Linux-Networking Digest #935, Volume #11         Sun, 18 Jul 99 23:13:31 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Are NetGear cards supported under Linux? (Scott Prive)
  Re: Dead daemons? (Frank v Waveren)
  Ethernet card support for Compaq NetFlex-2 Enet/TR?? (ncannon)
  Re: Squid + Junkbuster??? HELP!!! (Adrian Hands)
  Re: Telnet problem (John Thompson)
  SN-3200CT + linux = ?? ("Chad")
  pppd message: Recieve serial link not clean ("Mark Bennett")
  Re: kppp setup solution! (Christopher Chan)
  Sendmail initialization is slow ("David A. Ferguson")
  Re: PING in NT DOMAIN and LINUX ("Bwilkinson1")
  Building a Digital modem box with Linux ? (David Nillesen)
  1 way connection (Michael Adam Schulman)
  TCP Error: No Route to Host (Kari Suomela)
  can't get terminal parameters - not a typewriter ("Andre Konstantinov")
  chat script problems ("Dean")
  Re: ???:Odd Masqu "Problem"??? - Solved! (Douglas E. Mitton)
  Re: Newbie Q: Getting message 'RPC program not registered ' when trying  
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Apache :- CacheNegotiatedDocs (Ng Kiok Teck)
  Re: Machine disappears till ping? (John Coppens)
  Re: Auto check for email (Monte Milanuk)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Scott Prive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Are NetGear cards supported under Linux?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:33:27 -0400

I'd just like to add I got one of the NetGear PCI 10/100T cards for $29 at
CompUSA... a DEAL! I've dealt with their tech support and they are competent
as well (in my experience). Because it's MUCH cheaper than 3com or Intel and
has been reliable I've been recommending this card left and right.

The installation papers only mention "other OS's see text files on floppy",
and I overlooked this the first time. They include instructions as a
readme.txt, and even include their own tulip.c file for the kernel... but
you DON'T need this and it could be older than what's in the latest kernel.

The card works great under Linux (sorry I forget the model# of my card), but
if you dual-boot... under Windows 98 you MAY need to set the card to run
with the 16-bit driver. I was a little disappointed about that, especially
since the 32-bit Windows driver worked fine before I rebuilt the system (and
it was Linux/Win95). Oh well, card still works...

Scott

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Yes NetGear cards are supported.  When you compile a kernel just choose
> the Dec Tulip 21140.  I have one in my Debian 2.1 system right now.
>
> Dustin
>
> John Hardin wrote:
>
> > Stephan wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >    I have Debian 2.1 on which I'm going to be installing the 2.2.x
> > >kernel.  I just got a NetGear EA201C 10BT ISA Ethernet card.  I just
> > >checked the Ethernet howto, and I didn't see this manufacturer
> > listed.  Is
> > >it supported or should I return it? (On the box it says it can be
> > used on
> > >SCO UNIX)  If it is supported, what driver do I need and where do I
> > get it?
> >
> > If you've opened the box, take a look at the numbers on the biggest
> > chip. They may appear in the Ethernet HOWTO or the Redhat Hardware
> > Compatibility List.
> >
> > --
> >  John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
> >  PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> >   In the Lion
> >   the Mighty Lion
> >   the Zebra sleeps tonight...
> >   Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank v Waveren)
Subject: Re: Dead daemons?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 01:22:23 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> R. Christopher Harshman wrote:
>> 
>> I've got a box that I administrate in California (this summer,
>> I'm in Missouri).  It's running kernel 2.2.9 and Slackware 3.5
>> (heavily modified).  I telnet in occasionally (once a day or
>> so) to make sure everything's more or less kosher, and logfiles
>> get rotated and emailed to me very night.
> 
> Telent in? So you user id and paddword can be sniffed by anyone?
> Really, you shouldn't. You have SSH installed; use it.
> 
>> A few days ago, the box wasn't responding to telnet or ftp
>> connections, but ping and apache were still working.  I
>> figured inetd had somehow stopped responding, and remembered
>> that we had installed 'sshd' after the fact, and that it
>> was running from /etc/rc.d/rc.local, so I was able to get
>> in using secure shell.  Sure enough, inetd was not listed
>> among the processes when I did a ps -aux.  So, as root,
>> I fired it back up, and all was well.
>> 
>> Now, yesterday, the messages file that arrived in my inbox
>> was completely blank (unheard of, even in the summer; there
>> are always people POP'ing in to check mail, etc), so
>> I telnetted in to find syslogd not running.  No problem,
>> I su'd to root and fired it back up, and /var/log/messages
>> is growing accordingly.
>> 
>> But now I'm troubled.  What would cause two more or less
>> reliable pieces of an otherwise rock-solid system (54 days
>> of uptime since the last time a power outage extended
>> beyond our UPS capacity) to fail?  The rest of the machine
>> is running normally, and no bizarre error messages have
>> appeared anywhere (debug, etc).
> 
> My guess is that someone sniffed your telnet password and
> logged in. They shut down telnet to stop you getting back in
> and shutdown syslogd to cover their tracks.
> 
> What you need to do from here, is get all the important data
> off the machine and do a complete reinstall.

