Linux-Networking Digest #45, Volume #12 Thu, 29 Jul 99 12:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: Help ! Network problem.. (Vidar Andresen)
Re: PPP setup ("Andrew")
Re: WANTED: good instructions ("Martin C. Barlow")
Re: Can't use two ISA network card together (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Configuration of Macronix MX98715 ethernet card (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Activate NIC at boot (Vidar Andresen)
2.2.10, DNS, and module problems (Thomas M. Sasala)
Re: Cant telnet rh5.2 default install (Lew Pitcher)
Re: Use IPCHAINS to forward ext. port 80 to internal addy? (Alex Luchkovsky)
Re: POP3 (Chip Transisto)
Re: PPP setup (Clifford Kite)
Re: PPP setup (W.G. Unruh)
Re: ftp uploading, man ftpaccess sucks! (john@*NOSPAM*jjgb.com)
Adapter SMC9432BTX problem (Robert Szabo)
ncpmount permissions? ("G. Pollack")
ifconfig questions (Hamish)
startup disk ("christos karayiannis")
looking for source for net2phone ip module ("Darrel Davis")
pppd (version 2.3.5) and Linux (version 2.2.10 and 2.2.7) ("David Huxtable")
pppd (version 2.3.5) and Linux (version 2.2.10 and 2.2.7) ("David Huxtable")
mgetty (Chuck Snively)
How do I have two domain names with just one IP address? ("Masa Yamada")
Re: POP3 (john@*NOSPAM*jjgb.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Help ! Network problem..
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:13:40 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen) wrote:
>In article <7nmqa6$t3p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>"Fr�d�ric Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>>There are two chained HUB expecting 10/100Mbps
[...]
>If not: Trouble with chaining. One hub's uplink connected to one of
>the the others 'normal' jack with a 'normal' patch-cable.
The above is Ok, i belive. If it was a crossover tp, not good.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP setup
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 23:24:52 +1200
BillBarkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7noh3p$18p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Man, I hate to have to write this...
>
> I'm simply trying to get connected to an ISP using pppd.
>
> Not getting anywhere fast. The embarasing thing is, I'm not really THAT
> stupid (I think ;-)
>
> To the point: I'm looking at /var/log/messages and see that pppd says the
> 'modem is locked by user 750'.
>
> I'm using Red Hat distribution 5.0.
>
> Any pointers would be appreciated.
>
>
>
I think you should try KDE (k desktop environment) it is a very good working
environment. Lots of people using it.
In kde setup a PPP connection is straight forward by using KPPP (like the
dial-in window under windows).
And there heaps fun in KDE
You can find in most Linux FTP site or go http://www.kde.org
------------------------------
From: "Martin C. Barlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WANTED: good instructions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:54:07 +1000
Check out the Linux How-To's. They usually have what i am looking for
somewhere.
http://www.redhat.com/mirrors/LDP/HOWTO/
They are frequently put on distribution cds as well. The on-line versions
are kept up to date.
Martin C. Barlow
Daniel Orton wrote:
> Hello there, i am currently attempting to get a network (eathernet)
> connection between my win98 box and linux box
>
> Howerev i have found very litttle pratical informating on the internet
> as to even how to set of a linux network, heck i can't even tell if my
> card is set up correctly, ( i do a cat /proc/ioports /proc interrupts
> and it says there is an NE2000 device there but still.....)
>
> if any of you know of any faqs or guides that can give me setp-by-step
> instructions it would really help me.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Can't use two ISA network card together
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:13:39 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>Hi,
> My Linux machine with two network cards will try to connect up two LAN
>in future. But meanwhile only one network is available to me and I want
>to make sure both network card will work in future.
> I've tried to change the address of eth1 to a network that different
>with eth0. But when I tried to ping, it seems that packets are send out
>only by eth0. How to make the eth1 work together with eth0?
>Byron
You could '/sbin/ifup eth1' (but then eth0 goes dead)
What you ned is to make a route to the net connected to eth1.
'man route'.
(what kind of automatic is build into your distribution, i dont know.
