Linux-Networking Digest #300, Volume #11 Thu, 27 May 99 01:13:33 EDT
Contents:
Re: LINUX AND MS PROXY SERVER ("PZKW V")
LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests PPP FAILURE! LARGE MSG (Brandon Edens)
Re: DNS: http://10.9.9.9/page.html -> http://www.dummy.net (Barry Margolin)
Re: Winbloze98-Telnet&FTP ? ("Andrey Smirnov")
How to change hostname on RH5.2 (Salman Ahmed)
Re: Getting out through a NT proxy server. ("PZKW V")
Re: Works now IP MASQ and Samba needs to work????? (Mike Parker)
DHCP/DNS Problem w RH5.2; Linux Can't Ping Itself (Lewis)
Re: Linux Users problem ("David Murray")
Frontpage extentions on Apache ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sendmail freaking out on me... (John Oliver)
Re: How to limit # connections to a port (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp problem ("Fernando")
Re: knfsd doesn't follow mounts? (Leslie Mikesell)
Can Apache1.3 support FP98?? (Ivan Liu)
Re: Iomega products and Linux (Dominic Mitchell)
Re: knfsd doesn't follow mounts? (Bart Locanthi)
Re: Pinging for behind IP Masq?? ("Matt Goebel")
Re: Pinging for behind IP Masq?? ("Matt Goebel")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "PZKW V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX AND MS PROXY SERVER
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 03:04:41 GMT
This works fine by adding the proxy server IP address to the Advanced
section in the Netscape Preferences.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7i4qkb$jp8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know how to get the entire TCP/IP of linux to go though MS
> Proxy?
>
> Carlos
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Gaetan Paquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Michael D. Underwood" wrote:
> >
> > > I am in a situation where I have to have a LINUX box behind a
> Microsoft
> > > Proxy Server. I would like to have the capablity of geting to the
> WWW on
> > > this :LINUX box through MS Proxy. Can someone please tell me how to
> do
> > > this???
> > >
> > > Any help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > You should'nt have any problems going through the web proxy
> (application
> > proxy)
> > all you have to do is to fill in the info ( ip address and port #) in
> the
> > "going through a proxy" section of the
> > web bowser you are using.... That's all.
> >
> >
>
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brandon Edens)
Subject: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests PPP FAILURE! LARGE MSG
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 22:29:58 GMT
Ok, I'm having problems with pppd 2.3.8 under RedHat 6.0
Basically I'm getting the LCP: timeout sending Config-Request error.
However, this is occuring on all 3 of my different ISPs. I will
include the information for an attempt at connecting to MSN.
Here is a copy of my /var/log/messages file:
May 26 13:02:16 Zeos ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/ttyS0 at
115200
May 26 13:02:17 Zeos pppd[2019]: pppd 2.3.8 started by root, uid 0
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (BUSY)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (ERROR)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (Invalid Login)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: abort on (Login incorrect)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: send (ATZ^M)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (OK)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: ATZ^M^M
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: OK
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: send (ATDT7528500^M)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (CONNECT)
May 26 13:02:18 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: ATDT7528500^M^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: CARRIER 50000^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: PROTOCOL: LAP-M^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: CONNECT
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: send (^M)
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (ogin:)
May 26 13:02:46 Zeos chat[2021]: 115200^M
May 26 13:02:51 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:51 Zeos chat[2021]:
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos last message repeated 23 times
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: UQKT2 tnt3.providence.ri.da.uu.net^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: Login:
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: send (MSN/JOEBLOW^M)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (ord:)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: MSN/JOEBLOW^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: Password:
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: send (JOEPASSWORD^M)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (IP)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: ^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: Entering PPP Session.^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: IP
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: send (^M)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: expect (~)
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: address is 153.35.183.130^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: MTU is 1524.^M
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: ~
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: -- got it
May 26 13:02:52 Zeos chat[2021]: send (^M)
May 26 13:02:53 Zeos pppd[2019]: Serial connection established.
