Linux-Networking Digest #258, Volume #12 Tue, 17 Aug 99 14:13:29 EDT
Contents:
Re: nfs mount failed: permission denied, Solaris/Linux NFS problems (Johannes
Ziegler)
Re: Kernel compiling (Johannes Ziegler)
Re: Multi homed Linux as router between MS domains ("Nuno Jonet")
Re: 2 computer network
Re: NIS netgroups, and NFS (Johannes Ziegler)
Map server TCP port in a internal machine (Mario Prado)
Re: Cable Modems (Andy Johnstone)
isdn4linux under RedHat 6.0 (Nick Birkett)
Celebris can't see outside world via ethernet ("L. Mark Pilant")
Re: Transparent firewall - any such thing? (Andy Johnstone)
USR Speedster ISDN Problems (continuing) (Jerry Craker)
2 Gateways over 2 separate devices (Paul Cook)
NIS+ and RedHat 6.0 (Alexander Bulanov)
Re: Odd?: sshd(2) accepts ssh1 but not ssh2 connects (Andy Johnstone)
Partial: sshd(2) accepts ssh1 but not ssh2 connects (Kyle Ferrio)
eepro100 - Transmit timed out ("Hanno Stockhausen")
Re: kppp/pppd not working with /dev/modem (Neoklis)
IPMAQSADM and Apache problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IPMAQSADM and Apache problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Samba - newbie (Chris Mahmood)
Re: Newbie and Ethernet Card (Chris Mahmood)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:59:40 +0200
From: Johannes Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nfs mount failed: permission denied, Solaris/Linux NFS problems
lorax wrote:
> Wayne Ringling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : I have been trying to install RH6.0 the same way and am having no luck at
> : all. And if has baffled all my friends (not lick we are gurus, but I can
> : hold my own).
>
> : I have noticed that my install does not put the showmount command on the
> : system. I am still tryignto resolve this problem too.
>
> : Bruce Best wrote:
>
> :> I am trying to set up Linux Mandrake 6.0 on my laptop from the CDROM on
> :> my desktop via a PLIP link, using the Mandrake 6.0 (RedHad 6.0) network
> :> install. I get the message
> :>
> :> nfs mount failed: permission denied
> :>
> :> when the setup tries to access the cdrom.
> :>
> :> The desktop is 192.168.0.1; the notebook is 192.168.0.2.
> :>
> :> The /etc/exports file on the desktop includes the line
> :>
> :> /mnt/cdrom 192.168.0.2
> :>
> :> I am using Linux Mandrake 6.0 (kernel 2.2.9).
> :>
> :> Someone else kindly informed me that (s)he had had the same problem, and
> :> that it was solved by upgrading to kernel 2.2.10. Does anyone know if
> :> there is an easier fix for this problem, short of mucking about with a
> :> new kernel (which I don't really feel up to at the moment).
> :>
> :> Thanks,
> :>
> :> Bruce
>
> are you sure you are using the proper syntax for the mount command?
> mount 192.168.0.2:/mnt/cdrom /whateverlocaldirectory/youwant/
In our department we had the same problem with RH6, but we finally fixed it.
Here�s our suggestion:
1) get the kernel source for a kernel in [2.2.7, 2.2.10] (see 5)
2) install it in /usr/src
3) get the source for the newest knfsd-package
(ftp://ftp.varesearch.com/pub/support/hjl/knfsd/)
4) install it in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
5) apply the patches provided from the new knfsd-package as described
in one of the README�s
(that�s why you should notice 1, should work automatically with
those kernels)
6) compile the kernel with support for the kernel-nfs (still
experimental option)
7) compile the knfsd-sources, and make install (forget about their
warning not to use "make install")
(then you have a new rpc.mountd ........and a showmount program)
8) edit nfs-script in /etc/rc.d/init.d
define: RPCMOUNTD_OPTS="--no-nfs-version 3"
and add it to the call of the rpc.mountd in the start section of
the script => RPC.MOUNTD $RPCMOUNTD_OPTS
9) reboot your engine (maybe nfs restart is enough)
10) then it should work (also with Solaris requests)
11) keep track of new knfsd-features like support for NFS3, NIS-groups
etc.
