Linux-Networking Digest #934, Volume #11 Sun, 18 Jul 99 21:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: Dead daemons? (Erik de Castro Lopo)
Re: cable modem and network hub.. (Wayne Throop)
IPIP tunneling ("Philippe Beaudoin")
Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence? (Rudolf Potucek)
Re: Block specific IP with ipchains? ("Steve Cowles")
Networking.... ("DeMoN")
DUMB TERMINALS (dkwok)
TCP Error: No Route to Host (Joe Haberthier)
Re: Connect to ISP when phone rings: is this possible? (Jim Richardson)
Help: modem not recognized - cannot dial ISP ("Jim Champion")
Re: Help: modem not recognized - cannot dial ISP (Robert Lynch)
Re: My Dissapointment to find Linux not a viable solution (root)
Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence? (John H. Chauvin)
Re: linux, PPP, AT&T Worldnet - looks like PPP does not start??? (Tom Loria)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Dead daemons?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 07:20:23 +1000
R. Christopher Harshman wrote:
>
> I've got a box that I administrate in California (this summer,
> I'm in Missouri). It's running kernel 2.2.9 and Slackware 3.5
> (heavily modified). I telnet in occasionally (once a day or
> so) to make sure everything's more or less kosher, and logfiles
> get rotated and emailed to me very night.
Telent in? So you user id and paddword can be sniffed by anyone?
Really, you shouldn't. You have SSH installed; use it.
> A few days ago, the box wasn't responding to telnet or ftp
> connections, but ping and apache were still working. I
> figured inetd had somehow stopped responding, and remembered
> that we had installed 'sshd' after the fact, and that it
> was running from /etc/rc.d/rc.local, so I was able to get
> in using secure shell. Sure enough, inetd was not listed
> among the processes when I did a ps -aux. So, as root,
> I fired it back up, and all was well.
>
> Now, yesterday, the messages file that arrived in my inbox
> was completely blank (unheard of, even in the summer; there
> are always people POP'ing in to check mail, etc), so
> I telnetted in to find syslogd not running. No problem,
> I su'd to root and fired it back up, and /var/log/messages
> is growing accordingly.
>
> But now I'm troubled. What would cause two more or less
> reliable pieces of an otherwise rock-solid system (54 days
> of uptime since the last time a power outage extended
> beyond our UPS capacity) to fail? The rest of the machine
> is running normally, and no bizarre error messages have
> appeared anywhere (debug, etc).
My guess is that someone sniffed your telnet password and
logged in. They shut down telnet to stop you getting back in
and shutdown syslogd to cover their tracks.
What you need to do from here, is get all the important data
off the machine and do a complete reinstall.
Erik
--
+-------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-------------------------------------------------+
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible
gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." -- Stephen Roberts
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wayne Throop)
Subject: Re: cable modem and network hub..
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:03:25 GMT
:: And indeed it has proven true: if I change the NIC by which I access
:: the net, I must reset my modem.
: Jeremy S Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Well I've got static address from @Home and have switched many
: different network cards around with no problem. I've also plugged the
: cable modem directly into my hub (via crossover). When the interface
: that the modem plugs into changes, it usually goes offline shortly
: (less than 30 secs) for a network configuration, then works fine.
: (I've got a Com21 2000 cable modem.)
Cool! Looks like the code in that modem is significantly smarter
than that in the antique I'm renting from @home. So the lesson is,
it might work or it might require the modem to be manually reset.
I haven't heard of a case where you need to petition @home to
change it for you, for what that's worth.
Wayne Throop [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sheol.org/throopw
------------------------------
From: "Philippe Beaudoin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPIP tunneling
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:27:40 GMT
I tried unsuccessfully to setup IP/IP on my linux box.
Here are my settings:
LAN 1:
Network: 192.168.1.0
Eth0: 192.168.1.1
Eth1: a.b.c.d
LAN 2:
Network: 192.168.2.0
Eth0: 192.168.2.1
Eth1: e.f.g.h
Both LANs are connected to the Internet using modemcables. Both are doing
masquerading for their networks.
