Linux-Networking Digest #155, Volume #12 Sun, 8 Aug 99 21:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: Get my linux box set up like WinProxy (Wingate) (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: RFC1178.TXT Choosing a name for your computer? ("Gregory D. Horne")
Samba slow Windows 9x authentication... ("Mooglez")
Re: Best Cheapest NICs for Linux? (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: Linux serial port communication (Frank da Cruz)
Samba: Windows NT and network permissions... ("Mooglez")
Help!! Can't get to the Internet through MS Proxy on home LAN ("Sean LaNeve")
Re: Sendmail Delivery Options (Peter McDermott)
Re: Control Linux from Windows ? ("Dylan")
Control Linux from Windows ? ("Dirk Schwier")
Re: dd Command (Stone)
Re: how to host a (private) news group on Linux PC (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Getting Desperate... MTU problem win IP MASQ ("Paul Dugas")
Re: Networking w/ notebook (Juergen Pabel)
Re: NIS: Server error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello! (Richard Dodsworth)
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello! (Richard Dodsworth)
Re: Samba & netatalk ("Jeffrey T. Nelson")
Hello! (Richard Dodsworth)
Hello! (Richard Dodsworth)
Re: Netscape (Juergen Pabel)
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Recommend a good cheap 10/100 card? (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SysOp Notes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IMAP daemon supports mail notification ? (haze)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Get my linux box set up like WinProxy (Wingate)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 01:52:43 +0300
Carlos Carbajal wrote:
> I've got my box dual booting to win98 and linux RH6 with two NICs -- one
> NIC to the Internet(ADSL - 1 static IP) one to the LAN (girlfriend's
> computer).
>
> On Win98 I'm running WinProxy so that one NIC & IP is connected to the
> Internet and the other NIC & IP acts as the proxy so my girlfriend can
> surf on the same connection.
>
> How do I duplicate something like this on Linux with the two NICs?
Install squid (on CD) for a caching proxy server. Then your girlfriend
will need to setup her browser to use your machine as proxy. Squid's
default port number is 3128. It is also better if you setup your browser
to use proxy as well (to benefit from caching effect).
HTH
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: "Gregory D. Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RFC1178.TXT Choosing a name for your computer?
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:32:48 -0400
Andrew Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just been over to internic.net and they don't seem to have this file?
> Has it been removed for a reason? Does anyone have this file.
>
> Andy
http://www.ccd.bnl.gov/network/general/rfc1178.html
------------------------------
From: "Mooglez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Samba slow Windows 9x authentication...
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 17:59:15 -0500
I have Samba 2.0.5a running as a PDC (Primary Domain Controller) for a
Windows 95, Windows 98, and a Windows NT Workstation 4 machine.
Everything works great, for the most part. When I log onto the domain from
my Windows NT Workstation 4 machine (Service Pack 4), it goes flawlessly (I
hit [Enter] after entering my username and password, and I'm logged in in
less than a second).
On the Windows 95 and Windows 98 machines, however, it takes about 10 full
seconds to authenticate these machines when they login.
After they are logged in, the performance is great -- it's just the
authentication that takes too long.
I'm not sure what I did to Samba to make this happen, but I do know that
this never happend before (the Windows 9x machines used to get authenticated
just as quickly as the Windows NT box does). Installing newer versions of
Samba has not helped.
I have password encryption enabled.
Any idea what's wrong?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated!
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best Cheapest NICs for Linux?
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 01:42:02 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, 08 Aug 1999 06:46:01 GMT, Speedy Fast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What are the cheapest NICs that are supported in Linux?? Preferably
> >NICs that are widely supported by Linux and are easy to install.
>
> Probably NE2000 clones. Cheap and plentiful. Non-plug-and-pray type
> are best.
Also Macronix-98715 based 10/100 Mbps cards (I got CNet-Pro120c) are
around $15 and they work fine with latest tulip driver (v0.91 and up). I
have also heard of some other chipset (cant remember what) based 10/100
cards with $10 label.
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank da Cruz)
Subject: Re: Linux serial port communication
Date: 8 Aug 1999 22:34:46 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Runs With Scissors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: In my work, I often need to connect a PC to a PBX or other device that has a
: serial port.
:
: I've been doing this by using ProComm Plus running under DOS or
: Windows. That has always worked well for me, because PC+ is very flexible
: and allows me to set different baud rates, stop bits, terminal emulations,
: key bindings, and so on for each entry in the dialing directory. Sometimes,
: I use the modem port, but more often use the serial port and a cable to
: connect directly between the two machines. I have not yet found out how to
: do this same function while using Linux. Minicom comes pretty close, but
: doesn't have near enough choices for terminal emulations and key bindings.