Or, if you haven't got a t3 handy, and don't want to go up there and back
it all up: shut down all daemons you don't absolutely need, erase and
recompile all the others. Replace all suid executables... Possibly replace the
kernel. That should get you at least reasonably safe...

(Oh yes, one more thing: Change the passwords :-) )
-- 

                        Frank v Waveren
                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        ICQ# 10074100

------------------------------

From: ncannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Ethernet card support for Compaq NetFlex-2 Enet/TR??
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:40:07 -0500

Hello does anybody know if there is a driver for the following ethernet
card?  Compaq NetFlex-2 Enet/TR?  I've never seen it listed as
unsupported.  I do see NetFlex-3/P listed.  Does anybody have any
informatoin about this card and any support in Linux?

Thanks


------------------------------

From: Adrian Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Squid + Junkbuster??? HELP!!!
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:19:25 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RaZoR wrote:
> 
> Hey guys :-)
> 
> I have RH 6 installed on my P2 266 64 RAM.
> I've been using Junkbuster for a while and it works great, but now i've
> decided to set up Squid too and enable them both, so they can work
> together.
> On the Junkbuster's page they tell you how to enable squid and
> junkbuster to work this way:
> Browser ---> Junkbuster ----> Squid ------> WWW
> But this way squid  caches all ads anyway, and i lose bandwidth (the

will it ?  I don't think so.
Here's how it works:
(1) Browser requests a page through Junkbuster proxy,
(2) Junkbuster passes request to server through squid,
(3) Resulting HTML is passed back to browser,
(4) Browser parses HTML, sees inline <IMG>s and requests them through
junkbuster proxy
(5) Junkbuster recognizes them as ADs and does NOT pass them to squid,
passes "not found" or dummy content back to the browser instead

Voila, no ads coming down the pipe !

No ?

-Adrian
Raleigh, NC

------------------------------

From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet problem
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:04:41 -0600

Juan Jos� Ruiz P�rez wrote:

> I manage a small LAN based on Linux (R.H. 6.0) and some Win9x.
> The problem I have is that many users use telnet  to connect to the
> linux box and sometimes don't close their sessions :-(.
> Does anyone know a package (rpm) or just a small script to be run by
> cron that kills :-) those opened sessions after an iddle time?
> (perhaps using the output of w, finger etc.)

Have you tried the "idled" package:

        Idled is a "demon" that runs on a machine to keep 
        an eye on current users.  If users have been idle 
        for too long, or have been logged on for too long, 
        it will warn them and log them out appropriately. 

Sounds like what you're looking for...

-- 

-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

From: "Chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SN-3200CT + linux = ??
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 20:05:36 -0500

hi
im new at this linux stuff.
but here is my problem
i got a SN3200CT network card (some web sites say its a D Link but who
knows). i got linux slackware 4.0. and i got drivers for this network card
for LINUX 1.2.13 or whatever. now i follow the directions to tar it and do a
makeconfig and say (Y)es for network settings  blah blah blah . but my card
does not come up.  could this be because i have a new kernel.

here is the full directions i have tell me what to do please

INSTALL
   -------

   1. Login as root user. Using the cp command to copy the "lin8029.tar"
      files from the drivers' diskette into the Linux directory.
      # mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt
      # cp /mnt/linux/lin8029.tar /

