Linux-Networking Digest #484, Volume #11 Thu, 10 Jun 99 15:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: Time corrupted using Samba ("Alan J. Wylie")
Samba as NT domain controller ("Knut A. Nilsen")
How do I keep Telnet from Stomping on the term type... ("Clint Byrum")
Re: Time corrupted using Samba ("C.E.O.")
Re: I'm Sooooo Close (Dann Church)
Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied Error? (Soeren Kalesse)
another Mars question - problem (root)
Re: Samba: Only one Win95...Net Neighborhood: Update (Nicholas E Couchman)
Re: How to create RPM Package (Villy Kruse)
Re: Basic setup? What do I need ? (Johan Kullstam)
Re: X-Win32, Crack Code ?? (Thomas Mussnig)
linux <--> win98 via network (Andrew King)
Please recommend a good patch panel brand and place to purchase! (FenderAXE)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Alan J. Wylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Time corrupted using Samba
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:44:31 +0100
Thomann KH wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I use Suse Linux 6.1 combined with an NT 4.0-Server.
> I can print and mount the directory of the NTserver.
> The problem is that all file and directory dates seen from Linux on the
> NT-server are
> completly nonsense, and alle files I write from Linux to the server get
> a date that is nonsense
> seen from NT too.
> I know that this worked on Samba 1.9X, but since we updated to Samba
> 2.0.3-13, this problem occured.
>
> I hope there is someone out who can help me, because I found nothing
> about this in
> the net, and I tried !!
>
> Any help would be greatly appreceated!
This from today's Linux Weekly News:
http://lwn.net/1999/0610/dists.phtml
<quote>
Red Hat
Do not use the stock Red Hat 6.0 kernels with smbfs if you
are mounting shares from Windows NT, 98, or2000 servers.
This message from Michael Warfield explains why:
the stock kernel has been built with a compile
option that causes smbfs to only work with Windows 95
servers. All others will see corruption in the file
timestamps. If you are running Red Hat 6.0 on a network
with Windows servers, you will probably need to build
and install your own kernel.
</quote>
Cold Suse have the same problem?
------------------------------
From: "Knut A. Nilsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba as NT domain controller
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:15:03 +0200
I am testing samba (2.0.4) as domain controller for a small NT network.
Generally it works nicely; users can log on to NT workstations using their
unix username and password, the NT 'profile' is copied and stored on the
server etc.
However, administering user and group permissions seems to be unsupported
(or undocumented). My problem is that I want one (roamng) user to be local
administrator (member of the NT group \\BUILTIN\Administrator) on any
workstation. This is supposedly possible using the 'local group map' option
in smb.conf, but this only works with the last code update, and when
upgrading to that, ugly things start happening with the user profiles (there
are evidently other changes that affects the way profiles are handled...?).
Has anyone been able to actually achieve this? Is there another way of
enabling local administrator rights to a romaing user?
Thanks in advance
Knut Nilsen
(remove the word 'spam' in my e-mail address if replying by mail).
------------------------------
From: "Clint Byrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I keep Telnet from Stomping on the term type...
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:12:16 -0700
I have a need to pass a bogus term type to telnet, that it will pass on when
given an ENQ. The telnet server that I'm connecting to does not support
ENVIRON, so it must obtain the term from telnet. If the value in TERM is not
a valid termtype for the client system, telnet reports 'unknown' as the
type. Any ideas short of creating the bogus termcap/terminfo entries?
------------------------------
Reply-To: "C.E.O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "C.E.O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Time corrupted using Samba
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:52:58 -0500
goto http://www.lwn.net/1999/0610/a/rh-smbfs.html
Thomann KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "C.E.O." wrote:
>
> > kht:
> > the dates even come up if doing a "dir" in NT. not only are wrong in NT
but
> > different from what samba show.
>
> I found that dates which are ok in NT (using dir) are wrong in Linux using
> smbmount,
> but are correct using ls in smbclient !!
>
> >
> >
> > i will continue looking at it and let you know if i found something
(please
> > do the same).
>
> Shure !!
>
> > I can not build because make guest all confused due to the
> > wrong dates...
> >
> > I already sent an email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > CEO
> >
> >
>
> Yes, please let me know if you get a solution for this.
> Perhaps it's a bug in smbmount ??