: The HOWTO's for serial ports and text terminals seem to be assuming that I
: want to connect a terminal to my Linux box to log into Linux from the
: terminal. What I want is the rverse of that function, where I'll be able to
: set my Linux xterm window to use whatever terminal emulation will work with
: the remote machine. Can anyone point me in the right direction for info on
: how to do this, or what programs to use for this? Thanks for any help you
: might provide. -BA
:
Linux (and Unix in general) differs from Windows & DOS in its ability to
support PC-like communication software. In DOS and Windows, the application
is hardwired to the physical keyboard in screen, whereas in Unix, the
application can be coming from anywhere, and furthermore is isolated from the
physical keyboard and screen by the kernel and, in general, by the lack of any
APIs to get at them.
Instead, use a communications program like Minicom or C-Kermit in your xterm
or console window. Xterm or the console driver provides the terminal
functions (key mapping, escape sequence interpretation, etc), and Minicom or
C-Kermit provide the communication and (at least in Kermit's case) file
transfer and character-set translation and scripting. More about C-Kermit at:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ck70.html
- Frank
------------------------------
From: "Mooglez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Samba: Windows NT and network permissions...
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:06:42 -0500
I have Samba 2.0.5a running as a PDC (Primary Domain Controller) for a
Windows 95, Windows 98, and a Windows NT Workstation 4 machine.
On the Windows NT box, when I log on to the domain (controlled by the Samba
PDC), I can connect to the *server* without a problem. I can also, in
Network Neighborhood, see the Windows 9x machines. However, when I make an
attempt to connect to one of the Windows 9x machines (ie. I double-click one
of them), Windows NT gives me a message box saying:
\\Hydra is not accessible.
Access is denied.
(Hydra is the name of the Windows 95 box, by the way.)
This only happens on the Windows NT machine when I'm logged on to the domain
with my domain account. It is possible for me to browse the Windows 9x
machines if I log into the Windows NT machine as Administrator, but that is
pretty much unacceptable.
How can I continue to be logged on to the Samba controlled domain and still
be able to browse the other clients that are also logged on?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated!
------------------------------
From: "Sean LaNeve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help!! Can't get to the Internet through MS Proxy on home LAN
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:46:17 -0400
This is my 8th attempt at using Linux!!! I really want to learn the
system...but I can't get to the internet once it's installed. I'm using RH
6.0 and have configured the linux machine with a static IP, I made the
default gateway the MS Proxy box (which is connected via ADSL). I can ping
every machine on the network...but if I ping an internet (www) address it
fails to return packets. It looks as if it's resolving the name (I get the
IP address), but I always get 100% packet loss.
I'm pretty sure this is common behind a proxy server, but when I open
Netscape I get nothing. Every address times out leaving me staring at a
blank browser!! I have configured Netscape to use the proxy server
(manually entering the address and port). If I could just access the
internet I'd probably be using Linux instead of this damn Win98 machine!!
------------------------------
From: Peter McDermott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,demon.ip.support.unix,demon.tech.unix
Subject: Re: Sendmail Delivery Options
Date: 6 Aug 1999 14:31:31 +0100
In demon.ip.support.unix stefan the exiled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew> I have a 99% working sendmail config on a Mandrake 6
> Andrew> box. What makes Sendmail queue it's external mail until my
> Andrew> ppp connection is up but deliver internal mail imediatley?
> The default setup AFAIK. If the ppp connection isn't up sendmail
> should simply queue external mail anyway because it can't look them up
> in DNS or connect to the host.
> The only thing you might want to do is ensure sendmail isn't running
> the queue every 15 minutes, or whatever, by making sure it starts as
> just `sendmail -bd' rather than `sendmail -bd -q15', and then just run
> the queue when you connect with `sendmail -q' in /etc/ppp/ip-up.
I've got a question here. Two questions, in fact. One a sendmail
question, one a suck question.
I configured my current set-up using the very helpful guides
on www.hopf.demon.co.uk, and it works rather well, but for two
things.
At the moment, I'm using kppp to initiate a ppp connection. When
I initially connect, none of the mail can get through, because
I've got sendmail set to check the mail domains resolve properly,
but the punts seem to attempt delivery before access to demon's
dns servers kicks in. So sendmail just keeps refusing to deliver,
offering up continuous 'cannot resolve' messages in the mail log.
I kill the sendmail demon, and then re-launch it, and everything
is fine. So, my question is, is there some way I can stop the
punts from attempting to deliver immediately, or does anyone have
any other clues what I should do to fix this?
