Linux-Networking Digest #431, Volume #12 Tue, 31 Aug 99 21:13:46 EDT
Contents:
Re: VMware - wow! (Spike!)
Re: Network Address Translation (bill davidsen)
SS7 ?? ("Destroyer")
Linux as router. (R. Christopher Harshman)
Re: '/sbin/ifdown ppp0' Not Working: Mandrake 6.0 (jsrockford)
Re: Samba - newbie ("Tobias Knowles")
Can't access telnet or ftp server from win98 box (john)
Re: HOW DO I TRY THIS ROUTER OUT? DATACO ISO 8473 router...no docs..see pics in
message... (0/1) ("Tobias Knowles")
Re: samba setup problem ("Tobias Knowles")
Re: Distributions (Bob Martin)
Re: Route Table questions... ("Tobias Knowles")
Re: Distributions (Bob Martin)
IPX Router (Dan)
suse-bootdisk ("Stephan M. Ott // OKDesign oHG")
Re: how do i connect 2 networks? (Jerry Craker)
Re: PPP auto-dial on Netscape startup? (Paul Carver)
wrong network interface used for routing (BM Lam)
anon-ftp (Speedy Fast)
Re: eth0: tulip.o: init_module: device or resource busy ("kamie")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Spike! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: VMware - wow!
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:07:27 +0100
And verily, didst Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> eloquently scribe:
>>I think the inter-process communication between these forks is done rather
>>cleverly with the QL network emulation... This means all the virtual QLs can
>>talk to each other using the standard SuperBASIC interpreter...
>>
>>(could be wrong though)
>>
>>Just thought I'd mention it because it seems to be a similar thing to what
>>you were talking about.
> While I was generally aware of the existance of a QL emulator, I was
> not familiar with that; it sure sounds a lot like what I was
> describing.
> The killer question, of course, is whether or not people are writing
> code for Virtual QL instances running atop Linux... :-)
Well... The QL is still being supported by a dedicated band of followers...
Some even commercial, and anything that could make use of the network could
be made to work on multiple instances of the emulator...
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "THIS IS THE VOICE OF THE MYSTERONS......" |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | "I'm afraid no-one's in at the moment, but if |
| in | you leave your rank and colour, we'll destroy |
| Computer Science | you as soon as we get back..."- The Preventers|
==============================================================================
|GCv3.12 GCS>$ d-(dpu) s+/- a C++ US++ P L/L+ E-- W+ N++ o+ K PS+ w-- M+/++ |
|PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ X+/X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D+ G e++ h/h+ !r!| Space for hire |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: Network Address Translation
Date: 31 Aug 1999 21:35:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Zuheir Bahalul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I am trying to define my Linux machine to be a Network Address
| Translator, instead of masquerading, as i want to computers behind the
| gateway to be accessable to the world (through that "gateway"), but i
| didn't find any application, or way to do that.
|
| (i want all addresses coming from my inner net- 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0
| to be translated outside the gateway to 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0, as
| the machines on the outer net does not recognize my gateway machine as
| their gateway...)
I have this horrible feeling you don't understand how this works...
If you have many additional IP addresses, you use them as is, not
assign non-routable addresses to the machine and then try to NAT them to
the legitimate IP addresses when they reach the net. Unless you're into
doing thing the hard way as a learning experience.
If you don't have legitimate IP addresses, doing NAT to use some which
belong to someone else will (a) not work because the ISP will block
them, and (b) will probably trigger all sorts of spoofing alarms
resulting in loss of service.
Your ISP should be routing all valid IP addresses to your firewall
machine, and if that's not happening then the problem can only be solved
by your ISP. If you don't have multiple IP addresses, then NAT won't
help, you must use masquerade.
And 192.168... addresses will not be routed one bit better then 10...
in general.
Forgive me if you know what you're talking about and just masqueraded
as someone fumbling in the dark;-)
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
"So let it be written, so let it be dumb." Pharaoh Dufus the last...
------------------------------
From: "Destroyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SS7 ??
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:55:59 +1000
Hi,
Does anyone know if a SS7 protocol stack exists for linux ? If it does,
where will I be able to find it ?
Cheers.
------------------------------
From: R. Christopher Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux as router.
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 20:37:56 GMT
I've got a box with two NICs in it that I'm trying to set up as a
router. One NIC is assigned 192.168.0.150, and is connected to
the downstairs LAN. The other is assigned 192.168.3.1 and should
be the gateway for the 3rd floor. I'm running a basically stock
Debian 2.1 (Kernel 2.0.36, recompiled). The box is called 'jump-gate'
The third floor boxen can access jump-gate (ssh and http), and
jump-gate can get to the Internet (192.168.0.1 is hooked into a
DSL feed downstairs, and is running IP Masq'ing). But the third
floor boxen cannot get to the Internet through jump-gate. (I've set
up Apache w/ Proxy on jump-gate as a temporary stopgap.)
