 2.0.36 the vfat driver
allowed you
>>> >to access a win95 partition with its long file names. Starting with
kernel 2.0.36
>>> >it is able to access a vfat32 partition. I'm sure that would require
more then 2
>>> >floppy disks. For example, with Debian, it requires a total of 6 floppy
disks. But
>>> >what do I know
>>> >
>>> >For what it's worth - Good Luck
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Mike Thoreson
>>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>
------------------------------
From: Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.2, SAMBA and Win98, Question resolved. Now is there a
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:23:36 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inside the Win98 cd there is a note about that, search for *.txt and read
it...
Athan
The Maxxz wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 1998 22:11:28 -0500, "Jay Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I fugured out why win98 wont log into a linux machine properly. the
> >passwards from 98 are encripted.
> >
> >Is there a fix..................
> >
>
> You could try reading the ENCRYPTION.txt that comes with samba, but
> i'll save you the problem and tell you from memory what's needed to
> get samba to run. For the details you should read the above text.
>
> First you got to make a smbpasswd file from the password file from
> your linux box. There's a script which does that, and it's included
> with samba.
>
> You can then change the samba passwords for each user by using the
> smbpasswd command. You have to do this since the first time you make
> the smbpasswd file there are no passwords in it. The first script
> only generates a list of users accounts.
>
> In the smb.conf file you should add a line so samba knows you're using
> encrypted passwords.
> it's something like
>
> encrypted passwords = yes (see the manual for correct syntax)
>
> You also have to set up some shares. You can do that by removing the
> # from within the example conf.
>
> Restart samba.
>
> Finally log into your windows system using the same password and
> username as which resides in the smbpasswd file.
>
> You should now be able to browse your linux.
>
> --
> TM
>
> http://www.ping.be/themaxxz/
>
> remove no_ _spam before replying by mail
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Bendler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to serve two domains ?
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:02:34 +0100
Hi Bj�rn,
I think it's possible working with virtual domains. The Question is which
kind of services you want provide about the two domains, for example the
apache server includes virtual domains.
regards Thomas
Bj�rn Hellmann schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Hi all,
would it be possible serve two domains by one NS ?
E.g. mydomain.com + mydomain.net
which shall result in e.g.
host.mydomain.com = host.mydomain.net = 1.2.3.4
How to configure DNS that way ?
Thanks for any help !
Bj�rn Hellmann
------------------------------
From: "�ystein Haare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: PPP in RH 5.2
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:59:06 +0100
if it connects but you can't ping anything, it's probably just a problem with
routing, try doing: route add default ppp0
A.G. wrote:
> Is it only me, or is PPP setup in RedHat all screwed up?
>
> I tried using their graphical tool to configure PPP from "Control Panel",
> then I tried linuxconfig to do the same. Alright, I got my modem to dial,
> but I couldn't connect to any site. Couldn't even ping my ISP.
>
> Then I found out that I should have been using a different netmask for the
> IP address that my ISP assigns me, but there doesn't seem to be any way to
> define it using any interactive tools. So, all options exhausted I turned to
> Howto's and FAQs. =/
>
> They all talk about scripts that are non-existent in Redhat Linux file
> system. Once I located needed scripts in docs to PPP, and copied them to
> correct locations, and edited them, and changed file permissions around, I
> finally got connected (following Howto's instructions).
>
> However, the setup for ppp0 didn't change a bit in the linuxconfig or
> "control panel". So I can't "activate" interface from there. Have to type
> ppp-on. Not a big problem, but I would really like to know WHERE does RedHat
> Linux keep ITS configuratoin of ppp0??? Couldn't find it anywhere. :[
>
> Any ideas? File names?
>
> I am only a week into Linux, so I beg for your tolerance for my ignorance.
>
> A.G.
------------------------------
From: Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux -> windows -> internet
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 19:13:13 GMT
www.linux.org/help
Todd Smith wrote:
> i have an ethernet network set up between my linux box and windows95. I
> know i should make my linux box connect to the net instead of windows,
> but right now it's linux -> windows -> net. so my two computers can ping
> each other, windows can telnet to linux, linux can get to windows (with
> a rejection, but at least it can get there). I suppose i need a proxy
> server on win95, so any suggestions on how to do that? if you insist on
> making me get linux to dial the net, i would need help on setting up
> either a Diamond Multimedia SupraExpress 336i PnP Voice modem or a
> NewCom 56ifxvC Internal Voice modem. either way, i'd like help. thanks.
