Linux-Networking Digest #806, Volume #10 Sat, 10 Apr 99 01:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: telnet to host as root (Warren Watts)
Re: @home & email... (Jerry Gardner)
Re: Linux as NetWare Server? ("Donald E. Stidwell")
Re: DHCP and MediaOne Express (xavier cable)
Re: Apache and UserDir (Leslie Mikesell)
Linux server & "hotfix" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WWW server ("CyberCode")
Re: Networking ("Eugene")
Linux as NetWare Server? ("David R. Christianson")
Re: firewalls (ie: fwtk) vs. Ip Masquerading... (Ian Cottrell)
ftp and telnet from windows 98 to redhat linux (Richard Goodrum)
NT Server - Linux Internet Wiorksation (Rick Johnson)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("news.optus.com.au")
Re: Sendmail, what use ("Eugene")
Packet driver and Netboot bootprom ("Michael")
Re: Network Printer (Linux + MacOS + HP JetDirect) (Keith Keller)
Re: ppp 2.3.7 giving errors (Jack Bowling)
Re: 3c905B & 2.2.4 kernel (MystVideo)
Anybody knows about ttloop? (JCA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Warren Watts)
Subject: Re: telnet to host as root
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 03:02:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:14:11 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca
Filipozzi) wrote:
>In article <7ee36c$g0g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>says...
>> While trying to login as root from a95pc (samba connection)
>> by telnet i get msg "login inncorect"
>> why ?
>> (other users can login fine ..)
>>
>>
>>
>It's a security feature. When you attempt to login, your username and
>password are send in CLEAR text. Anybody with a packet sniffer can pick
>off this packet and hack your system.
>
>If you want to log in as root, do one of the following:
>
>1) login as a normal user and run /bin/su
I was having the same problem, and your answer worked prefectly!
Thanx!
Warren Watts
------------------------------
From: Jerry Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @home & email...
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 03:25:40 GMT
Dima Pasechnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Pallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ------------------------
> I imagine the only problem might be with e-mail - the users on this
> micro-network would have to use some web-based email service...
> (not such a big problem with good connectivity provided by the cable,
> anyway).
> Please correct me if I'm wrong here...
@Home allows you to have up to three different email addresses. I take
advantage of this my using Fetchmail to fetch from all three mailboxes
and route it to the three users on my LAN.
Unfortunately, you need the special @Home version of Netscape to set up the
alternate email boxes. I used by wife's Win95 laptop to do this.
------------------------------
From: "Donald E. Stidwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as NetWare Server?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:45:22 +0000
"David R. Christianson" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This may sound wierd, but is there any package that will make Linux act
> like a NetWare server (like samba does for NT)? There is no productive
> reason why I want to do this, except to try something different and
> maybe do some performance comparisons.
>
> Dave
I believe Caldera has a package that does just this. Check on their
website for their Netware package.
Don
--
=====================================
Donald E. Stidwell, RM1, USN (Ret.)
Certified Novell Administrator
Network Technican II
Bon Secours Hampton Roads Home Care
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
=====================================
------------------------------
From: xavier cable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP and MediaOne Express
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:32:45 +0200
> Hello,
> I just recently got my Linux box up, and I bought a cable modem. I am using
> Debian 2.1, kernel 2.2.5, dhcpcd-1.3.17-pl2, 3c509b which is detected and
> works. I read the DHCP Howto but it does nothing for Troubleshooting. Here
> is my problem.
>
> Dhcpcd gets the IP and assigns it etc no errors, although if I ping any site
> OTHER then my assigned IP I get network unreachable errors. So I checked
> the routing. I first saw a route with the destination 24.29.240.0 and the
> gateway as *. This seemed weird so I tried to remove it, although the
> command route Del -net 24.29.240.0 fails. Why is this happening? Any help
> would be helpful.
>
> Reply back by Email or to the Newsgroup. Thanks.
