Linux-Networking Digest #258, Volume #11 Sun, 23 May 99 22:13:40 EDT
Contents:
SMTP betwen two servers and ipfwadm+squid ("dss")
Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL ("W.A. Scheer")
newbie DHCP??? (Derek)
Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes (Kris)
Re: Error ipchains (Zenon Fortuna)
Re: @home and 10Base-T--anyone using this combo with linux? (Zenon Fortuna)
Serial Port - Dial In ("Carl Filpo")
Re: My Modem Cablemodem has got a Hangup. Might just be the pppd... (Zenon Fortuna)
Re: -=what can you do with 2 pcs?=- ("Gregory T. Helding")
IP-MASQUERADE results in permanent dialin (Andreas Hennig)
Help for sample gated (OSPF) configuration ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Slow PPP connection with RH 6.0 ("Stephen J. MacLellan")
Samba and Win98 passworkd problem (Luis Lebron)
Re: What are good 100baseTX cards for RH 5.2 ("Jason A. Wallwork")
Intel Etherexpress Pro 10+/eepro (joyce grace)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "dss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: SMTP betwen two servers and ipfwadm+squid
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 20:30:05 -0300
- All,
- I have the following case to solve:
------internet
------dmz=server1_with_sendmail (gateway sendmail)
------firewall=server2_with_ipfwadm_and_squid
------intranet=server3_with_sendmail (relay mail)
I can't send my messages from server3 to server 1 using ipfwadm !
- How is the best way to solve this with security ?
- Can I use ipfwadm or I need something more ?
- Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:02:39 -0700
From: "W.A. Scheer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: STAROFFICE INSTALL
Hmmm ... and SO '3.1' - there's a 3.1?
Seriously, Tony - I'm hoping this is a typo! If not puleeeez gor to
www.stardivision.com and get the latest binary package. It also looks like you
should use a Linux distribution with RPM (I suggest RedHat Linux 6.0) if you
don't want to have to trace down these kind of dependencies. I'm lazy as hell
when it comes to that kind of stuff myself, which is why I use RHL.
BTW ~ StarOffice 5.0 comes with RHL 6.0 and is working just peachy for me so far
... I use my Win98 machine less and less ...
W.A. Scheer
John Oliver wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 1999 21:26:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony
> DiChiacchio) wrote:
>
> >I'M TRYING TO INSTALL STAROFFICE 3.1 - WHEN I TRY TO RUN THE SETUP PROGRAM I
> >GET ERROR "CAN'T LOAD LIBRARY 'LIBXM.SO.2'
> . I'M NEW TO LINUX AND
> >COULD USE SOME HELP. THANKS.
>
> Your CapsLock key is broken. Time for a new keyboard...
------------------------------
From: Derek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: newbie DHCP???
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 19:46:28 -0400
I am using SuSe Linux 6.1 and just switched over from RH5.1 to this and
now I cannot seem to find a config tool to setup my computer for a DHCP
server. It asked me in setup for my hostname and domain name and I just
put something in but never gave me an option for DHCP access. Does
anyone know something about the Suse OS? or any other ideas please.
thanks in advance
Derek
--
Add your Homepage Link!
Cut and Paste JavaScripts and MSIE scripts.
HTTP://www.ghitar1.com
Don't forget to sign the Guestbook!
Derek (Webmaster) {AOL I.M. ~ghitar1}
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kris)
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.x: PPP freezes
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 13:41:44 GMT
Hi Clifford Kite,
>Moreover you've done something that I didn't realize was possible, you
>caused pppd to reject the "asyncmap" requested by the peer. On reviewing
>man pppd for ppp-2.3.8 it seems that the pppd default-asyncmap option
>must have been used to do that. I don't know what possible reason one
>could have to configure for this, although I'll certainly admit there
>might be one. But not likely in any ordinary ISP connection.
Nope - I don't have default-asyncmap anywhere in my PPP options files
(/etc/ppp/options & /etc/ppp/peers/provider, I believe). I have also
tried various other things, but I just get lots of asyncmap things (I'm
not very technical with PPP) when I choose PAP authentication:
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x50 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x50 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x51 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x51 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x2894470d> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x6 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb1878299> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xb1878299]
>sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x6 user="dufas" password="mypasswordhere"]
(quoted there's no word wrapping... Agent's fault)
All of that's then repeated lots of times (apparently indefinitely).