Question number two, is my suck question. For some reason,
I can't seem to run suck from within a script. I've tried to
call it from withing ip-up, I've tried it from a script of
it's own. Nada. I'm probably missing something completely
obvious, but I've no idea what it might be. It runs fine if
I just type the same command by hand.
Clues please?
------------------------------
From: "Dylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Control Linux from Windows ?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:52:14 +0200
Telnet?
VNC if you need a more userfriendly interface
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/index.html
Dirk Schwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7oktg9$la8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anybody know if there exists a (freeware) Utlitity, which allows me
to
> control programs on a network Linux Server from Windows e.g. converting a
> Postscript to PDF Document.?
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Dirk Schwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Control Linux from Windows ?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:01:06 +0200
Does anybody know if there exists a (freeware) Utlitity, which allows me to
control programs on a network Linux Server from Windows e.g. converting a
Postscript to PDF Document.?
------------------------------
From: Stone <"stone96 "@ hotmail .com>
Subject: Re: dd Command
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 20:04:05 -0400
dd if=dev/hda2 of=/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1
hda must be your linux partition
then copy the bootsect.lnx file to your nt partition
take the read only attributes off of the boot.ini file and add this line
C:\bootsect.lnx="Penguins"
C:\ is what ever drive your boot.ini file is on
put read only back on the boot.ini file
reboot and when the nt boot loader come up you will have both nt and
penguins to choose from
KYLui wrote:
> How to add linux to the boot list of Window NT??
> use dd command ??
>
> thx..
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to host a (private) news group on Linux PC
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 02:18:35 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to host a private news group on my Linux PC. How can I do
> this ? Is there a how-to on hosting a news group. What software do
> I need ?
There is a chapter for this in Network-Admin-Guide (LDP).
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: "Paul Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Getting Desperate... MTU problem win IP MASQ
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 19:20:12 -0400
OK, I've been tinkering with this one for over a month and have yet to come
up with a viable solution. I've also yet to get an answer to a post so I
guess I'm either in the wrong place or I'm having trouble explaining the
problem. One more time...
I've got a Linux machine (redhat 5.2) setup as my router/firewall/NAT for my
home network. The outside connection is BellSouth's new FastAccess IFITL
systems offering ADSL speeds but via PPP-over-Ethernet rather than
traditional IP setup via DHCP. The result is that my outside connection is
ppp0 rather than eth0. The internal interface is eth1 (if that matters).
It appears the problem I am having is due to the MTU/MRU of 1492 on ppp0
instead of the traditional 1500 and the problem of ICMP error messages of
MTU discoveries not being returned to internal hosts through NAT.
I've seen *many* postings, faqs, and other documentation explaining the root
of the problem but have yet to see anything that appears to fix it. Is
there a way around this? Please don't force me to setup a proxy server!
Here's the kicker... While I was working on a PPPoE solution for Linux, I
was using a Win98 box running ICS as the router and *everything* worked.
Granted, it was slower, but I can't believe Bills minions have managet to
get this working but the rest of us in the Linux community can't. There's a
solution out there. I just haven't hear about it yet. Any help?
-Paul
--
Paul Dugas
(delete the first token and dot to reply)
------------------------------
From: Juergen Pabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking w/ notebook
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 20:08:06 -0400
check out the dhcp protocoll, this requires a dhcp server running on
your networks though but this is quite easy to setup in linux...
check the faq's
jp
myBid wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running RedHat 6.0 on a laptop and would like to have the flexibility
> of plugging into different ethernet ports (using different IP address, of
> course). Now, when I configured the laptop, I configured it using a
> static IP address (it wouldn't accept the bootp, etc options), and I'm not
> able to re-configure it to work off of another IP address.
>
> I've tried using the Control Panel->Networking applet to re-configure the
> system to another IP address, gateway, etc. I've also modified, manually,
> /etc/hosts ; /etc/sysconfig/network ; and
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 with a reboot. When I try
> re-configuring the files, at rebooting gets stuck on the initiation of
> sendmail (until I pop out the ethernet PCMCIA card and hit <ctrl>-c).
>
> Any suggestions on how I can configure the machine "dynamically"? Thanks
> much!
>
> -Yiing Lin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NIS: Server error
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 23:23:08 GMT
Hi. Here is some more information about my problem:
I can do "yppoll passwd.byname" and get some info back from server. I
can do "ypwhich -x" to get a listing of maps on the server. Sometimes,
I can do "ypcat passwd" and get the first line of the password file
before it gives me "YP: Server error." I have tried specifying the NIS
server by IP address, and adding the NIS server to the client's host
file, and adding the clients to the NIS server's host file. Still not
working.