Maybe linuxconf offer some solutions under 'Routing and gateways')
�������������Ĵ Linuxconf 1.11 (subrev 18) �������������Ŀ
� ������������Ĵ Network configurator ������������Ŀ �
� Th� ����������Ĵ Client tasks �����������Ŀ � �
� � Thi� � IP � �
� Us� net� Basic host information # � em � �
� an� (or� Name server specification (DNS) � � � �
� fo� � Routing and gateways � � � �
� � � Host name search path � � � �
� � � Network Information System (NIS) � � � �
� � � � � �
� � � ������Ŀ � � �
� � � � Quit � � � �
� � � �������� � � �
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
� � ��������������������������������������� � �
���������� ����� ���
But /usr/doc/HOWTO/ and net-3-HOWTO down on chapter 5.7 is what you
probably need.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Configuration of Macronix MX98715 ethernet card
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:13:41 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
JB Daskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
> I'd try to install Linux on my PC, but my ethernet card wasn't
>recognize. It is a Macronix MX98715 card, and I don't now with
> which card it is compatible.
tulip driver, I guess.
{ "Macronix 98715 PMAC",
0x10d9, 0x0531, 0xffff, PCI_ADDR0_IO, 256, 32, tulip_probe1 },
Found in tulip.c at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
So try the tulip driver you have, and if not, check there.
>
> If somebody can help me, or tell me what can I do ??
check anyway for info on loading. linuxconf is maybe what you end up
to use for setup.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: Activate NIC at boot
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:13:42 GMT
In article <FwTn3.902$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Kent Nilsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello, I've got 3 3c905B NICs in a Mandrake 6.0 w/kernel 2.2.9-19MDK
>(original kernel from distribution). My problem is that every time I boot, I
>have to start X, run netcfg and activate all NICs. I check the "Activate at
>boot", but it still won't do it automatically.
Morn. (Thats norwegian)
Linuxconf (if you do it that way) and set 1,2 and 3 to [*] Enabled.
��������������������Ĵ Adaptor 1 ���������������������Ŀ
ڳ �
�� [*] Enabled �
�� Config mode (*) Manual ( ) Dhcp ( ) Bootp �
It produce /etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0
ifcfg-eth1
ifcfg-eth2
With a setting of 'ONBOOT="yes"'
if not? Check http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
for possible new driver, tweaks, /etc/conf.modules setting. And
mailing list / web-archives.
'boot with pnp-os' in bios? cold boot or warm reboot?
>So, I figured there is some obscure script that takes care of it, but which,
>and what is the proper syntax to get it to auto-activate?
That would be to compile the driver it into the kernel and use lilo to
activate it at boot.
If you make a new kernel and _add_ it to lilo, that could be a way of
testing it without disturbing the setup you already got.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: Thomas M. Sasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: 2.2.10, DNS, and module problems
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:40:52 GMT
To all:
I recently upgraded to 2.2.10 from RH6.0
(2.2.5-??). In the process I compiled the kernel
with direct support of my two ethernet cards
instead of using modules. Ever since then
I have been getting error messages in the syslog
about can't find module. Something like:
mod_probe: can't locate module lo:0
mod_probe: can't locate module lo:1
....
mod_probe: can't locate module lo:49
The same goes for eth0, eth1. Now since
this only occured during boot up and my networking works
just fine, I didn't worry too much about it. However, I
recently added bind to my services. Now I get these messages
very frequently and they are filling up my log file. It seems that
named is some how causing the error messages in addition to the boot
time error messages. My syslog looks like this:
mod_probe: can't locate module lo:0
....
mod_probe: can't locate module lo:49
mod_probe: can't locate module eth0:0
....
mod_probe: can't locate module eth0:49
mod_probe: can't locate module eth1:0
....
mod_probe: can't locate module eth1:49
named[444]: reloading nameserver
named[444]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1025
named[444]: Ready to answer queries
named[444]: reloading nameserver
named[444]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1025
named[444]: Ready to answer queries
I get the above series of messages about every 1 minute
for up to 10 minutes. This happens at least once an hour.
