Linux-Networking Digest #340, Volume #11         Sun, 30 May 99 22:13:32 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Linux server and Windows client ? (Karel Bemelmans)
  Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's.  Can it be done? (Peter Schurr)
  Re: text edit in Linux ("Gerald R. Jensen")
  Re: PPP - cannot resolve remote IP (Clifford Kite)
  Re: 10Base2 & UTP ("Chris Hailes")
  Re: text edit in Linux (Karel Bemelmans)
  Re: YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound (AG)
  ftp problem (Simon Gouder)
  ftp problem (Simon Gouder)
  Re: What are drawbacks to using an ISA NIC? (Frank Sweetser)
  Re: Samba PLEASE POST YOUR smb.conf!! (Gilford Wimbley)
  Re: Req: Samba configuration help.... (dlwright)
  Telnet is painfully slow (Eugene Strulyov)
  Samba Help ("Juan Carlos")
  Re: Mars NWE slow ? ("William J. Forde")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Karel Bemelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux server and Windows client ?
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:26:09 +0200



benjamin wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> i want to network two PCs: one linux server and one win98 client.
> The linux server is connected to the internet via an ethernet
> cable-modem.
> 
> ISP -----Modem
>                    Linux server
>                     NIC --------------HUB
>                                                              Win98
> client

All you need is in the IP-Masquerading mini HOWTO. It's 30 minutes work
at most (if you have to recompile your kernel) Check /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini
for the file.

Karel

-- 
 
 Karel Bemelmans, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hq.narfum.org/~corn/

 "There's no fish in the water."

------------------------------

From: Peter Schurr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Hiding a class C between two real class C's.  Can it be done?
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 16:39:26 +1000

It's assumed that you would be using these two links for outbound sessions only.
That is, you don't want any internal hosts within your 10.0.0.0 net to be
referenced by external sites. if so there would be the issue of DNS or just
'which address do I use' for getting back into your net.

Another option for you is something I did up in Folsom CA. That company took a
UUNet /24, and had two connections to two different UUNet POPs. They ran BGP to
the provider - the customer was assigned a private ASN - and UUNet took care of
redundancy between the two POPs. Single Provider, but otherwise it was a good
redundant scenario. More and more, portability will be discouraged, unless you
can get your own real network.

peter

>


------------------------------

From: "Gerald R. Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: text edit in Linux
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 17:31:59 -0500

If you have the standard Red Hat 5.2, you should have joe (Joe's Own
Editor).

joe is fast & easy ... for help, it is CTRL-K/H


Douglas Linton wrote in message ...
>I am trying to have x start automatically by editing the /etc/inittab in
Red
>Hat 5.2 but being new to Linux I can't figure out how you edit files, hoew
>do I start an editor and where is it found. I world appreciate any
>assistance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Thanks
>
>



------------------------------

From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP - cannot resolve remote IP
Date: 30 May 1999 17:36:09 -0500

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: My ISP does not supply the remote IP on the PPP connection. What options
: does I have to set to accept 0.0.0.0 as remote IP.

None to accept 0.0.0.0 but using a reserved address should work.  For
example with the pppd option

  :192.168.0.1

the IP address 192.168.0.1 should be accepted by the remote as one that
you can use as it's address.

--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com>                       Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
 * citizens. */

------------------------------

From: "Chris Hailes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 10Base2 & UTP
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 08:35:46 +1000

There are devices called tranceivers that connect to MUA (DB15) on the
Ethernet
nic.   You need MUA to 10 BaseT . Have your netcards go MUA connectors?
You might pick up some tranceivers surplus

Rob van der Putten wrote in message <7hpgf1$v2q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi there
>
>
>Darrin Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if you can, using a proper matching transformer or
>> balun, use one UTP as a substitue for 10Base2 coax?
>
>Since an ethernet signal contains a a DC component you can't use
>transformers unless you combine them with DC restoration cirquitry.
>Furthermore UTP uses separate twisted pairs for TX and RX.
>
>You could build a UTP <-> converter, but buying a small hub would probably
>be cheaper.
>
>You can find out more about ethernet from the relevant IC datasheets.
>
>
>Regards,
>Rob
>--
>+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>|              http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html               |
>+------------------------------------------------------------------------+



------------------------------

From: Karel Bemelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: text edit in Linux
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:22:22 +0200



Douglas Linton wrote:
> 
> I am trying to have x start automatically by editing the /etc/inittab in Red
> Hat 5.2 but being new to Linux I can't figure out how you edit files, hoew
> do I start an editor and where is it found. I world appreciate any
> assistance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks

Well, the editor I most of the time use is "pico". It's simple and gets
the job done. If you need something more advanced, try "vi" or "emacs".

