Linux-Networking Digest #893, Volume #11 Wed, 14 Jul 99 13:13:34 EDT
Contents:
NT can't login, can telnet to Linux PC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: dlink + redhat (Chetan Ahuja)
Re: CABLE MODEM, NETWORK, SLOW SERVER??? (Rudolf Potucek)
Re: Dail-On-Demand IP Router with Two WAN Ports - Any Ideas??? (Rudolf Potucek)
Network unreachable on startup only! (S P Arif Sahari Wibowo)
Re: HELP? Linux box sendmail (SMTP) server, and virtual (multiple) domain
QUESTIONS... (Chetan Ahuja)
Re: RH 6.0 & 3C905C TXM Problems (DM)
Ncp client has wrong time (Rob van der Putten)
Re: Scheduled Dial-up PPP occasionally fails ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
chatmud (S P Arif Sahari Wibowo)
Netware 4.1.0 Migratioin Next ("Jason Wilcox")
Linux in NT sever with WINS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Problem to configure the network access ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DSL - cannot ping reliably to home machine (David Kennedy)
Telnet/ftp not working after RH 6.0 install (Edward S Meadows)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT can't login, can telnet to Linux PC
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:15:27 GMT
I'm trying to connect a Linux-Samba PC to an existing LAN. From my
NT-Workstation v4, I can network-browse and find the linux PC. But, when
clicking on the linux PC within the browse window, a prompt appears:
Enter Network Password. I enter a user name and password (that is valid
on the Linux PC) and get an error message: Incorrect password or unknown
username.
However, I can run TELNET on the NT system and connect to the Linux PC.
Then, I can log in using the same username and pw that is rejected while
browsing!
Any ideas why I can't login from NT?
Does a username with mixed upper/lower case matter?
I recently installed Red Hat Linux 5.2 which I think includes Samba
1.98. I've made sure Samba is running and smbclient can see other PCs on
the LAN.
Thanks,
Rick
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chetan Ahuja)
Subject: Re: dlink + redhat
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:30:37 GMT
Well,
If you are using RedHat than linuxconf should be installed for you.
Just use it to enter parameters for eth0 and where it asks "kernel module
to use" just type via-rhine ( without the .o) ( Redhat already has the
via-rhine module in its compiled repository and it can locate it from
its modules directory. If you want to replace it for some reason, just do a
locate on via-rhine.o and replace it with your own compiled file)
If you want to do it by hand, edit /etc/modules.conf ( or conf.modules I
forget at the moment) to add the following line
alias eth0 via-rhine
Then go to /etc/rc.d/sysconfig/network scripts and create a file called
ifcfg-eth0 ( look up ifcfg-lo etc in the same dir for format) You might
also have to edit /etc/rc.d/sysconfig/statricroutes ( or something like that)
to enter routing information.
I think you will be better off with the linuxconf thing.
Chetan
Eyem A. Coward ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: does anyone know how to put the via-rhine.o network interface driver
: module into redhat so that it automatically starts the network at boot
: up?
: the module compiles and runs fine. I ran insmod via-rhine.o just fine
: after bootup
: here's how I get my network to start up
: I wait for boot up.
: then I type "insmod ~/via-rhine.o"
: then I start X
: netcfg and activate eth0 <ipaddress>
: and finally I can telnet, ftp, etc...
:
: anyone know how to get it to start the network at boot?
: I already done the setup to start network, printers, samba, etc...
: this alone will not work, because my d-link def-530tx is not supported
: by the kernel.
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Subject: Re: CABLE MODEM, NETWORK, SLOW SERVER???
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:41:54 GMT
Ever thought of the math? Your cable modem gives you somewhere between 1.5 Mbit
(usually) and 7Mbit (theoretical limit). Since that's going to be the bottleneck
anyhow, I guess I wouldn't worry about it. I am using a 486/33 and that works
fine for me with speeds around 1.5 Mbit, so I guess I have no problems yet.
