Linux-Networking Digest #324, Volume #11 Sat, 29 May 99 03:14:29 EDT
Contents:
Re: DOS Clipper program with Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Printing to an smb printer from Netscape ..please help ("Joshy George")
Re: Apache permission user restriction ("Curt")
Conspiracy theory! Re: 3c509b croaked on 2.2.9 (Cameron)
Re: How do I use symbolic links(apache)? ("George Georgakis")
Re: IP Masq (Greg)
could I use another kernel? (John Hornblow)
Re: How do I use symbolic links(apache)? (Nicholas E Couchman)
DOS Clipper program with Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux wont initialize nic upon bootup (sometimes) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Printing Quota ("Christopher R. Thompson")
Linux to proxy http & pop (Arian)
Re: DHCP, Pump, RedHat5.2 Solved +NO!!! New problem! (Francois Magnan)
dsl and PPP at the same time... (John Moore)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DOS Clipper program with Linux
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 05:54:39 GMT
"K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion is to run a small Linux version (i.e. Debian) on each of
the
> 386's and telnet into the server. Once the telnet connection is up
and
> running, there is a MS-DOS emulator program that can be run that will
> provide the user with a 'C' prompt. The emulator program is DOSEmu
and
> comes with most Linux distributions or can be obtained from
www.dosemu.org.
> Clipper programs run right nice and will run about 50 times faster
than you
> are currently experiencing (will run at the speed of the server as no
code
> is being transfered over the network to the workstation, just 'screen'
> presentations). KAS
I've never tried from DOS, just NT, but in that case couldn't I just use
DOS to telnet with - still it sounds like an interesting idea which I
will try. ( I have a Linux slackware disk that came with a 2 or year old
web book, would this meet your criteria as a small Linux)It seems to me
the color and look of the program may be lost using telnet but it may
still be workable.
Dare I ask what you think of my suggested lowcost server. If one is
running 4 clipper DOS programs that use roughly 4 megs RAM each plus
providing file service to the other graphics computers will I be wanting
more server? Or perhaps a separate pair of small mirrored ide drives for
the clipper point of sale system.
I see all the push for powerful expensive servers - as an alternative to
mirrored drives does Linux have a capability of having a redundant
computer that sits their duplicating all the information and in the case
of a bad sector on the original system or other problem, then taking
over and running till the other system is repaired?
Ken
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I want to replace my WIN95 486 server - 1.8 gig FULL SCSI harddrive
with
> > a larger but economical box for a 7 station network.
> >
> > However 3 computers are 386's running DOS/Lantastic, I tried
previously
> > to run DOS CLIENT/netbui on them and though I did manage to see
drives
> > and copy files they would not work with my point of sale program
that is
> > Clipper based yr 2000 compatible and only needs 256k of lower memory
-
> > unfortunately it seems the 128 open files per station somehow is
> > incompatible - yet it works fine under Lantastic.
> >
> > What are my chances of running a DOS box in Linux (redhat6?) on the
> > 386's. Or is another DOS client available for the 386's I would like
to
> > cut my protocols to TCP/ip only if possible.
> >
> > Also on the Server I was thinking to try a couple large 7200 rpm IDE
> > drives mirrored. Is there a slowdown or speedup in doing this? None
of
> > my programs currently use the server for other than storage. But I
have
> > a printshop so have ever larger graphics files from PC and Mac to
> > contend with. I was thinking in terms of a lower end CPU, AMD 400
with a
> > single 128 meg sdram ecc sim so I have room for expansion.
> >
> > Open to recomendations.
> >
> > Ken Graham
> >
> > --
> > Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for email replies.
> > My SPAM address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Thinking to retire in southern Mexico - see www.re-mex.com
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
--
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for email replies.
My SPAM address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thinking to retire in southern Mexico - see www.re-mex.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Joshy George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Printing to an smb printer from Netscape ..please help
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 12:08:43 +0800
Hello,
I am trying to setup a linux box with RHL6.0, KDE etc.
I am running Samba on this PC for file and printer sharing.
One printer is already setup on this m/c using 'printtool', which is a
shared printer on a NT server.
The test page from printtool is printed okay(both ascii and postscript).