As an example, I tried to do the following:
[root@machine2 /root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.2.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
e.f.g.h * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
e.f.g.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default e.f.g.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
(NOTE: These are the routes before I try to install the tunnel.)
[root@machine2 /root]# ifconfig tunl0 up 192.168.2.100
[root@machine2 /root]# route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw
a.b.c.d tunl0
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
[root@machine2 /root]#
I know I should be able to reach the gateway (a.b.c.d) in one hop, which is
definitly not the case here... I'm sure there's something I'm not doing
correctly. Can somebody point it out?
Philippe Beaudoin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rudolf Potucek)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence?
Date: 18 Jul 1999 21:11:55 GMT
I am slightly confused ... Are you using eth0 for internal and external
addresses alike? I'd call thet a no-no if I were you ISP but then I
agree, use
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
But if you are actually using one NIC (eth0) for an internal or
selfsufficient network, then the way would be to edit
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
to contain
DEVICE=eth0
IPADDR=192.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.0.0.0
BROADCAST=192.0.0.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
which would automatically set up the interface and a default route to all
devices in the 192.0.0.x network, including that printer ...
Rudolf
John H. Chauvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I need to add the following command to my startup sequence
: so that I can print to my networked HP 4000N printer. My
: current procedure is to execute this command as root after
: logging in:
: route add -host 192.0.0.192 eth0
: This command adds the print server to the PC's routing
: table. I would prefer not to have to execute this command
: everytime I login.
: I have tried adding this command via netcfg but with no
: success. It is not clear to me why this command is necessary
: since other people who I have talked to with a similar setup
: do not need to execute this command to access their HP 4000N
: printer. Why doesn't Linux (routed) automatically detect the
: print server?
: I am using Red Hat 6.0.
: Thanks,
: John Chauvin
: --
: John H. Chauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Netcom - Online Communication Services San Jose, CA
--
------------------------------
From: "Steve Cowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Block specific IP with ipchains?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:09:02 GMT
Instead of using ipchains, try the "xhost -x.x.x.x" command. This might
accomplish what you are trying to do with ipchains. Also take a look a
Xsecurity, man Xsecurity.
Steve Cowles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7mtekk$a2c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am on a corporate network with 5 of my buddies
> running redhat 6.0. At times someone will
> occasionally export DISPLAY=<my IP> and launch
> xsnow or xmelt or something. I want to be able to
> block all traffic from their IP addressess while
> allowing me to contact them if necessary. I have
> installed ipchains and used the following command
>
> ipchains -A input -s 90.14.153.5 -d 90.14.152.92
> -j DENY
>
> This will not allow connections from 90.14.153.5
> but it also prevents me from contacting that IP
> from my box. I think because I am using one nic
> card instead of the traditional two cards and a
> dedicated firewall server it won't allow traffic
> like I want it to. Is there a way to block
> connections from a specific IP while allowing
> connections to that IP with only one nic card?
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "DeMoN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Networking....
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 14:56:33 -0700
OK, I got a /28 subnet and all is working fine except on linux.
Linux Redhat v6.0 <fresh out of the box> is currently dual booting with
Win98.
Win98 is working fine. Network works fine. <ping/tracert's just fine>
Ethernet Card: Unknown Brand.
-Win98 sees it as: 32-bit PCI Ethernet Adapter 10/100 NDIS3
-Linux upon installation sees: Digital 21040 Tulip Card
-Linux after installing in 'dmesg' it sees: eth0: Macronix 98715 PMAC
at 0x6800, 00 00 e8 59 9c c9, IRQ 11
The above eth0 resources are the same as Win98 sees them as.
I ran diag on my card. All is well and fine with the hardware.
I am positive I have setup the network in Linux properly.
There are no hardware conflicts.
Installed Hardware: Sound Blaster16, Creative RIVA TNT, Unknown Ethernet
Adapter
Problems: Wont network, wont toss packets and there are times the link
lights dont light.