Just my
$.02
Eric Pearson
(misterp@[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote: : (i would appreciate an email reply also as I may not get back here for a
: while)
: I've got a question (obviously), I'm planning on setting up a network in my
: apartment using a cable modem service and the following:
: P75, 16megs RAM, 2.1Gig HD, running RedHat 5
: K6-2 350, 192megsRAM, 8.4 Gig HD, running WinNT 4.0 but may switch to
: Win98 or 2000 when it's released
: P200 32megs RAM 4.3 Gig HD running Win98, may switch to NT4 or 2000
: 25MHz PS/1 8 megs RAM 250 MB HD running RedHat 5, minimal installation for
: networking
: The Question:
: I have to choose one of these computers to act as the host for the cable
: modem service, and use "IP Masquerading" to share the net connection. Is it
: feasable to use the PS/1 solely for this purpose? (Just tuck it out of the
: way) I know it's a slow ass little thing but I don't know how much work it
: actually has to do just to dish out the connection. The reason is I'd like
: to be able to be working on the other computers, rebooting them and such and
: still have the connection to the others active.
: Is this impossible and will it slow down my connection? What if I use the
: P75? I'd like to avoid using either of the windows machines for this
: because I'm sure you know you have to reboot those bitches alot.
: Thanx, and I'd appreciate an email copy of any responses.
: -Eric pearson
: misterp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Subject: Re: Dail-On-Demand IP Router with Two WAN Ports - Any Ideas???
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:37:35 GMT
Easyly? I don't know what you call easy. I have a RH6.0 box where I set up a
single autodial connection using pppd and that should work equally well for 2
modems:
I my setup I know what the IP address of the router on the ISP end is, so I set
up pppd with the 'demand' and ':<remote-IP>' options added (use netcfg to set up
an ifcfg-ppp0 file and go from there). That way pppd is started on network
staup, but doesn't dial in yet. It then sets a route to the ISP machine and when
any traffic to that address/port arrives it will dial. Setting the 'idle' option
allows to tell how long it will stay up when no more traffic is observed.
This works fine for me (although it took me the better part of 2 days to find out
from where each single script is called) and I see no reason at all, why that
should not work with 2 modems just as well (using ppp0 and ppp1).
Rudolf
Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have been using the MPS mini dial-up router from:
: http://mpsdr.unx.nu/ and I must say that it has served me well
: and reliably for many months. I had two of them, one for a V.90
: modem to my ISP and another to my employer's RAS through an
: ISDN modem. One of the old boxes went belly up and I got to
: thinking there should be a way to combine both into one router box,
: but the details of this are over my head.
: What I would like to do is have my dial-on-demand router dial out
: to my ISP for everything except my employer's RAS which hosts
: a class B range of internet addresses. My employer's RAS acts
: exactly the same as my ISP's RAS.
: My gateway address on my network is 192.168.x.x the class B
: network is B.B.x.x . Any traffic appearing at 192.168.x.x that is
: trying to get to B.B.x.x should cause the router to dial my RAS
: at work via the ISDN modem otherwise it should diap my ISP's
: RAS via the V.90 modem.
: Can this be done easily? I have looked into the Linux Router
: Project's floppy baser router the configuration of which is beyond
: me at this point can anyone help me or at least point me in the
: right direction?
: Thanks,
: Tom
--
------------------------------
From: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Network unreachable on startup only!
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:44:00 -0500
Hi!
I am setting up a machine with RedHat Linux 6.0. The machine have a
network card with Realtek 8139 chip, so I am using rtl8139 driver.
On startup, several commands involving setting up routing gives this
error:
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
However, after the startup process over and I login as root, I can
manually do all the routing command without error.
My machine doesn't use dhcp, so there shouldn't be a problem with that.
Any idea why?
Thanks.
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
_____ _____ _____ _____
/____ /____/ /____/ /____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____/ / / / _____/ http://spas.8m.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chetan Ahuja)
Subject: Re: HELP? Linux box sendmail (SMTP) server, and virtual (multiple) domain
QUESTIONS...
Date: 14 Jul 1999 14:05:12 GMT
Yes sendmail handles SMTP connections. And as far as multi-domain thing is
concerned, you can do multihoming of your network cards ( different IP's
for the same network interface ) So yes, that should take care of the problem.
And the whole thing ( hardware +software) should cost you less than $100 :-)
If you are new to linux, get (buy CD or download ) an easy to install distribution
like Redhat, Suse or Caldera... Read some how'to's etc.. ask questions on
newsgroups if you get stuck. It will be well worth the effort.
Chetan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: hello and TIA for anything at all you can provide.
: ok, here's the honest spiel...
: i am trying to get out of paying the ~$1000 for the email (SMTP)
: server software needed to host virtual domains on my NT server. i
: have been told that i can just run linux and use sendmail. first, is
: this true? if so, then here's my situation...
: i have one NT server and a few Win9x boxes, plus a Linux RH5.2 server
: (with the default server configuration in the RH install - seems to be
: working just fine). here's my problem...