(http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~gam3/knfsd/)
Good luck
Johannes Ziegler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(comments, questions: Welcome!)
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:54:19 +0200
From: Johannes Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Kernel compiling
Frederik Likaj wrote:
> I have just figured out ( i believed) how to get my RealTek8019 working.I
> went throw /usr/src/linux 1-make dep,make clean,make bzImage,make modules
> and make modules_install.Before that i had my ppp running and i could
> connect to internet on my RedHat 6.0.After i run make bzImage I just copy
> it to my floppy disc wich i use to boot into linux.It seems that eth0 work
> and i can ping around but i have lost my ppp conection.When i try to
> connect the modem don't react and it hangs on the yellow light.I believe
> that i have not done 100% right with the kernel compiling.What should i do?
> I use a floppy disc to boot linux.
> 2-Another problem is that i have another P.C. running linux RedHat 6.0 with
> the same netcard RealTek8019 but when i tried to compile the kernel i got
> the message
> make[1]:gcc:command not found
> make[1]:***[tkparse]Error 127
> make!***[xconfig]Error 2
> is any rpm i am missing there?
> Any help is welkomed.
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
1) try to figure out, whether the gcc-package is installed on your machine
rpm -qa | grep gcc
2) it seems that gcc-packages are not shiped with RH6,
you can find them on the RH6-mirrors under "contrib"
3) try making a "real" boot disk for linux,
under RH6: mkbootdisk --device <floppy device> <kernel-version>
e.g.: mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.7
Good luck!
Johannes Ziegler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Nuno Jonet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multi homed Linux as router between MS domains
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:19:59 +0100
No, I'm not using WINS name resolution.
In fact, for the time being the netowork is small enough to use LMHOSTS...
Any more help is more than welcome, Andrei.
Thanks
Nuno
Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7p9pjq$aa4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do you use WINS on your network?
>
>
> Nuno Jonet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi all
> >
> > My company has two subnets, 192.168.20.0 and 192.168.10.0 .
> > Each of them is a Win NT domain. Both servers at each segment are
> multihomed
> > and are serving as gateways. Because of the way MS networking works,
each
> > subnet can't see the other, only the other subnet's server, and even
then
> > it's really slow.
> >
> > For this reason, I thought of putting Red Hat Linux 5.2 with 2 NICs to
> serve
> > as a router between the segments.
> > All went well, except for when I tried to browse the network. Although I
> can
> > ping both subnets from the Linux box, and ping any host from any other
> > subnet from any machine, the MS browsing thing isn't happenning. Now I
> > can't see any machine across subnets...
> >
> > Since ping is working, I suppose the gateways were correctly configured.
> > It almost feels like the Netbios packet is being striped when it passes
> > through the Linux box.
> >
> > Am I missing something ???
> > Samba was automatically installed. Could it interfere ?
> >
> > Any help is most welcome !!!
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Nuno
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: 2 computer network
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:03:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:31:19 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am trying to hook 2 computers up in a network using cat5 cable and
>network cards. I am not using a network hub. Could someone please tell
>me which two wires on the network cable I need to cross.
Important pins:
1 <-> 3
2 <-> 6
More detail at http://www.netcomsystems.com/app_note/app002.htm
R. Marc
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:31:03 +0200
From: Johannes Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIS netgroups, and NFS
Britt wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get NIS netgroups to work under RH 6.0 for use
> with the NFS exports file?
>
> I'm simply unable to get them to work, my NIS server is the same RH 6.0
> box I'm using as an NFS server. I've never had a problem with similar
> setups under DU, or Solaris.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> B
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Britt Bolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] britt.bolen.com
We have the same problem as well.
We discovered:
If you are using the kernel-nfsd (knfsd) (RH6�s default) , it seems
that knfsd doesn�t support NIS groups in
the exports file yet. In version 1.4.6 it�s still in the TODO list
(and it definitely doesn�t work).