Any advise? I scoured support.redhat.com to no avail. I am a newbie at
Linux/Unix in general.
Please speak as though I am a 4 year old child if your going to talk 'linux
speak' to me.
I would appreciate any/all help in this matter as I am stumped. Only thing I
can
think of is Linux just dont like this ethernet card...
--
--
DeMoN "The Evil Empire"
-Home http://www.demonshouse.net
-ISDN hosted by Pacifier, Inc. http://www.pacifier.com
-Need security? http://www.openbsd.org
Washington State Resident - Spam Laws are enforced
------------------------------
From: dkwok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DUMB TERMINALS
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:10:31 +1000
I want to setup some dumb terminals at home so that more people can
access the net.
Any material I can use to do this?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Haberthier)
Subject: TCP Error: No Route to Host
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:59:07 GMT
I tried to set up a PPP conection with KPP and it connects with my
ISP, however its compalining about " NO ROUTE TO HOST". Below
is what I get when I type in "ROUTE"
DESTINATION GATEWAY GENMASK FLAG IFACE
192.168.1.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH
eth0
166.102.100.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH
ppp0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U
lo
default 166.102.100.1 0.0.0.0 UG
ppp0
default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG
eth0
I think its a routing problem, what sould I put in for the route?
Route add ? Originally I thought it was a DNS problem
What could be causing this?
Thanks in advance,
Joe
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Richardson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Connect to ISP when phone rings: is this possible?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 02:03:45 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18 Jul 1999 02:57:47 GMT,
TAT, in the persona of <TAT>,
brought forth the following words...:
>Hi all
>
>Is it possible to have my modem detect an incoming call, hang up
>on that call and immediately run pppon? I'd like to connect to my
>home machine from office, and I don't have a modem at office.
>
>TIA
Yes it's possible, what's more, if you have caller id (and your modem at home
supports it.) you could have it do this only when a given number (your work
number for eg) is the one calling.
check the man and info pages for mgetty.
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
WWW.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
------------------------------
From: "Jim Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help: modem not recognized - cannot dial ISP
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:42:23 -0000
I just installed RH6.0 and have been attempting to setup networking so I can
dial in to my ISP (prodigy). My modem is a Rockwell HCF 56K Data Fax PCI
modem. It is setup for COM3 IRQ 10 by default in HW. I have tried using
setserial (setserial -b /dev/ttyS2) but when I do setserial -a /dev/ttyS2
afterwards it shows unknown UART which I understand not to be good. If I
look in /var/log/messages after trying to connect with minicom or other
program I basically see an error message saying 'cant get terminal
parameters.....Input output error'. I think this is because my modem isn't
recognized. If you can help I'd really appreciate it. I've been struggling
with this for a while now.
Regards,
Jim C.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:23:22 -0700
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: modem not recognized - cannot dial ISP
Jim Champion wrote:
>
> I just installed RH6.0 and have been attempting to setup networking so I can
> dial in to my ISP (prodigy). My modem is a Rockwell HCF 56K Data Fax PCI
> modem. It is setup for COM3 IRQ 10 by default in HW. I have tried using
> setserial (setserial -b /dev/ttyS2) but when I do setserial -a /dev/ttyS2
> afterwards it shows unknown UART which I understand not to be good. If I
> look in /var/log/messages after trying to connect with minicom or other
> program I basically see an error message saying 'cant get terminal
> parameters.....Input output error'. I think this is because my modem isn't
> recognized. If you can help I'd really appreciate it. I've been struggling
> with this for a while now.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim C.
This is probably a winmodem. See:
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/19990717a.html
Time for a new modem.
Bob L.
--
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Re: My Dissapointment to find Linux not a viable solution
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:30:42 -0400
Tam McLaughlin wrote:
> mlw wrote:
>
> >
> > > So, I have been informed that the linux server is not secure and we need a
> > > proper
> > > firewall.