>
> --
> _______________
> Todd Smith
> Perl Programmer
> ITC^Deltacom
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Durango)
Subject: Re: After IP Masquerade done ??
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 21:17:58 GMT
It works perfectly, after following your instructions exactly.
Thanks.
>I collected and edited some posts to this group on the combined subjects of
>pppd dial-on-demand and IP masquerade and saved them at this address:
>
><http://www.nic.com/~cannon/Linux/>
------------------------------
From: "Markus Hauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr over nfs?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:50:24 +0100
Hello,
I�d like to install Linux on a Network of about 10 PC�s. One of them
should be a nfs server with lots of disk space. My question is:
Is it possible to install my Linux distribution with all the needed
programs on the server and then do a "mount -t nfs server:/usr /usr" on
all clients???
On the clients should only run a minimal Linux system, so that they can
boot on their own and then do mount the /usr tree from the server.
Thanks for help!
Markus
------------------------------
From: "Alexandre Cassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modemdriver under linux?
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:53:48 +0100
Hi,
You do not need drivers, just have a look at your serial line speed ... use
setserial command to speed it to 115Kb
bye
--
Alexandre Cassen - INSA de Lyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I've a 3Com U.S Robotics 56K. I use it under Linux. It works as a low speed
>modem with 9800 Bps. Where can I find the correct driver for linux? Can you
>help me?
>Thanks Hans
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ppp problem
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:48:30 GMT
[posted and mailed] I'm assuming you have a real null modem cable (data pins
and flow control pins crossed over) and not just a 'serial cable' which will
not work.
If so, run ppp on one machine with
pppd local -detach noauth passive crtscts /dev/modem 38400 [ipA:ipB]
and then go over to the other with
pppd local -detach noauth local -detach crtscts /dev/modem 38400 [ipB:ipA]
and check the logfiles, usually
/var/log/messages
/var/log/syslog
or /var/adm/*
and see what other problems you may have. Close reading of the man pages
and the stuff in /usr/doc/ppp* will help you with more complicated options.
"Morten Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're trying to link two computers with a serial cable
> using the pppd
> One is running Red Hat Linux 4.2 and the other one Red Hat Linux 5.2
>
> what is wrong with this: (!?)
>
> pppd -detach lock crtscts [localip]:[remoteip] /dev/modem 38400 &
>
> i have no getty installed
> routing is not an issue here
> isn't the ppp0 device supposed to show up when i run ifconfig ?
>
> help is greatly appreciated
>
> Morten Johansen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /usr over nfs?
Date: 7 Jan 1999 08:55:11 GMT
Markus Hauke spoke these words of wisdom:
: Hello,
: I�d like to install Linux on a Network of about 10 PC�s. One of them
: should be a nfs server with lots of disk space. My question is:
: Is it possible to install my Linux distribution with all the needed
: programs on the server and then do a "mount -t nfs server:/usr /usr" on
: all clients???
: On the clients should only run a minimal Linux system, so that they can
: boot on their own and then do mount the /usr tree from the server.
Hi Markus,
I believe you can do it, you should only leave /sbin, /bin
on the local machines. But /usr should be available early on during
booting, as /usr/sbin holds many inet daemons, yp stuff etc, at least
on my system. So, it might work if you make sure that /usr is mounted
at boot time, along with the other file systems. Otherwise, make sure
you move all important binaries from /usr/sbin etc to another place,
which might involve changing e.g. /etc/inetd.conf.
Bye,
Michael
--
<< the above email addr might disappear, reply to: >>
<< Michael.Sievers -(at)- desy.de >>
Black holes are where God divided by zero.
------------------------------
From: "Alexandre Cassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: H323 and VOIP
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:05:13 +0100
Hi,
I am searching all that i can find on the H323 protocols implementations on
linux. I want to test VOIP on my linux box
Can some body send me some url or ftp sites where i can find existing
implementation of this ?
Thanx
--
Alexandre Cassen - INSA de Lyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 14:29:08 -0500
From: Mark Krischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: does anybody know how to connect to an NT4 share using smbclient?
help!
i've been trying to connect to NT4 for file and printer shares using
smbclient.
i'm not trying to set up a samba server on linux. i think i'm compiled
to use encryption. i can't run the .reg file to turn it off on NT
'cause i don't own the server. i had this working once before. there
was some magic incantation that needed to be made for NT4, i think. i
have no recolection what that was, and now i can't connect.
strange thing though, i can connect fine using smbmount! unfortunately,
this doesn't help me with printing, otherwise i'd leave it at that.
please help! i'm sick of booting to windows!
thanks in advance!
--mk
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