Keep track of the newest version
(http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~gam3/knfsd/).
Good luck.
Johannes Ziegler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Mario Prado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Map server TCP port in a internal machine
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:42:59 -0300
Dear Friends
In my net i have one linux machine that use masquerading to act as
proxy/gateway server.
I want to map the TCP port 90 of this machine to a internal machine. I
want to run one web-server in a NT machine ... so the result that i
expect is that :
http://myserver:90 requests be forwarded to http://192.168.1.10:90 (one
internal machine).
I will appreciate if someone colud help or point the documentation
that i need to read.
Thanks in advance for any help and sorry for my bad english.
Mario Prado - Brazil
------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cable Modems
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:17:54 -0400
Check out http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/Cable-Modem.html
This should get you started, as well as point you to a linux client (assuming
linux will be the one connected to the cable modem). Don't forget to tighten
your security.
andy
Chad Zalkin wrote:
> Hi, I am looking into getting a cable modem. Before I call my cable
> provider, I'd like to be sure I can use this in Linux. (And I'm guessing the
> provider will be of no help if I don't know what to ask them).
>
> Does anyone have this set up? Should I get a certain type of modem? What
> questions should I ask the provider to be sure it will work under Linux and
> Win98? How can I figure out if my existing network card works under Linux.
> (I've never used it in anything under linux).
>
> I'm running Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 on a Compaq Presario (PIII)
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Chad Zalkin
------------------------------
From: Nick Birkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: isdn4linux under RedHat 6.0
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:12:42 +0100
I am having problems compiling the isdn4linux software under RedHat 6.0
I am using the isdn4k-utils-3.0beta2 from the 2.1 directory on
ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/isdn4linux/v2.1/
I am running kernel 2.2.10 with isdn support.
Here is what I get when doing make config;make
gcc -g -Wall -pipe -DLIBAREA -DAVON=\"avon\"
-I/users/nrcb/incoming/isdn4k-utils-3.0beta2 -c -o isdntools.o
isdntools.c
In file included from libisdn.h:64,
from isdntools.c:187:
avon/createDB.h:37: ndbm.h: No such file or directory
In file included from libisdn.h:64,
from isdntools.c:187:
I tried copying ndbm.h from RedHat 5.2 and get even more errors.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Nick
------------------------------
From: "L. Mark Pilant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Celebris can't see outside world via ethernet
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:37:43 -0400
Greetings all. I have been attempting to get Linux up and running
on a PC I have. (I started with RH 4.2, then 5.1, and now 6.0.)
For the most part, it has all gone well. However, in every case
I haven't been able to get the network card to respond to the
outside world. I have usually been able to get local loopback to
work.
The configuration is a Digital (now Compaq) Celebris GL-2. This
is a 233MHz Pentium II machine with 128 Mb RAM and an on-board
ethernet interface (using the 21143, a.k.a. tulip chip.) This
PC runs Windows 98/NT/W2K without any network problems. (I have
set it up as a multi-boot system.)
I expect it is something fairly simple I have (or have not) done
which is preventing it from working.
One suggestion made was to force the use of twisted-pair (10BaseT)
rather than the autodetect. (I currently use twisted-pair for
everything.)
Below are extracts from /var/messages using various options in
/etc/conf.modules:
===================================================================
alias eth0 tulip
options tulip options=10 debug=6
...
eth0: Using user-specified media MII 10baseT-FD.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000000c6, MII.
eth0: 21142 negotiation failed, status 000000c6.
eth0: Testing new 21142 media 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0678006, CSR6 b3862002.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000000c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
===================================================================
alias eth0 tulip
options tulip options=12 debug=6
...
eth0: Using user-specified media 10baseT(forced).
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c7, 10baseT.
eth0: 21142 negotiation failed, status 000020c7.
eth0: Testing new 21142 media 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0678006, CSR6 b3862002.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000000c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c6, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
===================================================================
alias eth0 tulip
options tulip options=4 debug=6
...
eth0: Using user-specified media 10baseT-FD.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000000c7, 10baseT-FD.
eth0: 21142 negotiation failed, status 000000c7.
eth0: Testing new 21142 media 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0678006, CSR6 b3862002.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000000c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c6, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
eth0: 21142 negotiation status 000020c7, 100baseTx.
eth0: The transmitter stopped! CSR5 is f0008102, CSR6 b2420200.