Karel

-- 
 
 Karel Bemelmans, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://hq.narfum.org/~corn/

 "There's no fish in the water."

------------------------------

From: AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 19:20:18 -0400

Sounds like you don't have a valid YP/NIS domain name.

You can set your hostname in /etc/yp.conf , this file sets your NIS domain.
I'm not sure what your setup is but typically, NIS will work w/ these two
components:

ypclient and ypserv ->  I suspect that your clients are windoze boxes and your
ypserv is the Linux box running SUSE..

If this is correct, you'll have to make sure that you've got ypserv running on
the SUSE box.
at the shell prompt do a "ps aux|grep yp" -- w/o the ""

If ypserv is running , it should look something like this :

[green@mechrs1 green]$ ps aux|grep yp
green    31933  0.0  0.3   836   348  p3 S    19:09   0:00 grep yp
root     13033  0.0  0.1   840   128  ?  S   Mar 29   0:00 (ypbind)
root     13034  0.0  0.3   944   356  ?  S   Mar 29   0:00 ypbind (slave)
root     22354  0.0  3.1  3360  2968  ?  S   May  7   1:13 ypserv
root     22366  0.0  0.4   928   460  ?  S   May  7   0:00 rpc.ypxfrd
root     22377  0.0  0.4   952   396  ?  S   May  7   0:00 rpc.yppasswdd -D

Next -> If your running NT 4.0 , you'll have to check the "c:\var\yp\binding"
directory and make sure your ypserver name is in the directory.

I highly recommend that you take a look at the YP/NIS How-To.
You can find it @ http://www.linux.com

Good luck..



Bernhard Pohl wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm using Suse Linux 6.1 on to PCs connected through 2 3Com 509x cards.
> Linux works on both of them and the network is also fine, since ping works
> fine.
>
> I'm relatively new to Linux, so I still fight with the installation of all
> the nice features of Linux ;-) .
> Yesterday I wanted to set up NIS and I did everything as it is described in
> the Suse Handbook. No problem so far.
>
> After rebooting both PCs, NIS did not work- the only thing I got was the
> message "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not found".
>
> Please help me out and tell me what's wrong- and _please_ set the detail
> level of your answer a little bit higher than usual, because - as I said -
> I'm relatively new to unix.
>
> ------------------
>
> # File: NewsgroupAnswer.conf
> #
> # Sets the detail level for Answers in Newsgroups
> #
> #
>
> NewsGroupAnswerDetailLevel = high
>
> ------------------
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>  Bernhard

--

Alfred
________________________________________________

 FAMU-FSU COE ASME Webmaster
 http://www.eng.fsu.edu/~green
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________




------------------------------

From: Simon Gouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp problem
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:09:34 +0200


==============A794DC0AF5E1B5F42E3E7E17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I have a small network consisting of 2 Windows 98 machines and 1
Red Hat
Linux machine (5.1).

My problem is that I cannot use the ftp service between the Windows
machine and the Linux box.
However I can ping to and from all machines and can also telnet from the
W98 machines to the Linux.
The /etc/services file is all right as specified int the HOW TOs
literature.

I have looked into the /var/log/secure file and found the following
message :

     in.ftpd[631]: error : cannot execute /usr/sbin/in.ftpd : No such
file or directory.

Please note that the ftp package is installed, however I cannot find the
above file.

Can somebody help me,

Simon





==============A794DC0AF5E1B5F42E3E7E17
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Hi,
<p>I have a small network consisting of 2 Windows 98 machines and 1
<br>Red Hat
<br>Linux machine (5.1).
<p>My problem is that I cannot use the ftp service between the Windows
machine and the Linux box.
<br>However I can ping to and from all machines and can also telnet from
the W98 machines to the Linux.
<br>The /etc/services file is all right as specified int the HOW TOs literature.
<p>I have looked into the /var/log/secure file and found the following
message :
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <i><font size=+1>in.ftpd[631]: error : cannot
execute /usr/sbin/in.ftpd : No such file or directory.</font></i>
<p>Please note that the ftp package is installed, however I cannot find
the above file.
<p>Can somebody help me,
<p>Simon
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;</html>

==============A794DC0AF5E1B5F42E3E7E17==


------------------------------

From: Simon Gouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp problem
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:32:53 +0200

Hi,

I have a small network consisting of 2 Windows 98 machines and 1
Red Hat
Linux machine (5.1).