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> I Karl-Heinz Thomann I
> I Feingeraetebau Tritschler GmbH I
> I Schoenaustrasse 10-12 I
> I D - 79725 Laufenburg I
> I T: 07763 9388 0 I
> I F: 07763 9388 49 I
> -------------------------------------
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Dann Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I'm Sooooo Close
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 22:01:28 -0600
Actually, from the errors it looks like there is a problem adding an
appropriate route entry (SIOCADDRouTe). My guess is that the route that it's
having a problem adding is the default gateway route. Double check your
ifcfg-eth0 file to make sure that the gateway address is valid and on the same
subnet.
Also, you can try adding this route in by hand:
route add -net 0.0.0.0 gw <ip address of gateway> metric 1
If this give the "network unreachable," then you probably don't have a local
subnet route. Check the output of netstat -rn for a route that looks like the
first part of your ip address with a .0 at the end. If that doesn't exist, try
adding it by hand:
route add -net x.x.x.0 gw x.x.x.a metric 0
(where x.x.x.0 is your local subnet and x.x.x.a is your interfaces ip
address). If that works, go back and run the route command to add the default
gateway.
If these work, then you need to check the startup scripts to find out what they
are doing differently from above. If these don't, you might check that the ISP
gave you good numbers.
Good luck!
--Dann Church
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > eth0:3c509 at 0c300 tag 1 10 baseT port, address 00 0a 24 0d 68 69 IRQ
> 10.
> > ---> I assume this means linux has identified my network card
> > ---> and has assigned it to device eth0. (These settings
> > ---> jive with the DOS config program - Plug-in-Pray disabled)
>
> This is a good first step ;-).
>
> > The next two lines are the killers:
> >
> > SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
> > SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
>
> This is a bit weird. The first error message, when printed by boot files,
> indicates that someone is trying to perform an operation not relevant to
> the target device. This is often someone trying to assign network paramets
> using ifconfig to a loopback device. The best way to fund this is to less
> out your /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 (/etc/init.d/network if you have SysV init) and
> type each command at the console and see what commands give these errors.
> If that doesn't help you, posting which commands fail could help someone
> else recognize a problem.
>
> Ross
> --
> GPF: Windows is unable to provide a .sig
------------------------------
From: Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux 6.1 & PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied Error?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:08:26 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Fellow (UK) Linux Users
>
> Has anyone out there in the UK gotten SuSE 6.1 Linux
> to connect to the Internet using ordinary DUN?
>
> I recently upgraded my old Slackware machine to
> use SuSE 6.1 and cannot get pppd to work.
> I can dial into the Demon Internet ROMP line, the modem
> dials in fine. I get a good connection the but as soon
> as `pppd' starts I get PPPIOCGUNIT Permission denied
> errors in the `/var/log/messages' and then the demaon
> exits.
>
> I am using ppp 2.3.5 and kernel 2.2.5 as the default
> supplied with SuSE Linux 6.1. I verified the permissions
> of the `/usr/sbin/pppd'. It is most definitely `suid'
> and I checked also that `ppp' support is compiled
> in the kernel. I am using root user to do the
> connection but still get an error. I checked
> that the `/dev/ttyS2' (COM3) is also a root
> read/writable, and also symbolically linked `/dev/modem'
> to `/dev/ttyS2'. So I figure that it must be something
> to do with `pppd' program.
> In any case what us a PPPIOCGUNIT anyway?
>
> Does anyone have a good summary or crib sheet
> about making an Internet connection with SuSE Linux?
> The old demon site Slackware documentation is old
> and less useful.
> `ftp://ftp.demon.net/pub/unix/linux/Demon/slack3.0.help.tgz'
>
> Thanks
>
> Pete Pete
> on windoze95 partition \-C "Waah baby cryin"
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
hi,
The things You need to runn pppd and chat correctly are
the permissions to write on the followinmg files
/etc/suseppp/provider.chat
/etc/suseppp/provider.options
/etc/suseppp/pap-secrets
The problem is that when You change the permissions manually
and You start SuSEConfig afterwards it will
change the permissions back to root.
Try to make Your own directory /etc/ppp/*
so taht SuSEConfig doesn't change it anymore
and change Your dialup and hangup scripts to the new directory
that's the way i experienced the problem.
I hope I helped You at least a bit.
MfG
soeren
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: another Mars question - problem
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 21:35:41 -0600
Here's one! if anyone knows I would appreciate it very much.
I have Mar-nwe configured and running on RedHat 6.0
My Novell 4.11 service patch 6 sees linux fine (ie display server)
My Windows95 workstations can see see the mars server and even log in!!
But the linux box can't see the novell server or any other ncp device
(ie jet direct card)
or even itself.
