Linux-Networking Digest #431, Volume #11 Sun, 6 Jun 99 16:13:37 EDT
Contents:
Re: Sendmail configuration (Raj Rijhwani)
Re: DIALD building problems with RH5.2 (Gilford Wimbley)
Linux and BIOS (Mike Kerr)
Re: PPP hangs on '+++' characters, RH5.1, kernel 2.0.36 (Rob van der Putten)
Level Domains DNS qestion. Help badly needed. (Denis)
Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp (Bev)
Re: Ethernet is gone after compiling 2.2.9 (Tobias Anderberg)
frage zu samba-ras server (Tobias Burhenne)
Re: Before I screw up the internet.... (norman elliott)
Re: help - we're going berzerk! IP addresses for peers?! (Lim Chee Onn)
Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Jensen)
Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel? (bryan)
Problems with Dual-homed DE500 and RH6.0 ("Hervey Wilson")
PPPIOCUNIT, Operation not permitted on Redhat 6.0 (eric)
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: Linux and BIOS (Scott Gruby)
Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Jensen)
Re: ISDN under SUSE 6.0 (Bernd Huebenett)
Re: Sendmail configuration ("Cliff")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raj Rijhwani)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Sendmail configuration
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 99 14:26:27 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "FreeLorn" writes:
> I'm not sure if it is a problem at my end or at the other end, but
> occasionally when I send an email to someone, I get a bounce reply of
> 551 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...we do not relay.
> Could anyone point me in the right direction as to solving this problem?
If you mean you get a bounce message from your own box (which admittedly
seems most likely, given that you're asking here), then I don't know the
answer. Perhaps you're running named, and one of your local machines
is missing from your local reverse lookup?
But just in case that's not what you mean, and in fact you're getting
the "relay" errors from the remote site, it means that mail routing
to the recipient goes through a machine that either a) doesn't
recognise itself as the correct receiving host for the mail, or
b) isn't properly configured to relay the mail on to another
machine that does. If that's the case, it is entirely outside your
control, and you should query the error with the postmaster of the
offending machine in the first instance (which may be more difficult
that it first appears, beacause odds are 50/50 that the machine
won't recognise itself as the receiving host for the postmaster
account either).
--
Raj Rijhwani (umtsb5/16) | This is the voice of the Mysterons...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ... We know that you can hear us Earthmen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Lieutenant Green: Launch all Angels!"
http://www.courtfld.demon.co.uk/raj/ (demon, and gods, willing...)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilford Wimbley)
Subject: Re: DIALD building problems with RH5.2
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 17:59:54 GMT
On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 23:48:15 -0400, Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Gilford,
>I am having all sorts of problems building diald. Think you could save me a few
>days and tell me how to apply the patch? Readme files included with most of
>these Linux apps are pathetic. They assume that everybody is a C++ programmer
>and has nothing better to do than to sit around and debug code. I started 'installing'
>diald a few days ago and have gotten nowhere. The readme file says something
>about the Makefile matching the config.h file or something similar but upon looking
>for similar looking lines of code I found nothing. Also, I have heard mentioned
>'getting
>everything in place' before compiling. Am I supposed to create directories and move
>file before doing a 'Make'? I didn't see anything about it in the readme file.
>
>Thanks
>Brian
>
>Gilford Wimbley wrote:
[blah, blah, blah]>
>> regards,
>> GW
>>
>> ps, the patch has to be applied to a pristine copy of 0.16, so if you
>> don't have a pristine version of the source, still, you might need to
>> download it again.
>>
If I remember right, I just uncompressed the tared zipped 0.16 in
/usr/src/diald-0.16. Then I put the patch file there in that
directory. Then I typed:
% patch diald-patch-0_16_5
Then I think I just typed make. I may have a faulty memory on this
one, but I'm pretty sure that is what I did.