With normal chatscript authentication, I get things like:
>Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x20 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x20 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x21 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x21 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xc7898b3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xac3d9a48> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xac3d9a48]
>sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
>rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0xc7898b3]
>rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr 195.147.132.201>]
>sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr 195.147.132.201> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
>rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr 195.147.132.201> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
>rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xeb <compress VJ 0f 00> <addr 195.147.128.4>]
>sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0xeb <compress VJ 0f 00> <addr 195.147.128.4>]
>local IP address 195.147.132.201
>remote IP address 195.147.128.4
... followed by no packets going anywhere.
>You also have noccp as a pppd option.
Nope. I must've had PPP compiled into the kernel at that time (CCP
compressors apparently only work as a module). Note that modules make no
difference to anything.
>The most notable things missing in the log are messages showing that you
>authenticated yourself to the ISP using PAP or CHAP, messages not likely
>to be entirely removed simply because of the pppd hide-password option.
>Unless you do a chat scripted login/password then the ISP must have
>been sorely perplexed, but not so much as to let you pass any traffic
>through it.
Chat scripts, PAP, CHAP, nothing changes -- either I eventually get an
IP and can't do anything while connected, or it just appears to loop (as
in my first ppp.log output above).
>If you do do a chat login/password, or simply cut out the authentication
>messages, then there's not much else to say except that there were some
>unusual options, the default-asyncmap option being particularly notable.
Again, default-asyncmap isn't anywhere in my config files. If I knew how
to grep every file on my system for it then I would (manpages are so
cryptic sometimes).
If posting my entire ppp.log file (or putting it on my web space) would
be of use, then I'll do that.
Thanks for the detailed observations, btw. Much appreciated.
Bye,
Kris
--
Kris
ICQ 10537480
[EMAIL PROTECTED] checked weekly(ish)
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for quicker response (+.co.uk)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zenon Fortuna)
Subject: Re: Error ipchains
Date: 23 May 1999 17:23:44 -0700
Seems like the suse 61 is using the ipchains in their firewall activity.
It is the new trend, so don't blame them for the change.
The great introduction to the "ipchains" is at
http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/usr/doc/HOWTO/other-formats/html/IPCHAINS-HOWTO.html
You have to make your kernel be aware of the ipchains. For the 2.0.34+ kernels
you have to install a proper kernel patch and activate the options:
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL_CHAINS=y
Then your kernel can talk to the ipchains protocol.
-Z
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthias Kihr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After update (suse 6.0 to 61) I have the following Error in the startup
>script for the masquerading:
>
>ipchains - Protocol unavailable
>
>Alle masq. modules are loaded and forwarding is aktivated.
>
>Who can help???
>
>Matthias
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zenon Fortuna)
Subject: Re: @home and 10Base-T--anyone using this combo with linux?
Date: 23 May 1999 17:38:35 -0700
I am running two Debian/2.0.35 Linux systems, connected via a hub
to the tci@home (so, it my be not exactly what you may get at rogers@home).
One has an ISA nic card HP27247, and another has a PCI J2585B (also HP).
Both work without ANY problems -- so I would give them a maximal score.
Before the HP27247 I had the 3c509B card: this one worked great under NT
not not at all under Linux. Some people have this card working fine on their
systems, but reading the News discussions I would conclude that there are
serious problems with this card support.
-z
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was wondering if people could indicate the NIC
>they are using with rogers@home (canada) under linux
>and what version of the kernel they're using. A rating
>of how well the card works would be appreciated.
>
>
>
>===============================================
>
>Walter Tautz
>Department of Combinatorics & Optimization
>Faculty of Mathematics
>University of Waterloo
>Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
------------------------------
From: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Serial Port - Dial In
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 08:51:23 +0800
Trying to setup a serial port for dial-in access using Debian 2.1
How do I change the devices ttySx to "dialin" as opposed to the default
"dialout" ?