May 26 13:02:53 Zeos pppd[2019]: Using interface ppp0
May 26 13:02:53 Zeos pppd[2019]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
May 26 13:02:54 Zeos pppd[2019]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0xdd60ef1> <pcomp> <accomp>]
May 26 13:03:21 Zeos last message repeated 9 times
May 26 13:03:24 Zeos pppd[2019]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
May 26 13:03:49 Zeos pppd[2019]: Modem hangup
May 26 13:03:49 Zeos pppd[2019]: Connection terminated.
May 26 13:03:50 Zeos pppd[2019]: Exit.
The IP is expected which sends a return.
The ~ shows that MSN has started pumping out PPP garbage
Here is a copy of the route -n output:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use Iface
10.49.99.152 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0
0 eth0
10.49.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 lo
Here is a copy of ifconfig output:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:3C:24:61
inet addr:10.49.99.152 Bcast:10.49.99.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:291 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
Here is a copy of the /etc/ppp/options file:
noipdefault
/dev/ttyS0
lock
crtscts
debug
passive
defaultroute
Ok, under all three of my different ISPs I get the LCP timeout error
message. Each ISP has a similar login screen as well. I have done
every alteration to /etc/ppp/options imagineable including changing
the amount of Config-Requests and the size of the restart. I have
called RH Tech Support and one of my ISPs tech support. I have
allready read through and followed
http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html#Types and read the
ppp-howto, the serial-howto and just about ever message excite could
find with the header the same as the subject of this post.
Any help would be appreciated. If any additional information is
required please reply.
Thank You
Natan (Brandon Edens)
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: DNS: http://10.9.9.9/page.html -> http://www.dummy.net
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 22:32:46 GMT
In article <7ihpdq$je1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Fredrik Lindstr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think the subject says it all ..
Not very clearly. I'm guessing you have a machine with the IP address
10.9.9.9, and when you enter http://10.9.9.9/page.html you want to see the
page you would have gotten if you'd entered http://www.dummy.net.
>Can you help me with this one?
You'll need to use an HTTP redirect. Configure your web server so that
when it receives a request for /page.html, it sends a redirect to
http://www.dummy.net. The details of how to do this depend on the web
server software you're running. The folks in
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix would probably be able to help you with
this (make sure you identify the server software and version).
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Winbloze98-Telnet&FTP ?
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:11:07 -0700
Hello!
It has everything to do with your routing!
Can you include output of netstat -rn and ifconfig -a please.
Good luck!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Whenever I try to connect to my linux server across my LAN using
>either WS-FTP or CRT(telnet) My dial-up tries to initiate. What is the
>easiest way to make my machines know that the linux server is local.
>My lan IP range is 10.0.0. which isnt even an internet adress range.
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
------------------------------
From: Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: How to change hostname on RH5.2
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 18:24:05 -0400
I tried using linuxconf to change my hostname from localhost.localdomain to
something more meaningful and here is what happened :
/etc/HOSTNAME is now an empty file (ie it contains nothing)
/etc/hosts contains just one entry :
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
and /etc/sysconfig/network looks like :
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4="no"
HOSTNAME="enigma"
GATEWAY=""
GATEWAYDEV=""
I changed the hostname to enigma. Xterms display the new hostname
fine, and the correct hostname is displayed at both console login screens
and at the XDM screen. But I know that the /etc/HOSTNAME file
should not be empty. And the /etc/hosts file should also contain an
entry to reflect the new hostname.
/etc/HOSTNAME should probably contain just enigma, right ?
But what is the correct entry for the /etc/hosts file ?
Thanks for any info.
PS : I am using RedHat Linux 5.2 w/ kernel 2.0.36.
--
Salman S. Ahmed
ssahmed AT interlog DOT com
Remove the "nospam." portion from my email address
to reply to this message.
------------------------------
From: "PZKW V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Getting out through a NT proxy server.
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 03:04:41 GMT
In the browser set the proxy to the IP address of the NT box.
Works great for browsing and mail. I have not tried FTP
Dana Bruce Simison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7hnlpb$u6v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a NT machine connected to the net through a cable modem. My linux
> box is on an internal network that is connected to the NT machine. The NT
> machine runs MS proxy server to allow the internal network to access the
> net.
>
> How can I get the linux box to use the proxy server?
>
> Dana Simison
>
>
------------------------------
From: Mike Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: Works now IP MASQ and Samba needs to work?????
