Linux-Networking Digest #225, Volume #11 Fri, 21 May 99 09:14:26 EDT
Contents:
Re: SAMBA Linux to Win98 prob! (Adam Rheaume)
Mail and RedHat 5.2 ("Peter van Gemert")
Re: Help with Telnet (Dave Webb)
Re: get client machine's IP-address (PennGwyn)
Re: Samba_2.0 NT4_SP3 and Linux SuSE6.1 (Mark McCoy)
Nameserver und masquerading firewall (Andreas Rieke)
Re: NFS service not responding ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Best Linux Networking Book (Kwan Lowe)
Re: PPP tantrums ("Ferdinand V. Mendoza")
Filters for text/postscript to JetDirect queue (Brian Vicente)
Turbo token-ring error (Mercedes Puzio)
Re: RH 5.2: local routing entry appears twice ("Curt")
Re: LINUX ability to handle large beowulf clusters (Peter Englmaier)
Re: Two network cards (Brian Vicente)
Re: RH 5.2: local routing entry appears twice (Georg Schwarz)
Re: kernel 2.2.9 and root on nfs (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
Re: ? loopback: ping `hostname` (Bernd Eckenfels)
ssh 1.2.26 + pam + shosts problem on RedHat 5.2 (Georg Schwarz)
Re: Diablo UDP packet problems behind IP Masquerading ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Multiple eth0 from route -n: Problem solved! (Jeffrey Bell)
rpc with linux and windows NT (Stephan Losa)
Re: How to use smbmount (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Adam Rheaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: SAMBA Linux to Win98 prob!
Date: 21 May 1999 10:48:19 GMT
This is happening because that domain is not a real domain name. You could try nameing
it linux.foo.com and all so add this to your hosts file. Then linux should be able to
resolv the name..
-=>Viper<=-
In alt.os.linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Machine #1 = 133Mhz cyrix w/Win98 (4gig +2gig & 64M mem)
: CDROM, IDE ZIP drive Floppy 56K WinModem (frown)
: Machine #2 = 133Mhz cyrix w/Linux (400M/Win95 + 600M w/Linux
: & 16 M mem) Linux boots from floppy, and win 95 drive is mtd
:
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: #2 LINUX config info:
: Network Configurator(Xwindows):
: NAME:
: Hostname = Monte.Linux
: Domain = (blank)
: search for hostnames in add'l domains = (blank)
: Nameservers= (blank)
: HOSTS:
: (blank)
: INTERFACES:
: Interface IP proto allboot active
: lo 127.0.0.1 none yes active
: eth0 200.1.1.1 none yes active
: ROUTING: NPF(IPv4)
: Default Gateway = 200.0.0.1
: Default Gateway Device = eth0
:
:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: #1 Win98 Network
: Identification - Computer name = Win98
: Workgroup = Workgroup
: Computer descr = Win98
: Access Control - Share-level access control
: Network Devices installed:
: Client for MS Networks options = logon and restore
: network connections
: Dialup Adapter (VPN support) modem internet works fine.
: LinkSys Ether16 LAN card options:
: driver type = enhanced mode NDIS driver
: Bindings = NETBUI & TCP/IP
: (Advanced & Current config options)= default
: TCP/IP Dialup (working)
: TCP/IP LinkSys Ether16 LAN options =
: IP address = 200.1.1.2
: subnet mask = 255.255.255.0 (default)
: WINS enabled search = 200.1.1.1
: Gateways = 200.1.1.1 (linux box)
: 204.52.135.1 (ISP)
: **note I had to add the ISP when I enabled WINS otherwise
: Win98 only searched the linux gate when I tried to go to differnt
: websites w/browser.**
: No Advanced selections
: File and Printer sharing for MS Networks
: ______________________________________________________
: Now sit down for this <G> #2(Win98) is peer to peered to the
: Win95 drive on #1 ( works fine )
: The Win98 & Linux can ping etc each other.
: I have installed FTP server & anon FTP on Linux box. I am able to
: log on from Win98 both as anonymous and as registered user
: w/password. I have done this with both windows internal ftp & with
: Cute FTP. I have successfully transferred (win98 -> Linux) and
: read files in both using the above configuration. Oh, and telnet
: works Win98 -> Linux
: I have installed Samba 2.0 etc(feb99) and smbd & nmpd both load
: on boot. When I run testparm I get the following:
: [root@Monte] /etc # testparm
: Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf
: Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host Monte.Linux
: Failed to get my hostname.