My problem is that I cannot use the ftp service between the
Windows
machine and the Linux box.
However I can ping to and from all machines and can also telnet
from the
W98 machines to the Linux.
The /etc/services file is all right as specified int the HOW TOs
literature.

I have looked into the /var/log/secure file and found the
following
message :

     in.ftpd[631]: error : cannot execute /usr/sbin/in.ftpd : No
such
file or directory.

Please note that the ftp package is installed, however I cannot
find the
above file.

Can somebody help me,

Simon




------------------------------

From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: What are drawbacks to using an ISA NIC?
Date: 30 May 1999 18:43:36 -0400

"Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I discovered (by trying to use it) that the last unused PCI slot in my 
> system is defective.  This forced me to add an ISA NIC (a 3Com 3C509B) 
> instead of the PCI device I had planned on.
> 
> The ISA NIC is working well.  I wonder, though, what the drawbacks are 
> compared to a PCI NIC.  This device is just attached to a cable modem, 
> which suggests that it will never be called upon to move more than 
> 3MB/second anyway.
> 
> Is interrupt latency higher with an ISA NIC?  Increased CPU use?  The
> initial install involves more work because you have to specify the IRQ and
> I/O port address range.  Now that the installation is done, though, I'm
> interested in runtime gotchas.

the biggest gain is it's a 32bit bus, vs the 16bit ISA bus.  it's also a
nice feature that the PCI bios managed resources (I/O ranges, IRQs) and
provides a nice, easy, safe way to get at 'em.  i *think* the PCI bios can
also help move data around w/less work from the host CPU, at least on
bus-mastering cards, but if it's just hooked up to a cable modem you'll
probably never even max out the ISA bandwidth.

-- 
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net  | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.5        i586 | at public servers
`When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at
you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*".'
(By Linus Torvalds)

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: Samba PLEASE POST YOUR smb.conf!!
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:55:51 GMT

Thank you Nicholas Couchman!  You weren't even trying to help me but
you did.  I have been having problems because my windows machines
can't access my samba machine, even though it appears in their network
neighborhoods.  I have made various adjustments to smb.conf, but the
one that did it was copying your case sensitivity options.  Thank you!

On Sat, 29 May 1999 03:49:52 GMT, Nicholas E Couchman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>--------------B1E37EDA76F53245F1CF3A39
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>My smb.conf should be attached.  You should also be able to configure Samba
>through linuxconf, but here is the conf file.
>
>Matt Goebel wrote:
>
>> I'm really tired of hunting for answers on how to setup samba, nothing
[snip]
>> peoples smb.conf would help a lot (If you aren't using NT)  Thanks
>
>--------------B1E37EDA76F53245F1CF3A39
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> name="smb.conf"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="smb.conf"
>
>; The global setting for a RedHat default install
>; smbd re-reads this file regularly, but if in doubt stop and restart it:
>; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb stop
>; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start
>;======================= Global Settings =====================================
>[global]
>
>; workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4
>   workgroup = NECN
>
[snip]
>; Options for handling file name case sensitivity and / or preservation
>; Case Sensitivity breaks many WfW and Win95 apps
>;   case sensitive = yes
>    short preserve case = yes
>    preserve case = yes
>

I have been desperately trying to get my windows boxes to access my
linux machine.  I changed my case options to what you have here, and
*POOF* everything started working just like it was supposed to.  Thank
you so much.

>; Security and file integrity related options
>   lock directory = /var/lock/samba
>   locking = yes
>   strict locking = yes
>;   fake oplocks = yes
>   share modes = yes
[snip]


regards,
GW


------------------------------

From: dlwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Req: Samba configuration help....
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 19:01:35 -0700

I am currently trying to get samba installed too.   www.samba.org has a
"Diagnosing Samba"
document with 8 troubleshooting tests that I found useful. You can get it at

                 http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/DIAGNOSIS.html

If you haven't already read this it might help.