   2. Extract drivers from the "lin8029.tar" file.
      # cd /
      # tar -xvf lin8029.tar

   3. To include networking and SN-3200 support in your kernel:
      # cd /usr/src/linux
      # make config (answer yes on CONFIG_NET and CONFIG_INET and Realtek)
         a. "Network device support?"  ------> y
         b. When system prompts "Realtek cards?", answer 'y'.
         c. Then answer 'y' to the "RTL8029 support" item.
      # make clean
      # make depend
      # make zlilo (or whatever magic you usually do)

   4. Do "sync" and reboot the new kernel with a SN-3200 adapter
      connected.




------------------------------

From: "Mark Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd message: Recieve serial link not clean
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 21:28:56 -0400

I am trying to connect to local ISP and have used every dial I can find as
well as pppd connect combination (details below).  I get connected, and all
is OK up till (in /var/log/messages)
#pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
#Using inerface ppp0
#Connect:ppp0 <--> /dev/tty1
#LCP:timeout sending Config-Requests
#Recieve serial link is not 8-bit clean:
#Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
I am at a total loss.  When in Windows and useing a terminal program I
connect fine and see the "garbage" of TCP/IP starting, but I never get this
far in linux.

Useing:
pppd connect 'chat -v "" ATDT5766774 CONNECT "" ogin: usename word:
password' /dev/ttyS2 115200 lock debug crtscts modem defaultroute



------------------------------

From: Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: kppp setup solution!
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:35:06 +0800

Bernie wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I had kppp dial-up setup proplems with  kde in the Mandrake 6
> distribution (which is based on RedHat 6).
>
> The problem was that whatever I tried, the error message was:
>
> the ppp daemon died unexpectedly
>
> The current official solution to this setup problem which appears to
> be caused by the distribution is:
>
> Change the modem speed under the modem tab of the kppp setup once.
>
> After the change, (I set it up from 57,000 to 115,000) you
> can change it back to what you like.
>
> Regards,
> Bernie

What kind of modem are you using?

I had the same problem with my US Robotics voice ext.  My init string
was ATZ and my modem was no longer using the hardware flow control
default setting in the modem.

I changed it to AT&F1 which loaded the hardware flow control default
setting.

That enabled compression AND error-control both of which were previously
disabled.  My previous connection message was CONNECT 50666/ARQ. Using
AT&F1, it became that plus compression and error-control.

Apparently, if error-control was not enabled, the Kppp program reads
garbage from the ISP so it can't connect with your username and password
but it starts the pppd daemon anyway which will eventually die due to
ppp not being enabled on the ISP for your connection.

I don't know what your modem is but I hope this will help you to
understand whats going on and help to set up your Kppp correctly.  If
your serial port chip is a UART 16550 then you can use 57,600 or 115,200
baud.  Remember to is hardware flow control (not Xon/Xoff).

Christopher


------------------------------

From: "David A. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sendmail initialization is slow
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 21:28:35 -0400

I'm sure that this has been asked before, but here goes:  On my RH6.0 system
the bootup sequence pauses for a good 3 or 4 minutes as Sendmail is started.
What gives??

Thanks in advance,
David Ferguson




------------------------------

From: "Bwilkinson1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PING in NT DOMAIN and LINUX
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:38:58 +0100

Here is the information you requested...

Netstat -rn

Destination; Gateway; genmask;flags;mss;window;irtt;if
192.168.1.5 ;0.0.0.0 ;255.255.255.255;UH;0;0;0;eth0
192.168.1.0; 0.0.0.0 ;255.255.255.192;U ;0;0;0; eth0
127.0.0.0; 0.0.0.0; 255.0.0.0 ;U; 0;0;0; lo
0.0.0.0 ; 192.168.1.1; 0.0.0.0; UG; 0;0;0; eth0


arp -a
spjamir0.spjdom (192.168.1.1) at (incomplete) on eth0

ifconfig -a

eth0
link encap:ethernet hwaddr:(gives hardware address)
up broadcast running promisc multicast mtu:1500 metric:1
rx packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overuns:0 frame:0
txpackets:152 errors:0 dropped:0 overuns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 TXqueuelen:100
interupt:11 base address:0x300

lo
link encap:local loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 mask:255.0.0.0
up loobback running mtu:3924 metric:1
rxpackets:134 errors:0 Dropped:0 overuns:0 frames:0
txpackets:134 errors:0 Dropped:0 overuns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

I should have posted more info to begin with but I was hopping that I made a
simple configuration error.. Thanks to anyone who can help me.