===================================================================
Short of digging into the driver code, I'm not sure what this
is telling me and where to go from here.
Thanks in advance for any advice and suggestions.
- Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Transparent firewall - any such thing?
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:03:55 -0400
Kit,
I don't think you can do that. You'll need to setup networking on your
dad's computer.
Someone correct me if i'm wrong.
andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My dad just got a cable modem. He runs win98. We have an older PC
> which we can use as a firewall. How can this be done without setting
> up an internal network? My dad lost his Win98 CD.
>
> thanks.
> kit
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Jerry Craker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.ppp,redhat.networking.general
Subject: USR Speedster ISDN Problems (continuing)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 10:46:01 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all the help people have given me so far. The last thing
that I am having trouble with is my ISDN connection. I have recompiled
the kernel/modules to include support for the USR Internal ISDN adapter
(HiSax). Now, whenever i try to run a modprobe it gives me a device
busy error. It is an ISA ISDN adapter, which is (I believe) non-plug
and pray. Any suggestions would be appreciated. I really would like
to get off of NT altogether, and this step is necessary for me to do
so. I have successfully installed Linux on many other platforms, with
various adapters, but ISDN still is a mystery to me.
-- Jerry --
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 02:34:56 +1000
From: Paul Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2 Gateways over 2 separate devices
Heres my dhilemma (by the way, this is probably a VERY easy problem, but
i'm new to this):
I have a new Linux box, and I have two separate internet connections -
one using modem, the other using a network card. When I setup the
network card (which needs a specified gateway), the modem connection
needs a different gateway, else it doesn't work period. Problem is, then
telnet, icq etc die on the modem connection. Only stuff like Netscape
works!! Any way to get them both working together at the same time?
--
------------
[ zulu[iS] ]
------------
------------------------------
From: Alexander Bulanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIS+ and RedHat 6.0
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:27:00 +0400
Hi ;)
People, can I set up NIS+ client with RedHat 6.0? I've read NIS-HOWTO,
but there's said so few words 'bout it...
Just tell me, what can I read, and I'll be satisfied ;)
Thanx a lot!
--
Yours,
Alexander Bulanov, System Administrator of PRCNIT
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 30836209 FIDONET: 2:5053/25.16)
------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Odd?: sshd(2) accepts ssh1 but not ssh2 connects
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:37:45 -0400
Kyle,
I just installed ssh2 also. From what i understand, you don't need to install
ssh 1.2.27 at all. ssh2.0.13 should handle both ssh and ssh2 protocalls.
just a quick guess.
hope it helps tho!
andy
Kyle Ferrio wrote:
> I have compiled and installed both ssh 2.0.13 and ssh 1.2.27 (for fallback)
> with libwrap. I configured ssh2 and sshd2 for fallback compatibility.
> Also, sshd(2) is controlled by inetd.
>
> sshd (invoked as sshd->sshd2) accepts connections from ssh1.
> sshd drops connections from ssh2, like this:
>
> [kbf@mesa kbf]$ ssh2 mesa
> ratbert's password:
>
> Disconnected; protocol error (Protocol error: packet too long: -937278428.).
>
> The numerical value appears to change each time. I have not had much luck
> grepping through the sshd2 source yet.
>
> It would be nice if I could get ssh2 to connect to sshd2. :)
>
> Thanks for any advice,
> Kyle Ferrio
------------------------------
From: Kyle Ferrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Partial: sshd(2) accepts ssh1 but not ssh2 connects
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 09:12:41 -0700
Following up my own post:
The problem described below occurs on a Pentium II system.
I also compiled ssh1 and ssh2 (same versions) on a plain Pentium box.
The plain Pentium box has no problem with ssh(d)2 or ssh(d)1.
Everything works on the plain Pentium.
