Linux-Networking Digest #85, Volume #11 Sat, 8 May 99 17:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: E21xx NIC Bogus Packet Size ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Alan Ford)
Slow linux-win98-samba connection (Gerhard Siegesmund)
Re: IPCHAINS Firewall script? (Mark)
Re: ppp compression problem ("Greg")
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PCI Network Card that definetly work in Linux and Window 98 (bryan)
Re: PCI Network Card that definetly work in Linux and Window 98 (bryan)
Solved (Was: Re: ipchains broken in Debian Potato?) (Tomas Halvarsson)
Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (Linus Torvalds)
Package for mail system in HTML (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Kindler)
ipfwadm to ipchains ("Curt")
Re: Connect Linux box with Win95 using TCP/IP (mist)
Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux (Hugh Fader)
Webalizer web stats program (Benjamin John)
Samba Working but can't HTTP for configuration. ("...Bob")
RoadRunner problems ($)
LinuxPing -> NTping DEC PCI tcp-ip problems (Matt)
Re: Redhat 6.0 and ipfwadm (Kwan Lowe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: E21xx NIC Bogus Packet Size
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 10:59:43 GMT
I just solve this problem today. I took my sound card and internal modem out.
Those card was not probe by Linux. I think it was some IRQ or I/O Address
conflict. May be this can help you.
========================================================
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------D95B14616C65F52051EB7C9A
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I'm using Mandrake-Red Hat 5.3.
>
> Thanks to the Ethernet How-To I've managed to get my Cabletron E2119 NIC
> "working" - that is to say Linux can now find it. Unfortunately, I'm
> now getting a Bogus Packet Size error as indicated by this output from
> dmesg:
>
> e2100.c:v1.01 7/21/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> eth0: E21** at 0x280, 00 00 1D 0B 9E 93, IRQ 11, primary media, memory @
>
> 0xd0000.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 8194, status=0x8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 8194, status=0x8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> VFS: Disk change detected on device 02:00
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xc9 nxpg=0x0.
>
> The full dmesg text is attached in case it it helpful.
>
> I've searched through the How-To files, but can't find anything
> helpful. Yes, I've seen the warning about not using a Cabletron card
> unless it's what you are stuck with - and for the moment I'm stuck with
> it.
>
> Your help & input are appreciated!
>
> --------------D95B14616C65F52051EB7C9A
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> name="MSG0421.txt"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="MSG0421.txt"
>
> Memory: sized by int13 088h
> Console: 16 point font, 400 scans
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25, 1 virtual console (max 63)
> pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory structure at 0x000fff70
> pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory entry at 0xfc855
> pcibios_init : PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc9ef
> Probing PCI hardware.
> Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 33.18 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 46812k/49152k available (748k kernel code, 384k reserved, 1036k data)
> Swansea University Computer Society NET3.035 for Linux 2.0
> NET3: Unix domain sockets 0.13 for Linux NET3.035.
> Swansea University Computer Society TCP/IP for NET3.034
> IP Protocols: IGMP, ICMP, UDP, TCP
> Linux IP multicast router 0.07.
> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_5.6.0 initialized
> Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu using exception 16 error reporting.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... Ok.
> Linux version 2.0.36 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #1 Tue Dec
29 13:11:13 EST 1998
> Starting kswapd v 1.4.2.2
> Serial driver version 4.13 with no serial options enabled
> tty00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> tty01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> PS/2 auxiliary pointing device detected -- driver installed.
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> Ramdisk driver initialized : 16 ramdisks of 4096K size
> hda: WDC AC2700F, 696MB w/64kB Cache, CHS=708/32/63
> hdc: FX001DE, ATAPI CDROM drive
> hdd: WDC AC1170, 162MB w/63kB Cache, CHS=1010/6/55
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> md driver 0.36.3 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8
> scsi : 0 hosts.
> scsi : detected total.