Please, I need help! This problem has been bugging me for over a week
now.
Artit J.
In article <7o2bfj$c7l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On my small home network, I am trying to setup NIS. I've followed the
NIS-
> HOWTO, and have ypserv 1.36 running on the server, and ypbind running
> on the client. I checked by running "rpcinfo -p". I did the
whole "ypinit -m"
> thing, ran make in the /var/yp directory just to make sure, and set
the
> domainname on both systems to the same thing, "artitj.com". On the
client, I
> added the NIS server name to the yp.conf file. When I try to do
a "ypcat
> passwd", I get a server error. I ran ypserv in debug mode and this is
what I
> got:
>
> [Welcome to the NYS YP Server, version 1.3.6 (with securenets)]
> Find securenet: 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.0
> Find securenet: 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0
> ypserv.conf: dns: 1
> ypproc_all_2_svc(): [From: 192.168.0.10:755]
> domain = "artitj.com"
> map = "passwd.byname"
> db_open("artitj.com", "passwd.byname")
> ->Returning OK!
> Opening: artitj.com/passwd.byname (0) 805a5f8
> ypdb_close() called
> connect from 192.168.0.10
> Found: artitj.com/passwd.byname (0)
> -> First value returned.
> ypproc_domain("artitj.com") [From: 192.168.0.10:755]
> connect from 192.168.0.10
> -> Ok.
> <the above message was repeated a few more times>
>
> On all my linux machines, I am running Slackware 4. I also have DNS
setup
> on the server, if that makes a difference. The network isn't connect
to the
> internet. Help please!!!
>
> Artit J
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 6 Aug 1999 01:30:42 GMT
networking,comp.os.linux.security Subject: Re
Where to get ICQ!Date: 07 Aug 1999 15:15:40 -0400.Organ
Dennis Quaid, "Inner Space"OPath: news.vide
Ok, I have RH 6.0 and access internet through ADSL connection, DHCP.
Internet works great. But when I login I get a message saying my host name
(a combination of letters and numbers given to me by my isp) is unreachable
on the internet and may cause Gnome not to work properly, so I should enter
my host name into the etc/hosts file. I do this, but upon bootup I get the
same message, and when I check the hosts file the line I entered is gone.
With LinuxConfig I entered my host name in the box it gives me. Should I be
entering my entire net address instead? Any ideas?
Thanks to all replies - so far you guys have been a great help :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B.T.)
Hi.
I have a home LAN that will soon have ADSL access. I am trying to
give only some of the users on my LAN Internet access while
prohibiting others from doing so. One method I thought of is matching
IP addresses to corresponding mac addresses. That is, my Linux server
will check to make sure that a certain computer that has been assigned
a certain IP address will have a certain mac address before access is
given. I haven't been able to locate such an option in the I.P.
Masquerading software or the IPChains software. I do not want to
modify the C++ source code to do so unless it is absolutely necessary.
Any other suggestions is welcomed.
B.T.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Thorsteinson)
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 05:19:44 GMT, "George Georgakis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's pretty easy. Basically, you use the htpasswd program in the support
>directory to add users, and in each directory you wish to have restricted
>access you add the following in a .htaccess file:
>
> AuthName "restricted stuff"
> AuthType Basic
> AuthUserFile /usr/local/etc/httpd/users
------------------------------
From: Richard Dodsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hello!
Date: 6 Aug 1999 15:14:00 GMT
00-50-ba-a8-8e-01.bconnected.net+Message-ID: <7oi159$p6q$1@nntp
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 6 Aug 1999 17:03:28 GMT
;Xref: news.videotron.ab.ca comp.os.linux.networ
the etc/hosts file. I do this, b
entered my host name in the box
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 6 Aug 1999 22:24:02 GMT
address instead? Any ideas?
X
Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235&Org
ip40.san-francisco25.ca.pub-ip.p
38$35c88900$0101a8c0@george>%X-Newsreader: Forte
gent 1.5/32.451MIME-Version: 1.0+Content-Type: text/plain; cha
4.200.2.41%X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posting-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 15:53:08 EDT;
MT, "George Georgakis",<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>to restrict an area just to certain users, make the last line
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 7 Aug 1999 22:39:18 GMT
97.ix.netcom.com/X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Aug 07
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 6 Aug 1999 05:42:56 GMT
------------------------------
From: Richard Dodsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hello!
Date: 7 Aug 1999 20:49:06 GMT
Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-T
------------------------------
From: "Jeffrey T. Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba & netatalk
Date: 8 Aug 1999 22:32:49 GMT
Here's another question: Can you share the same volume through both Samba and Netatalk
so that both PC's and Macs can read the same files?