But when i try to print from Netscape, it doesn't work. Netscape pops up a
print dialog box, where I can enter the print commands. Is the default entry
'lpr' is enough there?
I am not familiar with lpr, etc.
Please help.
Thanks.
Joshy.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache permission user restriction
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:33:33 -0500
The only way I was able to make that to work was to execute
chmod 755 public_html and chmod 755 /home/'user'
I don't know if this is what I should have done, but I know it worked.
I don't like giving execute priviledges, so if someone knows a better or the
correct
way I'd be interested in seeing it.
Silil Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am getting this error message when I try to access a user on my web
> server.
> I am using Linux and Apache
> All the .conf files a basicly the same as when they were first
> installed. I have a public.html directory in the jeremy user directory
> and I have done everything by the book.
> I want to be able to access the html files that are in the public.html
> file of the user jeremy.
>
> Thank you
>
> Jeremy Douglas
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Conspiracy theory! Re: 3c509b croaked on 2.2.9
Date: 29 May 1999 03:00:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, root wrote:
> My 3c509b (eth0) stopped working when I upgraded to 2.2.9. When I
>recompile it as a module, and run insmod 3c509.o, I get a warning:
>
>init_module: Device or resource busy
>
> I get the same warnings when I try to activate the interface on startup.
>Funny, it did seem to work under 2.2.7, yet I cannot find anything in the
>change log to indicate how or why this might have become broken. So, I am
>reluctantly preparing to downgrade back to 2.2.7 and see if this fixes the
>problem.
Was this on a dual-boot machine by any chance?
A buddy of mine at 3com called me a few days ago, his 3C509B had
suddenly stopped working, in Linux, after he moved to a new office.
Still worked fine in Win-95.
In the new office, he'd had to boot his Win-95 for something,
and some netware thing on the network was different and
Microsoft Windows 95 Hardware Wizard had popped up and fixed it.
Turns out while Microsoft Windows 95 Hardware Wizard was fooling with
the IPX stuff, it also changed the interrupt setting on his 3C509B.
(He had NOT changed any hardware settings or configuration,
nor added nor removed anything, nor changed Linux.)
I had him run the diag/config program
(it's on the disk you get with the card if you buy it from a
dealer who's honoring his contracts...) and find out to where
the interrupt had moved.
I gotta wonder how much of this shit is intentional. Does
Microsoft monkeywrench the other OS on a dual boot system
by *accident*?
Cameron
(not a 3Com employee any more)
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <linuxstart.com@geegee>
Subject: Re: How do I use symbolic links(apache)?
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 06:06:37 GMT
I know this sounds weird, but I had the same problem (Slack 3.4, Apache
1.2.4).
My fix was simply to make the directory itself world-executable (chmod 755
<dirname>).
Works for me *shrug*.
George
===========================================================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
If necessary, however, I can be contacted thru linuxstart.com@geegee.
(Swap "geegee" and "linuxstart.com").
===========================================================================
Dunn One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I am running RH5.2 and apache server. I created a folder link in the
> default web directory(/home/httpd/html). However, I can't access the
> files in it. It's driving me insane. I keep on getting the forbidden
> error. This folder link is to a directory in the /usr hierarchy. I gave
> this /usr... folder directory permissions in access.conf. I also used
> chmod on the files in the /usr..hierarchy. Is there anything else I can
> do, please help.
> How do I change the default document root without getting the
> forbidden error whenever I try to access it? What is the full procedure?
>
> Does anyone recommend any resources to help me, books or otherwise. The
> faqs and how-tos are hopelessly inadequate...thanks
>
>
------------------------------
From: Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: IP Masq
Date: 28 May 1999 22:20:21 -0400
Here it is, and I'm sorry to post something so long- but is helpful...
Gregm
======================================================================
As promised, here is the micro-howto on how to set up IP Masquerading
under RedHat 5.2. It may apply to other versions/distributions, YMMV.
I'm writing this, by the way, because (1) the published howto's are
missing information or contain information that is incorrect or does
not apply to RH 5.2 and (2) setting up IPmasq seems to be a frequent
task.
This document is not a substitute for the published howto's. In fact,
the first thing you should do is go out and read the IP Masquerade,
NET-3 and Firewall howtos. Also, I do not use the GUI admin tools.