Just try to type :
route add default eth0
if your network card is eth0 of course.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: Apache and UserDir
Date: 9 Apr 1999 18:34:16 -0500
In article <7ejrq5$4bk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Hennen III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wish that that were the problem. The directory can be read access enable
>for all users and there is an index.html file. In the access.conf file I
>basically copied the entry for /home/httpd/html/ and changed the directory
>to /home/*/public_html/ Is there something I am missing?
The apache error_log should tell you exactly what file it was trying
to access and what error was encountered.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux server & "hotfix"
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:51:09 GMT
Novell Netware has a feature called "hotfix" that checks the integrity of
data written to the drive and puts the data elsewhere if it appears that a
sector is bad (and marks that sector as "bad"); NT has a similar feature, I
believe. Does Linux have something like this or is there an add-on from
somewhere? Thanks in advance for comments. David C.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "CyberCode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WWW server
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:54:04 -0400
I am setting up a www server using Redhat 5.2. Got the Static ip, got it
registered. Configured the server. I can connect to the server using a
browser if I use domainname.com, but when I try www.domainname.com I cannot
connect. Any hints/clues will be greatly appreciated.
Charles Stallings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 02:26:39 GMT
The original poster was either a troll or a complete dumbass. Don't even
waste your time replying
What is MSCE? Must Consult Someone Experienced.
--
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <2BqP2.1217$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > go away, dumbass
> > You are a typical Microsoft "sysadmin" who doesn't know anything besides
> > point-and-click.
>
> Now he really won't try Linux.... good job.
>
> To answer the original poster's question... don't know of automatic tool,
> but using an ip or port scanner will show you all the machines in an ip
> address range. It's considered VERY inappropriate to scan machines that
> you don't control (makes me wonder what you might be looking for...) but
> doing it in the domain you're legally administering isn't.
>
> A tool like nmap will tell you a whole bunch about the machines in your
> network.... probably more than you need to know. Or a shell script that
> attempts to ping every ip address and reports which ones replied...
>
> But automatically drawing this? Showing hubs and cable drops... no way.
> How would such a tool identify unmanaged hubs and passive drops. You can
> only determine premise cabling layout by inspection.
>
> So... at best, an automatic tool **might** be able to find all the used
> ip addresses, **might** be able to talk to managed hubs and switches to
> find out their used ports and which MAC addresses are on each port, and
> **might** be able to associate each ip/mac with a port.
>
> This assumes, of course, that the tool knows how to talk your <insert
> vendor name here> switch to get all of this information, and that the
> switch can dump this info.
>
> Hope this answers your question if it doesn't solve your problem.
>
> Luca
> --
> Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "David R. Christianson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux as NetWare Server?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:27:47 GMT
Hi,
This may sound wierd, but is there any package that will make Linux act
like a NetWare server (like samba does for NT)? There is no productive
reason why I want to do this, except to try something different and
maybe do some performance comparisons.
Dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Cottrell)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: firewalls (ie: fwtk) vs. Ip Masquerading...
Date: 10 Apr 1999 02:22:33 GMT
Eric ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Curt wrote in message <9laP2.517$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
:
: 2 questions come to mind - what makes you feel that the proxy server is more
: secure? The fact that packets can not be "faked"? That they actually must
: be valid packets at the application level? I guess this helps cut off a lot
: of spoofing and packet level attacks, but is it realistically that much more
: secure?
I'm afraid that I also think that proxy firewalls are more secure, if only
because they basically deny everything, only passing those things for which
you install a proxy. Much less chance of forgetting something nasty.
With a filter, if you forget to filter something, it could bite you.
I run a dual-homed RH5.2 box with fwtk and am very happy with it.
: How do you handle UDP & ICMP packets with a proxy server? From what I
: understand, the new SOCKS server (Nec V. 5) can be configured to handle UDP,
: but what about ICMP?
I don't run any UDP, but there is a fwtk add-on for it somewhere, though I've
never tried it. As for ICMP, I just don't allow it through the firewall.