(Is there a FAQ somewhere about this maybe?)
Jeff Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Yes. They seem to be mutually friendly as far as I've seen. I'm running
: RH6.0, used as file server for mac and windows clients.
: Dan.
: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, dkselich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Can I run samba and netatalk on a linux box with one network card to
:>connect to a windows box and a mac at the same time?
:>
:>Dennis
--
Jeff Nelson, Assistant Technology Coordinator
Intensive American Language Center, Washington State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Richard Dodsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hello!
Date: 6 Aug 1999 13:31:10 GMT
------------------------------
From: Richard Dodsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hello!
Date: 6 Aug 1999 13:53:16 GMT
------------------------------
From: Juergen Pabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 20:10:04 -0400
>>just a hint: try english...many more people speak english than german...
>>und noch was: es gibt deutsche linux ng's falls du kein english sprichst...
jp
"Lars Grenzend�rfer" wrote:
>
> Tachchen,
>
> ich habe einen Linux-Server laufen, der sich bei Bedarf mit dem Internet
> verbindet. Mein Problem besteht nun darin, sobald ich mit Netscape Mails
> oder News abrufen will, wird im unteren Fenster Netscape Netcaster �bers
> Internet geladen. Das bedeutet, da� mein Server deshalb eine Verbindung
> aufbaut. Gibt es Tricks, damit man Netscape so konfigurieren kann, damit er
> Netcaster nicht l�dt?
>
> Danke!
>
> Lars
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 2 Aug 1999 18:29:58 GMT
ate: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 12:46:59 -0600!NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.225.39.
4LX-Trace: news.uswest.net 934051410 207.225.39.
4 (Sat, 07 Aug 1999 13:43:30CDT)1NNTP-Posting-
ate: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 13:43:30 CDT"Organization: U S WEST Interpris
for 'Real NAT' on RH6.0. But I c
> The firewall will listen on serval IPs (193.42.1.42, 193.42.1.43), then
> using
> ipmasqadm do the forwarding to the internal IP.
By entering ?linux+nat into netscape's url box, I retrieved sme links.
About a quarter of the way down is:
http://linas.org/linux/load.html
I believe the two of you will find it useful.
Cheers.
Bill
From: "Shane Chrisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The MS Exchange server wont have the externel IP address but rather an
internal address and what you will need to do is set up port forwarding so
that and requests coming in from the internet get forwarded onto the
exchange server via the internel IP Masquerading.
Check the IPCHAINS-HOWTO for more info.
http://www.adelaide.net.au/~rustcorp/linux/ipchains although I think they
have just changed address. So just look it up on a Linux mirror close to
you.
Shane Chrisp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7of9ch$j8s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying to implement a solution that includes
> using DSL, MS Exchange and only 1 ip address. I
> want to know if Exchange will work if the IP
> address that it is running on is masqueraded. I
> want to use rh-60 as a firewall with an exchange
> server behind it. The problem is I only have 1
> ip to work with. Will this work.
>
> Aaron Friedel
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
From: Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They are available from the creative site: www.sblive.com
airmax95 wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i also have the sblive! and i am planning on install redhat 6.0 soon...
> could you please tell me where you got the drivers for the sblive! and the
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 7 Aug 1999 22:53:28 GMT
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Recommend a good cheap 10/100 card?
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 02:13:03 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I read the HOWTO. There are alot of 10/100 cards to choose
> from. Can anyone recommend a cheap one that works well
> (at 100 MBS) with linux?
> Thanx,
> Art.
Macronix 98715 based 10/100 cards (I use CNet-Pro120c) work good with
latest tulip driver. They are about $15.
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 8 Aug 1999 03:17:54 GMT
4:19 PM CDT 1999X-Priority: 3X-MSMail-Priority: N
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SysOp Notes
Date: 7 Aug 1999 01:20:12 GMT
------------------------------
From: haze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IMAP daemon supports mail notification ?
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 23:27:50 GMT
Not an answer but wondering if you could explain what you did to
configure the imap server and is it available in 6.0
HAZE
Chris Severn wrote:
> I've noticed that as part of the IMAP specification,
> it allows a client which is connected to it to receive
> notification of new mails as soon as they arrive.
>
> I have tried this with the default Redhat5.2 IMAP
> server, using outlook express, and pegasus mail as
> the clients.� To receive new mail, I have to
> interactively check.
>
> How do I get the server to send new mail notifications ?
>
> Is it a setting on the server, a setting on the client,
> or do I need a new server ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chris Severn
> --
> Delete the 'x' to remove the spamblock.
> Except spammers, for whom my email address is abuse@localhost
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
