Linux-Networking Digest #324, Volume #10 Sat, 27 Feb 99 19:13:38 EST
Contents:
Re: Problems with USR 33.6KB Modem and PPP Server (Tom Taylor)
Re: Gateway config help (JoHn DoH)
Tunneling and MTU (Carl Raymond)
diald 0.98.3 compile nogo - netlink.h suspected (Bob)
Multicast Routing (mrouter) questions... ("Brian J. Jarrett")
2.2.2 ping things. (Jay Thorne)
Neworking Libs? (JoHn DoH)
Re: domain with remote hosts? (Juergen Heinzl)
Re: domain with remote hosts? (Malware)
Re: diald 0.98.3 compile nogo - netlink.h suspected (Malware)
Re: Cannot UDP Bind to port 61000 or greater (Malware)
Re: ISDN and PPP with multiple telephone numbers? (Malware)
Re: SAMBA 2.02 & NT4 (Tom Taylor)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Re: ?: how is the loopback created; please help (ronald s chong)
Re: domain with remote hosts? ("Duane Elmer Smeckert")
Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet (Marc Hering)
Re: _Good_ (support 5+ systems) Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard switch for pc... (Yan Seiner)
Re: PCI modems in linux? (David Fox)
Slow Masquerading ("Sven Burgener")
��ݯ}�X��{�Ѥ�-�M�~�� V 2.0 - "�W�����ѱ��y��" ��k !!! ("Fong's")
Re: PCI modems in linux? (Robert Krawitz)
Re: Internet Telephony ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
telnet troubles ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Problems with DNS & Firewall (Bj�rn Griese)
rcp does not work? (Jeff Batten)
Re: Cannot get to LILO boot: anymore (Tom Oswald)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Taylor)
Subject: Re: Problems with USR 33.6KB Modem and PPP Server
Date: 21 Feb 1999 08:11:22 GMT
I've been using the factory defaults (at &f) for several months with no
problem. Could you have overwritten or damaged the modem defaults?
Tom
In article <KtHz2.10510$Lz1.489@wards>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>I have setup a PPP server so that Windows 95 clients can dial in.
>
>After about 2 weeks of frustration and hair pulling, I now look a bit like
>Homer Simpson :) , I managed to get the system to recognise the Window95
>clients with AutoPPP.
>
>However I was reconfiguring my modem and issues the wrong AT command which
>overwrote the template in memory with the factory defaults, and when I dial
>in now I am just getting a lot of garbage appearing on the terminal screen
>(not PPP packages).
>
>Does anyone know what the settings should be for a US Robotics 33.6KB
>External Voice Modem. Configurations of flow control, baud settings etc.
>
>I would like the modem to be able to autobaud depending on the maximum speed
>of the client dialling in.
>
>Any tips would be most appreciated.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gateway config help
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 22:19:39 GMT
Try this:
route -n add x.x.x.x gw y.y.y.y
this will create a gate way from x to y. I hope that helps (you were a
little unclear for me to be sure what is truely going on :-).
-DoH
Corporate Collection Services wrote:
>
> I'm trying to configure a linux pc as a gateway for two IP systems, and I'm
> having a little trouble putting in the routing statements. The systems have
> a 10.x.x.x series IP and a 100.x.x.x series IP addresses. Can anyone help
> by posting the proper routing addresses statements to make it work? Thanks
> so much.
>
> Stu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl Raymond)
Subject: Tunneling and MTU
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:07:34 GMT
Hi,
I've got a question about IP-over-IP tunneling and the MTU value. I want to
set up tunneling between two Linux routers to connect two private LANs
(numbered 192.168.x.x). When I use ifconfig -a, I can see the tunl0 and tunl1
interfaces. Their MTU's are 1480, which is 20 bytes less than the 1500 on
eth0 and eth1. This accounts for the IP header of the inner packet, right?
So suppose I'm transmitting a large file from an internal machine over the
tunnel. There would be a long sequence of 1500-byte packets (the inside hosts
by default use the standard 1500-byte MTU). When these get to the router, it
seems mightly unlikely that the router could re-pack them into 1480-byte
packets efficiently -- instead, it's going to take each incoming packet and
turn it into two packets, one of size 1480 and one of size 20. This can't be
good for efficiency.
So am I better off using an MTU of 1480 for all nodes on the inside hosts?
And I would still want an MTU of 1500 for the router, right?
Carl
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Subject: diald 0.98.3 compile nogo - netlink.h suspected
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 14:45:05 -0700
Hi all,
RedHAT 5.2 kernel 2.0.36
Trying to compile diald version 0.98.3. The 'make depend' step
burped that it could not locate the /linux/netlink.h file.