> >
> > What is a "proper" fire wall, and how is it different from the
> > filewalling software that comes with most distributions? If you want
> > real security use the Linux proxy server or even IP Masquerading.
> >
>
> I am not sure anymore what a proper firewall is. I understood firewall to mean
> that we
> have some type of protection between our LAN and the rest of the word that makes
> our
> LAN invisible to the outside world while the the line is up. I believed that the
> delegate proxy
> server would do this since data has to pass between the proxy server and our
> network/internet.
> Also it is a sinle modem dialling up to our ISP and we are allocated a dynamic IP
> address.
> I do not think we require IP masquerading since this would mean we need to buy
> some legal
> IP addresses from our ISP ?
>
> >
> > > We also need a better method of virus scanning rather than
> > > updating
> > > each PC each month. I believe we could use samba for this with some type of
> > > network AV software.
> >
> > Anti-virus software has to execute on a PC. If you need to have company
> > wide virus scanning, put MacAffee on a network drive. In the startup
> > script for your NOS have the client copy it locally.
> >
> > Every couple months, when MacAffee has an update, simply copy the files
> > to the network directory. Windows machines reboot at least every week,
> > so no problem.
> >
> > >
>
> This sounds like what I want to do and would like to try this with samba
>
> >
> > > I know hat I could go out and buy an NT server with MSProxy or whatever and
> > > some
> > > email package, firewall-1 and mime-sweeper. But this would cost a hell of a
> > > lot
> > > or money which I dont know our company would be willing to pay for (ok, i
> > > know all
> > > about the importance how much is our data worth etc etc...).
> >
> > The e-mail virus scanner is the only thing that Linux does not have,
> > simply because it does not need it. However, you could easily setup an
> > e-mail scanner that looks for attachments that end in ".doc" ".com" and
> > ".exe."
> >
>
> There have been many opinions on whethere mail should be scanned for viruses
> on a linux (or any server). Whether there are any viruses for Linux or not is the
> point
> not that Linux is acting as a mail server therefore there should be some program
> that
> scans all incomming mail to check for viruses and either discard or notify or
> whatever
> before the mail gets to the desktop? To purely rely on users to scan for viruses
> is is not
> good enough (in my experience anyway).
>
> >
> > >
> > > So, why is there Linux based solution. Why is there no AV scanning software
> > > that can
> > > run on Linux? If there is , does anyone know of a local company that can
> > > help us?
> >
Hi, I hope I'm not confounding things by jumping into this mid-thread, but didn't
Mcafee port a client of their NetShield product to Linux, SCO, AIX, and others back
in March?
Hope this helps.....
Shawn
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John H. Chauvin)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to permanent add route command to startup sequence?
Date: 19 Jul 1999 00:22:06 GMT
>I am slightly confused ... Are you using eth0 for internal and external
>addresses alike? I'd call thet a no-no if I were you ISP but then I
>agree, use
>
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>
>But if you are actually using one NIC (eth0) for an internal or
>selfsufficient network, then the way would be to edit
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>
>to contain
>
> DEVICE=eth0
> IPADDR=192.0.0.1
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> NETWORK=192.0.0.0
> BROADCAST=192.0.0.255
> ONBOOT=yes
> BOOTPROTO=none
>
>which would automatically set up the interface and a default route to all
>devices in the 192.0.0.x network, including that printer ...
>
>Rudolf
I am not sure what I am doing. My current "network" contains
just my PC and the HP 4000N connected via ethernet using a
Asante Hub. I have configured PPP to connect to my ISP so
that I can access the web and telnet out but have no plans
to provide incoming access for any service. I am not even
sure I need an IP address for my PC.
I have been struggling to determine the correct way to configure
my ethernet. Do I use the IP address of my PC or printer?
Which methods do you think best fits my situation?
Thanks for the help.
John Chauvin
--
John H. Chauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netcom - Online Communication Services San Jose, CA
------------------------------
From: Tom Loria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: linux, PPP, AT&T Worldnet - looks like PPP does not start???