I didn't figure this out by reading the documentation on patch. I
have found that doing searches on dejanews.com and in linux web sites
like redhat.com answers a lot of these questions. And that way, you
can find answers without waiting 3 or 4 days for some jerk like me to
respond to your posting. ;-)
You probably have already figured it out or given up by now!
regards,
GW
------------------------------
From: Mike Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and BIOS
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 13:58:24 -0400
I want to try to get into my BIOS to disable Plug and Play(I think it's
screwing up my network card).
Does anybody know how to do this?
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP hangs on '+++' characters, RH5.1, kernel 2.0.36
Date: 6 Jun 1999 19:27:17 +0200
Hi there
Duncan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <stuff snipped> Try RTFMing your modem manual. +++ is a naguc sequence
> that lets you give the modem a command while connected and yes, some
> modems get confused. This is usually called a bug :-)
You could disable the esq char and use a DTR toggle to bring the modem
back to command mode.
Regards,
Rob
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Rob van der Putten, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Level Domains DNS qestion. Help badly needed.
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 13:21:29 -0400
Hi, I'm stuck here.
I started having problems connecting to one of my account at Duke.
it is an ACPUB account, ac opposed to EGR account that is working.
I give their names here so you can understand the following output.
I read DNS HOWTO and used nslookup command to find out the following:
[root@localhost denis]# nslookup
Default Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
> me1.egr.duke.edu
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
Name: me1.egr.duke.edu
Address: 152.16.101.1
> godzilla.acpub.duke.edu
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
*** dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu can't find godzilla.acpub.duke.edu: Non-existent
host/domain
> teer14.acpub.duke.edu
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
*** dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu can't find teer14.acpub.duke.edu: Non-existent host/domain
Address: 152.3.250.1
> set q=ns
> duke.edu.
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
duke.edu nameserver = dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
duke.edu nameserver = dukedns2.netcom.duke.edu
duke.edu nameserver = dukedns3.netcom.duke.edu
dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu internet address = 152.3.250.1
dukedns2.netcom.duke.edu internet address = 152.3.250.2
dukedns3.netcom.duke.edu internet address = 128.109.131.40
> acpub.duke.edu.
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
*** dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu can't find acpub.duke.edu.: No response from server
> egr.duke.edu.
Server: dukedns1.netcom.duke.edu
Address: 152.3.250.1
egr.duke.edu nameserver = dukedns3.netcom.duke.edu
egr.duke.edu nameserver = dukedns2.netcom.duke.edu
egr.duke.edu nameserver = ee.duke.edu
dukedns3.netcom.duke.edu internet address = 128.109.131.40
dukedns2.netcom.duke.edu internet address = 152.3.250.2
ee.duke.edu internet address = 152.3.17.193
>
as you can see I can access my EGR account because the DNS server can
find egr.duke.edu. At the same time I can not access my ACPUB account
because DNS can't find acpub.duke.edu. Some people suggested that I ask
Duke network people about that, but I think there's no need becasue
from win95 I CAn access my ACPUB acount - so there's something wrong
here on my Linux system, that I can't find yet. To me all the files
that I looked at while reading DNS-HOWTO look fine, but I might be
wrong. Any ideas where these beast sits?
Thanks a lot
PS. I know the IP address of say godzilla.acpub.duke.edu (from above),
so I telneted it with telent 152.3.233.44 and it works, too
------------------------------
From: Bev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: can't connect to my isp using kppp
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 10:28:20 -0700
Melle wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i've got a problem with my RH5.2 distribution of linux! i configured kppp
> the way it was shown in several comp-magazines for logging in at my isp's
> server using PAP - but it doesn't work at all.
> the modem dials properly, but it fails to log in. my isp said that my login,
> password and servername should be added to the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets,
> but i don't know how in detail. there are two lines of introduction: the
> format of an entry should be something like:
> client server secrets IP adresses
> but what does this mean? i'm not good in English at all (you may have
> noticed that already *grin*) since i'm from Germany, hmm.