I'm sure you can do most of this using them, but you are on your own.
The first thing you will need to do is install and configure two
ethernet cards (or one ethernet card and one PPP connection) in your
machine. From now on, I'm going to assume that you are using two
ethernet cards in your machine with one of them connected to a cable
modem, but everything should apply to masquerading over ppp as well.
Substitute as needed.
This is the first area where the RedHat manual is incorrect. You *do
not* need to recompile the kernel to use two ethernet cards of the
same type. The NET-3 howto tells you how to configure additional
ethernet cards, but if you have cheezy PCI NE2000 cards, all you need
to do is add the following line to /etc/conf.modules:
alias eth1 ne2k-pci
For example, my /etc/conf.modules looks like this since I have two
identical PCI NE2000 clones:
alias eth0 ne2k-pci
alias eth1 ne2k-pci
If you need an ethernet card, go see Ray at Alpha Computers. He'll
hook you up with one of these for $17 at the store or $11 at one of
the shows.
Next you will need to configure the IP addresses for each card. I've
chosen to use eth0 for my cable modem and eth1 for my internal
network. It doesn't matter which you choose so if you already have
one card set up and working, just reverse things.
IP addresses are configured by files in the directory
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts . If you already have an ethernet card
in the machine, you should see a file called ifcfg-eth0, and it should
look something like this, where x.y.z.q is the address of your cable
modem (or other assigned outgoing addres)
DEVICE=eth0
IPADDR=x.y.z.q
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=x.y.z.0
BROADCAST=x.y.z.255
ONBOOT=yes
You will need to create an additional file ifcfg-eth1 for the card for
your local network. It should look *exactly* like this:
DEVICE=eth1
IPADDR=192.168.1.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.1.0
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
ONBOOT=yes
You *can* choose another subnet for your local net, but 192.168.1.0 is
*strongly* recomended. Using 192.168.1.1 is a nice choice since this
will be the default gateway you give to the machines on your local net
and it is customary for gateways of small lans to end in .1
You will now need to edit the file /etc/sysconfig/networks. Make it
look something like this:
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=true
HOSTNAME=qwerty.catv1.md.home.com
DOMAINNAME=catv1.md.home.com
GATEWAY=x.y.z.1
GATEWAYDEV=eth0
This file needs a bit of explaination. I've chosen to let the
hostname and domainname be those assigned by the cable co, but I don't
think this really matters. What is important is that you set up the
GATEWAY and GATEWAYDEV options. These are the gateway to your ISP and
the device to which it is connected. Also very important is the
FORWARD_IPV4 flag. By default, it is set to false, and *NONE* of the
howtos tell you to turn it on. I struggled for a full day before
GregM mentioned this to me at the LUG meeting. Grrr...
Once you have edited these files, reboot the machine. Hopefully you
will be able to talk over both interfaces. All of the routing should
be taken care of by the network scripts. From the masquerading box
you should be able to ping other machines on your local net and you
should be able to connect through your ISP link. If you cannot, do
not proceed any futher, because everything depends on this. By the
way, if you have a cable modem and you moved it from one ethernet card
to another, you *MUST* press the reset switch on the back of the box
while it is connected to your machine and your machine is powered up.
It WILL NOT work otherwise. You'll also need to wait until the
"cable" light stops flashing. (This also took me a day to discover.
Grrr...)
Now you are ready to set up the masquerading software. Contrary to
the howtos, you *do not* need to recompile the kernel, since RH 5.2
comes with everything set up out of the box. You may notice that with
RH 5.2 you shouldn't need to recompile the kernel AT ALL to get IP
masquerading working. That isn't to say that you can't or that you
shouldn't. There are a few additional options that are a good idea to
enable, but they really aren't necessary. Once you get everything
else working, feel free to go back and tweak.
In order to *TEST* IPmasq, issue he following command:
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a accept -m
This should masq packets from your local net to the outside world. If
it doesn't check the configuration of the machines on your local
network. If it does, immediately reboot your machine, because you
will be masquerading *all* packets coming into your machine, which is
a bad thing.