The 2.2.5-22 kernels for the two boxes were compiled with the same networking
options. The only relevant (?) differences are (1) i686 vs i386 compiles, and
(2) SMC vs 3COM hardware.
Has anyone ever seen something like this?
TIA,
Kyle
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Kyle Ferrio wrote:
>I have compiled and installed both ssh 2.0.13 and ssh 1.2.27 (for fallback)
>with libwrap. I configured ssh2 and sshd2 for fallback compatibility.
>Also, sshd(2) is controlled by inetd.
>
>sshd (invoked as sshd->sshd2) accepts connections from ssh1.
>sshd drops connections from ssh2, like this:
>
>[kbf@mesa kbf]$ ssh2 mesa
>ratbert's password:
>
>Disconnected; protocol error (Protocol error: packet too long: -937278428.).
>
>The numerical value appears to change each time. I have not had much luck
>grepping through the sshd2 source yet.
>
>It would be nice if I could get ssh2 to connect to sshd2. :)
>
>Thanks for any advice,
>Kyle Ferrio
------------------------------
From: "Hanno Stockhausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eepro100 - Transmit timed out
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:04:06 +0200
Hi
my linux box is equipped with two intel EtherExpress Pro 100 network
adapters. When I get heavy traffic on the network, I'll get the message
'Transmit timed out'.
I've seen already several mails in the net stating the same problem, but no
solution does work for me yet.
I use the kernel v2.2.10, eepro100 v1.08, I tried multicast_filter_limit=3
(after that it got better but still the error comes every one to five
minutes, depending on the traffic).
Does anyone have a solution for this?
HS
------------------------------
From: Neoklis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kppp/pppd not working with /dev/modem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:42:34 GMT
In article <7p41ng$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite) wrote:
> Neoklis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> : I have suse 6.0 installed on a PC and tried to connect on the net
using
> : kppp, but if I specify /dev/modem pppd dies when started. If I
specify
> : /dev/ttyS1, all is well. I tried a fresh symlink between /dev/ttyS1
and
>
> Hey, if /dev/ttyS1 works then why not use it?
I am now, since I don't know why /dev/modem fails.
>
> : /dev/modem but the fault persists. Also I cannot connect from the
> : terminal using ppp-up, I just get +++ATZ and a wait for the 1-minute
> : timeout .
>
> Depending on what you actually have in teh log it might be an IRQ
conflict.
> Or not. Exact copies of log messages almost always will provide
better
> answers than a narrative.
I made this posting in a hurry just before finishing my nightshift, and
ofcourse as rather new to Linux, didn't think of looking in
/log/messages.
The fault was in the suse ppp-up script, I had to add /dev/ttyS1 in the
pppd invocation to redirect the chat script from the terminal to the
modem.
Happy now, but I am told I have mail each time I log as root, but pine
shows nothing in inbox. Also the modem starts up after I log in,
presumably by diald for some reason.
--
Regards
Neoklis
My (ex-Acorn) RiscOS Homepage: http://www.arcsite.de/hp/neoklis
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPMAQSADM and Apache problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:49:21 GMT
Hi, I'm hoping someone can help me with the
following.
Below is an diagram of my linux-based network
(format with Courier or the like):
Internet
|
|
SDSL Router
x.x.10.105
|
|-------------------x.x.10.107
| (WAVE.OUTSIDEDOMAIN.COM)
| External Web Server
|
-------------------
| |
ETH1 ETH1:0
x.x.10.107 x.x.10.108
| Firewall |
| Server |
| |
------ETH0---------
192.168.1.20
|
|
|
Internal Web Server
(Linux/Apache, also running FTP/TELNET)
192.168.1.15
(BUCKET.INSIDEDOMAIN.COM)
More info:
** The DMZ outside the firewall is masked
255.255.255.248
** Inside the firewall masked 255.255.255.0
** The ethernet interface going from the firewall
to the internet has two IPS, one aliased
(x.x.10.108). It's IP on ETH0 to the inside
network is 192.168.1.20
** The Internal Web server's default gateway is
the firewall at 192.168.1.20
** IPCHAINS is running on the firewall
successfully. It's succesfully MASQing all
traffic from the inside to the outside. All other
traffic is blocked by setting the FORWARD chain to
default to DENY.