I found one in /usr/src/include so pointed the offending file
(tap.c) at that netlink.h and the make depend finished cleanly.
The next step 'make' burped a few times then a fatal error on an
undeclared: NETLINK_TAPBASE... I suspect the netlink.h file.
SO my questions are:
1) is netlink.h part of a library and if so which one so I can go
hunting for a later version?
2) Has anyone else had this trouble and if so how did you remedy?
As an aside: when I edit a 'nakefile' or whatever.c file with Emacs and
then try to 'make', when I go back to that file it is 'read only' haven't
figured that one out yet either.
Thanks in advance to anyone who take the time to respond!
------------------------------
From: "Brian J. Jarrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multicast Routing (mrouter) questions...
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:07:50 -0700
My main question is: How do I get this to work?
I'm running ImageCast on one subnet and want it to be able to use it to
multicast Hard Drive images to another subnet. I have a Linux machine with
kernel 2.2.2 compiled for IP multicasting, IP forwarding, and IP multicast
routing. I've added the route 224.0.0.0 to my routing table (route add -net
224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0 dev eth1) where eth1 is connected to the second
network that I want to flood with multicast packets. Normal routing works
fine, although I had to add an entry to the Controller machines routing
table for the second network. The other thing that throws a wrench into
this is that my original subnet now has two routers, one to connect to the
internet, and the new linux router. This means that the default gateway for
my Controller machine points to the internet router. Is this the problem
and is there any way around it?
To summarize:
I have a Testlab network connected to the internet via my default gateway.
I have the Testlab2 network connected to the Testlab network via a linux
router. The Controller on the Testlab network cannot get the multicast
packets to the client on the Testlab2 network even though I can ping IP
addresses on both sides. I have set up a route on the linux machine for the
multicast packets but they aren't getting to the Testlab2 network.
Any info would be helpful.
Thanks,
Brian
------------------------------
From: Jay Thorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2.2.2 ping things.
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 21:45:13 GMT
I can ping localhost in 2.2.2 but not either of my ethernet card addresses.
Nor can I get aliasing working. These all worked as expected in 2.0.36
Anyone got any pointers for me?
--
Jay Thorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] KE Software
http://www.kesoftware.com
------------------------------
From: JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Neworking Libs?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 22:28:50 GMT
Anyone know where I can find some good C libs to handle networking such
as tcp/ip packet managment aswell as other services like
telnet/ftp/finger/talk/ what everelse (you know...)?
Thanks
-DoH
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: domain with remote hosts?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:39:33 GMT
In article <7b9p8r$2na$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What are you talking about???
I guess it's I who's meant ...
>It was an example.. I didn't want to advertise her domain in the newsgroup!
>She did tell me I could, so I didn't. I made up the domain blah.net as a
>example... Her's is something totally different.
... yes. Might be I got you wrong (?). Okay, assuming she *is* authoritative
for a certain zone, foobar.net and you want to be visible via ...
nslookup yourmachine.foobar.net
... too I cannot see a problem (she really should know) some confusion aside,
since a reverse DNS lookup will lead to *two* different results for some
time, depending which NS responds. In other words using the same address for
two different FQDN's just for fun ... you must not do that either 8)
In addition there is a MX record, for instance, for foobar.net ... now mail
sent to your machine will go to the mail exchanger for foobar.net of course
and so on and so on.
In other words, please do not mess around with the DNS, it might result in
things you cannot say anything about yet.
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
\ Phone Private : +44 181-332 0750 \ /
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: domain with remote hosts?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:41:38 +0100
Hi Gut,
you wrote:
> I have a friend with a cool domain and a good job. She can afford a leased
> line and a domain and I can't. I dialup to my ISP and what we want to do
> seems simple, but I'm not exactly sure how to do it. I want my RH5 system to
> be a host on her domain (she has FreeBSD).
Technically it's quite simple if your friend is running the nameserver
for here domain. She then just needs to add one entry to the zone file.
But as she seems not to know how this is working she probably do not run
the nameserver herself and have to ask here ISP to adding such an entry.
Additionally you might want ask your ISP if this would be OK - don't
know you need to do so.
> I have a static IP address from my ISP, but it is not on the same Class-C as
> her's. We can probably talk to the ISP and get our IP's on the same Class-C
> if that would do it.
It does not need to be in the same network. But the reverse lookup will
gain another name then but that should be ok. Moving your IP into here
subnet is not a good idea but might be possible if you are connected to
the same ISP.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald 0.98.3 compile nogo - netlink.h suspected
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:53:01 +0100
Hi Bob,
you wrote:
> Trying to compile diald version 0.98.3. The 'make depend' step
> burped that it could not locate the /linux/netlink.h file.