The following set of rules seems to be reasonable, and you should add
them to rc.local or wherever you do machine-specific configurations:
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -f
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S192.168.1.0/24 -D0.0.0.0/0
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a deny -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D 0.0.0.0/0 -o
(Morty: If you've read this far, care to comment on the security
aspects of using just these four fules?)
You can get very fancy with your filtering rules. In section 4 of the
IPmasq howto there is a sample that includes some 20 rules for fairly
robust security and logging. Armed with a printout of the ipfwadm man
page you can interpret most of them. At some point, I'm sure I'll do
this myself.
All in all, setting up IPmasq is really quite simple under RH 5.2. In
fact, once you have your interfaces configured properly, it is as
simple as making sure IPV4 forwarding is turned on and issuing a
single ipfwadm command.
If anyone has any problems, feel free to ask...
-p.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hornblow)
Subject: could I use another kernel?
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 06:44:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi, Ive had no luck [yet!] compiling a kernel that enables
Masquerading...
Could I use one from someone else?
If someone emailed me one would it work on my redhat 6.0 machine?
thanks
John
=====================================================
John Hornblow
gliding page http://www.soar.co.nz/
=====================================================
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I use symbolic links(apache)?
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 04:00:38 GMT
If you are getting a forbiden error, make sure that the directory you are
creating a link to is readable by everyone (or whom ever you want to be able
to read it). Also make sure that there is an index.htm or index.html file
in the directory or directory browsing is enabled. I also linked to a
folder in the /usr directory (specifically, the Linux Doc Project Sys Admin
Guide [/usr/doc/LDP/sag/]). I created a folder called 'sag' in the
/home/httpd/html tree and I ran the following command.
ln -s /usr/doc/LDP/sag sag
The link worked perfectly. If you do create a link like this, you should be
able to sit down at the console and cd from /home/httpd/html to sag and end
up with all the files in the /usr/doc/LDP/sag. They aren't moved, just
linked.
Hope this helps some!!
--Nick
Dunn One wrote:
> I am running RH5.2 and apache server. I created a folder link in the
> default web directory(/home/httpd/html). However, I can't access the
> files in it. It's driving me insane. I keep on getting the forbidden
> error. This folder link is to a directory in the /usr hierarchy. I gave
> this /usr... folder directory permissions in access.conf. I also used
> chmod on the files in the /usr..hierarchy. Is there anything else I can
> do, please help.
> How do I change the default document root without getting the
> forbidden error whenever I try to access it? What is the full procedure?
>
> Does anyone recommend any resources to help me, books or otherwise. The
> faqs and how-tos are hopelessly inadequate...thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DOS Clipper program with Linux
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 06:46:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to replace my WIN95 486 server - 1.8 gig FULL SCSI harddrive with
a larger but economical box for a 7 station network.
However 3 computers are 386's running DOS/Lantastic, I tried previously
to run DOS CLIENT/netbui on them and though I did manage to see drives
and copy files they would not work with my point of sale program that is
Clipper based yr 2000 compatible and only needs 256k of lower memory -
unfortunately it seems the 128 open files per station somehow is
incompatible - yet it works fine under Lantastic.
What are my chances of running a DOS box in Linux (redhat6?) on the
386's. Or is another DOS client available for the 386's I would like to
cut my protocols to TCP/ip only if possible.
Also on the Server I was thinking to try a couple large 7200 rpm IDE
drives mirrored. Is there a slowdown or speedup in doing this? None of
my programs currently use the server for other than storage. But I have
a printshop so have ever larger graphics files from PC and Mac to
contend with. I was thinking in terms of a lower end CPU, AMD 400 with a
single 128 meg sdram ecc sim so I have room for expansion.
Open to recomendations.
Ken Graham
--
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for email replies.
My SPAM address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thinking to retire in southern Mexico - see www.re-mex.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux wont initialize nic upon bootup (sometimes)
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 06:53:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen) wrote:
>
> Kernel 2.0.36 kompiled from source? redhat? Clean source?
I compiled kernel from source. It is not redhat. What do you mean by
clean source?
> Drivers into kernel or as modules?
Drivers have been compiled into the kernel. Should it go in as modules?
