Linux-Networking Digest #989, Volume #10 Thu, 29 Apr 99 20:13:40 EDT
Contents:
Re: NT faster than Linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ipportfw patch for 2.0.36 & SuSE 6.0 (tomy)
HELP isdn: seems to connect to ISP but then immidiately disconnects ("marc*")
Re: Home Office Setup ("LJ")
Re: external isdn, ppp and alpha ("Dr. Yuan Liu")
Re: ppp works but no ping (Clifford Kite)
Re: 4 port nic/hub configuration, help? (Mike Frisch)
telnet works but lynx not (L)
Re: ipfwadm setsockopt error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: secureCRT2.4b1 and ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2 (Michael Balderas)
Calibri Firewall/Router on Ebay. ("Jack Levin")
Re: Linux Uptimes ("Bob Marley")
Re: Compaq NC3121 Problems ("Ronald L. Chichester")
linux friendly isp's ("Nevyn")
Re: what is listening to a port ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Nagle's algorithm implementation (Martin Kammerhofer)
Re: Weird DHCP behavior ("Jan Chab")
Re: ipportfw patch for 2.0.36 & SuSE 6.0 (tomy)
Re: Pop3 email account ("Ian Lunam")
NT PDC and samba 2.0.3 smbpasswd problem.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.samba,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: NT faster than Linux?
Date: 29 Apr 1999 20:49:14 GMT
In the sacred domain of uk.comp.os.linux didst Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> eloquently scribe:
: They have invited Linus to set up the machine. One thing to remember
: though is that this is like inviting Bill Gates to set up an NT machine,
I doubt Gates knows ANYTHING about configuring windows. He's hardly a
programmer after all....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |
| Andrew Halliwell | "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| Finallist in:- | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
==============================================================================
|GCv3.12 GCS>$ d-(dpu) s+/- a C++ US++ P L/L+ E-- W+ N++ o+ K PS+ w-- M+/++ |
|PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ X+/X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D+ G e>e++ h/h+ !r!| Space for hire |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: tomy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipportfw patch for 2.0.36 & SuSE 6.0
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:40:11 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to add that masquerading _is_ compiled in and working great on this
machine.
Tom wrote:
> I have downloaded and applied the patch w/o errors or rej files, but the
> CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPPORTFW option is not coming up in config and does
> not show up in the .config file. It's not a very complex procedure and
> I have gone over the couple lines of instructions carefully, but am
> still scratching my head. Is there something unique to the kernel
> source in this distribution?
>
> :Tom
------------------------------
From: "marc*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP isdn: seems to connect to ISP but then immidiately disconnects
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:37:52 +0200
hi,
I followed all bewan's instructions (gazel pci).
here's my /var/log/messages
if you can help i'd be grateful. Marc.
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: delrule name rule ... delete
timeout-rule
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: showrules name show all
timeout-rules
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: flushrules name rule-type delete all
timeout-rules of a spec. type
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: flushallrules name delete all
timeout-rules
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: default name rule-type ... set default
for a spec. rule-type
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: budget name type ... set various
budgets
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: showbudgets name show
budget-settings
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: savebudgets name output
budget-settings for later restore
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: restorebudgets name ... restore
budget-settings
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: writeconf [file] write the
settings to file
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: readconf [file] read the
settings from file
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Note: TIMRU Ctrl Extension-Support
enabled
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Note: TIMRU Kernel Support enabled
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Security for ippp0 is on
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: EAZ/MSN for ippp0 is 0388
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Encapsulation for ippp0 is syncppp
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Layer-2-Protocol for ippp0 is hdlc
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost local: Layer-3-Protocol for ippp0 is trans
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost innfeed[457]: decwrl can't resolve hostname:
news1.pa.dec.com : (Host name lookup failure)
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost innfeed[457]: decwrl spooling no active
connections
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost innfeed[457]: uunet can't resolve hostname:
news.uunet.uu.net : (Host name lookup failure)
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost innfeed[457]: uunet spooling no active connections
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost ipppd[517]: Found 1 device: /dev/ippp0
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost rc: Starting local succeeded
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost ipppd[518]: ipppd i2.2.10 (isdn4linux version of
pppd by MH) started
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost ipppd[518]: init_unit: 0
Apr 29 20:42:40 localhost ipppd[518]: Connect[0]: /dev/ippp0, fd: 8
Apr 29 20:42:50 localhost PAM_pwdb[521]: (login) session opened for user
root by (uid=0)
Apr 29 20:42:50 localhost login[521]: ROOT LOGIN ON tty1
Apr 29 20:42:50 localhost PAM_pwdb[521]: (login) session closed for user
root
Apr 29 20:43:13 localhost kernel: ippp0: dialing 0 0388150399...