: I would like to enable Samba for full useage of file & printer sharing
: in both directions.
------------------------------
From: "Peter van Gemert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail and RedHat 5.2
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 22:51:43 GMT
Reply-To: "Peter van Gemert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello everyone,
I have a network with two PC's. Their configuration is:
PC1 PC2
Hostnname sys1 sys2
IP address 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.3
Subnet 255.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
OS RedHat 5.2 RedHat 5.2
I want users on both system to be able to send mail to the other system. So
users on sys1 should be able to send mail to users on sys2 and users on
sys2 should be able to send mail to users on sys1. I tried the
configuration in the RedHat manual but this didn't work.
Can anyone help??
Thanks in advance,
Peter
------------------------------
From: Dave Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with Telnet
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 12:01:08 +0100
Thanks Georg - I had the same problem and putting the entry in the /etc/hosts
file fixed it immediately
Dave
Georg Cantor wrote:
> Claude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:7hbc1q$but$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Greetings,
> > Its actually waiting for the reverse DNS to time out.
> >
> > Add a entry in the linux box's /etc/hosts file pointing to the Win98
> client.
> > Then the telnet connections should be instant.
> >
> > Claude
> >
>
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: get client machine's IP-address
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PennGwyn)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 May 1999 10:59:04 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>This program runs in the server but thru the pseudo-tty its output is
>displayed at the client machine.
Note that that machine isn't a client of your application -- it's a client of
the telnet daemon. Perhaps your application coulkd discover that through some
ioctl() call, but since the point of Telnet is to isolate your app from the
network connection details, perhaps not.
------------------------------
From: Mark McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba_2.0 NT4_SP3 and Linux SuSE6.1
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 19:14:17 -0500
Matt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just configured SuSE 6.1 with the updated
> samba.rpm. The NT box can see Linux and can logon
> to the Linux box using NT4 SP3 (using the active
> descktop).
>
> However when I attempt to copy a file to Linux
> from NT I get a permissions error. I have
> added full permissions to the user on NT.
>
> even with the option of
>
> security=share or security=user in the smb.conf
>
> If I attempt to change the permissions on NT
> just in case (to ckeck the permissions)
> I get an active desktop explorer error exception.
> The active desktop then reverts to the recovery
> desktop.
>
> I can copy files from Linux to the NT directory
> but not the other way (NT to Linux).
>
> Is there another problem in samba, or is there
> another setting in the smb.conf that I have
> missed ?
>
> Many thanks
>
> Matt
does the user have _Unix_ write permissions to the directory??
Even if Samba gives read/write permission to a SMB user, the user account on the
Linux box must have write access to the directory.
For example, if I export /usr/local/projects as a read/write share "proj" (in
smb.conf), and fictitious user "larryb" (in the fictitious group "programmers")
mounts that share, he can only write to the directory if the directory looks
like any of these (ls -ld /usr/local/projects):
drwxr-xr-x 3 larryb root .............. projects
drwxrwxr-x 3 root programmers ............. projects
drwxrwxrwx 3 root root ............. projects
(of course 777 permissions are dangerous, so no follow-ups explaining that
please)
larryb can not write there if the permissions look like this:
drwxr-xr-x 3 root othergroup ............. projects
since he is not in the group that owns the directory, even though samba tells NT
that this is a read/write share.
--
Mark McCoy -- Proud to run Linux since February 1996
Systems Administrator - Cajun Brothers Technology, llc
The views in this message do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer
This message posted from snowdog, a 100% MS-free machine.
------------------------------
From: Andreas Rieke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Nameserver und masquerading firewall
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 13:25:59 +0200
Hi,
after configuring a firewall with IP masquerading under Suse 6.0,
my nameserver is no longer running stable.
Even requests that have been answered correctly 5 minutes ago can
lead to the error message: "Default server not found" and vice versa.
About 50 % of the requests is answered correctly, and the server has
"good" times where it works and "bad" phases where nothing works.
With disabled firewall and masquerading, the nameserver works properly.
Has anyone had a similar problem? Does anyone have an idea what I can
do?
Thanks in advance,
Andreas Rieke
P. S.: All TCP and UDP ports are open, this is not the problem.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NFS service not responding
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 23:16:02 GMT
Where do I find the steps involved in replacing knfsd-1.2 with nfsd-2.2?