There are some negatives with that, but for my small home network, no real
problems. If I really need to ping or traceroute, I can telnet (well, ssh
really) to the firewall and do it from there.
: Secondly, which is easier to configure when it comes to Dynamic IP
: addresses - either due to dial on demand, or more importantly, when a
: company renews your IP address (ie: in the case of cable modem and/or
: ADSL)....
My f/w is connect to a cable modem which uses DHCP. No problems. I never
actually mention the ip of the outside interface in any of my setup files,
so I don't care what it is or if it changes. Anyway, if it really did
matter, the DHCP client permits a script to be run at the end of it's
acquisition phase, so I could easily write something to extract the IP
number from an ifconfig and paste into as many other scripts or files
as necessary.
Inside network runs a /24 segment from RFC1819 (?? - think thats right
- 192.168.xx.0/24 anyway), and again, no problems.
: Thanks!
:
: Eric
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, I must admit that I don't run anything very fancy. My f/w permits
http, ftp, telnet, pop3 & smtp, nntp and realaudio to pass through it.
That's more than enough for me and my family.
Looking after a large commercial firewall is part of my duties at work,
so I'm fairly knowledgeable about the operation of firewalls et al. And
I just prefer proxy firewalls to packet filters.
This is, of course, my own personal opinion and reflects in no way, the
opinions of my employer. I also cast no aspersions on anyone whose
opinion may differ from mine.
--
============================================================================
Ian Cottrell office email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief, Internet Services personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Justice office: (613) 941-5233
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON, Canada
============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Goodrum)
Subject: ftp and telnet from windows 98 to redhat linux
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 02:58:09 GMT
I am able to ping the linux boxes from the windows 98 system. I am
able to ping, ftp, and telnet from my windows 95 system. However, I
cannot get the windows 98 system to ftp or telnet to my linux boxes.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Richard.
------------------------------
From: Rick Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NT Server - Linux Internet Wiorksation
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:54:58 -0700
Greetings.
I have an NT 4 server with a cable modem, running WinGate 3. The
NT server successfully servers Internet to the rest of my network,
consisting of 2 Windows 98 clients and a Macintosh client. I can
successfully configure Netscape on the Linux station to work through the
proxy server but I am having very limited success configuring the
general TCP/IP networking on the Linux station. When I ping, the name
is resolved to an IP address, but that is it - I do not get ping times.
I can not send mail with PINE nor can I FTP or TELNET. I am running Red
Hat 5.2.
I appreeciate any assistance that anyone has to offer.
- Rick
------------------------------
From: "news.optus.com.au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 04:24:36 GMT
I'm sorry!!?? Are you suggesting the dingo is endangered? Take a trip to
Fraser Island where you can't take a leak behind a bush without tripping
over one (or 5)
PS: Is this off topic? Nahh
James Thompson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I tend to use endangered or extinct animals:
>
>e.g: uakari, indris, dingo, etc.
>
>No particular green message to this, but they are a bit different. My old
>university used to use Scottish islands - also quite good - there are loads
>of them. (As there are endangered species...)
>
>J.T.
>
>Ramsay D. Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Daniel Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - ->
>> - ->I generally use the names of players in Man United for my local
>network and
>> - ->thier corresponding Shirt no's for ips..vis
>> - ->[ snip snip ]
>>
>> - ->
>> - ->> We use (at work) countries. Additionally, we name disks (actually
>mount
>> - ->> points) after cities in that country. This helps admin since we
can
>> - ->> always figure out what machine a disk is on.
>> - ->>
>> - ->> This is coming from a GIS company, so go figure.
>>
>> For a few years I've been accumulating machines and have been
>> thinking how to go about setting up an internal network. I've
>> seen naming conventions that always were pretty much topical.
>>
>> One network I know of uses a sea related theme with almost
>> every name starting with an 's', starfish, sooshi, seaweed,
>> shrimp, sucker, etc.
