Linux-Networking Digest #933, Volume #11 Sun, 18 Jul 99 17:13:43 EDT
Contents:
two problems with netatalk (SuSE 5.3) (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernd_Gr=FCndling?=)
Dead daemons? (R. Christopher Harshman)
getting Email for domain ("Paul Richards")
Re: Linux Internet Email gateway and MS Exchange.... (Bernd Eckenfels)
How to permanent add route command to startup sequence? (John H. Chauvin)
Re: NIC card configuration 3c905B-TX ("Bruce Phillips")
Re: How to connect dumb terminals via Lan and more? (Graham Harris)
Slow transfers out but fast coming in ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diald goes up every 4-5 min? (rbinning)
Re: phoneline/wireless networking drivers (Joseph Wang)
Installing a D-Link DFE-530TX NIC into Redhat6.0 (Stephen)
US Robotics Modem Question (Robert B. Love)
Re: Auto check for email (Scott Marlowe)
Error: Can't get terminal parameters: I/O error (Netjah)
Re: help.. (Scott Marlowe)
Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence? (Scott Marlowe)
linux, PPP, AT&T Worldnet - looks like PPP does not start??? ("Elizabeth Larrey
Konstantinov")
Serial Connection ("Sebastian Speiser")
Re: IP masq amd PPPd diald on demad (Nomad)
Block specific IP with ipchains? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Q: ISDN Gateway with Linux ("choi")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernd_Gr=FCndling?=)
Subject: two problems with netatalk (SuSE 5.3)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:52:51 +0200
Today I finally found some time to install SuSE Linux 5.3 (I know, its
old - my PC is older ;-). I want to install CVS Server that I need to
access from a Macintosh. So I decided to install the predefined "Devel1"
configuration and added only netatalk.
Linux runs, but I have two strange network effects.
a) the two machines do not communicate via TCP/IP. Pinging each other
does not work.
b) netatalk works, but it takes 40 seconds until a volume gets mounted.
Maybe those problems are related, maybe not. Since I am completely new
to any UNIX, I feel somehow lost.
Some infos:
a)
the linux machine is 192.168.6.1, the Mac 192.168.6.2. No connection to
any other network yet. According to the info in SuSE's support database,
the configuration is ok. ifconfig returns very well looking data,
interrupt and IO address are ok. Pinging itself and the loopback device
works.
starting/stopping netatalk does not matter. Enabling/disabling AppleTalk
on the Mac does not help, either.
b)
during the 40 second wait the Mac (G3, German OS 8.6) is frozen. TCP/IP
is always active. When using the chooser to select the linux server, I
get a barber pole dialog called "Verbindungsstatus" (something like
"connection state" in English, I hope). Text inside: "UEberpruefen von:"
("checking:") with no indication what it is going to check, running
forever. If I cancel, I briefly see "reverting to AppleTalk", then I
wait for those 40 seconds. After that, it works.
If I manually add the server's TCP/IP address via the chooser, it gets
shown after "checking" in the dialog mentioned above. Besides that, it
does not make any difference.
The Mac, the cabling and my PC's Ethernet Card are ok: when running NT
4.0 on the PC everthing works fine.
Any ideas?
Bernd.
_______________________________________________________________________
Bernd Gruendling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systemberatung Softwaredesign Telefax: +49 5363 20901
Wendenstrasse 87, Wolfsburg, Germany
------------------------------
From: R. Christopher Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Dead daemons?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:11:12 GMT
I've got a box that I administrate in California (this summer,
I'm in Missouri). It's running kernel 2.2.9 and Slackware 3.5
(heavily modified). I telnet in occasionally (once a day or
so) to make sure everything's more or less kosher, and logfiles
get rotated and emailed to me very night.
A few days ago, the box wasn't responding to telnet or ftp
connections, but ping and apache were still working. I
figured inetd had somehow stopped responding, and remembered
that we had installed 'sshd' after the fact, and that it
was running from /etc/rc.d/rc.local, so I was able to get
in using secure shell. Sure enough, inetd was not listed
among the processes when I did a ps -aux. So, as root,
I fired it back up, and all was well.