The relevant information is as follows:
jump-point:~# ifconfig -a
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:95:00:27:3D
inet addr:192.168.3.1 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2371 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2685 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6500
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:95:00:27:35
inet addr:192.168.0.150 Bcast:192.168.0.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8652 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5627 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:1
Interrupt:15 Base address:0x6600
jump-point:~# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
eth1
jump-point:~# cat /proc/ksyms | grep "ip_forward"
0014186c ip_forward
001eb02c sysctl_ip_forward
Any thoughts? Many thanks in advance!
- Chris
--
R. Christopher Harshman http://ebhon.jnst.uor.edu/~harshman
Going for a B.S. : "Information Systems and Media Production" (JNST-UOR)
Celeron 300a | i440BX | Mystique 220 + RRStudio | SB Live! | Win98
PIII-450 | i440BX-2 | Fusion AGP 3Dfx Banshee | Yamaha PCI | Linux / NT
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: jsrockford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: '/sbin/ifdown ppp0' Not Working: Mandrake 6.0
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:17:53 GMT
Found the answer...ppp is broken in Mandrake 6.0; needed to download the
update.
In article <7qei2m$3c8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
jsrockford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody having this problem? Any fix?
>
> I did a clean install (orig. RH 5.2 system); created the PPP0
connection
> from the network configurator in the 'control-panel'....will logon on
> fine w/ '/sbin/ifup ppp0' but will not shutdown the connection...this
> system worked fine with RH 5.2 ....exact same setup for hardware and
> configuration settings. Best I can determine is the /etc/ppp/if-down
> script has a problem finding the correct device. I'm using 'killall
> -INT pppd 2>/dev/null' to break connection now but would really like
to
> know WHY it isn't working as it is supposed to. Thanks!
>
> [I originally tried to upgrade the 5.2 system but had same problem so
> decided for a clean install of Mandrake 6.0--Again, my old setup ran
> fine for many, many months w/o a hitch]
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba - newbie
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:59 -0700
Why the need for NetBEUI?
Tobias Knowles
Mark Worsdall wrote in message ...
>In article <wWPt3.45$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Butler
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>I am trying to set up Samba to be a printer server for my windows 98
>>computer.
>>I have linux redhat 6.0 on a serperate computer.
>>I have network cards and a cable
>>I have never ever setup a network before, between computers.
>>I know nothing at all about setting up networks.
>>I have indeed read a great deal of documentation about setting up samba,
but
>>i dont understand a great deal of the words used in the instructions.
>>I have my printer set up under linux.
>>
>>Please help with details for a mega newbie if you can :)
>>
>>
>>
>
>Win98 machine
>1) Make sure you have the Netbieu & TCP/IP protocols installed for your
>ethernet card (Don't assume cos you see them that they are bind to you
>net card they might be for the DUN)
>
>2) Under TCP/IP Ethernet give it an IP address (10.0.1.10) with a
>netmask of 255.255.0.0
>(Don't bother with dns & other things yet)
>
>3) Makesure under indentification your workgroup is set (Home) and you
>have a name for the computer (satan) set.
>
>3a) Use MS client logon and use the user name that you normally log in
>with (NOT root) onto your Linux box) i.e. jarven (should have su super
>user status)
>
>4) ensure you are using plaintext passwords, so run the w95 .reg file
>found with the samba docs.
>
>5) Decide whether you are going to make samba an NT server or just a
>shared file system (We assume shared)
>
>Linux
>1) Make sure you have set the IP address (10.0.1.254) with a netmask of
>255.255.0.0
>
>2) /etc/Hostname has an entry for the name of the machine, say dogbreath
>
>3) /etc/hosts has entry's like:-
>127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
>10.0.1.254 dogbreath dogbreath.jarven.org.com
>
>4) Edit the smb.conf file:-
>
> workgroup = Home
> server string = Samba Server V%v running on %h
> hosts allow = 10. 127.
> guest account = ftp
> admin users = jarven
> security = share
> password level = 8
> local master = yes
> os level = 33
> domain master = yes
> preferred master = yes
> preserve case = yes
> short preserve case = yes
>
>Under Share section
>
>[root]
> comment = Enter Dogbreaths's root
> browseable = yes
> writable = yes
> path = /
>
>
>5) Start up samba say:-
>
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/samba start
>
>6) make sure it is up by doing a:-
>
>ps ax|more
>
>you are looking for entry's like:-
>
> 330 ? S 0:00 smbd -D
> 339 ? S 0:00 nmbd -D
> 651 ? S 0:01 smbd -D
>
>This means it is working, but is it working correctly? so check the logs
>in /var/log
>
>
>Now start satan and see if you can see dogbreath in net neighby and when
>it asks for a password use jarven's password.