I do not know especially about diald in this version but it seems to be
designed for Linux 2.1/2.2.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot UDP Bind to port 61000 or greater
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 00:03:14 +0100
Hi Thomas,
you wrote:
> Under Red Hat Linux 5.2 I cannot bind a udp socket to port 61000 or
> greater.
The ports 61000-65095 are used for the masquerading.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: ISDN and PPP with multiple telephone numbers?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 23:02:19 +0100
Hi Michael,
you wrote:
> telnet aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa -> then dial number 12345
> telnet bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb -> then dial number 54321
> telnet ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc -> then dial number 99999
Setup three ippp-Devices and 3 ipppds and set the routing accordingly.
Malware
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Taylor)
Subject: Re: SAMBA 2.02 & NT4
Date: 21 Feb 1999 08:22:46 GMT
If your using RH5.2 there is an article about this (using plain text passwords)
for authentication. It's located in
/usr/doc/samba-1.9.18p10/docs/NT4Plain...).
Tom
In article <7amqq6$a20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
>I am trying to see linux mount from NT .. I can see the computer ,, but it
>cannot authenticcate the password ... I tried using SWAT to configure . ..
>but still cannot see Linux Shares ... HELP
>
>thanks,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,vmsnet.networks.misc
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 15:10:18 -0800
Please forgive my off topic rant.
Please take this "discussion" to a single newsgroup.
In general, I can see no reason for posting any message in
this many groups.
Further, if you MUST reply, if you just can't shut up, then at
least be courteous enough to edit the Newsgroups to only
the one you are in.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ronald s chong)
Subject: Re: ?: how is the loopback created; please help
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 21:24:54 GMT
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:02:33 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ronald s chong)
wrote:
> hi there. i recently upgraded from rh4.2 to rh5.2 and have since
> upgraded the kernel to 2.2.1. i have no loopback on bootup.
well, i solved the problem. i startup in runlevel 5 in order to make
X start automagically on bootup. i discovered that /etc/rc.d/rc5.d
did not have a link to the network start script (/etc/init.d/network).
so i just needed to do:
cd /etc/rc.d/rc5.d
ln -s ../init.d/network S10network
btw, i noticed rc3.d/ did have this link to start the network. level 3
is the default startup runlevel (specified in /etc/inittab) for a
redhat install, hence why it would be in rc3.d.
after the above fix, all is as it should have been. i think this *MAY*
a redhat bug; they don't have this link in rc5.d. <shrug>
-ron
------------------------------
From: "Duane Elmer Smeckert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: domain with remote hosts?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 15:18:38 -0800
It sounds simple enough.
Go to rs.internic.net and get the DNS form "whois {her_cool.domain}"
on those machines, edit the /etc/hosts to have the line
{my_host}.{her_cool.domain} {my.static.ip}
(feel free to make substitutions in the above)
That way, you are in her domain, just not in her net.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7b91bp$f99$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a friend with a cool domain and a good job. She can afford a leased
>line and a domain and I can't. I dialup to my ISP and what we want to do
>seems simple, but I'm not exactly sure how to do it. I want my RH5 system
to
>be a host on her domain (she has FreeBSD).
>
>ie. she is (lets say) thinker.blah.net
> I want to be einstein.blah.net
>
>I have a static IP address from my ISP, but it is not on the same Class-C
as
>her's. We can probably talk to the ISP and get our IP's on the same Class-C
>if that would do it.
>
>Could anyone please give me some insight into what has to be done.
>Thanks
>Gut.
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Marc Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:20:46 GMT
you would need some modem sharing software that is Unix friendly,I know
of several that will share modem that is on a windows box,,but it
requires you to load software on the client side,,and they only support
M$ stuff,,I dont know of any that allow anyone to use the
connection,,,,the best thing to do is do this the other way around
ie
win98------>Linux------->modem------>internet
you can set this up using diald and IP forwarding/masquerading
Hope this helps
GN wrote:
> =
> HI !
> I.m up to a little problem :|
> =
> I have a network with 2 computers and the first one is a Linux system
> (Redhat 5.2) and the second one is a PC with W98.
> And my question is as follow.
> =
> 1. Can a connect to the internet with my linux comp by going trough my
> win98computer who already is connected to Internet via modem?
> =
> If any1 can send me to the right spot where to find this information i=B4=
ll be
> graetful.
> =
> /GN
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
Subject: Re: _Good_ (support 5+ systems) Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard switch for pc...