Andrey Smirnov wrote in message
<7motq2$ent$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can you include output of ifconfig -a, netstat -rn commands,also arp -a
from
>all machines.
>
>Good luck!
>
>Bwilkinson1 wrote in message ...
>>I have three machine's on my home network. One NT Primary Domain
Controller
>>, One NT Workstation , and one Linux box running Mandrake 6.0. They are
all
>>plugged into a 10mb hub (not switched). All my machine sit behind a proxy
>>"Wingate 3.0" and are routed to the internet thru my DSL router. Of course
>>my PDC is the default Gateway. I want to set up my LINUX box to be the
>>Gateway but there is one problem.. I cant ping my NT boxes from Linux, and
>I
>>cant ping the Linux box from NT. The weird thing is that the Linux box
>>running Samba is able to announce itself on the NT browse list's but I am
>>unable to access it. If anybody has ran into this and could help me I
would
>>really appreciate it. I have spent many hours and have read countless man
>>pages and various documents. I have re-installed twice. I have configured
>>DNS instead of WINS. I would assume maybe a hardware problem, but the fact
>>it announces itself in network neighborhood. I have to assume that I have
>>configured the Networking portion of linux wrong. Here is what I have.
>>
>>NT PDC (3c509)
>>IP 192.168.1.1
>>Submask 255.255.255.192 (when I configured DNS it changed the 0 to 192...)
>>
>>NT WS (3c905)
>>IP 192.168.1.2
>>Submask 255.255.255.192
>>Default GW 192.168.1.1
>>
>>Linux Box (3c509)
>>IP 192.168.1.5
>>Submask 255.255.255.192
>>Primary NS 192.168.1.1
>>Secondary 192.168.1.5
>>
>>I entered all the hosts info in /etc/hosts... When I send out a ping I can
>>see activity between the hosts on the HUB lights.. They just dont recieve
>>responses. PLEASE HELP!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



------------------------------

From: David Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Building a Digital modem box with Linux ?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:43:57 +1000

        A company in australia is offering a linux box with a 56K digital modem
service. Thats dial in at 56K , not just dial out at 56K. 
        I have been hunting about to find what cards they would be using. Has
anyone had any experience with making a box like this? 
        DIGI have a seris of cards called "Datafire RAS" that look like it
would do the trick if it had linux support.
        The cards only cost $9999US for a 48 ports which is about what we pay
for a 16 port Ascend upgrade card here in Australia , so the benfits
would be amazing. As well as integrating the proxy etc directly into the
one box.
        Thanks,

    David Nillesen

Northnet Internet Services 
+612 67749300


For info on what this jumble below is look right at the bottom.
Type Bits/KeyID    Date       User ID
pub  2048/BBCA4E3D 1998/01/03 David A Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

=====BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK=====
Version: 2.6.3ia
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------------------------------

From: Michael Adam Schulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 1 way connection
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 18:39:15 -0700

I was wondering if you could setup a linux machine to listen on an
ethernet card without ever transmitting data on that connection, that is
if I cut the transmit wire(s) in the RJ45 cable, you could still receive
packets over that card.

I hope some of this makes sense.

Thanks, 
    Michael Schulman
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Subject: TCP Error: No Route to Host
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:37:32 GMT


Sunday July 18 1999 22:59, Joe Haberthier wrote to All:


 JH> I tried to set up a PPP conection with KPP and it connects with my
 JH> ISP, however its compalining about " NO ROUTE TO HOST". Below

It means you're not connected!

 KS




------------------------------

From: "Andre Konstantinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: can't get terminal parameters - not a typewriter
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 21:31:51 -0500

I get the following message:

Can't get terminal parameters: not a typewriter

when I try to run

/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS2 57600 lock crtscts modem noipdefault mru 1500 mtu
150 asyncmap 0 name "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -d
connect '/usr/sbin/chat -v -t 45 -r /etc/ppp/connect-errors
REPORT CONNECT ABORT BUSY ABORT "NO CARRIER" "" AT&F v=90 OK ATDT9700304
CONNECT "" ign-on: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

I have a modem on /dev/ttyS2 and seem to be able to dial from minicom. I
also have "setserial /dev/ttyS2 irq 2" statement in rc scripts.