** I used IPMASQADM on the firewall to portforward
outside traffic from x.x.10.108 (the aliased
firewall IP) to 192.168.1.15 on ports 21, 23, and
80.
** I can Telnet and FTP from the internet to the
Internal Web server successfully (I know it's a
security risk -- I just need to do this for a
couple of weeks). So I guess IPMASQADM's working.
** I can also browse the Internal Web server from
the Internet via the main index.html page or any
other page DIRECTLY under the
/usr/local/apache/htdocs document directory BUT
...
The problem:
If I try to browse an HTML document on the
Internal Web Server in a directory below /htdocs,
for example,
/usr/local/apache/htdocs/august/report.html (using
a RELATIVE link), the page is not served up and in
the browser's status window I see something like:
"Cannot find server BUCKET.INSIDEDOMAIN.COM
(192.168.1.15)" Again, I'm using a RELATIVE link
and not referencing BUCKET or the .1.15 address at
all in the link, but that info is showing up
during a browse from the outside and the page is
not being served up.
Any ideas/solutions/commisserations would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Randy
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPMAQSADM and Apache problem
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:49:22 GMT
Hi, I'm hoping someone can help me with the
following.
Below is an diagram of my linux-based network
(format with Courier or the like):
Internet
|
|
SDSL Router
x.x.10.105
|
|-------------------x.x.10.107
| (WAVE.OUTSIDEDOMAIN.COM)
| External Web Server
|
-------------------
| |
ETH1 ETH1:0
x.x.10.107 x.x.10.108
| Firewall |
| Server |
| |
------ETH0---------
192.168.1.20
|
|
|
Internal Web Server
(Linux/Apache, also running FTP/TELNET)
192.168.1.15
(BUCKET.INSIDEDOMAIN.COM)
More info:
** The DMZ outside the firewall is masked
255.255.255.248
** Inside the firewall masked 255.255.255.0
** The ethernet interface going from the firewall
to the internet has two IPS, one aliased
(x.x.10.108). It's IP on ETH0 to the inside
network is 192.168.1.20
** The Internal Web server's default gateway is
the firewall at 192.168.1.20
** IPCHAINS is running on the firewall
successfully. It's succesfully MASQing all
traffic from the inside to the outside. All other
traffic is blocked by setting the FORWARD chain to
default to DENY.
** I used IPMASQADM on the firewall to portforward
outside traffic from x.x.10.108 (the aliased
firewall IP) to 192.168.1.15 on ports 21, 23, and
80.
** I can Telnet and FTP from the internet to the
Internal Web server successfully (I know it's a
security risk -- I just need to do this for a
couple of weeks). So I guess IPMASQADM's working.
** I can also browse the Internal Web server from
the Internet via the main index.html page or any
other page DIRECTLY under the
/usr/local/apache/htdocs document directory BUT
...
The problem:
If I try to browse an HTML document on the
Internal Web Server in a directory below /htdocs,
for example,
/usr/local/apache/htdocs/august/report.html (using
a RELATIVE link), the page is not served up and in
the browser's status window I see something like:
"Cannot find server BUCKET.INSIDEDOMAIN.COM
(192.168.1.15)" Again, I'm using a RELATIVE link
and not referencing BUCKET or the .1.15 address at
all in the link, but that info is showing up
during a browse from the outside and the page is
not being served up.
Any ideas/solutions/commisserations would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Randy
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Chris Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba - newbie
Date: 16 Aug 1999 19:24:16 -0700
"Stephen Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please help with details for a mega newbie if you can :)
You may want to purchase the Samba book then.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Chris Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie and Ethernet Card
Date: 16 Aug 1999 19:22:49 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Petty) writes:
> So what tools exist IN LINUX to check on IRQ matters?
>
of course not. you can use (usually) isapnp too. there aren't any
problems for pci stuff really.
-ckm
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