> Partition check:
> hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 >
> hdd: hdd1
> RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
> ppa: Version 1.42
> ppa: Probing port 03bc
> ppa: Probing port 0378
> ppa: SPP port present
> ppa: EPP 1.7
> ppa: Found device at ID 6, Attempting to use EPP 32 bit
> ppa: Found device at ID 6, Attempting to use SPP
> ppa: Communication established with ID 6 using SPP
> ppa: Probing port 0278
> scsi0 : Iomega parport ZIP drive
> scsi : 1 host.
> Vendor: IOMEGA Model: ZIP 100 Rev: D.09
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> Detected scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 6, lun 0
> SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 196608 [96 MB] [0.1 GB]
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: sda4
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Trying to unmount old root ... okay
> Adding Swap: 17100k swap-space (priority -1)
> sysctl: ip forwarding off
> Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> e2100.c:v1.01 7/21/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> eth0: E21** at 0x280, 00 00 1D 0B 9E 93, IRQ 11, primary media, memory @
0xd0000.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 8194, status=0x8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 8194, status=0x8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xf8 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x3c nxpg=0x0.
> Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x18 nxpg=0x0.
> VFS: Disk change detected on device 02:00
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0x10 nxpg=0x0.
> eth0: bogus packet size: 0, status=0xc9 nxpg=0x0.
>
> --------------D95B14616C65F52051EB7C9A--
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Ford)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: 8 May 1999 11:22:16 GMT
On Sat, 08 May 99 10:32:28 GMT, Phil Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've tried not running sendmail, but this is no good because it causes
>fetchmail to stop working too (fetchmail tries to deliver its mail to
>sendmail). There's nothing in the Demon section of the fetchmail FAQ,
>either.
There are several possible solutions to this problem. You could disable SMTP
mail delivery from Demon's end at:
https://www.password.uk.demon.net/
Another solution would be to disable access from Demon's machines to sendmail.
I don't use sendmail myself (I use exim), but I imagine that you can tell it
in one of the config files not to accept connections from *anything* in the
outside world (it shouldn't be configured to allow anything outside the
194.217.242 subnet anyway, apart from your local machine or network).
Finally, why not just use SMTP delivery anyway? It's so much easier.
--
Alan Ford * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DFax: +44 (0)870 1600868
ICQ: 3033272 * WWW: http://www.whirlnet.demon.co.uk/ * PGP: 0x8F807D7D
Demon Newsgroups Info + FAQs: http://www.whirlnet.demon.co.uk/demon/
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 14:33:48 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerhard Siegesmund)
Subject: Slow linux-win98-samba connection
Hello all
I don't know what I am doing wrong. Some people are talking about slow
connections at 250kb/s. My configuration beats them all. I just have
10kb/s if I send files to a win98-computer using smbclient.
I am using version 2.0.3 of Samba and a glibc-2.0.6-System with Linux
2.2.6. I tried some things given in file speed.txt and speed2.txt, but
couldn't find anything that improves the speed of the connect. It works
great in the other direction (with mget). But mput is really slow. Any
oppinions?
TIA
--
cu
--== Jerri ==--
Homepage: http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~siegesm/
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get PGP Public Key
------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPCHAINS Firewall script?
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 21:53:07 +0800
> Has anyone written a good firewall script using ipchains? something similar
> to the ipfwadm one inthe TrinityOS document.
Show the network layout.
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: ppp compression problem
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 09:51:46 -0400
Hello Brian,
For now why dont you turn the VJ compression off,
add novj to your options file. Take a look at pppd man
there is also a nojjccomp switch, This is what I would do
till I found out who and where the problem lies.
Greg.
Brian Modra wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I'm having trouble negotiating ppp with an ISP. My Linux system is
>trying to be the client.
>
>What should I do?
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 13:47:22 GMT
In comp.os.linux.hardware Xin Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the above, I have had no problems with DHCP and my cable modem
> (Time-Warner's RoadRunner in Northeast Ohio, while using an Artisoft
> AE2/NE-2000
I'm on RoadRunner in Syracuse, NY. DHCP worked just fine before
RH6.0. What's different now is that the information for resolv.conf
is _not_ allocated after receiving the dynamic IP and the lease. I
had to enter in the domain and nameserver lines manually. Once I did
that, though, everything worked fine. There must be a way to fix this,
though. On the very bright side, I've had no lockups. I'm using a
3com 3c509b NIC (ISA) and the white Motorola CybrSurfr cable modem.