Hence I can not use the novell print q's
Any ideas?
BTW
I know I can print directly to jet direct card via IP I need to use the
Novell Q's
Thanks again
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba: Only one Win95...Net Neighborhood: Update
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 04:09:27 GMT
It sounds to me like the problem is on the Linux/Samba end. You might check to
make sure both computers are registered w/ Linux (/etc/hosts; /etc/lmhosts)
--Nick
mikes wrote:
> OK Folks, here's a little update, but first, many "Thanks" to all of you for
> your helpful suggestions. :)
>
> Greg, what you suggested works well. I have a little inconsistancy though,
> and wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that computer A has
> internet access presently (still working on my firewall) and thus more
> protocols, etc. than computer B.
>
> Here's what happens when I restart both computers:
> Computer A doesnt prompt for a password for Windows login.
> Computer A does prompt for a Samba password, but doesnt remember it, even
> when saving is checked.
>
> Computer B does prompt for a password for Windows login, and wont let me see
> the SMB server until I login properly.
> Computer B doesn't prompt for a Samba password, and lets me access the SMB
> server without hesitation.
>
> I have deleted my .pwl files on both machines, and rebuilt new .pwl files,
> but still get the same results.
>
> Both computers now show Computer A, Computer B, and the SMB Server in the
> Network Neighborhood. And when I open the Server from Computer A or B, I see
> only their respective directories on the server, and nothing else (good). I
> have yet to make a shared directory on the SMB server, but the simple things
> first. Also, note that computers A and B both have a single folder on their
> drives that are shared, but no permissions have been given to any users.
> This is a "leftover" from my Windows Net Neighborhood prior to my Linux
> server (I had simple sharing only then).
>
> My guess is that Computer B is correctly logging in, even though both
> Network Neighborhoods are configured the same, except for the differences
> found in Computer A (Computer A is configured for Internet login to local
> ISP).
>
> Again, thanks in advance, any further help appreciated...
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Wildman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> Date: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 8:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Samba: Only one Win95 machine can access Net Neighborhood
>
> >On the Windoze machines, right-click Network Neighboorhood and select
> >Properties. Choose 'Windows Logon' for Primary Network Connection. Double
> >click the 'Client for Microsoft Networks' component and make sure you have
> not
> >set it to log onto a NT domain. (I assume you don't want to do this.)
> >
> >Click the Identification tab at the top and make sure that your workgroup
> name
> >is the same for all 3 machines.
> >You might also want to set up samba on the server to be the master browser.
> >
> >Hope this helps,
> >Greg.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: How to create RPM Package
Date: 10 Jun 1999 20:00:10 +0200
In article <7jno9r$aed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> I downloaded 'glibc-2.1pre3' from GNU site, now I want to create RPM
>package for this package, I tried 'rpm -tb glibc-2.1pre3.tar.gz' it
>didnt work. Pls any body tell me how to do RPM package.
>
You'll need to create a spec file. A starting point could be to unpack some
of the src.rpm files and see how this is done.
Villy
------------------------------
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Basic setup? What do I need ?
Date: 10 Jun 1999 13:03:59 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook) writes:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 1999 22:22:52 GMT, Lee Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >questionable reviews, like Pump,
> AFAIK, the pump that is shipped with 6.0 only has problems with
> non-standard DHCP servers.
the biggest problem with pump is that there is no way to get it re-run
your firewall configuration script when the dhcp lease runs out and
you get new ip numbers.
having a highly capable operating system like linux and using a
cable-modem 24/7 without some kind of firewall protection is
foolhardy.
my advice is to retreat back to dhcpcd.
--
johan kullstam
------------------------------
From: Thomas Mussnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: X-Win32, Crack Code ??
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 13:18:51 +0200
==============298AA19834CF87D0A2DCBF40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
check this site:
http://www.bofh.net/~koos/warez.html
Think about the words D. Rudder wrotes... ;-)
Fong's schrieb:
> The URL no work!!
> Thanks!!
> Fong's
>
> Andrea Fanfani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:10:36 +0800, Fong's ha scritto:
> > >Do the How to Crack the X-Win32 V.4.12
> > >http://www.starnet.com/product.htm
> > >
> > www.bofh.net/~warez
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1
> > GS/U/CS d- s: a- C++(C+++) UL+++(UO++) P+>P++ L+++ E--- W(W+) N+(N++)
> > o? K? w-- O? M- V- PS++ PE Y PGP++ t 5? X R tv- b+ DI- D----
> > G++>G+++ e++ h-- r- y+
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
Cheers,
Thomas
__________________________________________________________________
STN ATLAS Elektronik GmbH Phone : ++49-(421)-457-4451
Simulation Systems, SGE 2 Fax : ++49-(421)-457-3929
Sebaldsbruecker Heerstr. 235 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-28305 Bremen, Germany
__________________________________________________________________
Why so many People use M$:
"People: Eat Shit ! - Millions of Flys can't be wrong....."