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost kernel: isdn_net: ippp0 connected
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: Local number: 0388, Remote number:
0388150399, Type: outgoing
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED,
ifunit: 0, linkunit: 0, fd: 8
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): Invalid argument, 6
ippp0 1600.
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: Remote message: Access denied for user
"RNIS229"^M Cannot open RADIUS session (access denied)^M
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: CHAP authentication failed
Apr 29 20:43:15 localhost ipppd[518]: LCP terminated by peer
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: Connection terminated.
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost kernel: isdn_net: local hangup ippp0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost kernel: ippp0: Chargesum is 0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: taking down PHASE_DEAD link 0,
linkunit: 0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: closing fd 8 from unit 0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: link 0 closed , linkunit: 0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: reinit_unit: 0
Apr 29 20:43:18 localhost ipppd[518]: Connect[0]: /dev/ippp0, fd: 8
Apr 29 20:43:19 localhost kernel: isdn: HiSax,ch0 cause: E0710
Apr 29 20:43:39 localhost innd[449]: s
------------------------------
From: "LJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Home Office Setup
Date: 29 Apr 1999 21:38:03 GMT
If the router is a cisco 2501 ... you'll need an HD60-v24 (dte) cable into
your modem.
June Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<7ga2da$4t9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to setup a home office like the following: Please advise.
>
> ISP
> |
> |
> 56K modem (dce)
> |
> |
> serial int (dte)
> 2501
> e0
> |
> |
> home office(private ip addr)
>
> 1. Can I connect the 56k modem to the serial int ? What cable and
connector
> I have to use ?
>
> 2. Should I use static IP addr/DNS/default-route assignment from
> the ISP ?
>
> 3. If so, what should be the router config ? DDR, NAT...
>
> 4. What should be the network config (e.g. dns) for the home office
machines
> ?
>
> Thanks,
> June
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Dr. Yuan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha
Subject: Re: external isdn, ppp and alpha
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:47:21 GMT
Laurent Bartholdi wrote:
> changing only minimally the config (send ATB4 to use async ppp, and
> baudrate 115200),
> and though the link goes up fine, very few packets actually go through.
Is your ISP using async? I use a Motorola BitSurf Pro (obsolete) with
an ancient IBM that has only 16450. I don't use async and it works.
> the really weird thing is that with windows nt i works fine! thus i
> suspect it is a problem with pppd or the
> kernel. now how could things work at 14'400 but not at 64'000 baud?
Perhaps there are some init strings? (Windows NT driver may have those
strings.)
> laurent
--
+--- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------- http://www.ChiTech.ca/ ---+
| Dr. Yuan LIU - Chitech Technologies Inc. |
+------- (514)281-0494 ------------------ FAX (514)281-0493 ------+
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp works but no ping
Date: 29 Apr 1999 15:15:36 -0500
Keith Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
<snip>
: Note that in ppp0 interface above I can ping the IP address given to the
: local machine 208.146.132.190 just fine. However, when I try to ping
: 208.146.132.33 my harddrive rattles constantly and I notice the 'SD' (send
: data) light on my modem flashing about once every second. This goes on
: forever until I CTRL-C to stop the ping.... I then try other inet services
: such as ftp and telnet... no such luck. I then look at my routing tables
<snip>
The ppp0 interface and the routing looked OK>
: exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug 7 kdebug 4 lock modem crtscts /dev/ttyS1 38400 \
: asyncmap 0 escape FF kdebug 7 $LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
: netmask $NETMASK defaultroute name *** connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
The `debug' option doesn't take a parameter. The `7' may be part or all
of the problem, it will be interpreted as the speed for pppd to use. The
`38400' that comes later may not override the `7'.
The ppp negotiation messages are in another file, usually /var/log/debug
for slackware. The actual log file is configured in /etc/syslog.conf, look
for a line starting with *.=debug or something similar. "man syslog.conf"
It's remotely possible for /etc/syslog.conf to be configured so that every
byte pppd sends to the peer is logged. Check the logs in /var/log to see
how large they are and what's in them.
Some other things. Lose the `escape FF' option it can cause trouble.
Lose the `netmask $NETMASK' option, this is usually meaningless on a
PPP link. Lose the `kdebug' options, they are seldom required to debug
PPP, make reading the log files difficult, and will result in the
log file growing rapidly. BTW `kdebug 7' includes `kdebug 4', "man pppd."