lp

brett

> I am fairly new to Linux, and not having much luck. Perhaps someone can
> suggest where I am going wrong.
>
> Here are my computer configurations:
>
> Computer Number 1
> Name:khaoz
> OS : Windows NT Workstation SP5
> IP : 192.168.0.50 Mask 255.255.255.0
> Workgroup : WORLD
>
> Computer Number 2
> Name: raven
> OS : Windows 98
> IP : 192.168.0.60 Mask 255.255.255.0
> Workgroup : WORLD
>
> Computer Number 3
> Name : primate
> OS : Redhat 6.0
> IP: 192.168.0.55 Mask 255.255.255.0
>
> All that I want to do is to share two directories on my Linux box. One must
> be available to everyone, the other must only be available to the user
> bretts with the password d3b0rchary.
>
> I tried getting this to work with slackware for ages and the a friend
> suggested I installed Redhat. I installed Redhat 6.0 from the CD and chose
> to install everything. I ensured the samba was started.
>
> I created an account called bretts by typing useradd bretts and then
> assigned him the password d3b0rchary. I also created an account called
> pcguest by typing useradd pcguest and didn't assign it a password.
>
> I created a directory /user/private. Made bretts owner and changed to mode
> to 750.
>
> I then created a /etc/smb.conf file as follows
>
> [global]
>     workgroup=world
>     printing = bsd
>    printcap name = /etc/printcap
>    load printers = yes
>    guest account = pcguest
>     security=user
>    log file = /var/log/log.%m
>    lock directory = /var/locks
>    share modes = yes
>
> [homes]
>    comment = Home Directories
>    browseable = no
>    read only = no
>    create mode = 0750
>
> [public]
> comment = Temporary file space
> path = /tmp
> read only = yes
> public = yes
>
> [private]
>    comment = Fred's Service
>    path = /usr/private
>    valid users = bretts
>    public = no
>    writable = yes
>    printable = no
>
> AT this point I restarted the Samba and tried to connect. I log into my
> Windows NT or windows 98 machines using bretts and d3b0rchary. I am able to
> see my primate in my browse lists but when I connect, I am promped to login.
> Access is always denied.
>
> What am I overlooking ?Am I creating my guest account correctly.


------------------------------

From: Eugene Strulyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet is painfully slow
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:59:09 GMT

Hi everybody

I just recently installed SuSE 6.1 on my workstation. Everything works
ok except for telnet. When I try to telnet to another Linux box on the
local network it crawls. It takes several seconds for a character to
appear on the screen after I type it. 

Other computers on the same network don't have this problem. I also
tried telnet'ing while running windows on my machine -- no problems
either. This leads me to the conclusion that there's some kind of
misconfiguration on my SuSE box.

My workstation is:
Cyrix 6x86-PR200
64Mb RAM
6 gig HD
PCI ne2000 clone network card
SuSE 6.1 / kernel 2.2.5 (custom compiled)

The other Linux box is: (the gateway)
AMD 486dx4-100
32Mb RAM
1.2 gig HD
2 PCI ne2000 clone network cards
Debian 2.1 / kernel 2.2.9 (custom compiled)

The network is coax (10base2)
The Debian box is used to share a cable modem across the LAN. 
As I said, everything works except for telnet -- it is slow to the point
of being unusable. And it only happens to my machine when it's running
Linux and I'm trying to telnet to the Debian box. Interestingly enough,
if I telnet to an outside host, bypassing the gateway, it works fine.

I am puzzled by this problem. Any ideas how I might fix it?

thanks,

Eugene

P.S. please reply by mail if you can: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "Juan Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Help
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 19:08:31 -0700

I am not an expert, but I managed to get an ethernet card each in my win98
and linux machines, and am able to see linux from win98, and actually edit
files as root, using the MS "net use" command.  When I ftp or telnet with my
modem disconnected, the modem dials out.  When I ftp with the modem
connected, it connects and then says connection closed by host.  When I
telnet, it won't recognize my root password.

Below are the relevant parameters of smb.conf.

I'd be grateful for any help!!!


[global]
   workgroup = WORKGROUP
   server string = hpwin
   printcap name = /etc/printcap
   load printers = yes
   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
   max log size = 50
   security = user
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY
   domain master = yes
   domain logons = yes
   dns proxy = no
[homes]
   comment = Home Directories
   browseable = no
   writable = yes
 [netlogon]
   comment = Network Logon Service
   path = /home/netlogon
   guest ok = yes
   writable = no
   share modes = yes
[printers]
   comment = All Printers
   path = /var/spool/samba
   browseable = no
   guest ok = no
   writable = no
   printable = yes




------------------------------

From: "William J. Forde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mars NWE slow ?
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 01:29:26 GMT

If you can, I would run SAMBA instead.  I started use NWE, but
discovered SAMBA to be atleast 4 times faster.

Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:

> Mars NWE as a Novell server seems about
> 3 times slower than a real Novell server.
>
> is this normal ? How could I optimize it ?
>
> TIA, Wolfgang


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to