Now, yesterday, the messages file that arrived in my inbox
was completely blank (unheard of, even in the summer; there
are always people POP'ing in to check mail, etc), so
I telnetted in to find syslogd not running. No problem,
I su'd to root and fired it back up, and /var/log/messages
is growing accordingly.
But now I'm troubled. What would cause two more or less
reliable pieces of an otherwise rock-solid system (54 days
of uptime since the last time a power outage extended
beyond our UPS capacity) to fail? The rest of the machine
is running normally, and no bizarre error messages have
appeared anywhere (debug, etc).
If anyone has any ideas... Thanks!
- Chris
--
R. Christopher Harshman http://ebhon.jnst.uor.edu/~harshman
Going for a B.S. : "Information Systems and Media Production" (JNST-UOR)
Celeron 300a | i440BX | Mystique 220 + RRStudio | SB Live! | Win98
PIII-450 | i440BX-2 | Fusion AGP 3Dfx Banshee | Yamaha PCI | Linux / NT
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Paul Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: getting Email for domain
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:12:07 GMT
We have got a new domain name and a mail server that collects email for that
domain. The mail server provides us with a single username<domain> that
collects all email for <user>@<domain>.co.uk
I want to set up a linux box that will dial the internet, log on to the
account and collect all email and distribute it to the user on the dial-up
box or send the email to postmaster if the user does not exist.
What are the possible alternatives for setting this up ?
I am trying to use fetchmail, and set up a local email server, but I just
can't seem to get configuration right.
Paul
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Internet Email gateway and MS Exchange....
Date: 18 Jul 1999 17:54:25 GMT
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, the main issue at the moment seems to be that mail in the queue on
> the linux machine dosn't get forwarded to the exchange machine. I thought
> it would just be a case of adding an entry in the hosts file on the linux
> point the email domain to the exchanges IP address (it seems ot wokr this
> way in AIX). Is there something else I need to do?
Depending on your MTA. Because mail is usually routed by DNS lookups. In
smail for example you can add a "force-path" entry to route the mail for the
domain to the exchange server. Anaother option would be to set up your DNS
to point to the exchange (primary) and the linux gateway (secondary) but
this should only be done if the exchange is directly reachable and you want
to receive mail that way.
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John H. Chauvin)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence?
Date: 18 Jul 1999 18:50:18 GMT
I need to add the following command to my startup sequence
so that I can print to my networked HP 4000N printer. My
current procedure is to execute this command as root after
logging in:
route add -host 192.0.0.192 eth0
This command adds the print server to the PC's routing
table. I would prefer not to have to execute this command
everytime I login.
I have tried adding this command via netcfg but with no
success. It is not clear to me why this command is necessary
since other people who I have talked to with a similar setup
do not need to execute this command to access their HP 4000N
printer. Why doesn't Linux (routed) automatically detect the
print server?
I am using Red Hat 6.0.
Thanks,
John Chauvin
--
John H. Chauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netcom - Online Communication Services San Jose, CA
------------------------------
From: "Bruce Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NIC card configuration 3c905B-TX
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:00:48 GMT
Dick Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9nJj3.3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> HELP! I bought a new HP Pavillion system to use as a Linux server. I
also
> bought the 3C905B-TX nic card to handle communications and RedHat 6.0
Boxed
> Software. I have been unable to get the 6.0 release to boot up (it goes
> into an initiallazation loop and goes brain dead before completing daemon
> start-ups) so I went back to a RedHat 5.1 release that I had runn8ing on a
> laptop. The 5.1 release at least boots up sucessfully.
>
> Both systems fail on trying to start the network interface. I need help
to
> tell me how to configure the system. The card works fine under windoze
98,
> but in both Linux systems the boot messages are:
>
> 3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
> The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at 0/80. Updating PCI command
> 0014->0015.
> eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0x1080, 00:50:04:18:12:a5, IRQ 255
> *** Warning: IRQ 255 is unlikely to work! ***
> 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
> MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
> MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
> Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
>
>
> I have tried unsucessfully to modify lilo.conf and conf.modules to no
> avail.. I need help, advice, pointers, or something to point out the way
> for me.