: my background is Windows-specific, i don't know a lot of UNIX or Linux
: commands. i know this may sound like a death wish, but i don't mind
: doing a little reading or research.
: anyone willing to help me, point me in the right direction, tell me
: it's impossible, yadda-yadda -- please respond via email to:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: thanks
--
------------------------------
From: DM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: RH 6.0 & 3C905C TXM Problems
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:26:19 -0700
That's why you either build your own machine, or buy one designed for
Linux!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We just purchased some Dell Dimension machines and they come with the
> 3Com 3C905C TXM NIC cards. RedHat claims that these cards are not
> supported and neither are the Netgear FX310 TX nor the 3C905B TX. They
> claim that the best card to buy is the 3Com 3c595. Unfortunately, I
> can't find this card at our local computer stores.
>
> I tried the Boomerang drivers from
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
> and those don't seem to work either.
>
> This is getting frustrating. After spending $78.00 for "support", I
> don't feel that I'm getting my money's worth.
>
> Any ideas for getting the 3Com 3C905C TXM cards working? When I try to
> do an insmod 3c59x, I get an error message that the "device or resource
> is busy." When I try to specify 3c59x during the install of RH6.0, I
> get an error message that it can't find the card.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ncp client has wrong time
Date: 14 Jul 1999 17:38:27 +0200
Hi there
When I connect to a Novell box or a Linux box with mars-nwe using a
Linux client it shows file creation dates which are 2 hours ahead.
Apearently the Linux client assumes that the file creation/modification
dates are in UTC and translates these times to localtime by adding two
hours.
Suggestions?
Regards,
Rob
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Rob van der Putten, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: Scheduled Dial-up PPP occasionally fails
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:42:20 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dustin Puryear) wrote:
> Sounds like minicom is not getting control of the modem.
>Check if
> there is a /var/lock/LCK..modem or something similar hanging around.
Did that before. Nothing that I can see. I watch the logs,
and it THINKS it's dialing.
> If there is pick up the phone and see if there is a dialtone. Yes?
I can press the voice/data button on the modem and hear the
dialtone start/stop.
> Then ppp might be working but something else is wrong. There isn't?
> ppp isn't letting go of the modem or the modem thinks it has a
> connection, but doesn't.
I don't see any PPP processes running, and I wait for the line
discipline to time out. However, I still have the problem.
I think the modem is in a funny state where it thinks it's connected,
but the system doesn't know it.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: chatmud
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:55:59 -0500
Hi!
I am using a chat server called "Mark Morley's chatMUD" which is an old
program. I cannot find the source anywhere. If you know where to find the
source of this chatMUD, or source of any program doing the same thing (a
chat server, connect from a telnet / MUD client, have rooms, have emote),
would you please let me know?
Thank you.
ps.: I tried MiniHaven - thank you for suggesting - it is feel less
friendly. I might hack it though, if there is no other alternative.
Thanks.
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
_____ _____ _____ _____
/____ /____/ /____/ /____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____/ / / / _____/ http://spas.8m.com/
------------------------------
From: "Jason Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netware 4.1.0 Migratioin Next
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:18:22 -0400
Can any one point to any resources, or give tips, for migrating from Netware
4 to Linux for file and print services
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux in NT sever with WINS
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:06:22 GMT
We are using an NT-Network with DNS and WINS installed on the NT Server.
DNS is only for external names, WINS for the intranet.
Me Linux machine is not able to find any name in the internet.
How can I make it resolve names with the WINS server? The Problem is,
all machines get their IP from a DHCP server so it is "dynamic" and I
can't put all the names into the DNS server!?
Thnx for reply
Tom
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem to configure the network access
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:27:37 GMT
Hello Andrey,
Thank you for your reply, and your help.
In article <7m5lnf$hvn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all WINS (Windows Name Service) is used in Windows networks
> exclusively, and you cannot use it for name resolution in Linux (or
any OS
> other then Windows).
Does it mean, that I cannot access to the local network?
Our network is under NT, and we have all the same WINS(who is also one
of the DNS). My data are stored in the server named "\\FS01\". Could I
reach them with mount or not? I already tried it, and it didn't work!!!
> DNS is used for name resolution in Unix/Linux/Mac world, and file that
you
> need to edit is /etc/resolv.conf, but you don't need to have any
routes
> setup specify to the DNS servers as you have in your example.