>
>Your on your own for printing:-(
>
>Ofcourse I recommend the samba for NT domain logon since dogbreath will
>keep your roving profile safe and sound, something that satan will at
>some point not do for you.
>
>M
>
>--
>Mark Worsdall - Oh no, I've run out of underpants :(
>Home:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wizdom.org.uk
>Shadow:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shadow.org.uk
>Work:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hinwick.demon.co.uk
>Web site Monitoring:- http://www.shadow.org.uk/SiteSight/
>
------------------------------
From: john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't access telnet or ftp server from win98 box
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 20:28:46 GMT
Hello,
I've just set up a brand new TCP/IP private network. As of now it only
consists of one Linux box running RH5.2 and one Windows machine
(Win98). After some trial and tribulation (especially wi the win98
box) I've managed to be able to ping either host from the other, and
download web pages from the win98 box off of the httpd running on the
Linux machine. I want to be able to telnet and ftp to the Linux from
the win box but trying to do so results in the following error messages:
Telnet on the win98 box says: "Connection to host lost"
Ftp on the win98 box says: "Connected to bla.bla.bla" <about 5
seconds pass> "Connection closed by remote host."
Telneting and ftping the Linux box from the Linux box is not a problem.
Could this be related to /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny? I have
them set to ALL:LOCAL and ALL:ALL respectively.
Thanks to anyone that might be able to "throw me a bone."
John
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HOW DO I TRY THIS ROUTER OUT? DATACO ISO 8473 router...no docs..see pics
in message... (0/1)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:27:42 -0700
1488 is generally a quad line transmitter.
1489 being the receiver.
Both are for RS-232 specs.
I'd hook a terminal to a port and try it out!
user wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi
>
>I wanna try this out. Already have home network of 7 pc's. 5 Win 95, 1
>NT, 1 Linux box. I have no idea how to connect this. Unit has 2 db15
>and one db25 (serial port? has 1488,1489 chips on board near
>connector)...tcp-ip works fine on all pc's...just wanna try this
>out....
>
>Please help
>Please reply by e-mail...
>Thanks for reading
>Claude
>
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba setup problem
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:50:35 -0700
Kind of hard to tell without your smb.conf but the -N is for NULL
password...
Then again I would'nt know how you have things set up.
Tobias Knowles
David Polinsky wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am unable to get past step 3 in DIAGNOSIS.txt.
>testparm returns no errors.
>I can ping linux to win95 and win95 to linux.
>I can ftp to and from the linux box with ftp program on w95 box.
>I can, sometimes, get swat to work.
>
>When I type
>smbclient -L 'hostname' -N [where 'hostname' is the name I can use to
>ping from one machine to another]
>I get:
>Added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
>session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password
>pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.)
>
>The interface information is correct.
>What's wrong? What do I need to do to get this to work?
>smbd is version 2.0.5a
>kernel is 2.2.10
>
>If I need to post the output of testparm, I will, but I was trying to
>save download time for you.
>
------------------------------
From: Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Distributions
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:36:45 +0000
root wrote:
>
> I've been using RedHat for about 3 months now, and I really like the
> whole linux thing. What I'm looking for though, is maybe a distrabution
> that's not quite so easy to set up. I'd really like to get my hands
> dirty, buckle down, and see what kind of problems I can encounter by
> using a distribution that's not quite so user friendly.
> Any sugestions?
> Thaks,
> David
The real way to do it is forget the distros. Before there were
distributions you got the basic boot/root disk which linus posted, then
setup your drives. then obtain whatever you wanted from avaialble
sources and tried to compile them. basically rolled your own system
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Route Table questions...
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:46:23 -0700
You dont mean IPX I hope.
Tim Mead wrote in message <7q9476$g9n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have recently installed RH 5.2. I need a little help with the route set
up
>so my win95 clients can see the internet. I am able to connect to my ISP
and
>surf from my server, but the clients can only see the web pages on the
>server. I have name server information set up in my clients under IPX
>protocol. I think the packets are just not being routed out, or being
>received back.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Distributions
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:37:32 +0000
root wrote:
>
> I've been using RedHat for about 3 months now, and I really like the
> whole linux thing. What I'm looking for though, is maybe a distrabution
> that's not quite so easy to set up. I'd really like to get my hands
> dirty, buckle down, and see what kind of problems I can encounter by
> using a distribution that's not quite so user friendly.
> Any sugestions?
> Thaks,
> David
The real way to do it is forget the distros. Before there were
distributions you got the basic boot/root disk which linus posted, then
setup your drives. then obtain whatever you wanted from avaialble
sources and tried to compile them. basically rolled your own system.
Slackware is probably closest to that flavor, but still to easy.