>>
>> But I like that GIS company's solution of using a country
>> name and then naming mount points for citys within the
>> country! Talk about tracking down a problems being a cinch!
>>
>> Maybe I'll name my machines after Baseball teams and the
>> mount point names can be well known players from those teams.
>> Now, I wonder if I can rename 'root' to manager names from
>> those teams?
>>
>>
>> - --
>>
>>
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--+
>> | Ramsay D. Seielstad | [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|
>> | Schenectady, NY | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>|
>>
>+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-
>=-+
>> | "No fancy terminators or trailers, No opinion, Just an average,
everyday
>|
>> | guy with a bunch of unrelated hobbyist activities that have no
>significant |
>> | use or value other than to amuse myself and occupy my free time ...
and
>|
>> | trust me, these ain't MY employer's opinions or views"
>|
>>
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--+
>> | To obtain my PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|
>>
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--+
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: 2.6.2
>>
>> iQCVAwUBNvlIERh6cbDiY22VAQH7hAQAmdR6OU2l0/igcuI61NReDeV45hKvfHM+
>> QvpU7EM10Vrci0+n76nnNsj9kco9RgeYvXnnTN0rbo5IdH2cBpKl0oOvhU+rhGS/
>> UREVc11JsEqw759PYxHyhuiqPOFISSHyRX+Yw/wcp8iFY0SY4jOL8Q3L9TJiBjA1
>> 3nfqFqx5RO4=
>> =B+iq
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail, what use
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 02:41:33 GMT
yes, there is. All the daemons will send you email to inform you about
errors, status, etc. An MTA (mail transport agent) is required for that.
--
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
mike dombrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My machine is sitting on a network as a client, not a masqurading
> server or anything. So is there any reason to run sendmail?
>
> Thanks
> Mike
------------------------------
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Packet driver and Netboot bootprom
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:52:48 +0100
Hi:
I am trying to build a bootprom (Netboot) which requires a packet driver for
the card.
Okay, I am slow. What is a packet driver and would it be on the DOS disk
that came with the cards. If so, where might it be and what would the file
extension likely be?
The card is an Acer ALN320 so I am doubtful that bootprom images already
exist.
Thanks in advance,
Michael
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith Keller)
Subject: Re: Network Printer (Linux + MacOS + HP JetDirect)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 04:46:55 GMT
Hi Nick,
You actually have to assign the IP address to the printer yourself,
generally. (Well, you could configure DHCP to do it, but that's
more work than I'd be willing to put in.) You should be able to
input the IP address from the printer's control panel, or, if
you have the HP JetDirect software for Mac (is it even made for
Macs?), you can use it to assign an IP. If you're using IP
masquerading with so-called illegal IP addresses, then you can
simply pick an unused IP in your subnet. If you're using official
IPs, it might be more complicated, but the principle is the same.
You may also be able to get away with an arp entry. My network
print server works with a command like so:
arp -s printer.domain.net FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
where the FF's are the actual hardware address of the device.
My man pages don't specify whether you can substitute an IP
address for the domain name, but I'd guess that you can. I'm
also not clear whether the JetDirect card will like this ARP
entry.
Finally, you'll probably need to manipulate your printcap
file a little bit more to accomodate an HP printer. Sadly,
I don't remember what was funny about them, or even where
to find docs on what to do. They're out there somewhere,
though, I'm sure.
-- Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <7el3r1$jf8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nick B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi:
> I was hoping to use lpr to remotely print to the HP LaserJet from any of the
> Linux boxes. But I believe that I need some information that I'm having a
> difficult time finding. In particular, I think I would need to know/assign an
> IP address to the JetDirect card in the LaserJet printer in order to set it
> up as a remote printer for lpr. I can print the SELF TEST page on the printer
> which identifies the ethernet card's hardware address, and even gives the
> Appletalk Name (LaserJet 4) for the printer, but it does not give any
> assigned IP address. I've tried various permutations of the Appletalk
> Name/HW_ADDR in the /etc/printcap and assignments in the /etc/hosts files,
> but none seem to allow remote printing.