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:39:55 -0500
A PS/2 mouse is a crippled serial port mouse, no more or less. A few bucks will
get you an adapter.
Yan
Michael Meissner wrote:
> 2) it only handles
> ps/2 mice (not serial).
------------------------------
From: d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u (David Fox)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: 26 Feb 1999 15:00:11 -0800
"John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Can a PCI modem be used in linux?
>
> Zzzzz.... *snort* Wha...?
>
> Why in the world would you need a 60+MHz parallel bus to talk to a device
> pumping bits serially at less than 60kHz?
Because there's a sound card and an old ethernet card in my ISA slots...
> In addition, you can't power-cycle a wedged internal bus modem to reset it.
And there's a palmpilot and a digital camera plugged into my serial
ports.
--
David Fox http://hci.ucsd.edu/dsf xoF divaD
UCSD HCI Lab baL ICH DSCU
------------------------------
From: "Sven Burgener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slow Masquerading
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:01:28 +0100
Hello all,
I have set up a Linux box acting as a Gateway. (SuSE Krnl. Ver. 2.0.35) It
all works fine, and I use masquerading to allow me surfing from the entire
LAN. So far so good.
The problem is that when my Linux box is up on the Net, (Dial-Up to ISP w/z
V.90 Modem and the pppd) and is processing some things like fetchmail or
whatever, it takes a long time to telnet it for example, and it's just
really slow.
Also, when I am sometimes surfing, it seems as though it takes *years* to
resolve an IP. That is really strange, coz when I give the PC some time and
wait for it to finish and then try again it doesn't seem all that slow...??
Have I pulled any handbrakes anywhere??
I couldn't find any interesting outputs into log files, so I have no more
infos to offer you...
Thanks for help!
Sven B.
PS: Please could you also CC to my Mail-Account
------------------------------
From: "Fong's" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ��ݯ}�X��{�Ѥ�-�M�~�� V 2.0 - "�W�����ѱ��y��" ��k !!!
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 05:19:20 +0800
Hello!!
�X��{�Ѥ�!!???
�A ���w�˫�Ĥ@������X��{�Ѥ��ɡA �����������@����m�ե���A �~��}�l��
�ΡC
��}���r!!????
HELP !!!!!
���ߵo�]!! �U�ƳӷN!!
Fong's
------------------------------
From: Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: 26 Feb 1999 19:02:52 -0500
d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u (David Fox) writes:
> "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Doug wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >Can a PCI modem be used in linux?
> >
> > Zzzzz.... *snort* Wha...?
> >
> > Why in the world would you need a 60+MHz parallel bus to talk to a device
> > pumping bits serially at less than 60kHz?
>
> Because there's a sound card and an old ethernet card in my ISA slots...
Well, actually the ethernet card would do better with a PCI slot than
the modem...
--
Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Internet Telephony
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 23:02:22 GMT
In article <7b325t$b93$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dear Mr. Zhang Lei,
I noted your request on the Deja News Chat Network dated 1999/02/21.
I work for a company call Wi-LAN Inc. in Calgary, Canada. We are a
manufacturer and developer of wireless technology and products. Our Ethernet
Bridges are applicable for VoIP applications; should you need further
information of our company and our products please visit our website at:
www.wi- lan.com. If you can email me with you email address( I tried the one
listed but not working) I will enclose the attachment of a writeup of VoIP
technology and how our products apply to such application to you.( PDF
format) Hope this will help.
Regards,
Mike
Account Manager, China/Hong Kong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Sir:
> I am fond of the technology-Voice over IP.
> I would like to make my linuxbox as a Internet telephony gateway.Does anyone
> know any cards or software which can do such work?
> Is there somebody doing research on VoIP of Linux?
> Tell me some valuable research websites.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Zhang lei
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: telnet troubles
Date: 28 Feb 1999 00:00:42 GMT
I am having trouble telnetting to one of my Linux boxes. It accepts the
connection, but I never get a login prompt. Any ideas?
James Ranson Homepage: www.cs.uregina.ca/~ranson/
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 1:140/234.2
E Pluribus Modem
Net-Tamer V 1.08 - Test Drive
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bj�rn Griese)
Subject: Problems with DNS & Firewall
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 23:06:37 GMT
Hi everybody!
I'm just getting started in setting up my own firewall at home to get
a little more secure ;-) But this isn't so easy as I thought :-(
My biggest Problem ist the DNS traffic. Everytime I activate the
script, my whole DNS traffic is just thrown away by the packet
filtering system :-((
Has anybody a solution that would suit to my problem?