------------------------------
From: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general,redhat.general
Subject: IPX Router
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:31:07 GMT
I have a computer that needs to act as an IPX router. It has the folowing
interfaces
TR0
ETH0
ETH1
I have the folowing in my
ipx1:3:once:ipx_interface add -p tr0 802.2 a0200
ipx2:3:once:ipx_interface add eth0 802.2 4326634
1px3:3:once:ipx_interface add eth1 802.2 4343675
ipx4:3:once:/usr/sbin/ipxd -d
eth0 and eth1 are routing ipx to eacher other.
In the windows networking they can see on NT server on the network but can
not comunicate with it.
The novell guy at work told me the out ipx node for the tokenring is a0400.
I have no clue...
Thanks for your help.
Dan
PS. All interface so pass tcp/ip and do work....
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Stephan M. Ott // OKDesign oHG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: suse-bootdisk
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 01:23:58 +0200
Hi folks.
sorry if being off-topic, but can anyone tell me how to re-create an
original bootdisk for suse-linux ?
not taking care i destroyed the original bootdisk. I know there is a way to
create a new one but canīt remember how to do it.
any help would be greatly appreciated.
tia
-- stephan
------------------------------
From: Jerry Craker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how do i connect 2 networks?
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:41:04 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a couple of questions. Are these simply 2 machines that need to talk
to each other? If that is the case, simply put a 2nd nic in each. Or ar these
2 networks that need to talk to each other.? Actually, that is the same
answer, but you need to enable routing on the machines and set the routes on
the rest of the machines in the network to route through the correct machine.
-- Jerry --
Tiberio, David wrote:
> while the reference you directed me to seems like it has
> a lot of information, I still do not understand what to
> do.
>
> I have 2 networks, via 2 different dsl providers. I want the
> machines to communicate to each other without having to
> go out on the internet.
>
> should I be building a bridge? or a router? or a gateway?
> can I just put 2 nics in each machine, one for each network?
> someone told me just to put one nic in each machine and
> link them to a switch, and put both lines into the switch,
> but obviously that didn't work.
>
> these questions are not answered clearly by that document.
>
> so what do i have to build?
>
> I think I have a gateway working but I can't seem to route
> traffic through it.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >See The Linux Network Administrator's Guide, Chapter 5,
> "Configuring
> >TCP/IP Network"
> >
> >http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/index.html#guide
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Carver)
Subject: Re: PPP auto-dial on Netscape startup?
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 03:57:25 GMT
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:11:18 +0200, Markus Holzfeind
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm sure this has been asked before, but I couldn't find it in the
>> > HOWTO. I am wondering how to configure my system to automatically dial
>> > PPP when TCP/IP request is made to a network outside my home. I have a
>>
>> You would be looking for whats on this page http://diald.unix.ch/
>
>or - an easier way - enable the demand option of pppd
>(man pppd)
I set up ppp using netcfg. Do you know where pppd is actually called
from when it's configured from netcfg?
------------------------------
From: BM Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Subject: wrong network interface used for routing
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:03:42 +0200
I just set up Red Hat Linux 5.2 on a PC.
The machine has a modem and PPP connection has been configured.
The machine is hooked up to a ethernet LAN
Below is some output from the system:
# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
193.158.131.205 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1524 0 0
ppp0
223.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 193.158.131.205 0.0.0.0 UG 1524 0 0
ppp0
# traceroute 194.25.2.225
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 223.255.255.253 @
eth0
As you see, the trouble is when I want to go the the internet via the
ppp interface, the system somehow decides to use eth0, which goes to the
private LAN.
Can some one help me out there?
If eth0 is disabled, then accessing the internet is no problem. But this
is not an acceptable fix.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Speedy Fast)
Subject: anon-ftp
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:08:38 GMT
I am having problems giving upload access to anonymous FTP. I checked
all my permissions on my directory. In fact I got so frustrated i
just opened up the whole ftp directory with the intent in changing
everything back.
But I having problems giving upload access to my anonymous ftp users.
I uninstalled and reinstalled the RPM with no luck. I have read the
man pages but with no luck.
What am i missing?
------------------------------
From: "kamie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0: tulip.o: init_module: device or resource busy
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:12:27 GMT
What type of network card are you trying to use the tulip driver with? You
might need to get the latest tulip.c and recompile the driver. I had the
same error until i downloaded the latest source from
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux
good luck
--kamie
> Robert Inskeep wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I try 'modprobe tulip.o' and I receive the message
> >'init_module: device or resource busy'.
> >
> >
> >Additionally - when booting...in 'messages'
> >Aug 31 06:15:39 localhost insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/net/tulip.o:
> >init_module: Device or resource busy
> >Aug 31 06:15:39 localhost ifup: Delaying eth0 initialization.
> >Aug 31 06:15:39 localhost network: Bringing up interface eth0 failed
> >
> >What does this mean? Where do I go from here?
> >
> >Robert Inskeep
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