> Output of:
>
> ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:C0:F9:5D:E2
inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:203.128.6.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:10181 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:7040 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x250 Memory:c0000-c2000
> cat /proc/interrupts
0: 5813234 timer
1: 38772 keyboard
2: 0 cascade
3: 17023 SMC EtherEZ
4: 122 + serial
12: 285 PS/2 Mouse
13: 1 math error
14: 96995 + ide0
15: 98179 + ide1
> cat /proc/ioports
0000-001f : dma1
0020-003f : pic1
0040-005f : timer
0060-006f : keyboard
0080-009f : dma page reg
00a0-00bf : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : npu
0170-0177 : ide1
01f0-01f7 : ide0
0240-025f : SMC EtherEZ
0376-0376 : ide1
03c0-03df : vga+
03f0-03f5 : floppy
03f6-03f6 : ide0
03f7-03f7 : floppy DIR
03f8-03ff : serial(auto)
>
> Wich card does not work well? (the 'IRQ 3' on the SMC EtherEZ can
> conflict with your com2. (or com1, depends))
As you can see from the above, I have no com2 and there are no irq3
conflicts.
> Since you have two smc-nic's, http://www.smc.com and search for setup
I have just 1 smc card in the problem machine.
> Only one card set to full duplex? Wrong cable? irq conflict? pci-card
> in the machine takes the resources the nic need..
There are no full duplex cards in any of the machines on the network.
The machine with the PCI card (a non-SMC NIC) is working okay (and has
the same configuration as the problem machine).
Thanks for your help,
khassan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Christopher R. Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing Quota
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:45:26 -0700
Try "man pac".
------------------------------
From: Arian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux to proxy http & pop
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 04:14:36 GMT
I'm configuring a linux box to proxy http & pop requests for windows
boxes from an internal network to an ISP. I've got squid doing the http
wonderfully, however I'm not sure what product to use to allow the
windows boxes to check their mail. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Arian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Subject: Re: DHCP, Pump, RedHat5.2 Solved +NO!!! New problem!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Francois Magnan)
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 20:52:40 GMT
It seems that DHCPCD tries to execute /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth*.exe.
I don't know if it will work. Something very strange is still going
on. If I reboot and try
/sbin/dhcpcd eth1
I get a timeout waiting for a server and never get an address.
If I run /sbin/pump it works instantly and I get an IP.
Now, I kill pump and do "ifdown eth1" and try to execute dhcpcd again
and now it works!!! But I get a different address than before.
Why does DHCP need pump to get to the server???
Pump seems to work well for me but will there be a feature to execute
a script when your ip changes like in DHCP???
Thank you,
Francois Magnan
On 05/28/99, Francois Magnan wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I am now able to use DHCPCD in RedHat5.2 with the new kernel
>of RedHat6.0: 2.2.5. I followed
>
>http://www.pdc.kth.se/~jas/dhcpcd-on-redhat-with-linux-2.2.html
>
>The only thing I am missing now is that the ifdhcpc-done script
>doesn't get executed after I call DHCP. I need this badly because my
>firewall script must get reexecuted! What can I do?
>
>Francois
>--
>______________________________________________________
>Francois Magnan
>Departement de Mathematique & Statistiques
>Universite de Montreal
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MIME, NeXTMail Ok!)
>
>
--
______________________________________________________
Francois Magnan
Departement de Mathematique & Statistiques
Universite de Montreal
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MIME, NeXTMail Ok!)
------------------------------
From: John Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dsl and PPP at the same time...
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 20:55:28 -0700
I have just installed a SuSE 6.1 system. I have a dsl connection for Internet
access and occasionally have to PPP into my office network. With the dsl
network live, after the connection is made to work using PPP, the following
message "May 28 20:26:30 greyhawk2 pppd[352]: not replacing existing default route to
eth0 [10.0.0.1]" appears in
/var/log/messages and I can not connect to any hosts on my work network. When
I view the linux routing table, there is an explicit route to the next hop
address for the PPP interface and the default route to the dsl network is still
in place. Bottom line is that I can not connect to any sites on my work
network.
My question is this... what do I need to do for there to be a route over the
PPP connection??
I want to add I am not very experience in Unix/linux... I know just enough to
be very dangerous.
Thanks for any suggestions,
John
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