--
Carl Filpo
Computer Network Consultant
=================================================
Carl Filpo BSc(Curtin)
Computer Network Consultant
C&M Computer Solutions
26 Russell St
MORLEY WA 6062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 08 9375 1144
Fax: +61 08 9375 1141
Mobile: 0407 396 316
=================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zenon Fortuna)
Subject: Re: My Modem Cablemodem has got a Hangup. Might just be the pppd...
Date: 23 May 1999 17:46:21 -0700
I am very confused here: you have a Cablemodem connections but are
trying to use the ppp protocol to communicate ?
The Cablemodem provides the Ethernet-like interface, so you do not need
the ppp0 only the eth0 protocols.
Another confusion: you say that the "3com 3c900B modem seems to be recognized".
The 3c90xB is an Ethernet card and not a modem. You are supposed to connect
this card to your cable modem, configure your network (IP address, routing
etc) and use your eth0 interface to communicate (with ftp, telnet, http, etc).
BTW, your IP address on the eth0 interface, 10.0.0.1, cannot be right
to communicate via the cable modem.
-z
In article <7i9v2n$rrm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am running Slackware. To be precise:
>Linux meforce 2.0.35 #57 Tue Oct 13 23:02:53 CDT 1998 i686 unknown
>
>
>Problem: What's the Hangup with my pppd daemon dameon? Help.
>
>What I gather is the HW works perfectly but I'm setting the wrong "I
>don't have a clue whatevers!". The pppd daemon dies suddenly. It dies
>damn good too. I'm tired of its deathly ;-) demonstration. Help.
>
>I've tried many permutations of my userid/password combinations. All
>valid I might ;-) add. Valid in the sense that the properly formatted
>combinations somehow "exist" because it's paid for. That kind of
>valid. The Format of whether I am supposed to use "expressnet" or
>"ex-pressnet" or "Nothing At All" in userid combination has caused
>considerable mindless frustration.
>
>Therefore, I also haven't actually elimated the possiblity that my
>typing is so misinputed by These Tired User's Hands...
>
>Still, I reckon it's not due to bad typing at the userid/password
>typing level that is the source of my pppd daemon troubles. What else
>could it be? The 3com 3c900B modem seems to be recognized fine for
>here is the dmesg line at startup
>
>53:eth0: 3Com 3c900 at 0xf880, 00:10:5a:a4:0a:f1, IRQ 11
>
>and the module 3c59x is uploaded via the /etc/rc.d/* files.
>
>Per the excellent instructions, needing minor grammatical corrections,
>given on
>http://metalab.unc.edu/linux/HOWTO/mini/Cable-Modem-4.html#ss4.3
>here's my consequent ifconfig output:
>
>meforce:~# ifconfig
>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> Collisions:0
>
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:A4:0A:F1
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.15 Mask:255.255.255.240
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:4894 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> Collisions:0
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0xf880
>
>ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:153.35.88.44 P-t-P:206.115.156.4 Mask:255.255.0.0
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1524 Metric:1
> RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> Collisions:0
> Memory:2ba6038-2ba6c34
>
>
>My last /var/log/ppp contents follow:
>
>May 23 15:18:42 meforce pppd[629]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: timeout set to 3 seconds
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (rAT^M)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (OK)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: rAT^M^M
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: OK -- got it
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (ATH0^M)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: timeout set to 30 seconds
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (OK)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ^M
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ATH0^M^M
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: OK -- got it
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: send (ATDT1301#######^M)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: expect (CONNECT)
>May 23 15:18:43 meforce chat[630]: ^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ATDT1301#######^M^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: CONNECT -- got it
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: send (^M)
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: expect (Username:)
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: 57600^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: User Access Verification^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: ^M
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: Username: -- got it
>May 23 15:19:03 meforce chat[630]: send (YourUsernameGoesHere^M)
>May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: expect (Password:)
>May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: YourUsernameGoesHere^M
>May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: Password: -- got it
>May 23 15:19:04 meforce chat[630]: send (YourUserPasswordGoesHere^M)
>May 23 15:19:04 meforce pppd[629]: Serial connection established.