Greg H.
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PCI Network Card that definetly work in Linux and Window 98
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 13:58:13 GMT
in the 2.2 kernel, this card (on all my machines) is EXTREMELY unstable.
I don't know why - on 2.0.36 it was the best card out there
(price/performance). but for all the 2.2 series, its a dog.
my internet box hangs in days or even minutes if I xfer lots of data
to it at 10/100 speeds. if I use adsl and download a large package
(like rh6.0) it will cause my network to stop working in a few hours.
this sucks ;-(
so, while I USED to love this tulip card, I currently hate it. I
would not recommend a tulip for the new kernel series until someone
(donald?) debugs this sucker and restores stability, the likes of
which we had in 2.0
fyi,
Chris Moseng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I got myself a Netgear FA-310TX 10/100 PCI card and it installed like
: warm butter, if warm butter were plug and play.
: It runs on the tulip driver, and *even came with that driver and
: instructions on how to compile and install it as a module or as a kernel
: component in the install disk.*
: It was very convenient and made my day.
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PCI Network Card that definetly work in Linux and Window 98
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 13:58:51 GMT
Rich Piotrowski <rpiotrow*nospammin'*@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
: On Tue, 04 May 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: >Can anybody suggest a reliable but inexpensive PCI 10/100 Ethernet card that
: >will definetly work in Linux (without re-compiling the kernel) and Windows 98?
: >
: >Regards,
: >Brian
: >
: >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
: >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
: Brian,
: It may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but, I have had good luck with
: the Linksys 10/100 cards. They are only about $30.00 and are supported in the
: later kernels. I am using them in 2.0.36 and 2.2.7 kernels without problem.
: Compile in the DEC "Tulip" chip support.
if you stress the card, it will DEFINITELY hang your network. no
kernel or system hangs, but network will never start until you reboot
your system.
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: Tomas Halvarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Solved (Was: Re: ipchains broken in Debian Potato?)
Date: 8 May 1999 20:03:04 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In <7guq5n$6eu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tomas Halvarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Rusty Russell
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Tomas Halvarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Yesterday, I upgraded my machine from Debian Slink to Debian
>>> Potato. After that, ipchains doesn't work properly. All the rules
>>> I had set up before (denying, logging, forwarding etc.) just went
>>> straight down the toilet.
>>Really? That seems unlikely... I'm a Debian user myself. ipchains
>>hasn't seen any large changes, and IIRC they jumped from 1.3.4 to
>>1.3.8.
>Yup, it's 1.3.8.
>>Do you have any evidence that it's ipchains's fault? Have you tried
>>running it manually.
>Well... I can't anything else to blame. If I choose ACCEPT as
>policy and then flush the rules, everything works OK. And if I
>after that DENY e.g. http, http is blocked but nothing else.
>It seems like it works to have ACCEPT as policy, and blocking out
>stuff, but not having DENY as policy, and accepting selected
>stuff.
I finally found out what was causing the problem. When I was
running Slink, I had this line in my firewall startup script:
# And then we accept packets to already established connections
ipchains -A input -i $EXTIF -p TCP -d $EXTMACHINEIP ! -y -j ACCEPT
Changing that line to this:
# And then we accept packets to already established connections
ipchains -A input -i $EXTIF -p TCP ! -y -j ACCEPT
makes things work as expected under Potato.
Just thought you'd like to know.
/Tomas
=======================================================================
"Only the paranoid survive"
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.pobox.com/~psycho/
http://www.acc.umu.se/~psycho/
=======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
Date: 8 May 1999 20:10:35 GMT
In article <0EXY2.11020$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>my tulip card is totally unreliable. I can bring it down with an ftp
>xfer (local lan) at 10 or 100, in a minute or less. network hangs and
>will NOT be reset by software.