I am a real "newbie" at Linux.
Bill Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got similar results. It seems RedHat replaced nfsd-2.2 with
knfsd-1.2.
> While both programs showed Version 2 under rpcinfo it seems a version
3
> client cannot negotiate down to ver 2 with the knfsd problem.
>
> I have removed knfsd from my system and put back nfsd-2.2 and things
seem to
> be working again. I am still hunting down more info on both packages,
but
> am not having much sucess. If you learn anything, please pass it
along and
> I will do the same
>
> Bill
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just upgraded from RH5.2 to RH6.0. When trying to mount an exported
> > directory on Linux with a SunOS 5.6 machine I now get "NFS service
not
> > responding".
> >
> > ping works
> > host <hostname> works
> > host <ip_addr> works
> > telnet works
> > SAMBA now works with NT (Didn't have time to get it working on 5.2
> > before upgrading)
> >
> > The answer is probably right in front of me and I don't know it. I
only
> > have one month of intense Linux/UNIX experience, but I HAVE to get
some
> > work done.
> >
> > Thanks for any suggestions.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Kwan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best Linux Networking Book
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 23:01:17 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darren Greer wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> I am interested to find out what books Linux Network Administrators
> out there are using as references/guides to mainting a network using
> Linux. Things such as configuration, performance tuning, etc, are a
> key factor in what I am looking for. I read the review of "The Linux
> Network" in LJ, but it seems to be "streamlined" for slackware. I am
> using Debian, so any book(s) that anyone can point out, will be
> greatly appreciated. Thanks,
>
> Darren
I use _The Linux Network_ with both Debian and Redhat installs. It goes
into more detail as far as configuring the machine for Windows
interoperability, gateway services, etc.. Running Linux is also good,
but actual networking is a little limited (concentrates on
administration and setup). The online Network Administrators Guide and
System Admin Guide are also veru useful.
------------------------------
From: "Ferdinand V. Mendoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP tantrums
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 15:10:07 +0400
> Guys,
Thanks a lot for the advice. Problem solved!As what you have said
"noipdefault" was just
the medicine.
>
>
> Ferdinand
>
> ++++++++++++++++++
>
> See no Microsoft.
> Hear no Microsoft.
> Speak no Microsoft.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Vicente)
Subject: Filters for text/postscript to JetDirect queue
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 00:28:02 GMT
I'm trying to print directly to a JetDirect Card with automatic
routing to the proper queue based on type of file. For example send a
ps to printer and it goes to the 'raw' queue and a text wouldfile
would go to the 'text' queue on the JetDirect.
It there aren't any; where can I find info on how to construct one?
Thanks,
Brian Vicente
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 21:15:09 +0000
From: Mercedes Puzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Turbo token-ring error
I have an IBM Turbo Token Ring 16/4 in RedHat 5.2, and every 1 or 2
minutes I get:
tr0: Line errors 01, Internal errors 00, Burst errors 00
A/C errors 00, Abort delimiters 00, Lost frames 00
Receive congestion count 00, Frame copied errors 00
Frequency errors FF, Token errors 00
I tried to recompile the driver, but I'm getting some troubles. Does
anyone know what is this error about, and what should I do? Please,
answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 5.2: local routing entry appears twice
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 06:28:11 -0500
This seems to happen to many people. I've not seen it on any of my systems.
It shouldn't cause any problems. You might study the scripts in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts to determine where it is happening.
Georg Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7i337s$d7j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm using RedHat 5.2 with static IP routing. My routing table looks as
> follows:
>
> netstat -nr
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
> 130.149.160.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
> 130.149.160.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
> 0.0.0.0 130.149.160.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
>
> why does the LAN entry appear twice? Is this a known problem with that
> distribution?
> --
> Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP
2.6ui)
> Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
> Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: Peter Englmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: LINUX ability to handle large beowulf clusters
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 21:18:46 -0400
It's not that Linux is restricted. It is the PC's. I guess
the 'friend' was refering to the hardware of a baeowulf cluster which
is simply not the ultimate answer to supercomputing. Same true for
any clustered system. The kind of supercomputer that he had in mind
needs a fast memory backbone. And: all supercomputers use Unix
anyway, so why pushing Linux in? After all Linux is Unix. For
supercomputing there are specialised compilers, specialised Unixes,
and specialised memory architectures and they do not run X on it.