>May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: Using interface ppp0
>May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
>May 23 15:19:05 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
>0x0> <magic 0x49957748> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce last message repeated 2 times
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8a <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8a <auth pap>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
>0x0> <magic 0x49957748> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8b <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8b <auth chap
>05>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8c <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8c <auth pap>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8d <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:11 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8d <auth chap
>05>]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8e <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8e <auth pap>]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x8f]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x8f]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x90 <asyncmap
>0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x61c24812> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x90 <auth chap
>05>]
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Modem hangup
>May 23 15:19:12 meforce pppd[629]: Connection terminatEd.
>May 23 15:19:13 meforce pppd[629]: Exit.
>
>Have I explained my dilemma clearly and specifically enough? TIA for all
>feedback.
>
>The Modem Cablemodem combo works perfectly fine under my Win95 OS.
>This and other tests verify that my HW is operational.
>
>
>
>--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
>---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "Gregory T. Helding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: -=what can you do with 2 pcs?=-
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 08:46:27 -0500
Hmmm. I see the beginnings of a Linux cluster...
http://www.beowulf.org/
-G
jane chav wrote:
>
> hi, got 2 pcs and 2 SMC NICs, want to make the most out of them, so
> please feel free to add to the list, cheers
>
> 1. IP Masq
> 2. File/printer sharing
> 3. playing games
> 4. one for work, one for experimenting
> 5. look good :)
> 6.
> 7.
> 8.
> 9.
> 10.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Andreas Hennig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP-MASQUERADE results in permanent dialin
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 03:12:02 +0200
We have a 3-box local network. One computer acts as local file and
print Linux-server and is connected to the Internet via ISDN. Squid is
running on the server. HTTP and FTP from the Non-Sever-boxes (running
WIN95 and/or Linux)
is going fine via Netscape and squid, but POP3-accounts are
unaccessible.
So we have tried to enable internet-access through IP-Masquerading,
following the
steps in the IP-Masquerading-HOWTO (the server is running Suse-Linux 6.1
with
a 2.2.5 kernel). After a little bit of trial and error, everything is
running as expected,
but the server is trying to dial in now nearly every minute, which is
not that fortunate
for our telephone-bill (where every call charges at least 0,12DM).
Some futile attempts so far:
- shutting down Samba
- shutting down sendmail
Anybody with any ideas?
Here's some data about our setup:
Linux-Server: IF-Config Output
dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255
Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1235 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:E1:28:B5
inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:7872 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7386 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6000
ippp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:192.168.0.99 P-t-P:192.168.0.1
Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1572 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1556 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:30
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:1188 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1188 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
IP-Masquerade-Setup:
Chain forward (policy DENY):
target prot opt source destination
ports
MASQ all ------ Enterprise/24 anywhere n/a
where Enterprise is our local network 192.168.0.0.
Routing (offline):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.0.10 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 0
dummy0
192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ippp0
192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ippp0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
ippp0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.10 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
dummy0
Routing (online):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.0.10 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 0
dummy0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
134.91.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0
ippp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 134.91.19.50 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
ippp0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.10 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
dummy0
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Andreas Hennig
Kersten Chalupka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help for sample gated (OSPF) configuration
Date: 23 May 1999 20:51:26 -0400
Hello:
I need a sample configuration file for gated. I would like to use only OSPF
protocol. I have already checked www.gated.org and did not find sample
configuration file .
If you send me sample configuration, I will really appreciate.
is there any documentation for gated other than www.gated.org?
Thanks.
Mike
------------------------------
From: "Stephen J. MacLellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: netcom.netcruiser.tech
Subject: Re: Slow PPP connection with RH 6.0
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 21:30:23 -0700
Eric/Rand,
I've just spent six hours doing the same thing, except I've tried both gnome and
netcfg, with a different problem. I manage to connect (quickly), get the
various message (by watching tail -f /var/log/messages), and watch the modem
hang-up about 10 seconds after the "Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0" message.
Very frustrating.
I use RH 5.2 and 6.0 extensively in the office for Ethernet Internet access via
a Firewall proxy server with no issues. The PC I'm using is a standalone one
for home development.
Any advice would be welcome. I'll watch to see who responds to your notes.
Steve
Eric Bryant wrote:
> I've got the same problem with RH 6.0. It was also just as slow using RH
> 5.2. I also tried the mtu 750, /sbin/hdparm -u 1 /dev/hda to no avail. And I
> am also using Netcom, and using a dual-boot Linux/Windows 98, it is much
> faster in Windows 98. I use kppp and xisp to dial out. Please tell me if you
> discover anything else about this problem.