> if you know the answer to my problem please mail me to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> thanx, Melle
We could never get it to work under RH either, so we just copied over the
files from our slackware installation. Here is what the /etc/ppp/pap-secrets
file should look like:
# Secrets for authentication using PAP...
# client server secret IP addresses
"yourloginname" * "yourpassword"
--
Cheers,
Bev
====================================================================
"We thought of one of those discount store caskets, but, frankly, we
were worried about the quality." -- mortuary commercial
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Anderberg)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Ethernet is gone after compiling 2.2.9
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 17:41:27 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have 3c90x pci card that was working fine uner 2.0.36-0.7 and -3 but
>then again -3 is done with rpms so its really a no brainer.
[...]
>error is(at boot): eth0 unknown interface
Do you have support for it in the kernel?
/tobias
------------------------------
From: Tobias Burhenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: frage zu samba-ras server
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 20:30:10 +0200
Hallo zusammen :-)
Ich hab da ein wenig Probleme mit Samba. Ich will ein Laufwerk eines Window
Clients (am Ethernet) an einem Client sichtbar zu machen( und umgekehrt), der
�ber einen Dial-In Server (linux mit samba) per Modem oder ISDN -Verbindung am
LAN angeschlossen ist?
Ich hab es soweit geschafft, da� die Rechernamen in der Netzwerkumgebung beider
Clients zu sehen waren, wenn ich aber daraufklicke bekomme ich nur eine
Fehlermeldung.
win95
RECHNER A ----eth0----LINUXSAMBA------modem--RECHNERB
win98
W�re nett wenn jemand mir da weiter helfen k�nnte (vieleicht auch per direkter
mail)
Tobias
------------------------------
From: norman elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Before I screw up the internet....
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 18:42:32 +0000
"Christopher R. Barry" wrote:
> "George Georgakis" <linuxstart.com@geegee> writes:
>
> > OK, you've got the wrong idea :)
> >
> > Most likely people didn't respond to your query because it has been
> > answered thousands of times in the past. Doing some simple reading would
> > have got you the answer anyway.
>
> Before I posted here, I fetched 4000 articles for this site off of my
> news server. There was no FAQ among them. There was no answer to my
> question among them. I can't find anything in dejanews about this. If
> it's been answered thousands of times in the past, please give me one
> article ID that points to the answer. As for "simple reading"; what
> documents do you recommend? Everything I've seen says something like
>
> This document is for you if:
>
> 1. You are connecting your machine to an existing IP network.
> 2. You are creating a stand-alone network, never to be connected to
> the internet.
>
> This isn't my situation (which I think is a common one; this shouldn't
> be so difficult).
>
> > Simply put: Your ppp0 link uses a different network address to your eth0
> > interface. It's your eth0 which has the 192.168.0.1 address. When you
> > connect to your ISP, they "force" a specific internet-useable address to
> > your machine at the end of the _ppp0_ link.
> >
> > Check it out - when you're connected to your ISP, type "ifconfig" to see
> > your interface configurations. Then try ifconfig again with ppp not
> > connected.
>
> They both look exactly the same, except when I'm connected the ppp0
> device is listed, and when I'm not only the lo and eth0 devices are
> listed. Now what is wrong with this? I can ping the 192.168.0.2
> machine from my Linux box (192.168.0.1), and use the internet from my
> Linux box at the same time.
>
> My /etc/init.d/network looks like
>
> #! /bin/sh
> ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> route add -net 127.0.0.0
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
> route add default gw dev ppp0
>
> As far as I can tell from reading the NET-3 HOWTO and Linux Network
> Administrator's Guide, I've done everything right.
>
> Christopher
As was explained in an earlier reply ( to you ) your ppp0 interface is the
one to your ISP
The /24 addresses ( what used to be called class C addresses ) that are for
"hobbiest" use
would not work on the internet. Routers would just throw packets with those
addresses away.
As was stated, your ISP will give you a temporary valid IP address while you
are connected to
them. It will be bound to the ppp0 interface. That is through your
modem/serial line. IP masquerading
on the PC with this connection will route packets between your other PC's and
the internet.
best wishes,
norm
------------------------------
From: Lim Chee Onn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help - we're going berzerk! IP addresses for peers?!