If you want to discuss this further: stay in c.o.l.advocacy where
this belongs to.
Brian Vicente wrote:
>
> What are the reasons for Linux not being able to support more than
> 300?
> I can't think of anything that has that limitation.
> Jon Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I was talking with a friend who is researching a supercomputer design
> >that may become one of the top 10 machines in the world. I mentioned
> >Beaowulf Linux clustering and the response was that Linux is good but
> >can't support more than about 300 nodes in a cluster (and they plan on
> >being larger than that). Is this true? If there IS a way around this
> >limitation I'd like to know so I can make further recommendations for
> >Linux to him.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Vicente)
Subject: Re: Two network cards
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 01:21:02 GMT
"Jim Scheffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have @Home cable modem service that I would like to share over my
>intranet. The problem that I am running into is that I have a two sided
>network (intra and internet) and I can only get one NIC to work. I am
>running Mandrake (5.2 w/KDE) Somebody told me that there is an RPM that I
>need to load to use dual NIC's. Any help would be appreciated.
>-Jim
I've done this with Redhat 5.2
You have to pass some parameters to the kernel on boot. You can do it
manually or in lilo( that's what I was using as boot loader).
image=yadayadad
label=linux
etc
etc
append=eth0,eth1,eth2
that append is what did it. And then yo probably need something in
/etc/aliases like:
eth0 name_of_network_driver_1_here
eth1 name_of_network_driver_2_here
I can send details to you or you can also check on the CESDIS site for
a howto.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz)
Subject: Re: RH 5.2: local routing entry appears twice
Date: 21 May 1999 11:48:06 GMT
"Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>This seems to happen to many people. I've not seen it on any of my systems.
>It shouldn't cause any problems. You might study the scripts in
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts to determine where it is happening.
maybe it's because I'm running 2.2.X [where X is <= 9 on different
machines with all the same phenomenon]?
--
Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP 2.6ui)
Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.9 and root on nfs
Date: 21 May 99 12:29:27 GMT
Andreas Jaehnigen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.. well didn't that setting required in /etc/exports..... and not
in kernel. ?
: Hi all,
: in the documentation of kernel 2.2.9 there is mentioned you should enable
: "root on nfs" if you want to have your root filesystem on NFS. (Sounds
: logical, hm?) ;-)
: I have enabled NFS support to be compiled into the kernel (no module), but there
: is NO option like "root on nfs" there.
: Has this option vanished recently?
: System is a Sun Sparcstation SLC (yes, Linux runs on a Sparc, really!) :-)
: Can someone give me a hint where this option resides???
: Thank you in advance for your answers. Would be nice if you could send a copy of
: your reply via mail also. Thanks!
: Andi
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/digital/298/ ( UnderConstruction )
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ? loopback: ping `hostname`
Date: 21 May 1999 00:56:32 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Ferdinand V. Mendoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 127.0.0.1 localhost loopback
>> 172.16.1.1 slackbox
Eighetr add slackbox to the 127.0.0.1 line as the first entry or you add an
dummy interface (modprobe dummy ; ifconfig dummy slackbox up ; route add
-host slackbox dev dummy)
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh
Subject: ssh 1.2.26 + pam + shosts problem on RedHat 5.2
Date: 21 May 1999 12:26:51 GMT
I'm running RedHat 5.2 with the ssh 1.2.26 rpm from ftp.replay.com. When I
log into the machine as root with the originating account being listed in
~root/.shosts (no .rhosts or /etc/hosts.equiv file exists) I get (verbose
output from the ssh client):
...
lorenz: Remote: Accepted by .shosts.
lorenz: Received RSA challenge for host key from server. lorenz: Sending
response to host key RSA challenge.
lorenz: Remote: Rhosts with RSA host authentication accepted.
lorenz: Rhosts or /etc/hosts.equiv with RSA host authentication accepted
by server.
lorenz: Requesting pty.
...
why does it talk of "Rhosts or /etc/hosts.equiv with RSA host
authentication accepted"? Is it PAM saying so?
when terminating the shell opened via ssh (or when the command started by
ssh terminates) the syslog on the destination machine (RH5.2) says:
May 21 14:12:32 poseidon sshd[2675]: log: Closing connection to
130.149.161.54
May 21 14:12:32 poseidon PAM_pwdb[2675]: 1 authentication failure; (uid=0)
-> root for ssh service
why that last line? It BTW causes output from a command executed by ssh to
be suppressed (but still that command gets executed on the target
machine). This also happens when the destination account is not root:
May 21 14:23:05 poseidon PAM_pwdb[2776]: 1 authentication failure; (uid=0)
-> schwarz for ssh service
It does however not occur when using password authentification.