> Thanks!
> Eric
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rand Simberg wrote:
>
> > I'm running the Red Hat 6.0 version of Linux and whatever pppd comes
> > with it, trying to establish my PPP connection to Netcom. I copied
> > the files off the page at the Netcom site, and modified them as
> > appropriate, but I get very slow connections (never faster than two or
> > three hundred bytes per second using Netscape). (I added the mtu 296
> > to the options file at the suggestion of someone in
> > comp.os.linux.setup, which improved it somewhat, but not to an
> > acceptable level). I'm using the Redondo Beach POP with a 33K modem.
> > I know the phone line and POP are good, because I can get a good 48K
> > connection with my Win98/56K setup. Does anyone have any experience
> > with Linux and Netcom that can provide any guidance as to what I
> > should be tweaking to given me a usable connection?
> >
> > Here are the relevant files...
> >
> > ppp-on script
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
> > /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/cua2 38400 \
> > connect "/usr/sbin/chat -f /etc/ppp/chat-netcom" \
> > defaultroute modem crtscts lock
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> > chat-netcom script
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> > ABORT BUSY
> > ABORT 'NO CARRIER'
> > '' ATZ
> > OK AT+FCLASS=0
> > OK AT&F&C1&D2
> > OK ATDT13108960011
> > CONNECT ''
> > login: us,ppp,simberg
> > Password: ************
> > 'PPP session' ''
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> > options file
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> > domain ix.netcom.com
> > ipcp-accept-local
> > ipcp-accept-remote
> > mtu 296
> > noipdefault
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> > ppp-off script
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
> > DEVICE=ppp0
> >
> > #
> > # If the ppp0 pid file is present then the program is running. Stop
> > it.
> > if [ -r /var/run/$DEVICE.pid ]; then
> > kill -INT `cat /var/run/$DEVICE.pid`
> > #
> > # If unsuccessful, ensure that the pid file is removed.
> > #
> > if [ ! "$?" = "0" ]; then
> > echo "removing stale $DEVICE pid file."
> > rm -f /var/run/$DEVICE.pid
> > exit 1
> > fi
> > #
> > # Success. Terminate with proper status.
> > #
> > echo "$DEVICE link terminated"
> > exit 0
> > fi
> > #
> > # The link is not active
> > #
> > echo "$DEVICE link is not active"
> > exit 1
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> > Can anyone see what the problem might be?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > ************************************************************************
> > simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole)
> > interglobal space lines * 307 733-1391 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org
> >
> > "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..."
> > Replace first . with @ and throw out the "@trash." to email me.
> > Here's my email address for autospammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis Lebron)
Subject: Samba and Win98 passworkd problem
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 19:41:23 -0500
I finally got the Samba server working and now I can access the Win
machines from the Linux box and the Linux box from the windows machines.
Public directories are accessible from the Win98 machines.
My only problem is when I try to access the home directories. Windows
will ask for a password and when I type it in it complains. I tried the
encrypted password option in Samba and later the plain text password fix
in Win98, but neither one of the worked. Any ideas?
--
Luis R. Lebron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 01:34:40 +0000
From: "Jason A. Wallwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: What are good 100baseTX cards for RH 5.2
John Hovell wrote:
>
> However, for the short answer, obviously the 3Com 3c90x group is really
Except the 3Com 3C501, about which the Linux Hardware Compatibility
HOWTO says "avoid like the plague"! :)
--
Jason A. Wallwork | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.bigfoot.com/~jsheridan
ICQ#: 1342805
------------------------------
From: joyce grace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intel Etherexpress Pro 10+/eepro
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 21:43:05 -0400
I just did a clean install of Redhat 6.0 on a Pentium 90.
For some reason, my Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ (ISA) network card isn't
being detected.
I also tried adding an append ="ether=11,0x230,0,0,eth0" to lilo.conf
and ran lilo.
I also tried recompiling the kernel w/ eepro compiled in (not as a
module).
The IRQ and the IO port are free.
ifconfig doesn't show eth0 and doing an
ifconfig -add for the card locks up the machine.
Any suggestions?
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