I checked the error logs prior to building my own kernel
and there were no errors about modules. I tried rebuilding my
kernel with everything selected as a module, but the error message
were still there. Does anyone have a suggestion? I'm at a loss.
Thanks.
-Tom
--
****************************************************
** Send all important email to:
** sasala at pop dot dn dot net
****************************************************
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Cant telnet rh5.2 default install
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:20:56 GMT
Is the telnetd daemon up (or is it started by inetd and is inetd up)?
Are you using TCP Wrappers, and does your /etc/hosts.allow have a line
for 127.0.0.1 in it?
Does your /etc/hosts point localhost to 127.0.0.1?
Is your lo adaptor configured and addressed as 127.0.0.1?
Do you have firewalling enabled, and if so, are you permitting
connections through 127.0.0.1?
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 19:59:46 +1000, "ricK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This problem has not worried me before but now I need to use it, I have
>setup rh 5.2 using default ( everything ) I cant telnet anywhere, all it
>says is ` unable to connect to host localhost access denied ` its probably
>easy but I cant work out how to enable it ! driving me nuts.
>
>TIA Rick.
>
>
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Development Services
Toronto Dominion Bank
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')
------------------------------
From: Alex Luchkovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Use IPCHAINS to forward ext. port 80 to internal addy?
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:23:55 +0000
eLicT wrote:
>
> I am having trouble setting up IPCHAINS to forward port 80 from my
> cablemodem to an internal IP (10.0.0.12). I have IPCHAINS working and
> masqing for web browsing, and email, but need to have my web server be
> accessable from the outside. Any ideas? I am running redhat 6.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -e
You need to use ipmasqadm with portfw module.
Commands are:
ipchains -I forward -p tcp -s external_ip port -j MASQ
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L external_ip port -R internal_ip port
You have to test it from the outside of your network, not from the
inside or from the router.
Works for me for everything except #@$*& ftp connections, can't figure
that one out :-(
But I heard it works for other people...
Alex
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: POP3
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:45:41 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
I too am having a imap problem. I had 5.2 with sendmail. The only
thing I had to do to get imap to work was install it. I just
installed 6.0. Sendmail works fine but POP doesn't. I installed imap
but still can't use POP.
If I comment out the lines in /etc/inetd.conf as you say, will that
give me POP? or do I have another problem? Thanks for the help.
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:04:01 +0300, "�mer Uyar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>You must install imap package to support pop and imap. And in
>/etc/inetd.conf pop2 pop3 , imap lines must be commented out.
>Ozan ERCAN wrote in message <7np3m9$mn4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I setup red hat 6.0 yet. There is sendmail on it. But does it means POP3
>>support or not ?
>>
>>If not. How can i configure POP3 support ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP setup
Date: 29 Jul 1999 07:59:24 -0500
BillBarkley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: To the point: I'm looking at /var/log/messages and see that pppd says the
: 'modem is locked by user 750'.
Find out what 'user 750' is with ps -aux, perhaps a 'getty of some sort.
Perhaps something else. You'll need to remove it whatever it is. Check
the /etc/inittab then the /etc/rc.d/* boot files once you know it's name.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W.G. Unruh)
Subject: Re: PPP setup
Date: 29 Jul 99 13:39:41 GMT
"Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>BillBarkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7noh3p$18p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Man, I hate to have to write this...
>>
>> I'm simply trying to get connected to an ISP using pppd.
>>
>> Not getting anywhere fast. The embarasing thing is, I'm not really THAT
>> stupid (I think ;-)
>>
>> To the point: I'm looking at /var/log/messages and see that pppd says the
>> 'modem is locked by user 750'.
The lock files are located in /var/lock. Look for one which says
LCK..modem or LCK..ttyS1 or... and remover that file.
>>
>> I'm using Red Hat distribution 5.0.
You really should get a more recent distribution
(ie at least 5.2 or if you feel more advernturous, 6.0)
>>
>> Any pointers would be appreciated.
Go to axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
and follow the step by step instructions.
>>
>>
>>
>I think you should try KDE (k desktop environment) it is a very good working
>environment. Lots of people using it.
and many have trouble. kppp tends to make assumptions. If they are OK for your ISP
then it works well, if they are not, you are stuck with little debugging
information.