: Here's a snippet from my /var/log/messages (after it goes
through all the : chat stuff and establishes the serial connection)... it
says going up for IP : packets! I would assume that all would be ok at
this point.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Frisch)
Subject: Re: 4 port nic/hub configuration, help?
Date: 29 Apr 1999 20:35:26 GMT
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:30:48 -0500, Scott MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Right now it shows up as eth0. But to activate the other three ports do I
>just set it up as 4 seperate interfaces(eth0, eth1, eth2, eth3), or do I
>just use ip aliasing(eth0:1, eth0:2, etc)? Any help would be greatly
>appreciated!
It's 4 distinct Ethernet interfaces, so you need an eth0: to eth3:
Mike.
--
======================================================================
Mike Frisch Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Northstar Technologies WWW: http://saturn.tlug.org/~mfrisch
Newmarket, Ontario, CANADA
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L)
Subject: telnet works but lynx not
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:13:48 +0200
Yo, telnet and ping work fine, but lynx says cant resolve hostname.
kdial says pppdaemon died unexpectatly, but telnet works...
(Suse 6.0, wvdial)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfwadm setsockopt error
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 18:14:44 GMT
yes, firewalling was compiled into the kernel..
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > ok, i'm currently running SuSE 6.0 (2.0.36) and i'm trying to set up the
> > ipfwadm, but with no luck.
> > after entering in
> >
> > darwood:~ # ipfwadm -F -p deny
> > ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available
> >
> > darwood:~ # ipfwadm -F -a m -s 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> > ipfwadm: multiple commands specified
> >
> > this is what i got from the man pages, and what i used with redhat (2.0.35)
> > what am i missing here?
> > any help with this would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Is the firewall option compiled into the kernel?
>
> Paul
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: mike*no*spam*@yourhelpdesk.com (Michael Balderas)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh
Subject: Re: secureCRT2.4b1 and ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 18:28:27 GMT
Speeking from experience, I struggled with the same problem myself for
alomst 6 weeks and never found a solution. I went back to running SSH1
on my servers and I am waiting till VanDyke releases a SSH2 compatible
version of SecureCRT
On 28 Apr 1999 17:37:17 PDT, Pinghua Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've installed ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2, and I am using secureCRT2.4b1
>to test it out. I can't seem to get the public key and private key to
>work though. I've generated the keys, and put my public key in the file
>$HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys as a single line on the linux box. But I got
>"server does not recognize your public key" when I try to use RSA for
>authentication.
>
>My sshd2 is configured to use ssh1 if clients can't support ssh2.
>
>Any ideas what's wrong?
>
>Thanks!
------------------------------
From: "Jack Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Calibri Firewall/Router on Ebay.
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:44:33 -0700
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.modems.cable,comp.dcom.xdsl,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.portable,comp.security.firewalls
Hi all... Check out Calibri-133 firewall being sold at Ebay. (hardware)
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=97714586
-Jack
------------------------------
From: "Bob Marley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Uptimes
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:18:55 GMT
I personally have never seen a windows NT box, either by me or someone else,
stay up longer than 30-60 days without needing a reboot for one reason or
another.
Jan Johansson wrote in message <7g95ht$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>One thing about uptimes i wonder about is:
>
>Why is people obsessed with them? Atleast in my line of work "service
>availability" is more important, The NT rigs i am doing some consulting on
>mow has got to have atleast a 99.91% service availability per year (ok ok..
>ad some decimals, the real figure is "no more then 8 hours of downtime per
>year"), INCLUDING scheduled maintenance.. And they handle it without a
>problem. Uptime is good, serive availability is better.
>
>(and im not picking a fight here, i just think it is a valid point)
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Ronald L. Chichester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compaq NC3121 Problems
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 17:46:58 -0500
Good luck. I'm having a hell of a time trying to get a Compaq
Netelligent Ethernet NIC (or even a PCI Intel Ethernet Pro 100+) to
work under Linux on the Compaq machine. The problem that I have been
having is an IRQ conflict with the SCSI adapter (the BIOS setting NIC
(any NIC) to IRQ 11 and then the SCSI adapter then being set to IRQ
11). Incidentally, either NIC/SCSI combination will work under WinNT
without difficulty. Evidently, there is something in the Compaq setup
that is messing up the settings which they somehow fix under NT. I
even tried to set the IRQ for the NIC directly in a kernel parameter
to no avail. There is something seriously wrong here.
If you find an answer, please let me know.
Ron Chichester
Jon Eichelberger wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to use an Compaq NC3121 Fast Ethernet NIC Card with
> Linux? If so, please give me the particulars of the driver you used, etc.