M$: "You changed the position of your Mouse-Pointer, please restart..."
In a world without fences and borders, who needs windows and gates....
==============298AA19834CF87D0A2DCBF40
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
check this site:
<br><a
href="http://www.bofh.net/~koos/warez.html">http://www.bofh.net/~koos/warez.html</a><a
href="http://www.bofh.net/~koos/warez.html"></a>
<p>Think about the words D. Rudder wrotes... ;-)
<br>
<br>
<p>Fong's schrieb:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>The URL no work!!
<br>Thanks!!
<br>Fong's
<p>Andrea Fanfani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<br><a
href="news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>...
<br>> On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:10:36 +0800, Fong's ha scritto:
<br>> >Do the How to Crack the X-Win32 V.4.12
<br>> ><a
href="http://www.starnet.com/product.htm">http://www.starnet.com/product.htm</a>
<br>> >
<br>> www.bofh.net/~warez
<br>>
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> --
<br>> ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
<br>> Version: 3.1
<br>> GS/U/CS d- s: a- C++(C+++) UL+++(UO++) P+>P++ L+++ E--- W(W+)
N+(N++)
<br>> o? K? w-- O? M- V- PS++ PE Y PGP++ t 5? X R tv- b+ DI- D----
<br>> G++>G+++ e++ h-- r- y+
<br>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------</blockquote>
<p>--
<br>Cheers,
<p>Thomas
<p>__________________________________________________________________
<br>STN ATLAS Elektronik GmbH
Phone : ++49-(421)-457-4451
<br>Simulation Systems, SGE
2
Fax : ++49-(421)-457-3929
<br>Sebaldsbruecker Heerstr.
235
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<br>D-28305 Bremen, Germany
<br>__________________________________________________________________
<p>
Why so many People use M$:
<br>"People: Eat Shit ! - Millions of Flys can't be wrong....."
<br>
<p>M$: "You changed the position of your Mouse-Pointer, please restart..."
<br>
<p>In a world without fences and borders, who needs windows and gates....
<br> </html>
==============298AA19834CF87D0A2DCBF40==
------------------------------
From: Andrew King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Andrew King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux <--> win98 via network
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:26:23 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============0EDE2615E5418B1CBF9DEB70
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I realize this may have been answered many times before, so please
forgive any possible redundancy. I'm trying to get my Linux box and a
Win98 laptop to ping one another on a network via a 10/100 ethernet hub,
yet all my config attempts have been exhausted to no avail. Can any of
you who have done this before provide me with the details?
Here's a brief synopsis:
RH Linux 5.1:
eth0: 192.168.2.1 configured and active
/etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 loopback
192.168.2.1 linux-1
192.168.2.2 win98-1
executed: route add default gw 192.168.2.1 eth0
Win98 (laptop):
NIC: 192.168.2.2 configured and active
/windows/hosts.sam
{same as above}
TCP/IP properties for NIC set as follows:
IP address: 192.168.2.2
gateway: 192.168.2.1
Both systems are connected via CAT V twisted pair to a 10 MB/sec hub,
yet neither can ping the other, but each can ping itself (via loopback,
of course). Thanks in advance -
Andy
==============0EDE2615E5418B1CBF9DEB70
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="aking.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Andrew King
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="aking.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:King;Andrew
tel;work:508.303.4276
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.concord.com
org:Concord Communications, Inc.
adr:;;33 Boston Post Road West;Marlboro;MA;01752;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Tactical Engineer
fn:Andrew King
end:vcard
==============0EDE2615E5418B1CBF9DEB70==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FenderAXE)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.networking
Subject: Please recommend a good patch panel brand and place to purchase!
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 04:37:09 GMT
Hi
I'm new to networking and need to buy two 24 port patch panels, but I
know nothing about them. Can you recommend a brand name and a place
to buy them?
Also, I need an inexpensive network rack to hold the patch panel, a
hub, a monitor and a few other things -- nothing huge or expensive,
just good and sturdy. A recommendation on where to purchase a rack
would be terrific.
Thanks!
FA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