I would recommend the intel eepro100, although I also wonder whether you
just have a flaky tulip card, because tulip would have been my second
suggestion. There's a lot of different tulip-based cards out there..
A 3c509 should be fine too, although with SMP it needs one of the
current v2.2 pre-patches to be stable in some configurations (thanks to
Andrea for figuring out why).
Linus
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Kindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Package for mail system in HTML
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 12:21:43 +0200
Hi all,
does anybody know about a package that provides functionality similiar
to hotmail ?
--
Best regards
J�rgen
================================
Gunkel EDV-L�sungen
Bahnstra�e 23 - 56743 Mendig
Tel.: +49 (0) 26 52 - 98 90 21
Fax.: + 49 (0) 26 52 - 98 90 23
http://www.gunkel.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipfwadm to ipchains
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 09:28:08 -0500
Thought this might be useful to post, saw it on freshmeat.net
http://users.dhp.com/~whisper/ipfwadm2ipchains/ipfwadm2ipchains
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connect Linux box with Win95 using TCP/IP
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 14:49:28 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed to us that -
>I am trying to connect a Linux and a win95 box using TCP/IP. However, I have
>not been able to connect the two. Both machines have working ethernet cards
>and have the correct drivers installed. I think my main problem is
>configuring the Linux side. I have read the NET-3-HOWTO, but it hasnt helped
>me. In anycase, here is how I set up the linux side:
>
>ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
>route add 127.0.0.1
>ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1
>ifconfig eth0 netmask 255.255.255.0
>ifconfig eth0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
Those last three statements can be combined -
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
192.168.0.255 up
(That should all be one line.)
>route add 192.168.0.0 device eth0
You need -
route add -net 192.168.0.0
>
>After doing this, I cant't even ping 192.168.0.1
>
>Anyway, on the Win95 side, I have assigned it IP 192.168.0.2, and
>assigned the gateway as IP 192.168.0.2.
If your intention is to connect to the net with the Linux box and using
IP Masquerading to allow the windows box to use the connection, then the
default gateway needs to be the IP of the Linux box. (192.168.0.1)
HTH
<snip>
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Hugh Fader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 20:05:07 GMT
I have it working. I am also running IP masquerading connected to two internal
Win 95 machines. I have had a great deal of problems with the modem constantly
resetting. I don't think this has anything to do with Linux. When the modem is
working, the performance is great.
Alan Sims wrote:
> Hi Scott. I'm trying to do the same thing, but haven't had any success yet.
> I know it's possible because I found a guy,(through ICQ), in texas who has
> it working. He couldn't help me much though. He has it running as a static
> IP. I also read a couple of things at http://www.linuxhardware.net . I f you
> figure any thing out please post it here & i will do likewise. :-)
>
> Scott Robson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi
> >
> > Im curious if anyone has had any experience using linux with the @HOME
> > cable modem service (www.home.com).
> >
> > I know they do not support it, but is it possible to connect anyway and
> > do they fire wall? static or dynamic ip? Is the general performance of
> > the line good or bad?
> >
> > I'd plan to run a web server and maybe a mail server over it (for
> > completely personal use of course). Anyone have any experience with them?
> >
> > Thanx in Advance
> >
> > Scott
------------------------------
From: Benjamin John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: japan.www.server.apache,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Webalizer web stats program
Date: 08 May 1999 07:31:39 PDT
Any one use the program webalizer to generate stats for their website ?
If so, is there a way that you have set the program up so that the stats
can be generated on the fly ?
say, you go to http://site.com/stats and the stats get generated on the
fly, for that hour,min,sec.
if someone has a setup like this please let me know
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "...Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Working but can't HTTP for configuration.
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 15:30:30 -0400
Reply-To: "...Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings,
I have Samba working in that I can see public and home directories on the
linux box from each of two Win98 boxes. But where I at one time (a prior
'installation') use http://linux1:901/ to access the Samba configuration, I
can't now. (I can though access linuxconfig via http://linux1:98 if it
means anything).
Suggestions?