What am I doing wrong here?
Andre



------------------------------

From: "Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: chat script problems
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 02:53:45 +0100

I can connect to my ISP using minicom, I can even conect using network setup
from red-hat's control panes, but I can't get chat to even talk to the
modem. Looking in /var/log/messages the modem never responds to anything.
I've tried something simple like

Abort '\nBsuy\r'
''  \rAT
'OK-+++\c-OK' ATH0
etc

but it never gets anywhere, what am I doing wrong?

Dean




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton)
Subject: Re: ???:Odd Masqu "Problem"??? - Solved!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 02:06:03 GMT

I have searched for a long time and spent months tinkering and I have
just solved this problem for myself.  I thought I would post the
results so that someone else may try this to resolve their problems.

(I tried all the suggestions I could find from Usenet searches with no
luck.)

As you might guess it was my own fault.

A quick recap ... I am using 2 very cheap ISA NE2000 clone cards and a
cheap un-managed hub in 486DX4-100 PC's.

The problem is that I also used a cheap coil of untwisted pair (8
conductor) wire to run the cable between the 2 computers and the hub
was located at the firewall pc ... not halfway between.  The end
result was that I didn't monitor the length of the line that I ran
carefully enough.  Anticipating that I may want to move the kids
computer I coiled up an extra length behind the wall "for later use".

The over all length was very close to 100 feet.  Out of desperation I
shortened the cable to about 50 feet.  I am now getting reliable 4K+
Byte-per-second transfer rates on 10+Meg files.  (Before it wouldn't
work at all.)  (The maximum theoretical for 10BaseT is about 1250K
Bytes-per-Second.)

I hope this helps out someone else in a similar predicament.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton) wrote:

>I am experiencing an odd "problem" in my IP Masq operation ... it
>happened with V2.0.36 and ipfwadm and is still occuring with V2.2.1
>and ipchains.
>
>The problem is that when I access a web page with graphics (?) on the
>same subnet as me and my ISP and only from the PC behind my "firewall"
>some graphic images refuse to complete loading.  It is fairly
>consistent.  When I access my home page (see below) from my kids
>Win3.11 computer (via Netscape) one of the Linux logos at the top
>doesn't load and only the top 5% of the "Kids Picture" will load.  The
>Linux machine loads the images perfectly EVERY time, the kids machine
>is im-perfectly EVERY time.  No other extra-subnet access seem to be
>effected.  The access in this manner are faster than the kids old 14.4
>modem so they are happy regardles BUT it bugs me!   :-)
>
>(I actually thought it was a patch problem and that the BIG upgrade
>for a 2.5 years newer installation would resolve the problem BUT such
>was not the case!)
>
>Netscape still shows the "waiting" indication BUT it never completes
>(in the time my patience allows) and when I click STOP it shows the
>outline of the missing graphic and the rest of the web page
>successfully.
>
>My network is 2 computers connected via NE2000 clones, a Win3.11 that
>my kids use and my Slackware 3.6, kernel V2.2.1 (it was Slackware 96
>and V2.0.36 before).  The firewall is via a dialup PPP connection on
>the Linux machine.  I use the simplest, single rule ipchains command
>.. everything masq out, nothing in BUT ping, etc (all the standard
>stuff).
>
>I have no idea how to approach trouble shooting this situation, it
>seems consistently BAD so it could be my configuration ... at least
>I'm consistent!!!
>
>Has any one seen, diagnosed or otherwise aware of this type of
>problem?  Any comments, suggestions or pointers would be greatly
>appreciated!
>
>
>------------------------------------------------
>  Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
>                'City of the Thousand Islands'
>  Amateur Radio: VE3DMZ      ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>          EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>           http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
>  SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
>------------------------------------------------


================================================
  Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
                'City of the Thousand Islands'
  Amateur Radio: VE3DMZ      ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
           http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
     User Group: http://signals.rmc.ca/klug
  SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
================================================

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Q: Getting message 'RPC program not registered ' when trying 
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:41:21 -0400

Marco Vranken wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I had the same problem a time ago.
> First you have to run samba (if you don't know how, there are a lot of mails
> in this newsgroup that
> tell you how).
> How I solved the problem is this:
> In the file /etc/rc.config you have set next settings:
> START_PORTMAP="yes"
> NFS_SERVER="yes"
>

You don't need samba for this. You just need to make sure that the nfs deamon
is running on the server machine.
If you're running RedHat, then you must go into /etc/rc.d/init.d and type ./nfs
start.
If this doesn't work,  your machine is broke.