>
> Thanks in advance for help, response to comp.os.linux.networking or
e-mail
> to me will save me monitoring several newsgroups.
>
> Dick Hayes
>
ummm... did you note the part of your error message complaining about irq
255 not being valid ( or very likely). try booting linux without any nic
drivers in the kernel and manually loading the nic driver with an explicitly
declared irq setting.
ie:
/sbin/modprobe 3c509 irq = 10 ( or whatever) ( do this as root)
Bruce Phillips
Electric Rodeo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: {$graham$}@microphoneDOT.prestel.co.uk (Graham Harris)
Subject: Re: How to connect dumb terminals via Lan and more?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 06:18:22 GMT
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:37:39 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Glenn) wrote:
>1. How does one physically connect and then cause a login prompt to be
>generated on a dumb terminal via a Lan connection (Serial to Twisted
>pair on a 10baseT hub)?
You would need a tcp/ip terminal server, a hardware device that would likely
cost more than the linux box and terminal combined.
Or, you could just plug the terminal into a serial port on the linux box...
--
Graham Harris
Equinus- Today's Business & Technology Consultancy for the Travel industry
http://www.equinus.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slow transfers out but fast coming in
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:22:32 GMT
Hi, I'm kind of new to using Linux so bear with me here.
I recently installed RedHat6 on a P75 system. For some reason when I
tried to print the howto's and faq's over the network, my printer
started spitting out blank pages - so use samba to transfer select
files to my windows system for printing. I noticed that it would only
send at about 10Kbytes/s. When I was transferring downloaded files
from my windows system it was going at speeds in excess of
600Kbytes/sec. I have a 3c595 10/100 PCI ethernet card for the
internal network. If you know what to do, please help. Thanx.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: rbinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Diald goes up every 4-5 min?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:20:30 GMT
I have a small home LAN consisting of 1 Linux box (router/print
server/firewall)
1 win95 client, and 1Linux terminal used for web and e-mail access.
Everything works fine except Diald. It is almost to efficient! It seems
that my windows box pings every 4-5 minutes looking for
conformation(whats my name and where is my lunch kit!) I use my ISP DNS
because that is the only way I could get everything to work. According
to "tcpdump" when win95 calls, the router (Linux) directs diald to make
the connection. Information is exchanged and win 95 goes home happy? I
am new to networking so if I over looked the obvious please bear with
me...
I am sure if this diald thing keeps up, my wife will have my backs
packed and set by the door.
Anytime taken to help would be greatly appreciated...
Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Joseph Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: phoneline/wireless networking drivers
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:31:08 GMT
Phoneline ethernet cards which use the AMD PcNet 32 card are supported
by linux as of either 2.2.7 or 2.2.8. These include the Diamond Homefree
Phone line cards, and probably others (look at the big chip in the
middle and see if there is an AMD logo on it).
To activate. Just recompile your kernel with AMD PcNet32 (VLB and PCI)
support, and run.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Installing a D-Link DFE-530TX NIC into Redhat6.0
Date: 18 Jul 1999 19:31:07 GMT
Well here's the problem. When I installed Redhat and tried to autodetect my
NIC it only detected the network interface on the motherboard which I can't
use because this case wouldn't let the panel with an opening for the RJ-45
jack plug into it. So now I'm trying to configure my PCI D-Link card after
Linux has been installed. I feel like such a newbie trying to do this, I've
tried to use linuxconf and netcfg to make this work but to no avail. I'm
going off to school soon and it would be incredibly great if I could access
the school network in Linux rather than being forced to work in..win98. If
someone could please give me some lucid, almost hand-holding instructions
that would be great.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert B. Love )
Subject: US Robotics Modem Question
Date: 18 Jul 1999 18:44:13 GMT
I had a 33KB Supra modem that worked fine for my ppp connection
to my ISP. About the same time I upgraded to RH 6 and a 56K modem
from US Robotics. My ppp performance went to crawl. Once in a
blue moon I'd get decent speeds but for most of the time the
front panel lights show no activity for 10s of seconds instead of
constant blinking like on the slower Supra.
Changing back to the Supra modem shows the same performance I
had previously. Good but not great. But this leave me to believe
that my problems are with the USR 56K modem, not the ppp setup
or the new RH 6 software.