--
...Bob, NYC
(Newsgroup reply preferred)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($)
Subject: RoadRunner problems
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:35:22 GMT
Hi!
I live in El Paso TX and use Time Warner RR. Been playing with Linux -
I
am a powerful and infulential (translate harried and stressed) LAN
supervisor (translate whipping boy) of the EPISD. I do have lots of
hardware and software to play with. We are using Linux ( Caldera
mostly) in production as DNS, Apache servers, etc. I also manage about
1000 seats on a 80 NW 4.11 LAN/WAN.
Been playing with Red Hat at home. I will be getting 6.0 next week.
I found some old hardware, I am running RH 5.0 (2.0.31) on an HP
Netserver LC 5/133 with an Intel E100B nic. I applied your excellent
scripts ( I had to guess at our login server - I used the DNS/DHCP
address, so that may be part of the problem). All worked swimmingly,
and
I _do_ login - I know I am because if I misconfigure my password in
rrconf, I can't ping or resolve anything).
The puzzling part is this - about 3 minutes after boot, most of the
world becomes unreachable (according to ping). The only thing I can
still ping is my default gateway. Prior to this, I can surf a bit with
Lynx, ping, etc. If I do a traceroute the "unreachable" thing happens
sooner. I never see anything other than * * * in the traces. Name
resolution is fine until it bombs.
This has driven me crazy for about 3 days! If we can fix this, I bet
it
will help a lot of other people in El Paso.
I also did the RH install with "everything" checked, so I am running
named, http, sendmail, etc. I wonder if these daemons are somehow
freaking out RR. I am too newbieish to know how to 'comment them out',
but I am learning fast. I did have a lot of Unix in college, but that
was on a vax and a PDP-11 20 years ago ....
Any suggestions would be great!
$teve Crye
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 15:35:07 +0000
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LinuxPing -> NTping DEC PCI tcp-ip problems
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============B4D408384457E139C86EC51D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, I am having great problems with the configuration of Linux and NT
I have the network stats below.
I am using two DEC PCI cards one has a tcp-ip address of 192.168.10.1
(NT)
the other 192.168.10.2 (Linux).
Many thanks in advance for any help you maybe able to give me.
Matt
NT...
Pinging 192.168.10.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.10.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.10.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.10.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.10.1: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Pinging 192.168.10.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address
Interface Metric
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1 1
192.168.10.1 255.255.255.255
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.10.255 255.255.255.255
192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0
192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255
192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1 1
Route Table
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP 127.0.0.1:1025 127.0.0.1:1026 ESTABLISHED
TCP 127.0.0.1:1026 127.0.0.1:1025 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.10.1:1093 192.168.10.1:139 TIME_WAIT
==============B4D408384457E139C86EC51D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="net.log"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="net.log"
route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 dummy0
212.211.0.254 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
0.0.0.0 212.211.0.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 4 ppp0
ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
dummy0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:C7:99:0D:F4
inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:6 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:5 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe800
ppp0 Link encap:Point-Point Protocol
inet addr:212.211.0.105 P-t-P:212.211.0.254 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:106 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:104 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Ping my own box (itself)
PING 192.168.10.2 (192.168.10.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.10.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
Ping the other box (winNT)
--- 192.168.10.2 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.1 ms
PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1): 56 data bytes
Ping the dummy (a unknown machine)
--- 192.168.10.1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
PING 192.168.10.3 (192.168.10.3): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.10.3 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 dummy0
212.211.0.254 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 ppp0
192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 212.211.0.254 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 ppp0
==============B4D408384457E139C86EC51D==
------------------------------
From: Kwan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 and ipfwadm
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 14:16:22 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Nevin wrote:
>
> I just installed RedHat 6 which does not have ipfwadm anymore.
> Apparently
> there is ipfwadm-wrapper and ipchains modules to do the same thing. Has
>
> anyone managed to configure the new modules to do what many of us do
> with
> ipfwadm.
> Any help appreciated.
www.freshmeat.net has a entry for a ipfwadm to ipchains converter
today. I have not tried it yet.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