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 19:56:47 +0800
rocket girl wrote:
>
> Somehow, both of you guys skipped right over the answer to my question. Is
> a hosts file of any kind REQUIRED or not? You are suggesting that I set up
> a WINS server - which would require IP addresses to be assigned to each
> client. B-z-z-z-z-z!!!! That is exactly what I am trying to avoid - using
> a hosts or lmhosts file. All we want to do is emulate a workgroup in
> windows - where all we have to do is specify a workgroup name and a machine
> name.
>
> Thanks again.
>
That would not work as NETBeui is a M$ propriertary protocol. To use
Linux with Windows workstations, you need to enable TCP/IP on the M$
workstations. Linux uses TCP/IP to communicate (rather it's NetBios over
TCP/IP) hence the need to provide the /etc/lmhosts file or to set up a
WINS server.
If it's any consolation, it seems that Microsoft is going to standardise
on TCP/IP as the default transport protocol in Win-2000.
Cheers.
--
=====================================================================
Passengers of the mothership earth, these are your children speaking.
When disembarking, please leave a good clean environment behind.
Thank you.
=====================================================================
Alex C. O. Lim
Future Trend Computer Services
http://www.ftrend.com.my
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.design.product,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 20:35:35 +0200
Craig Mitracs wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> does anybody know a distributor who sells PC rackmount computers - in a
> really good design?
>
> I am browsing the web for that since a few days - and found nothing yet...
> The only Rack Computers that look really good are "real" computers (SGI,
> SUN) ...
>
> Thanks from Germany -
>
> Craig
Depends what you like (what is really good design) ?
Anyway, you may try this site as well:
http://www.icpacquire.com.tw
jorn
------------------------------
From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 16:21:29 GMT
In comp.os.linux.development.system Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
: [bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
: > irix has an ifconfig switch to set speed and duplex. why doesn't
: > linux?
: > even if its not acceptable to some kernel folks, at least 2 people
: > think this is the right place for it (ifconfig).. ;-)
I got email from a developer and he said that this feature is
in-progress! so others do agree that ifconfig is the right
card-neutral place for interface config options.
--
Bryan
------------------------------
From: "Hervey Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Dual-homed DE500 and RH6.0
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 11:20:04 -0700
I upgraded my server to RH6 from 5.1 a couple of weeks ago and experienced
some problems with my network interfaces - two DE500 (Tulip) cards. The
symptoms were that eth1 (the card wired to the internet) would go down after
a short period of time and stop receiving packets. eth0 was fine all the
time. I didn't find the cause of the problem - no messages anywhere that I
could find - and have had to revert back to 5.1.
Has anyone had any similar problems ?
Hervey.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (eric)
Subject: PPPIOCUNIT, Operation not permitted on Redhat 6.0
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 18:25:19 GMT
Hi,all,
I have recently installed Redhat linux 6.0 and was able to
successfully configure ppp to connect to my ISP. Everything was
working fine. But after I recompiled my kernel ( to enable transparent
proxy ) I'm getting "PPPIOCUNIT, Operation not permitted" error right
after the modem connected to the ISP and the connection was dropped.
Anyone knows anything about this ?
thanks,
Eric
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
Date: 6 Jun 1999 16:17:28 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Detlef Bosau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> abgetrennte Netzchen, da kann das Zeuch hemmungslos rumsauen, das
> stoert mich nicht.
Hmm... nun ja, wenn ein Grossteil deiner User MS Anwender ist, dann stoert
es diese schon wenn dein NetBios Netzwerk nicht tut. Aber das musst du
selber wissen was dir wichtiger ist :)
Gruss
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Scott Gruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and BIOS
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 12:03:41 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to try to get into my BIOS to disable Plug and Play(I think it's
> screwing up my network card).
> Does anybody know how to do this?