What's at fault here? PAM maybe?
--
Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP 2.6ui)
Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Diablo UDP packet problems behind IP Masquerading
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 11:52:37 GMT
"Robert Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've asked this question several times myself, but I did read on an
>ipmasq web-site the following:
>
> Quake I or II
> Works right out of the box but requires the ip_masq_quake module if
>there are more than one Quake I/II player behind a MASQ box. Also, this
>module only supports Quake I and QuakeWorld by default. If you need to
>support Quake II or non-default server ports, please see the module
>install section of the rc.firewall-2.0.x and rc.firewall-2.2.x
>rulesets.
Have the same problem with Quake II.
Where i can get this documentation (module install section of the
rc.firewall-2.0.x rulesets) ?
Thanks.
Andrew.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple eth0 from route -n: Problem solved!
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 14:25:38 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffrey Bell wrote:
> I have two machines networked together. I ran route -n command and noticed on one
>machine
>
> the following:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 206.115.158.44 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 206.115.158.44 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
>
I have corrected this problem, seems like I didn't read the
/linux/Documentation/Changes
file. It was pointed out be another.
The newer kernel 2.2.x does a auto route (?), my /etc/rc.d/rc.eth0 script was not up to
date. I edited (removed) the /usr/sbin route add -net $NETWORK netmask eth0 from this
script
and rebooted and this corrected the problem. Now I have only one 192.168.1.0 (eth0)
entree
in the routing table.
Thanks.
--
Jeffrey A. Bell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
-- Wernher von Braun --
------------------------------
From: Stephan Losa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rpc with linux and windows NT
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 00:18:56 +0200
Hi,
i'd like to know if it's possible to have an rpc server on windows Nt
and a client on linux.
i made a server which runs on windows NT
but when i try to connect to the server i obtain from linux "connection
refused"
the same thing occurs when i run rpcinfo -p machine NT
if you have any idea or some examples.
Thans for answers
stephan losa
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to use smbmount
Date: 21 May 99 12:37:11 GMT
Piotr Lukasz Bychowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
______________ Hear -----------
Its depend on your samba version your using... if version 2.2.**** thats
latest version: You need to become root to mount.. suid something that
I don't know yet... anyone pls inform me what is it.
here how u mount with new version of samba
smbmount //pcname/sharename -U yourid
smbmnt>mount /local/mount/point -g groupid -u userid
done... mounting don't in smbmnt console prompt
old version samba:
smbmount //pcname/sharename /local/mount/point -U username -I ipaddress
Is this clear.. and work.. well I will be including some of this in
my homepage.. so hold on. I had the same problem with samba went I upgrade
kernel so.. I know how you felt..
: On Tue, 18 May 1999, Takashi Masuda wrote:
:> I want to mount a Windows shared folder to a Linux mount point.
:> I have setup smb.conf. Linux directries can be accessed from Windows boxes.
:> I tried following commands.
:> smbmount \\\\(NetBIOS Name)\\(Shared Folder) (Linux mount-point)
:> smbmount \\(NetBIOS Name)\(Shared Folder) (Linux mount-point)
:> smbmount //(NetBIOS Name)/(Shared Folder) (Linux mount-point)
:> smbmount /(NetBIOS Name)/(Shared Folder) (Linux mount-point)
: Perhaps You should try
: smbmount ////(NetBIOS Name)//(Shared Folder) (Linux mount-point)
: ;-))
: But seriously, have You tried to display resources by command
: smbclient -L (NetBIOSName)
: to check if Your linux can really see it?
: And what about the system You are using? Because I've tried those upper on
: Red Hat 5.1 (5.2) and it works. On RH 6.0 You have to enter
: smbmount ////(NetBIOS Name)//(Shared Folder) -c 'mount mount-point'
: And the most important: read the manual (of course if you haven't done it
: already)
:> But those were all failed. What should I do?
:> Thanks in advance.
:>
:> Takashi Masuda
:> K.K.Rocky Japan
:>
:>
:>
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/digital/298/ ( UnderConstruction )
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