> and where I need to go to get the required software, if indeed I don't
> already have it somewhere on my distribution. Thanks!
>
> Jon Eichelberger
------------------------------
From: "Nevyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux friendly isp's
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 19:59:18 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=======_NextPart_000_0009_01BE927A.C4179DA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
....can anyone please suggest a nice friendly isp for me to use with =
linux.....preferably free...i have attempted to access my freeserve =
acount but it wont let me for some reason......accepts username and =
password but then stops working........if anyone can suggest a solution =
i'd be greatful
=======_NextPart_000_0009_01BE927A.C4179DA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3DBibleScrT size=3D3>....can anyone =
please suggest a=20
nice friendly isp for me to use with linux.....preferably free...i have=20
attempted to access my freeserve acount but it wont let me for some=20
reason......accepts username and password but then stops =
working........if=20
anyone can suggest a solution i'd be greatful</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
=======_NextPart_000_0009_01BE927A.C4179DA0==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what is listening to a port
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 22:56:26 GMT
: script that would properly identify id all ports and their owners
: by going through the /proc directory, but I haven't had time to
: convert the sucker to work with 2.2* yet. I looked in the man manpages
: for fuser but I didn't see anything that helped.
As a follow up to my own post I finally got off my but and redid
the perlscript I mentioned.This is a sample of the output.
out [greg] ~/code$ ./connects
==========tcp Connection Stats========
l: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:22 r: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:1048 s: 01 u: root p: 11106
Cline: /usr/local/sbin/sshd
l: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1781 r: zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz :6000 s: 01 u: root p: 10436
Cline: -xterm:0
l: 0.0.0.0:8080 r: 0.0.0.0:0 s: 0A u: root p: 9096
Cline: ../bin/httpd
l: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx :1753 r: 207.161.152.101:6667 s: 01 u: greg p: 3856
Cline: BitchX Mynick irc.total.net
[SNIP]
Now this is a simple perls script and since I'm new to perl I'm sure
there are far better ways to do what I've hacked my way through.
If anyone gives it a try and finds that it could be done in a much
easier/faster way, please let me know. you can grab the source from
http://www.phaze.org/linux
connects.pl is the version for 2.1+ and connectsold.pl is for 2.0+
--
---
Sometimes you can learn more by watching an idiot
than you can by listening to a genius.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Kammerhofer)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Nagle's algorithm implementation
Date: 29 Apr 1999 19:20:15 GMT
Chandrashekhar M Naik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I am to implement the Nagle's algorithm.
:
: I am trying to catch up with how it is implemented on Linux.
I never looked at the Linux stack. In BSD just look at the file
netinet/tcp_output.c. Nagle's alg. is that what is turned off by
option TCP_NODELAY.
:
: 1. How do we check that we have only one outstanding packet to be
: acknowledged ?
Nagle means to send only if there are no outstanding acknowledgements
(and certain other conditions are also met).
:
: 2. Where do we store the unsent data ?
It stays in the socket buffer.
HTH,
Martin
------------------------------
From: "Jan Chab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Weird DHCP behavior
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 01:38:45 +0200
Hello,
thank you for your mail: please look at my reactions in the text below:
Johannes Niess a écrit dans le message : 7g4fp8$7da$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Jan Chab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
>
> >I have RH 5.2 and I have been trying for more than 5 days to setup the
cable
> >network connection thru DHCPcd. I downloaded the latest dhcpcd version
then
> >compiled it and it seemed to work well. But when I try to activate the
eth0
> >interface with the DHCP option (through RH's netcfg or with "ifup eth0")
the
> >output is:
>
> >Using DHCP for eth0... failed.
>
> >And "ifconfig" shows only the local loopback, not the eth0. I also
> >configured the "activate at boot" option and during the boot I get a
similar
> >message:
>
> >Using DHCP for eth0... modprobe: cannot locate net-pf-17
> >failed.
>
> >I can define the alias for net-pf-17 as "off" in /etc/conf.modules, and
in
> >that case I don't get the "cannot locate" message; still, the network is
> >unreachable because the eth0 is never configured.
>
> Hello Jan,
>
> The module for your ethernet card is missing. It looks like you
> compiled your own kernel and forgot
>
> make modules; make modules_install
>
> No programm can work without the module.
>
> Johannes Niess
>
I compiled the modules and installed them. I have still the same problem.
The ethernet card IS recognized by Linux, here is the log:
Apr 30 00:38:25 daneel kernel: ne2k-pci.c:v0.99L 2/7/98 D. Becker/P.