>
Sure. When your machine boots up, hit delete (or whatever combination to
invoke your bios setup), select the option that says Plug and Play Aware
OS and choose Off. (This is an option on my AMIBIOS, under
Advanced->Plug and Play Setup->Plug and Play Aware O/S.)
Since you didn't specify the BIOS you're using, it makes it difficult
for someone to give you instructions on this.
--
Scott Gruby
Advanced Ideas
<http://www.advancedideas.com/>
(Please post replies to this newsgroup. Email replies will be discarded.)
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.design.product,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 20:36:24 +0200
Craig Mitracs wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> does anybody know a distributor who sells PC rackmount computers - in a
> really good design?
>
> I am browsing the web for that since a few days - and found nothing yet...
> The only Rack Computers that look really good are "real" computers (SGI,
> SUN) ...
>
> Thanks from Germany -
>
> Craig
Depends what you like (what is really good design) ?
Anyway, you may try this site as well:
http://www.icpacquire.com.tw
jorn
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 22:03:49 +0200
From: Bernd Huebenett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISDN under SUSE 6.0
Hello Dave,
is the configuration under Yast successfull ??
Can you reach the Suse test server ??
Dave Peeters wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> Can anybody help me getting a connection up and running under linux Suse 6.0
> using a AVM Fritz/pci ISDN adapter. I have tried the usual ISDN howto's
> mailed to AVM, mailed to my ISP. Until now nothing works. I don't get any
> errormessages etc. I just can't seem to get a connection.
> A URL with some good information would also be very helpful
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Sendmail configuration
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 20:12:02 GMT
The error message says that the host _receiving_ the mail does not
recognize the host _sending_ the mail to some, possibly third, host. This
is usually caused by a configuration problem with an email client. If you
are the sender of the mail that gets bounced then how is the email client
configured? Specifically, do you send your mail to your ISP's mail server
for forwarding to the intended recipient or do you send directly? If the
former is true then your ISP needs to add you as a valid relay host. If the
later is true then the problem could be on the receiver's ISP end. If the
receiver is a virtual host and the receiver's ISP is set up to accept mail
for it then the ISP may be thinking that you are attempting to relay off
that ISP. This type of problem is the virtual host ISP's configuration
error. Nothing that you can do except complain.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
FreeLorn wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm not sure if it is a problem at my end or at the other end, but
>occasionally when I send an email to someone, I get a bounce reply of
>551 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...we do not relay.
>
>The top of my sendmail.cf is as follows:
>
>##################
># local info #
>##################
>
>Cwlocalhost
># file containing names of hosts for which we receive email
>Fw/etc/sendmail.cw
>
># my official domain name
># ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically determine your
>domain
>#Dj$w.Foo.COM
>
>
>CP.
>
># "Smart" relay host (may be null)
>DSpost.demon.co.uk
>
># place to which unknown users should be forwarded
>#Kuser user -m -a<>
>#DLname_of_luser_relay
>
># operators that cannot be in local usernames (i.e., network indicators)
>
>CO @ % !
>
># a class with just dot (for identifying canonical names)
>C..
>
># a class with just a left bracket (for identifying domain literals)
>C[[
>
># who I send unqualified names to (null means deliver locally)
>DR
>
># who gets all local email traffic ($R has precedence for unqualified
>names)
>DH
>
># dequoting map
>Kdequote dequote
>
># class E: names that should be exposed as from this host, even if we
>masquerade
># class L: names that should be delivered locally, even if we have a
>relay
># class M: domains that should be converted to $M
>#CL root
>CE root
>
># who I masquerade as (null for no masquerading) (see also $=M)
>DMarlen.demon.co.uk
>
>
>My sendmail.cw is as follows:
>
># sendmail.cw - include all aliases for your machine here.
>steldin.shadows.org
>arlen.demon.co.uk
>
>Where steldin is a machine that connects to the net via my linux box and
>arlen.demon.co.uk is the external hostname of my linux box and
>brightwood is the internal name.
>
>Could anyone point me in the right direction as to solving this problem?
>
>Rob
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