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 20:54:10 -0400
I see in the message below at 12:08:59 ("Name and password pair incorrect..
Please sign-on:")
In the Worldnet dialer unix variant newsgroup, someone mentioned that you have
to configure chat to
look for (on:) from the sign-on: instead of the default (in:). I added on:
".$NAME." to the chat part of the script. which
was on the AT&T WURD site.
$command="/usr/sbin/pppd name \"".$NAME."\"".
" -d connect \'/usr/sbin/chat -t 45 -v ABORT BUSY
\"\" ATDT".$PHONE." CONNECT \"\" on: ".$NAME."\' ".$MODEM.
^ ^
" 57600 noipdefault modem defaultroute crtscts";
I hope this helps.
Betty
Elizabeth Larrey Konstantinov wrote:
> I am using PPP 2.3.8, kernel 2.2.10 with AT&T WorldNet. Linux installation
> is SlackWare 3.1
> I have a /etc/chap-secrets file set up exactly as the Wurd page for
> WorldNet/Linux instructs.
>
> here is my script:
>
> /usr/sbin/pppd noauth name "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" \
> user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -d \
> connect '/usr/sbin/chat -t 45 -v ABORT BUSY "" \
> ATDT9700304 CONNECT ""' \
> /dev/ttyS2 38400 debug noipdefault modem \
> defaultroute kdebug 25
>
> resorv.conf is set up as wurd instructs also. It looks like I never get to
> authenticate myself and ppp on the isp side never starts.
> It looks like I keep sending LCP ConfReq's -- does that mean that my PPP is
> asking the ISP to authenticate itself? I did specify the 'noauth' option
> (see the script).
> Can the linux installation (libraries, etc...) be too old??
> The modem works (I tried dialing in minicom). PLEASE HELP!
>
> Thanks
> Andre
>
> l 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 30 31 65 76 0D 0D 0A 0D 01ev....
> Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 0D 0A 57 65 6C 63 6F 6D ..Welcom
> Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 65 20 0D 0D 0A 50 6C 65 e ...Ple
> Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 61 73 65 20 53 69 67 6E ase Sign
> Jul 18 12:08:29 physics kernel: 2D 6F 6E 3A 20 -on:
> Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
> Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: 7E 7D C0 7D 7D 21 20 34 ~}.}}! 4
> Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: 7D 7D 7C }}|
> Jul 18 12:08:30 physics kernel: ppp: tossing frame (e0)
> Jul 18 12:08:38 physics pppd[973]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> <magic 0xdadf7cbe> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 7E FF C0 7D 7D 21 20 7D ~..}}! }
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 7D 7D 7C }}|
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, length = 14
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 14
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: FF C0 00 21 21 21 5D 5D ...!!!]]
> Jul 18 12:08:39 physics kernel: 5D 00 20 25 FA 7C ]. %.|
> Jul 18 12:08:41 physics pppd[973]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> <magic 0xdadf7cbe> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 9
> Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: 7E FF C0 21 21 21 20 7D ~..!!! }
> Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: 7D }
> Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: frame with bad fcs, length = 8
> Jul 18 12:08:42 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 8
> Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: ppp: bad frame, count = 9
> Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: FF 03 E0 5D 21 20 34 22 ...]! 4"
> Jul 18 12:08:57 physics kernel: 5C \
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 11
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 0D 0A 4E 61 6D 65 2C 20 ..Name,
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 70 61 73 pas
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: receive buffer, count = 38
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 73 77 6F 72 64 20 70 61 sword pa
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 69 72 20 69 6E 63 6F 72 ir incor
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 72 65 63 74 0D 0A 50 6C rect..Pl
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 65 61 73 65 20 53 69 67 ease Sig
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: 6E 2D 6F 6E 3A 20 n-on:
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp0 released
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics kernel: ppp0: ccp closed
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics pppd[973]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
> Jul 18 12:08:59 physics pppd[973]: Connection terminated.
> Jul 18 12:09:00 physics pppd[973]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> Jul 18 12:09:00 physics pppd[973]: Exit.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