>
> I've tried to see if I can get the Mac to identify the assigned IP address of
> the printer, but I couldn't figure out how to do this. Is there some way,
> under Linux, to query the LAN and read both the hardware addresses and the
> assigned IP addresses? Is there a way to have Linux assign an IP to the
> JetDirect ethernet card in the printer which will still work for the Mac?
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Nick Bourbaki
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Bowling)
Subject: Re: ppp 2.3.7 giving errors
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 03:07:43 GMT
On 8 Apr 1999 21:01:32 -0500, Clifford Kite <kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>: I _am_ an ISP, and I run with AsyncMap 0 always. pppd 2.3.7 died in this way
>: for me as well when I put it up on one of our dialin boxes in the wee hours
>: of this morning. As I type, the box has been "reverted" to 2.3.6 and that
>: seems to have fixed it (no other changes).
>
>: In case it matters, the box is kernel 2.0.36 (a RedHat 5.2 install) and I
>: installed pppd from source.
>
>Do you run KDE? In each of the three similar cases I know about
>the poster was running KDE. Two were running kppp and the other one
>probably was also running it. One said that the problem disappeared
>when he switched to pon. Another one said he believed polling the ppp
>interface by kppp, to check whether it was active or not, was involved.
>
>I'm pretty sure the messages that are rejected are the same as some
>of the ASCII messages in pppd's log and are somehow being sent to the
>peer over the ppp connection. However, I'm not convinced that pppd
>2.3.7 is the sole reason it's happening - but neither am I sure that
>it's entirely blameless. And I'd like to find an answer.
Very astute, Clifford. The problems were manifested when using kppp. I
switched to usernet and the default RH 5.2 ppp scripts, put the
required aliases for bsd_comp and ppp_deflate in my conf.modules...
and everything has been smooth sailing ever since. Not sure wherein the
bad kharma between kppp and pppd-2.3.7 lies, but it appears to be real
to me.
=======
Jack Bowling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: MystVideo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c905B & 2.2.4 kernel
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:35:25 -0400
How about posting an example of a working ifcfg-eth0 file since some of
us have no working machine to look at to find out what those added
lines might be? I've been fiddling around with this blasted Dell GX1
off and on for a couple of weeks trying to get the built-in 3c905B NIC
working with no luck. I downloaded the 2.2.5 kernel and figured have
the NIC module compiled into it.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Janne Kettunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Burt Johnson wrote:
>
> I had same problem with RH 5.2 and 2.0.36 kernel. I foun that
> there was missing /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file. Copied
> ifcfg-lo file in same directory to ifcfg-eth0 and edited correct values
> and added some lines (look example values from other fully workin RH 5.2
> computer. Of course you may have to create /etc/resolv.conf etc netwroking
> files also manually, but thats another story :-)
>
> > I installed RH5.2 and it found my two 905 cards right off the bat. I then
> > proceded to download the 2.2.4 kernel and recompiled it using the latest
> > 3c59x.c from Donald Becker. Now, when I reboot the machine, I get a message
> > stating Delaying eth0 Initialization. When I do the ifconfig, neither eth0
> > nor eth1 appear.
> >
------------------------------
From: JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Anybody knows about ttloop?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 05:07:17 GMT
Sometimes. when receiving a telnet connection at my Linux box,
the following entries are created in my /var/log/messages file:
Mar 3 21:42:45 myHost in.telnetd[14112]: connect from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 3 21:42:46 myHost telnetd[14112]: ttloop: peer died: Success
No entries are generated in my syslog when this happens (at
least not usually.) The call doesn't succeed. Now what the hell is
the meaning of the ttloop line? What event is triggering this logging
immediately after the connection is received? This doesn't happen
all the time, as I can get telnet connections from at least some remote
hosts all right (i.e. from those I have been able to test myself
directly.)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