>In kde setup a PPP connection is straight forward by using KPPP (like the
>dial-in window under windows).
>And there heaps fun in KDE
And it tends to be very slow.
>You can find in most Linux FTP site or go http://www.kde.org
------------------------------
From: john@*NOSPAM*jjgb.com
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ftp uploading, man ftpaccess sucks!
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:18:51 -0600
Jeff Greer wrote:
> Can someone tell me why an anonymous user cannot upload. I've
> tried "man ftpaccess" This man file sucks like most other man
> files.
>
> thanks.
>
> I am running RH 5.2. Here is the file "/etc/ftpaccess"
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> email root@localhost
>
> loginfails 5
>
> readme README* login
> readme README* cwd=*
>
> message /welcome.msg login
> message .message cwd=*
>
> compress yes all
> tar yes all
> chmod no all
> delete yes all
> overwrite yes all
> rename yes all
>
> log transfers anonymous,real inbound,outbound
>
> shutdown /etc/shutmsg
>
> passwd-check
>
> upload /home/ftp /pub/in yes ftp ftp 0777
> --
> Jeff Greer
> B.S. computer science, University of MO - Rolla
> --------------------------------------------------
> Windows NT has crashed,
> I am the Blue Screen of Death,
> No one hears your screams...
This was my stock ftpaccess with my 5.2 and it seems to work okay. Try
it...
class all real,guest,anonymous *
email root@localhost
loginfails 5
readme README* login
readme README* cwd=*
message /welcome.msg login
message .message cwd=*
compress yes all
tar yes all
chmod no guest,anonymous
delete no guest,anonymous
overwrite no guest,anonymous
rename no guest,anonymous
log transfers anonymous,real inbound,outbound
shutdown /etc/shutmsg
passwd-check rfc822 warn
------------------------------
From: Robert Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Adapter SMC9432BTX problem
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:46:37 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we've run into a problem when trying to configure our SMC9432 BTX (Combo
BNC and UTP 10/100) networking card to run with its BNC interface.
We tried to load the module driver as proposed at
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/epic100.html
insmod epic100.o debug=1 options=1
which sets its media type to 10Base2/BNC.
Unfortunately it does not work.
Does anybody have any idea what to do?
Regards,
/robert
------------------------------
From: "G. Pollack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ncpmount permissions?
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:45:58 GMT
Is it possible for a non-root user to mount a novell server? I've made
ncpmount suid root, and the permissions on the mount point are 777, yet
when I attempt to mount the server while non-root I get "operation not
permitted". Is there something analogous to the 'user' option for mount?
An entry to made into fstab?
Thanks,
--
Gerald Pollack
Dept. of Biology, McGill University
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hamish)
Subject: ifconfig questions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:19:05 GMT
In a multihomed box ...
1. How do I disable one interface? "ifconfig ..."?
2. Is there a 'default' interface? If so, how do you manipulate which
interface is default?
3. Can I edit the fields (like default gateway) in
/etc/sysconfig/network directly, or should it be done with
"route del default ...", "route add default ..."
Thanks!,
Hamish
________________________________________
Remove NOSPAM from my address to write.
------------------------------
From: "christos karayiannis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: startup disk
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:26:57 +0300
I tried to create a second copy of my startup disk using the diskcopy
utility from DOS. It is the only one I know that copies disks sector by
sector. I didn't make it - I took a message illegal operation or something.
Is there another way to make it from Windows or Linux ?
christos
------------------------------
From: "Darrel Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: looking for source for net2phone ip module
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 10:04:57 -0400
Has anybody seen source for a module for ip_masq_net2phone?
I'd really like to find it since we are using Linux as a firewall and
I need to punch net2phone through it.
TIA
-darrel
------------------------------
From: "David Huxtable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd (version 2.3.5) and Linux (version 2.2.10 and 2.2.7)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:08:33 +0100
I suspect that pppd version 2.3.5 does not work with kernel version 2.2.10
since after pppd has connected to the modem and talks to my ISP it reports
that
it is unable to get the 'remote IP address' and exits.