I'm using Linuxkernel 2.0.36 & the ipfwadm tool
--- CUT ---
#!/bin/sh
#
# Variabeln
FW_IP=$1
#
ipfwadm -I -p deny
ipfwadm -I -f
ipfwadm -O -p deny
ipfwadm -O -f
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -f
#
#
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W lo -S any/0
ipfwadm -O -a accept -W lo -D any/0
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W eth0 -S any/0
ipfwadm -O -a accept -W eth0 -D any/0
#
ipfwadm -I -a deny -W ippp0 -P tcp -D $FW_IP 1:1023
ipfwadm -O -a deny -W ippp0 -P tcp -S $FW_IP 1:1023
ipfwadm -I -a deny -W ippp0 -P udp -D $FW_IP 1:1023
ipfwadm -O -a deny -W ippp0 -P udp -S $FW_IP 1:1023
#
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W ippp0 -P udp -D $FW_IP domain nameserver 51
ipfwadm -O -a accept -W ippp0 -P udp -S $FW_IP domain nameserver 51
#
ipfwadm -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp \
-S 192.168.1.0/24 \
-D 192.168.1.0/24
ipfwadm -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp \
-D 192.168.1.0/24 \
-S 192.168.1.0/24
#
# ftp
#
ipfwadm -I -a accept -k -P tcp -S any/0 ftp \
-D $FW_IP 1024:65535
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -S $FW_IP 1024:65535 \
-D any/0 ftp
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -S any/0 ftp-data \
-D $FW_IP 1024:65535
ipfwadm -O -a accept -k -P tcp -S $FW_IP 1024:65535 \
-D any/0 ftp-data
#
# tcp ports
# - telnet www domain nameserver
#
ipfwadm -I -a accept -k -P udp \
-S any/0 ssh \
-D $FW_IP 1024:65535
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P udp \
-S $FW_IP 1024:65535 \
-D any/0 ssh
ipfwadm -I -a accept -k -P tcp \
-S any/0 telnet www pop3 nntp smtp ssh \
-D $FW_IP 1024:65535
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp \
-S $FW_IP 1024:65535 \
-D any/0 telnet www pop3 nntp smtp ssh
#
# ports f�r Nameserver
# - dns
#
#ipfwadm -I -a accept -k -P tcp -S 193.196.32.1 domain nameserver \
# -D $FW_IP
#ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -S $FW_IP \
# -D 193.196.32.1 domain nameserver
ipfwadm -I -a accept -k -P udp -S any/0 domain \
-D $FW_IP domain
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P udp -S $FW_IP domain \
-D any/0 domain
#
#
ipfwadm -I -p accept
ipfwadm -O -p accept
#
#
ipfwadm -A in -a -W ippp0 -P tcp -D $FW_IP www
ipfwadm -A out -a -W ippp0 -P tcp -S $FW_IP www
--- CUT ---
THNX for every reply ;-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Batten)
Subject: rcp does not work?
Date: 27 Feb 1999 00:08:29 GMT
Hello,
I have installed redhat 5.2. I am having a problem getting rcp to work. When I
rcp small files (from a remote machine), the transfer works. With larger files
I get a timed out message. When I use FTP large files download in a flash. Is
rcp that much slower? What do I need to change?
Thanks
Jeff
------------------------------
From: Tom Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.software,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,cino,is,ns-windows.nt
Subject: Re: Cannot get to LILO boot: anymore
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:02:27 -0800
Dean Plude wrote:
>
> Michelle Xu Zhao wrote:
>
> > Hi, I installed a scanner software/drivers and rebooted
> > and found that the computer hang at printing the 'LILO boot:'
> > prompt. It will print 'LI' then hang forever.
> >
> > I used to have winnt on partition 1 and linux on partition 4
> > and run them selectively via the 'LILO boot:' manager.
> >
> > Now the boot manager seemed damaged by the scanner installation.
> >
> > And I cannot boot either of the two OS since I cannot get to
> > the prompt.
> >
> > The question is: How do I go fixing the boot manager and get
> > back the prompt? (get over the hang)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Michelle
>
> Boot from rescue and then type lilo But be warned you scanner software
> had a virus on it
Make sure your bios is still set up properly. I had the same problem
when windows wrote to the bios and changed the number of sectors to a
block. Lilo does a relative offset in sectors to find the higher parts
of LILO. My Linux disk was formated with 4K per node so I had to set 8
sectors per block in the bios. The bios setting must match the node
size you used for ext2.
Tom
--
=== Tom Oswald = mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = (360)817-8484 ===
Imaging Division Sharp Labs
Camas, WA, 97223
Standard Disclaimers Apply, including:
"Any ideas or opinions expressed here do not necessarily
reflect the ideas or opinions of my employer." :^)
===================================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