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 23:52:32 +0100
Reply-To: Mike Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<snip>
>In article <7i9tej$gs8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
To too many groups. Follow ups trimmed.
--
Mike
Every one is more or less mad in their own way.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lewis)
Subject: DHCP/DNS Problem w RH5.2; Linux Can't Ping Itself
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 03:45:02 GMT
Folks,
I just recently installed RedHat v5.2 on a PC at work. We use (I
believe) a Windows NT network for PC servers (using 10baseT), and we
also have some Sun Sparc stations on the network. Our network assigns
PCs using DHCP.
When I have the Linux box request an IP address, it works fine, with
the following exception:
I have the Linux box named mylinux.mydomain.com (names have been
changed to protect the innocent). My NT computer is named
mynt.mydomain.com. We also have a Sun Sparc Station, called
mysparc.mydomain.com.
I can get to most systems using hostnames from the linux box (mylinux)
(i.e. I can get to the Internet through our firewall, and I can go to
our intranet, using Netscape), so in this respect, it works great.
But some systems I have to use the IP address to gain access to them,
including the linux box I am creating.
I get the following when I ping all machines from
mylinux.mydomain.com:
Host Pinged Pinging w hostname Pinging w IP address
mylinux unknown host OK
mynt unknown host OK
mysparc OK OK
I get the following when I ping all machines from mynt.mydomain.com:
Host Pinged Pinging w hostname Pinging w IP address
mylinux Bad IP address OK
mynt OK OK
mysparc OK OK
I get the following when I ping all machines from
mysparc.mydomain.com:
Host Pinged Pinging w hostname Pinging w IP address
mylinux unknown host OK
mynt unknown host OK
mysparc OK OK
I have read the mini-howto on DHCP, and have tried the -r and -h
options at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup at the line containing
the dhcpcd command, with no luck.
I have also used mylinux and mylinux.mydomain.com for the hostname in
netcfg, with no change (which is correct? I notice if I only use
mylinux, samba services take forever to startup on bootup.)
I am a newbie at setting this up (last time I used Linux was around
'93-94, and was using Slackware), but this has really getting me
befuddled.
Do I have no control over this? Is it the network DHCP server's
fault? Does it need to sit a while before it figures out the names?
It acts as though the nameservers (which it does find and puts in
resolv.conf) do not put the name i gave the linux box into the DNS
database.
The machine, when it was a Win95 box, was able to be pinged from my
PC (mynt). I'm not sure about the sparc station.
Help!
Thanks in advance for any help.
Completely confused,
===================================================
The Lewis's
Remove "NoSpam_" from email address if replying by email.
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Users problem
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 22:40:39 GMT
Are your users logging on via telnet? Or are they sharing drives with
Samba? What client program are they using for email?
--DavidM
Claude Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I am running redhat 5.0 on an Intel Pentium II server and roughly 2000
> users. We have been having a problem where users will suddenly be unable
to
> check e-mail or login. If I reset their password, everything works fine.
> Is this common?
>
> Claude Greer
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frontpage extentions on Apache
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 03:38:28 GMT
Hi,
I am trying to install the frontpage extentions into Apache. Apache is
installed as a RH RPM. I am using the fp_install.sh script provided
with FP. The problem occurs when trying to create the root web:
Creating root web
'../usr/local/www/htdocs' does not refer to a page in this web.
ERROR: / installation failed.
Hit enter to continue
Exiting due to an error! Please fix the error and try again.
/usr/local/www/htdocs is valid, and that is my root dir for webs. I
just don't get it. Permissions shouldn't be a problem because I am
logged on as root. Please help, I have run out of ideas.
Thanks
Spoogi
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver)
Subject: sendmail freaking out on me...
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 03:45:35 GMT
At about 3:30 this afternoon, I started getting these logs:
Security Violations
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
May 26 20:16:53 cx30162-a sendmail[17860]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):
getrequests: accept: Connection refused
May 26 20:18:26 cx30162-a sendmail[17860]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):
getrequests: accept: Connection refused
May 26 20:20:02 cx30162-a sendmail[17860]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):
getrequests: accept: Connection refused
logcheck runs every 15 minutes, and these messages come about a minute
after it runs, than roughly two minute intervals for a total of about
five minutes. Then, ten minutes of peace before it starts all over
again...