>
> If you can include output of 'ifconfig -a', 'netstat -rn' commands and
also
> content of your /etc/resolv.conf file I may be able to help you
further with
> your issue.
Thank you d;)
Here is the output of the command "ifconfig -a":
eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:2E:72:6B
inet addr:149.222.132.130 Bcast:149.222.129.201
Mask:255.255.192.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:26618 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:2137 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
Here is the output of the command "netstat -rn"
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0
eth0
149.222.132.130 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0
eth0
149.222.129.200 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0
eth0
149.222.129.201 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 1500 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
eth0
NOTE:
-The entry "0.0.0.0" don't appear since I don't write the command (after
starting KDE):
"route add -net default gw 149.222.132.1 dev eth0"
-I entred all this values in /etc/route.conf, but Linux don't use the
entry "0.0.0.0"
-You see, that all the NetMask are "255.255.255.255". It is because the
commant route don't accept the real netmask "255.255.192.0" with the
actual IP "149.222.132.1". I don't know why... "route" accept it ONLY
when the IP ended with xxx.xxx.xxx.0. In /etc/route.conf I can write
what I want, Linux don't repair the errors. But when the Netmask is not
"255.255.255.255", I never access the network.
-I can access the local network without writing the extra route command.
A ping with the Gateway or the DNS work in all case. But when DEFAULT
don't appear in the list, I can't access the Internet.
Here is a copy of "/etc/resolv.conf":
#
# /etc/resolv.conf
#
# Automatically generated by SuSEconfig on Fri Jul 2 21:08:35 MEST
1999.
#
# PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE!
#
# Change variables (NAMESERVER + SEARCHLIST) in /etc/rc.config instead.
#
#
search maschinenwesen.fh-kiel.de nsc03.nsc.FH-Kiel.de smtp.FH-Kiel.de
nameserver 149.222.129.201
nameserver 149.222.129.200
NOTE:
-I write this informations under YaST. But I don't know when the "search
list" is the right one. I copy this informations from the output of the
command "route".
-What is "nameserver", is it the DNS? Search list, what does it mean?
> As far as adding custom routes, you can do it via standard to you OS
network
> startup scripts or via adding them to /etc/rc.d/rc.local file.
>
> Good luck!
Thank you.
But I have another question (my last ;-))
Could I install Linux (SuSE ,RedHat or Debian) using a FTP server? How
must I configure the routing?
When the routing is well configured, Yast can reach any FTP server, and
I can update my system via internet (ftp.gwdg.de).
But under the "Installation environment", booting the system with a boot
disk, I can't reach the network. How can I configure the routing
informations under YaST to reach an FTP server
Thanks for your attention... Thanks for all.
Have a lot of FUN.
Romuald.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7m4ukv$ao1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hello world,
> >
> >I have a problem to configure routing informations with SuSE Linux
5.3
> >(kernel 2.0.35). Our network work through a Gateway.
> >
> >The computer run under Windows 95, with network (maintained with
Windows
> >NT4.0). I want to try Linux. (I don't know why... ;) )
> >
> >Under Microsoft Windows 95, I have to configure following
informations:
> >IP 149.222.132.130
> >NetMaplx 255.255.192.0
> >Gateway 149.222.132.1
> >DNS1 149.222.129.200
> >DNS2 149.222.129.201
> >WINS 149.222.129.201 (for Internet access)
> >And this works!!!!
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >But under Linux...
> >
> >YaST maked the installation, and the configuration of my system:
> >
> >- I need a module to work with my network card (3Com 3c509).
> >- I have configured all the stuff
> > Gateway and Netmask is accessible in the same menu of the IP
> >configuration. But the "Name server" is the DNS of Windows, and is
> >reachable from another menu. We cannot configure the WINS under
YaST...
> >And so on, I don't understant all this very painfull configurations
> >- I started my system, it doesn't work...
> >
> >So, I spent a lot of time to read the documentation. I have make (for
> >the second time) the installation. I have edited /etc/rc.config with
> >YaST, and correct the informations...
> >It doesn't work.
> >
> >I have readed, that "route" and "ifconfig" have to maintain the
routing
> >configuration. I have edited /etc/route.conf with the right values,
and
> >ifconfig with the right device... YaST configure a DUMMY device, who
> >take place of my network card: eth0. I removed the use of this device
in
> >/etc/rc.config, with YaST.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >Here is what "route" said:
> >Name IP Gateway Netmask device
> >Gateway 149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth0
> >my_host 149.222.132.130 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 eth0
> >DNS1 149.222.129.200 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 eth0
> >DNS2 149.222.129.201 149.222.132.1 255.255.255.255 eth0
> >default 0.0.0.0 149.222.132.1 0.0.0.0 eth0
> >?????? 149.222.128.0 149.222.132.1 255.255.192.0 eth0
> >
> >It works with this configuration (I have edited the route.conf with
the
> >right values, after testing it with the route command).