My previous set up using Suse 5.3 (kernel version 2.0.36) worked just fine,
so I feel that the problem does not lie with the ISP
Here is a copy of my log, using Minicom to 'log into the ISP' ....
===========================================================
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x5bb5bd16> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp> <
11 04 05 e2>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05
e2>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic
0x5bb5bd16> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="FREE777283" password="*******"]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: Remote message:
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate
15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
0.0.0.0>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 <deflate
15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 < 11 05 00
01 04>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x2 < 11 05 00
01 04>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: Could not determine remote IP
address
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP TermReq id=0x4 "Could
not determine remote IP address"]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x3 < 11 05 00
01 03>]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x3 < 11 05 00
01 03>]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP TermAck id=0x4]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No
network protocols running"]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x1]
All comments will be appreciated
David Huxtable
------------------------------
From: "David Huxtable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd (version 2.3.5) and Linux (version 2.2.10 and 2.2.7)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:09:58 +0100
I suspect that pppd version 2.3.5 does not work with kernel version 2.2.10
since after pppd has connected to the modem and talks to my ISP it reports
that
it is unable to get the 'remote IP address' and exits.
My previous set up using Suse 5.3 (kernel version 2.0.36) worked just fine,
so I feel that the problem does not lie with the ISP
Here is a copy of my log, using Minicom to 'log into the ISP' ....
===========================================================
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
Jun 24 19:59:58 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x5bb5bd16> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp> <
11 04 05 e2>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05
e2>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic
0x5bb5bd16> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x5f7e4d5a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="FREE777283" password="*******"]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: Remote message:
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate
15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress
VJ 0f 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
0.0.0.0>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 <deflate
15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 < 11 05 00
01 04>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x2 < 11 05 00
01 04>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
212.1.135.46>]
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: Could not determine remote IP
address
Jun 24 19:59:59 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [IPCP TermReq id=0x4 "Could
not determine remote IP address"]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x3 < 11 05 00
01 03>]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x3 < 11 05 00
01 03>]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [IPCP TermAck id=0x4]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No
network protocols running"]
Jun 24 20:00:00 Linux pppd[2443]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x1]
All comments will be appreciated
David Huxtable
------------------------------
From: Chuck Snively <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mgetty
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:31:30 -0500
Hi All,
I have an internal modem as well as an external. I have configured
mgetty to accept incoming calls on my external modem from my internal
(testing purposes) modem using PAP.
My questions are:
1. When I issue the command "ifdown ppp0" my internal modem won't hang
up. It will hang up, however, when I issue the command "killall pppd"
What's going on here?
2. When this is all configured and mgetty is waiting for an incoming
call on my external modem, I issue the command "ifup ppp0" (internal
modem) and it takes about 30-40 seconds before the modem initializes and
dials.
Any ideas here?
Could you e-mail directly because my ISP is upgrading their news server
hard drive and everything is screwy.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance.
Chuck
------------------------------
From: "Masa Yamada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I have two domain names with just one IP address?
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:54:34 GMT
Hello,
I have a static IP address and a domain name matched with the IP address.
I am running Linux as a server.
I have another domain name that is hosted by an ISP. I am thinking of
moving that domain name
to my Linux machine, so eventually two domain names will use just one IP
address.
My question is how I will do this. Do I just need to make another set of
zone files? I mean, do I
need to make one regular zone file to get the IP address from the domain
name and one more
zone file to get the domain name from the IP address?
Do I need to make any changes to any files?
Thank you in advance,
Masa
------------------------------
From: john@*NOSPAM*jjgb.com
Subject: Re: POP3
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:24:05 -0600
Ozan ERCAN wrote:
> I setup red hat 6.0 yet. There is sendmail on it. But does it means POP3
> support or not ?
>
> If not. How can i configure POP3 support ?
I have RH5.2 and a friend has 6.0. Both of us downloaded qpopper from
Eudora. We tried all versions available and have both settled in on the 3.0
beta version. Runs fine under both 5.2 and 6.0 and supports APOP...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