Any ideas as to what's causing these messages, and how to stop them?
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to limit # connections to a port
Date: 26 May 1999 23:13:52 GMT
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to limit the number of connections to a certain port?
> For example, I have a process running on port 8000 and I want to limit
> the number of connections to a max of 10 at any one time. IS this
> possible ? Thanks for any assistance
In the application. tcpserver, xinetd and g2s (super servers) support it, so
does most of the web servers.
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: "Fernando" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp problem
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 20:10:09 -0300
Hi Ron,
You are more advanced than me.
My RH 5. 2 stops in :
"sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0xa1f838d8> <pcomp>
<accomp>] "
"LCP : Timeout sending Config-Resquest "
.... and bye bye pppd.... :(
"....... I am getting to the end of my rope on Linux because I cant make
anything work ie.,
sound (sound blaster live), Printer (Lexmark execjet IIc), etc."
Me too ! :(
But, You are already connected.
Try :
ping 199.183.24.140 (www.redhat.com) . Did this work?
Then try :
ping www.redhat.com . Did this work? NO ?
Then add DNS IP addresses of the MindSping into /etc/resolv.conf :
(verify the domain and the correct IP addresses in your Win98)
search mindspring.com
nameserver 123.123.123.1
nameserver 123.123.123.2
Try again : ping www.redhat.com Did this work now?
Yes !? Then run netscape and "boa viagem" (good trip) !
I hope has helped this time.
Fernando Dammous
Sao Paulo/SP - Brazil
Ron Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu nas not�cias de
mensagem:7igrhi$nft$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp
>
> I was able to mount my Windows drive C: and cp the connection log to it as
a
> text file so now I can give more detail as to what is happening.
Connected
> but wont talk to mindspring using xdialppp (or anything else that I have
> tried).
>
> All help sincerely appreciated....... I am getting to the end of my rope
on
> Linux because I cant make anything work ie., sound (sound blaster live),
> Printer (Lexmark execjet IIc), etc.
>
> Thanks for any advice/guidance. It would really speed things up if I
could
> get a internet connection so I could search for help on these other
problems
> without having to kill SuSE and boot Win98.
>
>
> May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of
the
> University of California
> May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
> May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> May 26 08:28:11 localhost kernel: registered device ppp0
> May 26 08:28:11 localhost pppd[379]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: timeout set to 3 seconds
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (rAT^M)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: expect (OK)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: rAT^M^F^M
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: OK
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (ATH0^M)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: timeout set to 30 seconds
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: expect (OK)
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: ^M
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: ATH0^M^M
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: OK
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
> May 26 08:28:12 localhost chat[382]: send (ATL2DT4042873038^M)
> May 26 08:28:13 localhost chat[382]: expect (CONNECT)
> May 26 08:28:13 localhost chat[382]: ^M
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: ATL2DT4042873038^M^M
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: CONNECT
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: send (^M)
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: expect (netserv)
> May 26 08:28:29 localhost chat[382]: 26400^M
> May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: MindSpring Dialup Service^M
> May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: ^M
> May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: netserv
> May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
> May 26 08:28:31 localhost chat[382]: send ([EMAIL PROTECTED]^M)
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: expect (Password:)
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: -130.atl2 (s19) login:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: Password:
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: -- got it
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost chat[382]: send (abcdefg^M)
> May 26 08:28:32 localhost pppd[379]: Serial connection established.
> May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: Using interface ppp0
> May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
> 0xa0000> <magic 0xa1f838d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 26 08:28:33 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
> 0xa0000> <magic 0xa1f838d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
> <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb5eb588d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1500>
> <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xb5eb588d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
> 0.0.0.0>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost kernel: PPP BSD Compression module registered
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost kernel: PPP Deflate Compression module
registered
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate 15>
> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress
VJ
> 0f 00> <addr 168.121.1.1>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress
VJ
> 0f 00>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
> 209.86.53.93>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
> 209.86.53.93>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x1 80 fd 01 01
00
> 0f 1a 04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <compress
VJ>
> <addr 168.121.1.1>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x2 <compress
> VJ>]
> May 26 08:28:35 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
> 209.86.53.93>]
> May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
> 168.121.1.1>]
> May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
> 168.121.1.1>]
> May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: local IP address 209.86.53.93
> May 26 08:28:36 localhost pppd[379]: remote IP address 168.121.1.1
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: knfsd doesn't follow mounts?