Jeff

>
> You have to type in the global section of your samba configuration file
> (/etc/smb.conf) next lines:
> domain master = yes
> domain logons = yes
>
> Reboot your pc, and time-out is history.
>
> That solved my problem.
> Good luck!
>
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in berichtnieuws
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I have recently managed to get networking to connect between my laptop
> > and desktop machines, I can ping each machine but if I try to mount a
> > NFS filesystem from either end I get the error ' RPC program not
> > registered' can someone tell me how I do this, I have found no
> > reference to this in the manuals.
> >
> > Any help gratefully accepted


------------------------------

From: Ng Kiok Teck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Apache :- CacheNegotiatedDocs
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:46:00 +0800

Hi, does anyone know how get this setting works ?

==================================================================================================

# CacheNegotiatedDocs: By default, Apache sends Pragma: no-cache with
each
# document that was negotiated on the basis of content. This asks proxy
# servers not to cache the document. Uncommenting the following line
disables
# this behavior, and proxies will be allowed to cache the documents.

#CacheNegotiatedDocs




------------------------------

From: John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Machine disappears till ping?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 21:21:34 -0300

Hello Ed.

If I recall right it's a 10/100 MHz card, 3C595. I don't have it here,
it at the University, and I'll check it next week. I'm quite sure this
is the one though. And it's still up without problems after some
4-5 days now. So I guess the problem is solved.

I don't really like the solution of swapping boards and not knowing
the real motive of the problem. Strange no suggestions have been made
for a solution to this problem...

John

Ed Van Duinen wrote:
> 
> John,
> 
> I am also experiencing this problem on RH6.0 with all patches.
> 
> The system is a Dell OptiPlex GX1 with an integrated 10/100 NIC.  The
> chipset on the system board is a 3Com and Dell is advertising it as an
> "integrated 3Com� PCI 3C905B-TX Wakeup On LAN NIC, operating at 10 or
> 100 Mbps".
> 
> However, taking your lead, I disabled the integrated NIC and installed a
> 3Com 3C509TP ISA NIC. Unfortunately, the problem still continues...
> 
> Which 3Com card did you successful use?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ed Van Duinen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> John Coppens wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ricki & Haze
> >
> > No solution... I couldn't leave the university without a WWW, so I took
> > out the card and put in a 3Com card (stolen from a coleague's machine,
> > but
> > then he shouldn't have taken a vacation ;-). Everything is up and
> > doesn't
> > seem to have any problem at all. Still this thing has intrigued me and
> > I will try to experiment a bit more.
> >
> > John
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > > > John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > Hi...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Strange problem: our web server, www.uccor.edu.ar, at times disappears
> > > > > > and cannot be reached from the outside (not by www.uccor.edu.ar nor
> > > > > > by its IP, not by httpd nor other means).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I connect to another machine on the net there, and do a ping from
> > > > > > this machine to the webserver, everything wakes up, and the webserver
> > > > > > is suddenly visible again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > John

------------------------------

From: Monte Milanuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Auto check for email
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:54:14 -0600

Michael wrote:

> Is it possible to get Linux to check for emails automatically, I mean is
> there a programe there can call up the net, check for emails and then
> shutdown again, for instance every 10. minutes?
>
> Tanks in advance
>
> md

Well, yes... after you write it ;)  Seriously, though, that is what the
'cron' daemon is for.  Not _just_ checking email, mind you, but scheduling
just about anything to happen on a regular basis.  I would suggest try
using 'fetchmail', written by Eric Raymond.  Once you have it properly
configured, and dial-on-demand as well, just set up a cron script to run
every 10 minutes and it should automagically dial out, get your mail, and
disconnect.  YMMV

Monte


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to