What modem init string should I be using for the 56K modem and are
there any other operating or configuration tips that will help me
get the full use of this modem.
Thanx in advance for all suggestions.
--
================================================================
Bob Love
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
================================================================
------------------------------
From: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Auto check for email
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 13:30:39 -0600
Michael wrote:
> Is it possible to get Linux to check for emails automatically, I mean is
> there a programe there can call up the net, check for emails and then
> shutdown again, for instance every 10. minutes?
>
Yes, the program is called fetchmail and should be installed by default,
but it's easy to find. It is installed by default on RH5.x and 6.x for
sure.
------------------------------
From: Netjah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Error: Can't get terminal parameters: I/O error
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:06:36 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone tell me why this happens when I try to open a ppp connection:
Can't get terminal parameters: I/O error
This message is from the log files.
Thank you.
------------------------------
From: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help..
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 13:40:03 -0600
Vigre Elf wrote:
> i have 3 questions..
> 1. Is there any util that searches for files....i mean goes
> through everything to find it unlike find or whereis...?
locate is a command that runs offa database on RH installs and is very fast a
thorough.
cd /
ls -lR |grep <filename>
works well, but takes a really long time...
> 2. Is there any program that lets you access a console thats running on another
> computer...lets say im running an FTP client on me server downstairs...and
> upstairs i want to modify what its doing...id like it if i could control the
> screen for a while....
VNC works kinda like that. Do a search on google for VNC and hit I'm feeling
lucky.
> 3. is there anyway i can find how much room a directory is taking up?
> .jorge - sorry bout all the questions
du is the command, and du -s is the summary.
Welcome to Unix (oh, sorry, Linux.)
------------------------------
From: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 13:40:52 -0600
"John H. Chauvin" wrote:
> I need to add the following command to my startup sequence
> so that I can print to my networked HP 4000N printer. My
> current procedure is to execute this command as root after
> logging in:
>
> route add -host 192.0.0.192 eth0
>
> This command adds the print server to the PC's routing
> table. I would prefer not to have to execute this command
> everytime I login.
>
> I have tried adding this command via netcfg but with no
> success. It is not clear to me why this command is necessary
> since other people who I have talked to with a similar setup
> do not need to execute this command to access their HP 4000N
> printer. Why doesn't Linux (routed) automatically detect the
> print server?
>
> I am using Red Hat 6.0.
Try adding it to /etc/rc.d/rc.local
------------------------------
From: "Elizabeth Larrey Konstantinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: linux, PPP, AT&T Worldnet - looks like PPP does not start???
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:25:29 -0500
I am using PPP 2.3.8, kernel 2.2.10 with AT&T WorldNet. Linux installation
is SlackWare 3.1
I have a /etc/chap-secrets file set up exactly as the Wurd page for
WorldNet/Linux instructs.
here is my script:
/usr/sbin/pppd noauth name "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" \
user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -d \
connect '/usr/sbin/chat -t 45 -v ABORT BUSY "" \
ATDT9700304 CONNECT ""' \
/dev/ttyS2 38400 debug noipdefault modem \
defaultroute kdebug 25
resorv.conf is set up as wurd instructs also. It looks like I never get to
authenticate myself and ppp on the isp side never starts.
It looks like I keep sending LCP ConfReq's -- does that mean that my PPP is
asking the ISP to authenticate itself? I did specify the 'noauth' option
(see the script).
Can the linux installation (libraries, etc...) be too old??
The modem works (I tried dialing in minicom). PLEASE HELP!
Thanks
Andre
l 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 30 31 65 76 0D 0D 0A 0D 01ev....
Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 0D 0A 57 65 6C 63 6F 6D ..Welcom
Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 65 20 0D 0D 0A 50 6C 65 e ...Ple
Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 61 73 65 20 53 69 67 6E ase Sign
Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 2D 6F 6E 3A 20 -on:
Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: 7E 7D C0 7D 7D 21 20 34 ~}.}}! 4
Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: 7D 7D 7C }}|
Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: ppp: tossing frame (e0)
Jul 18 12:08:38 physics pppd[973]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xdadf7cbe> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 7E FF C0 7D 7D 21 20 7D ~..}}! }
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 7D 7D 7C }}|
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, length = 14
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 14
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: FF C0 00 21 21 21 5D 5D ...!!!]]
Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 5D 00 20 25 FA 7C ]. %.|
Jul 18 12:08:41 physics pppd[973]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xdadf7cbe> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 9
Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: 7E FF C0 21 21 21 20 7D ~..!!! }
Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: 7D }
Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, length = 8
Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 8
Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 9
Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: FF 03 E0 5D 21 20 34 22 ...]! 4"
Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: 5C \
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 0D 0A 4E 61 6D 65 2C 20 ..Name,
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 70 61 73 pas
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 38
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 73 77 6F 72 64 20 70 61 sword pa
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 69 72 20 69 6E 63 6F 72 ir incor
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 72 65 63 74 0D 0A 50 6C rect..Pl
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 65 61 73 65 20 53 69 67 ease Sig
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 6E 2D 6F 6E 3A 20 n-on:
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp0 released
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp0: ccp closed
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics pppd[973]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jul 18 12:08:59 physics pppd[973]: Connection terminated.
Jul 18 12:09:00 physics pppd[973]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jul 18 12:09:00 physics pppd[973]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: "Sebastian Speiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Serial Connection
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:28:06 +0200
How can I make a connection between two PC's with a serial cable. I read
some HOWTO's and I recognized that I'm a Newbie. My one PC:
- 486 25 Mhz without FPU
- 4 MB RAM
- 14 MB SWAP
- 76 MB Root
- serial port /dev/ttyS0
The other:
- P II 233 MHz
- 128 MB Ram
- 80 MB Swap
- 4 GB Root
- serial port /dev/ttyS1
I have a cable and don't know what I can do now. Please answer in easy
English ;-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nomad)
Subject: Re: IP masq amd PPPd diald on demad
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:15:46 GMT
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:31:04 GMT, Anders Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I have a strange problem
>
>I have 2 Mac, the server running linux 2.2.x and the other Mac OS 8.6
>
>I have PPPd diald on demand working just fine, and i'm now trying to set up
>IP-masq, to allow internet acces from MacOS.
>
>Initialy it works fine (that is after setting masq up). But once my modem
>disconnects, i'm unable to use the internet on the computer running MacOS.
>pppd (linux) detects a requst from macOS and dialds, but somehow ip-masq
>won't allow acces to the internet.
>
>I'm not sure wether pppd is the problem or ip-masq, as it works fine the
>first time.
>
>My ip-address is dynamicly allocated from my ISP
>Does anyone have the samme problem - and a solution????
>
>Anders
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
I have the same problem. I found out that diald and ipmasq are not
working together. When diald connects or disconnects it changes the
routing and a new ipmasq (rule change) must be run to enable ip
masquerating again.
I am trying to edit the diald connect and disconnect scripts so the
rules change when (dis)connected or a route is changed.
The ppp option of ipmasq doesn't work with me.
Jeroen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Block specific IP with ipchains?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:49:27 GMT
I am on a corporate network with 5 of my buddies
running redhat 6.0. At times someone will
occasionally export DISPLAY=<my IP> and launch
xsnow or xmelt or something. I want to be able to
block all traffic from their IP addressess while
allowing me to contact them if necessary. I have
installed ipchains and used the following command
ipchains -A input -s 90.14.153.5 -d 90.14.152.92
-j DENY
This will not allow connections from 90.14.153.5
but it also prevents me from contacting that IP
from my box. I think because I am using one nic
card instead of the traditional two cards and a
dedicated firewall server it won't allow traffic
like I want it to. Is there a way to block
connections from a specific IP while allowing
connections to that IP with only one nic card?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "choi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Q: ISDN Gateway with Linux
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:10:16 +0200
Hello everyone,
i have one question.
I have installed one linux proxy server with masquerading. And now i want
use that server as call-in server for the other office, a gateway server.
Only this server have linux and the others have all microsoft 9x.
I don't know exactly, is it possible to see microsoft resourcen through
linux?
Sorry so bad english, but i need some help and write it here.
Thanks alot.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