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >5 Problems:
> >-----
> >1-
> >When I start my computer, all the addresses are configured. But when
I
> >started XF86 (and KDE), the "default" IP entry is automatically
removed.
> >A ping run with all the addresses of my domain (DNS1, DNS2, Gateway),
> >but I don't have access with Internet anymore.
> >
> >I need to write the command
> >"route add -net default gw 149.222.132.1 dev eth0"
> >after starting KDE
> >
> >Can I write it in the scripts, to run it automatically? ...
> >
> >-----
> >2-
> >The "dummy" address 149.222.128.0 don't exist in my /etc/route.conf.
> >But when I start KDE, it automatically appear. I think that KDE use
this
> >address to reach Internet, instead of the WINS 149.222.129.201.
> >
> >I want to remove it.
> >
> >-----
> >3-
> >I want to update my system to have the new version of route.
> >I want to use an FTP transfer with ftp.gwdg.de.
> >
> >To update my system with SuSE Linux 6.1, I need to install a new
version
> >of YaST. I maked it.
> >
> >To update the base system, I need to run the boot disk. But YaST
can't
> >reach the network alone. It is impossible to write the command
"route"
> >during the installation with a boot disk.
> >
> >I need also a module to drive my card, witch is not included in my
boot
> >disk.
> >
> >I try to run the installation of RedHat with network, it doesn't
work.
> >So, it is not only a problem with YaST.
> >
> >How can I update my base system with an FTP site? (It works for a
normal
> >installation, but not for the base system because I need a boot disk)
> >
> >-----
> >4-
> >I want to access to the Internet with "lynx", because Netscape is too
> >big. I have to modify /etc/rc.config for it, but how? Now, I have no
> >access to the Internet with lynx.
> >
> >-----
> >5-
> >I want to access to the local network, witch contains the data and
the
> >printers.
> >
> >address of the server:
> >\\fs01\...
> >address of the printer (postcript)
> >\\fs01\hp5(stt)
> >
> >There is also some other color printers, and plotters on this net...
> >I have to try it with the mount command, but how?
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >Thank you very much for your help.
> >
> >Have a lot of Fun.
> >
> >Romuald.
> >
> >
> >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> >Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kennedy)
Subject: Re: DSL - cannot ping reliably to home machine
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:23:11 GMT
I have also noticed this. I have a small web site with some pictures
of m kids on it. For around 70% of the day I can not access it
remotely.
Now, I know you are thinking the obvious, ports are blocked. I have
also opened daytime, smtp and a few others. Same thing, I can not
connect to them very realiably.
I check the logs and everything seems fine.
On 12 Jul 1999 05:12:36 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brandon Warren)
wrote:
>
>I have a DSL connection for my Linux box at home.
>Everything works fine when I am sitting in front
>of my home machine. The problem is accessing from
>the outside - sometimes it works, sometimes it does
>not. To test this problem, I set up my home machine
>and my work machine to ping each other every 15 minutes.
>
>The result after 4 hours - pings from home to work
>were reliable, pings from work to home either went through,
>or did not go at all. The failures occured while the pings
>were successful in the other direction, so it's not like
>the DSL connection was down.
>
>Any ideas? Thanks in advance,
>
>Brandon
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward S Meadows)
Crossposted-To: udel.linux
Subject: Telnet/ftp not working after RH 6.0 install
Date: 14 Jul 1999 11:36:43 -0400
I've recently installed RH 6.0 on my home intranet. I'm now
able to ping between my two machines and mount NFS volumes,
but I don't have telnet or ftp service between the two
machines. ftp or telnet attempts hang and eventually time
out.
Running "ps aux" reveals that the expected daemons are
running. I've configured hosts.deny and hosts.allow as I
had them before, without success.
Any tips/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
--Scott
Edward S. Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Chemical Engineering Office: (302) 831-0726
University of Delaware Home/fax: (302) 369-0777
--
Edward S. Meadows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Chemical Engineering Office: (302) 831-0726
University of Delaware Home/fax: (302) 369-0777
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