Gortmaker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ne2k-pci.html
Apr 30 00:38:25 daneel kernel: ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek
RTL-8029' at I/O 0xe400, IRQ 12.
Apr 30 00:38:25 daneel kernel: eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xe400, IRQ 12,
00:00:E8:E3:C9:A7.
Apr 30 00:38:58 daneel dhcpcd[569]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:42:48 daneel dhcpcd[630]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:47:13 daneel dhcpcd[714]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:48:38 daneel dhcpcd[750]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:55:08 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:55:08 daneel dhcpcd[769]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:55:18 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:55:18 daneel dhcpcd[772]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:55:25 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:55:25 daneel dhcpcd[799]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:56:11 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:56:11 daneel dhcpcd[804]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:56:36 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:56:36 daneel dhcpcd[810]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:56:44 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:56:44 daneel dhcpcd[838]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 00:58:42 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 00:58:42 daneel dhcpcd[872]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 01:00:30 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 01:00:30 daneel dhcpcd[880]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
Apr 30 01:02:50 daneel modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
Apr 30 01:02:50 daneel dhcpcd[888]: dhcpStart: socket: Paramhtre invalide.
As you can see, the ethernet card is found, but the DHCPcd does not manage
to configure it. I'm going mad!
When I do 'ifup eth0' I always get "failed".
Thank you for your help!
Jan
------------------------------
From: tomy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipportfw patch for 2.0.36 & SuSE 6.0
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:25:53 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ooops! It looks like I lied -- there was a .rej file, I must've mistyped
the find command wrong.
/usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/Config.in.rej contains:
======= begin =========
***************
*** 16,21 ****
comment 'Protocol-specific masquerading support will be built as
modules.'
if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
bool 'IP: ipautofw masquerading (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW
fi
bool 'IP: ICMP masquerading' CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP
fi
--- 16,22 ----
comment 'Protocol-specific masquerading support will be built as
modules.'
if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
bool 'IP: ipautofw masquerading (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW
+ bool 'IP: ipportfw masq support (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPPORTFW
fi
bool 'IP: ICMP masquerading' CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP
fi
....skipping...
***************
*** 16,21 ****
comment 'Protocol-specific masquerading support will be built as
modules.'
if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
bool 'IP: ipautofw masquerading (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW
fi
bool 'IP: ICMP masquerading' CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP
fi
--- 16,22 ----
comment 'Protocol-specific masquerading support will be built as
modules.'
if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
bool 'IP: ipautofw masquerading (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPAUTOFW
+ bool 'IP: ipportfw masq support (EXPERIMENTAL)'
CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_IPPORTFW
fi
bool 'IP: ICMP masquerading' CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP
fi
========== End ==========
If I insert the new line manually, config honors it, but when compiling I
get errors about undeclared IP_PORTFW_ADD, IP_PORTFW_DEL, and
IP_PORTFW_FLUSH in ip_sockglue.c -- I do not see any other .rej files or
errors in the patch output. Now what? Should I try a virgin, non-SuSE copy
of the kernel?
:Tom
------------------------------
From: "Ian Lunam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pop3 email account
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 10:18:24 +1200
I used to use one called fetchmail but had some reliability problems so I
shifted to fetchpop. They both do the same thing as getpop3 by the sounds of
it.
Ian
Mono wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>The answer lies in getpop3, a nifty daemon that pulls POP3 messages from
whatever server and sticks them in your local mailbox. I can't remember the
homepage at the current moment, but I use it all the time. You can stick it
in the cron and everything.
>
>-Mono
>--
>ShatterSkull Entertainment
>"It's like an embolism...with candy."
>
>----
>
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>WWW: http://www-scf.usc.edu/~wcaskey/index.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT PDC and samba 2.0.3 smbpasswd problem.
Date: 29 Apr 1999 22:45:51 +0100
Hello people.
I've following problem:
NT PDC 4.0 SP 3 and Linux Samba 2.0.3 server (k 2.0.36 SuSE 6.0 glibc).
Before I've upgraded Samba from standard SuSE 6.0 (pl18?) I wrote
script which changes password simultaneously in Linux and NT. After
upgrade script stopped to work and the reason is following: if you
supply correct or incorrect old password
smbpasswd -r NTSERVER -U username
replies:
machine NTSERVER rejected the password change: Error was : User has
insufficient privilege.
Failed to change password entry for username
Did I miss something about password case changes in new Samba?
--
Andrey Nikolaev Ulm university,
Department of Biophysics. Germany.
Email: Andrey.Nikolaev@!get-lost-spammer!.uni-ulm.de
Substitute physik instead of !*! .
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