Date: 26 May 1999 23:05:49 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bart Locanthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>again, i find it interesting that /n/ahab/src works from ahab - if it's
>not being short-circuited, it seems to me that the functionality is
>there but being blocked by some sort of permission thing.
>
>do you know how to get around this?
You should be able to export each filesystem explicitly on the
server and mount them in their respective positions on the
client.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ivan Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can Apache1.3 support FP98??
Date: 27 May 1999 03:34:21 GMT
Hi,
I use FrontPage98 build some homepages,
and I had a WWW server with RatHat5.2+Apache1.3,
Can Apache1.3 support FrontPage Server Extension???
Is it possible?
I don't use asp page, just simple html file, but they contain
some nav-bar in pages.....
Thans for any ideas.... ^_^
Ivan
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Iomega products and Linux
Reply-To: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 May 1999 19:17:36 -0400
Hi,
Maybe it is a to honest approach, but this the way I believe it has
to be. I believe the support I had from the Iomega Linux users had some
impact to fix my problem with Iomega. When I called them back after
I sent my message all over the net, the technician knew I was the
Linux guy just as I mentioned my name :-).
Anyway I was at friend place and had the unit installed on his
machine running Dos. The technician had us do very simple test ---
nothing more then I had done under Linux. He immediately offered to
replace the unit. I am under the impression they want me to calm
down a bit...
Next time I am buying hardware for my computers, I will make sure
that the companies do not have that attitude toward Linux users.
They won't force me into an OS I do not want.
Thanks for your support,
Dominic.
>>>>> "c" == Chameleon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
c> On 24 May 1999 23:49:14 -0400, Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
c> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The address for Iomega is Iomega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>>
>> The deceived customer.
>>
>> Dominic.
c> I have no problem with iomega scsi products under any Os; however, ide
c> versions of zip drives give the same problems in WindowsNT and Linux.
c> Sometimes not unmounting the drive properly and truncating the files
c> on the disk.
c> You are too honest and technical in your approach to iomega support.
c> Play dumb, they do not know what os you have unless you tell them.
c> Beside what you state, all they know is they have a very unsatisfied
c> customer. A lot companies "Do not Support Linux."
c> Take a different approch and get the some real help next time.
--
==============================================================
Dominic Mitchell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Economics mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
Canada, K7L 3N6 Running Linux Redhat 5.2
==============================================================
------------------------------
From: Bart Locanthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: knfsd doesn't follow mounts?
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 16:20:19 -0400
> The only time I've seen what you are describing is when the following
> file system is on a different partition or device.
>
> ie: if root is on /dev/hd1 and you mount it nfs you will not be able
> to see /usr if it is on say /dev/hd2 eventhough it is mounted on /
>
> Is this your case?
yes, this is exactly my case.
a mounted file system in unix is transparent to the user. it should also
be transparent to network users you want to whom you wish to offer the
file system.
this is the way things worked prior to knfsd, and i was assuming it was
the point of the sun nfs emulation.
again, i find it interesting that /n/ahab/src works from ahab - if it's
not being short-circuited, it seems to me that the functionality is
there but being blocked by some sort of permission thing.
do you know how to get around this?
thanks for your reply.
-bart
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pinging for behind IP Masq??
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 00:49:14 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's the problem, no external pinging, only internal (192.168.1.0/24)
I've got a firewall but it's not setup to block this out. ????
Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Matt Goebel wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to ping from a client on a masqueraded connection?
> Whats the Problem? The ICMP Packet is also Masqueraded so you would get
> a reply.
------------------------------
From: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pinging for behind IP Masq??
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 00:52:52 -0400
Reply-To: "Matt Goebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm using Redhat 6.0 isn't ICMP masq enabled by default?
Matt Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ihovc$a9s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is there a way to ping from a client on a masqueraded connection?
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
